Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T03:39:55.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compound stress in Nigerian English

An empirical study of stress placement in compounds in educated Nigerian English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2011

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of all the levels of linguistic analysis, it is at the phonological level that differences in the dialects of a language are more easily noticed (Ogu, 1992: 82). The phonology of a language can be investigated at two sub-levels: segmental and suprasegmental. Investigating the segmental micro-level entails looking at phonemes – the vowels and the consonants. Suprasegmentals are linguistically significant elements that go beyond individual segments, and include syllable, tone, stress, rhythm and intonation.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Introduction

Of all the levels of linguistic analysis, it is at the phonological level that differences in the dialects of a language are more easily noticed (Ogu, Reference Ogu1992: 82). The phonology of a language can be investigated at two sub-levels: segmental and suprasegmental. Investigating the segmental micro-level entails looking at phonemes – the vowels and the consonants. Suprasegmentals are linguistically significant elements that go beyond individual segments, and include syllable, tone, stress, rhythm and intonation.

In English, stress – the degree of prominence given to a syllable – is very significant. It is phonemic, to some extent (Giegerich, Reference Giegerich1992: 180); it contrasts meanings, to some extent. For instance, a shift in stress in import from the initial syllable to the last syllable changes it from a noun to a verb. Stress plays important roles in rhythm and intonation. For this reason, English is referred to as a stress-timed language (Roach, Reference Roach1997), as opposed to most Nigerian indigenous languages which are syllable-timed.

The application of stress on each grammatical unit above the morpheme varies; word stress is different from phrasal stress and sentence stress. At the word level, grammatical words are unstressed. But at the sentence level, they may receive stress for emphatic purposes. Similarly, a syllable that receives a primary stress in other types of words may lose that stress when found in a compound. The only unifying factor for all stress types is that the stress, of whatever name, falls on a syllable.

Stress manifests differently in different dialects of English. Nigerian English (NE) shows some major differences in the way it marks stress from the way Standard British English (SBE), with Received Pronunciation (RP) as the standard for pronunciation, does. Among the grammatical units where stress is applied – word, phrase and sentence – it seems that in NE the word has received better attention than the rest. However, it is not all types of word that have been investigated fully (Jowitt, Reference Jowitt1991; Banjo, Reference Banjo1996); scholars have focused attention on simple words more than on compounds. This work, therefore, looks at compound stress in NE and attempts to describe the regular patterns used by educated NE speakers. There have been various attempts to classify NE by various scholars, using parameters such as spoken English (Brosnahan, Reference Brosnahan1958), written English (Adesanoye, Reference Adesanoye1973), closeness to world standards (Adekunle, Reference Adekunle and Ubahakwe1979: 36–9; Banjo, Reference Banjo1996). Jowitt (Reference Jowitt1991: 36–9) also identifies some varieties based on regions. Such varieties include Hausa English, Igbo English and Yoruba English.

The suprasegmentals of NE

Tiffen (Reference Tiffen1974), cited by Banjo (Reference Banjo, Bamgbose, Banjo and Thomas1995: 221), made the insightful comment that for Nigerians ‘suprasegmentals constituted the main problems, whilst the lexical and syntactic components least’ (cf. Akinjobi, Reference Akinjobi, Babatunde and Adeyanju2002: 41). Banjo (Reference Banjo and Ubahakwe1979) himself claimed that the suprasegmental aspect was the last hurdle which NE speakers find impossible to cross. The prosodic features of NE raise interesting issues that have engaged the attention of scholars. Some such issues are briefly summarised below. This is necessary so that the state of research on NE stress will be clearly seen in relation to RP (for which Daniel Jones' (Reference Jones2006) English Pronouncing Dictionary will be used as the standard).

Stress

The most striking feature of Nigerian pronunciation is its ‘delayed primary stress’ (Kujore, Reference Kujore1985). Simo Bobda (Reference Simo Bobda, Bamgbose, Banjo and Thomas1995: 255; Reference Simo Bobda2000) reports some of Kujore's findings (Reference Kujore1985: 2ff) thus:

  1. (a) The tendency for forward stress, e.g. col′league, pe′trol vs RP: ′colleague, ′petrol.

