Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:59:54.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Live birth following a single oocyte fertilized with ICSI and embryo transfer on day 2: a case report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2020

Romualdo Sciorio*
Affiliation:
Edinburgh Assisted Conception Programme, EFREC, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK Reproductive Medicine & IVF Unit, Royale Hayat Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
Elisavet Angelaki
Affiliation:
Reproductive Medicine & IVF Unit, Royale Hayat Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
Naser Al-Azemi
Affiliation:
Reproductive Medicine & IVF Unit, Royale Hayat Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
*
Author for correspondence: Romualdo Sciorio. Edinburgh Assisted Conception Programme, EFREC, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4SA, UK. E-mail: sciorioromualdo@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this report, we present a case of a couple who obtained a live birth with a single oocyte fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The oocyte was collected at 36 h post trigger and was found to be at metaphase II when sperm injection was performed. At 18 h post injection, the oocyte was found to be fertilized with two clear pronuclei. The embryo divided and generated a four-cell embryo on day 2, which was replaced to the uterine cavity. Pregnancy test gave a positive β-human chorionic gonadotropin result, the scan performed at 7 weeks, revealed the presence of one amniotic sac with fetal heartbeat. Healthy live birth was obtained after 39 weeks of gestation.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Over 8 million in vitro fertilization (IVF) children have been born since 1978 when the first IVF baby was announced (Steptoe and Edwards,Reference Steptoe and Edwards1978). The number of couples facing infertility has increased steadily, many of whom will ultimately need assisted reproductive technology (Thoma et al., Reference Thoma, McLain, Louis, King, Trumble, Sundaram and Buck Louis2013). Worldwide, approximately 2.5 million medically assisted reproduction (MAR) cycles are performed, resulting in over 500,000 deliveries annually. In the UK, IVF babies accounted for about 3% of all babies born in 2016 (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2018; De Geyter et al., Reference De Geyter, Calhaz-Jorge, Kupka, Wyns, Mocanu, Motrenko, Scaravelli, Smeenk, Vidakovic and Goossens2018). IVF is a sophisticated process and, during the last 40 years, has improved steadily, therefore providing better a pregnancy chance for infertile couples. However, in vitro development of the human embryo is still suboptimal and many good quality embryos fail to implant and generate a viable pregnancy (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Maxson, Hoffman, Ory, Eager, Dupre and Lu1998; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Brezina, Hsu, Garcia, Brinsden and Wallach2011; Niederberger et al., Reference Niederberger, Pellicer, Cohen, Gardner, Palermo, O’Neill, Chow, Rosenwaks, Cobo and Swain2018). The introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI; Palermo et al., Reference Palermo, Joris, Devroey and Van Steirteghem1992) has changed the treatment of male infertility, in particular for patients with a very low sperm count. Indeed, only a single spermatozoon would be needed to fertilize an oocyte and generate a successful pregnancy using the ICSI procedure. However, the number of oocytes collected is a major determinant of IVF success, with higher yields for better outcomes (Esteves et al., Reference Esteves, Carvalho, Bento and Santos2019a). Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) using exogenous gonadotropins to stimulate the ovary is applied to promote multifollicular development with the aim of harvesting multiple oocytes, which are collected surgically. Typically, a pharmacological dose of follicle stimulating (FSH) is used to induce the growth of multiple ovarian follicles. As follicles grow, luteinizing hormone (LH) exposure is provided to simulate the mid-cycle LH surge, which induces the processes of oocyte maturation and subsequent ovulation. Oocyte collection is therefore precisely timed to retrieve mature oocytes before the occurrence of ovulation. LH exposure initiates the resumption of meiosis and the maturation of the oocyte from the immature ‘metaphase I’ (MI) stage to the mature ‘metaphase II’ (MII) stage of development (Voronina and Wessel, Reference Voronina and Wessel2003). Following ovulation, the remainder of the follicle forms the corpus luteum, which produces sex steroids, particularly progesterone, to prepare the endometrium for the implantation process of the embryo (Palomba et al., Reference Palomba, Santagni and La Sala2015). Given the expected number of low oocyte in patients with reduced ovarian reserve and advanced maternal age (AMA), several strategies have been applied to raise the follicle number and oocyte collected, including the increased gonadotropin dose. The classic treatment remains the COS using the long GnRH agonist protocol, associated with hCG trigger for oocyte maturation (Esteves et al., Reference Esteves, Yarali, Ubaldi, Carvalho, Bento, Vaiarelli, Cimadomo, Özbek, Polat, Bozdag, Rienzi and Alviggi2020). Despite that, in some patients undergoing IVF, occasionally only a limited number of oocytes are retrieved after COS. In this case, it is known that the likelihood of having a fertilized oocyte and a further transferable embryo with a successful pregnancy is very low, especially in women with AMA.

