Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T03:41:00.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation of parasite and fungi infection between farmed and wild mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck, 1819) from the Adriatic Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2018

Ines Kovačić*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Educational Sciences, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Zagrebačka 30, HR – 52100 Pula,Croatia Department of Natural and Health Sciences, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Zagrebačka 30, HR – 52100 Pula, Croatia
Emina Pustijanac
Affiliation:
Faculty of Educational Sciences, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Zagrebačka 30, HR – 52100 Pula,Croatia
Andreja Ramšak
Affiliation:
National Institute of Biology, Marine Biology Station Piran, Fornače 41, SLO – 6330 Piran, Slovenia
Dora Šebešćen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Educational Sciences, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Zagrebačka 30, HR – 52100 Pula,Croatia
Sanja Lipić
Affiliation:
Faculty of Educational Sciences, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Zagrebačka 30, HR – 52100 Pula,Croatia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Ines Kovačić, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Zagrebačka 30, HR – 52100 Pula, Croatia email: ikovacic@unipu.hr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigation of parasites and diseases affecting molluscs of ecological and economic interest is critical for the management of native stocks and aquaculture. In recent years, much attention has been devoted to investigating the World Organisation for Animal Health listed infectious diseases, so that communities can be prepared to attend public health emergencies and avoid severe income losses. In this context, the health status of Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck, 1819 was analysed in two aquaculture sites (Strunjan Bay and Piran Bay, Slovenia), and in four natural mussel beds (Adriatic Croatia International Marinas Pula and Rovinj and St Catherine, Croatia; Marina Koper, Slovenia) along the coast of the northern Adriatic Sea. The mussels were sampled in February and April 2014, and processed for histological examination of several endosymbionts and pathogens that frequently occur in mytilid mussels. Endosymbionts and pathogens were not detected in farmed mussels. Prokaryotic inclusion bodies, the protozoan Nematopsis, Ancistrocoma-like ciliates, haplosporidian-like plasmodia, turbellarian Urastoma cyprinae, and basophilic inclusion bodies were observed in digestive gland cryosections of wild mussels from the coastal region of the northern Adriatic. Fungal spores of Psilocybe sp., Ulocladium sp. and Alternaria sp. were detected between the digestive tubules based on their morphology. Diagnostic PCR did not reveal infection with Marteilia refringens during the studied period, neither in wild nor farmed mussels. We confirmed the site effects on prevalence of infected mussels. Thus, we can conclude that wild areas are more exposed to endobionts and parasites than aquaculture sites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2018 

INTRODUCTION

Bivalves constitute a prominent commodity in aquaculture but are also crucial to preserve the complexity and function of ecosystems (Zannella et al., Reference Zannella, Mosca, Mariani, Franci, Folliero, Galdiero, Tiscar and Galdiero2017). Mussels are important suspension filter feeders and thus represent an essential component in the ecology of coastal waters. Mussels are favoured commercially because many species can tolerate and accumulate xenobiotics in their tissues at levels higher than those of the aquatic environment (Torre et al., Reference Torre, Trischitta and Faggio2013b; Faggio et al., Reference Faggio, Pagano, Alampi, Vazzana and Felice2016; Pagano et al., Reference Pagano, Capillo, Sanfilippo, Palato, Trischitta, Manganaro and Faggio2016, Reference Pagano, Porcino, Briglia, Fiorino, Vazzana, Silvestro and Faggio2017; Capillo et al., Reference Capillo, Silvestro, Sanfilippo, Fiorino, Giangrosso, Ferrantelli, Vazzana and Faggio2018). Moreover, since mussels are edible, nutritious, and sessile species, they have been harvested and cultured worldwide for human consumption. Bivalve species of the genus Mytilus are dominant mussels living in the intertidal and subtidal zones, withstanding either more impacted or pristine sites (Roginsky & Lissi, Reference Roginsky and Lissi2005; Hamer et al., Reference Hamer, Korlević, Durmiši, Nerlović and Bierne2012). The Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck, 1819 is an important commercial species in Slovenia and Croatia, in the northern Adriatic Sea, and thus it has been extensively maricultured (Gombač, Reference Gombač2010; Pavičić-Hamer et al., Reference Pavičić-Hamer, Kovačić, Koščica and Hamer2016).

The study of parasites and diseases affecting molluscs with ecological and economic interests is critical for the management of natural stocks and aquaculture (Boehs et al., Reference Boehs, Villalba, Ceuta and Luz2010). The most severe mussel diseases are caused by viruses, bacteria and protistans, which can be responsible for mortality outbreaks, thus posing a substantial commercial impact (Tuntiwaranuruk et al., Reference Tuntiwaranuruk, Chalermwat, Pongsakchat, Meepool, Upatham and Kruatrachue2008; Ceuta & Boehs, Reference Ceuta and Boehs2012; Mladineo et al., Reference Mladineo, Petrić, Hrabar, Bočina and Peharda2012). To a lesser extent, other diseases are caused by ciliates, turbellarians (Cova et al., Reference Cova, Serafim Júnior, Boehs and Souza2015), trematodes (Özer & Güneydağ, Reference Özer and Güneydağ2015) and fungi (Santos et al., Reference Santos, Hauser-Davis, Santos and De Simone2017). The spread of fungal strains may be facilitated by a combination of environmental conditions, such as wind or human-conveyed propagules (Sallenave-Namont et al., Reference Sallenave-Namont, Pouchus, Robiou du Pont, Lassus and Verbist2000). Fungi can also be present in the marine environment in latent forms on host organisms or potential symptomless carriers (Ein-Gil et al., Reference Ein-Gil, Ilan, Carmeli, Smith, Pawlik and Yarden2009).

According to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), notifiable diseases are those with socioeconomic and/or public health importance within countries or that are significant for the international trade of aquatic animals and their products (Aranguren & Figueras, Reference Aranguren and Figueras2016). The current list of notifiable diseases of bivalves and the causative pathogens includes infection with Marteilia refringens, Bonamia sp., Xenohaliotis californiensis and Perkinsus sp. (Carnegie et al., Reference Carnegie, Arzul and Bushek2016).

