Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T10:06:40.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new procedure for making observations of embryo morphology in dust-like seeds with rigid coats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

Clara de Vega*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 1095, 41080-Sevilla, Spain
Renata Carmo de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Institute de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Caixa Postal 593, Uberlândia, MG, 38400-902, Brazil
*
*Correspondence: Email: cvega@us.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Observing the embryo in dust-like seeds with a rigid coat presents a particular challenge, because it is not possible to use conventional techniques applied to normal-sized seeds. A new combination of softening and clearing techniques, which is remarkably effective for direct observations of embryos in minute seeds, is reported here. Moreover, no special seed treatment is required prior to application of this combination of techniques, and good results are obtained from living and preserved material. Dust-like seeds of Cytinus hypocistis and Cytinus ruber with a rigid coat were treated successively with Franklin's and with Jeffrey's softening fluids, and then with Herr's clearing fluid. The combined action of the two softening fluids caused sufficient seed coat rupture to allow Herr's fluid to clear seed tissues, permitting effective observation of the embryo. This technique should be applicable to a wide range of species with dust-like seeds, and its possibilities for biological studies are numerous.

Type
In Brief
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Introduction

The seed biology of dust-like seeds, such as those found in Orchidaceae and in some holoparasitic angiosperms, such as Cytinaceae, Apodanthaceae, Mistratemonaceae, Hydnoraceae and Rafflesiaceae, is not well known, because their minute size makes them difficult to study. All these families have fruits that contain thousands of seeds with undifferentiated embryos comprised of only a few cells (Kuijt, Reference Kuijt1969; Rasmussen, Reference Rasmussen1995).

Moreover, embryo-less seeds have been found in different families with dust-like seeds (Kebreab and Murdoch, Reference Kebreab and Murdoch1999; Matusova et al., Reference Matusova, Van Mourik and Bouwmeester2004). Selfing and different types of crosses can affect the proportion of seeds with an embryo (Wallace, Reference Wallace2003; Jersáková and Johnson, Reference Jersáková and Johnson2006; Noland et al., Reference Noland, Parker and Morneault2006), such that self-pollinated (inbred) plants produce fruits with empty seeds (Ferdy et al., Reference Ferdy, Loriot, Sandmeier, Lefranc and Raquin2001; Smithson, Reference Smithson2006). The fact that seeds with and without an embryo are frequently similar in size, makes it difficult to distinguish between them. Filled and empty seeds of taxa with normal-sized seeds have been separated by dissection (e.g. Johnson, Reference Johnson2000; Lennartsson et al., Reference Lennartsson, Oostermeijer, Van Dijk and den Nijs2000), flotation (e.g. Rajora et al., Reference Rajora, Mosseler and Major2002; Gleiser et al., Reference Gleiser, Picher, Veintimilla, Martínez and Verdú2004), X-ray photographs (Noland et al., Reference Noland, Parker and Morneault2006; Parker et al., Reference Parker, Noland and Morneault2006), and near infrared spectroscopy (Tigabu and Odén, Reference Tigabu and Odén2003). In other cases, germination tests provide valuable information about seed viability. However, germination studies with dust-like seeds are difficult due to their special requirements. For example, mycorrhizal fungi may be required for successful orchid seed germination and establishment of seedlings (e.g. Rasmussen, Reference Rasmussen1995), while parasitic plants have special physical and chemical requirements for germination related to host exudates (e.g. Boone et al., Reference Boone, Fate, Chang, Lynn, Press and Graves1995 and references therein). Except for Orobanchaceae and Balanophoraceae, little is known about seed germination in holoparasitic plants with dust-like seeds. Indeed, for the Cytinaceae, Rafflesiaceae, Apodanthaceae, Hydnoraceae and Mistratemonaceae, there is an almost total lack of information about germination requirements or other aspects of their seed biology.

A technique is needed that allows easy verification of the presence of an embryo in seeds for which conventional techniques cannot be used, due to their minute size and rigid coat. In this paper, we outline a combination of techniques that have proved to be particularly effective for direct observations of the embryo in dust-like seeds. No special treatment of the seeds is required prior to the application of this combination of techniques, and good results can be obtained from living, preserved or herbarium material.