  2. (b) The recurrence of forward stress in compounds with final obstruents, e.g. fire′wood, proof′read vs RP: ′firewood, ′proofread. Jowitt (Reference Jowitt1991: 91) gives examples of hyphenated and open compounds which are given special stress marks: sitting-′room, grammar ′school vs RP: ′sitting-room, ′grammar school. He notes, however, that NE may have the same pattern as RP in the examples just given.

  3. (c) The self-stressing property of certain suffixes: -ate (v), -ise (v), -fy e.g: indi′cate, recog′nise, diversi′fy vs RP: ′indicate, ′recognise, di′versify.

  4. (d) The tendency of some suffixes to carry stress forward to the syllables preceding them: -able, -ible for example: indo′mitable, e′ligible vs RP: in′domitable, ′eligible.

  5. (f) The tendency of strong clusters to pull stress forward to the preceding syllable, e.g. an′cestor, ca′lendar vs RP: ′ancestor, ′calendar. Kujore notes, however, that there are some exceptions to the patterns given above, such as: ′success, ′extreme vs RP: suc′cess, ′extreme.

  6. (g) NE, according to Kujore, also reverses the order of primary stress and secondary stress in words such as ′education, ′federation vs RP: edu′cation, fede′ration. This claim is highly contestable, and may in fact be limited to a few NE speakers. What seems to generally apply is the avoidance of secondary stress; the primary stress still remains intact, such that we have edu′cation and fede′ration.

The findings on stress in NE above were not always backed up with field work. There is, therefore, a need to empirically determine the pattern of, particularly, compound stress in NE.

Metrical Phonology

Metrical Phonology was a reaction to, and an offshoot of, Generative Phonology pioneered by Liberman (Reference Liberman1975) and extended by Liberman and Prince (Reference Liberman and Prince1977). Metrical Phonology discarded the numbering of stress levels and indefinite lowering of syllables found in mainstream Generative Phonology. Instead, ‘stress is defined on a tree structure in which nodes divide (only binarily) into s(strong) and w(weak) branches’ (Cruttenden, Reference Cruttenden1986: 30). According to scholars like Halle and Idsardi (Reference Halle, Idsardi and Goldsmith1995: 439) stress can be reconceptualised as follows:

…stress in language is a reflection of the groupings that speakers impose on sequences of linguistic elements. Once these groupings have been established, greater prominence is supplied to certain elements in the group than to the others. The prominence is thus a by-product of the grouping of the elements into constituents.

In addition, stress is: culminative (content words contain at least one stressed syllable); hierarchical; delimitative in some languages where stressed and unstressed syllables alternate and where clashes (adjacent stresses) are avoided; and enhanced segmentally through vowel lengthening or by gemination (Goldsmith, Reference Goldsmith1990: 2; Kager, Reference Kager and Goldsmith1995: 367). Halle and Idsardi (Reference Halle, Idsardi and Goldsmith1995: 439) emphasised that units of prosody are not strictly layered hierarchically: rather ‘stress and syllable structure are represented on different planes’.

The metrical tree

Metrical trees show the hierarchical structure in the syllables of a word in a binary branching structure as strong-weak (sw) or weak-strong (ws). Stress is, thus, seen as a relational property; the relationship a node has with its sister node determines its status (Kager, Reference Kager and Goldsmith1995: 368). For a word, the prosodic hierarchy is as shown below, as per Napoli (Reference Napoli1996: 101):

Pw = Prosodic word

F = foot

σ = syllable

μ = mora

A prosodic word is the word at the rhythmic level. A foot is the next larger rhythmic unit after the syllable; it contains two syllables, one of which is strong and the other weak. A syllable is the smallest pronounceable unit of the word. A mora is the element in the rhyme of a syllable; if the nucleus has one element, it has only one mora; if the rhyme has two or more elements, it then has two moras (Napoli, Reference Napoli1996 : 81, 101). Let's now consider the metrical tree for the word artificial

