Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:06:27.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P wave dispersion in assessment of dysrhythmia risk in patients with secundum type atrial septal defect and the effect of transcatheter or surgical closure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2019

Mürüvvet Cenk*
Affiliation:
Clinic of Pediatrics, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
Figen Akalın
Affiliation:
Clinic of Pediatric Cardiology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
Berna Ç. Şaylan
Affiliation:
Clinic of Pediatric Cardiology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
Koray Ak
Affiliation:
Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Mürüvvet Cenk, Clinic of Pediatrics, Marmara University Hospital, Fevzi Çakmak mahallesi Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu caddesi No:10, Pendik, İstanbul 34899, Turkey. Tel: +905364191641; Fax: +902166254639; E-mail: muruvvetcenk@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Atrial dysrhythmia is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with atrial septal defect. Increased P wave duration can predict the risk of atrial dysrhythmia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk of atrial dysrhythmia by measuring P wave dispersion, and to observe the effect of surgical and transcatheter closure. Sixty-one patients and 30 controls were investigated. In patient group, before and after closure and in control group at the time of presentation, 12-lead electrocardiography records were evaluated. P wave duration and amplitude, P wave axis, PR interval, P wave dispersion, QRS axis, corrected QT interval, and QT dispersion were calculated. The measurements in patient and control groups, measurements before and after closure, and measurements of surgical and transcatheter group were compared. There were 27 patients in surgical group and 34 patients in transcatheter group. In patient group, signs of right heart volume overload were apparent but there was no significant difference in terms of P wave dispersion between two groups. We compared patient group in itself and found that while the use of medication, cardiothoracic index, ratio of right ventricular dilation, and paradoxical movement in interventricular septum were increased, mean age of closure was younger in surgical group. While P wave dispersion decreased in transcatheter group after closure, it increased in surgical group (p = 0.021). In conclusion, atrial septal defects may cause atrial repolarisation abnormalities and this effect persists even after surgical closure. Transcatheter closure in childhood may decrease dysrhythmia risk in long-term follow-up.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Atrial septal defect is one of the most common CHDs. Most of the patients have no symptoms and diagnosis is delayed.Reference Geva, Martins and Wald1 Early diagnosis and treatment are very important to prevent complications such as pulmonary hypertension, right heart failure, and atrial arrhythmias.Reference Kaya, Baykan and Dogan2 In patients with atrial septal defect, the volume overload in right heart causes prolongation in atrial activation time and non-homogeneous sinus impulses by changing geometrical and electrical structure of the heart.Reference Chubb, Whitaker and Williams3Reference Roberts-Thomson, John and Worthley5 All these changes provide a basis for atrial arrhythmia. These electrophysiological changes can be detected by measuring P wave maximum duration and P wave dispersion on electrocardiogram. While P wave maximum duration displays inter-atrial conduction disturbances, P wave dispersion displays non-homogeneous atrial conduction. Regional changes in atrial activation time have various effects in P waves in different locations. So, regional delay in atrial depolarisation may cause heterogeneous P wave duration, in other words it may cause increased P wave dispersion.Reference Baspinar, Sucu, Koruk, Kervancioglu and Ustunsoy6Reference Dilaveris, Gialafos and Sideris8

The electrophysiological studies in patients with secundum type atrial septal defect show that sinus node dysfunction begins in early childhood.Reference Ho, Chia, Yip and Chan9 One of the indications for closure in secundum type atrial septal defect is to prevent probable atrial arrhythmias. The defect can be closed surgically or by transcatheter method. While transcatheter closure can be performed in only selected secundum type atrial septal defect patients, surgical closure can be performed in all types of atrial septal defects and also in complicated ones. While both methods have similar success rates, in transcatheter method the complication rates and duration of hospital stay are less and patients’ satisfaction is more.Reference Du, Hijazi and Kleinman10Reference Cowley, Lloyd, Bove, Gaffney, Dietrich and Rocchini14 Surgical repair may cause arrhythmia, pericardial and pleural effusions, complications related to blood transfusion, and incisional scars.Reference Villablanca, Briston and Rodés-Cabau12 In this study, we aimed to evaluate the risk of atrial arrhythmia in patients with secundum type atrial septal defect by measuring P wave dispersion before and after closure, and to observe the effect of surgical and transcatheter closure on P wave dispersion and therefore on the risk of atrial arrhythmia.

