Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T23:52:15.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Age and growth of the little Indian squid, Loliolus hardwickei (Gray, 1849) in the Arabian Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2019

Kurichithara Kunjumony Sajikumar*
Affiliation:
Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, PO Box 1603, Kochi-682018, Kerala, India
Geetha Sasikumar
Affiliation:
Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, PO Box 1603, Kochi-682018, Kerala, India
Gishnu Mohan
Affiliation:
Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, PO Box 1603, Kochi-682018, Kerala, India
Vasant Kripa
Affiliation:
Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, PO Box 1603, Kochi-682018, Kerala, India
Puthenpurackal Simon Alloycious
Affiliation:
Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, PO Box 1603, Kochi-682018, Kerala, India
Kolliyil Sunil Mohamed
Affiliation:
Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, PO Box 1603, Kochi-682018, Kerala, India
*
Author for correspondence: Kurichithara Kunjumony Sajikumar, E-mail: kksajikumar@yahoo.co.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Age and growth of the little Indian squid Loliolus hardwickei (Gray, 1849) were studied using samples collected in the coastal waters of Arabian Sea. Statolith increment counts demonstrated that L. hardwickei has a fast growth rate (dorsal mantle length: 0.31–0.73 mm day−1 in females and 0.27–0.56 mm day−1 in males) and a short lifespan of less than 6 months. Females are the larger sex and their daily growth rates were higher than in males. The oldest male and female were 110 and 130 days old; the youngest mature female and male were 62 and 52 days old respectively. The oviducal fecundity ranged from 104–480 eggs, mean = 360 eggs (14–23 eggs g−1 body weight).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2019 

Introduction

The Arabian Sea is one of the most productive maritime regions of the world (Ryther & Menzel, Reference Ryther and Menzel1965). It is a tropical basin subjected to important seasonal climatic variations due to the reversing monsoon and seasonal upwelling (Nair et al., Reference Nair, Madhupratap, Gopalakrishnan, Haridas and Gauns1999; Pillai et al., Reference Pillai, Pillai, Gopinathan and Nandakumar2000); e.g. inshore mean monthly sea bottom temperature (SBT) varying from 21.5°C to 32.0°C (Krishnakumar & Bhat, Reference Krishnakumar and Bhat2008).

Loliginid squids are important inshore commercial resources of the Arabian Sea (Meiyappan & Mohamed, Reference Meiyappan, Mohamed, Joseph and Jayaprakash2003). Representatives of the family have short lifespans, high growth rates and early maturity (Jackson, Reference Jackson1990a; Jackson et al., Reference Jackson, Forsythe, Hixon and Hanlon1997, Reference Jackson, Bustamante, Cherel, Fulton, Grist, Jackson, Nichols, Pethybridge, Phillips, Ward and Xavier2007; Hatfield, Reference Hatfield2000; Jackson & Moltschaniwskyj, Reference Jackson and Moltschaniwskyj2001, Reference Jackson and Moltschaniwskyj2002; Moreno et al., Reference Moreno, Azevedo, Pereira and Pierce2007; Ceriola & Jackson, Reference Ceriola and Jackson2010).

The little Indian squid Loliolus hardwickei (Gray, 1849) is one of the least studied loliginid squids of Indian waters. It is distributed throughout the northern Persian Gulf, India, Myanmarese coasts and throughout Indonesia (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Roper and Tait1985). It is a dwarf species attaining a maximum dorsal mantle length (DML) of 88 mm, body weight of 20 g and inhabits estuarine and shallow coastal waters with depths <30 m (Jereb & Roper, Reference Jereb and Roper2006, Reference Jereb and Roper2010). Very little information is available on the biology of L. hardwickei (Jereb & Roper, Reference Jereb and Roper2010). Our study presents the first published data on the length-weight relationships, age, growth rates and maturity of this species in the coastal waters of the Arabian Sea.

Materials and methods

Sampling

A total of 122 squids, 49 males and 73 females were collected in the south-eastern Arabian Sea during the study. This included 33 squids caught by the research vessel ‘F.V. Silver Pampano’ on 16 May 2014, off Kochi (09°58′N 76°06′E; 42 m trawl net, codend mesh size 25 mm) at 20 m depth. Additional specimens were purchased from commercial trawlers (30 m trawl net, codend mesh size 25 mm) operating from Cochin Fisheries Harbour (CFH), Kerala, India. A total of 42 individuals were acquired on 21 October 2014, and 47 individuals on 17 January 2015. Immediately after collection, squids were congealed with ice and transported to the laboratory.

