Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T08:11:59.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new species of Micarea (Pilocarpaceae) from Madeira growing on Usnea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2014

Pieter P. G. VAN DEN BOOM
Affiliation:
Arafura 16, NL-5691 JA Son, The Netherlands. Email: pvdboom@kpnmail.nl
Damien ERTZ
Affiliation:
National Botanic Garden, Domaine de Bouchout, B-1860 Meise, Belgium
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The new species Micarea usneae is described from Madeira. It has been found at two localities where it grew on epiphytic Usnea thalli. Micarea usneae is distinguished by a very thin pale brownish thallus, pallid to greyish black or bluish subglobose apothecia of 0·1–0·3 mm diameter, very narrow (1·5–2·5 µm) ascospores, black pycnidia and strongly curved to sigmoid macroconidia. Phylogenetic analyses using mtSSU sequences place the new species in the Micarea peliocarpa group. Catillaria usneicola and Cladonia parasitica are recorded for the first time from Madeira. A key to the lichenicolous species on Usnea in Macaronesia is provided.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2014 

Introduction

As a result of studies on lichens and lichenicolous fungi on the island of Madeira by the first author, several lichenicolous fungi on Usnea were collected, including the common and widespread Biatoropsis usnearum Räsänen and Lichenostigma maureri Hafellner. In two localities on the western part of the island, an unknown lichenicolous lichen was also found on a few Usnea thalli. It belongs to the genus Micarea and is most closely related to M. peliocarpa (Anzi) Coppins & R. Sant. The aim of the present paper is to describe this species and provide a review of lichenicolous species on Usnea in Macaronesia. Two further species growing near the type are recorded for the first time from Madeira: Catillaria usneicola Etayo, growing on Usnea articulata (L.) Hoffm., and Cladonia parasitica (Hoffm.) Hoffm., growing epiphytically.

Material and Methods

Hand-cut sections were investigated microscopically in water and 5% KOH. Microscopical measurements all refer to material examined in water. Chemical reactions were tested using 10–15% KOH (K) and Lugol's reagent without (I) or with (K/I) pretreatment with K. Microcrystallization, used to identify gyrophoric acid, follows Orange et al. (Reference Orange, James and White2001: 42). This method was required because of the very thin thallus and very small apothecia.

The method of direct PCR as explained in Lawrey et al. (Reference Lawrey, Binder, Diederich, Molina, Sikaroodi and Ertz2007: 780) was performed on thin apothecial slices of the new Micarea (van den Boom 48057), using the primers mrSSU1 and mrSSU3R (Zoller et al. Reference Zoller, Scheidegger and Sperisen1999) for the amplification and sequencing of mtSSU. Amplicons were sequenced by Macrogen®. Sequence fragments were assembled with Sequencher version 4.9 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan) to obtain a consensus sequence of 714 nucleotides.

We included our sequence (GenBank accession number KF569511) in the alignment of Andersen & Ekman (Reference Andersen and Ekman2005) retrieved from the TreeBASE website (http://treebase.org/treebase-web/home.html) [S1258; the name ‘Micarea prasina’ was changed to ‘Micarea micrococca’ to agree with the published trees of Andersen & Ekman (Reference Andersen and Ekman2005)] to determine which group of Micarea species our new species belongs to. The sequence was aligned manually using MacClade 4.05 (Maddison & Maddison Reference Maddison and Maddison2002). Ambiguous regions representing a total of 62 bp were delimited on the alignment and excluded from the analyses. The final data set consisted of 82 taxa and 827 unambiguously aligned sites.

A Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis was performed on the mtSSU data set using GARLI (Zwickl Reference Zwickl2006, v.0.951 for OSX) with default settings. Physcia adscendens was chosen as the outgroup. A single most likely tree was produced (−lnL=13919·25867) (Fig. 1). The phylogenetic tree was visualized using FigTree v1.3.1 (Rambaut Reference Rambaut2012). Five hundred bootstrap pseudoreplicates were used to calculate a majority-rule consensus tree in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford Reference Swofford2002) to assess the Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values (ML-bs). ML-bs ≥70% were considered to be significant and added to the tree (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships among 82 taxa based on mtSSU sequences that resulted from a Maximum Likelihood analysis. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values≥70 are shown above internal branches. The new species, Micarea usneae, is in bold followed by the collecting number.

Comparative material examined. Micarea denigrata (lichenicolous): The Netherlands: Noord-Brabant: Stiphout, churchyard, vertical on a gravestone, on Physcia dubia, 2012, P. & B. van den Boom 48161 (hb. van den Boom).