Materials and methods

We enrolled two groups as patient and control groups. Sixty-one patients followed up due to repaired secundum type atrial septal defect in Marmara University Pediatric Cardiology Clinics and 30 controls who applied to our clinic for non-specific complaints and had normal echocardiography were investigated. The patient group is also divided into transcatheter and surgical groups according to their repairment method. Demographic findings, signs of physical examination, data of telecardiography, echocardiography, and angiography if present were evaluated from patients’ records, retrospectively. In patient group, before and after closure and in control group at the time of presentation, 12-lead electrocardiography records were evaluated.

Demographic findings

We recorded the age, sex, physical examination findings, blood pressure values, medications, genetic syndromes, and arrhythmias if present, in both patients group before closure and control group.

Telecardiography findings

We investigated telecardiography findings in patients group before closure and in control group at the time of admission. We recorded calculated cardiothoracic ratio, the status of pulmonary vascularity, and congestion.

Echocardiography findings

Echocardiographic examinations were performed using Philips IE33 echocardiography machine equipped with S5-1, S8-3 transducers. We recorded echocardiography findings in patients group before closure and in control group at the time of admission. We investigated dilatation findings in right atrium and ventricle, existence of paradoxical septal motion, the size of the atrial septal defect, the length of septum, and any other cardiac pathology in two-dimensional echocardiography. We recorded the values of interventricular septum thickness at end-diastole (IVSd), left ventricular dimensions at end-diastole (LVDd), left ventricular dimensions at end-sistole (LVSd), left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-diastole (LVPWd), calculated shortening fraction, and ejection fraction using M-Mode echocardiography from parasternal long axis. Using pulse wave Doppler echocardiography from mitral inflow, we recorded the peak early diastolic flow velocity (mitral E), the peak atrial flow velocity (mitral A), and their ratio (E/A), deceleration time, and isovolumetric relaxation time.

Catheter angiography findings

The diameter of the atrial septal defect measured by balloon sizing, pulmonary arterial pressures, and pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio were recorded.

Electrocardiography

Twelve-lead surface electrocardiography records were investigated in patient group before and 1 month after closure and in control group at the time of admission. Each electrocardiography was measured at a paper speed of 25 mm/second and 10 mm/mV standarisation. The electrocardiographies which had less than nine derivations and different standardisation were excluded from the study. One observer evaluated the electrocardiographies in order to exclude inter-observer variability. Heart rate and axis, P wave axis, P wave maximum duration, P wave minimum duration, P wave dispersion, PR interval, duration and amplitude of P wave in lead II, QRS duration, corrected QT interval, QT dispersion, amplitude of R and S waves, and their ratio in lead V1 and V5 were recorded. We compared findings separately between control group and patient group before closure and also in patient group before and after closure.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS Statistical Package for Windows version 17.0. Data were expressed as means ± standard deviations or median and range as appropriate. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Pearson chi square test, Fisher’s exact test, independent samples t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and repeated measures ANOVA test were used. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We enrolled 61 patients with repaired secundum type atrial septal defect and 30 controls in the study. In patient group, the defect was closed by transcatheter method in 34 of 61 patients and by surgery in 27 patients. There was no significant difference with respect to age, gender, weight, existence of genetic syndrome, and arrhythmia between patient and control groups (p > 0.05) (Tables 1 and 2). There were 34 girls (55.74%) in patient group and 17 girls (56.67%) in control group. The mean age was 72.19 ± 49.24 months in patients group and 68.33 ± 58.07 months in control group. In terms of physical examination findings and medications, there was statistically significant difference between two groups (p value <0.001 and 0.009, respectively) (Table 2).