Materials and methods

Fruits were collected from the holoparasitic species Cytinus hypocistis and C. ruber (Cytinaceae). These species have dust-like seeds with rigid coats that are approximately 190 × 140 μm in C. hypocistis and 210 × 115 μm in C. ruber (Bouman and Meijer, Reference Bouman and Meijer1994). Seeds were removed from the fruits and preserved using two storage methods: 70% ethanol or paper bags at room temperature. These seeds were subjected to four techniques of combined softening and clearing. For each technique, aliquots of approximately 300 seeds were used, because some of them could be lost due to their small size.

To soften the seeds, we used (either singly or successively) two fluids: (1) Franklin's fluid (Franklin, Reference Franklin1945; modified by Kraus and Arduin, Reference Kraus and Arduin1997), a mixture (1:1) of 30% of hydrogen peroxide and glacial acetic acid; and (2) Jeffrey's fluid (Johansen, Reference Johansen1940), which was composed of a mixture (1:1) of nitric acid and 10% chromic acid. Both fluids have been used traditionally for softening vascular tissues (e.g. Schneider and Carlquist, Reference Schneider and Carlquist1997; Chaffey et al., Reference Chaffey, Cholewa, Regan and Sundberg2002) and for fibre extraction or removal of other wood components (e.g. Ericsson and Fries, Reference Ericsson and Fries2004, Kostiainen et al., Reference Kostiainen, Jalkanen, Kaakinen, Saranpaa and Vapaavuori2006). To our knowledge, these two softening fluids have not been used previously for seeds. Most researchers have heated or boiled plant material in Franklin's fluid, but we maintained Cytinus seeds in this reagent at room temperature, because heating was too aggressive for this material.

We used Herr's fluid (Herr, Reference Herr1971), which is comprised of lactic acid (85%), chloral hydrate, phenol, clove oil and xylene (2:2:2:2:1, by weight) as the clearing technique. Traditionally, Herr's clearing technique has been useful for the study of ovule development, megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis (using phase-contrast microscopy) (e.g. Herr, Reference Herr1971; González and Rudall, Reference González and Rudall2003; Heo et al., Reference Heo, Kimoto, Riveros and Tobe2004), and it has been used only occasionally with seeds (e.g. Czakó et al., Reference Czakó, Jang, Herr and Marton1992; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Dong, Zhang, Zhang, Wu, Deng and Xue2004).

Treatment 1. Clearing (Herr's fluid)

The effect of the clearing fluid without softening pre-treatment was tested by adding 1.5 ml of Herr's clearing fluid to the seeds. Seeds remained in Herr's fluid for 15 d at room temperature.

Treatment 2. Softening and clearing (Franklin's+ Herr's fluids)

Seeds were soaked with 2 ml of modified Franklin's fluid and left in this solution at room temperature for about 36–48 h. The softening solution was carefully removed with a Pasteur pipette, and the seeds were washed in four changes of distilled water. It is important to remove all of the water before placing the seeds in the oily Herr's clearing fluid, so after the last washing the seeds were dried at 35°C for 2–4 h. Herr's clearing fluid (1.5 ml) was added, and seeds were maintained in this solution for 48–72 h at room temperature.

Treatment 3. Softening and clearing (Jeffrey's+ Herr's fluids)

Seeds were soaked in 2 ml of Jeffrey's fluid, placed in a heating chamber for 1 h at 40°C and then left at room temperature for 24 h. The softening solution was removed, and seeds were washed as described above. Herr's clearing fluid (1.5 ml) was added, and the seeds remained in this solution for 48–72 h at room temperature.

Treatment 4. Softening and clearing (Franklin's+ Jeffrey's+ Herr's fluids)

Seeds were soaked with 2 ml of the modified Franklin's fluid and maintained in this solution at room temperature for 36–48 h. The softening solution was removed, and seeds were washed. Once the seeds were dried, 2 ml of Jeffrey's fluid was added, and seeds were incubated at 40°C for 1 h, and then at room temperature for 24 h. Jeffrey's solution was removed, and seeds were dried at 35°C for 2–4 h. Finally, 1.5 ml of Herr's fluid was added, and the samples were left in the solution for 48–72 h at room temperature.

