Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T20:17:27.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persistent left superior vena cava accompanying repaired tetralogy of Fallot: Does it pose a challenge for device implantation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2020

Ali Hakan Konuş*
Affiliation:
Trabzon Ahi Evren Gogus Kalp Ve Damar Cerrahisi Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi - Cardiology, Trabzon, Turkey
Muhammet Raşit Sayın
Affiliation:
Trabzon Ahi Evren Gogus Kalp Ve Damar Cerrahisi Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi - Cardiology, Trabzon, Turkey
Ahmet Vural
Affiliation:
Kocaeli Universitesi Tip Fakultesi - Cardiology, Kocaeli, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Ali Hakan Konuş; Trabzon Ahi Evren Gogus Kalp Ve Damar Cerrahisi Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi - Cardiology, Vatan Street. No: 9, Ortahisar/Trabzon, 61040, Turkey. Tel: +905386399020; Fax: +904622310483. E-mail: alihakankonus@icloud.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Persistent left superior vena cava is a thoracic venous return anomaly. Tetralogy of Fallot is one of the most common congenital anomalies seen with persistent left superior vena cava. We are presenting a successful cardiac resynchronisation therapy device implantation in a patient with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and persistent left superior vena cava combination which has not been previously reported in the literature.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Case

A 62-year-old male patient with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and persistent left superior vena cava presented with ongoing dyspnea despite optimal medical treatment (NYHA class III). At the time of operation of tetralogy of Fallot, the patient was 17 years old. In the patient’s history, there was no need for pulmonary valve replacement.

Electrocardiogram showed atrial fibrillation, right bundle branch block, and left anterior hemiblock. The QRS duration was 186 ms (Fig 1). Transthoracic echocardiography showed biventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction: 32%, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion: 10.2 mm). He had a dilated coronary sinus (31.6 mm). In transthoracic echocardiography, there was no right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (valvular or subvalvular) but only mild pulmonary regurgitation was present. The residual ventricular septal defect was not observed. The persistent left superior vena cava was detected by contrast echocardiography. A cardiac resynchronisation therapy device with defibrillator implantation was decided. Venography was performed through left subclavian vein access. The existence of persistent left superior vena cava was verified. An active fixation lead was preferred as the defibrillation electrode. This lead was advanced through the dilated coronary sinus to the right atrium.

Figure 1. Electrocardiogram with standard lead positioning before implantation.

A stylet with around angle of 110 degrees was folded in the right atrium and by advancing from here lead was finally fixed into the right ventricle. The coronary sinus branch was identified by light opaque injections from an angled lateral branch catheter in the access catheter. The support of the access catheter was increased by leaning its folding point on the opposite wall of the dilated coronary sinus. The lead of the quadripolar coronary sinus was successfully advanced through extra support wire. The atrial lead was not implanted because of permanent atrial fibrillation. After a cardiac resynchronisation therapy device with defibrillator implantation, the QRS width was 166 ms (Fig 2). The patient’s symptoms improved after the implantation (NYHA class II). Also, after 6 months of follow-up, the functional status remained the same.

Figure 2. Biventricular lead position after implantation (Panel a and c). Electrocardiogram after implantation (Panel b).

Discussion

The long-term survival rate of repaired tetralogy of Fallot patients is well. The number of repaired tetralogy of Fallot patients is increasing in the adult population.Reference Nollert, Fischlein, Bouterwek, Böhmer, Klinner and Reichart1 Beginning from the early post-operative period, patients present many conduction abnormalities (often right bundle branch block)Reference Hui, Slorach, Dragulescu, Mertens, Bijnens and Friedberg2 and these disorders tend to progress over time. Right ventricularReference Gatzoulis, Elliott and Guru3 and left ventricularReference Broberg, Aboulhosn and Mongeon4 systolic dysfunction can also be presented in repaired tetralogy of Fallot patients. In these situations, device implantation may be required. It has been reported that in short to medium term, significant clinical improvement has been observed following cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with operative tetralogy of Fallot and moderate or severely decreased left ventricular systolic functions.Reference Merchant, Kella, Book, Langberg and Lloyd5 A cardiac resynchronisation therapy device implantation in a patient with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and persistent left superior vena cava combination has not been previously reported in the literature. Persistent left superior vena cava was reported in 5.9% of tetralogy of Fallot patients.Reference Ari, Doğan and Özgür6 In patients with persistent left superior vena cava, cardiac resynchronisation therapy device implantation can be performed successfully through the persistent left superior vena cava despite several anatomical difficulties. We also performed successful implantation with the methods mentioned above.

Surgical techniques for the correction of tetralogy of Fallot have improved dramatically since the first operation was performed in 1955 and patients are living well into adulthood. With increased survival, increased morbidity secondary to long-term complications of tetralogy of Fallot is seen. So, it is important for the management of long-term outcomes of repaired tetralogy of Fallot patients.

Acknowledgements

None.

Financial Support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

References

Nollert, G, Fischlein, T, Bouterwek, S, Böhmer, C, Klinner, W, Reichart, B.Long-term survival in patients with repair of tetralogy of Fallot: 36-year follow-up of 490 survivors of the first year after surgical repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:13741383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hui, W, Slorach, C, Dragulescu, A, Mertens, L, Bijnens, B, Friedberg, MK.Mechanisms of right ventricular electromechanical dyssynchrony and mechanical inefficiency in children after repair of tetralogy of fallot. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:610618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatzoulis, MA, Elliott, JT, Guru, V, et al.Right and left ventricular systolic function late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:13521357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broberg, CS, Aboulhosn, J, Mongeon, FP, et al.Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in adults with repaired tetralogy of fallot. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:12151220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merchant, FM, Kella, D, Book, WM, Langberg, JJ, Lloyd, MS.Cardiac resynchronization therapy in adult patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014;37:321328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ari, ME, Doğan, V, Özgür, S, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava accompanying congenital heart disease in children: experience of a tertiary care center. Echocardiography. 2017;34:436440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Electrocardiogram with standard lead positioning before implantation.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Biventricular lead position after implantation (Panel a and c). Electrocardiogram after implantation (Panel b).