Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-09T12:58:28.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First record of the Indian meal moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) at a research station in Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2022

Paulo E.A.S. Câmara*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
Peter Convey
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa
Vinícius Alves Ferreira
Affiliation:
Agronômica, Laboratório de Diagnóstico Fitossanitário e Consultoria, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Pedro Henrique Brum Togni
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil
José Roberto Pujol-Luz
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report the first formal record of the Indian meal moth Plodia interpunctella from a location within the Antarctic Treaty area, with the capture of a live adult male within the Brazilian Comandante Ferraz research station on King George Island, South Shetland Islands. This species is a well-known pest of stored products and is widely recorded in synanthropic situations such as food stores globally. No other adults or immature stages have been observed on the station. While there is no suggestion that P. interpunctella could survive or establish in the natural environment beyond the station, this observation highlights the ever-present threat of unintended anthropogenically assisted transfer of non-Antarctic species into human facilities on the continent, with some such species proving extremely difficult to eradicate if they successfully establish within these facilities.

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antarctic Science Ltd

Introduction

Antarctica, considered under the Antarctic Treaty as all land and ocean south of the 60°S latitude parallel, houses some of the most pristine environments on Earth. The continent's ecosystems are characterized by some of the most extreme environmental conditions globally (Convey et al. Reference Convey, Chown, Clarke, Barnes, Cummings and Ducklow2014, Convey Reference Convey and Levin2017). Along with the continent's geographical isolation, such conditions act as environmental filters preventing most organisms from colonizing and becoming established. Antarctica's native terrestrial diversity is relatively poor (Convey Reference Convey and Levin2017). Only two native flowering plants are present, with vegetation primarily consisting of mosses and lichens, along with microbiota (Ochyra et al. Reference Ochyra, Lewis Smith and Bednarek-Ochyra2008, Carvalho-Silva et al. Reference Carvalho-Silva, Rosa, Pinto, Da Silva, Henriques, Convey and Câmara2021). Similarly, the terrestrial fauna comprises primarily micro-arthropods (mites and springtails) and micro-invertebrates and includes only two native insects: the chironomid midges Parochlus steinenii (Gerke 1889) and Belgica antarctica Jacobs, 1900, both restricted to the Maritime Antarctic (Convey & Block Reference Convey and Block1996).

The Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Arc experienced the most dramatic warming in air temperature in Antarctica in the second half of the twentieth century (Turner et al. Reference Turner, Bindschadler, Convey, di Prisco, Fahrbach and Gutt2009). Since the turn of the century, this warming has paused and even reversed for a short period (Turner et al. Reference Turner, Lu, White, Phillips, Hosking and Bracegirdle2016), but climate modelling predicts a resumption of the rapid warming through the remainder of the twenty-first century (Bracegirdle et al. Reference Bracegirdle, Krinner, Tonelli, Haumann, Naughten and Rackow2020).

King George Island (KGI) is the largest of the South Shetland Islands (Fig. 1) with an area of 1150 km2. It has a cold oceanic climate and an average annual temperature of -1.88°C to -1.68°C and a relative humidity of 89%, with three to four summer months typically having low positive monthly mean air temperatures. KGI is highly impacted by human presence, hosting national research stations representing nine countries (Argentina, Chile, China, Brazil, Peru, Poland, Russia, South Korea and Uruguay) and an aerodrome, as well as being visited by tourists.

Fig. 1. a. Location of the South Shetland Islands indicated by the red square. b. The newly constructed Brazilian Comandante Ferraz research station on the Keller Peninsula, Admiralty Bay, King George Island.

One of the most concerning threats to Antarctic ecosystems and biodiversity, as is the case globally (Pyšek et al. Reference Pyšek, Hulme, Simberloff, Bacher, Blackburn and Carlton2020), is the introduction through anthropogenic assistance of new species (potentially including some providing new ecological functions) that may be able to become established in the region, with unknown and unpredicted consequences for the native biota (Frenot et al. Reference Frenot, Chown, Whinam, Selkirk, Convey, Skotnicki and Bergstrom2005, Amesbury et al. Reference Amesbury, Roland, Royles, Hodgson, Convey, Griffiths and Charman2017, Robinson et al. Reference Robinson, King, Bramley-Alves, Waterman, Ashcroft and Wasley2018, Convey & Peck Reference Convey and Peck2019). Many examples of this already exist in the sub-Antarctic, with increasing numbers of records becoming available from the Maritime Antarctic (Frenot et al. Reference Frenot, Chown, Whinam, Selkirk, Convey, Skotnicki and Bergstrom2005, Hughes et al. Reference Hughes, Pertierra, Molina-Montenegro and Convey2015). Some of these were clearly able to become established in parts of Antarctica under pre-warming or current conditions, but the predicted continued warming is likely to act in synergy with increasing levels of human activity to increase the risks of both transfer events and successful establishment (Convey & Peck Reference Convey and Peck2019). It is also pertinent to note that, in the entire history of human contact with the Antarctic continent (one to two centuries) and the sub-Antarctic (two to three centuries), there are either no (continent) or a tiny proportion (sub-Antarctic; two of > 200 known species) of proposed instances of natural (non-human-assisted) dispersal and colonization events.

