Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:44:12.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of somatic cells on the protein profile of hard ovine cheese produced from different breeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2011

Isabel Revilla*
Affiliation:
Food Technology Area, Universidad de Salamanca. E.P.S de Zamora. Avda. Requejo 33, 49022, Zamora, Spain
Jose M Rodríguez-Nogales
Affiliation:
Food Technology Area, University of Valladolid.E.T.S. de Ingenierías Agrarias. Avda. Madrid 57, 34004 Palencia, Spain
Ana M Vivar-Quintana
Affiliation:
Food Technology Area, Universidad de Salamanca. E.P.S de Zamora. Avda. Requejo 33, 49022, Zamora, Spain
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: irevilla@usal.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bulk tank ewe's milks with low (<500,000 ml−1), medium (1,000,000–1,500,000 ml−1) and high (>2,500,000 ml−1) somatic cell counts (SCC) from three breeds were used to manufacture hard ewes’-milk cheese. Physico-chemical analysis and capillary electrophoresis of fresh cheeses and cheeses that had been ripened for 1, 2, 3 and 6 months were carried out. The results showed that high SCC levels in milk affected the moisture content of only freshly made cheeses and the pH, fat content and fat acidity of ripened cheeses. Regarding proteolysis, the levels of all β-CNs in freshly made cheeses were significantly lower as the SCC values increased and the Castellana breed was the most affected by SCC levels because a significant decrease in all α-CNs was also observed as SCC levels rose. Analysis of the casein profile by principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that there were no clear differences according the SCC up to the third month. However in the third and sixth months cheeses with low levels of SC were closely grouped and characterised by the highest levels of intact caseins. Regarding the effect of breed, the results point to a more intense proteolytic activity in the Assaf breed, whose more matured cheeses showed the highest content of casein proteolytic fragments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2011

Ewes' milk is used almost exclusively for the production of cheese, and its cheese-making qualities depend on the milk characteristics especially on the concentration of intact casein (Fantuz et al. Reference Fantuz, Polidori, Cheli and Baldi2001). Previous studies have shown that high Somatic Cell Counts (SCC) are positively correlated with total nitrogen, non-protein nitrogen and whey proteins (Pirisi et al. Reference Pirisi, Piredda, Podda, Pintus and Rubino1996, Reference Pirisi, Piredda, Corona, Pes, Pintus and Ledda2000; Leitner et al. Reference Leitner, Chaffer, Caraso, Ezra, Kababea, Winkler, Winkler, Glickman and Saran2003; Bianchi et al. Reference Bianchi, Bolla, Budelli, Caroli, Casoli, Pauselli and Duranti2004; Vivar-Quintana et al. Reference Vivar-Quintana, Beneitez de la Mano and Revilla2006), although the results of such studies are not always in agreement. Indeed, high SCC affords lower levels of β1-, β2-, and αs1-I-casein, and α-lactalbumin (Rodríguez-Nogales et al. Reference Rodríguez-Nogales, Vivar-Quintana and Revilla2007) because milk from mastitic udders exhibits increased proteolytic activity (Albenzio et al. Reference Albenzio, Caroprese, Santillo, Marino, Taibi and Sevi2004).

Despite the significance of proteolysis on the quality of ewes' milk hard cheese, the effect of SCC on this process is less well documented. Some authors have reported significantly higher percentages of proteolysis in cheeses made from high-SCC milks, together with some sensory defects (Jaeggi et al. Reference Jaeggi, Govindasamy-Lucey, Berger, Johnson, McKusick, Thomas and Wendorff2003; Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2007), because increasing levels of SCC proteolytic enzymes will contribute to proteolysis in cheese (Marino et al. Reference Marino, Considine, Sevi, McSweeney and Kelly2005), and the hydrolysis of caseins directly affects the development of the desired texture and aroma, and the intensity of the background flavour of matured cheese (Fox & McSweeney, Reference Fox and McSweeney1996). Nevertheless, Pirisi et al. (Reference Pirisi, Piredda, Corona, Pes, Pintus and Ledda2000) have reported that milk SCCs have no effects on secondary proteolysis or on sensory characteristics. Much less is known about the effect of SCCs on the different casein fractions, and although in fresh cheese α-casein is more proteolysed than β-casein, in most mature cheeses the percentage of hydrolysis of β-casein is similar to that of α-casein (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2007).