The increased use of coastal areas and the sea due to expansion in urbanization, population growth and tourism associated with the intense traffic of tourist vessels and maritime transport have detrimental effects on the health status of bivalves (Burgos-Aceves and Faggio, Reference Burgos-Aceves and Faggio2017; Savorelli et al., Reference Savorelli, Manfra, Croppo, Tornambè, Palazzi, Canepa, Trentini, Cicero and Faggio2017; Burgos-Aceves et al., Reference Burgos-Aceves, Cohen, Smith and Faggio2018; Faggio et al., Reference Faggio, Tsarpali and Dailianis2018). Studies have shown that environmental factors including poor water quality and the presence of parasites can impact the health status of mussel stocks in the UK (Bignell et al., Reference Bignell, Dodge, Feist, Lyons, Martin, Taylor, Stone, Travalent and Stentiford2008; Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014). A decrease in water quality can affect the immunological response in aquatic organisms thus making them more susceptible to parasitic infection and increasing parasite prevalence (Khan, Reference Khan1991). It becomes evident that particular attention coupled with protective measures are needed both for native and cultured mussel stocks.

The study of pathogens from different mussel populations in response to regional differences is a subject of major interest, particularly in aquaculture, where mussels originate from various sources (Bratoš et al., Reference Bratoš, Glamuzina and Benović2004; Pavičić-Hamer et al., Reference Pavičić-Hamer, Kovačić, Koščica and Hamer2016). The objectives of this study are (a) to investigate the health status of mussels on the northern Adriatic coast (Croatia and Slovenia) concerning effects of on-site water quality; (b) to identify the range of parasites and fungi present in aquaculture and wild areas and the possible route of exposure; and (c) to evaluate the health status of mussels and their likely high infection risks due to detrimental effects of pollutants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of mussels and description of sampling sites

Mussels were collected from six sampling stations (N = 10 per station) along the coast of the northern Adriatic, in Slovenia and Croatia (Figure 1), during February and April 2014. Strunjan Bay (45°16′24″N 13°34'57″'E) and Piran Bay (45°07′50″N 13°44′10″E) harbour the most important Slovenian aquaculture sites, which are located 11.4 km and 20.6 km away from Koper, respectively. The mussel farm in Strunjan Bay (site code 0024) is inside a natural reserve (Krajinski park Strunjan), and the mussel farm near to Seča (site code 0035) is located in the inner part of Piran Bay. The third sampling site was close to the Marina Koper in Slovenia (site code 00TM), where mussels were collected from a natural bed in the vicinity. The two other impacted sites are Adriatic Croatia International Marinas (ACI), the ACI Marina Pula (44°87′55″N 13°84'67″E) and ACI Marina Rovinj (45°04′32″N 13°38′08″E). They are located near a sewage outflow and boat processing area characterized by elevated pollutant concentration in biota and sediment (Center for Marine Research, 2014). St Catherine Island in Croatia (45°07′67″N 13°62′96″E) is located ~5 km away from the urban and sewage outflow area and is considered a non-impacted environment (Bihari et al., Reference Bihari, Mičić, Fafanđel, Hamer, Jakšić and Batel2004; Center for Marine Research, 2014). Environmental parameters were measured with an MSS 90 multiparameter probe (Sea & Sun Technology), at 2 m depth at the time of sampling using standard procedures (ARSO, 2014; Center for Marine Research, 2014) (Table 1).

Fig. 1. Geographic location of the sampling areas and source of mussels in the northern Adriatic Sea (Slovenia and Croatia).

Table 1. Environmental parameters estimated for the sampling sites during February and April in 2014, measured at 2 m depth.

Histopathology

Ten mussels from each station per month were sampled and immediately transported to the laboratory where digestive glands were removed, fixed with n-hexane, and cooled in liquid nitrogen. The digestive glands were placed in a straight row on aluminium cryostat chucks (five per chuck). The chucks were stored at −80°C until analysis. Before cryosectioning, the samples were embedded in O.C.T.™ compound (Microm Inc. GmbH, Germany) and cut into 10 µm sections with a cryostat (Zeiss Hyrax C 50, Microm GmbH, Germany). Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Parasite morphology was studied using a light microscope (Nikon, UK). Authorities for parasite and endobionts identification included Vázquez & Cremonte (Reference Vázquez and Cremonte2017) for prokaryotic and basophilic inclusion bodies; Francisco et al. (Reference Francisco, Hermida and Santos2010), Cova et al. (Reference Cova, Serafim Júnior, Boehs and Souza2015) and Tuntiwaranuruk et al. (Reference Tuntiwaranuruk, Chalermwat, Pongsakchat, Meepool, Upatham and Kruatrachue2008) for Nematopsis sp., Ancistrocoma-like ciliates, and turbellarian Urastoma cyprinae von Graff, 1882; Bignell et al. (Reference Bignell, Dodge, Feist, Lyons, Martin, Taylor, Stone, Travalent and Stentiford2008) for haplosporidian-like plasmodia; and Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, Mu, Feng, Kang, Zhang, Gu, Wang, Ma and Zhu2009) for fungi. All micrographs were captured using an Ikegami ICD-803P digital video camera and the Lim Screen Measurement™ Lucia G image capture system (Nikon, UK).

Following Saffo (Reference Saffo1992), we used the term ‘infection’ in referring to all organisms parasitically and endobiotically associated with their hosts. The prevalence and intensity of infection of each parasite were calculated according to Bush et al. (Reference Bush, Lafferty, Lotz and Shostak1997), as follows: the prevalence is the number of individuals infected divided by the total number of individuals in a sample, expressed as a percentage; the intensity is the number of parasites found in an infected mussel.

Diagnostic detection of M. refringens by PCR

Infection by M. refringens was surveyed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For this, a small piece of the mussel digestive gland of each collected individual was preserved in 95% ethanol. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After isolation, DNA samples were amplified in a SureCycler 8800 Thermal Cycler (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA) using standard primers for the M. refringens DNA, M2A (5′- CCGCACACGTTCTTCACTCC-3′); M3AS (5′-CTCGAGTTTCGACAGACG-3′), according to the protocol by Le Roux et al. (Reference Le Roux, Lorenzo, Peyret, Audemard, Figueras, Vivarès, Gouy and Berthe2001). The presence of PCR products was verified by agarose gel (1.5% w/v) electrophoresis.

Statistical analysis

The relationship between prevalence and sampling site and time was evaluated by a Chi-square test. The relationship between the intensity of infection and sampling site and time was assessed by a Kruskal–Wallis test. All tests were performed with Statistica 9.0. software at significance P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Along the coast of the northern Adriatic Sea, mussels were sampled from six sites in Croatia and Slovenia that were previously evaluated and classified as aquaculture sites (Strunjan Bay and Piran Bay, Slovenia), non-impacted sites (St Catherine, Croatia), and impacted sites (Marina Koper, Slovenia; ACI Pula and ACI Rovinj, Croatia).