During the 2021/2022 summer, a microlepidopteran was captured inside a kitchen in the newly built Comandante Ferraz research station on KGI (Fig. 1). Here, we report the first record of Plodia interpunctella (Hübner, 1813) in Antarctica.

Methods

Specimen capture and identification

A single microlepidopteran specimen was observed within a kitchen in Comandante Ferraz research station (62°05′07″S, 58°23′29″W) on 13 November 2021 and captured using a Falcon tube. The individual was frozen at Ferraz and transported to the University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil. Supplies to Ferraz are primarily transported by Brazilian navy vessels from the cities of Rio de Janeiro and Rio Grande. The station also receives cargo originating in Chile (Punta Arenas), and it has therefore not been possible to ascertain the specimen's origin. No direct evidence of the presence of adult moths or larvae has been apparent in the station's stored foods.

In preparation for dissection of its genitalia, the insect's abdomen was removed and placed in a vial containing 10% KOH solution, which was kept in a water bath at 50°C for 45 min. The abdomen was then washed in water and cleaned with a fine brush to remove the scales and other debris. After cleaning, the genitalia were removed and dehydrated in 90% ethanol. The genitalia were soaked in clove oil for 2 h and then mounted on a blade in Hoyer's medium for subsequent examination.

P. interpunctella (Hübner) (Pyralidae) can be identified by the striking bicoloured pattern of the hindwings in living adults. The forewings of living specimens have lighter grey or tan colouration in the basal part and darker reddish-brown colouration in the apical part. Amongst stored product pest species, it is the only moth species that has pink or red copper scales on the hindwings (Fig. 2; Gorham Reference Gorham1991). In the absence of scales on the wing in worn specimens, the species can be differentiated from other moths of the subfamily Phycitinae by the forward-facing labial palps, small differences in the venation of the forewing and the presence of tufts of scales in the head region (Richards & Thompson Reference Richards and Thomson1932).

Fig. 2. Plodia interpunctella: a. male genitalia, b. wing scales and c. habitus (dorsal view).

Results

Our specimen is a male and the morphology of the male genitalia is a diagnostic character of the species (Fig. 2). P. interpunctella differs from closely related species such as Ephestia kuehniella Zeller by the presence of an apical thorn on the valve rim (Richards & Thompson Reference Richards and Thomson1932).

Discussion

Insects feature highly amongst records of biological invasions in part due to the risk and ease of unnoticed transportation of individuals in stored foodstuffs (Liebhold & Tobin Reference Liebhold and Tobin2008). Microlepidoptera are amongst the most important pests of stored products. Among these, E. kuehniella Zeller, 1879 (Pyralidae) has been reported to have been accidentally transported on fresh foods to the Polish Arctowski station on KGI (Chwedorzewska et al. Reference Chwedorzewska, Korczak-Abshire, Olech, Lityńska-Zając and Augustyniuk-Kram2012). Many Lepidoptera can also disperse widely as part of their natural behaviour. Convey (Reference Convey2005) reported records of three potentially invasive Lepidoptera from sub-Antarctic South Georgia, including the migratory species Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel, 1766) (Noctuidae) and Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758) (Yponomeutidae) and the food pest P. interpunctella (Pyralidae). P. xylostella is already established on sub-Antarctic Marion Island (Chown & Language Reference Chown and Language1994). Living moths may also be accidentally transported into Antarctica as ‘passengers‘ on vessels, to which they are easily attracted by the ships' lights, as recorded for the noctuids Peridroma saucia (Hübner, 1808) and Pseudaletia adultera (Schaus, 1894) (Barnes & Convey Reference Barnes and Convey2005). Here, we have confirmed the first formal record of P. interpunctella from any location within the Antarctic Treaty area.

P. interpunctella is cosmopolitan, being present on every continent except Antarctica (Mohandass et al. Reference Mohandass, Arthur, Zhu and Throne2007). It is commonly associated with synanthropic food storage environments and is considered a storage pest of a wide variety of grains, flours, nuts, cereals and processed foods (Rees Reference Rees2004, Mohandass et al. Reference Mohandass, Arthur, Zhu and Throne2007). It is thought to have originated from India and its global dispersal has been facilitated by the transport of grains and other stored foods where its larvae develop (Mohandass et al. Reference Mohandass, Arthur, Zhu and Throne2007). While being associated with food storage areas globally, it is generally not considered one of the most serious such pests (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Wofford and Whitehand1992, Mohandass et al. Reference Mohandass, Arthur, Zhu and Throne2007).