Table 1. Comparison of age and weight between patients and control groups

Table 2. Comparison of demographical findings between patients and control groups

PE = physical examination

* p < 0.05, statistically significant

The patient group was divided into transcatheter and surgical groups. The mean age and weight was lower in surgical group (55.77 ± 48.95 months and 18.75 ± 14.73 kg, respectively) than transcatheter group (82.23 ± 46.09 months and 24.30 ± 13.59 kg, respectively) (p value 0.007 and 0.011, respectively). In surgical group, more patients took medication than transcatheter group (37.04% versus 5.88%, p = 0.002). While there was no arrhythmia in transcatheter group, 7.41% of the patients in surgical group had atrial arrhythmia but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.107).

We also examined telecardiography findings in terms of cardiothoracic ratio, pulmonary vascularity, and pulmonary venous congestion. We found that mean cardiothoracic ratio was higher in the patient group than the control group (0.53 ± 0.06 and 0.47 ± 0.03, respectively, p < 0.001) and in surgical group than transcatheter group (0.55 ± 0.6 and 0.51 ± 0.05, respectively, p = 0.003).

We recorded the size of the atrial septal defect, total septum length measured by echocardiography, and calculated their ratio. The mean size of defect was higher in surgical group (15.23 ± 7.0 mm) than transcathether group (12.02 ± 3.41 mm) (p = 0.085). The ratio of defect size and total septum length was higher in surgical group (0.51 ± 0.17) than transcatheter group (0.34 ± 0.07) and this was statistically significant (p = 0.002). The echocardiography findings were examined in terms of right ventricular dilatation and paradoxical septal movement. While right ventricular dilatation was seen in 61.76% of patients in transcatheter group, all of patients had right ventricular dilatation in surgical group (p < 0.001). Although no patients had paradoxical septal movement in transcatheter group, 14.81% of patients in surgical group had paradoxical septal movement (p = 0.020).

Surface electrocardiographies of control group and patients group before closure were examined. While mean values of P wave minimum duration, P wave maximum duration, PR duration, QT dispersion, P amplitude in D2 derivation, R amplitude and R/S ratio in V1 derivation, and S amplitude in V5 derivation were higher, S amplitude in V1 derivation and R/S ratio in V5 derivation were lower in patients group than control group. Other parameters were similar in both groups (Table 3).

Table 3. Comparison of surface electrocardiography findings between patients and control groups

SD = standard deviation; P min = P wave minimum duration; P max = P wave maximum duration; P disp = P wave dispersion; QTc = corrected QT interval; amp = amplitude

* p < 0.05, statistically significant

Electrocardiography measurements of transcatheter and surgical groups before defect closure were compared. Mean heart rate and R amplitude in V1 derivation were higher in surgical group. P wave dispersion and R amplitude in V5 derivation were higher in transcatheter group. There was no statistically significant difference by means of other parameters (Table 4).

Table 4. Comparison of surface electrocardiography findings between transcatheter and surgical groups before defect closure

SD = standard deviation; P min = P wave minimum duration; P max = P wave maximum duration; P disp = P wave dispersion; QTc = corrected QT interval; amp = amplitude

* p < 0.05, statistically significant

We also compared the electrocardiography measurements before and after defect closure between transcatheter and surgical groups. While P wave dispersion was decreasing in transcatheter group after closure, it increased in surgical group (p = 0.021). And R amplitude in V1 derivation was decreased in both groups (Table 5, Figs 1 and 2).

Table 5. Comparison of surface electrocardiography findings between transcatheter and surgical groups before and after defect closure

SD = standard deviation; (b) = before defect closure; (a) = after defect closure; P min = P wave minimum duration; P max = P wave maximum duration; P disp = P wave dispersion; QTc = corrected QT interval; amp = amplitude

* p < 0.05, statistically significant

Figure 1. Comparison of the change in P wave dispersion between groups.

Figure 2. Comparison of the change in R amplitude in V1 between groups.

