Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T11:04:42.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic diversity of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunit compositions in bread wheat landraces originated from Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2016

Ridvan Temizgul*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Erciyes University, Faculty of Science, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey
Mikail Akbulut
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Erciyes University, Faculty of Science, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey
Domenico Lafiandra
Affiliation:
Department of Agrobiology and Agrochemistry, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: rtemizgul@erciyes.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Focusing on 116 bread wheat landraces, this study investigated high molecular weight glutenin allele polymorphism, gene diversity, genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in Glu-1 loci. To identify gluten alleles, sodium dodesyl sulphate-polyacrylamide, gel electrophoresis was used and for statistical analyses POPGENE software was employed. The results indicated that average genetic variation (h) was the highest in Glu-B1 (0.6421) and the lowest in Glu-A1 locus (0.4548); genetic similarity ratio (I) was the highest in Glu-B1 (1.4170); the highest average genetic diversity (Ht) was observed in Glu-B1 (0.6575) and the lowest diversity was observed in Glu-A1 (0.4558). It was also observed that genetic diversity in Glu-1 locus was largely due to intra-population variations. Inter-population gene flow was also calculated as 4.0051. Marmara and Southeastern Anatolia regions, the results further indicated, had the highest (2.8691) and lowest (0.1694) heterozygosity. Genetic erosion risk for Turkish bread wheat landraces was also seen to be high. Considering the mutual analyses of subunits of nationwide wheat landraces, it is possible to speculate about a limited migration between the landraces. LD of the landraces was largely because of this limited migration and/or epistatic natural selection. Since Turkey is known as the gene centre for major cereals including wheat, barley, rye and oat, where they diversified and spread throughout the world, studying the gluten allele diversity of Turkish bread wheat landraces is important. In addition, this study has revealed the applicability of LD, and neutrality tests to gluten protein diversity for the first time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2016 

Introduction

There are eight regions throughout the world where agricultural practices have been carried out for centuries and which can be classified as gene centres of various species (Vavilov Reference Vavilov1951). Turkey is located right at the intersection of two of these centres (Near East and the Mediterranean) and is known as the gene centre for major cereals such as wheat, barley, rye and oat, from which these types diversified and spread throughout the world. These early cultivated forms were diploid (AA) (Einkorn) and tetraploid (AABB) (Emmer) wheat originated in the southeastern parts of Turkey (Heun et al., Reference Heun, SchaferPregl, Klawan, Castagna, Accerbi, Borghi and Salamini1997; Dubcovsky and Dvorak, Reference Dubcovsky and Dvorak2007). Cultivation of these early wheats shifted from there to near east about 9000 years ago and hexaploid bread wheat emerged then for the first time (Feldman, Reference Feldman, Bonjean and Angus2001).

High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) are encoded by Glu-1 loci present on the long arms of the homologous group 1 chromosomes of bread wheat (1A, 1B and 1D) at the Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 loci (Payne et al., Reference Payne, Roberts and Holt1986). Each locus contains two closely linked genes coding for an x and y type subunit (Payne et al., Reference Payne, Holt and Law1981), but a variable number of subunits, ranging from three to five, are observed in different bread wheat cultivars. Allelic variation has been reported to be present at each Glu-1 locus of bread wheat; therefore, a numbering system was used to describe different allelic subunits (Payne et al., Reference Payne, Holt and Law1981; Payne and Lawrence, Reference Payne and Lawrence1983). HMWGS are part of the glutenin polymers with a number of subunits and allelic variations strongly influencing molecular weight distribution of polymers and, consequently, dough properties (Payne, Reference Payne1987).

Ewens–Watterson (EW) presented a neutrality test through using allele frequencies to determine the effects of selection (Ewens, Reference Ewens1972). While directional selection supports one or more alleles, balanced selection holds most of the alleles in relatively equal frequencies. EW test employs observed homozygosity statistics (F obs is defined as the sum of squares of allele frequencies) and compares it with the expected value. When the null hypothesis of natural evolution is rejected, this test recommends either balanced selection (F obs << F exp) or directional selection (F obs >> F exp) impact. EW test was carried out to determine the selection impacts in landraces of bread wheat in Turkey.

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) represents non-random associations causing deviations of alleles on each close-linked locus from the frequencies calculated with Hardy–Weinberg equation (Weir, Reference Weir1979). Allele or genetic indicator combinations in LD results in deviations from the combination expected from randomized formation of haploids based on the frequencies of these alleles in population. Non-randomized combinations of polymorphisms over certain loci are measured with their LD (Weir, Reference Weir1979; Ohta, Reference Ohta1982). When the population subunit structuring is prevented and previous subpopulations continue to combine randomly, average homozygosity decreases and heterozygosity increases accordingly. The phenomenon of decreased homozygosity due to combined subpopulations is known as ‘Wahlund effect’.

The present study was conducted with the bread wheat landraces of Turkey to determine the genetic variations, diversity, LD, sample heterozygosity and genetic erosion risks.