Case presentation

A married couple was referred to the reproductive medicine department at Royale Hayat Hospital, Kuwait City in 2019 for treatment. They presented with a 4-year history of primary infertility due to low ovarian reserve. The husband’s age was 40 years, and semen analysis showed moderate asthenozoospermia. His wife was a 39-year-old woman with regular ovulatory cycles and FSH levels of 9.6 mIU/ml, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) 0.1 ng/ml and body mass index (BMI) 29. They underwent a full ICSI cycle at Royale Hayat Hospital. The female patient responded quite poorly at the COS. Briefly, 300 IU daily of recombinant human gonadotropin (Gonal-F, Merck, Rome, Italy) were administrated for 9 days (total gonadotrophin dose of 2700 IU). One dominant follicle was seen on the right ovary >18 mm, and another follicle was seen on the left ovary (15 mm). Oocyte maturation was triggered using a single injection of 5000 IU IVF-C (Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, Ciplamed) subcutaneously. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval was carried out 36 h after the trigger administration. Only one oocyte was retrieved during oocyte pick-up. At the egg collection day, the sperm count was 85 × 106/ml, the total motility was 13%, and the strict morphology 5%. We counselled the couple regarding the need for ICSI treatment given the low oocyte number and the couple agreed to this procedure.

Oocyte retrieval, ICSI, embryo culture and transfer

The cumulus–oocyte complex (COC) was isolated from follicular fluid and then rinsed in 1.0 ml G-MOPS™ plus medium (VitroLife, Göteborg, Sweden). Following the oocyte pick-up, the oocyte was transferred to 1.0 ml equilibrated G-IVF™ medium (VitroLife) at 37°C and 6% CO2, 5% O2 and nitrogen balance in a K-System incubator (K-System G210, CooperSurgical, Inc., USA) until the ICSI time. Sperm used for ICSI procedure was collected by masturbation and processed using a standard method as described by Bourne and colleagues (Reference Bourne, Edgar, Baker, Gardner, Weissman, Howles and Shoham2004). Approximately 38–39 h after trigger, the oocyte was treated by hyaluronidase (80 mIU/ml) for 45–60 s to remove the surrounding cumulus cells. At that time, the oocyte was found to be at the MII stage, with clear extrusion of the first polar body. A single spermatozoon with normal morphology and progressive motility was selected under an inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-S, Japan) and micro-injected with the use of electrohydraulic injectors (Narishige, Japan). The oocyte was kept still by using a holding micropipette at the 9 o’clock position, and the polar body was oriented at the 12 o’clock position. The injecting pipette then was gently advanced through the zona pellucida and oolemma until the pipette was beyond the centre of the oocyte; then, the sperm was gently deposited into the oocyte’s cytoplasm. The oocyte was examined for the presence of two pronuclei, and successful fertilization was confirmed at approximately 18 h after insemination. On day 2, the embryo was four-cell grade one, and was transferred to the uterine cavity (Figure 1). The embryo culture was completed, adopting sequential pre-equilibrated medium (VitroLife, G-series) as follows. Firstly, the fertilized oocyte was placed into a 20-μl drop of G-1™ medium covered by mineral oil. On the morning of day 2, the embryo was transferred from the G-1™ microdroplet to a μl droplet of EmbryoGlue (VitroLife) medium and kept in culture for almost 30 min, when embryo transfer was performed. We report here a compelling case in which a live birth was obtained from the only oocyte collected after COS. The embryo generated by ICSI was transferred on day 2 (Figure 1). The embryo replacement was completed under transabdominal ultrasound guidance using a soft transfer catheter (Wallace® Classic, CooperSurgical, USA). Luteal phase support with 90 mg progesterone vaginal gel twice a day (Crinone 8%, Merck) was started on the evening of egg collection day and continued until the 9th gestation week add Progyluton tablet 2 mg, Clexane 0.4 ml and a tablet of baby Aspirin 75 mg daily. At the embryo transfer the patient started to take two injections weekly of Biosterone-Depot 250 mg and continued until 9 weeks of gestation.