Monthly sea surface temperature (SST) and sea bottom temperature (SBT) at 10, 20 and 30 m depth were recorded from January 2014 to January 2015 as part of regular oceanographic monitoring of fishing grounds off Kochi using a reversing mercury thermometer attached to the water sampler (Nansen reversing bottle).

In the laboratory, DML was measured to the nearest millimetre and wet body weight (BW) to the nearest 0.1 g. Maturity stages were assigned according to Lipinski & Underhill (Reference Lipiński and Underhill1995), which included Stage I and II (immature), III (maturing), IV (mature) and V (spent).

Statoliths (N = 119) were extracted and processed according to Arkhipkin & Shcherbich (Reference Arkhipkin and Shcherbich2012) methodology. The total statolith length (TSL) was measured using a microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i), within 1 µm.

The statolith index (SI) was calculated as, SI = TSL/DML × 100

Statoliths were mounted on a microscope slide using thermoplastic cement adhesive (Crystalbond 509™), keeping the anterior portion on top. Growth rings were visible without grinding, however, for better visualization, one-stroke polishing was done using a 1500 grit fine lapping film. Growth increments were examined under a microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i) with 600× magnification and counted from the first check (hatching ring) to the edge of the dorsal dome, where increments were most clearly visible (Dawe et al., Reference Dawe, O'Dor, O'Dense and Hurley1985; Villanueva, Reference Villanueva1992). In some cases, it was necessary to extrapolate counts from adjacent areas to estimate increment numbers in unclear areas. Counts by three independent readers were then averaged.

Growth increments were assumed to be daily, based on the validation of growth increments of L. noctiluca described by Jackson (Reference Jackson1990b) as well as recent and past research supporting the one day-one increment hypothesis in loliginid squids (e.g. Jackson, Reference Jackson2004). Hatching date was back-calculated from the dates of capture. The mean daily growth rates (DGR) were calculated as:

$${\rm DGR} = \displaystyle{{({\rm DML}\hbox{-\!-\!-}1.3)} \over A}$$

where A is age in days, and 1.3 is hatchling size, mm DML (Jackson, Reference Jackson1990b; Dimmlich & Hoedt, Reference Dimmlich and Hoedt1998).

The numbers of ripe eggs in the oviduct (oviducal fecundity, OF) were counted and egg measurements were taken in 39 adult females (38–53 mm DML) with a Nikon stereozoom microscope (Nikon-SMZ-25). The relative batch fecundity, RF was estimated as:

$${\rm RF} = {\rm OF}/{\rm BW}$$

An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to test for significant differences in ‘b’ values for males, females and for the population following the method of Snedecor & Cochran (Reference Snedecor and Cochran1967).

Results

Water temperature

During the period of observation, the SST peaked twice: first in April/May (pre-monsoon; 31–31.6°C) and then in October/November (post-monsoon; 29.5–31.0°C). The lowest SST was 27.2–27.8°C in June/July (monsoon). The SBT also first peaked in April/May (29.3–30.0°C) with a second peak in November/December (28.5–28.9°C). The lowest SBT was 23.9–25.4°C in June–August.

Length-weight relationship

The squid size ranged from 19–57 mm DML in females (0.7–17.2 g BW) and from 20–41 mm DML in males (0.7–7.9 g BW). The relationship between DML and BW was described by the equation:

$${\rm BW} = 0.1846 \, {\rm DML}^{2.765} \, (r^2 = 0.853){\rm} \, {\rm in}\, {\rm males}.$$
$${\rm BW} = \,0.1454 \, {\rm DML}^{2.965} \, (r^2 = 0.929){\rm} \, {\rm in}{\rm}\, {\rm females}.$$

The ANCOVA showed no significant differences in these relations (P = 0.564) between sexes. Therefore, the length-weight relationship for pooled sexes was:

$${\rm BW} = 0.1674\, {\rm DML}^{2.774} \, (r^2 = 0.909).$$

Statolith shape and growth

The L. hardwickei statoliths were flat antero-posteriorly and had a broad wing. The lateral dome was well developed, and the rostrum was short (Figure 1A, B). The TSL increased with an increase in DML (r 2 = 0.68)/span (Figure 2A). The SI ranged from 1.5–2.32% of DML and showed negative allometric growth (r 2 = 0.75, a = 13.87, b = −0.544) (Figure 2B).