No significant infections, i.e. parasites that cause significant mortalities or heavy infestations, were observed in situ during the study. Histological and molecular analyses did not show any evidence of the presence of M. refringens, an OIE-listed pathogen. The most common pathogens found in mussels from the impacted and non-impacted sites were haplosporidian-like organisms, prokaryotic inclusion bodies, Ancistrocoma-like ciliates, Nematopsis sp. and the turbellarian U. cyprinae (Figure 2). Filamentous fungi of Ulocladium sp., Psylocibe sp. and Alternaria sp. were detected in mussels from St Catherine, ACI Pula, ACI Rovinj (Croatia) and Marina Koper (Slovenia), but not from aquaculture sites (Figure 3). The number of parasite groups per site was higher in impacted sites (N = 9) compared with non-impacted (N = 1) and cultivation (N = 0) sites.

Fig. 2. Light microscopy of transverse cryosections through the mussel digestive gland of Mytilus galloprovincialis containing: (a) basophilic prokaryote-like organisms (arrow) in the lumen of the digestive gland; (b) eosinophilic prokaryote-like organisms (arrow) in the lumen of the digestive gland; (c) plasmodia (arrow) of a haplosporidian-like organism in the digestive tubule epithelium; (d) host phagocyte containing three Nematopsis sp. oocysts in the connective tissue between the digestive tubules; (e) Urastoma cyprinae (arrow) and Ancistrocoma-like ciliate (arrowhead) at the edge of the digestive gland and digestive tubules; (f) Ancistrocoma-like ciliate (arrow) in the lumen of digestive tubule.

Fig. 3. Light microscopy of the transverse cryosections through the mussel digestive gland of Mytilus galloprovincialis containing spores of (a) Psilocybe sp.; (b) Ulocladium sp.; and (c) Alternaria sp. attached to the digestive tubules.

Specimens of a haplosporidian-like organism were detected in mussels from Koper (10% prevalence of infection). Plasmodia of haplosporidian-like organisms were spread into the epithelium of digestive tubules with more than 100 plasmodia per section (at 100× magnification).

Prokaryotic inclusion bodies that were spherical to oval shaped with basophilic structures 5–10 µm in size were found in the digestive tubules and between them (Figure 2a). In some cases, spherical inclusions were eosinophilic stained (Figure 2b). Their prevalence ranged from 10% (ACI Pula, February 2014) to 40% (ACI Pula, April 2014). A 30% prevalence was detected in all the other infected mussels (Table 2). The intensity of infection ranged between one and 12 prokaryotic inclusion bodies per section (Table 2). The site influenced both prevalence (χ2 = 6.66, df = 2, P < 0.05) and intensity of infection (Kruskal–Wallis test, H = 6.32, P < 0.05, Table 4).

Table 2. Prevalence (P) and intensity of infection (I) with the range in parentheses of prokaryotic inclusion bodies, Nematopsis sp., and Ancistrocoma-like ciliates from Mytilus galloprovincialis mussels collected in the northern Adriatic Sea.

Table 3. Prevalence (P) and intensity of infection (I) with the range in parentheses of the fungi Psilocybe sp. and Ulocladium sp. from Mytilus galloprovincialis mussels collected in the northern Adriatic Sea.

Table 4. Effect of sampling time and site on the prevalence and level of infection of parasites and fungi in mussels from the northern Adriatic Sea.

Significant difference (P) of χ2 test for the prevalence and Kruskal–Wallis test (H) for the intensity of infection.

Specimens of Nematopsis sp. with ungrouped and grouped oocysts were detected in the connective tissue between digestive tubules of mussels from non-impacted and impacted sites (Figure 2c). A single thickened membrane was bounding oocysts with a basophilic vermiform sporozoite inside. In infected mussels sampled in April 2014, the prevalence ranged from 20% (St Catherine and ACI Pula) to 80% (ACI Rovinj) (Table 2). In February 2014, ACI Rovinj had the highest prevalence of infection with Nematopsis sp. (80% prevalence). The intensity of infection was variable, with < 15 oocysts per section in most of the cases (maximum 47 oocysts/mussel). Prevalence (χ2 = 6.00, df = 2, P < 0.05) and intensity of infection (Kruskal–Wallis test, H = 9.18, P < 0.05) were significantly different between sampling sites (Table 4).

Specimens of the turbellarian U. cyprinae (10% prevalence) were observed at the edge of the digestive gland from mussels sampled in ACI Pula (Figure 2e).

In mussels from the same sampling site, oval-shaped Ancistrocoma-like ciliates, characterized by a ciliary fringe and a basophilic horse-shoe shaped nucleus, were observed (Figure 2f). Prevalence of Ancistrocoma-like ciliates in wild mussels ranged from 10% (Marina Koper, ACI Pula, ACI Rovinj, February 2014) to 20% (ACI Pula, April 2014) (Table 1), with an intensity of infection from 1 to 2. Site influenced both prevalence (χ2 = 8.57, df = 2, P < 0.05) and intensity of infection (Kruskal–Wallis test, H = 7.50, P < 0.05).

The fungi were observed in digestive glands of wild mussels. Alternaria sp. individuals (10% prevalence) were found within the connective tissue in mussel digestive gland from mussels sampled in Marina Koper (Figure 3a). Spores of Psilocybe sp. were recorded in the epithelial cells of the digestive tubules in the mussel digestive gland from mussels of impacted sites. Prevalence ranged from 10% (ACI Rovinj, April 2014) to 30% (Marina Koper, February 2014). We observed specimens of Ulocladium sp. (10% prevalence) inside the digestive tubules of mussels from impacted (Marina Koper and ACI Rovinj in February) and non-impacted (St Catherine) sites in both months. The intensity of infection was low (up to five spores per section). No significant difference in the prevalence of fungi (P > 0.05) was observed between cultured and wild mussels.

