Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:10:26.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acquired cholesteatoma: summary of the cascade of molecular events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2013

L Louw*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
*
Address for correspondence: Dr L Louw, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa E-mail: gnanll.md@ufs.ac.za
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Cholesteatoma is considered a benign, gradually expanding and destructive epithelial lesion of the temporal bone. The pathogenesis of different classifications of cholesteatoma is marked by similar underlying cellular and molecular processes. Stepwise explanations of the histopathogenesis have been described previously. The current paper focuses on expounding the molecular events of cholesteatoma.

Method and results:

Cholesteatoma pathogenesis encompasses a complex network of signalling pathways during: epidermal hyperplasia, perimatrix–matrix interactions and mucosal disease. This paper presents a review of the molecular events driven by inflammatory mediators and enzymes during: cholesteatoma growth (cell proliferation and apoptosis); maintenance and deterioration (angiogenesis and hypoxia, oxidative stress and toxicity); and complications (bone erosion and hearing loss). The cascade of molecular events applicable to atelectasis and cholesteatoma that coexist with chronic otitis media and bone erosion as sequelae is summarised.

Conclusion:

The role of lipids in this disease is relatively unexplored, but there is evidence in support of fatty acid role-players that needs confirmation. Future directions in lipid research to delineate molecular mechanisms are proposed.

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Literature review

A general review of cholesteatoma was conducted. Literature searches (using Medline and PubMed) included clinical and experimental work carried out over the past three decades. The literature selection was limited to English language articles. The review focused primarily on inflammatory mediators and enzyme activities. The objectives of the study were to: give an account of the cascade of molecular events involved in cholesteatoma and the complications thereof, and identify future research directions for a better understanding of cholesteatoma pathogenesis and deterioration, and bone erosion.

Introduction

Cholesteatoma is considered a benign, gradually expanding and destructive epithelial lesion of the temporal bone which results in erosion of adjacent bony structures, leading to various complications. Bone erosion of the ossicular chain and otic capsule (i.e. the bony labyrinth) may result in hearing loss, vestibular dysfunction, facial paralysis and intracranial complications.Reference Louw1, Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2 The commonly accepted diagnostic classification of acquired cholesteatoma is that proposed by Tos (1993), which is based on site of origin.Reference Tos3 Although acquired cholesteatomas may have different origins, they share similar cellular and molecular processes.

A previous review article on cholesteatoma (Louw, 2010) provided stepwise explanations of the histopathogenesis.Reference Louw1 The current review article re-evaluated molecular events driven by inflammatory mediators and enzymes during the clinical course of acquired cholesteatoma (i.e. during hyperplasia and/or metaplasia, angiogenesis and hypoxia, oxidative stress and toxicity, and tissue degeneration and bone erosion).

Activities of lipid signalling pathways (i.e. fatty acid role-players and their enzyme activities) during hyperplasia and/or metaplasia (i.e. cell proliferation and anti-apoptosis), cell degeneration (i.e. pro-apoptosis and cell toxicity), and in complications (i.e. fatty acid substrates and enzyme activities that contribute to temporal bone erosion and nerve degeneration) are relatively unexplored. This paper summarises the cascade of molecular events applicable to atelectasis (with bone contact) and cholesteatoma (sacs or mass-like growths) that coexist with chronic otitis media and bone erosion as sequelae, as well as proposing future directions in lipid research.

Cholesteatoma overview

Pathogenesis and aetiology

In principle, a cholesteatoma can present either as a sac that contains keratin with a surrounding keratinising squamous epithelial layer (i.e. matrix) and an adjacent subepithelial connective tissue layer with a bounding mucous cuboidal epithelial layer (i.e. perimatrix), or as a mass-like growth (i.e. haphazard growth with dispersed keratin deposits). Cholesteatoma pathogenesis can be explained on the premises of different triggers (trauma or disease) and different theories (migration, hyperplasia or metaplasia), or a combination thereof, as described in the review article of Louw (2010).Reference Louw1

The following text briefly summarises excerpts from Louw's (2010) paper. Triggers for cholesteatoma onset are diverse and may involve tympanic membrane trauma (perforation, displacement, retraction and invagination), or disease (chronic inflammation) and/or diseased mucosa of the tympanic cavity (i.e. otitis media with effusion). Taken together, the onset of acquired cholesteatoma can be marked by: epidermal cell migration through tympanic membrane perforations to form mucocutaneous junctions (i.e. pre-cholesteatoma conditions, without inflammation); epidermal cell hyperplasia (i.e. protruding masses through tympanic membrane perforations or from intact tympanic membranes or retraction pockets into the tympanic cavity, triggered by inflammation), with either sac-like growths (i.e. papillary cone and sinus formation patterns that fuse with keratin in the sac) or mass-like growths (i.e. haphazard growth patterns with dispersed keratin); and diseased mucosa of the tympanic cavity (i.e. mucosal metaplasia) with an impact on the tympanic membrane (i.e. cholesteatoma formation with secondary perforation of the tympanic membrane, triggered by inflammation).Reference Louw1, Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2

The main aetiological factors in cholesteatoma development are: long-term eustachian tube dysfunction and reduced middle-ear pressure (i.e. poor pneumatisation in the middle ear and/or mastoid process), resulting in tympanic membrane retraction pockets and invaginations (i.e. atelectasis and adhesive otitis media); and inflammatory conditions (i.e. chronic otitis media with effusion), resulting in negative middle-ear pressure and tympanic membrane retraction pockets and invaginations.Reference Louw1, Reference Seibert and Danner4