Figure 1. Embryo replaced on day 2 (four cells).

Pregnancy outcome

The embryo implanted and gave a positive pregnancy with fetal heart, which resulted in a live birth female baby, born by caesarean section after 39 weeks of gestation.

Discussion

MAR outcome is dependent on multiple factors, including oocyte and sperm quality, maternal age, infertility cause, lifestyle factors, as well as laboratory conditions for manipulation and embryo culture (Gardner and Schoolcraft, Reference Gardner and Schoolcraft1999; Gardner; Reference Gardner2016; Sciorio and Smith, Reference Sciorio and Smith2019). Appropriate oocyte cytoplasmic and nuclear maturation are paramount to ensure an optimal embryonic developmental competence. While nuclear maturation is usually obtained by the time of oocyte retrieval, cytoplasmic maturation cannot be assessed precisely, and it might negatively effect pregnancy outcome. However, an important aspect to mention is the importance of the number of oocytes retrieved in IVF patients, which has a direct effect on the outcome of MAR treatment, especially in patients with AMA (Esteves et al., Reference Esteves, Carvalho, Bento and Santos2019a; Vaiarelli et al., Reference Vaiarelli, Cimadomo, Ubaldi, Rienzi and Ubaldi2018). A recent paper published by Ubaldi and co-workers summarized the current and novel approaches for AMA patients undergoing IVF (Ubaldi et al., Reference Ubaldi, Cimadomo, Vaiarelli, Fabozzi, Venturella, Maggiulli, Mazzilli, Ferrero, Palagiano and Rienzi2019). This aspect has been investigated also in patients underwent to oocyte vitrification by Cobo and collaborators. The authors analyzed more than 6000 vitrified-warmed cycles, and reported an increased cumulative live birth rate from 15.8% with five oocytes to 32.0% with eight oocytes frozen. For younger patients (≤35 years old) 10 or 15 oocytes provided success rates of 42.8% and 69.8%. The highest cumulative live birth rate of 94.4% was obtained in younger patients when number of oocytes vitrified was 24 (Cobo et al., Reference Cobo, García-Velasco, Domingo, Pellicer and Remohí2018). With fresh oocytes, another study evaluated the minimum number of mature oocytes to achieve at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer. The study found that the age of the woman was the most critical predictor for the likelihood of achieving one euploid blastocyst. Based on this model a patient of 37 years old undergoing MAR treatment using ejaculated sperm needs between 9–13 mature oocytes to obtain at least one euploid blastocyst to transfer (Esteves et al., Reference Esteves, Carvalho, Martinhago, Melo, Bento, Humaidan and Alviggi2019b). Therefore, in this case report, we were somewhat amazed to see that the only oocyte collected from a 39-year-old woman, was found to be mature and injected, fertilized and developed into a good quality embryo on day 2, when the embryo was transfer to the uterine cavity, and resulted in a viable pregnancy. Generally, the probability of having a good quality embryo to transfer after the retrieval of a single COC is low, and even lower in women with AMA. However, several elements, including maternal age, infertility cause, sperm parameters, and laboratory conditions such as temperature, pH, CO2 and O2 concentration (Gardner, Reference Gardner2016; Sciorio and Smith, Reference Sciorio and Smith2019) during the embryo culture might influence both the fertilization and the embryo quality. This case’s unique characteristic highlights the importance of MAR to overcoming the most adverse situations. Health professionals providing care to patients who are infertile should be aware that it is possible to provide couples like the one described here a real hope of biological parenthood. Equally important is to share such cases within the MAR community, which is often sceptical about the likelihood of one fertilized oocyte to generate a viable embryo for transfer, and ultimately a viable pregnancy with live birth.

Conclusion

We report here a compelling case in which a 39-year-old woman after COS was able to produce two follicles. Approximately 36 h after trigger, one oocyte was collected and then fertilized by ICSI. The fertilized embryo on day 2 was found to be at the four-cell stage, it was replaced to the uterine cavity, and resulted in a live birth female baby, born by caesarean section after 39 weeks of gestation.