Taking into account that few studies have investigated proteolytic patterns in ewes' cheeses by means of capillary electrophoresis and that these patterns are probably affected by SCC levels, the aim of the present work was to monitor the evolution of different casein fractions during the ripening process of hard ewes' cheese made from the milk of two Spanish local breeds (Churra and Castellana) and one foreign breed (Assaf) in order to determine ifthat the effect of SCC was independent on the breed. In Spain, the Assaf breed is becoming increasingly important but some works have reported higher incidence of mastitis compared with local breeds (González-Rodríguez et al. Reference González-Rodríguez, Gonzalo, San Primitivo and Cármenes1995; Gonzalo et al. Reference Gonzalo, Carriedo, Blanco, Beneitez, Juárez, De la Fuente and San Primitivo2005).

Materials and Methods

Milk samples were collected as previously described (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2009b) and cheeses of each milk type were manufactured in accordance with the procedure reported by Revilla et al. (Reference Revilla, Lurueña-Martínez and Vivar-Quintana2009a).

Analytical methods

Cheeses were analysed for pH (potentiometric method, CRISON Basic20), fat (Van Gulik method, ISO, 1975), moisture (IDF, 1982), ash (AOAC, 2000) and fat acidity (IDF, 1969). Total nitrogen (AOAC, 1995) was determined using the Kjeldahl method and the results were expressed as protein equivalents (TN × 6·38) on the basis of dry extract.

Capillary electrophoresis of cheese

Ewes'-milk cheeses that had been ripened for 0, 1, 2, 3 and 6 months were used to obtain isoelectric ovine casein. The caseins were extracted by the method of Ibañez et al. (Reference Ibañez, Torres, Ordoñez and Barcina1995) and analysed by capillary electrophoresis according to the method reported by Revilla et al. (Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2007). Each sample was analysed three times and the average of the relative area of each peak was calculated.

Statistical analyses

The data for each variable were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The statistical significance of a factor (sample) was calculated at the α=0·05 level, using the F-test. When significant, the LSD Fisher-test was employed to test for statistically significant differences between means. Among pattern recognition tools, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used for data treatment. All statistical analyses were carried out using the Statgraphic Plus for Windows Computer Package (1995 Manugistics, Inc.).

Results and Discussion

Cheese characteristics

Moisture showed higher values as SCC values rose in freshly elaborated cheeses (Table 1), and this is in agreement with previous reports that showed a tendency for the cheese made from the high SCC milk to possess statistically significant higher humidity (Pirisi et al. Reference Pirisi, Piredda, Corona, Pes, Pintus and Ledda2000; Jaeggi et al. Reference Jaeggi, Govindasamy-Lucey, Berger, Johnson, McKusick, Thomas and Wendorff2003).

Table 1. Mean values and (SD) for composition parameters of cheeses depending on SCC or breed

Fat content on a dry weight basis. ‡Total %N×6·38, on a dry weight basis. §Ash on a dry weight basis. ¶mg of KOH per gram of fat

a,b Different letter in the same column means statistically significant differences between SCC groups within the same month of ripening

Previous authors have reported that cheeses made from mastitic milk have higher moisture contents than those made from normal milk (Grandison & Ford, Reference Grandison and Ford1986; Mitchell et al. Reference Mitchell, Fedrick and Rogers1986; Barbano et al. Reference Barbano, Rasmussen and Lynch1991), apparently due to an alteration in the milk protein composition and mineral balance (Munro et al. Reference Munro, Grieve and Kitchen1984), although some studies have reported that somatic cells themselves may contribute to the increase in the cheese moisture content (Marino et al. Reference Marino, Considine, Sevi, McSweeney and Kelly2005). However, in ripened cheeses there were no statistically significant differences in moisture content due to the SCC.

This was the only difference detected in fresh cheese due to the SCC, unlike that which was observed for the composition of the starting milk, in which significantly higher pH values and significantly lower fat contents where observed when SSC increased (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2009b). This absence of significance may be due to the normalization of pH at 6·5 before the addition of the rennet, as indicated by Pirisi et al. (Reference Pirisi, Piredda, Corona, Pes, Pintus and Ledda2000).

