Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-t8hx9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T17:34:44.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Another bilingual advantage? Perception of talker-voice information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2017

SUSANNAH V. LEVI
SUSANNAH V. LEVI*
Affiliation:
New York University
*
Address for correspondence: Susannah Levi, New York University, Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, 665 Broadway, 9th floor, New York, NY 10012, svlevi@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A bilingual advantage has been found in both cognitive and social tasks. In the current study, we examine whether there is a bilingual advantage in how children process information about who is talking (talker-voice information). Younger and older groups of monolingual and bilingual children completed the following talker-voice tasks with bilingual speakers: a discrimination task in English and German (an unfamiliar language), and a talker-voice learning task in which they learned to identify the voices of three unfamiliar speakers in English. Results revealed effects of age and bilingual status. Across the tasks, older children performed better than younger children and bilingual children performed better than monolingual children. Improved talker-voice processing by the bilingual children suggests that a bilingual advantage exists in a social aspect of speech perception, where the focus is not on processing the linguistic information in the signal, but instead on processing information about who is talking.

Keywords

speech perceptiontalker processingbilinguals
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 523 - 536
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was supported by a grant from the NIH-NIDCD: 1R03DC009851-01A2. We would like to thank Jennifer Bruno, Emma Mack, Alexandra Muratore, Sydney Robert, and Margo Waltz for help with data collection, three anonymous reviewers for their extremely helpful comments, and the children and families for their participation.