DISCUSSION

A diversity of endobionts and parasites was observed in cryosections of wild mussels from the northern Adriatic Sea, including Ancistroma sp., Nematopsis sp., U. cyprinae, and fungi Ulocladium sp., Psylocibe sp. and Alternaria sp. One of the most devastating pathologies in mussels, infection with M. refringens, an OIE-listed disease, was not detected by diagnostic PCR in mussels from the northern Adriatic during this survey. There was a significant difference between sites (impacted, non-impacted and aquaculture sites) concerning parasite infection. Histological examination of paraffin-embedded tissue sections is considered to be the standard screening diagnostic method. We identified parasites and endobionts in cryosections since this method preserves the tissue as close as possible to its natural state (Kovačić & Pustijanac, Reference Kovačić and Pustijanac2017). Nowadays, for detection of parasites causing OIE-listed diseases, more specific and sensitive molecular diagnostic techniques have been used (Aranguren & Figueras, Reference Aranguren and Figueras2016). For a presumptive diagnosis of a disease, the standard method is histopathology, but for confirmatory diagnosis, the standard methods are PCR and DNA sequencing. As the result of adopting European legislation for monitoring diseases according to OIE on shellfish farms in Slovenia, analyses of M. refringens in Mediterranean mussels was established from 2004 (Gombač, Reference Gombač2010). Marteilia refringens ciliates were detected in mussels from Slovenian aquaculture sites in recent years, at intensities that would cause significant pathologies (Gombač et al., Reference Gombač, Kušar, Ocepek, Pogačnik, Arzul, Couraleau and Jenčič2014). At the time of our study, cultured Mediterranean mussels were free from M. refringens. This protozoan is widespread from the Atlantic Ocean to the Persian Gulf (Bower et al., Reference Bower, McGladdery and Price1994) and has also been detected in the northern Adriatic Sea (Zrnčić et al., Reference Zrnčić, Le Roux, Oraić, Sostarić and Berthe2001; Gombač et al., Reference Gombač, Kušar, Ocepek, Pogačnik, Arzul, Couraleau and Jenčič2014). A haplosporidian-like organism was found in M. galloprovincialis from only one site (ACI Pula, Croatia). Multinucleated plasmodia were observed in Mytilus edulis, M. galloprovincialis and their hybrids from Southampton Water, Hampshire, and the Exe River, Devon in the UK (Bignell et al., Reference Bignell, Dodge, Feist, Lyons, Martin, Taylor, Stone, Travalent and Stentiford2008). Besides, a haplosporidian infection in Mytilus sp. from the Exe River estuary and Southampton Water was described in 2004 and 2005 (Bignell et al., Reference Bignell, Dodge, Feist, Lyons, Martin, Taylor, Stone, Travalent and Stentiford2008). However, in the northern Adriatic Sea, this is the first record of a haplosporidian-like organism in mussels.

In our study, prokaryotic inclusion bodies were found infecting epithelial cells or the lumen of the digestive tubule in mussels from the Northern Adriatic, similarly to their detection in several bivalve species (Cova et al., Reference Cova, Serafim Júnior, Boehs and Souza2015; Vázquez & Cremonte, Reference Vázquez and Cremonte2017). They occurred as small rounded intracellular basophilic colonies, evoking the lysis of infected cells of the digestive tubule. In some cases, colonies caused the lysis of the infected cells and were released from the lumen of the tubule into organs of bivalves (Vázquez & Cremonte, Reference Vázquez and Cremonte2017), as we detected in this study. In the host tissue, the parasites can be associated with an entry mechanism via food particle capture (Queiroga et al., Reference Queiroga, Vianna, Vieira, Farias and Da Silva2015). In these cases, granulocytes can cross the digestive epithelium reaching the lumen of the gut where they capture and digest food particles, and cross back transporting nutrients to bivalve tissues (Torre et al., Reference Torre, Trischitta, Corsaro, Mallamace and Faggio2013a, Reference Torre, Trischitta and Faggiob; Matozzo et al., Reference Matozzo, Pagano, Spinelli, Caicci and Faggio2016; Sehonova et al., Reference Sehonova, Svobodova, Dolezelova, Vosmerova and Faggio2018). Moreover, some inclusions detected in our study were coated by an eosinophilic fibrous cover, which is interpreted as an encapsulation response by the host (Gulka & Chang, Reference Gulka and Chang1985). Despite their intracellularity being unclear, these inclusions were reported as Rickettsia-like (RLOs) and Chlamydia-like organisms (Vázquez & Cremonte, Reference Vázquez and Cremonte2017).

In our study, Ancistrocoma-like ciliates occurred on the surface of the digestive gland and in the lumen of the tubule. Ancistrocoma-like ciliates are presumed to be ubiquitous in many species of bivalves (Adlard et al., Reference Adlard and Chollet2003; Rayyan et al., Reference Rayyan, Damianidis, Antoniadou and Chintiroglou2006). Most of them are extracellular and found in the lumen of the digestive gland tubules in the intestine. Some ciliates may be attached to or located near the gills, mantle and labial palps (Sphenophrya-like, Trichodina sp., Ancistrum-like). Although ciliates are mostly harmless and commensals, the intracellular ciliates that are Sphenophrya-like and Rhynchodid-like can disrupt the epithelia of the digestive tubule of M. edulis (Adlard et al., Reference Adlard and Chollet2003).

Our histological examination revealed Nematopsis sp. in the form of a single or numerous dense oocysts. Mladineo (Reference Mladineo2008) also found a high prevalence of Nematopsis sp. in the horse-bearded mussel Modiolus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758 in Mali Ston (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). Urastoma cyprinae turbellarians were found in low prevalence in our study, as was similarly observed in M. galloprovincialis from Baja California, north-west Mexico (Caceres-Martinez et al., Reference Caceres-Martinez, Vasquez-Yeomans and Sluys1998) and from the Black Sea coast at Sinop, Turkey (Özer & Güneydağ, Reference Özer and Güneydağ2015). Moreover, low prevalence of U. cyprinae was found in the mangrove oyster Crassostrea rhizophorae (Guilding, 1828) in the estuary of the Graciosa River in Taperoá, Bahia State, north-east Brazil (Cova et al., Reference Cova, Serafim Júnior, Boehs and Souza2015). Specimens of U. cyprinae are usually found among the gill filaments. However, we found them at the edge of the mussel digestive gland, like in a previous study (Kovačić & Pustijanac, Reference Kovačić and Pustijanac2017).

The results obtained in our study include the first record of fungal spores of Ulocladium sp., Psylocibe sp. and Alternaria sp. in M. galloprovincialis in the northern Adriatic Sea (Croatia). Epibiotic and endobiotic fungi live on the surface and in the inner tissues of many invertebrates and algae (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Mu, Feng, Kang, Zhang, Gu, Wang, Ma and Zhu2009). Filamentous fungi were found to be associated with several wild and farmed bivalves and are potentially toxic (Zvereva et al., Reference Zvereva, Zvyagintsev and Ivin2012; Borzykh & Zvereva, Reference Borzykh and Zvereva2015; Santos et al., Reference Santos, Hauser-Davis, Santos and De Simone2017). Besides, fungal spores were abundant in salts from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (Biango-Daniels & Hodge, Reference Biango-Daniels and Hodge2018).