For microscopic examinations, seeds subjected to the four aforementioned treatments were transferred to Raj-type chambered slides with a small amount of Herr's clearing fluid (Herr, Reference Herr1971).

Anatomical technique

Finally, we wanted to know if the embryo features visible by means of these combinations of fluids were similar to those observed using anatomical techniques. Hence, a group of seeds was dehydrated in an ethanol series, embedded in Historesin (glycol methacrylate, Leica, Heidelberg) and serially sectioned at 10–15 μm using a rotary microtome. Sections were stained with 0.12% toluidine blue and 0.05% basic fuschin and mounted with Eukitt (Kindler, Freiburg, Germany). All images were taken using a Leica DC300 camera attached to a Zeiss Axiophot light microscope.

Observations and discussion

Similar results were obtained for both species of Cytinus subjected to each of the four treatments. Likewise, there were no differences between seeds from different storage methods.

Cytinus seeds subjected only to Herr's clearing fluid (Treatment 1) were opaque under light microscopy, and therefore this technique does not allow embryo visualization (Fig. 1a). In seeds given this treatment, only the exotegmic cells with simple pits were observed (Fig. 1a). It is likely that it was not possible to observe the embryos because the marked thickness of the seed coat (Guzowska, Reference Guzowska1964; Bouman and Meijer, Reference Bouman and Meijer1994) impeded entry of the clearing fluid into the seed. Good fixations of fully developed embryos of Cytinus for ultrastructural observations have been impossible due to the same problem (Ponzi and Pizzolongo, Reference Ponzi and Pizzolongo1982). Likewise, neither Treatment 2 nor Treatment 3 allowed embryo visualization. Franklin's and Jeffrey's fluids used independently were not capable of breaking the Cytinus seed coat to allow the successful penetration of Herr's clearing fluid.

Figure 1 Mature seeds of Cytinus hypocistis. (a) Treatment 1, 15 d in Herr's clearing fluid. Seeds appear opaque under light microscopy. Arrows indicate exotegmic cells with simple pits. (b) Treatment 4, softening and clearing successively with Franklin's, Jeffrey's and Herr's fluids. The seed coat has ruptured and the nucellar tissue has swelled, allowing visualization of the undifferentiated embryo surrounded by the cellular endosperm. (c) Seed from Treatment 4: detail of the minute embryo composed of only a few cells surrounded by the cellular endosperm. (d) A longitudinal thin section of a seed showing the thick seed coat and undifferentiated embryo embedded in endosperm. end, Endosperm; em, embryo; n, nucellus; sc, seed coat.

Only the combination of techniques described in Treatment 4 (Franklin's+ Jeffrey's+ Herr's fluids) permitted the observation of the presence and morphology of Cytinus embryos (Fig. 1b, c). The first two steps of this technique, successively treating the seeds with Franklin's and Jeffrey's fluids, produced a rupture of the seed coat that was essential for the penetration of Herr's clearing fluid. Consequently, seeds became transparent, and features of the embryo and endosperm could be observed (Fig. 1b, c). The embryos of Cytinus hypocistis and C. ruber were similar; they are very small, composed of about ten cells, and surrounded by an endosperm of a few much larger cells (Fig. 1b, c), as has been described previously (Guzowska, Reference Guzowska1964; Ponzi and Pizzolongo, Reference Ponzi and Pizzolongo1982; Bouman and Meijer, Reference Bouman and Meijer1994). Similar features were observed in the anatomical sections (Fig. 1d), but the anatomical technique was more time consuming, and moreover, with Cytinus seeds, it was not always successful, since resin penetration was frequently impeded by the thick seed coat. Consequently, part or all of the contents of the seed were frequently detached by the microtome knife.

A sac-like structure surrounding the embryo was also observed (Fig. 1b), probably derived from the nucellus, which had swelled following hydration, thus allowing a better visualization of the embryo. This sac-like structure was rigidly perceptible in seed anatomical sections (Fig. 1d), since the remains of the nucellus are compressed in the mature seed (Guzowska, Reference Guzowska1964; Bouman and Meijer, Reference Bouman and Meijer1994). Thus, the combination of Franklin's, Jeffrey's and Herr's fluids yielded preparations that, in some cases, rival the details observed in conventional resin sections. Additionally, our combination of Franklin's and Jeffrey's fluids is applicable as a pretreatment to small seeds before being embedded in resin, facilitating the penetration of plastic resin. Recently this procedure has been used successfully with seeds of Miconia, Tococa, Leandra and Clidemia (Daniela G. Simão, personal communication).