Regarding pH, statistically significant differences were observed as SCC increased from low to medium and high SCC at the last stages of ripening considered. This result is due to the higher proteolytic activity, which produces a release of amino acids and leads to higher pH values (Sousa et al. Reference Sousa, Ardo and McSweeney2001).

The fat content of the cheeses declined as SCC increased and the difference was statistically significant in the 6-month-old cheeses. As SCC increased, higher values of fat acidity were also observed that were statistically significant for high-SCC milk cheese up to the second month of ripening. This is attributable to an increase in lipolytic activity in the highest-SCC milks due to the lipase activity of somatic cells (Delandes, Reference Delandes1998), which produces higher concentrations of free fatty acids (FFAs) (Salih & Anderson, Reference Salih and Anderson1979; Bachman et al. Reference Bachman, Hayen, Morse and Wilcox1988).

The ash and protein contents did not show any significant variations due to the change in SC levels at any of the ripening states, in agreement with previous results (Pirisi et al. Reference Pirisi, Piredda, Corona, Pes, Pintus and Ledda2000; Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2007, Reference Revilla, Lurueña-Martínez and Vivar-Quintana2009a).

Regarding the effect of breed, cheeses of the three breeds evolved in a similar fashion and no significant differences were observed in any of the months of ripening for any of the parameters studied. These results agree with those obtained for 12-month old cheeses showing a lack of significant differences in physico-chemical parameters due to breed and statistically significant differences for pH, fat and fat acidity due to SCC levels. Indeed, the tendency for high-SCC cheeses to have higher moisture contents was confirmed by the results for 12-month old cheeses (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Lurueña-Martínez and Vivar-Quintana2009a).

Protein profile of freshly produced cheeses

The casein composition of recently manufactured cheeses expressed as peak electropherogram area is shown in Table 2. The caseins were identified according to the electropherogram order of elution, as previously reported by Revilla et al. (Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2007).

Table 2. Mean values and (sd) for casein composition of freshly produced cheeses expressed as electropherogram area

a,b Different letter in the same row means statistically significant differences at p< 0·05 due to the SCC

x,y Different letter in the same row means statistically significant differences at p< 0·05 due to the breed

Regarding αs1-CNs, the αs1-I-CN variant showed significantly lower levels with the increase in SCCs that were statistically significant for local breeds. The other two αs1-caseins (αs1-II-CN and αs1-III-CN) and αs2-CN levels were not affected by the SCC, although the Castellana breed showed statistically lower values of these caseins as SCC levels rose. The results also showed that the cheeses made from low SCC milk had the highest levels of β-CN, β1-CN and β2-CN.

The results concerning the influence of SCCs on αs-CN are in agreement with what has been reported for the starting milk (Rodríguez-Nogales et al. Reference Rodríguez-Nogales, Vivar-Quintana and Revilla2007). However, for the β-CN in fresh cheese, a stronger influence of SSCs was observed, such that the levels of β-CN and β1-CN were significantly lower in the medium- and high-SSC cheeses, whereas in the milk there was either no effect (β-CN) or it was significant only for high SCC-milk (β1-CN).

Higher proteolysis of caseins, especially of β-CN, in agreement with the results of Marino et al. (Reference Marino, Considine, Sevi, McSweeney and Kelly2005), as SCC rise can be attributed to the higher moistures in the medium and high SCC cheeses (Jaeggi et al. Reference Jaeggi, Govindasamy-Lucey, Berger, Johnson, McKusick, Thomas and Wendorff2003). High moisture levels are known to accelerate proteolysis, the hydrolysis of β-CN being more favoured than α-CN hydrolysis (Creamer, Reference Creamer1970). Moreover, the higher β-CN proteolysis may also be due to a higher plasmin activity reported in high SCC milk (Zachos et al. Reference Zachos, Politis, Gorewit and Barbano1992; Gilmore et al. Reference Gilmore, White, Zavizion and Politis1995). This higher proteolysis in high-SCC cheeses was specially important in the case of the Assaf breed because high-SCC milk of the Assaf breed had the highest contents of all the individual caseins studied when compared with low and medium-SCC milks (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2009b), however the corresponding high-SCC cheese had lower values than low and medium-SCC cheeses. In contrast, for the autochthonous breeds the effect of SSCs on fresh cheese coincides with those found in the starting milk (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2009b).