Pw    [ ɑ: ti: fi ∫l ]

F (two feet)    [ ɑ: ti: fi ∫l ]

σ (four syllables) [ ɑ: ti: fi ∫l ]

μ (four moras) [ ɑ: ti: fi ∫l ]

For each of the levels of representation, the transcription of the word is given; it is the same for all levels. From this transcription, it could be seen that artificial is a prosodic word with two feet, four syllables and four moras. The metrical tree below presents this more graphically:

This shows that artificial is a prosodic word with two feet, four syllables and four moras.

The metrical grid

A metrical tree only shows the relative prominence of nodes; it does not show rhythmic alternation between strong and weak syllables; it also does not show ‘clash’ – a situation that happens when adjacent syllables are stressed (Kager, Reference Kager and Goldsmith1995: 369). A metrical grid caters for these. The rhythmic structure of artificial according to such a grid is shown below:

The lowest row of x represents the syllable level, the middle row shows the foot level, while the third and highest row represents the word level. In this word, the third syllable is more prominent than the first syllable; the second and the fourth syllables are the least prominent. The metrical grid shows that the height of the grid columns corresponds to the degree of prominence. This means that the topmost x is the most prominent syllable. The next prominent syllable will be found at the row of x below the topmost row; this is the second x after the most prominent syllable (Kager, Reference Kager and Goldsmith1995: 369).

Methods of data collection and analysis

The data were collected using a tape-recorder. Fifty subjects, equally divided by sex, were asked to read structures and passages that contain the compound features being investigated. In all, 25 males and 25 females were used. A British citizen, the Head of the British High Commission Office in Bodija, Ibadan, Nigeria, was used as control subject. In addition, casual conversations among NE speakers at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria, and a radio discussion programme among NE speakers were also recorded. This was done to see how the features being examined were used in casual conversations.

In analysing the data, tokens of occurrence of stress patterns were counted. Then, using simple percentages, the frequency of occurrence of each pattern was determined, to ascertain the regular patterns. Thereafter, using phrase markers, metrical trees and metrical grids, in line with the tenets of Metrical Phonology, the regular stress-marking patterns of compounds observable in NE were illustrated.

NE compound stress patterns

This section focuses on analysis and interpretation of the data. For each compound, the commonest pattern found in NE is indicated. This is then compared with the pattern of the native speaker used for this study.

Compound nouns

For compounds with two bases, house-fly, post office, all-star, mealtime, passbook, foul play, gold medallist, local government, national anthem, life history, love-letter and boyfriend were tested. All these words had the first base stressed by all the subjects. The only exceptions are post office and pass book. 11 males and 9 females stressed the second base of the former, while 6 males and 5 females stressed the second base of the latter. The native speaker used as the control subject assigned primary stress to the first base of each of the words.

Table 1 below presents the overall stress-marking patterns found in the speech of the subjects, for 2-base compound nouns.

Table 1: Stress-pattern of 2 base-compound nouns in NE

Key:

s - number of subjects

n - number of tokens per speaker

t - total tokens per group

f - frequency of occurrence

1 - initial base of compound

2 - second base

3 - final base

As table 1 shows, for compound nouns that have 2 bases, the primary stress falls on the first element in NE. Altogether, 94.5% of the tokens follow this pattern. There is no marked difference between the pattern observable in males and that of females. The implication of this is that the pitch contour for both NE and RP is rise-fall, as shown below:

This contour shows that the pitch on house is higher than that on fly. Therefore house is more prominent than fly.

The metrical tree for mealtime below further illustrates the stress pattern of NE compound nouns:

According to this tree, meal is a strong foot, while time is a weak foot; thus, meal is more prominent than time. Here is its metrical grid:

The grid shows that the first syllable is more prominent than the second syllable. This is because the highest x is on meal.