Material and methods

Wheat materials

In this study, 116 bread wheat landraces originating from different regions of Turkey (Aegean, Central Anatolia, Marmara, Mediterranean, Black Sea, Eastern Anatolia and Southeastern Anatolia) were used (online Supplementary Table S1). They were supplied from ‘Ankara Field Crops Central Research Institute’ and ‘Izmir Aegean Agricultural Research Institute’. Fifteen standard genotypes (Chinese Spring, Drago, Lobeiro, Svevo, Lira, Durambo, Ak 702, Bezostaya 1, Kate-A1, Bayraktar, Mızrak, Yakar, Atay 85, Gerek 79 and Tosunbey) were used as references to identify glutenin alleles.

Gluten extraction and sodium dodecyl sulphate-Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analyses

Glutenin proteins were extracted in accordance with the method described by Gao et al. (Reference Gao, Appelbee, Mekuria, Chalmers and Mather2012). The Li et al. (Reference Li, Jiang, Wei, Xia and Liu2012) method was used with slight modification for electrophoresis of glutenin subunits. 30–60 mA currents were applied per gel during electrophoresis. Gels were stained with comassie blue for 12–24 h and were kept in washing solution for 5 h. The ingredient of staining (225 mg of CBB-R 250 was dissolved in 187.5 ml of methanol, 750 ml 10% TCA and 62.5 ml glacial acetic acid) and washing solution (333 ml methanol, 100 ml 10% TCA and 567 ml distilled water) was modified and imaged under the gel documentation system.

Identification of glutenin alleles

Glutenin alleles of local wheat populations were numbered as described by Payne and Lawrence (Reference Payne and Lawrence1983) and McIntosh et al. (Reference McIntosh, Hart and Gale1994). Verification of alleles defined by allele specific primers was also performed.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was carried out based on frequencies of HMW-GS alleles. Statistical analyses were performed for individual alleles, subunits, loci and geographical regions. Allele frequency of Glu-1 loci of the wheat landraces obtained from seven different regions of Turkey was calculated according to Gupta et al. (Reference Gupta, Bekes and Wrigley1991). Percentage allele frequencies were calculated by using the formula; ‘(number of individual alleles/number of total wheat samples) × 100’.

POPGENE version 1.31 software was used for statistical analysis. Genetic diversity analyses in each sample were performed by using allele frequencies, the effective number of alleles per locus (Ne), observed number of alleles (Na), Nei's gene diversity and Shannon's Information index (Lewontin, Reference Lewontin1972) according to the unbiased estimate method of Nei's (Reference Nei1973). Polymorphism percentages were calculated using the formula; ‘number of polymorphic allele/number of total alleles’. EW homozygosity (or neutrality) test in samples and regions was calculated by employing sampling distribution of neutral alleles according to the Manly (Reference Manly1985). Observed value of F gives the homozygosity of sample. Genetic diversity analyses in subpopulations were performed according to Nei (Reference Nei1987). Ht, Hs, Gst and Nm indicate average genetic diversity, genetic diversity within populations; genetic diversity between populations, gene flow between populations, respectively. Nm was calculated by the formula ‘0.5(1-Gst)/Gst’ according to the McDermott and McDonald (Reference McDermott and McDonald1993). Genetic identity and genetic distance analyses between populations were performed by Nei's original and unbiased measures according to Nei (Reference Nei1973, Reference Nei1978). Dendrogram was drawn according to Nei (Reference Nei1973, Reference Nei1978). Dendogram was constructed by the method of UPGMA (Unweighed Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean). This method has been modified from NEIGHBOR according to the PHYLIP 3.5 procedure. LD in unique populations was calculated according to the Weir (Reference Weir1979). Two loci analyses in subpopulations were performed according to the Ohta (Reference Ohta1982). Multilocus analyses (single locus effect; average gene diversity (MH), variance of the diversity (VH) and Wahlund's effect (WH), two locus effect, average disequilibrium (MD), Wahlund's effect (WC), the interaction between MD and WC, variance of disequilibrium (VD), co-variance of interaction (CI), total variance and average variance) were then performed according to Brown and Feldman (Reference Brown and Feldman1981). This analysis gives observed heterozygosity and distribution normality in populations. Comparative analyses of subunits in populations were performed considering the expected and observed values of each subunit in populations.

Results

HMW gluten polymorphism

In this study, 22 different individual alleles and 19 HMW subunits were identified in 39 different combinations of Turkish bread wheat landraces. Gluten subunit frequencies and representative gluten band profiles obtained in this study are presented in Table 1 and Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. HMW gluten band profiles as a result of SDS-PAGE separation of Glu-1 locus of Turkish bread wheat landraces.

Table 1. Genetic diversity analyses; Ewens–Watterson neutrality test* and allele frequencies for Glu-1 locus

NS, number of samples; Na, observed number of alleles; Ne, effective number of alleles; h, Nei's gene diversity; I, Shannon's Information Index; Ht, average genetic diversity; Hs, genetic diversity within populations; Gst, genetic diversity among populations; Nm, gene flow between populations.

Number of polymorphic regions: 3.

Ratio of polymorphic regions (%): 100.00.

*This statistic was calculated by using 1000 representative samples.