Regarding the effect of breed, no significant effect of this factor on the cheese casein composition was observed, differing from that observed for the milk (Rodríguez-Nogales, Reference Rodríguez-Nogales, Vivar-Quintana and Revilla2007; Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2009b).

With respect to the fragments due to casein hydrolysis, the I-αs1-CN fragment increased with the SCC, the differences being statistically significant for the local breeds, although in the case of the Assaf breed the result was the opposite. Study of the breed factor revealed that the Churra breed showed the highest levels of this fragment while the Castellana breed had lower values; this could be related to the better textural properties of Castellana breed curds (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2009b).

On the other hand, despite the higher degree of β-CN hydrolysis shown for the cheeses with high SCCs a significant decrease in the levels of the γ-CN fragment, which is the main product of plasmin β-CN hydrolysis, with the SCCs was observed as previously reported by Revilla et al. (Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2007). The β-CNs can be hydrolyzed to β-I peptides which may undergo further hydrolysis producing β-II and β-III peptides and other minor breakdown products (Mulhivill & Fox, Reference Mulhivill and Fox1978; Trujillo et al. Reference Trujillo, Guamis, Laencina and López2000). Finally, no effect of breed factor was observed for the γ-CN fragment.

In general, these results agree with those reported in previous research indicating that when somatic cell counts increase the proteolytic activity increases (DeRham & Andrews, Reference DeRham and Andrews1982; Verdi et al. Reference Verdi, Barbano, DellaValle and Senyk1987), reflecting lower levels of intact caseins and a poorer textural quality (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2009b).

Study of the effect of SSC on proteolysis

The casein fractions (αs2-CN, αs1-I-CN, αs1-II-CN, αs1-III-CN, β-CN, β2-CN, β1-CN) and their fragments (I-αs1-CN and γ-CN) of all the ewe's cheeses were evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA). The results of the statistical evaluation revealed the existence of four significant principal components (eigenvalues greater than unity) explaining 82·1% of the variance contained in the original data. PC1 explained 35·6% of the variance; strongly and positively contributing variables were αs1-I-CN, αs1-II-CN, and β2-CN (Fig. 1A). PC1 also had a high but negative contribution from the casein fragments I-αs1-CN and γ-CN. PC2 explained 20·7% of the variance and had a high and positive contribution from αs1-III-CN and a negative contribution from β1-CN.

Fig. 1. Loading plot (A) and score plot (B) of first two principal components for classification of samples of cheeses according their ripening time (0–6 months). Codes: A2=αs2-CN; A11=αs1-I-CN; A12=αs1-II-CN; A13=αs1-III-CN; B=β-CN; B2=β2-CN; B1=β1-CN; IA=I-αs1-CN; G=γ-CN.

An analysis of the samples as a function of their ripening time revealed a separation along the PC1 axis (Fig. 1B). The freshly manufactured cheeses were characterized by the highest values of PC1, thus pointing to the highest contents of intact casein (mainly, αs1-I-CN, αs1-II-CN, and β2-CN), while the samples of hard cheeses (3-, and 6-month-old cheeses) were located at negative values of PC1 owing to their higher levels of casein fragments (I-αs1-CN and γ-CN). PC1 was therefore critical in order to classify the samples according to their state of maturity. The values of the loadings showed that the protein fractions αs1-I-CN and αs1-II-CN underwent the strongest degree of hydrolysis. The evolution of the three β-CNs (to a lesser degree for the β2-CN) shows that this group of proteins was subject to a lower degree of hydrolysis than the alpha caseins, in agreement with previous findings for ewes' cheeses, since their maximum hydrolysis was 40% while in the case of the alpha caseins this value reached 80%. This percentage is similar to or slightly higher than that observed for other ewes' cheeses with the same ripening time (Freitas et al. 1997; Albillos et al. Reference Albillos, Busto, Pérez-Mateos and Ortega2006; Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Rodríguez-Nogales and Vivar-Quintana2007). In the case of the β-CN and β1-CN, these did not undergo an important degree of proteolysis during the ripening time, while the evolution of the β2-CN variant pointed to a gradual and continuous decrease in intact protein levels throughout maturation.