Micarea coppinsii: Madeira: N of Funchal, E of Poiso, along road (ER 202) to Santo da Serra, (halfway), near João do Prado, edge of Pinus forest, open area with low (basalt) outcrops, 1240 m, 2012, P. & B. van den Boom 47615 (hb. van den Boom).

Micarea alabastrites: Madeira: NE of Funchal, W of Portela, trail to the west, along levada, in laurisilva area with mature Acer and Cryptomeria trees along the trail, 665 m, 2012, P. & B. van den Boom 47682 (hb. van den Boom).

Results

Phylogenetic analysis

Our phylogenetic tree is congruent with the well-supported lineages in Andersen & Ekman (Reference Andersen and Ekman2005) (Fig. 1). Our sequence of Micarea usneae is resolved in a strongly-supported clade (ML-bs=99) with Micarea peliocarpa, M. coppinsii Tønsberg, M. alabastrites (Nyl.) Coppins, M. leprosula (Th. Fr.) Coppins & A. Fletcher and M. cinerea (Schaer.) Hedl. Our new taxon fits well in this group of species characterized by pallid or bluish apothecia, mostly 3-septate ascospores and the presence of gyrophoric acid. Their pycnidia are either large and immersed, or small and sessile, with both micro- and macroconidia (Andersen & Ekman Reference Andersen and Ekman2005).

Taxonomy

Micarea usneae van den Boom & Ertz sp. nov.

MycoBank No.: MB805217

Lichenicolous lichen on thallus of Usnea sp. Thallus±effuse, very thin, pale brownish to pale greenish grey, up to 2 mm wide; apothecia immarginate, dull brownish to bluish; ascospores slightly clavate, straight to curved, 0–3-septate, (10–)12–18×1·5–2·5 µm; macropycnidia abundantly present, dark brown to black, immersed to sessile, 40–70 µm diam., K+ greenish, ostiole up to 30 µm wide with a small white blob, macroconidia 15–30×1·0–1·8 µm, 0–1(–3)-septate, curved to sigmoid. Thallus and apothecia with gyrophoric acid.

Type: Portugal, Madeira, road from Paul da Serra to Ribeira da Janela, W of Fanal, open area with Laurus and Erica trees, 32°49·1′N, 17°09·35′W, 1100 m, 2 May 2012, P. & B. van den Boom 48057 (BR—holotype; hb. van den Boom—isotype).

(Fig. 2)

Fig. 2. Micarea usneae (holotype) on Usnea, habitus. Scale=1 mm.

Thallus, ±effuse, very thin, not evanescent, up to 20 µm thick, smooth up to 2 mm wide, coalescing and forming a contiguous crust, or scattered patches, not forming goniocysts or areoles, greenish grey to brownish grey to pale brown, matt to weakly shiny, mostly thinly coated by gelatinous algae. Photobiont micareoid, algal cells globose, 4–8 µm diam.

Apothecia white, cream, pale dull brown, to greyish black, or bluish, sometimes piebald, 0·1–0·3 mm diam., immarginate, slightly to strongly convex, or hemispherical, scattered, sometimes tuberculate and 0·35 mm wide. Hymenium hyaline, (25–)30–40 µm; hamathecium of abundantly branched paraphyses c. 1 µm wide, septate, tips not or sometimes slightly widened and 1·5 µm wide, not pigmented; epithecium greenish, K−, N+ reddish; hypothecium hyaline. Asci with a strongly amyloid apical dome, sometimes an apical cushion is visible, slightly clavate, 20–27×10–14 µm, 8-spored; ascospores slightly clavate, straight to curved 0–3-septate, (10–)12–18×1·5–2·5 µm.

Macropycnidia abundantly present, dark brown to black, immersed to slightly sessile, 40–70 µm diam., in section pale brownish to greenish, K− ostiole up to 30 µm wide with a small white blob; macroconidia 15–30×1·0–1·8 µm, 0–1(–3)-septate, strongly curved to sigmoid.

Chemistry

Thallus and apothecia K−, C+ red, KC−, P−; gyrophoric acid (detected by microcrystal test).