Chronic inflammation and bacterial biofilms

Chronic inflammation plays an important role in the progression from pre-cholesteatoma conditions (i.e. mucocutaneous junctions, retraction pockets, atelectasis and adhesive otitis media) to cholesteatomas. The role of chronic inflammation in the clinical course of cholesteatoma is summarised in the following text. Bacterial otitis externa can trigger epidermal hyperplasia of the tympanic membrane, with epidermal projections into the tympanic cavity or epidermal ingrowths into the tympanic membrane. Persistent inflammation in tympanic membrane perimatrix and otitis media in the tympanic cavity are considered to be significant factors in cholesteatoma growth, expansion and invasion. Chronic otitis media is the culprit in diseased mucosa, and bouts of chronic infections contribute to cholesteatoma persistence and recurrence.Reference Chole, Sudhoff and Cummings5Reference Mustafa, Heta, Kastrai and Dreshaj8

Bacterial biofilms have been identified in cholesteatomas. Their actions can be described as either indirect signalling, wherein bacterial adherence to epithelial cells may lead to chronic infection and cell hyperproliferation, or direct signalling of bacterial products (endotoxins) that may elicit host immune responses.Reference Chole and Faddis9Reference Macassey and Dawes11Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen capable of forming biofilms, and is the most common organism isolated from infected cholesteatomas.Reference Wang, Jung, Nason, Pashia and Chole12 Bacterial biofilms can be responsible for inflammatory reactions that may lead to chronic inflammation. This includes biofilms that are: trapped in the external acoustic meatus; present in lacunae, sinuses or sacs within cholesteatomas; or located in hollows of the tympanic cavity.Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2, Reference Sudhoff and Tos6

Inflammatory mediators are produced by infiltrating immune cells (i.e. neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes) and local cells (such as keratinocytes and mast cells) in cholesteatomas.Reference Junh, Jung, Hoffman, Drew, Preciado and Sausen13 During initiation of otitis media, the complement part of the immune system (consisting of multiple components that can interact to form enzymes) is activated by bacterial endotoxins; depletion of these endotoxins (such as the chemotactic agent C5a that activates immune cells) is known to cause chronic otitis media.Reference Junh, Jung, Hoffman, Drew, Preciado and Sausen13 Research has revealed that bacterially infected cholesteatomas and chronic otitis media eventually disrupt the balance between bone formation (via osteoblasts) and bone resorption (via osteoclasts), leading to bone erosion.Reference Peek, Huisman, Berckmans, Sturk, van Loon and Grote14 Thus, middle-ear inflammatory mediators and toxins may result in ossicle erosion and hearing loss.Reference Junh, Jung, Hoffman, Drew, Preciado and Sausen13

Growth and deterioration

The more severe or chronic the inflammation, the greater the expected impact on cholesteatoma perimatrix–matrix interactions and layer thickness.Reference Dornelles, da Costa, Meurer and Schweiger15 Thus, chronic and recurrent inflammations determine aggressive growth, and angiogenesis (i.e. microvessel formations) is a prerequisite for tissue maintenance.Reference Nagai, Suganuma, Ide, Shimoda and Kato16 In addition, chronic inflammatory conditions in the tympanic cavity (and mastoid cells) can lead to the accumulation of thick mucous masses between mucosal folds and within pouches, which can impede ventilation and drainage, with consequent hypopneumatisation and hypoxia.Reference Sudhoff, Dazert, Gonzales, Borkowski, Park and Baird17, Reference Adunka, Gstoettner, Knecht and Kiener18 Hypoxic conditions in the tympanic cavity can contribute to tympanic membrane retraction pockets and invaginations that may lead to cholesteatoma onset and growth. Hypoxia eventually leads to microvessel occlusion, with consequent apoptosis and deterioration of cholesteatoma tissue components.Reference Olszewska, Chodynicki and Chyczewski19 Established cholesteatoma is marked by inflammatory granulation tissue, and fetid exudates and flakes of keratin are present.

Molecular overview

Details of the molecular events that occur during the clinical course of cholesteatoma have been described previously; these are briefly depicted below. The research findings focus on growth (cellular overproduction and apoptosis), development (expansion and invasion) and destructive properties (bone erosion and hearing loss).