For 3-base compound nouns, senior common room, post office box, one-man show, video cassette recorder and network news were used. All the subjects assigned primary stress to the first base of network news. All the male subjects also assigned primary stress to the first base of one-man show; but only 23 females assigned primary stress to its first base; while 2 females assigned primary stress to its second base. For senior common room, 24 males and 23 females assigned primary stress to its first base; 1 male and 2 females assigned primary stress to its second base; but no subject assigned primary stress to its third base. Post office box behaved differently: only 1 male and 1 female assigned primary stress to its first base; 21 males and 22 females assigned primary stress to its second base; while 4 males and 2 females assigned primary stress to its third base. For video cassette recorder, 23 males and 23 females assigned primary stress to its first base; only 2 females assigned primary stress to its second base; and only 2 males assigned primary stress to its third base; no male and no female assigned primary stress to its second and third bases, respectively.

Table 2 below captures how NE stress-marks compound nouns with three bases.

Table 2: Stress-pattern of 3-base compound nouns in NE

From this table, we can see that for 76.8% of tokens, the primary stress was on the first base; for 20% of them the primary stress was on the second base, while 3.2% of the tokens had primary stress on the third base. This means that only 3.2% of them (1 subject out of 50) followed the Compound Prominence Rule. This implies that, generally, the primary stress falls on the first lexical item. This is a radical deviation from the Compound Prominence Rule. The native speaker followed a similar pattern; she assigned primary stress to the first base of all the words. The pitch contour for 3-base compound nouns in NE is shown below:

As seen in this pitch contour, one has the highest pitch; thus it is more prominent than the other two words. Here is the metrical tree:

According to this metrical tree, the foot that contains one (made up of one-man) is strong, while the second foot (made up of show) is weak. Therefore, that strong foot is more prominent than the weak one. The metrical grid below shows that the first syllable is more prominent than the third syllable; the second syllable is the least prominent:

In this metrical grid, there are two prominent syllables (words) – one and show – as seen in the middle row of x. But one is the most prominent syllable, because the highest x is on it. Therefore, one is stressed.

Based on these patterns, we therefore assert that in NE, for compound nouns, whether those with 2 bases or 3 bases, the primary stress usually falls on the first base. Thus, NE obeys the Compound Prominence Rule, which states that ‘In a pair of sister nodes [N1 N2]L, where L is a lexical category, N2 is strong if it branches above the word level’ (Giegerich, Reference Giegerich1992: 256).

Compound verbs

To determine the stress pattern of compound verbs in NE, backfire, backslide, spearhead, stage-manage and mass produce were tested. 7 males and 9 females assigned primary stress to the first base of backfire, while 18 males and 11 females assigned primary stress to its second base. 4 males and 5 females assigned primary stress to the first base of backslide, while 21 males and 20 females assigned primary stress to its second base. 7 males and 14 females assigned primary stress to the first base of spearhead, while 18 males and 20 females assigned primary stress to its second base. 13 males and 21 females assigned primary stress to the first base of stage-manage, while 12 males and 21 females assigned primary stress to its second base. 20 males and 25 females assigned primary stress to the first base of mass produce, while only 5 males assigned primary stress to its second base. Table 3 below shows the general pattern for stressing verbs in NE.

Table 3: Stress pattern of compound verbs in NE

This table shows that male NE speakers put the primary stress on the second element of compound verbs (59.2% of tokens) more often than on the primary element. For the female group the converse held: 59.2% of the tokens produced by females had primary stress on the first base. However, both groups lack consistency in the way they stress-mark compound verbs generally. The word stage-manage created problem for most females. Some of them interpreted it as a noun. In all, what obtains in NE is that for a compound verb either the first or second base is assigned a primary stress; half of the subjects assigned a primary stress to the first base while half of them assigned it to the second base. This is a radical departure from the pattern observable in the speech of the native speaker, who assigned primary stress to the first base of each of the words tested.