Habitat and distribution

Micarea usneae is known from only two localities, in the NW part of Madeira, in a rather open forest with smaller to mature Laurus trees and Erica trees and shrubs. It occurred on an unidentified Usnea species, with a pendulous thallus without isidia, papillae or pseudocyphellae, but with fibrils and poorly developed soralia that could be referable to Usnea geissleriana P. Clerc. In the type locality, the Usnea sp. was growing on a small Erica tree, in a rather disturbed roadside spot, not rich in epiphytic lichen communities. Several Usnea species were found and a few well-developed macrolichens such as Cladonia parasitica, C. ramulosa (With.) J. R. Laundon, Hypotrachyna taylorensis (M. E. Mitch.) Hale, H. rockii (Zahlbr.) Hale and Parmeliella parvula P. M. Jørg., as well as a few microlichens such as Bacidia laurocerasi (Delise ex Duby) Zahlbr., Lecidea sp., Pertusaria sp. and Pyrenula dermatodes (Borrer) Schaer.

Notes

Micarea usneae is characterized by the lichenicolous habit, the very thin filmy pale brownish thallus, the brownish to bluish subglobose apothecia 0·1–0·3 mm diam., black pycnidia and strongly curved to sigmoid macroconidia 15–30×1·0–1·8 µm, 0–1(–3)-septate.

Although the first author has collected Micarea material all over Madeira and on all the Canary Islands, with special attention paid to that genus, the new species was collected only twice. Many Usnea specimens were also collected, especially when bearing lichenicolous fungi. When sterile, Micarea usneae must be very inconspicuous and although we have checked many Usnea specimens from Madeira, we failed to find further collections that could refer to M. usneae.

Species of Micarea sometimes grow over other lichens. Micarea peliocarpa is usually corticolous but when saxicolous it might grow over Aspicilia, Neofuscelia etc. (e.g. Diederich & Sérusiaux Reference Diederich and Sérusiaux2000), and we have seen Micarea denigrata (Fr.) Hedl. clearly growing on saxicolous Physcia dubia. Micarea inquinans (Tul.) Coppins is lichenicolous on Dibaeis baeomyces but has simple ascospores and no chemical compounds. Future studies should check if the new species is host-specific or if it might also grow over other lichens and other substrata.

Comparison with other species

The new species is easily mistaken in the field for Micarea peliocarpa, a species that also occurs on Madeira. This latter species usually has a much more granular thallus, with granules up to 0·2 mm diam.; ascomata can be as dark as in the new species, but asci are longer (25–55 µm), ascospores are wider (2·3–)3·0–4·0(–5·5) µm and not or rarely slightly constricted at septum, macropycnidia are mostly whitish, to pale greenish up to 0·2 mm wide and usually immersed, with gaping ostioles and the macroconidia are 21–40×1·0–1·5 µm, 1–5-septate (Coppins Reference Coppins, Smith, Aptroot, Coppins, Fletcher, Gilbert, James and Wolseley2009). Micarea alabastrites is also similar to M. usneae in having a thin and smooth thallus, but apothecia are whitish, cream- or ivory- white, ascospores (16–)18–26(–29) µm and macroconidia 21–55 µm long (Coppins Reference Coppins1983).

In the phylogenetic tree, Micarea coppinsii Tønsberg, which is also known from Madeira, is a closely related species. It has 3-septate ascospores 20–28×4(–5) µm, only microconidia are known and it is sorediate (Coppins Reference Coppins, Smith, Aptroot, Coppins, Fletcher, Gilbert, James and Wolseley2009). A recent Madeira collection of this latter species (P. & B. van den Boom 47615) is fertile and grew on a mature Pinus trunk.

Micarea synotheoides (Nyl.) Coppins also occurs on Madeira and resembles the new species in habitus, but differs in having longer ascospores with more septa, a K+ purple epihymenium, a different chemistry (no compounds) and macroconidia are unknown. This species also belongs to a different lineage in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1).

Subsequent to the monograph of Micarea in Europe (Coppins Reference Coppins1983), many new species of Micarea have been described from the Northern Hemisphere, but only two further species have 3-septate ascospores. Micarea subcinerea Brand & van den Boom has macroconidia that are nearly straight and 65–100×1·2–1·7 µm, much longer than in the new species (van den Boom & Brand Reference van den Boom and Brand2004); whereas Micarea neostipitata Coppins & May, which is known from conifers in North America, has similar 3-septate ascospores 17–25×1·7–2·5 µm, but has pale stalked pycnidia and conidia 5·5–6·7×1·8–3·0 µm (Coppins & May Reference Coppins and May2001).