**Nm, 0.5 (1 – Gst)/Gst; Freq., frequencies; SE. standard error; L95 and U95, 95% lower and upper confidence interval.

Genetic variation analyses

Mean genetic variation among the nationwide landraces of wheat was determined to be (h) 0.455 at the Glu-A1, 0.642 at the Glu-B1 and 0.600 at the Glu-D1 locus. Mean genetic variation at the Glu-1 locus was (h) 0.566 ± 0.098. Mean Shannon Information Index (genetic similarity ratio) (I) was found to be 0.759 in Glu-A1, 1.417 in Glu-B1 and 1.179 in Glu-D1 locus. Mean Shannon Information Index (I) was found to be 1.118 ± 0.333 (Table 1).

The highest genetic variation was observed in the Mediterranean areas (0.623 ± 0.091) and the lowest variation was observed in the Aegean regions (0.253 ± 0.153). Considering the genetic similarity with regard to subunits, the highest value was observed in the Mediterranean areas (1.163 ± 0.253) and the lowest value was observed in Aegean regions (0.456 ± 0.263) (Table 2).

Table 2. Region-based genetic variation analyses of Glu-1 locus

Na, observed number of alleles; Ne, effective number of alleles; h, Nei's gene diversity; I, Shannon's Information index; NS, number of samples.

Region-based genetic variation analyses of Glu-1 locus (Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1) are provided in Table 2. Results revealed the highest genetic diversity of Glu-A1 locus in Marmara (0.569) and the least diversity in Aegean region (0.165). The highest value of Glu-B1 locus was observed in Marmara (0.722) and the lowest value was observed in the Aegean regions (0.429). The highest and the lowest values of Glu-D1 locus were 0.711 and 0.165 for Mediterranean and Aegean regions, respectively.

The highest Shannon information index of Glu-A1 locus was observed in the Black Sea regions (0.924) and the lowest value was observed in the Aegean regions (0.305). The highest index value of Glu-B1 locus was observed in Marmara (1.424) and the lowest value was observed in the Aegean regions (0.759). The highest and the lowest values of Glu-D1 locus were 1.414 and 0.305 for the Mediterranean and the Aegean regions, respectively (Table 2).

Inter-population neutrality tests

Interpopulation EW neutrality test indicated that dispersion of gluten subunits in Glu-1 loci had balanced selection in Turkish bread wheat landraces (Obs. F < 0.5). EW neutrality test for the material analysed revealed that Glu-A1b, Glu-A1c, Glu-B1b, Glu-B1c, Glu-B1d, Glu-B1e, Glu-D1a and Glu-D1d subunits had balanced selection, while other subunits had directional selection (Table 1).

Genetic diversity analyses

Genetic diversity at the Glu-A1 locus of nationwide landrace wheat was found to be (Ht) 0.456 genetic diversity within the populations was (Hs) 0.402, genetic diversity among the populations was (Gst) 0.117 (Table 1) and estimated gene flow between the populations (Nm) was calculated as 3.767. A 100% polymorphism was observed among the subunits in Glu-A1 locus. Genetic diversity at the Glu-B1 locus of nationwide landrace wheat was found to be (Ht) 0.658, genetic diversity within the populations was (Hs) 0.582, genetic diversity among the populations was (Gst) 0.115 and estimated gene flow between the populations (Nm) was calculated as 3.843. A 100% polymorphism was observed among the subunits in Glu-B1 locus. Genetic diversity at the Glu-D1 locus of nationwide landrace wheat was found to be (Ht) 0.586, genetic diversity within the populations was (Hs) 0.527, genetic diversity among the populations was (Gst) 0.102 and estimated gene flow between the populations (Nm) was calculated as 4.425. Again 100% polymorphism was observed among the subunits in Glu-D1 locus.

Genetic identity and genetic distances

Region-based genetic similarities and distances among the wheat landraces are provided in Table 3. Results revealed that the highest similarity in Glu-1 locus was observed between the Mediterranean and the Black Sea regions (0.952), the Black Sea and Eastern Anatolia (0.941) and Central Anatolia and the Mediterranean regions (0.939), respectively.

Table 3. Genetic similarity (upper diagonal) and genetic distances (lower diagonal) in Glu-1 locus

On the other hand, the highest distance in Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 loci were observed between Marmara and the Aegean (0.468), Southeastern and Marmara (0.291) and the Mediterranean and Marmara regions (0.269), respectively (Table 3).

The dendrogram drawn according to original measurements of Nei (Reference Nei1972) revealed that the Mediterranean, the Black Sea and Central Anatolia regions were clustered together (Fig. 1). Other regions are clustered separately.

LD, single and/or multiple loci and heterozygosity analyses

Considering the LD, significant LD was detected among individual subunits (P < 0.05). In general, it can be inferred that there was a limited migration between wheat landraces. LD occurs because of a limited migration. However, the LD between Glu-A1b and Glu-D1a and between Glu-D1d, Glu-D1a subunit and Glu-D1d suggest an epistatic natural selection. The highest heterozygosity (2.8691) was observed in Marmara region. The heterozygosity was the lowest in Southeastern Anatolia (0.1694) and Eastern Anatolia region (0.1859) (Table 4). In terms of single locus effect, average gene diversity was calculated to be 0.6895 (with a variance of diversity of 0.0454 and Wahlund effect of −0.0172). Considering the comparative analysis of subunits carried out on subunits of wheat landraces, dispersion of Glu-A1c, Glu-B1c, Glu-B1d, Glu-B1e and Glu-D1a were significantly different (P < 0.05). For the dispersion of other subunits, significant difference was not observed between expected and observed values (P > 0.05).