Fig. 1. (A) Anterio-lateral sections of the statoliths of L. hardwickei, R, Rostrum; W, wing; LD, Lateral dome; DD, Dorsal dome. (B) Ground statolith showing growth increments, N, Nucleus. Scale bar: A, 100 µm; B, 50 µm.

Fig. 2. (A) Relationship between dorsal mantle length and statolith length. (B) relationship between dorsal mantle length and statolith index.

Age and growth

The age of sampled squid ranged from 50–130 days in females and from 56–110 days in males. The daily growth rate was 0.31–0.73 mm, mean = 0.52 mm DML day−1 in females and 0.27–0.56 mm, mean = 0.43 mm DML day−1 in males. The studied squids hatched in March, June, July, August, October and November. Higher growth rates were observed for male and female squid hatched in October and November, while lower rates were estimated for squid hatched in June to July (Figure 3).

Fig. 3. Estimated monthly growth rate (MGR) of mantle length based on the hatching months of L. hardwickei from the coastal south-eastern Arabian Sea. MMGR, Male monthly growth rate and FMGR, Female monthly growth rate.

Maturation and fecundity

The youngest mature female was 62 days old, and the youngest mature male was 52 days old. Both sexes older than 90 days were mature. The OF ranged from 104–480 eggs (mean = 360). The RF was 14–23 egg g−1 BW. The size of mature eggs in all months was 1.3–1.6 mm (mean 1.5 mm).

Discussion

The analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the length-weight relationship between males and females. This is surprising, as usually, male and female loliginid squids have different length-weight relations due to sexual dimorphism and different maturation rates and females developing larger reproductive systems (e.g. Jereb et al., Reference Jereb, Allcock, Lefkaditou, Piatkowski, Hastie and Pierce2015). In general, length-weight relationships can vary, depending on the season, size range of the population, or annual changes in environmental conditions (Froese, Reference Froese2006). In our case, absence of such differences could be caused by mixing of the different monthly cohorts maturing at different sizes.

The statolith shape and increment pattern were like those of L. noctiluca (Jackson, Reference Jackson1990b) and Lolliguncula brevis (Jackson et al., Reference Jackson, Forsythe, Hixon and Hanlon1997), both of which are small-sized species with a short lifespan. Negative allometric growth in statoliths (TSL vs DML) seems to be a characteristic of all squids (Arkhipkin, Reference Arkhipkin1989; Bettencourt et al., Reference Bettencourt, Coelho, Andrade and Guerra1996).

The maximum age estimated in this study was 130 days for a 57 mm DML mature female and 110 days for a spent male (DML = 45 mm) indicating a probable lifespan of less than 6 months for L. hardwickei, similar to that observed in another loliolus squid, L. noctiluca from tropical Australian waters (Jackson, Reference Jackson1991). Earlier studies on age and growth of various populations of L. noctiluca from Australian waters showed that age ranged between 92 days and 121 days for females and between 84 days and 122 days for males (Ceriola & Jackson, Reference Ceriola and Jackson2010), which is similar to our observations.

Dwarf loliginids exhibit different growth rates at different latitudes and seasons (Dimmilich & Hoedt, Reference Dimmlich and Hoedt1998; Jackson & Moltschaniwskyj, Reference Jackson and Moltschaniwskyj2001; Ceriola & Jackson, Reference Ceriola and Jackson2010) which is supported by the results obtained in the present study. The slower growth rate of the individuals born during the monsoon may be due to the poor growth in colder upwelling water as temperature plays a key role in the growth rate of cephalopods (Forsythe & Heukelem, Reference Forsythe, Van Heukelem and Boyle1987).