Cholesteatoma pathogenesis

Cholesteatoma is a growth disorder, and the epidermal growth factor receptor and keratinocyte growth factor receptor are up-regulated in cholesteatoma pathogenesis,Reference Alves, Pereira, Carvalho M de, Fregnani and Ribeiro20Reference Jin, Min, Jeong, Park and Lee23 as is the ligand for the epidermal growth factor receptor, namely amphiregulin.Reference Macias, Gerkin and Macias24 In addition, increased p63 expression and keratinocyte markers demonstrate uncoordinated hyperproliferation, migration and invasion properties.Reference Kucczkowski, Pawelczyk, Bakowska, Narozny and Mikaszewski25Reference Park, Min, Min, Jun, Seo and Kim28 The cell cycle inhibitory protein p27 is down-regulated,Reference Kuczkowski, Bakowska, Pawelczyk, Narozny and Mikaszewski29 and the ErbB-2 protein for accelerated cell proliferation and apoptosis is over-expressed.Reference Sakamoto, Kondo, Yamasodba, Suzuki, Sugasawa and Kaga30 The c-jun protein (associated with proliferation), c-myc protein (associated with differentiation) and p53 tumour suppressor gene (associated with apoptosis) are all up-regulated in cholesteatoma.Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2, Reference Osturk, Yildirim, Ascar, Cenik and Keles31, Reference Motamed, Powe, Kendall, Birchall and Banerjee32 The ras protein (present in keratinocyte membranes) serves as a switch and activates mitogen-activated protein kinases for the transcription of proliferation genes (via c-jun present in keratinocyte nuclei).Reference Huang, Chen, Huang and Shinoda33 Caspases-3, -8 and -14 signalling pathways play important roles in apoptotic or terminal differentiation of the matrix and accumulation of keratin debris.Reference Miyao, Shinoda and Takahashi34, Reference Jung, Lee, Cho, Jung, Hwang and Chae35 Survival (anti-apoptotic) signalling pathways, such as those of phosphoinositide 3 kinase-AKT (protein kinase B) and phosphorylated extracellular-regulated kinases 1 and 2, are up-regulated in cholesteatoma perimatrix.Reference Huisman, De Heer and Grote36, Reference Huisman, De Heer and Grote37 Enhanced vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor 2 expressions can stimulate the production of collagenase and plasminogen activators to enhance fibroblast proliferation and angiogenesis.Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2, Reference Sudhoff, Dazert, Gonzales, Borkowski, Park and Baird17, Reference Niam, Chang, Sadick, Bayerl, Bran and Hormann38 Derailment of the matrix metalloproteinases system plays an active role in cholesteatoma invasion of middle-ear spaces.Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2, Reference Morales, Penido N de, da Silva, Stavale, Guilherme and Fukuda39

It is suggested that enhanced human β-defensin 2 and 3 in cholesteatoma may induce an innate immune response.Reference Song, Chae, Woo, Lee, Jung and Hwang40 It is also suggested that cell-mediated immunity has an important role in cholesteatoma development and its auto-destructive properties, based on a predominance of T lymphocytes (cluster of differentiation 3+) and histiocytes (cluster of differentiation 68+) in invasive cholesteatomas.Reference Hussein, Sayed and Abu-Dief41 In addition, the enhanced expression of transforming growth factor β by fibroblasts during cholesteatoma pathogenesis supports the idea that the cholesteatoma activity is similar to that of a chronic wound healing process.Reference Huisman, de Heer, Dijke and Grote42 Transforming growth factor β is an important trigger for the production of extracellular matrix components (i.e. fibronectin, collagen, integrins and glycosaminoglycans) that are linked with cell adhesion, migration, growth and differentiation.Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2

Cholesteatoma complications

The role of osteoclasts in bone erosion has been firmly established.Reference Jung and Chole43 Among molecular mediators implicated in bone resorption are: liposomal enzymes (such as acid hydrolyses) including matrix metalloproteinases and hexosaminidase A;Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2, Reference Morales, Penido N de, da Silva, Stavale, Guilherme and Fukuda39, Reference Olszweska, Borzym-Kluczyk, Olszweska, Rogowski and Zwierz44 cytokines (i.e. interleukins (ILs) 1 and 6, and tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α));Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2, Reference Vitale and Ribeiro F de45 pro-inflammatory fatty acid metabolites (such as prostaglandin E2);Reference Yuan, Akiyama, Nakahama, Sato, Uematsu and Morita46 nuclear transcription factors (such as nuclear factor κβ);Reference Byun, Yune, Lee, Yeo and Park47 bacteria (lipopolysaccharide);Reference Iino, Toriyama, Ogawa and Kawakami48 and specific pH activities (i.e. demineralisation by acidic cholesteatomas).Reference Olszewska, Wagner, Bernal-Sprekelson, Ebmeyer, Dazert and Hildmann2 Previous research indicated that IL-1 and IL-6 can stimulate hexosaminidase (specifically N-acetyl-β-D-hexosaminidase) activity that may lead to bone erosion.Reference Olszweska, Borzym-Kluczyk, Olszweska, Rogowski and Zwierz44 More advanced research revealed that TNF-α, together with IL-1 and receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand (ligands for activating nuclear factor κβ receptors), contribute to bone erosion.Reference Nason, Jung and Chole49 The above-mentioned research findings correlated with bone erosion in the presence of chronic otitis media, with or without cholesteatoma. With respect to sensorineural hearing loss, it was previously suggested that during chronic suppurative otitis media (with or without cholesteatoma), the passage of bacterial endotoxins through the round window may cause damage to hair cells in the cochlear base.Reference Hellstrom, Eriksson, Yoon and Johansson50

Lipid overview

The cascade of cellular, molecular and biochemical processes during the clinical course of cholesteatoma still needs to be properly defined. Foremost, the role of lipids (i.e. fatty acid role-players) during cholesteatoma pathogenesis and its complications need to be addressed, and is therefore briefly outlined below.