In this study, the sampling site influenced the diversity and abundance of parasites present in mussels. Mussels from impacted sites (marinas and port) were more infected in comparison to mussels from the non-impacted and aquaculture sites. An association of parasite diversity and their abundance with impacted polluted sites has been observed in many studies (Aarab et al., Reference Aarab, Pampanin, Nævdal, Øysæd, Gastaldi and Bechmann2008; Bignell et al., Reference Bignell, Dodge, Feist, Lyons, Martin, Taylor, Stone, Travalent and Stentiford2008; Morley, Reference Morley2010; Bignell et al., Reference Bignell, Stentiford, Taylor and Lyons2011), because mussels are under physiological stress and thus are susceptible to infection. Several pathogens affect cell morphology and tissue architecture, leading to altered physiological functions especially during massive infections. This is especially pronounced in the mussel digestive gland, where infection with parasites leads to considerable displacement of the digestive epithelium with individual parasites occupying much of the cytoplasm of the digestive cells, thus increasing sensitivity to the impact of pollutants (Bignell et al., Reference Bignell, Dodge, Feist, Lyons, Martin, Taylor, Stone, Travalent and Stentiford2008). Moreover, pollution is often associated with a decrease in dissolved oxygen, which creates a favourable environment for bacteria and viruses, while inert suspended solids can damage the tissue epithelium and make individuals more susceptible to infection with fungi (Svobodová et al., Reference Svobodová, Richard, Jana and Blanka1993; Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014). The dissolved oxygen together with the pollution could be the parameters that most influenced parasite and fungi diversity at sampling sites in Croatia. All the sampling sites (two aquaculture and four wild) along the Slovenian and Croatian coastlines were included in biomonitoring programmes in previous years. The site Marina Koper is near to Port Koper and is characterized by elevated pollutant concentrations in biota and sediment compared with mussel farms (Ramšak et al., Reference Ramšak, Ščančar and Horvat2012; Tsangaris et al., Reference Tsangaris, Moschino, Strogyloudi, Coatu, Ramšak, Abu, Rana Carvalho, Kosyan, Lazarou, Hatzianestis, Oros and Tiganus2016). Likewise, ACI Pula and ACI Rovinj were characterized by elevated pollutant concentration in biota and sediment compared with mussel farms in Croatia (Kanduč et al., Reference Kanduč, Šlejkovec, Falnoga, Mori, Budič, Kovačić, Pavičić-Hamer and Hamer2018). Seasonal changes in metal concentration (Se, Cu, Pb, Cd, As and Zn) in mussels and metallothionein content did not reveal significant differences between sites in Slovenia (Ramšak et al., Reference Ramšak, Ščančar and Horvat2012; Tsangaris et al., Reference Tsangaris, Moschino, Strogyloudi, Coatu, Ramšak, Abu, Rana Carvalho, Kosyan, Lazarou, Hatzianestis, Oros and Tiganus2016). On the other hand, significant differences in metal concentrations (Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se, Cd and Pb) were found in mussels from polluted sites along the Croatian coastline (Kanduč et al., Reference Kanduč, Šlejkovec, Falnoga, Mori, Budič, Kovačić, Pavičić-Hamer and Hamer2018). Values of bioconcentration factors (BCF) for metals were below the maximum values recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA, 2004), and no differences were found when investigating the genotoxicity of seawater by micronuclei frequency on Slovenian sites (Kristan et al., Reference Kristan, Kanduč, Osterc, Šlejkovec, Ramšak and Stibilj2014). No signs of organic pollution from sewage were confirmed in the mussels from investigated sites in Slovenia (Kristan et al., Reference Kristan, Kanduč, Osterc, Šlejkovec, Ramšak and Stibilj2014) and Croatia (Kanduč et al., Reference Kanduč, Šlejkovec, Falnoga, Mori, Budič, Kovačić, Pavičić-Hamer and Hamer2018), measured as isotopic composition of carbon (δ13C) vs nitrogen (δ15N) in mussel tissue. Moreover, biochemical biomarkers (catalase, GST activity and AChE) confirmed stress in mussels from sampled sites in Slovenia (Tsangaris et al., Reference Tsangaris, Moschino, Strogyloudi, Coatu, Ramšak, Abu, Rana Carvalho, Kosyan, Lazarou, Hatzianestis, Oros and Tiganus2016). In contrast to the wild sites, no significant parasites and/or pathogens were found in mussels from Slovenian aquaculture sites in the northern Adriatic, in this study. Natural characteristics of the northern Adriatic Sea in addition to aquaculture activities such as collecting mussel seeds from surrounding wild areas and/or Italian areas could pose risks of spreading parasites in such small, protected coastal regions as the Strunjan Bay and Piran Bay (Gombač et al., Reference Gombač, Kušar, Ocepek, Pogačnik, Arzul, Couraleau and Jenčič2014). Mussel seeds are collected from native beds or collector ropes and transferred to aquaculture areas for on-growing (FAO, 2015). Occasionally, small quantities of mussel seeds are bought in Italy (Gombač, Reference Gombač2010). Moreover, because water currents generally flow from the south along with the Istrian coast and turn west along the Slovenian coast (Bricelj & Rejec Brancelj, Reference Bricelj and Rejec Brancelj2009), they can transport parasites preferentially northwards (Kovačić et al., Reference Kovačić, Pavičić-Hamer, Pfannkuchen and Usich2016) to the aquaculture areas in the northern Adriatic, particularly during winter and early spring. Moreover, the tides in the Gulf of Trieste are very high for the Mediterranean Sea and the difference between low and high tides can reach more than 180 centimetres, representing the largest tidal range in the Adriatic Sea (Bricelj & Rejec Brancelj, Reference Bricelj and Rejec Brancelj2009). Tides could transfer the parasites with indirect life cycles from hosts living at the bottom to their intermediate hosts, such as bivalves (Boehs et al., Reference Boehs, Villalba, Ceuta and Luz2010). Since the transmission route of parasite infection can vary (Cable et al., Reference Cable, Barber, Boag, Ellison, Morgan, Murray, Pascoe, Sait, Wilson and Booth2017), we decided to perform a study in which farmed and wild Mediterranean mussels were collected in late winter and early spring.