All previous studies on age and growth in tropical loliginid squids were carried out in Australian waters (Jackson, Reference Jackson1990a; Reference Jackson1990b; Jackson & Choat, Reference Jackson and Choat1992; Jackson & Moltschaniwskyj, Reference Jackson and Moltschaniwskyj2001), North Africa (Arkhipkin & Nekludova, Reference Arkhipkin and Nekludova1993), the Gulf of Thailand (Chotiyaputta, Reference Chotiyaputta, Hancock, Smith, Grant and Beumer1997) or the Andaman Sea of Thailand (Sukramongkol et al., Reference Sukramongkol, Tsuchiya and Segawa2007). In all these studies, the estimated lifespan did not exceed 200 days (Jackson, Reference Jackson2004). The back-calculated hatch dates and presence of maturing and mature specimens in all sampling months in the present study supports the hypothesis that L. hardwickei breeds continuously. Such dwarf loliginid squids have a turnover of 2–4 generations within one year. It is evident that squids do not interrupt the spawning season to stop reproducing for 3–4 months as it is the entire life cycle of a single generation.

Females of L. hardwickei grow faster (Figure 3) and attain larger size than males, whereas the latter attain maturity earlier than females. Sexual dimorphism, where females are larger than males, is common among the genus Loliolus (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Roper and Tait1985). Advancing maturation of males is thought to be a characteristic for all cephalopods (Gonzalez et al., Reference González, Rasero and Guerra1994) and was also observed in other loliginid species (Arkhipkin, Reference Arkhipkin1995; Jackson et al., Reference Jackson, Forsythe, Hixon and Hanlon1997) and ommastrephids (Arkhipkin & Silvanovich, Reference Arkhipkin and Silvanovich1997; Markaida et al., Reference Markaida, Quiñónez-Velázquez and Sosa-Nishizaki2004; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Lin, Feng, Li and Su2017). Male maturation is not as energy-demanding as female maturation, and this could be a reason for the difference in age-at-maturity between males (52 days) and females (62 days). In cultured octopuses, Octopus digueti, O. vulgaris and Eledone cirrhosa females attain sexual maturity much later in their life cycle and grow to a larger size than males (DeRusha et al., Reference DeRusha, Forsythe and Hanlon1987; Boyle et al., Reference Boyle, Mangold and Ngoile1988; Domain et al., Reference Domain, Jouffre and Caverivière2000). Conversely, in many neritic loliginids, males have higher growth rates and grow to larger sizes (Jackson, Reference Jackson2004). Loliolus hardwickei seems to be an exception, and the reason could be the female maturation process and the associated multiple broods (Jackson & Moltschaniwskyj, Reference Jackson and Moltschaniwskyj2001) in a very short span of time.

Very little information is available on the biology of L. hardwickei, probably because the species is of little importance to commercial fisheries. This study provides pioneer information on the age and growth of this inshore squid in the tropical Arabian Sea, where loliginid growth is not studied at all.

Loliolus hardwickei is a very fast growing and short-lived species. Unlike larger loliginids but as in other dwarf species of the family, males were smaller than females at all ages. It demonstrates that populations ‘invest’ more into female growth, possibly to enhance reproductive output in a dwarf short-living species in which fecundity is restricted by both small body size and short lifespan.

Author ORCID

Kurichithara Kunjumony Sajikumar, 0000-0003-1106-3800

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr A. Gopalakrishnan, Director of ICAR-CMFRI for the facilities and the Captain and crew of ‘F.V. Silver Pompano’ for their support while at sea. We would also like to acknowledge P.U. Zacharia for providing squids from research cruises for the study. We thank Heather Ylitalo-Ward, University of Hawaii and Mattew Birk, University of South Florida, USA for their invaluable advice and suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript. We thank the reviewers for their careful and insightful review which has greatly improved the manuscript. This work is part of a PhD work in Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala, India.

Financial support

This work was funded by ICAR under the project ‘Development of Fishery Management Plans for Sustaining Marine Fisheries of Kerala and Lakshadweep’ (Project Code FISHCMFRISIL201200300003).