Membrane lipids in human cells and bacteria

In the bilipid membrane of a human cell, the phospholipid class and its subclasses are considered the most important lipids. Each class or subclass consists of a fatty acid composition or profile. Fatty acids play critical roles in membrane to nucleus gene regulation and immune responses, and are mediated by a complex array of signalling pathways. Upon stimulation, arachidonic acid is released from membrane phospholipids by phospholipase A2. Arachidonic acid is a source for the production of inflammatory metabolites via cyclo-oxygenase and lipoxygenase activities. Prostaglandin E2 production via cyclo-oxygenase-2 activity plays a crucial role during chronic otitis media. During inflammatory conditions, neutrophils (a major component of phagocytic cells) produce oxygen free radicals (oxidants) via inducible nitric oxide synthases, namely reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide (NO), which cause cell damage. Free radical scavengers (antioxidants), such as superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase, have a protective effect against oxidative damage.Reference Junh, Jung, Hoffman, Drew, Preciado and Sausen13, Reference Aggarwal, Shishodia, Sandur, Pandey and Sethi51, Reference Valko, Leibfritz, Moncol, Cronin, Mazur and Telser52 It was demonstrated that superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase were significantly depleted in cholesteatomas, but there was no correlation with bone erosion.Reference Eskiizmir, Yuceturk, Onur, Var and Temiz53 Arachidonic acid is also a source for lipid peroxidation by free radicals, and the formation of harmful hydroperoxides reduces membrane fluidity and permeability, causing it to collapse. In addition, lipid hydroperoxides can decompose to yield a range of highly cytotoxic aldehydes, which can further perpetuate tissue damage. It was suggested that an increase in oxidative stress occurs in inflammatory conditions as a consequence of elevations in: phospholipase A2, inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclo-oxygenase-2 and lipoxygenase activities. This leads to increased arachidonic acid release, faster arachidonic acid oxygenation, and increased reactive oxygen species and NO production, which triggers lipid peroxidation and cell damage.Reference Aggarwal, Shishodia, Sandur, Pandey and Sethi51, Reference Valko, Leibfritz, Moncol, Cronin, Mazur and Telser52

In bacteria, the outer layer of the bilipid membrane predominantly contains lipopolysaccharides, while the inner layer is composed mainly of phospholipids. Lipopolysaccharide essentially comprises a lipid A component, consisting mainly of saturated fatty acids with carbon chain lengths from 10 to 18, and a polysaccharide component that interacts with the environment as a defence mechanism.54 Bacterial lipopolysaccharide stimulates the release of arachidonic acid and the production of prostaglandin E2 metabolites and NO radicals during chronic otitis media, and thereby increases mucous secretion and bone erosion. Recently, there has been progression in our understanding of endotoxin lipopolysaccharide as a potent inducer of inflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of otitis media and sequelae.Reference Junh, Jung, Hoffman, Drew, Preciado and Sausen13 Moreover, lipopolysaccharides can stimulate neutrophils for the release of antimicrobial myeloperoxidase under conditions of oxidative stress. Myeloperoxidase reacts with hydrogen peroxide in neutrophil phagolysosomes to form a complex for the oxidation of chloride to hypochlorous acid and other toxic products. In cholesteatoma, excessive secretion of reactive oxygen species and myeloperoxidase has been shown to be correlated with bone erosion.Reference Celebi, Paksoy, Aydin, Sanh, Tasdemir and Gull55

Fatty acid role-players during cell growth and apoptosis

Environmental factors (i.e. bacteria, viruses, fungi, free radicals and other foreign particles) can interfere with essential fatty acid metabolism (i.e. metabolism of the omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acid series) with linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid as substrates respectively, by inhibiting Δ6 and Δ5 desaturase activities.Reference Horrobin56, Reference Das57 Essential fatty acid metabolism of the omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acid series is illustrated in Figure 1. Under these circumstances, de novo fatty acid synthase activity is up-regulated during glucose metabolism, with overproduction of palmitic acid as the end product.Reference Shah, Dhir, Golli, Chandran, Lewis and Acquafondata58 Based on research evidence, it is apparent that excessive linoleic acid, a ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, drives the mitogenetic signalling pathway, and that excessive palmitic acid, a ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ, drives the apoptotic signalling pathway. However, the eventual over-expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ contributes to apoptotic resistance, which results in conditions of cellular overproduction (e.g. hyperplasia and metaplasia).Reference Martinasso, Oraldi, Trombetta, Maggiora and Bertetto59 Notably, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ is reported to be up-regulated in cholesteatoma.Reference Hwang, Kang, Song, Kang, Woo and Chae60 Moreover, linoleic acid peroxidation products, namely 9- and 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid metabolites, which are activators and ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, have the capacity to induce apoptosis.Reference Niki, Yoshida, Saito and Noguchi61 In retrospect, linoleic acid and arachidonic acid are excellent sources for free radical attack, oxidative stress and cell damage. Although the role of arachidonic acid in the clinical course of cholesteatomas has been firmly established, the role of linoleic acid still needs to be confirmed.

Fig. 1 Essential fatty acid metabolism of the omega-6 and 3 fatty acid series. Essential fatty acids include: linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid, which must be consumed by the diet; and γ-linolenic acid, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, which can be consumed by the diet or metabolised in the body. (Fatty acid nomenclature using the example ‘C18:2’: 18 = number of carbon atoms; 2 = number of double bonds.) Elongases are enzymes that elongate the carbon chain by two carbon units, desaturases introduce an additional double bond and β-oxidation refers to the shortening of the carbon chain by two units. Inflammatory metabolites include: prostaglandins and thromboxanes, which are produced via cyclo-oxygeneases; and leukotrienes, produced via lipoxygenases.