In the Southern Hemisphere, other Micarea species with 3-septate ascospores have been described. Neither M. austroternaria Coppins & Kantvilas [a synonym of M. magellanica (Müll. Arg.) Fryday] or M. isabellina Coppins & Kantvilas contain gyrophoric acid and they either have small conidia or conidia are unknown and are mainly terricolous, not lichenicolous. Micarea flagellispora Coppins & Kantvilas also has 3-septate ascospores but they are much longer, 60–85×1·5–1·7 µm (Coppins & Kantvilas Reference Coppins and Kantvilas1990). Micarea pannarica Fryday has 3-septate ascospores c. 17·5×5·7 µm (much wider than the new species), the chemistry is different (pannarin) and it is terricolous (Fryday Reference Fryday2004).

In a recent study by the first author and co-workers on the genus Micarea on the island of Réunion in the Indian Ocean (Brand et al. Reference Brand, van den Boom and Sérusiaux2014), several new species were detected. One of them, Micarea borbonica Brand et al., is corticolous and related to M. peliocarpa but differs from the new species by a granular thallus, apothecia up to 0·5 mm, ascospores 15–27×3·0–4·1 µm and macroconidia 30–42×1·0–1·3 µm that are indistinctly 3-septate.

Several lichenicolous fungi growing on Usnea are known from Macaronesia, and it is possible to mistake these species for Micarea usneae. The heterobasidiomycete Biatoropsis usnearum, which is common on the island and with which the new species sometimes grows, has biatorine basidiomata that can have the same colour as the new species, but they are often much larger, up to 2·5 mm diam, and have neither asci nor ascospores. Some species with apothecia are also similar in habitus. Abrothallus usneae is known from Madeira (Hafellner Reference Hafellner1995) and has dark brown-black apothecia 0·3–0·7 mm diam., but 1-septate ascospores of 14–18×5–7 µm. In the two localities where M. usneae occurs, we have found Catillaria usneicola on a different Usnea species: U. articulata. It has very small black apothecia and is easily mistaken for M. usneae. The apothecia have a paler disc, so it resembles the pycnidia of M. usneae, although these have a small white blob at their apex. It also differs in that it has no thallus, the ascospores are 4·5–6·0×1·5–2·0 µm, and pycnidia are black and c. 30 µm. It is reported from Gomera in the original description (Etayo Reference Etayo2000) and from El Hierro (van den Boom & Ertz Reference van den Boom and Ertz2012), and is here newly reported for Madeira. Lichenostigma maureri is also known from Madeira (Hafellner Reference Hafellner1995). It has small black apothecia c. 0·1 mm diam., but has brown, 1-septate ascospores and is not confusable with the new species. In addition, the following coelomycetes that are known from the Canary Islands have conidiomata that can easily be mistaken for those of M. usneae: Pseudoseptoria usneae (Vouaux) D. Hawksw. has pycnidia 0·1–0·2 mm diam. and conidia 10–16×3–4 µm; Lichenoconium usneae (Anzi) D. Hawksw. has pycnidia of <0·1 mm and brown conidia 2–5 µm diam.; and Phaeosporobolus usneae D. Hawksw. & Hafellner has black conidiomata 50–75 µm diam., and brown conidia, 4–6 µm diam.

Additional specimen examined. Madeira: W side of island, road (ER209) from Paul da Serra to Ribeira da Janela, NW of Fanal, trail to the east, open area with Laurus trees and mature Erica among ferns, on Erica, 1080 m, 2012, P. & B. van den Boom 47988 (hb. van den Boom).

Key to the lichenicolous fungi and lichens growing on Usnea in Macaronesia

A=Azores, C=Canary Islands, M=Madeira

  1. 1 Apothecia present ... 2

    Apothecia lacking ... 5

  2. 2(1) Ascospores simple (C, M) ... Catillaria usneicola

    Ascospores 1–3-septate ... 3

  3. 3(2) Ascospores hyaline, 3-septate (M) ... Micarea usneae

    Ascospores brown, 1-septate ... 4

  4. 4(3) Ascospores 14–18×5–7 µm (C, M) ... Abrothallus usneae

    Ascospores 8–10×3–4 µm (A) ... Abrothallus chrysanthus

  5. 5(1) Bacidiomata present (C, M) ... Biatoropsis usnearum

    Ascomata or pycnidia present, or conidia present without pycnidia ... 6

  6. 6(5) Ascomata present, superficial, black, up to 0·1 mm, ascospores 1-septate (C, M) ... Lichenostigma maureri

    Ascomata lacking ... 7

  7. 7(6) Pycnidia unknown (Deuteromycete), conidiomata 50–75 µm diam., conidia brown, 4–6 µm diam. (C) ... Phaeosporobolus usneae

    Pycnidia present ... 8

  8. 8(7) Pycnidia 0·1–0·2 mm, conidia hyaline, 10–16×3–4 µm (C) ... Pseudoseptoria usneae

    Pycnidia 50–75 µm, conidia brown, 2–5 µm diam. (C) ... Lichenoconium usneae

Other species reported as new to Madeira

Catillaria usneicola Etayo

Madeira, road (ER209) from Paul da Serra to Ribeira da Janela, NW of Fanal, trail to the east, open area with Laurus trees and mature Erica among ferns, on Erica, 1080 m, 2012, P. & B. van den Boom 47981 (hb. van den Boom).