Table 4. Multiple locus analysis in single populations and Hypothesis tests for observed values of K

M1–M4 are the first four observed values, EM1–EM4 are respectively the expected values of these four values, X2–X4 are heterozygosity ratios (Xi = Mi/EMi-1), SEM2-SEM4, standard error of M2-M4; L2-L4, 95% lower confidence interval of M2–M4; U2–U4, 95% upper confidence interval of M2–M4; Aver, average [According to the Brown et al., Reference Brown, Feldman and Nevo1980; Brown and Feldman, Reference Brown and Feldman1981].

Multiple locus analyses on bread wheat landraces revealed that the values observed in regions, except for the Aegean and Eastern Anatolia, were higher than upper confidence interval of 95% (U2-U4) (Table 4). Therefore, it was assumed that the samples did not exhibit normal distribution in these landraces. However, samples exhibited normal distribution in the Aegean and Eastern Anatolia regions.

Population subunits were subjected to Brown and Feldman (Reference Brown and Feldman1981) multiple locus analysis. With regard to single locus effect, average gene diversity (MH) was calculated as 0.6895; variance of the diversity (VH) was 0.0454 and Wahlund's effect (WH) was −0.0172. With regard to two locus effect, average disequilibrium (MD) was 0.3535; Wahlund's effect (WC) was 0.0108; the interaction between MD and WC (AI) was 0.0307; variance of disequilibrium (VD) was 0.1622; co-variance of interaction (CI) was −0.0592; total variance was (MH + VH + WH + MD + WC + AI) 1.1128 and average variance was (MH + MD + AI + VD + CI) 1.1767. Considering the mutual analyses of subunits of nationwide wheat landraces, one may speculate on the possibility of a limited migration between the landraces. LD of the landraces was largely due to this limited migration and/or epistatic natural selection [(D'IS)2 > (D'ST)2 and (DST)2 > (DIS)2; (D'IS)2 < (D'ST)2 and (DST)2 < (DIS)2 respectively].

Discussion

Considering the fact that Turkey is among the gene centres for wheat (Vavilov, Reference Vavilov1951), we expected high genetic diversity in Glu-1 loci of local wheat landraces in this country and studied 116 wheat genotypes for gluten allele polymorphism to determine gluten allele profile of landraces and high quality score wheat genotypes as candidates for breeding. Landraces are great resources for allele diversity of different agronomic characters and in this study local wheat genotypes are investigated for gluten allele diversity. Although, there are several articles reporting the diversity of gluten alleles for different regions of the world, Turkish wheat landraces were not screened thoroughly for gluten allele diversity. Fourteen different alleles were defined in Turkish durum wheat in a study carried out by Turchetta et al. (Reference Turchetta, Ciaffi, Porceddu and Lafiandra1995) and 27 in Asian wheat (Terasawa et al., Reference Terasawa, Takara, Hirano, Kato, Kawahara, Saskuma and Sasanuma2010). In this study, 22 different individual alleles and 19 HMW subunits were identified in 39 different combinations in Turkish bread wheat landraces (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Regional dendogram for Glu-1 locus.

In Glu-A1 locus, three alleles (Glu-A1a, Glu-A1b and Glu-A1c) were defined in Turkish durum wheat in a study carried out by Branlard et al. (Reference Branlard, Autran and Monneveux1989). Correspondingly, three alleles (Glu-A1a, Glu-A1b and GluA1c) were defined in Glu-A1 locus of Turkish bread wheat in this study. In Glu-B1 locus, seven alleles were defined in Turkish durum wheat. However, nine alleles (Glu-B1a, Glu-B1b, Glu-B1c, Glu-B1d, Glu-B1e, Glu-B1f, Glu-B1h, Glu-B1i and Glu-B1z) were defined in Glu-B1 locus of Turkish bread wheat landraces in this study. In Glu-D1 locus, five alleles had so far been defined in Turkish durum wheat (Branlard et al., Reference Branlard, Autran and Monneveux1989): notwithstanding, seven alleles (Glu-D1a, Glu-D1b, Glu-D1c, Glu-D1d, Glu-D1h, GluD1l and Glu-D15) were defined in Glu-D1 locus of Turkish bread wheat landraces in this study.

An alternative approach to summarizing and forecasting genetic diversity can be based on Shannon's diversity index (Sherwin, Reference Sherwin2010). Shannon diversity index offers a possible route for integrating diversity across all levels of biological organization (Smouse and Ward, Reference Smouse and Ward1978). Thus, this index could also be used to forecast and summarize allele diversity in different populations of the same species. Shannon's index accounts for both abundance and evenness of the alleles present. Shannon's equitability (EH) can be calculated by dividing H by Hmax. Equitability assumes a value between 0 and 1 with 1 being complete evenness. Shannon's equitability information indices for Turkish bread wheat landraces were 0.691, 0.645 and 0, 606 for Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1, respectively. Considering these results, Turkish bread wheat landraces were more homogeneous in Glu-A1 locus and more heterogeneous in Glu-D1 locus. These results indicate that there is a considerable amount of diversity in Turkish bread wheat landraces.