Discussion

Atrial septal defect is a common CHD and accounts for 13–17% of all CHDs.Reference Reller, Strickland and Riehle-Colarusso15, Reference Schwedler, Lindirger and Lange16 Even though most of patients have no symptoms until adulthood, early diagnosis and treatment of atrial septal defect is important to prevent complications such as pulmonary hypertension, right heart failure, and atrial arrhythmias. Atrial arrhythmias in atrial septal defect result from dilation of atriums, but risk of arrhythmia continues even after closure. It is the most important reason of morbidity and mortality in adult patients with atrial septal defect and operated atrial septal defect patients. P wave dispersion shows the heterogeneous conduction in atrial muscle and gives information about atrial arrhythmias. In several studies, it has been shown that P wave dispersion is increased in patients with atrial septal defect and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Reference Dilaveris and Gialafos7Reference Ho, Chia, Yip and Chan9 Atrial arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, are seen in adulthood in patients with atrial septal defect.Reference Chubb, Whitaker and Williams3, Reference Gatzoulis, Freemann, Siu, Webb and Harris17, Reference Oliver, Gallego, Gonzalez, Benito, Mes and Sobrino18 In our study, we evaluated the risk of atrial arrhythmia by examining P wave dispersion before and after closure, and we aimed to observe the effect of closure on P wave dispersion and thereby atrial arrhythmia between transcatheter and surgical groups.

In our study, the mean age of surgical group (55.7 months) was younger than transcatheter group (82.23 months) (p = 0.007), possibly due to early presentation of symptomatic patients with larger atrial septal defects which are not suitable for transcatheter closure. Other studies had also shown that surgical closure was performed at younger patients.Reference Du, Hijazi and Kleinman10, Reference Villablanca, Briston and Rodés-Cabau12, Reference Butera, Carminati and Chessa19, Reference Mylotte, Quenneville and Kotowycz20

Typical examination findings of atrial septal defect are systolic murmur in pulmonary valve and fixed splitting second heart sound. In our study, 85.25% of patients had physical examination findings. In control group, 40% of patients had heart murmur but all of them were innocent. Geggel and Christensen had examined the patients who had haemodynamically significant atrial septal defect and had closure, and found auscultation signs in more than 90% of the patients.Reference Geggel21, Reference Christensen, Vincent and Campbell22

Cardiomegaly, increased vascularity, and pulmonary congestion can be seen in patients with atrial septal defect. In our study, 67% of patients had increased vascularity and 54% of patients had pulmonary congestion. Cardiothoracic ratio was higher in patients group than control group (p < 0.001). Cardiothoracic ratio was also significantly higher in patients undergone surgery compared to transcatheter group (p = 0.003). We can claim that there is cardiomegaly in patients with atrial septal defect in proportion with increased right ventricular volume and that is why cardiomegaly is more apparent in surgical group. Du et al. have found cardiomegaly in 69.1% of the patients who had transcatheter closure and 76.6% of the patients who had surgical closure; however, this finding was not statistically significant (p = 0.096).Reference Du, Hijazi and Kleinman10

Increased right ventricular volume affects the movements of interventricular septum and causes paradoxical motion.Reference Hung, Uren, Richmond and Kelly23 In this study, while all of surgical group had right heart dilatation, 61.76% of patients in transcatheter group had right heart dilatation (p < 0.001). While there was no septal paradoxical movement in transcatheter group, 14.81% of patients in surgical group had septal paradoxical movement (p = 0.020). Surgery was performed in patients with more right ventricular volume overload. Similarly, Bettencourt et al found that 92% of patients in surgical group and 84% of patients in transcatheter group had right heart dilatation.Reference Bettencourt, Salome´ and Carneiro24 On the contrary, Castaldi et al found no difference among the patients with transcatheter or surgical closure with respect to the ratio of right heart dilatation.Reference Castaldi, Vida and Argiolas25

We found that defect size was larger in surgical group (15.23 ± 7.0 mm) than transcatheter group (12.02 ± 3.41 mm) (p = 0.085). This was not statistically significant. On the other hand, the ratio of defect size to the total septal length was significantly higher in surgical group (0.51 ± 0.17) than transcatheter group (0.034 ± 0.07) (p = 0.002). It is claimed that success rate of the defect closure by transcatheter method is increased significantly if defect size/total septal length ratio is lower than 0.35.Reference Hekmat, Mehlhorn and Rainer de Vivie26Reference Justino28 Closure by transcatheter method is not suitable for patients whose defect size/total septal length ratio is high. We can say that best closure method was chosen for our patients when considered from this point of view.