The samples of cheeses of different SCC levels or from different breeds overlapped in the space defined by the first two PCs. Thus, new PCA was performed for each ripening time because no clear differences were found among the protein profiles of the samples according their SCC or breed.

The results of PCA for 1-month-old cheeses gave three significant components with eigenvalues greater than unity, accounting for 77% of the total variance. From the loadings of the variables, the most influential variables on the positive first principal component (PC1) were the caseins αs1-I-CN and αs1-II-CN, and for the negative PC1 they were β1-CN and the casein fragments I-αs1-CN and γ-CN (Fig. 2A1). The graphic representation of the 1-month-old cheeses in the space defined by the first two components did not show clear separation among the samples according to their SCC (Fig. 2B1). However, a certain separation of the Assaf breed samples was observed, these being located in the upper left quadrant. This result is in concordance with that observed in freshly made Assaf cheeses, characterized by a higher proteolytic activity that continued until this point of maturation. Similar results were found for the PCA for 2-month-old cheeses, where the score plot shows an overlapping among the samples with low, medium and high levels of SC.

Fig. 2. Loading plot (A) and score plot (B and C) of first two principal components for classification of samples of cheeses according their ripening time (1, 3 or 6 months), somatic cell accounts (B) or breed (C). Codes: 1=<500,000 SCC ml−1; 2=106–1·5×106 SCC ml−1; 3=2·5×106 SCC ml−1. A2=αs2-CN; A11=αs1-I-CN; A12=αs1-II-CN; A13=αs1-III-CN; B=β-CN; B2=β2-CN; B1=β1-CN; IA=I-αs1-CN; G=γ-CN.

The results obtained applying this statistical analysis to samples with three months of ripening revealed that PCA allowed 85% of the total variance to be explained by the four significant components found. From the loadings of the variables (Fig. 2A2), the most influential variables on the first principal component (PC1) were β2-CN, β-CN, αs1-II-CN, and αs1-I-CN with positive loading values, and again I-αs1-CN with negative loading values. For the second principal component (PC2), the most important variables were αs1-II-CN, αs1-I-CN, and αs2-CN (positive loadings) and β1-CN (negative loading). The samples of 3-month-old cheeses with low SCC were grouped and scattered to the right of the origin on the axis of PC1 (Fig. 2B1). This points to a lower degree of proteolysis, as evidenced by the fact that these samples were characterized by high concentrations of intact caseins; mainly, β2-CN, β-CN, αs1-II-CN, and αs1-I-CN. Unlike the results obtained for 1-month old cheeses, no groups according to breed were observed (Fig. 2C2), revealing a strong influence of SCC on the proteolytic process.

Regarding the results obtained with PCA for the 6-month-old cheeses (Fig. 2A3), four significant components with eigenvalues greater than unity were found, the two first PC accounting for almost 55·3% of the variance. There was positive contribution to PC1 by αs2-CN, αs1-I-CN, and β-CN and negative contribution by I-αs1-CN, γ-CN, and β1-CN with loading values of 0·77, 0·73, 0·703, −0·73, −0·55, and −0·55, respectively, while PC2 had a positive contribution from αs1-II-CN (loading value 0·63), and a negative contribution from β2-CN (loading value of −0·89). It can be observed that 6-month-old cheeses with low levels of SC were closely grouped and characterised by positive values of PC1, thus illustrating a more intense effect of SCC on the degree of casein hydrolysis as ripening progressed. The low SCC samples had the highest levels of intact alpha and beta caseins while the samples with medium and high SCC had negative PC1 values (Fig. 2B2). These cheeses showed a higher degree of hydrolysis, as evidenced by their higher levels in I-αs1-CN and γ-CN.

Previous studies have shown that the increase in SCC can increase plasmin activity in ewes' milk, enhancing the hydrolysis of β-CNs and their main proteolytic fragments, γ-CNs (Bianchi et al. Reference Bianchi, Bolla, Budelli, Caroli, Casoli, Pauselli and Duranti2004), as was observed here. However, the action of plasmin did not account for the increase in I-αs1-CN generated through the degradation of the αs1-CN fraction (Strickland et al. Reference Strickland, Johnson and Broadbent2001; Gorostiza et al. Reference Gorostiza, Cichoscki, Valduga, Valduga, Bernardi and Fresno2004). Thus, the increase in proteolysis of the αs1-CN fraction observed in high-SCC milk cheeses may be attributed to other endogenous milk enzymes, such as cathepsin D, or to enzymes from somatic cells, such as cathepsin G, elastase or cathepsin B (Considine et al. Reference Considine, Healy, Kelly and McSweeney2000, Reference Considine, Geary, Kelly and McSweeney2002, Reference Considine, Healy, Kelly and McSweeney2004).