Gene flow refers to the movement of genes between populations, and takes place in plants through the dispersion of seed or pollens. Gene flow through cross-pollination occurs at such a level in all crops, even in an autogamous plant like wheat (Ellstrand et al., Reference Ellstrand, Prentice and Hancock1999). Generally, if gene flow (Nm) is higher than 1, the differentiation in population is slow. On the contrary, when gene flow (Nm) is smaller than 1, local differentiation of population occurs. In the current study average gene flow is higher than 1 (4.00), which is indicative of a minor differentiation of populations. Although we do not expect that much scale of gene flow in an autogamous species, seed-mediated gene flow may occur through exchange of seed materials among growers.

Unpredictably, although there is geographical barrier between the Mediterranean and the Black sea region, they were genetically identical in UPGMA. Marmara region is the most distant to other regions. This result is expected since this is an industrial region and wheat cultivation is quite low there.

Van Hintum and Elings (Reference Van Hintum and Elings1991) assessed the phenotypic and gluten-based relationships in Syrian local durum wheat cultivars with different geographical origins. Researchers identified 19 HMW subunits in 48 different combinations. In this study, 21 individual alleles and 19 HMW subunits were identified in 39 different combinations. Gianibelli et al. (Reference Gianibelli, Echaide, Larroque, Carrillo and Dubcovsky2002) studied biochemical and molecular characterization of Glu-1 locus of Argentinean wheat cultivars. Researchers analysed 107 wheat collections of Argentina through SDS-PAGE and identified 11 alleles of which three were coded on Glu-A1, six on Glu-B1 and two on Glu-D1. The researchers observed the highest frequency in Glu-D1d allele. Lerner et al. (Reference Lerner, Kolman and Rogers2009) also studied endosperm storage protein diversity in Argentinean bread wheat cultivars and they observed three, six and two alleles in 17 allelic combinations at the Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 loci, respectively. The mean genetic variation index (H) observed for the glutenin loci was 0.589 for the studied cultivars. The highest frequencies for the observed alleles were Glu-A1b (63.9%), Glu-B1c (41.2%), and Glu-D1d (94.1%).

In Turkish cultivars, Glu-A1c subunit had the highest frequency with 68.97%. Argentinean wheat types were distributed in 18 different groups based on HMW-GS contents and Glu-A1a/Glu-B1al/Glu-D1d had the highest frequencies (22%) (Gianibelli et al., Reference Gianibelli, Echaide, Larroque, Carrillo and Dubcovsky2002). In Turkish bread wheat landraces, Glu-B1b/Glu-D1a allelic combination had the highest ratio (22.48%).

Primitive and less cultivated genotypes are generally considered as significant source of variation with regard to disease resistance, kernel protein quality and resistance against various ecological stresses (Porceddu et al., Reference Porceddu, Ceoloni, Lafiandra, Tanzarella and Mugnozza1988; Kaplan et al., Reference Kaplan, Akar, Kamalak and Bulut2014). In previous studies, higher variations were reported in HMW subunits of Turkish wheat compared with the Italian, Australian, American, Canadian, Spanish and French wheat cultivars (Autran and Feillet, Reference Autran and Feillet1985; Margiotta et al., Reference Margiotta, Colaprico and Lafiandra1987; Carrillo et al., Reference Carrillo, Vazquez and Orellana1990; Liu and Shepherd, Reference Liu and Shepherd1991). These were expected results since Turkish lines are highly old and local races with centuries of history. Intensive breeding probably decreased the genetic variations among western wheat (Porceddu et al., Reference Porceddu, Ceoloni, Lafiandra, Tanzarella and Mugnozza1988). Notwithstanding, a study carried out by Manifesto et al. (Reference Manifesto, Schlatter, Hopp, Suarez and Dubcovsky2001) demonstrated that there was no significant decrease in genetic diversity of Argentinian bread wheat cultivars released in the last half century.

Terasawa et al. (Reference Terasawa, Takara, Hirano, Kato, Kawahara, Saskuma and Sasanuma2010) studied genetic variation in high molecular weight gluten subunits of Asian wheat and identified three alleles in Glu-A1 locus and nine alleles in Glu-B1 locus. Glu-B1b was observed in 76.5% of accessions. In the present study, frequency of this allele was observed as 56.03%. Terasawa et al. (Reference Terasawa, Takara, Hirano, Kato, Kawahara, Saskuma and Sasanuma2010) reported similar characteristics for Western Asian, Afghan and Eastern Asian wheat but indicated different characteristics for Caucasian and Central Asian wheats. As previously indicated by Terasawa et al. (Reference Terasawa, Kawahara, Sasakuma and Sasanuma2009) and Lagudah et al. (Reference Lagudah, Flood and Halloran1987), Glu-A1c, Glu-B1b and Glu-D1a were the most common genotypes in Western and Eastern Asia. These alleles had the highest frequencies also in the present study. These alleles were also reported to be common in Japan and Xinjiang border lines (Nakamura, Reference Nakamura2000; Cong et al., Reference Cong, Takata, Zong, Ikeda, Yanaka, Nagamine and Fujimaki2005). All these outcomes indicated that Glu-A1c, Glu-B1b and Glu-D1a genotypes were dominant from Afghanistan to Far East, from Mesopotamia to Central Asia. This genotype is not common in European endemic wheat (Gregova et al., Reference Gregova, Hermuth, Kraic and Dotlacil1999, Reference Gregova, Hermuth, Kraic and Dotlacil2006). Genetic diversity level is relatively low in central parts of Asia (Western Asia, Afghanistan, Eastern Asia) and relatively high in border lines (Caucasia, Central and Southern Asia). Such results were due to differences in frequencies of typical Asian genotypes (Terasawa et al., Reference Terasawa, Takara, Hirano, Kato, Kawahara, Saskuma and Sasanuma2010).