The application of the technique described here can provide useful information by allowing rapid visualization of the embryo stage. Seeds from other holoparasitic angiosperms, such as Rafflesiaceae, Mistratemonaceae, Hydnoraceae and Apodanthaceae, also have a mechanical layer of cells with strongly thickened walls (Bouman and Meijer, Reference Bouman and Meijer1994), and application of the technique described here could be useful in visualizing embryos in seeds of these taxa. In addition, this technique could be used to facilitate studies on different aspects of the reproductive biology of species with dust seeds, to compare seeds from different pollination treatments and quickly classify them into those with viable (with a normal embryo), non-viable (with an abnormal embryo) and empty (without embryo) seeds. This would provide insight into the influence of self- versus cross-pollination on fitness of these plants. Furthermore, most holoparasitic plants have many-seeded, fleshy fruits dispersed by mammals and birds (Gómez, Reference Gómez and Burger1983; Emmons et al., Reference Emmons, Nias and Briun1991; García-Franco and Rico-Gray, Reference García-Franco and Rico-Gray1997; de Vega, unpublished observations). This technique will make it possible to observe embryo damage after consumption by animals and to discriminate between dispersers and predators.

The efficacy of the combination of softening and clearing techniques described in this paper is based on seed coat rupture that facilitates clearing of seed tissues with Herr's fluid. The technique developed here for Cytinus should be applicable to a wide range of species with dust-like and/or thick-walled seeds, and its possibilities for biological studies are numerous.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a PhD grant from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia to C. de V., by two projects from the Spanish CICYT (REN2002-04 354-C02-02 and CGL 2005-01951) and one project from the Junta de Andalucía (EXC/2005/RNM-204). The authors thank Dr P.E. Gibbs for checking the English text and D. Simão for technical support.