Although there was no clear sample separation according to breed (Fig. 2C3), most of the Assaf samples had negative values of PC1 owing to their higher contents in casein fragments. This could be the reason for the lower overall consumer acceptability reported for Assaf cheeses (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Lurueña-Martínez and Vivar-Quintana2009a). Higher levels of proteolysis and the increase in the I-αs1-CN fragment are correlated with textural problems (Sousa et al. Reference Sousa, Ardo and McSweeney2001; Irigoyen et al. Reference Irigoyen, Izco, Ibáñez and Torre2000). The study of correlations among proteolytic fragments and sensory parameters of these cheeses (Revilla et al. Reference Revilla, Lurueña-Martínez and Vivar-Quintana2009a) revealed a positive correlation between graininess and both I-αs1-CN (0·489) and γ-CN (0·606), but also a positive correlation among these fragments and hardness (0·667 and 0·515, respectively). Indeed, higher levels of γ-CN were correlated with a lower creaminess (−0·478) and consumer preference (−0·538), pointing to the relevance of the proteolytic process on the sensory characteristics of cheeses.

Conclusions

The results obtained point to a significant increase in proteolysis as SCC levels rise. Thus, in freshly made cheeses the levels of αs1-I-CN and β-CNs were significantly lower as the SCC values increased. An important influence of breed was observed, the Castellana breed being the most affected by SCC. As ripening progressed, a decrease in the fat content and an increase in pH and fat acidity in high-SCC cheeses were observed. Indeed, the analysis by PCA of casein fractions and their fragments at different ripening times revealed that in the third and sixth months low-SCC cheeses were closely grouped and were characterised by the highest levels of intact caseins, while samples with medium and high SCC were characterised by their higher levels in I-αs1-CN and γ-CN.

Regarding breed, the results also point to a more intense proteolytic activity in Assaf breed cheeses, characterized by a strong decrease in intact caseins in freshly made cheeses and by the higher content of casein proteolytic fragments of the more matured cheeses.

Authors are grateful to Spanish Junta de Castilla y León (SA066/04) for financial support.