Caballero et al. (Reference Caballero, Martin and Alvarez2009) studied genetic diversity in seed storage proteins of diploid wheat in Turkey and Lebanon and reported higher genetic diversity for Turkish populations (Ht = 0.740) than for Lebanese populations (Ht = 0.685). In the present study, genetic diversity (Ht) in Turkish bread wheat landraces was observed as 0.5666. Marshall and Brown (Reference Marshall, Brown, Franked and Hawkes1975) method are commonly employed to find out the distribution pattern of alleles in different species. According to this method, alleles are defined as frequent if the allele frequency is over 5%, seldom if the frequency is below 5% and rare if the frequency is below 1%. Caballero et al. (Reference Caballero, Martin and Alvarez2009) reported four as frequent, two as seldom and three as rare alleles in Glu-1 locus. The researchers identified 22 alleles in Turkish local bread wheat cultivars as of 11 frequent, seven seldom and four rare. According to intra-population and inter-population gene diversity analysis, Turkish populations (A = 10.75) exhibited higher diversity than the Lebanese populations (A = 5.75) (A = number of alleles in each locus). In the present study, intra- and inter-population gene diversity ratio was observed as 6.3333 ± 3.0551. Besides, higher genetic erosion risk was reported for Turkish populations than for Lebanese populations (Caballero et al., Reference Caballero, Martin and Alvarez2009) so much so that while Ne value was representing 51% of alleles in Lebanese populations, this ratio was 39% in Turkish populations (Ne = impact values of alleles). Similarly, Ne value representing 37.52% of alleles of Turkish bread wheat landraces indicates the higher genetic erosion in the current study. Although the researchers reported genetic similarity (I) as 0.357 (Caballero et al., Reference Caballero, Martin and Alvarez2009), the value was observed as 1.1183 in the present study. In a previous study, HMW-GS-based analyses revealed the genetic diversity as 0.45 for Argentinean, 0.68 in Greek, 0.67 in Spanish, 0.60 in Chinese, 0.59 in American, 0.58 in Australian and 0.46 in Russian wheat (Cooke, Reference Cooke1995). In the present study, genetic diversity was observed as 0.5657. Genetic erosion risk was high in Turkish local bread wheat lines (Ne value represented 37.52% of alleles).

There are insufficient studies about homozygosity (or neutrality) and LD of wheat landraces and cultivars. However, in the present study, possible use of these tests was assessed to determine selection effects in local populations. Neutrality test allows the researchers to gain information about balanced or directional selection of populations under the null hypothesis of evolution. Therefore, in this study, the data obtained from SDS-PAGE analysis were analysed in POPGENE statistics software and ultimately EW neutrality tests and LD were applied in Turkish bread wheat landraces. EW neutrality test revealed that Glu-A1b, Glu-A1c, Glu-B1b, Glu-B1c, Glu-B1d, Glu-B1e, Glu-D1a and Glu-D1d subunits had balanced and other subunits had directional selection. Significant LD between individual subunits was determined (P < 0.05). LD in varieties were largely because of limited migration [(D'IS)2 > (D'ST)2and (DST)2 > (DIS)2]. However, an epistatic natural selection can be mentioned for the LD between Glu-A1b subunit and Glu-D1a and Glu-D1d subunits and between Glu-D1a and Glu-D1d subunits [(D'IS)2 < (D'ST)2 and (DST)2 < (DIS)2].

Single and multiple locus analyses were also performed for Turkish bread wheat landraces in the present study. Average gene diversity with regard to single locus effect was calculated as 0.6895. Considering the comparisons made for intra- and inter-populations of Turkish bread wheat landraces, significant differences were observed in distribution of Glu-A1c, Glu-B1c, Glu-B1d, Glu-B1e and Glu-D1a (P < 0.05).

Wahlund effect is defined as the increased frequency of homozygotes in subdivided populations. It is the reduction in the overall heterozygosity of a population as a result of subpopulation structures. Essentially, if two or more subpopulations have independent allele frequencies, then the overall heterozygosity is reduced, irrespective of whether those subpopulations are in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We might then suspect that selection, or some other factors, was favouring homozygotes. Multiple locus analyses on present landraces revealed that samples did not exhibit normal distribution in regions except for the Aegean and Eastern Anatolia regions. Multiple locus analyses for subunits in populations revealed that average gene diversity with regard to single locus effect was 0.6895 and average gene imbalance with regard to two locus effect was 0.3535 and Wahlund's effect was calculated as 0.0108.