References

Arkhipkin, AI (1989) Age and growth of squids of the family Ommastrephidae (PhD thesis). Shirshov Institute of Oceanography, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
Arkhipkin, AI (1995) Age, growth and maturation of the European squid Loligo vulgaris (Myopsida, Loliginidae) on the west Saharan shelf. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 75, 593604.Google Scholar
Arkhipkin, AI and Nekludova, N (1993) Age and growth and maturation of the loliginid squids Alloteuthis africana and A. subulata on the West Africa Shelf. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 73, 949961.Google Scholar
Arkhipkin, AI and Silvanovich, NV (1997) Age, growth and maturation of the squid Martialia hyadesi (Cephalopoda, Ommastrephidae) in the south-west Atlantic. Antarctic Science 9, 373380.Google Scholar
Arkhipkin, AI and Shcherbich, ZN (2012) Thirty years’ progress in age determination of squid using statoliths. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 92, 13891398.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, V, Coelho, L, Andrade, JP and Guerra, A (1996) Age and growth of the squid Loligo vulgaris off the south coast of Portugal, using statolith analysis. Journal of Molluscan Studies 62, 359366.Google Scholar
Boyle, PR, Mangold, K and Ngoile, MAK (1988) Biological variation in Eledone cirrhosa (Cephalopoda: Octopoda): simultaneous comparison of North Sea and Mediterranean populations. Malacologia 29, 7787.Google Scholar
Ceriola, L and Jackson, GD (2010) Growth, hatch size and maturation in a southern population of the loliginid squid Loliolus noctiluca. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90, 755767.Google Scholar
Chotiyaputta, C (1997) Distribution, abundance, reproductive biology, age and growth of Loligo chinensis and Loligo duvauceli in the Western Gulf of Thailand. In Hancock, DA, Smith, DC, Grant, A and Beumer, JP (eds), Developing and Sustaining World Fisheries Resources: The State of Science and Management. Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 614619.Google Scholar
Dawe, EG, O'Dor, RK, O'Dense, PH and Hurley, GV (1985) Validation and application of an ageing technique for short-finned squid (Illex illecebrosus). Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 6, 107116.Google Scholar
DeRusha, RH, Forsythe, JW and Hanlon, RT (1987) Laboratory growth, reproduction and life span of the Pacific pygmy octopus, Octopus digueti. Pacific Science 41, 104121.Google Scholar
Dimmlich, WF and Hoedt, FE (1998) Age and growth of the myopsid squid Loliolus noctiluca in Western port, Victoria, determined from statolith microstructure analysis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 78, 577586.Google Scholar
Domain, F, Jouffre, D and Caverivière, A (2000) Growth of Octopus vulgaris from tagging in Senegalese waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80, 699706.Google Scholar
Forsythe, JW and Van Heukelem, WF (1987) Growth. In Boyle, PR (ed.), Cephalopod Life Cycles. London: Academic Press, pp. 135156.Google Scholar
Froese, R (2006) Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 22, 241253.Google Scholar
González, AF, Rasero, M and Guerra, A (1994) Preliminary study of Illex coindetii and Todaropsis eblanae (Cephalopoa: Ommastrephidae) in northern Spanish Atlantic waters. Fisheries Research 21, 115126.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E (2000) Do some like it hot? Temperature as a possible determinant of variability in the growth of the Patagonian squid, Loligo gahi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae). Fisheries Research 47, 2740.Google Scholar
Jackson, GD (1990 a) Age and growth of the tropical nearshore loliginid squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana determined from statolith growth-ring analysis. Fishery Bulletin 88, 113118.Google Scholar
Jackson, GD (1990 b) The use of tetracycline staining techniques to determine statolith growth ring periodicity in the tropical loliginid squids Loliolus noctiluca and Loligo chinensis. Veliger 33, 395399.Google Scholar
Jackson, GD (1991) Age, growth and population dynamics of tropical squid and sepioid populations in waters off Townsville, North Queensland, Australia (PhD thesis). James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Jackson, GD (2004) Advances in defining the life histories of myopsid squid. Marine Freshwater Research 55, 357365.Google Scholar
Jackson, GD and Choat, JH (1992) Growth in tropical cephalopods: an analysis based on statolith microstructure. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 49, 218228.Google Scholar
Jackson, GD and Moltschaniwskyj, NA (2001) Temporal variation in growth rates and reproductive parameters in the small near-shore tropical squid Loliolus noctiluca; is cooler better? Marine Ecology Progress Series 218, 167177.Google Scholar
Jackson, GD and Moltschaniwskyj, NA (2002) Spatial and temporal variation in growth rates and maturity in the Indo-Pacific squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae). Marine Biology 140, 747754.Google Scholar