Anatomical or physiological abnormalities in atrium cause abnormalities on P wave morphology. While first part of P wave represents right atrial depolarisation, last part represents left atrial depolarisation.Reference Hancock, Deal, Mirvis, Okin, Kligfield and Gettes29 Right atrial dilatation in atrial septal defect patients causes an increase in P wave amplitude. In our study, we analysed mean P wave amplitude in D2 derivation and found it higher in patient group than control group (p < 0.001) and in surgical group than transcatheter group (p = 0.216). Sánchez-Cascos et al had also find higher P wave amplitudes in atrial septal defect patients compared to healthy controls.Reference Sánchez-Cascos and Deuchar30

While P wave maximum duration indicates inter-atrial conduction, P wave dispersion indicates heterogeneous conduction within the atriums. We compared the electrocardiographies of patients group before closure and control group. P wave maximum duration was higher in patients group than control group, but contrary to expectations, P wave dispersion was similar in both. In other studies, both P wave maximum duration and P wave dispersion were higher in patients with atrial septal defect than control group.Reference Ho, Chia, Yip and Chan9, Reference Özyılmaz, Özyılmaz and Tola31, Reference Güray, Güray and Yılmaz32

Our study showed mean R amplitude and R/S ratio in V1 and mean S amplitude in V5 were higher in patient group than control group as an indication of right ventricular hypertrophy. Furthermore, mean R amplitude in V1 derivation was higher in surgical group than transcatheter group, mean R amplitude in V5 derivation was lower in surgical group. Depending on these results, we can say that right heart volume overload is higher in patients with atrial septal defect than healthy children and in surgical group than transcatheter group.

When we compared the electrocardiography measurements before and after closure between each patient group, we found that heart rate, mean P wave amplitude in D2, R/S ratio in V1 decreased, and R/S ratio in V5 increased significantly after closure in transcatheter group. While mean P wave amplitude in D2, mean R amplitude in V1, and R/S ratio in V1 decreased, R/S ratio in V5 increased significantly in surgical group after closure. All these findings indicate that right heart volume overload decreased after closure in both groups. There are many other studies denoting the decrease in the right heart volume overload after closure.Reference Castaldi, Vida and Argiolas25, Reference Kaya, Baykan and Dogan2, Reference Patel, Lopez, Banerjee, Joseph, Cao and Hijazi33Reference Du35

When we compared the P wave dispersion before and after closure in each patient group, we found that while mean P wave dispersion decreased in transcatheter group after closure, it increased in surgical group (p = 0.021). There are several studies detecting that mean P wave dispersion decreases after closure. Roushdy et al evaluated the electrocardiographies of 30 children who had defect closure by transcatheter method. They found that mean P wave dispersion decreased after closure and this decrease continued even months after.Reference Roushdy, Attia and Nossir36 Grignani et al had similar results in their study and saw that 25 children with atrial septal defect whose defects were closed by transcatheter method had a decrease in P wave dispersion after 2 months of closure (p < 0.001).Reference Grignani, Tolentino, Rajgor and Quek37 On the other hand, there are studies claiming that there is no change in mean P wave dispersion after closure or moreover showing an increase after closure. Başpınar et al evaluated the electrocardiographies of 31 atrial septal defect patients whose defects were closed by transcatheter method before and 1 year after closure and found no change in mean P wave dispersion.Reference Baspinar, Kervancioglu, Koruk, Kilinc and Irdem38 Paç et al evaluated the electrocardiographies of 121 atrial septal defect patients whose defects were closed by transcatheter method before and just after closure, they detected an increase in mean P wave dispersion from 38.1 ± 2.9 ms to 47.7 ± 3.9 ms (p < 0.001). They concluded that the “foreign body” effect of the device had caused inflammation of the atrial myocardium.Reference Paç, Ballı, Topaloğlu, Ece and Oflaz39 In contrary to our study, Başpınar et al found a decrease in mean P wave dispersion of 27 atrial septal defect patients whose defects were closed by surgery.Reference Baspinar, Sucu, Koruk, Kervancioglu and Ustunsoy6 In Guray’s study, 34 adult patients whose defect closed by surgery were analysed. They divided the patients into two groups according to occurrence of atrial fibrillation after surgery and found that mean P wave dispersion was higher during the first year following surgery in group with atrial fibrillation.Reference Güray, Güray, Mecit, Birhan, Sasmaz and Korkmaz40 In our study, mean P wave dispersion increased after surgical closure. Similarly, Uçak et al found an increase in P wave dispersion between 5 days and 3 months after surgical closure in 101 atrial septal defect patients.Reference Uçak, Temizkan and Ugur41 All these findings implicate that heterogeneous conduction in atriums increases and risk of arrhythmia still exists after surgical closure. The controversial findings between the studies may be related to patient selection for surgery and the duration of follow-up.