This result indicates higher gene flow and lower heterozygosity in the studied Turkish bread wheat landraces. As a conclusion, studying the gluten allele diversity of Turkish bread wheat landraces is important for breeders, since Turkey is known as one of the gene centres for major cereals including wheat, barley, rye and oat, where they diversified and spread throughout the world. In addition, population structure, LD and neutrality tests were applied for the first time to show the selection effect and genetic erosion risk based on gluten protein diversity of landraces representing the whole country. Considering overall results, there is significant amount of genetic variation in HM weight gluten subunits existing in Turkish bread wheat landraces and they still could be used as a genetic source for breeding purposes.

Supplementary Material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262116000356

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by Scientific Research Projects Department of Erciyes University (with the project number of FBD-3666). We are indebted to Prof. Dr Coşkun Tez (Erciyes University Faculty of Science, Department of Biology) for his support in statistical analyses; to Prof. Dr Behzad Ghaderi Sohi (Professor in English Language and Literature Department of Erciyes University) for editing the English of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

Autran, JC and Feillet, P (1985) Genetic and Technological basis of Protein Quality for Durum Wheat in Pasta. Protein Evaluation in Cereals and Legumes, Thessaloniki 2324 October 1985, Commission of the European Communities, Report EUR 10404 EN, pp. 5971.Google Scholar
Branlard, G, Autran, JC and Monneveux, P (1989) High molecular weight glutenin subunits in durum wheat (Triticum durum). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78: 353358.Google Scholar
Brown, AHD, Feldman, MW and Nevo, E (1980) Multilocus structure of natural populations of Hordeum spontaneum. Genetics 96: 523536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, AHD and Feldman, MW (1981) Population structure of multilocus associations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 78: 59135916.Google Scholar
Caballero, L, Martin, MA and Alvarez, JB (2009) Genetic diversity for seed storage proteins in Lebanon and Turkey populations of wild diploid wheat (Triticum Urartu Thum. Ex Gandil.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 11171124.Google Scholar
Carrillo, JM, Vazquez, JF and Orellana, J (1990) Relationship between gluten strength and glutenin proteins in durum wheat cultivars. Plant Breeding 104: 325333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cong, H, Takata, K, Zong, YF, Ikeda, TM, Yanaka, M, Nagamine, T and Fujimaki, H (2005) Novel highmolecularweight glutenin subunits at the Glu-D1 locus in wheat landraces from the Xinjiang District of China and relationship with winter habit. Breeding Sciences 55: 459463.Google Scholar
Cooke, RJ (1995) Allelic variability at the Glu-1 loci in wheat varieties. Plant Varieties and Seeds 8: 97106.Google Scholar
Dubcovsky, J and Dvorak, J (2007) Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316: 18621866.Google Scholar
Ellstrand, NC, Prentice, HC and Hancock, JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 539563.Google Scholar
Ewens, WJ (1972) The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theoretical Population Biology 3: 87112.Google Scholar
Feldman, M (2001) Origin of cultivated wheat. In: Bonjean, AP and Angus, WJ (eds) The World Wheat Book: a History of Wheat Breeding. Paris, France: Lavoisier Publishing, pp. 356.Google Scholar
Gao, X, Appelbee, MJ, Mekuria, GT, Chalmers, KJ and Mather, DE (2012) A second over expression allele at the Glu-B1 high molecular weight glutenin locus of wheat: sequence characterisation and functional effects. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124: 333343.Google Scholar
Gianibelli, MC, Echaide, M, Larroque, OR, Carrillo, JM and Dubcovsky, J (2002) Biochemical and molecular characterization of Glu-1 loci in Argentinean wheat cultivars. Euphytica 128: 6173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregova, E, Hermuth, J, Kraic, J and Dotlacil, L (1999) Protein heterogeneity in European wheat landraces and obsolete cultivars. Additional information. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46: 521528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregova, E, Hermuth, J, Kraic, J and Dotlacil, L (2006) Protein heterogeneity in European wheat landraces and obsolete cultivars. Additional information II. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53: 867871.Google Scholar
Gupta, RB, Bekes, F and Wrigley, CW (1991) Prediction of physical dough properties from glutenin subunit composition in bread wheats: correlation study. Cereal Chemistry 68: 328333.Google Scholar
Heun, M, SchaferPregl, R, Klawan, D, Castagna, R, Accerbi, M, Borghi, B and Salamini, F (1997) Site of Einkorn wheat domestication identified by DNA fingerprinting. Science 278: 13121314.Google Scholar
Kaplan, M, Akar, T, Kamalak, A and Bulut, S (2014) Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38: 838846.Google Scholar
Lagudah, ES, Flood, RG and Halloran, GM (1987) Variation in high molecular weight glutenin subunits in landraces of hexaploid wheat from Afghanistan. Euphytica 36: 39.Google Scholar
Lerner, SE, Kolman, MA and Rogers, WJ (2009) Quality and endosperm storage protein variation in Argentinean grown bread wheat. I. Allelic diversity and discrimination between cultivars. Journal of Cereal Science 49: 337345.Google Scholar
Lewontin, RC (1972) Testing the theory of natural selection. Nature 236: 181182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F, Jiang, X, Wei, Y, Xia, G and Liu, S (2012) Characterization of a novel type of HMW subunit of glutenin from Australopyrum retrofractum. Gene 492: 6570.Google Scholar