Bacterial interference with lipid metabolism may also cause accumulation of very long chain fatty acids (more than 22 carbon atoms), which requires peroxisomal β-oxidation by catalase activity. Peroxisomal β-oxidation is known to be inhibited by endotoxin lipopolysaccharides (i.e. the conversion of hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen); cells with very long chain fatty acids are rendered toxic and they become apoptotic.Reference Khan, Contreras and Sing62 Not surprisingly, cholesteatoma debris was previously associated with bone erosion.Reference Iino, Toriyama, Ogawa and Kawakami48 The accumulation of very long chain fatty acids in the epithelial cells of cholesteatoma and their toxicity needs to be confirmed or refuted. Of relevance to cholesteatoma is that newly formed tissue masses are maintained by angiogenesis and a constant supply of systemic dietary lipids. The latter explains why there is no exhaustion of lipid sources and why a cascade of events contributes to cholesteatoma growth and expansion, up to a point where hypoxia and microvessel occlusion lead to cholesteatoma degeneration. It has been revealed that under hypoxic conditions, the hypoxia inducible factor stimulates matrix metalloproteinases that cause cholesteatoma perimatrix degeneration.Reference Knowles, Cleton-Jansen, Korsching and Athanasou63

Fatty acid role-players during chronic inflammation and bone erosion

Central to inflammation are the inflammatory mediators produced by epithelial and endothelial cells, as well as immune infiltrates. These mediators either fight off infection or damage tissues, depending on overproduction, inhibition or an imbalance among family members. It is evident that lipopolysaccharides stimulate tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) production, which plays a pivotal role during infection in cholesteatoma and chronic otitis media conditions. Although mainly produced by macrophages, keratinocytes and epithelial cells also have the potential to induce TNF-α activity in cholesteatoma. Tumour necrosis factor α has the capacity to stimulate matrix metalloproteinases involved in cholesteatoma degradation and bone erosion. It can also induce excessive mucous secretion in chronic otitis media (with or without effusion) via mechanisms that stimulate inducible nitric oxide synthases and toxic NO production, which may also lead to cholesteatoma degradation and bone erosion.Reference Junh, Jung, Hoffman, Drew, Preciado and Sausen13

Linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid and arachidonic acid are known to be potent natural ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ. Furthermore, arachidonic acid and γ-linolenic acid metabolites are known to induce receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand and osteoclastogenesis (via cyclo-oxygenase-2 activities).Reference Junh, Jung, Hoffman, Drew, Preciado and Sausen13, Reference O'Shea, Bassagaya-Riera and Mohede64 However, the mechanisms involved still need elucidating.

Cascade of molecular events

It is proposed that lipopolysaccharides interfere with the first step in essential fatty acid metabolism, and that enhanced linoleic acid (and α-linolenic acid) stimulates epithelial hyperplasia, while enhanced fatty acid synthase activity induces palmitic acid overproduction with cell apoptotic resistance. Research has revealed that lipopolysaccharides stimulate prostaglandin E2 production (via arachidonic acid release) and tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) production (mostly via macrophage stimulation). The following text briefly outlines the network of interactions involved. Lipopolysaccharides stimulate phospholipids for arachidonic acid release from membrane lipids. Arachidonic acid is a substrate for prostaglandin E2 production via cyclo-oxygenase-2 activity (stimulated by various factors, including enhanced saturated fatty acid levels and TNF-α). Enhanced prostaglandin E2 and TNF-α activate nuclear factor κβ expression that, in turn, stimulates prostaglandin E2 and TNF-α production. Under inflammatory conditions, enhanced reactive oxygen species and NO production (stimulated by phagocytes) enhance arachidonic acid (and linoleic acid) lipid peroxidation, and free radicals also activate nuclear factor κβ that, in turn, stimulates free radical production.Reference Junh, Jung, Hoffman, Drew, Preciado and Sausen13, Reference Aggarwal65 The feedback mechanisms of nuclear factor κβ are illustrated in Figure 2.

Fig. 2 Nuclear factor κβ feedback mechanisms. This transcription factor is activated by eicosanoids, cytokines, growth factors and free radicals, and in turn, stimulates eicosanoids, cytokines, growth factors and oncogenes (see Cascade of molecular events).

Previous cholesteatoma research has revealed that: NO synthase and toxic NO overproduction are involved in cholesteatoma degeneration and/or bone resorption;Reference Jung, Lin, Ramos, Faddis and Chole66 matrix metalloproteinases, such as collagenases (stimulated by lipopolysaccharides and TNF-α), are involved in perimatrix collagen degeneration and bone erosion;Reference Morales, Penido N de, da Silva, Stavale, Guilherme and Fukuda39 and N-acetyl-β-D-hexosaminidase, together with interleukins (ILs) 1 and 6 (stimulated by lipopolysaccharides and TNF-α), are involved in bone resorption.Reference Yuan, Akiyama, Nakahama, Sato, Uematsu and Morita46 More advanced research has shown that: TNF-α, together with IL-1 and receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand (a family member of TNF-α and ligand for osteoprotegerin), are involved in osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption.Reference Junh, Jung, Hoffman, Drew, Preciado and Sausen13 In this paper, it is proposed that lipopolysaccharides and TNF-α inhibit catalases and peroxisomal β-oxidation of very long chain fatty acids, whereby these toxic (apoptotic) cells and/or their debris cause cholesteatoma degeneration, bone erosion and nerve degradation. This assumption is based on the rationale that the accumulation of very long chain fatty acids (tetracosanoic acid (C 24:00) and hexacosanoic acid (C 26:00)) in different tissues or biological fluids can lead to progressive demyelination of the peripheral nervous system.Reference Deon, Garcia, Sitta, Barschak, Coelho and Graziela67