Author contributions

RS, EA, and NA contributed to the planning and designed the manuscript. RS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. EA and NA wrote sections of the manuscript and revised it for content. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, and read and approved the submitted version.

Financial support

None.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

Data availability

All data are included in the study.

References

Bourne, H, Edgar, DH and Baker, HWG (2004). Sperm Preparation Techniques. In: Gardner, DK, Weissman, A, Howles, CM and Shoham, Z (eds). Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques 2004: Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives 2nd edn. USA: Informa Healthcare, pp. 7991.Google Scholar
Cobo, A, García-Velasco, J, Domingo, J, Pellicer, A and Remohí, J (2018). Elective and onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes. Hum Reprod 33, 2222–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Geyter, C, Calhaz-Jorge, C, Kupka, MS, Wyns, C, Mocanu, E, Motrenko, T, Scaravelli, G, Smeenk, J, Vidakovic, S and Goossens, V (2018). European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod 33, 1586–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, SC, Carvalho, JF, Bento, FC and Santos, J (2019a). A novel predicative model to estimate the number of mature oocytes required for obtaining al least one euploid blastocyst for transfer in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the ART calculator. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 10, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, SC, Carvalho, JF, Martinhago, CD, Melo, AA, Bento, FC, Humaidan, P and Alviggi, C (2019b). POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) Group. Estimation of age-dependent decrease in blastocyst euploidy by next generation sequencing: development of a novel prediction model. Panminerva Med 61, 310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esteves, SC, Yarali, H, Ubaldi, FM, Carvalho, JF, Bento, FC, Vaiarelli, A, Cimadomo, D, Özbek, İY, Polat, M, Bozdag, G, Rienzi, L and Alviggi, C (2020). Validation of ART calculator for predicting the number of metaphase II oocytes required for obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 10, 917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK (2016). The impact of physiological oxygen during culture, and vitrification for cryopreservation, on the outcome of extended culture in human IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 32, 137–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK and Schoolcraft, WB (1999). Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 11, 307–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, Y, Maxson, WS, Hoffman, DI, Ory, SJ, Eager, S, Dupre, J and Lu, C (1998). Maximizing pregnancy rates and limiting higher-order multiple conceptions by determining the optimal number of embryos to transfer based on quality. Fertil Steril 69, 650–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2018). Fertility treatment 2014–2016. Trends and figures. Available at https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2563/hfea-fertility-trends-and-figures-2017-v2.pdf (accessed 1 March 2018).Google Scholar
Niederberger, C, Pellicer, A, Cohen, J, Gardner, DK, Palermo, GD, O’Neill, CL, Chow, S, Rosenwaks, Z, Cobo, A, Swain, JE, et al. (2018). Forty years of IVF. Fertil Steril 110, 185–324.e5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palermo, G, Joris, H, Devroey, P and Van Steirteghem, AC (1992). Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 340, 17–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palomba, S, Santagni, S and La Sala, GB (2015). Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue? J Ovarian Res 8, 7792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sciorio, R and Smith, GD (2019). Embryo culture at a reduced oxygen concentration of 5%: a mini review. Zygote 23, 17.Google Scholar
Steptoe, PC and Edwards, RG (1978). Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 2, 366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoma, ME, McLain, AC, Louis, JF, King, RB, Trumble, AC, Sundaram, R and Buck Louis, GM (2013). The prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertil Steril 99, 1324–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubaldi, FM, Cimadomo, D, Vaiarelli, A, Fabozzi, G, Venturella, R, Maggiulli, R, Mazzilli, R, Ferrero, S, Palagiano, A and Rienzi, L (2019). Advanced maternal age in IVF: still a challenge? The present and the future of its treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 10, 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaiarelli, A, Cimadomo, D, Ubaldi, N, Rienzi, L and Ubaldi, FM (2018). What is new in the management of poor ovarian response in IVF? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 30, 155–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Voronina, E and Wessel, G (2003). The regulation of oocyte maturation. Curr Top Dev Biol 58, 53110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Y, Brezina, P, Hsu, CC, Garcia, J, Brinsden, PR and Wallach, E (2011). In vitro fertilization: four decades of reflections and promises. Biochim Biophys Acta 1810, 843–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Embryo replaced on day 2 (four cells).