Liu, CY and Shepherd, KW (1991) Variation of LMW glutenin subunits in durum wheat cultivars associated with quality. In: Proceeding Conference of the Cereals International 913 September 1991, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 263266.Google Scholar
Manifesto, MM, Schlatter, AR, Hopp, HE, Suarez, EY and Dubcovsky, J (2001) Quantitative evaluation of genetic diversity in wheat germoplasm using molecular markers. Crop Science 41: 682690.Google Scholar
Manly, BFJ (1985) Spurious Test Results Due to Isolation By Distance. In: BFJ Manly (eds) The statistics of natural selection. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 186195.Google Scholar
Margiotta, B, Colaprico, G and Lafiandra, D (1987) Variation for protein components associated with quality in durum wheat lines and varieties. In: Proceeding of the 3rd International Workshop Gluten Proteins 69 May 1987, Budapest, pp. 314330.Google Scholar
Marshall, DR and Brown, AHD (1975) Optimum sampling strategies in genetic conservation. In: Franked, OH and Hawkes, JG (eds) Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5380.Google Scholar
McDermott, JM and McDonald, BA (1993) Gene flow in plant pathosystems. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31: 353373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, RA, Hart, GE and Gale, MD (1994) Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat (supplement). Annual Wheat Newsletter 40: 362375.Google Scholar
Nakamura, H (2000) Allelic variation at high molecular weight glutenin subunit loci, Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1, in Japanese and Chinese hexaploid wheats. Euphytica 112: 187193.Google Scholar
Nei, M (1972) Genetic distances between populations. The American Naturalist 106: 283292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 70: 33213323.Google Scholar
Nei, M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583590.Google Scholar
Nei, M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 176187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, T (1982) Linkage disequilibrium with the island model. Genetics 101: 139155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, PI (1987) Genetics of wheat storage protein and the effect of allelic variation on bread making quality. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 38: 141153.Google Scholar
Payne, PI and Lawrence, GJ (1983) Catalogue of alleles for the complex gene loci Glu-A1, Glu-B1, Glu-D1, which code for the high molecular weight subunits of glutenin in hexaploid wheat. Cereal Research Communication 11: 2935.Google Scholar
Payne, PI, Holt, LM and Law, CN (1981) Structural and genetical studies of the high molecular subunits of wheat glutenin. I. Allelic variation in subunits amongst varieties of wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 60: 229236.Google Scholar
Payne, PI, Roberts, MS and Holt, LM (1986) Locations of genes controlling the D group of LMW glutenin subunits on the chromosome 1D of bread wheat. Genetic Resources 47: 175179.Google Scholar
Porceddu, E, Ceoloni, C, Lafiandra, D, Tanzarella, OA and Mugnozza, GTS (1988) Genetic resources and plant breeding: problems and prospects. In: Proceeding 7th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, 13–19 July 1988, Cambridge, UK, pp. 722.Google Scholar
Sherwin, BW (2010) Entropy and information approaches to genetic diversity and its expression: genomic geography. Entropy 12: 17651798.Google Scholar
Smouse, PE and Ward, RH (1978) A comparison of the genetic infra-structure of the Ye'cuana and Yanomama: a likelihood analysis of genotypic variation among populations. Genetics 88: 611631.Google Scholar
Terasawa, Y, Kawahara, T, Sasakuma, T and Sasanuma, T (2009) Evaluation of the genetic diversity of an Afghan wheat collection based on morphological variation, HMW glutenin subunit polymorphisms, and AFLP. Breeding Sciences 59: 361371.Google Scholar
Terasawa, Y, Takara, K, Hirano, H, Kato, K, Kawahara, T, Saskuma, T and Sasanuma, T (2010) Genetic variation of high molecular weight glutenin subunit composition in Asian wheat. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 58: 283289.Google Scholar
Turchetta, T, Ciaffi, M, Porceddu, E and Lafiandra, D (1995) Relationship between electrophoretic pattern of storage proteins and gluten strength in durum wheat landraces from Turkey. Plant Breeding 114: 406412.Google Scholar
Van Hintum, TJL, Elings, A (1991) Assessment of glutenin and phenotypic diversity of Syrian durum wheat landraces in relation to their geographical origin. Euphytica 55: 209215.Google Scholar
Vavilov, NI (1951) The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. In: Selected writing of N.I. Vavilov, translated from the Russian by K. Starr Chester. Chronica Botanica 13: 1366.Google Scholar
Weir, B (1979) Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics 35: 235254.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. HMW gluten band profiles as a result of SDS-PAGE separation of Glu-1 locus of Turkish bread wheat landraces.

Figure 1

Table 1. Genetic diversity analyses; Ewens–Watterson neutrality test* and allele frequencies for Glu-1 locus

Figure 2

Table 2. Region-based genetic variation analyses of Glu-1 locus

Figure 3

Table 3. Genetic similarity (upper diagonal) and genetic distances (lower diagonal) in Glu-1 locus

Figure 4

Table 4. Multiple locus analysis in single populations and Hypothesis tests for observed values of K

Figure 5

Fig. 2. Regional dendogram for Glu-1 locus.

Supplementary material: File

Temizgul supplementary material

Table S1

Download Temizgul supplementary material(File)
File 20.6 KB