The above analysis shows that compound verbs in NE behave differently from compound nouns. While some of them behave like phrases, others behave like compounds. Some obey the Compound Prominence Rule while others obey the Phrasal Prominence Rule, which states that in a pair of sister nodes [ N1 N2 ]P, where P is a phrasal category, N2 is strong (Giegerich, Reference Giegerich1992: 253). For NE compound verbs, the pitch contour is either:

The pitch contour in (a) shows that spear has pitch that is higher than head. This implies that it is stronger than head. However, the reverse is the case with the pitch contour in (b).

The metrical tree is either:

The metrical tree in (c) indicates that spear is a strong foot, while head is a weak foot; this is why spear is stressed. But the opposite is the case with the metrical tree in (d).

The metrical grid, showing prominence relation, is either:

There are two levels of x here because there the syllable level is coterminous with the foot level. The grid shows that in (e) the first syllable is more prominent than the second syllable, since the highest pitch is on it; while the reverse is the case in (f).

Compound adjectives

The compound adjectives work-shy, bullet-proof, crystal clear, narrow minded and part time were used for analysis. 18 males and 22 females assigned primary stress to the first base of work-shy, while 7 males and 3 females assigned primary stress to its second base. 11 males and 15 females assigned primary stress to the first base of bullet proof, while 14 males and 10 females assigned primary stress to its second base. All the subjects assigned primary stress to the first base of crystal-clear. All the males and 24 females assigned primary stress to the first base of narrow minded, while only 1 female assigned primary stress to its second base. 11 males and 10 females assigned primary stress to the first base of part-time, while 14 males and 15 females assigned primary stress to its second base.

In NE, compound adjectives behave like compound nouns, in that the primary stress usually falls on the first base. This is shown in Table 4 below.

Table 4: Stress-pattern of compound adjectives in NE

This implies that NE applies Compound Prominence Rule. 74.4% of tokens had primary stress on the first lexical item in a compound adjective. In all the instances of compound adjectives tested, the native speaker assigned primary stress on the first lexical item.

The general pitch contour for compound adjectives in NE is:

In this contour, crystal has the highest pitch; this makes it to be more prominent than clear.

The general metrical tree is illustrated below with work shy:

The triangle above shows that the foot covers the entire word on which it is put. In this tree, work is a strong foot, while shy is a weak foot; thus, work is stronger than shy.

The metrical grid in NE for narrow-minded is shown below:

According to this grid, the first syllable is the most prominent; the third syllable is more prominent than the second and the fourth syllables.

Compound adverbs

Single-mindedly, half heartedly, half hourly, light heartedly and sober-mindedly were used to test how NE stress marks compound adverbs. All the subjects stressed the first base of each of these words. The only exceptions are single-mindedly and sober-mindedly, while 1 female each stressed the second base of each.

The stress pattern obtainable in compound adverbs is not different from that found in compound adjectives, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Stress-pattern of compound adverbs in NE

From this table, it could be seen that 99.2% of the tokens had primary stress on the first lexical item, thus obeying the Compound Prominence Rule. The pattern in NE corresponds to that found in the speech of the native speaker, who stressed the first base of each of the words tested. Therefore, the pitch contour for compound adverbs in NE is:

Here, half has pitch that is higher than way; this is why the former is more prominent than the latter.

The metrical tree for single-mindedly is shown below:

According to this metrical tree, single is a strong foot, while mindedly is a weak foot. Therefore, single is assigned the primary stress. For sober-mindedly, below is the metrical grid, showing prominence relations among the syllables:

The grid indicates that the first syllable is more prominent than all others; the third syllable is more prominent than the remaining three syllables.

Comments and conclusion

With the exception of compound verbs, all compounds have a rise-fall pitch contour; compound verbs may have either a rise-fall or fall-rise pitch contour. This shows that NE speakers invariably make the first lexical item prominent. It is as if they always contrast the first lexical item with other lexical items. Even if other lexical items are added to the compound, as in the case of compound nouns, the stress pattern remains unchanged. In essence, NE obeys the Compound Prominence Rule, which assigns a primary stress to the first node except if it branches at the word level. This is also the case in casual conversations and the radio programme used as data for this work. Thus, NE has a regular pattern, unlike RP, in which some compounds behave like phrases (Giegerich, Reference Giegerich1992: 257). Surprisingly, the highly educated native speaker used in this study constantly followed the Compound Prominence Rule. Her realisations were: foul play, gold medallist and national anthem, in contrast to the RP of Daniel Jones' (Reference Jones2006) Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary which assigns primary stress to the second lexical item of each. It could be that we are dealing with ongoing changes in RP stress assignment in compounds, since Daniel Jones' original work is of the early 20th century. Clearly, there is much work to be done on compound stress in Nigeria and beyond.