Differences in right and left atrial filling may cause differences in P wave dispersion. Left atrial filling is decreased in patients with non-restrictive atrial septal defect because of left-to-right shunt, left and right atrial pressures are equal before closure. Disappearance of the shunt after closure causes an increase in pressure and volume of the left atrium. In small restrictive atrial septal defect, left atrial pressure is higher than right atrium even at the beginning. While there is a decrease in the pressure and volume of right atrium after closure, there is no change in left atrium. The increase in P wave dispersion in our study can be caused by the difference of left atrial filling and tension of left atrial wall. Increase in P wave dispersion can result from the patients whose defect closed surgically had wider, non-restrictive defect.

Even though shunt disappears and dimensions of atriums returns to normal after surgical closure, scar tissues due to surgery, effect of cardiopulmonary by-pass, and previously existing pathological changes in the atriums may cause dysrhythmia. This may be represented as an increase in P wave dispersion. In our study, the decrease in P wave dispersion after closure by transcatheter method may be related to decreased volume overload of the right atrium after closure which causes equalisation of the both atrial wall tensions. After closure volume overload disappeared completely and risk of arrhythmia decreased. There is advantage in transcatheter group in terms of arrhythmia because there is no scar tissue and by-pass effect.

We evaluated the changes in electrocardiographies just 1 month after closure. It is possible that different results may be obtained with a longer duration of follow-up. The process of tissue repair and atrial remodelling may continue after surgery, there may be differences in ventricular compliances by age and the risk of arrhythmia may change by time. The transcatheter and surgical closure groups were not identical because of the nature of the disease and this may have caused another limitation for the study. Further studies with a longer follow-up duration may be helpful and may demonstrate real related rhythm disturbances especially in adulthood.

In conclusion, atrial septal defects may cause atrial repolarisation abnormalities and this effect persists even after surgical closure. Transcatheter closure in childhood may decrease dysrhythmia risk in long-term follow-up.

Acknowledgement

None.

Financial Support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Ethical Standards

The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Marmara University (Protocol number: 09.2018.219, Date: 02.03.2018). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