The life cycle of P. interpunctella is directly influenced by temperature. Under experimental conditions, optimal larval development and adult reproduction occur at between 20°C and 27°C (Defilippo et al. Reference Defilippo, Grisendi, Savoldelli, Torri, Dottori and Bonilauri2019). The minimum temperature threshold for development ranges from 16°C to 20°C, depending on diet, rearing conditions and geographical origin of the populations (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Wofford and Whitehand1992, Mohandass et al. Reference Mohandass, Arthur, Zhu and Throne2007, Defilippo et al. Reference Defilippo, Grisendi, Savoldelli, Torri, Dottori and Bonilauri2019). The insect can enter diapause, normally during the fifth larval instar, triggered by a combination of reducing photoperiod and temperature (Tzanakakis Reference Tzanakakis1959). This diapause is usually ended when temperature conditions return to the minimum required for development (Wijayaratne & Fields Reference Wijayaratne and Fields2012). At low environmental temperatures, as found in the sub-Antarctic, there is no evidence that individuals can develop or survive outside human settlements (Convey Reference Convey2005). Experimental exposure of larvae or eggs at temperatures between 0°C and -10°C for 24 h provides an effective control measure and causes 100% mortality (Oh et al. Reference Oh, Kim, Lee, Park, Kim, Na and Kim2022).

To our knowledge, this is the first report of P. interpunctella in Antarctica. Given its physiological temperature requirements, it is highly likely only to be capable of survival in synanthropic environments (i.e. within built and heated structures) in Antarctica, and there is no evidence that individuals can survive in the natural environment. However, although not reported commonly in the scientific literature, a number of examples exist of insect species being transported to and in some cases establishing synanthropically within research stations in Antarctica, where they can prove difficult or as yet impossible to eradicate (Hughes et al. Reference Hughes, Walsh, Convey, Richards and Bergstrom2005, Remedios-De León et al. Reference Remedios-De León, Hughes, Morelli and Convey2021). It is possible that some species, such as the fly Trichocera maculipennis Meigen, 1818 (Trichoceridae), have been capable of moving from the synanthropic to the natural environment (Remedios-De León et al. Reference Remedios-De León, Hughes, Morelli and Convey2021). Hence, even the synanthropic presence of new non-native species in Antarctica is a matter of concern. We suggest that the application of more rigorous control measures (e.g. freezing stored products for 24 h) should be employed to prevent the transportation and establishment of P. interpunctella and other similar species in human facilities on the Antarctic continent.

Acknowledgements

This study received financial support from CNPq and PROANTAR. P. Convey is supported by NERC core funding to the BAS ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ Team. Thanks are also given to congresswoman Jô Moraes, the Biological Sciences Institute at University of Brasília, the Brazilian Navy and two anonymous reviewers for their feedback.

Author contributions

PEASC performed fieldwork and collecting samples. PC, VAF, PHBT and JRPL performed the identification and dissecting. PEASC, PC and JRPL wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the final version.