During this study, farmed mussels from two protected areas in Slovenia were free of endobionts and parasites. This may indicate that aquaculture areas are somehow protected against infection, at the same time that they are protected from transfer of endobionts and parasites by natural water currents or translocation of mussels, at least for now. Although wild mussels from Croatian and Slovenian coasts were infected with a high diversity of parasites and fungi, they did not present infection with M. refringens, an OIE-listed disease pathogen.

Finally, a variety of stressors in these coastal communities coupled with different modes of species translocation (e.g. ballast water, wind dispersion) and climate change may further impact parasite dynamics. These relationships need to be further evaluated, particularly regarding the OIE-listed diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Assist. Prof. Vedrana Nerlović and Dr Lorena Perić from the Ruđer Bošković Institut, Center for Marine Research, Croatia, for mussel sampling.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

The Croatian Ministry of Science and Education partly funded this study through project No. 098-0982705-2725 (grant to Dr Nevenka Bihari). The work of Andreja Ramšak was financed by the P1-0203 Coastal Sea Research program, Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS), Slovenia.

References

REFERENCES

Aarab, N., Pampanin, D.M., Nævdal, A., Øysæd, K.B., Gastaldi, L. and Bechmann, R.K. (2008) Histopathology alterations and histochemistry measurements in mussel, Mytilus edulis collected offshore from an aluminium smelter industry (Norway). Marine Pollution Bulletin 57, 569574.Google Scholar
Adlard, R.D., Chollet, B., Institut français de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer, European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection and International Office of Epizootics (2003) Histology and anatomo-pathology of molluscs: a guide for diagnosticians. La Tremblade: Ifremer.Google Scholar
Aranguren, R. and Figueras, A. (2016) Moving from histopathology to molecular tools in the diagnosis of molluscs diseases of concern under EU legislation. Frontiers in Physiology 7, 538.Google Scholar
ARSO 2014 Common database on monitoring of water quality data. Ljubljana: Environmental Agency of the Republic of Slovenia.Google Scholar
Biango-Daniels, M.N. and Hodge, K.T. (2018) Sea salts as a potential source of food spoilage fungi. Food Microbiology, 69, 8995.Google Scholar
Bignell, J.P., Dodge, M.J., Feist, S.W., Lyons, B., Martin, P.D., Taylor, N.G.H., Stone, D., Travalent, L. and Stentiford, G.D. (2008) Mussel histopathology: effects of season, disease and species. Aquatic Biology 2, 115.Google Scholar
Bignell, J.P., Stentiford, G.D., Taylor, N.G.H. and Lyons, B.P. (2011) Histopathology of mussels (Mytilus sp.) from the Tamar estuary, UK. Marine Environmental Research 72, 2532.Google Scholar
Bihari, N., Mičić, M., Fafanđel, M., Hamer, B., Jakšić, Ž. and Batel, R. (2004) Seawater quality of Adriatic coast, Croatia, based on toxicity, genotoxicity and DNA integrity assay. Acta Adriatica 45, 7581.Google Scholar
Boehs, G., Villalba, A., Ceuta, L.O. and Luz, J.R. (2010) Parasites of three commercially exploited bivalve mollusc species of the estuarine region of the Cachoeira river (Ilheus, Bahia, Brazil). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 103, 4347.Google Scholar
Borzykh, O.G. and Zvereva, L.V. (2015) Mycobiota of the bivalve mollusk Anadara broughtoni (Schrenck, 1867) from various parts of Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 41, 321323.Google Scholar
Bower, S.M., McGladdery, S.E. and Price, I.M. (1994) Synopsis of infectious diseases and parasites of commercially exploited shellfish. Annual Review of Fish Diseases 4(Supplement C), 1199.Google Scholar
Bratoš, A., Glamuzina, B. and Benović, A. (2004) Hrvatsko školjkarstvo – prednosti i ograničenja (Croatian shellfisheries aquaculture - advantages and disadvantages). Naše More 51, 5962.Google Scholar
Bricelj, M. and Rejec Brancelj, I. (2009) Integrated coastal zone management: case study on the Slovenian Mediterranean=Celovito upravljanje obalnega obmocja. Varstvo narave 22, 4762.Google Scholar
Burgos-Aceves, M.A. and Faggio, C. (2017) An approach to the study of the immunity functions of bivalve haemocytes: physiology and molecular aspects. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 67, 513517.Google Scholar
Burgos-Aceves, M.A., Cohen, A., Smith, Y. and Faggio, C. (2018) A potential microRNA regulation of immune-related genes in invertebrate haemocytes. Science of the Total Environment 621, 302307.Google Scholar
Bush, A.O., Lafferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M. and Shostak, A.W. (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575583.Google Scholar
Cable, J., Barber, I., Boag, B., Ellison, A.R., Morgan, E.R., Murray, K., Pascoe, E.L., Sait, S.M., Wilson, A.J. and Booth, M. (2017) Global change, parasite transmission and disease control: lessons from ecology. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society B 372, 20160088.Google Scholar
Caceres-Martinez, J., Vasquez-Yeomans, R. and Sluys, R. (1998) The turbellarian Urastoma cyprinae from edible mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis and Mytilus californianus in Baja California, NW Mexico. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 72, 214219.Google Scholar
Capillo, G., Silvestro, S., Sanfilippo, M., Fiorino, E., Giangrosso, G., Ferrantelli, V., Vazzana, I. and Faggio, C. (2018) Assessment of electrolytes and metals profile of the Faro Lake (Capo Peloro Lagoon, Sicily, Italy) and its impact on Mytilus galloprovincialis. Chemistry and Biodiversity 15, 1800044. doi 10.1002/cbdv.201800044.Google Scholar
Carnegie, R.B., Arzul, I. and Bushek, D. (2016) Managing marine mollusc diseases in the context of regional and international commerce: policy issues and emerging concerns. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371, 20150215.Google Scholar
Ceuta, L.O. and Boehs, G. (2012) Parasites of the mangrove mussel Mytella guyanensis (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) in Camamu Bay, Bahia, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 72, 421427.Google Scholar
Cova, A.W., Serafim Júnior, M., Boehs, G. and Souza, J.M.d. (2015) Parasites in the mangrove oyster Crassostrea rhizophorae cultivated in the estuary of the Graciosa River in Taperoá, Bahia. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária 24, 2127.Google Scholar
Ein-Gil, N., Ilan, M., Carmeli, S., Smith, G.W., Pawlik, J.R. and Yarden, O. (2009) Presence of Aspergillus sydowii, a pathogen of gorgonian sea fans in the marine sponge Spongia obscura. ISME Journal 3, 752755.Google Scholar
Faggio, C., Pagano, M., Alampi, R., Vazzana, I. and Felice, M.R. (2016) Cytotoxicity, haemolymphatic parameters, and oxidative stress following exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of Quaternium-15 in Mytilus galloprovincialis. Aquatic Toxicology 180, 258265.Google Scholar
Faggio, C., Tsarpali, V. and Dailianis, S. (2018) Mussel digestive gland as a model for assessing xenobiotics: an overview. Science of the Total Environment 636, 220229.Google Scholar
FAO (2015) National aquaculture sector overview. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Center for Marine Research (2014) Coastal Cities Pollution project 2. Final report. Center for Marine Research.Google Scholar
Francisco, C.J., Hermida, M.A. and Santos, M.J. (2010) Parasites and symbionts from Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamark, 1819) (Bivalves: Mytilidae) of the Aveiro estuary Portugal. Journal of Parasitology 96, 200205.Google Scholar
Gombač, M. (2010) Protozoan infestation dynamics and occurrence of neoplasias in digestive gland of Mediterranean mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) in Slovene Sea in correlation with sea temperature, salinity and oxygenation. PhD thesis. Ljubljana University, Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google Scholar
Gombač, M., Kušar, D., Ocepek, M., Pogačnik, M., Arzul, I., Couraleau, Y. and Jenčič, V. (2014) Marteiliosis in mussels: a rare disease? Journal of Fish Diseases 37, 805814.Google Scholar
Gulka, G. and Chang, P.W. (1985) Pathogenicity and infectivity of a rickettsia-like organism in the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus. Journal of Fish Diseases 8, 309318.Google Scholar
Hamer, B., Korlević, M., Durmiši, E., Nerlović, V. and Bierne, N. (2012) Nuclear marker Me 15-16 analyses of Mytilus galloprovincialis populations along the eastern Adriatic coast. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 53, 35.Google Scholar