References

A.O.A.C. 1995 Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official methods of analysis of AOAC international (16th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
A.O.A.C. 2000 Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of analysis, method 935.42 ash of cheese. (17th ed.). Arlington, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
Albenzio, M, Caroprese, M, Santillo, A, Marino, R, Taibi, L & Sevi, A 2004 Effects of somatic cell count and stage of lactation on the plasmin activity and cheese-making properties of ewe milk. Journal of Dairy Science 87 533542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albillos, SM, Busto, MD, Pérez-Mateos, M & Ortega, N 2006 Prediction of the ripening times of ewe's milk cheese by multivariate regresión análisis of capillary electrophoresis casein fractions. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 54 (21) 82818287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, KC, Hayen, MJ, Morse, D & Wilcox, CJ 1988 Effect of pregnancy, milk yield, and somatic cell count on bovine milk fat hydrolysis. Journal of Dairy Science 71 925931CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbano, DM, Rasmussen, RR & Lynch, JM 1991 Influence of milk somatic cell count and milk age on cheese yield. Journal of Dairy Science 74 369388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, L, Bolla, A, Budelli, E, Caroli, A, Casoli, C, Pauselli, M & Duranti, E 2004 Effect of udder health status and lactation phase on the characteristics of Sardinian ewe milk. Journal of Dairy Science 87 24012408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Considine, T, Geary, S, Kelly, AL & McSweeney, PLH 2002 Proteolytic specificity of cathepsin G on bovine αs1- and β-caseins. Food Chemistry 76 5967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Considine, T, Healy, A, Kelly, AL & McSweeney, PLH 2000 Proteolytic specificity of elastase on bovine αs1-casein. Food Chemistry 69 1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Considine, T, Healy, A, Kelly, AL & McSweeney, PLH 2004 Hydrolysis of bovine caseins by cathepsin B, a cysteine proteinase indigenous to milk. International Dairy Journal 14 117124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creamer, LK 1970 Protein breakdown in Gouda cheese. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 5 152154Google Scholar
Delandes, H 1998 Etude de l'activité lipasique des cellules somatiques du lait de chèvre. [Study of lipase activity of goat milk somatic cells]. In Mémoire de DEA Génie Enzymatique, Bioconversion, Microbiologie (68 pp). Université de Technologie de Compiégne. CompiégneGoogle Scholar
DeRham, O & Andrews, AT 1982 Qualitative and quantitative determination of proteolysis in mastitic milk. Journal of Dairy Research 49 587596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantuz, F, Polidori, F, Cheli, F & Baldi, A 2001 Plasminogen activation system in goat milk and its elation with composition and coagulation properties. Journal of Dairy Science 84 17861790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, PF & McSweeney, PLH 1996 Proteolysis in cheese during ripening. Food Reviews International 12 457509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitas, AC, Fresno, JM, Prieto, B, Malcata, FX & Carballi, J 1997 Effects of ripening time and combination of ovine and caprine milks on proteolysis of Picante cheese. Food Chemistry 60 219229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, J, White, JH, Zavizion, B & Politis, I 1995 Effects of stage of lactation and somatic cell count on plasminogen activator activity in bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Research 62 141145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González-Rodríguez, M, Gonzalo, C, San Primitivo, F & Cármenes, P 1995 Relationship between somatic cell count and intramammary infection of the half udder in dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science 78 27532759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalo, C, Carriedo, JA, Blanco, MA, Beneitez, E, Juárez, MT, De la Fuente, LF & San Primitivo, F 2005 Factors of variation influencing bulk tank Somatic Cell Count in dairy sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 88 969974CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorostiza, A, Cichoscki, AJ, Valduga, AT, Valduga, A, Bernardi, A & Fresno, JM 2004 Changes in soluble nitrogenous compounds, caseins and free amino acids during ripening of artisanal prato cheese, a Brazilian sei-hard cows variety. Food Chemistry 85 407414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandison, AS & Ford, D 1986 Effects of variations in somatic cell count on rennet coagulation properties of milk and on the yield, composition and quality of Cheddar cheese. Journal of Dairy Research 53 645655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
I.S.O. 1975 Cheese. Determination of fat content. Van Gulik method (ISO 3433). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for StandarizationGoogle Scholar
Ibañez, FC, Torres, MI, Ordoñez, AI & Barcina, Y 1995 Effect of composition and ripening on casein breakdown in Idiazábal cheese. Chemie Mikrobiologie Technologie der Lebesnmittel 17 3745Google Scholar
IDF 1969 Determination of fat acidity. IDF Standard n°6A. Brussels, Belgium: International Dairy FederationGoogle Scholar
IDF 1982 Cheese and processed cheese. Determination of total solids content. IDF Standard 4A Brussels, Belgium: International Dairy Federation.Google Scholar