References

Ansaldo, A. I., Ghazi-Saidi, L., & Adrover-Roig, D. (2015). Interference Control In Elderly Bilinguals: Appearances Can Be Misleading. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 37 (5), 455–470. doi:10.1080/13803395.2014.990359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arredondo, M. M., Hu, X.-S., Satterfield, T., & Kovelman, I. (2015). Bilingualism alters children's frontal lobe functioning for attentional control. Developmental Science, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/desc.12377Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.Google Scholar
Bartholomeus, B. (1973). Voice identification by nursery school children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27 (4), 464–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2010). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 Retrieved from http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70 (3), 636–644.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19 (2), 290–303. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. M. (2004). Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 7 (3), 325–339. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00351.xGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106 (2), 707–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. i. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101 (4), 2299–2310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bregman, M. R., & Creel, S. C. (2014). Gradient language dominance affects talker learning. Cognition, 130 (1), 85–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.010Google Scholar
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (1997). TONI-3: Test of nonverbal intelligence (third edition). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Buac, M., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2014). The relationship between linguistic and non-linguistic cognitive controll skills in bilingual children from low socio-economic backgrounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–12.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11 (2), 282–298. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00675.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects. Language and Speech, 47 (3), 207–239.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106 (1), 59–86.Google Scholar
Creel, S. C., & Jimenez, S. R. (2012). Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 487–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A., Andics, A., & Fang, Z. (2011). Inter-dependent categorization of voices and segments. In Lee, W.-S. & Zee, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 552–555). Hong Kong: Department of Chinese, Translation, and Linguistics, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
de Bruin, A., Treccani, B., & Della Sala, S. (2015). Cognitive Advantage in Bilingualism: An Example of Publication Bias? Psychological Science, 26 (1), 99–107. doi:10.1177/0956797614557866Google Scholar
DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science, 208, 1174–1176.Google Scholar
DeCasper, A. J., & Prescott, P. A. (1984). Human newborn's perception of male voices: Preference, discrimination, and reinforcing value. Developmental Psychology, 17 (5), 481–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ensminger, M. E., & Fothergill, K. E. (2003). A decade of measuring SES: What it tells us and where to go from here. In Bornstein, M. H. & Bradley, R. H. (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, Parenting, and Child Development (pp. 13–27). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fan, S. P., Liberman, Z., Keysar, B., & Kinzler, K. D. (2015). The Exposure Advantage: Early Exposure to a Multilingual Environment Promotes Effective Communication. Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0956797615574699Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, D., Giordano, B. L., Caldara, R., & Belin, P. (2014). A language-familiarity effect for speaker discrimination without comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (38), 13795–13798. doi:10.1073/pnas.1401383111Google Scholar
Friesen, D. C., Latman, V., Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E. (2015). Attention during visual search: The benefit of bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19 (6), 693–702. doi:10.1177/1367006914534331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goggin, J. P., Thompson, C. P., Strube, G., & Simental, L. R. (1991). The role of language familiarity in voice identification. Memory & Cognition, 19 (5), 448–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, B. T., Kim, C., Johnson, N. F., Kryscio, R. J., & Smith, C. D. (2013). Lifelong bilingualism maintains neural efficiency for cognitive control in aging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33 (2), 387–396. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3837-12.2013Google Scholar
Goldstein, A. G., Knight, P., Bailis, K., & Conover, J. (1981). Recognition memory for accented and unaccented voices. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17 (5), 217– 220.Google Scholar
Green, K. P., Tomiak, G. R., & Kuhl, P. K. (1997). The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 59 (5), 675–692.Google Scholar
Greenberg, A., Bellana, B., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Perspective-taking ability in bilingual children: Extending advantages in executive control to spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development, 28 (1), 41–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.10.002Google Scholar
Hamers, J. F., & Blanc, M. (2000). Bilinguality and bilingualism: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hollien, H., Majewski, W., & Doherty, E. T. (1982). Perceptual identification of voices under normal, stress, and disguise speaking conditions. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 139–148.Google Scholar
Incera, S., & McLennan, C. T. (2015). Mouse tracking reveals that bilinguals behave like experts. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, FirstView, 1–11. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000218Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. K., Westrek, E., Nazzi, T., & Cutler, A. (2011). Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience. Developmental Science, 14 (5), 1002–1011.Google Scholar
Kerstholt, J. H., Jansen, N. J. M., Van Amelsvoort, A. G., & Broeders, A. P. A. (2006). Earwitnesses: effects of accent, retention and telephone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20 (2), 187–197. doi:10.1002/acp.1175Google Scholar
Kisilevsky, B. S., Hains, S. M. J., Lee, K., Xie, S., Huang, H., Ye, H. H., Zhang, K., & Wang, Z. (2003). Effects of experience on fetal voice recognition. Psychological Science, 14 (3), 220–224.Google Scholar
Köster, O., & Schiller, N. O. (1997). Different influences of the native language of a listener on speaker recognition. Forensic Linguistics, 4, 18–28.Google Scholar