References

Geva, T, Martins, JD, Wald, RM.Atrial septal defects. Lancet 2014; 383: 19211932 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62145-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaya, MG, Baykan, A, Dogan, A, et al.Intermediate-term effects of transcatheter secundum atrial septal defect closure on cardiac remodelling in children and adults. Pediatr Cardiol 2010; 31: 474482 doi: 10.1007/s00246-009-9623-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, H, Whitaker, J, Williams, SE, et al.Pathophysiology and management of arrhythmias associated with atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale. AER 2014; 3(3): 168172 doi: 10.15420/aer.2014.3.3.168.Google ScholarPubMed
Ueda, A, Adachi, I, McCarthy, KP, et al.Substrates of atrial arrhythmias: histological insights from patients with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168: 24812486.10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts-Thomson, KC, John, B, Worthley, SG, et al.Left atrial remodeling in patients with atrial septal defects. Heart Rhythm 2009; 6: 10001006 doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.03.050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baspinar, O, Sucu, M, Koruk, S, Kervancioglu, M, Ustunsoy, H.P-wave dispersion between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum-type atrial septal defect in childhood. Cardiol Young 2011; 21(1): 1518 doi: 10.1017/S104795111000130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dilaveris, PE, Gialafos, JE.P-wave dispersion: a novel predictor of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2001; 6(2): 159165 doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2001.tb00101.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dilaveris, PE, Gialafos, EJ, Sideris, SK, et al.Simple electrocardiographic markers for the prediction of paroxysmal idiopathic atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 1998; 135: 733738 doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70030-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, TF, Chia, EL, Yip, WC, Chan, KY.Analysis of P wave and P wave dispersion in children with secundum atrial septal defect. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2001; 6(4): 305309 doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2001.tb00123.x.Google ScholarPubMed
Du, ZD, Hijazi, ZM, Kleinman, CS, et al.Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 18361844.10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01862-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, DA, Jones, DA, Radford, DJ, Pohlner, PG.Outcome following surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect. J Paediatr Child Health 2001; 37: 274277.10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00659.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villablanca, PA, Briston, DA, Rodés-Cabau, J, et al.Treatment options for the closure of secundum atrial septal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2017; 241: 149155 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialkowski, J, Karwot, B, Szkutnik, M, Banaszak, P, Kusa, J, Skalski, J.Closure of atrial septal defects in children: surgery versus Amplatzer® Device Implantation. Tex Heart Inst J 2004; 31(3): 220223.Google Scholar
Cowley, CG, Lloyd, TR, Bove, EL, Gaffney, D, Dietrich, M, Rocchini, AP.Comparison of results of closure of secundum atrial septal defect by surgery versus Amplatzer septal occluder. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88(5): 589591. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01750-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reller, MD, Strickland, MJ, Riehle-Colarusso, T, et al.Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998–2005. J Pediatr 2008; 153: 807813 doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.02.059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwedler, G, Lindirger, A, Lange, PE, et al.Frequency and spectrum of congenital heart defects among live births in Germany: a study of the competence network for congenital heart defects. Clin Res Cardiol 2011; 100: 11111117 doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0355-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatzoulis, MA, Freemann, MA, Siu, SC, Webb, GD, Harris, L.Atrial arrhythmia after surgical closure of atrial septal defects in adults. N Engl J Med 1999; 18: 839846 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903183401103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, JM, Gallego, P, Gonzalez, A, Benito, F, Mes, JM, Sobrino, JA.Predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation in atrial septal defect with and without operative closure. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 3943.10.1016/S0002-9149(01)02160-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butera, G, Carminati, M, Chessa, M, et al.Percutaneous versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect: comparison of early results and complications. Am Heart J 2006; 151(1): 228234 doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mylotte, D, Quenneville, SP, Kotowycz, MA, et al.Long-term cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in adults. Int J Cardiol 2014; 172(1): 109114 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geggel, RL.Clinical detection of hemodynamically significant isolated secundum atrial septal defect. J Pediatr 2017; 190: 261–65 doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.07.037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, DD, Vincent, RN, Campbell, RM.Presentation of atrial septal defect in the pediatric population. Pediatr Cardiol 2005; 26: 812814 doi: 10.1007/s00246-005-0969-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hung, J, Uren, RF, Richmond, DR, Kelly, DT.The mechanism of abnormal septal motion in atrial septal defect: pre- and postoperative study by radionuclide ventriculography in adults. Circulation 1981; 63: 142148 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.63.1.142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bettencourt, N, Salome´, N, Carneiro, F, et al.Atrial septal closure in adults: surgery versus amplatzer--comparison of results. Rev Port Cardiol 2003; 22(10): 12031211.Google ScholarPubMed