Irigoyen, A, Izco, JM, Ibáñez, FC & Torre, P 2000 Evaluation of the effect of rennet type on casein proteolysis in an ovine milk cheese by means of capillary electrophoresis. Journal of Cromatography A 881 5967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggi, JJ, Govindasamy-Lucey, S, Berger, YM, Johnson, ME, McKusick, BC, Thomas, DL & Wendorff, WL 2003 Hard ewe's milk cheese manufactured from milk of three different groups of somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 86 30823089CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, G, Chaffer, M, Caraso, Y, Ezra, E, Kababea, D, Winkler, M, Winkler, M, Glickman, A & Saran, A 2003 Udder infection and milk somatic cell count, NAGase activiy and milk composition-fat, protein and lactose- in Israeli-Assaf and Awassi sheep. Small Ruminant Research 49 157164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marino, R, Considine, T, Sevi, A, McSweeney, PLH & Kelly, AL 2005 Contribution of proteolytic activity associated with somatic cells in milk to cheese ripening. International Dairy Journal 15 10261033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, GE, Fedrick, JA & Rogers, SA 1986 The relationship between somatic cell count composition and manufacturing properties of bulk milk. 2. Cheddar cheese from farm bulk milk. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 41 1214Google Scholar
Mulhivill, DM & Fox, PF 1978 Proteolysis specificity of chymosins and pepsins on β-caseins. Milchwissenschaft 34 587590Google Scholar
Munro, EL, Grieve, PA & Kitchen, BJ 1984 Effects of mastitis on milk yield, milk composition, processing properties and yield and quality of milk products. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 39 716Google Scholar
Pirisi, A, Piredda, G, Corona, M, Pes, M, Pintus, S & Ledda, A 2000 Influence of somatic cell count on ewe's milk composition, cheese yield and cheese quality. In Proceedings of 6th Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium. Ontario, Canada. 4759Google Scholar
Pirisi, A, Piredda, G, Podda, F & Pintus, S 1996 Effect of somatic cell count on sheep milk composition and cheese making properties. In Somatic Cells and Milk of Small Ruminants EAAP Publ no 77, Ed Rubino, R. Wageningen: Wageningen press. 241251Google Scholar
Revilla, I, Lurueña-Martínez, MA & Vivar-Quintana, AM 2009a Influence of somatic cell counts and breed on physico-chemical and sensory characcteritics of hard ewe's-milk cheeses. Journal of Dairy Research 76 283289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revilla, I, Rodríguez-Nogales, JM & Vivar-Quintana, AM 2007 Proteolysis and texture of hard ewes’ milk cheese during ripening as affected by somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Research 74 127136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revilla, I, Rodríguez-Nogales, JM & Vivar-Quintana, AM 2009b Effect of somatic cell counts on ewe's milk protein profile and cheese-making properties in different sheep breeds reared in Spain. Journal of Dairy Research 76 210215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez-Nogales, JM, Vivar-Quintana, AM & Revilla, I 2007 Influence of somatic cell count and breed on capillary electrophoretic protein profiles of ewes’ milk: A chemometric study. Journal of Dairy Science 90 31873196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salih, AMA & Anderson, M 1979 Observations on the influence of high cell count on lipolysis in bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Research 46 453462CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sousa, MJ, Ardo, Y & McSweeney, PLH 2001 Advances in the study of proteolysis during cheese ripening. International Dairy Journal 11 327345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, M, Johnson, ME & Broadbent, JR 2001 Qualitative and quantitative of proteins and peptides in milk products by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 22 151015173.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trujillo, AJ, Guamis, B, Laencina, J & López, MB 2000 Proteolytic activities of some milk clotting enzymes on ovine casein. Food Chemistry 71 449457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdi, RJ, Barbano, DM, DellaValle, ME & Senyk, GF 1987 Variability in the protein, casein, nonprotein nitrogen, and proteolysis in high and low somatic cell milks. Journal of Dairy Science 70 230242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vivar-Quintana, AM, Beneitez de la Mano, E & Revilla, I 2006 Relationship between somatic cell counts and the properties of yogurt made from ewe's milk. International Dairy Journal 16 262267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zachos, T, Politis, I, Gorewit, RC & Barbano, DM 1992 Effect of mastitis on plasminogen activator activity of milk somatic cells. Journal of Dairy Research 59 461467CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Mean values and (SD) for composition parameters of cheeses depending on SCC or breed

Figure 1

Table 2. Mean values and (sd) for casein composition of freshly produced cheeses expressed as electropherogram area

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Loading plot (A) and score plot (B) of first two principal components for classification of samples of cheeses according their ripening time (0–6 months). Codes: A2=αs2-CN; A11=αs1-I-CN; A12=αs1-II-CN; A13=αs1-III-CN; B=β-CN; B2=β2-CN; B1=β1-CN; IA=I-αs1-CN; G=γ-CN.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Loading plot (A) and score plot (B and C) of first two principal components for classification of samples of cheeses according their ripening time (1, 3 or 6 months), somatic cell accounts (B) or breed (C). Codes: 1=<500,000 SCC ml−1; 2=106–1·5×106 SCC ml−1; 3=2·5×106 SCC ml−1. A2=αs2-CN; A11=αs1-I-CN; A12=αs1-II-CN; A13=αs1-III-CN; B=β-CN; B2=β2-CN; B1=β1-CN; IA=I-αs1-CN; G=γ-CN.