Krizman, J., Marian, V., Shook, A., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (20), 7877–7881. doi:10.1073/pnas.1201575109Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the “Perceptual Magnet Effect”. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 121–154). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Levi, S. V. (2014). Individual differences in learning talker categories: The role of working memory. Phonetica, 71 (3), 201–226.Google Scholar
Levi, S. V., & Schwartz, R. G. (2013). The development of language-specific and language-independent talker processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 913–920.Google Scholar
Levi, S. V. (2015). Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children. Journal of Child Language, 42 (4), 843–872.Google Scholar
Levi, S. V., Winters, S. J., & Pisoni, D. B. (2007). Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 2327–2338.Google Scholar
Levi, S. V., Winters, S. J., & Pisoni, D. B. (2011). Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: Whose familiar voices are more intelligible? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130 (6), 4053–4062.Google Scholar
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89 (2), 874–886.Google Scholar
Mann, V. A., Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1979). Development of voice recognition: Parallels with face recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 153–165.Google Scholar
Moher, M., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2010). A one-to-one bias and fast mapping support preschoolers’ learning about faces and voices. Cognitive Science, 34 (5), 719–751.Google Scholar
Mullennix, J. W., & Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 47 (4), 379–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60 (3), 355–376.Google Scholar
Orena, A. J., Theodore, R. M., & Polka, L. (2015). Language exposure facilitates talker learning prior to language comprehension, even in adults. Cognition, 143, 36–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.002Google Scholar
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66 (2), 232–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2014). Are bilingual advantages dependent upon specific tasks or specific bilingual experiences? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26 (6), 615–639. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.944914Google Scholar
Paap, K. R., & Sawi, O. (2014). Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00962Google Scholar
Paap, K. R., Sawi, O. M., Dalibar, C., Darrow, J., & Johnson, H. A. (2014). The Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Cognitive Benefits of Bilingualism may be Extraordinarily Difficult to Discover. AIMS Neuroscience, 1 (3), 245–256. doi:https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.3.245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrachione, T. K., Chiao, J. Y., & Wong, P. C. M. (2010). Asymmetric cultural effects on perceptual expertise underlie an own-race bias for voices. Cognition, 114 (1), 42–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.012Google Scholar
Perrachione, T. K., Del Tufo, S. N., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2011). Human voice recognition depends on language ability. Science, 333, 595.Google Scholar
Perrachione, T. K., Dougherty, S. C., McLaughlin, D. E., & Lember, R. A. (2015). The effects of speech perception and speech comprehension on talker identification Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Perrachione, T. K., & Wong, P. C. M. (2007). Learning to recognize speakers of a non-native language: Implications for the functional organization of human auditory cortex. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1899–1910.Google Scholar
Purhonen, M., Kilpeläinen-Lees, R., Valkonen-Korhonen, M., Karhu, J., & Lehtonen, J. (2004). Cerebral processing of mother's voice compared to unfamiliar voice in 4-month-old infants. International Jornal of Psycholphysiology, 52, 257–266.Google Scholar
Purhonen, M., Kilpeläinen-Lees, R., Valkonen-Korhonen, M., Karhu, J., & Lehtonen, J. (2005). Four-month-old infants process own mother's voice faster than unfamiliar voices - Electrical signs of sensitization in infant brain. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 627–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saidi, L. G., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2015). Can a Second Language Help You in More Ways Than One? AIMS Neuroscience, 2 (1), 52–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2015.1.52Google Scholar
Schiller, N. O., & Köster, O. (1996). Evaluation of a foreign speaker in forensic phonetics: a report. Forensic Linguistics, 3 (1), 176–185.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2007). E-Prime 2.0 Professional. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.Google Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals, fourth edition (CELF-4). Toronto, CA: The Psychological Corporation/A Harcourt Assessment Company.Google Scholar
Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125 (5), 3306–3316.Google Scholar
Spence, M. J., Rollins, P. R., & Jerger, S. (2002). Children's recognition of cartoon voices. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 45 (1), 214–222.Google Scholar
Stevenage, S. V., Clarke, G., & McNeill, A. (2012). The “other-accent” effect in voice recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24 (6), 647–653. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.675321Google Scholar
Strange, W. (2006). Second‐language speech perception: The modification of automatic selective perceptual routines. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 3137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.Google Scholar
Sullivan, K. P. H., & Schlichting, F. (2000). Speaker discrimination in a foreign language: first language environment, second language learners. Forensic Linguistics, 17 (1), 95–111.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. P. (1987). A language effect in voice identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1 (2), 121–131.Google Scholar
Van Dommelen, W. A. (1987). The Contribution of Speech Rhythm and Pitch to Speaker Recognition. Language and Speech, 30 (4), 325–338. doi:10.1177/002383098703000403Google Scholar
Winters, S. J., Levi, S. V., & Pisoni, D. B. (2008). Identification and discrimination of bilingual talkers across languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123 (6), 4524–4538.Google Scholar
Xie, X., & Myers, E. (2015). The impact of musical training and tone language experience on talker identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137 (1), 419–432.Google Scholar
Zarate, J. M., Tian, X., Woods, K. J. P., & Poeppel, D. (2015). Multiple levels of linguistic and paralinguistic featres contribute to voice recognition. Scientific Reports, 5: 11475. doi:10.1038/srep11475Google Scholar