Dr ADESINA B. SUNDAY is a lecturer in the Department of English, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. He is a neurolinguist and also teaches English Phonology, Syntax and Semantics. E-mail:

References

Adekunle, M. A. 1979. ‘Non-random variation in (the) Nigerian English.’ In Ubahakwe, E. (ed.), Varieties and Functions of the English Language in Nigeria. Ibadan: African University Press, pp. 2742.Google Scholar
Adesanoye, F. A. 1973. ‘A study of varieties of written English in Nigeria.’ Unpublished PhD thesis. Ibadan: University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
Akinjobi, A. 2002. ‘Nigerian English or Standard English suprasegmentals: the question of which variety to teach.’ In Babatunde, S. T. and Adeyanju, D. S. (eds), Language, Meaning and Society: Papers in Honour of E. E. Adegbija at 50. Ilorin: Haytee, pp. 3050.Google Scholar
Banjo, A. 1979. ‘Beyond intelligibility.’ In Ubahakwe, E. (ed.), Varieties and Functions of the English Language in Nigeria. Ibadan: African University Press, pp. 713.Google Scholar
Banjo, A. 1995. ‘On codifying Nigerian English: research so far.’ In Bamgbose, A., Banjo, A. & Thomas, A. (eds), New English: A West African Perspective. Ibadan: Mosuro, pp. 203–31.Google Scholar
Banjo, A. 1996. Making A Virtue of Necessity: An Overview of the English Language in Nigeria. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press.Google Scholar
Brosnahan, L. F. 1958. ‘English in Southern Nigeria.’ English Studies, 39(1–6), pp. 97110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, A. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. 1992. English Phonology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. A. 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Idsardi, W. 1995. ‘General properties of stress and metrical structure.’ In Goldsmith, J. A. (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 403–43.Google Scholar
Jones, D. 2006. Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jowitt, D. 1991. Nigerian English Usage: An Introduction. Lagos: Longman Nigeria.Google Scholar
Kager, R. 1995. ‘The metrical theory of word stress.’ In Goldsmith, J. A. (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kujore, O. 1985. English Usage: Some Notable Nigerian Variations. Ibadan: Evans Brothers.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. 1975. ‘The Intonational System of English.’ Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. 1977. ‘On stress and linguistic rhythm.’ Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249336.Google Scholar
Napoli, D. J. 1996. Linguistics: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ogu, J. N. 1992. A Historical Survey of English and the Nigerian Situation. Ibadan: Kraft Book Ltd.Google Scholar
Roach, P. 1997. English Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roach, P. 1993. Aspects of Cameroon English Phonology. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Simo Bobda, A. 1995. ‘The phonologies of Nigerian English and Cameroon English.’ In Bamgbose, A., Banjo, A. & Thomas, A. (eds), New English: A West African Perspective. Ibadan: Mosuro, pp. 248–68.Google Scholar
Simo Bobda, A. 2000. ‘Comparing some phonological features across African accents of English.’ English Studies 81(3), pp. 249–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiffen, B. 1974. ‘The Intelligibility of Nigerian English.’ Unpublished PhD thesis. London: University of London.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1: Stress-pattern of 2 base-compound nouns in NE

Figure 1

Table 2: Stress-pattern of 3-base compound nouns in NE

Figure 2

Table 3: Stress pattern of compound verbs in NE

Figure 3

Table 4: Stress-pattern of compound adjectives in NE

Figure 4

Table 5: Stress-pattern of compound adverbs in NE