References

Boone, L.S., Fate, G., Chang, M. and Lynn, D.G. (1995) Seed germination. pp. 1438 in Press, M.; Graves, J. (Eds) Parasitic plants. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Bouman, F. and Meijer, W. (1994) Comparative structure of ovules and seeds in Rafflesiaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 193, 187212.Google Scholar
Chaffey, N., Cholewa, E., Regan, S. and Sundberg, B. (2002) Secondary xylem development in Arabidopsis: A model for wood formation. Physiologia Plantarum 114, 594600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czakó, M., Jang, J.C., Herr, J.M. and Marton, L. (1992) Differential manifestation of seed mortality induced by seed specific expression of the gene for diphtheria toxin A chain in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Molecular and General Genetics 235, 3340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, L.H., Nias, J. and Briun, A. (1991) The fruit and consumers of Rafflesia keithii (Rafflesiaceae). Biotropica 23, 191199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, T. and Fries, A. (2004) Genetic analysis of fibre size in a full-sib Pinus sylvestris L. progeny test. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19, 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferdy, J.B., Loriot, S., Sandmeier, M., Lefranc, M. and Raquin, C. (2001) Inbreeding depression in a rare deceptive orchid. Canadian Journal of Botany 79, 11811188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, G.L. (1945) Preparation of thin sections of synthetic resins and wood-resin composites, and a new macerating method for wood. Nature 155, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Franco, J.G. and Rico-Gray, V. (1997) Dispersal, viability, germination and seed bank of Bdallophyton bambusarum (Rafflesiaceae) in the coast of Veracruz, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical 45, 8794.Google Scholar
Gleiser, G., Picher, M.C., Veintimilla, P., Martínez, J. and Verdú, M. (2004) Seed dormancy in relation to seed storage behaviour in Acer. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 145, 203208.Google Scholar
Gómez, L.D. (1983) Rafflesiaceae. pp. 89–93 in Burger, W. (Ed.) Flora Costaricensis. Fieldiana Botanica II. Chicago, Illinois, Field Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
González, F. and Rudall, P.J. (2003) Structure and development of the ovule and seed in Aristolochiaceae, with particular reference to Saruma. Plant Systematics and Evolution 241, 223244.Google Scholar
Guzowska, I. (1964) Reinvestigation of embryo sac development, fertilization and early embryogeny in Cytinus hypocistis L. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 33, 157–166.Google Scholar
Heo, K., Kimoto, Y., Riveros, M. and Tobe, H. (2004) Embryology of Gomortegaceae (Laurales): Characteristics and character evolution. Journal of Plant Research 117, 221228.Google Scholar
Herr, J.M. (1971) A new clearing-squash technique for the study of ovule development in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 58, 785790.Google Scholar
Jersáková, J. and Johnson, S.D. (2006) Lack of floral nectar reduces self-pollination in a fly-pollinated orchid. Oecologia 147, 60–68.Google Scholar
Johansen, D.A. (1940) Plant microtechnique. New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.D. (2000) Batesian mimicry in the non-rewarding orchid Disa pulchra, and its consequences for pollinator behaviour. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71, 119132.Google Scholar
Kebreab, E. and Murdoch, A.J. (1999) Effect of temperature and humidity on the longevity of Orobanche seeds. Weed Research 39, 199211.Google Scholar
Kostiainen, K., Jalkanen, H., Kaakinen, S., Saranpaa, P. and Vapaavuori, E. (2006) Wood properties of two silver birch clones exposed to elevated CO2 and O3. Global Change Biology 12, 12301240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, J.E. and Arduin, M. (1997) Manual básico de métodos em morfologia vegetal. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, EDUR.Google Scholar
Kuijt, J. (1969) The biology of parasitic flowering plants. Berkeley, California, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lennartsson, T., Oostermeijer, J.G.B., Van Dijk, J. and den Nijs, H.C.M. (2000) Ecological significance and heritability of floral reproductive traits in Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). Basic and Applied Ecology 1, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matusova, R., Van Mourik, T. and Bouwmeester, H.J. (2004) Changes in the sensitivity of parasitic weed seeds to germination stimulants. Seed Science Research 14, 335344.Google Scholar
Noland, T.L., Parker, W.C. and Morneault, A.E. (2006) Natural variation in seed characteristics of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). New Forests 32, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, W.C., Noland, T.L. and Morneault, A.E. (2006) The effects of seed mass on germination, seedling emergence, and early seedling growth of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). New Forests 32, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponzi, R. and Pizzolongo, P. (1982) Cytinus hypocistis L. embryogenesis: Some biological and ultrastuctural aspects of fertilization and embryo development. Giornale Botanico Italiano 116, 149166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajora, O.P., Mosseler, A. and Major, J.E. (2002) Mating system and reproductive fitness traits of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) in large, central versus small, isolated, marginal populations. Canadian Journal of Botany 80, 11731184.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H.N. (1995) Terrestrial orchids: From seed to mycotrophic plant. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E.L. and Carlquist, S. (1997) SEM studies on vessels in ferns. III. Phlebodium and Polystichum. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, A. (2006) Pollinator limitation and inbreeding depression in orchid species with and without nectar rewards. New Phytologist 169, 419430.Google Scholar
Tigabu, M. and Odén, P.C. (2003) Discrimination of viable and empty seeds of Pinus patula Schiede & Deppe with near-infrared spectroscopy. New Forests 25, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L.E. (2003) The cost of inbreeding in Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 90, 235242.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Dong, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y.S., Wu, W.H., Deng, X.W. and Xue, Y.B. (2004) Genome-wide analyses of S-Locus F-box-like genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Molecular Biology 56, 929945.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Mature seeds of Cytinus hypocistis. (a) Treatment 1, 15 d in Herr's clearing fluid. Seeds appear opaque under light microscopy. Arrows indicate exotegmic cells with simple pits. (b) Treatment 4, softening and clearing successively with Franklin's, Jeffrey's and Herr's fluids. The seed coat has ruptured and the nucellar tissue has swelled, allowing visualization of the undifferentiated embryo surrounded by the cellular endosperm. (c) Seed from Treatment 4: detail of the minute embryo composed of only a few cells surrounded by the cellular endosperm. (d) A longitudinal thin section of a seed showing the thick seed coat and undifferentiated embryo embedded in endosperm. end, Endosperm; em, embryo; n, nucellus; sc, seed coat.