References

Amesbury, M.J., Roland, T.P., Royles, J., Hodgson, D.A., Convey, P., Griffiths, H. & Charman, D.J. 2017. Widespread biological response to rapid warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. Current Biology, 27, 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, D.K.A. & Convey, P. 2005. Odyssey of stow-away noctuid moths to southern polar islands. Antarctic Science, 17, 10.1017/S0954102005002737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracegirdle, T.J., Krinner, G., Tonelli, M., Haumann, F.A., Naughten, K.A., Rackow, T., et al. 2020. Twenty first century changes in Antarctic and Southern Ocean surface climate in CMIP6. Atmospheric Science Letters, 21, 10.1002/asl.984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho-Silva, M., Rosa, L., Pinto, O., Da Silva, T., Henriques, D., Convey, P. & Câmara, P. 2021. Exploring the plant environmental DNA diversity in soil from two sites on Deception Island (Antarctica, South Shetland Islands) using metabarcoding. Antarctic Science, 33, 10.1017/S0954102021000274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chown, S.L. & Language, K. 1994. Recently established Diptera and Lepidoptera on sub-Antarctic Marion Island. African Entomology, 2, 5760.Google Scholar
Chwedorzewska, K., Korczak-Abshire, M., Olech, M., Lityńska-Zając, M. & Augustyniuk-Kram, A. 2012. Alien invertebrates transported accidentally to the Polish Antarctic Station in cargo and on fresh foods. Polish Polar Research, 34, 10.2478/popore-2013-0005.Google Scholar
Convey, P. 2005. Recent lepidopteran records from sub-Antarctic South Georgia. Polar Biology, 28, 10.1007/s00300-004-0681-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P. 2017. Antarctic ecosystems. In Levin, S.A., ed. Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 179187.Google Scholar
Convey, P. & Block, W. 1996. Antarctic Diptera: ecology, physiology and distribution. European Journal of Entomology, 93, 113.Google Scholar
Convey, P. & Peck, L.S. 2019. Antarctic environmental change and biological responses. Science Advances, 11, eaaz0888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P., Chown, S.L., Clarke, A., Barnes, D.K.A., Cummings, V., Ducklow, H., et al. 2014. The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity. Ecological Monographs, 84, 10.1890/12-2216.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defilippo, F., Grisendi, A., Savoldelli, S., Torri, D., Dottori, M. & Bonilauri, P. 2019. Effect of temperature and diet on Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) development with special reference to Isomegalen diagram and accumulated degree days. Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research, 51, 10.4081/jear.2019.7855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenot, Y., Chown, S.L., Whinam, J., Selkirk, P.M., Convey, P., Skotnicki, M. & Bergstrom, D.M. 2005. Biological invasions in the Antarctic: extent, impacts and implications. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 80, 10.1017/S1464793104006542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorham, J.R. 1991. Insect and mite pests in food: an illustrated key (Vol. 655). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 319 pp.Google Scholar
Hughes, K.A., Pertierra, L.R., Molina-Montenegro, M.A. & Convey, P. 2015. Biological invasions in Antarctica: what is the current status and can we respond? Biodiversity and Conservation, 24, 10.1007/s10531-015-0896-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, K.A., Walsh, S., Convey, P., Richards, S. & Bergstrom, D. 2005. Alien fly populations established at two Antarctic research stations. Polar Biology, 28, 10.1007/s00300-005-0720-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.A., Wofford, P.L. & Whitehand, L.C. 1992. Effect of diet and temperature on development rates, survival, and reproduction of the Indian meal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 85, 10.1093/jee/85.2.561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebhold, A.M. & Tobin, P.C. 2008. Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annual Review of Entomology, 53, 387–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohandass, S., Arthur, F.H., Zhu, K.Y. & Throne, J.E. 2007. Biology and management of Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in stored products. Journal of Stored Products Research, 43, 10.1016/j.jspr.2006.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochyra, R., Lewis Smith, R.I. & Bednarek-Ochyra, H. 2008. The illustrated moss flora of Antarctica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 704 pp.Google Scholar
Oh, S.H., Kim, B.H., Lee, Y.J., Park, S.J., Kim, B.I., Na, J.H. & Kim, W. 2022. Comparative study of freezing time and temperature for effective Plodia interpunctella control using typical storage containers. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 25, 10.1016/j.aspen.2022.101868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyšek, P., Hulme, P.E., Simberloff, D., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T.M., Carlton, J.T., et al. 2020. Scientists' warning on invasive alien species. Biological Reviews, 95, 10.1111/brv.12627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rees, D. 2004. Insects of stored products. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing, 181 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remedios-De León, M., Hughes, K.A., Morelli, E. & Convey, P. 2021. Establishment of a non-native fly in Antarctica: international response and implications for future policy under the Antarctic Treaty System. Environmental Management, 67, 10.1007/s00267-021-01464-z.Google Scholar
Richards, O.W. & Thomson, W.S. 1932. A contribution to the study of the genera Ephestia, Gn. (including Strymax, Dyar), and Plodia, Gn. (Lepidoptera, Phyeitidae), with notes on parasites of the larvae. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 80, 169250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S.A., King, D.H., Bramley-Alves, J., Waterman, M.J., Ashcroft, M.B., Wasley, J., et al. 2018. Rapid change in East Antarctic terrestrial vegetation in response to regional drying. Nature Climate Change, 8, 10.1038/s4155 8-018-0280-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J., Bindschadler, R., Convey, P., di Prisco, G., Fahrbach, E., Gutt, J., et al. , eds. 2009. Antarctic climate change and the environment. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, 555 pp.Google Scholar
Turner, J., Lu, H., White, I., Phillips, T., Hosking, J.S., Bracegirdle, T.J., et al. 2016. Absence of 21st century warming on Antarctic Peninsula consistent with natural variability. Nature, 535, 10.1038/nature18645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tzanakakis, M.E. 1959. An ecological study of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella, with emphasis on diapause. Hilgardia, 29, 10.3733/hilg.v29n05p205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijayaratne, L.K.W. & Fields, P.G. 2012. Effects of rearing conditions, geographical origin, and selection on larval diapause in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Journal of Insect Science, 12, 10.1673/031.012.11901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. a. Location of the South Shetland Islands indicated by the red square. b. The newly constructed Brazilian Comandante Ferraz research station on the Keller Peninsula, Admiralty Bay, King George Island.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Plodia interpunctella: a. male genitalia, b. wing scales and c.habitus (dorsal view).