The cascade of molecular events applicable to atelectasis (with bone contact) and cholesteatomas (sacs or mass-like growths), which co-exist with chronic otitis media and bone erosion as sequelae, are depicted in Tables I and II. Evidently, the degree of bone erosion and/or resorption depends on a cumulative effect of the events involved.

Table I Cascade of events during atelectasis*

* With bone contact. OM = otitis media; HIF = hypoxia inducible factor; MMP = matrix metalloproteinase; LPS = lipopolysaccharide; TNF-α = tumour necrosis factor α; PGE2 = prostaglandin E2; PLA = phospholipase A; AA = arachidonic acid; MEE = middle-ear effusion; NOS = nitric oxide synthase; NO = nitric oxide

Table II Cascade of events during cholesteatoma development*

* For both sacs or mass-like growths. Chol = cholesteatoma; COM = chronic otitis media; α- LA = alpha linolenic acid; AA = arachidonic acid; ∆6d = Δ6 desaturase; PA = palmitic acid; FAS = fatty acid synthase; VLCFA = very long chain fatty acid; DHA = docosahexaenoic acid; HIF = hypoxia inducible factor; MMP = metalloproteinase; NO = nitric oxide; NOS = nitric oxide synthase; SOD = superoxide dismutase; GP = glutathione peroxidase; CAT = catalase; MPO = myeloperoxidase; HOCL = hypochlorous acid; LPS = lipopolysaccharide; PLA = phospholipase A; PGE2 = prostaglandin E2; COX-2 = cyclo-oxygenase-2; OM = otitis media; TNF-α = tumour necrosis factor α; NF-κβ = nuclear factor κβ; MEE = middle-ear effusion; IL = interleukin; AOM = acute otitis media; HEX = hexosaminidase; RANKL = receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand

Future directions

It is clear from the preceding information on lipids that there is a need to construct a complete lipid model that can serve as a sound foundation for further research. The model would consist of: lipid classes, such as total lipids, neutral lipids and membrane lipids (i.e. phospholipids, triglycerides and cholesterol esters); phospholipid subclasses (namely phosphatidyletanolamine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol); and free fatty acids. The question that remains is: to what extent do fatty acids, direct or indirect, contribute to cholesteatoma pathogenesis (growth and deterioration) and complications (bone destruction and related neuropathies)? Investigation into the role of lipids is warranted. This should comprise advanced lipid analyses (lipidomics), and special reference should be given to fatty acid role-players and enzyme activities that occur during pathogenesis and complications of cholesteatoma.

Conclusion

The phenomenon of cholesteatoma has been extensively researched. There are on-going attempts to unravel all the mechanisms involved at a biochemical level. It is clear from the above discussion that there is also a lipid research field open for exploration.