Castaldi, B, Vida, VL, Argiolas, A, et al.Late electrical and mechanical remodeling after atrial septal defect closure in children: surgical versus percutaneous approach. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100: 181187 doi: 10.1016/j.athorac.sur.2015.03.017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hekmat, K, Mehlhorn, U, Rainer de Vivie, E. Surgical repair of a large residual atrial septal defect after transcatheter closure. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 14561458 doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00096-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oflaz, MB, Pac, FA, Kibar, AE, Balli, S, Ece, I.Evaluation of morphological characteristics of septal rims affecting successful transcatheter atrial septal defect closure in children and adults. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej 2013; 9(3): 205211 doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.37497.Google ScholarPubMed
Justino, H.Transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defects in small children: sound judgment is key! Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva 2013; 21(2): 101102 doi: 10.1590/S2179-83972013000200003.Google Scholar
Hancock, EW, Deal, BJ, Mirvis, DM, Okin, P, Kligfield, P, Gettes, LS.AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of electrocardiogram. Circulation 2009; 119: e251e261 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191097.Google ScholarPubMed
Sánchez-Cascos, A, Deuchar, D.The P wave in atrial septal defect. Br Heart J 1963; 25(2): 202210.10.1136/hrt.25.2.202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özyılmaz, I, Özyılmaz, S, Tola, HT, et al.Holter electrocardiography findings and P-wave dispersion in pediatric patients with transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2014; 19(2): 174181 doi: 10.1111/anec.12104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Güray, U, Güray, Y, Yılmaz, MB, et al.Evaluation of P wave duration and P wave dispersion in adult patients with secundum atrial septal defect during normal sinus rhythm. Int J Cardiol 2003; 91(1): 7579 doi: 10.1016/S0167-5273(02)00598-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, A, Lopez, K, Banerjee, A, Joseph, A, Cao, Q, Hijazi, ZM.Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults ≥ 40 years of age: immediate and follow-up results. J Interv Cardiol 2007; 20: 8288 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00216.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascotto, M, Santoro, G, Cerrato, F, et al.Time-course of cardiac remodeling following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Int J Cardiol 2006; 112(3): 348352 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.10.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, ZD, et al.Speed of normalization of right ventricular volume overload after transcatheter closure. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88(12). doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02135-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roushdy, AM, Attia, H, Nossir, H.Immediate and short term effects of percutaneous atrial septal defect device closure on cardiac electrical remodeling in children. The Egypt Heart J 2018; 70(4): 243247 doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2018.02.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grignani, RT, Tolentino, KM, Rajgor, DD, Quek, SC.Longitudinal evaluation of P-Wave dispersion and P-wave maximum in children after transcatheter device closure of secundum atrial septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol 2015; 36: 10501056 doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1119-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baspinar, O, Kervancioglu, M, Koruk, S, Kilinc, M, Irdem, A.Follow-up P dispersion after transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect in children. J Pak Med Assoc 2014; 64: 546548.Google ScholarPubMed
Paç, FA, Ballı, Ş, Topaloğlu, S, Ece, İ, Oflaz, MB.Analysis of maximum P-wave and dispersion after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects: comparison of two septal occluders. Anatol J Cardiol 2012; 12: 249254 doi: 10.5152/akd.2012.069.Google ScholarPubMed
Güray, U, Güray, Y, Mecit, B, Birhan, Y, Sasmaz, H, Korkmaz, Ş.Maximum P wave duration and P wave dispersion in adult patients with secundum atrial septal defect: the impact of surgical repair. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2004; 9(2): 136141 doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.200492532.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uçak, A, Temizkan, V, Ugur, M, et al.Comparison of primary repair and patch plasty procedure on the P wave in adult atrial septal defect closure. Cardiovasc J Afr 2016; 27(4): 258261 doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of age and weight between patients and control groups

Figure 1

Table 2. Comparison of demographical findings between patients and control groups

Figure 2

Table 3. Comparison of surface electrocardiography findings between patients and control groups

Figure 3

Table 4. Comparison of surface electrocardiography findings between transcatheter and surgical groups before defect closure

Figure 4

Table 5. Comparison of surface electrocardiography findings between transcatheter and surgical groups before and after defect closure

Figure 5

Figure 1. Comparison of the change in P wave dispersion between groups.

Figure 6

Figure 2. Comparison of the change in R amplitude in V1 between groups.