Cladonia parasitica (Hoffm.) Hoffm.

Madeira, road (ER209) from Paul da Serra to Ribeira da Janela, W of Fanal, W side of the road, open area with Laurus trees and Erica shrubs among ferns, on Erica, 1100 m, 2012, P. & B. van den Boom 48060 (hb. van den Boom).

We are greatly honoured to publish this work in the special issue of The Lichenologist for the 65th birthday of our most distinguished colleague and friend, Dr Brian J. Coppins.

We would like to thank Didier Masson for the identification of Hypotrachyna material mentioned in this paper. Bern van den Boom is also thanked for supporting the fieldwork on Madeira.

References

Andersen, H. L. & Ekman, S. (2005) Disintegration of the Micareaceae (lichenized Ascomycota): a molecular phylogeny based on mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Mycological Research 109: 2130.Google Scholar
Brand, A. M., van den Boom, P. P. G. & Sérusiaux, E. (2014) Unveiling a surprising diversity in the lichen genus Micarea (Pilocarpaceae) in Réunion (Mascarenes archipelago, Indian Ocean). Lichenologist 46: 413439.Google Scholar
Coppins, B. J. (1983) A taxonomic study of the lichen genus Micarea in Europe. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Botany Series 11(2): 17214.Google Scholar
Coppins, B. J. (2009) Micarea. In The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. (Smith, C. W., Aptroot, A., Coppins, B. J., Fletcher, A., Gilbert, O. L., James, P. W. & Wolseley, P. A., eds): 583606. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Coppins, B. J. & Kantvilas, G. (1990) Studies on Micarea in Australasia I. Four new species from Tasmania. Lichenologist 22: 277288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppins, B. J. & May, P. F. (2001) Micarea neostipitata, a new species with pale stipitate pycnidia from eastern North America. Lichenologist 33: 487490.Google Scholar
Diederich, P. & Sérusiaux, E. (2000) The Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi of Belgium and Luxembourg. An Annotated Checklist. Luxembourg: Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
Etayo, J. (2000) Aportación a la flora liquénica de las Islas Canarias. VI. Hongos liquenícolas de La Palma. Bulletin de la Société linnéenne de Provence 51: 153162.Google Scholar
Fryday, A. M. (2004) New species and records of lichenized fungi from Campbell Island and the Auckland Islands, New Zealand. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 88: 127146.Google Scholar
Hafellner, J. (1995) A new checklist of lichens and lichenicolous fungi of insular Laurimacaronesia including a lichenological bibliography for the area. Fritschiana 5: 1132.Google Scholar
Lawrey, J. D., Binder, M., Diederich, P., Molina, M. C., Sikaroodi, M. & Ertz, D. (2007) Phylogenetic diversity of lichen-associated homobasidiomycetes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 778789.Google Scholar
Maddison, D. & Maddison, W. (2002) MacClade version 4.03PPC: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Orange, A., James, P. W. & White, F. J. (2001) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A. (2012) FigTree v1.3.1. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
van den Boom, P. & Brand, A. M. (2004) Micarea subcinerea, an additional species of the lichen flora from Western Europe. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde 13: 125129.Google Scholar
van den Boom, P. P. G. & Ertz, D. (2012) Lichens and lichenicolous fungi from El Hierro (Canary Islands), a survey, including five new species. Cryptogamie, Mycologie 33: 5997.Google Scholar
Zoller, S., Scheidegger, C. & Sperisen, C. (1999) PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming ascomycetes. Lichenologist 31: 511516.Google Scholar
Zwickl, D. J. (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph. D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships among 82 taxa based on mtSSU sequences that resulted from a Maximum Likelihood analysis. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values≥70 are shown above internal branches. The new species, Micarea usneae, is in bold followed by the collecting number.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Micareausneae (holotype) on Usnea, habitus. Scale=1 mm.