References

1Louw, L. Acquired cholesteatoma pathogenesis: stepwise explanations. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:587–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Olszewska, E, Wagner, M, Bernal-Sprekelson, M, Ebmeyer, J, Dazert, S, Hildmann, H et al. Etiopathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Tos, M. Manual of Middle Ear Surgery. New York: Thieme, 1993Google Scholar
4Seibert, JW, Danner, CJ. Eustachian tube function and the middle ear. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2006;39:1221–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Chole, RA, Sudhoff, HH. Chronic otitis media, mastoiditis and petrositis. In Cummings, Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, 4th edn: Mosby Elsevier, 2005;4:29883003Google Scholar
6Sudhoff, H, Tos, M. Pathogenesis of sinus cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:137–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Mishiro, Y, Sakagami, M, Kitahara, T, Kondoh, K, Okumura, S. The investigation of the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma using Kaplein-Meier survival analysis. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:803–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Mustafa, A, Heta, A, Kastrai, B, Dreshaj, SH. Complications of chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma during a 10-year period in Kosovo. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:1477–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Chole, RA, Faddis, BT. Evidence for microbial biofilms in cholesteatomas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1129–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Post, JC, Hiller, NL, Nistico, L, Stoodley, P, Ehrlich, GD. The role of biofilms in otolaryngologic infections: update 2007. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;15:347–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Macassey, E, Dawes, P. Biofilms and their role in otorhinolaryngological disease. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:1273–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Wang, E, Jung, J, Nason, R, Pashia, M, Chole, R. Characterization of otopathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a biofilm phenotype. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:983–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Junh, SK, Jung, M-K, Hoffman, MD, Drew, BR, Preciado, DA, Sausen, NJ et al. The role of inflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of otitis media and sequelae. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2008;1:117–38Google Scholar
14Peek, FAW, Huisman, M, Berckmans, RJ, Sturk, A, van Loon, J, Grote, JJ. Lipopolysaccharide concentration and bone resorption in cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:709–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Dornelles, C, da Costa, SS, Meurer, L, Schweiger, C. Correlation of cholesteatomas perimatrix thickness with patient's age. Rev Bras J Otorrinolaringol 2005;6:792–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Nagai, T, Suganuma, T, Ide, S, Shimoda, H, Kato, S. Confirmation of mucin in lymphatic vessels of acquired cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:361–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Sudhoff, H, Dazert, S, Gonzales, AM, Borkowski, G, Park, SY, Baird, A et al. Angiogenesis and angiogenic growth factors in middle ear cholesteatoma. Am J Otol 2000;21:793–8Google ScholarPubMed
18Adunka, O, Gstoettner, W, Knecht, R, Kiener, AC. Expression of hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha and Von Hippel Lindau protein in human middle ear cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1210–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Olszewska, E, Chodynicki, S, Chyczewski, L. Apoptosis in the pathogenesis of cholesteatoma in adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:409–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Alves, AL, Pereira, CSB, Carvalho M de, FP, Fregnani, JHTG, Ribeiro, FQ. EGFR expression in acquired middle ear cholesteatoma in children and adults. Eur J Pediatr 2012;171:307–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Barbara, M, Raffa, S, Mure, C, Manni, V, Ronchetti, F, Monini, S et al. Keratinocyte growth factor receptor (KGF-R) in cholesteatoma tissue. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:360–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Yamamoto-Fukuda, T, Takahasi, H, Koji, T. Expression of keratinocyte growth factor and its receptor in a middle ear cavity problem. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:7681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Jin, BJ, Min, HJ, Jeong, JH, Park, CW, Lee, SH. Expression of EGFR and microvessel density in middle ear cholesteatoma. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2011;4:6771CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Macias, MP, Gerkin, RD, Macias, JD. Increased amphiregulin expression as a biomarker of cholesteatoma activity. Laryngoscope 2010;120:2258–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Kucczkowski, J, Pawelczyk, T, Bakowska, A, Narozny, W, Mikaszewski, B. Expression of patterns of Ki-67 and telomerase activity in middle ear cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:204–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Olszewska, E, Lautermann, J, Koc, C, Schwaab, M, Dazert, S, Hildmann, H et al. Cytokeratin expression pattern in congenital and acquired pediatric cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262:731–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Olszewska, E, Sudhoff, H. Comparative cytokeratin distribution patterns in cholesteatoma epithelium. Histol Histopathol 2007;22:3742Google ScholarPubMed
28Park, HR, Min, SK, Min, K, Jun, SY, Seo, J, Kim, HJ. Increased expression of p63 and survivin in cholesteatomas. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;129:268–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Kuczkowski, J, Bakowska, J, Pawelczyk, T, Narozny, W, Mikaszewski, B. Cell cycle inhibitory protein p27 in human middle ear cholesteatoma. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2006;68:296301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Sakamoto, T, Kondo, K, Yamasodba, T, Suzuki, M, Sugasawa, M, Kaga, K. Over-expression of ErbB-2 protein in middle ear cholesteatomas. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1988–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Osturk, K, Yildirim, MS, Ascar, H, Cenik, Z, Keles, B. Evaluation of c-myc status in primary acquired cholesteatoma by using fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:588–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Motamed, M, Powe, D, Kendall, C, Birchall, JP, Banerjee, AR. p53 Expression and keratinocyte hyperproliferation in middle ear cholesteatoma. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002;27:505–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Huang, CC, Chen, CT, Huang, TS, Shinoda, H. Mediation of signal transduction in keratinocytes of human middle ear cholesteatoma by ras protein. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996;253:385–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Miyao, M, Shinoda, H, Takahashi, S. Caspase-3, caspase-8 and nuclear factor-kappa beta expression in human cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:8–1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Jung, MH, Lee, JH, Cho, JG, Jung, HH, Hwang, SJ, Chae, SW. Expressions of caspase-14 in human middle ear cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 2008;118:1047–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Huisman, MA, De Heer, E, Grote, JJ. Terminal differentiation and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in human cholesteatoma epithelium. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:422–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Huisman, MA, De Heer, E, Grote, JJ. Survival signaling and terminal differentiation in cholesteatoma epithelium. Acta Otolaryngol 2007;127:424–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Niam, R, Chang, RC, Sadick, H, Bayerl, C, Bran, G, Hormann, K. Effect of vascular endothelial growth factor on fibroblasts from external auditory canal cholesteatoma. Arch Med Res 2005;36:518–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Morales, SD, Penido N de, O, da Silva, NID, Stavale, JN, Guilherme, A, Fukuda, Y. Matrix metalloproteinase 2: an important genetic marker for cholesteatomas. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2007;73:51–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Song, JJ, Chae, SW, Woo, JS, Lee, HM, Jung, HH, Hwang, SJ. Differential expression of human beta defensin 2 and human beta defensin 3 in human middle ear cholesteatoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007;116:235–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Hussein, MRA, Sayed, RM, Abu-Dief, EE. Immune cell profile in invasive cholesteatomas: preliminary findings. Exp Mol Pathol 2010;88:316–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Huisman, MA, de Heer, E, Dijke, PT, Grote, JJ. Transforming growth factor beta and wound healing in human cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 2007;118:94–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Jung, JY, Chole, RA. Bone resorption in chronic otitis media: the role of the osteoclast. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002;64:95107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Olszweska, E, Borzym-Kluczyk, M, Olszweska, S, Rogowski, M, Zwierz, K. Hexosaminidase as a new potential marker for middle ear cholesteatoma. Clin Biochem 2006;39:1088–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Vitale, RF, Ribeiro F de, AQ. The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in bone resorption present in middle ear cholesteatoma. Bras J Otorrinolaringol 2007;73:123–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Yuan, J, Akiyama, M, Nakahama, K-I, Sato, T, Uematsu, H, Morita, I. The effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids and their metabolites on osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 2010;92:8590CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Byun, JY, Yune, TY, Lee, JY, Yeo, SG, Park, MS. Expression of CYLD and NF-κB in human cholesteatoma epithelium. Mediators Inflamm 2010;2010:796315. Epub 2010 Apr 21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Iino, Y, Toriyama, M, Ogawa, H, Kawakami, M. Cholesteatoma debris as an activator of human monocytes. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1990;110:410–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Nason, R, Jung, JY, Chole, RA. Lipopolysaccharide-induced osteoclastogenesis from mononuclear precursors: a mechanism for osteolysis in chronic otitis. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2009;10:151–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Hellstrom, S, Eriksson, PQ, Yoon, YJ, Johansson, U. Interactions between the middle ear and the inner ear: bacterial products. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997;830:110–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51Aggarwal, BB, Shishodia, S, Sandur, SK, Pandey, MK, Sethi, G. Inflammation and cancer: how hot is the link? Biochem Pharmacol 2006;72:1605–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Valko, M, Leibfritz, D, Moncol, J, Cronin, MTD, Mazur, M, Telser, MJ. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007;39:4484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Eskiizmir, G, Yuceturk, AV, Onur, E, Var, A, Temiz, P. The imbalance of enzymatic antioxidants in cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;129:1187–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Online textbook of bacteriology. In: http://textbookofbacteriology.net [30 January 2012]Google Scholar
55Celebi, O, Paksoy, M, Aydin, S, Sanh, A, Tasdemir, O, Gull, AE. Myeloperoxydase activity in the pathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;62:32–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Horrobin, DF. Medical uses of essential fatty acids. Vet Dermatol 1994;4:161–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Das, UN. Essential fatty acids: a review. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2006;7:467–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Shah, US, Dhir, R, Golli, SM, Chandran, UR, Lewis, D, Acquafondata, M et al. Fatty acid synthase gene overexpression and copy number gain in prostate adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 2006;37:401–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Martinasso, G, Oraldi, G, Trombetta, A, Maggiora, M, Bertetto, M. Involvement of PPARs in cell proliferation and apoptosis in human colon cancer specimens and in normal and cancer cell lines. PPAR Res 2007;2007:93416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60Hwang, SJ, Kang, HJ, Song, JJ, Kang, JS, Woo, JS, Chae, SW et al. Up-regulation of peroxidase proliferator-activated receptor gamma in cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 2006;116:5861CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61Niki, E, Yoshida, Y, Saito, Y, Noguchi, N. Lipid peroxidation: mechanisms, inhibition, and biological effects. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;338:668–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Khan, M, Contreras, M, Sing, I. Endotoxin-induced alterations of lipid and fatty acid compositions in rat liver peroxisomes. J Endotoxin Res 2000;6:4150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63Knowles, HJ, Cleton-Jansen, A-M, Korsching, E, Athanasou, NA. Hypoxia-inducible factor regulates osteoclast-mediated bone resorption: role of angiopoietin-like 4. FASEB J 2010;24:4648–59Google ScholarPubMed
64O'Shea, M, Bassagaya-Riera, J, Mohede, IC. Immunomodulatory properties of conjugated linoleic acid. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:1199S1206SCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65Aggarwal, BB. Nuclear factor-kappa B: a transcription factor for all seasons. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2007;11:109–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Jung, JY, Lin, AC, Ramos, LM, Faddis, BT, Chole, RA. Nitric oxide synthase I mediates osteoclast activity in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Biochem 2003;89:613–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67Deon, M, Garcia, MP, Sitta, A, Barschak, AG, Coelho, M, Graziela, O et al. Hexacosanoic acid and docosanoic acids plasma levels in patients with cerebral childhood and asymptomatic X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: Lorenzo's effect. Metab Brain Dis 2008;23:43–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Essential fatty acid metabolism of the omega-6 and 3 fatty acid series. Essential fatty acids include: linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid, which must be consumed by the diet; and γ-linolenic acid, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, which can be consumed by the diet or metabolised in the body. (Fatty acid nomenclature using the example ‘C18:2’: 18 = number of carbon atoms; 2 = number of double bonds.) Elongases are enzymes that elongate the carbon chain by two carbon units, desaturases introduce an additional double bond and β-oxidation refers to the shortening of the carbon chain by two units. Inflammatory metabolites include: prostaglandins and thromboxanes, which are produced via cyclo-oxygeneases; and leukotrienes, produced via lipoxygenases.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Nuclear factor κβ feedback mechanisms. This transcription factor is activated by eicosanoids, cytokines, growth factors and free radicals, and in turn, stimulates eicosanoids, cytokines, growth factors and oncogenes (see Cascade of molecular events).

Figure 2

Table I Cascade of events during atelectasis*

Figure 3

Table II Cascade of events during cholesteatoma development*