Jackson, GD, Forsythe, JW, Hixon, RF and Hanlon, RT (1997) Age, growth, and maturation of Lolliguncula brevis (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in the northwest Gulf of Mexico with a comparison of length-frequency vs statolith age analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 54, 29072919.Google Scholar
Jackson, GD, Bustamante, P, Cherel, Y, Fulton, A, Grist, EPM, Jackson, CH, Nichols, PD, Pethybridge, H, Phillips, K, Ward, RD and Xavier, JC (2007) Applying new tools to cephalopod trophic dynamics and ecology: perspectives from the Southern Ocean Cephalopod Workshop, 2–3 February 2006. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17, 7999.Google Scholar
Jereb, P and Roper, CFE (2006) Cephalopods of the Indian Ocean. A review. Part I. Inshore squids (Loliginidae) collected during the International Indian Ocean Expedition. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 119, 91136.Google Scholar
Jereb, P and Roper, CFE (2010) FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. Vol. 2. Cephalopods of the World. An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Species Known to Date. FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes, No. 4. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Jereb, P, Allcock, AL, Lefkaditou, E, Piatkowski, U, Hastie, LC and Pierce, GJ (2015) Cephalopod biology and fisheries in Europe: II. Species accounts. ICES Cooperative Research Report, no. 325, 360 pp.Google Scholar
Krishnakumar, PK and Bhat, GS (2008) Seasonal and interannual variations of oceanographic conditions off Mangalore coast (Karnataka, India) in the Malabar upwelling system during 1995–2004 and their influences on the pelagic fishery. Fisheries Oceanography 17, 4560.Google Scholar
Lipiński, MR and Underhill, LG (1995) Sexual maturation in squid: quantum or continuum? South African Journal of Marine Science 15, 207223.Google Scholar
Liu, BL, Lin, J, Feng, C, Li, J and Su, H (2017) Estimation of age, growth and maturation of purpleback flying squid, Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis, in Bashi Channel, Central Pacific Ocean. Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research 16, 525531.Google Scholar
Lu, CC, Roper, CFE and Tait, RW (1985) A revision of Loliolus (Cephalopoda; Loliginidae), including L. noctiluca, a new species of squid from Australian waters. Proceedings of Royal Society of Victoria 97, 5985.Google Scholar
Markaida, U, Quiñónez-Velázquez, C and Sosa-Nishizaki, O (2004) Age, growth and maturation of jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Fisheries Research 66, 3147.Google Scholar
Meiyappan, MM and Mohamed, KS (2003) Cephalopods. In Joseph, MM and Jayaprakash, AA (eds), Status of Exploited Marine Fishery Resources of India. Cochin: CMFRI, pp. 221227.Google Scholar
Moreno, A, Azevedo, M, Pereira, J and Pierce, GJ (2007) Growth strategies in the squid Loligo vulgaris from Portuguese waters. Marine Biology Research 3, 4959.Google Scholar
Nair, KKC, Madhupratap, M, Gopalakrishnan, TC, Haridas, P and Gauns, M(1999) The Arabian Sea: physical environment, zooplankton and myctophid abundance. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences 28, 138145.Google Scholar
Pillai, VN, Pillai, VK, Gopinathan, CP and Nandakumar, A (2000) Seasonal variations in the physico-chemical and biological characteristics of the Eastern Arabian Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 42, 121.Google Scholar
Ryther, JH and Menzel, D (1965) On the production, composition, and distribution of organic matter in the Western Arabian Sea. Deep Sea Research 12, 199209.Google Scholar
Snedecor, GW and Cochran, WG (1967) Statistical Methods. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Sukramongkol, N, Tsuchiya, K and Segawa, S (2007) Age and maturation of Loligo duvauceli and L. chinensis from Andaman Sea of Thailand. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17, 237246.Google Scholar
Villanueva, R (1992) Interannual growth differences in the oceanic squid Todarodes angolensis Adam in the northern Benguela up-welling system, based on statolith growth increment analysis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 159, 157177.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (A) Anterio-lateral sections of the statoliths of L. hardwickei, R, Rostrum; W, wing; LD, Lateral dome; DD, Dorsal dome. (B) Ground statolith showing growth increments, N, Nucleus. Scale bar: A, 100 µm; B, 50 µm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) Relationship between dorsal mantle length and statolith length. (B) relationship between dorsal mantle length and statolith index.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Estimated monthly growth rate (MGR) of mantle length based on the hatching months of L. hardwickei from the coastal south-eastern Arabian Sea. MMGR, Male monthly growth rate and FMGR, Female monthly growth rate.