Kanduč, T., Šlejkovec, Z., Falnoga, I., Mori, N., Budič, B., Kovačić, I., Pavičić-Hamer, D. and Hamer, B. (2018) Environmental status of the NE Adriatic Sea, Istria, Croatia: Insights from mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis condition indices, stable isotopes and metal(loid)s. Marine Pollution Bulletin 126, 525534.Google Scholar
Khan, R.A. (1991) Influence of pollution on parasites of aquatic animals. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee 66(Suppl 1), 4951.Google Scholar
Kovačić, I. and Pustijanac, E. (2017) Parasites and endobiotic fungi in digestive gland cryosections of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis in the Northern Adriatic, Croatia. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 46, 414420.Google Scholar
Kovačić, I., Pavičić-Hamer, D., Pfannkuchen, M. and Usich, M. (2016) Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck, 1819) as host of Mytilicola orientalis (Mori, 1935) in the northern Adriatic Sea: presence and effect. Aquaculture International 25, 211221.Google Scholar
Kristan, U., Kanduč, T., Osterc, A., Šlejkovec, Z., Ramšak, A. and Stibilj, V. (2014) Assessment of pollution level using Mytilus galloprovincialis as a bioindicator species: the case of the Gulf of Trieste. Marine Pollution Bulletin 89, 455463.Google Scholar
Le Roux, F., Lorenzo, G., Peyret, P., Audemard, C., Figueras, A., Vivarès, C., Gouy, M. and Berthe, F. (2001) Molecular evidence for the existence of two species of Marteilia in Europe. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 48, 449454.Google Scholar
Lynch, S.A., Morgan, E., Carlsson, J., Mackenzie, C., Wooton, E.C., Rowley, A.F., Malham, S. and Culloty, S.C. (2014) The health status of mussels, Mytilus spp., in Ireland and Wales with the molecular identification of a previously undescribed haplosporidian. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 118, 5965.Google Scholar
Matozzo, V., Pagano, M., Spinelli, A., Caicci, F. and Faggio, C. (2016) Pinna nobilis: a big bivalve with big haemocytes? Fish and Shellfish Immunology 55, 529534.Google Scholar
Mladineo, I. (2008) Risk assessment of parasitic/symbiotic organisms of the commercially important mytilid Modiolus barbatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Aquaculture Research 39, 17051719.Google Scholar
Mladineo, I., Petrić, M., Hrabar, J., Bočina, I. and Peharda, M. (2012) Reaction of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia) to Eugymnanthea inquilina (Cnidaria) and Urastoma cyprinae (Turbellaria) concurrent infestation. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 110, 118125.Google Scholar
Morley, N.J. (2010) Interactive effects of infectious diseases and pollution in aquatic molluscs. Aquatic Toxicology 96, 2736.Google Scholar
Özer, A. and Güneydağ, S. (2015) Seasonality and host–parasite interrelationship of Mytilus galloprovincialis parasites in Turkish Black Sea coasts. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 95, 15911599.Google Scholar
Pagano, M., Capillo, G., Sanfilippo, M., Palato, S., Trischitta, F., Manganaro, A. and Faggio, C. (2016) Evaluation of functionality and biological responses of Mytilus galloprovincialis after exposure to Quaternium-15 (Methenamine 3-chloroallylochloride). Molecules 21, E144.Google Scholar
Pagano, M., Porcino, C., Briglia, M., Fiorino, E., Vazzana, M., Silvestro, S. and Faggio, C. (2017) The influence of exposure of cadmium chloride and zinc chloride on haemolymph and digestive gland cells from Mytilus galloprovincialis. International Journal of Environmental Research 11, 207216.Google Scholar
Pavičić-Hamer, D., Kovačić, I., Koščica, L. and Hamer, B. (2016) Physiological indices of maricultured mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck, 1819 in Istria, Croatia: seasonal and transplantation effect. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 47, 768778.Google Scholar
Queiroga, F.R., Vianna, R.T., Vieira, C.B., Farias, N.D. and Da Silva, P.M. (2015) Parasites infecting the cultured oyster Crassostrea gasar (Adanson, 1757) in Northeast Brazil. Parasitology 142, 756766.Google Scholar
Ramšak, A., Ščančar, J. and Horvat, M. (2012) Evaluation of metallothioneins in blue mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) as a biomarker of mercury and cadmium exposure in the Slovenian waters (Gulf of Trieste): a long-term field study. Acta Adriatica 53, 7186.Google Scholar
Rayyan, A., Damianidis, P., Antoniadou, C. and Chintiroglou, C.C. (2006) Protozoan parasites in cultured mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis in the Thermaikos Gulf (north Aegean Sea, Greece). Diseases of Aquatic Organism 70, 251254.Google Scholar
Roginsky, V. and Lissi, E.A. (2005) Review of methods to determine chain-breaking antioxidant activity in food. Food Chemistry 92, 235254.Google Scholar
Saffo, M. (1992) Coming to terms with a field: words and concepts in symbiosis. Symbiosis 14, 1731.Google Scholar
Sallenave-Namont, C., Pouchus, Y.F., Robiou du Pont, T., Lassus, P. and Verbist, J.F. (2000) Toxigenic saprophytic fungi in marine shellfish farming areas. Mycopathologia 149, 2125.Google Scholar
Santos, A., Hauser-Davis, R.A., Santos, M.J.S. and De Simone, S.G. (2017) Potentially toxic filamentous fungi associated to the economically important Nodipecten nodosus (Linnaeus, 1758) scallop farmed in southeastern Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Marine Pollution Bulletin 115, 7579.Google Scholar
Savorelli, F., Manfra, L., Croppo, M., Tornambè, A., Palazzi, D., Canepa, S., Trentini, P.L., Cicero, A.M. and Faggio, C. (2017) Fitness evaluation of Ruditapes philippinarum exposed to Ni. Biological Trace Element Research 177, 384393.Google Scholar
Sehonova, P., Svobodova, Z., Dolezelova, P., Vosmerova, P. and Faggio, C. (2018) Effects of waterborne antidepressants on non-target animals living in the aquatic environment: a review. Science of the Total Environment 631–632, 789794.Google Scholar
Svobodová, Z., Richard, L., Jana, M. and Blanka, V. (1993) Water quality and fish health. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Torre, A., Trischitta, F., Corsaro, C., Mallamace, D. and Faggio, C. (2013a) Digestive cells from Mytilus galloprovincialis show a partial regulatory volume decrease following acute hypotonic stress through mechanisms involving inorganic ions. Cell Biochemistry and Function 31, 489495.Google Scholar
Torre, A., Trischitta, F. and Faggio, C. (2013b) Effect of CdCl2 on regulatory volume decrease (RVD) in Mytilus galloprovincialis digestive cells. Toxicology in Vitro, 27, 12601266.Google Scholar
Tsangaris, C., Moschino, V., Strogyloudi, E., Coatu, V., Ramšak, A., Abu, A., Rana Carvalho, S.F. S., Kosyan, A., Lazarou, Y., Hatzianestis, I., Oros, A. and Tiganus, D. (2016) Biochemical biomarker responses to pollution in selected sentinel organisms across the Eastern Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Environment Science and Pollution Research International 23, 17891804.Google Scholar
Tuntiwaranuruk, C., Chalermwat, K., Pongsakchat, V., Meepool, A., Upatham, E.S. and Kruatrachue, M. (2008) Infection of Nematopsis oocysts in different size classes of the farmed mussel Perna viridis in Thailand. Aquaculture 281, 1216.Google Scholar
Vázquez, N. and Cremonte, F. (2017) Review of parasites and pathologies of the main bivalve species of commercial interest of Argentina and Uruguay, Southwestern Atlantic Coast. Archives of Parasitology 1, 112123.Google Scholar
Zannella, C., Mosca, F., Mariani, F., Franci, G., Folliero, V., Galdiero, M., Tiscar, P.G. and Galdiero, M. (2017) Microbial diseases of bivalve mollusks: infections, immunology and antimicrobial defense. Marine Drugs 15, 182218. doi: 10.3390/md15060182.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Mu, J., Feng, Y., Kang, Y., Zhang, J., Gu, P.J., Wang, Y., Ma, L.F. and Zhu, Y.H. (2009) Broad-spectrum antimicrobial epiphytic and endophytic fungi from marine organisms: isolation, bioassay and taxonomy. Marine Drugs 7, 97112.Google Scholar
Zrnčić, S., Le Roux, F., Oraić, D., Sostarić, B. and Berthe, F.C. (2001) First record of Marteilia sp. in mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis in Croatia. Diseases of Aquatic Organism 44, 143148.Google Scholar
Zvereva, L.V., Zvyagintsev, A.Y. and Ivin, V.V. (2012) Mycological study of ballast waters and sediments of commercial ships in Vladivostok port. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 3, 188201.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geographic location of the sampling areas and source of mussels in the northern Adriatic Sea (Slovenia and Croatia).

Figure 1

Table 1. Environmental parameters estimated for the sampling sites during February and April in 2014, measured at 2 m depth.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Light microscopy of transverse cryosections through the mussel digestive gland of Mytilus galloprovincialis containing: (a) basophilic prokaryote-like organisms (arrow) in the lumen of the digestive gland; (b) eosinophilic prokaryote-like organisms (arrow) in the lumen of the digestive gland; (c) plasmodia (arrow) of a haplosporidian-like organism in the digestive tubule epithelium; (d) host phagocyte containing three Nematopsis sp. oocysts in the connective tissue between the digestive tubules; (e) Urastoma cyprinae (arrow) and Ancistrocoma-like ciliate (arrowhead) at the edge of the digestive gland and digestive tubules; (f) Ancistrocoma-like ciliate (arrow) in the lumen of digestive tubule.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Light microscopy of the transverse cryosections through the mussel digestive gland of Mytilus galloprovincialis containing spores of (a) Psilocybe sp.; (b) Ulocladium sp.; and (c) Alternaria sp. attached to the digestive tubules.

Figure 4

Table 2. Prevalence (P) and intensity of infection (I) with the range in parentheses of prokaryotic inclusion bodies, Nematopsis sp., and Ancistrocoma-like ciliates from Mytilus galloprovincialis mussels collected in the northern Adriatic Sea.

Figure 5

Table 3. Prevalence (P) and intensity of infection (I) with the range in parentheses of the fungi Psilocybe sp. and Ulocladium sp. from Mytilus galloprovincialis mussels collected in the northern Adriatic Sea.

Figure 6

Table 4. Effect of sampling time and site on the prevalence and level of infection of parasites and fungi in mussels from the northern Adriatic Sea.