Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:36:42.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Irregular recruitment of the echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus and its implications for biological traits analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2020

Richard M. Warwick*
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, West Hoe, PlymouthPL1 3DH, UK Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, Western Australia6150, Australia
Bryony Pearce
Affiliation:
Pelagica Limited, 2 School House Cottage, Market Street, Hoylake, WirralCH47 3EP, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Richard M. Warwick, E-mail: rmw@pml.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Size-frequency analysis of the echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus from six offshore areas in the southern North Sea and eastern English Channel reveal five distinct cohorts, suggesting a lifespan of five years. In all six individual areas one or more year-groups are absent, due to the unsuccessful recruitment of planktonic larvae to the seabed in some years, giving a false impression of a shorter lifespan. A relatively long lifespan and planktotrophic larval development are remarkable for such a small species, which reaches a maximum test length of 7.3 mm in the area, such traits being more typical of large-sized macrobenthic species. The feeding mode is akin to that of many meiobenthic taxa. The architecture of the test confers exceptional strength and resilience to mechanical perturbation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Introduction

Biological trait-based approaches are increasingly being adopted as a tool by which to explore changes in ecosystem functioning (Bremner et al., Reference Bremner, Frid and Rogers2003a, Reference Bremner, Rogers and Frid2003b; Degen et al., Reference Degen, Aune, Bluhm, Cassidy, Kedra, Kraan, Vandepitte, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, Zhulay, Albano, Bremner, Grebmeier, Link, Morata, Nordström, Shojaei, Sutton and Zuschin2018). Morphological, life history and behavioural traits can be used to investigate ecosystem functions and properties such as energy and nutrient cycling, production, resilience and heterogeneity (Degen et al., Reference Degen, Aune, Bluhm, Cassidy, Kedra, Kraan, Vandepitte, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, Zhulay, Albano, Bremner, Grebmeier, Link, Morata, Nordström, Shojaei, Sutton and Zuschin2018). However, extensive gaps still exist in our knowledge of the natural history of species even for well-documented faunas such as the marine benthos of the UK (Tyler et al., Reference Tyler, Somerfield, Vanden Berghe, Bremner, Jackson, Langmead, Palomares and Webb2012), and it is often necessary to resort to the application of generalized relationships, such as that between body size and age (e.g. Marine Ecological Surveys Limited, 2007) or reproductive mode (Strathmann & Strathmann, Reference Strathmann and Strathmann1982), even though in specific cases these may be misleading. Echinocyamus pusillus (O.F. Müller, 1776) is one such example.

Echinocyamus pusillus is a very small sea urchin with an oval, flattened body typically only 1 cm in length (Picton & Morrow, Reference Picton and Morrow2016), although reported to reach a maximum of 15 mm (Hayward & Ryland, Reference Hayward and Ryland1990). It is common all around the British Isles and is found from the extremely low intertidal to sublittoral depths of more than 200 m (Southward & Campbell, Reference Southward and Campbell2006). It has a preference for medium to coarse-grained sand (median grain size >200 μm) and reaches maximum densities in sediments with a median grain size of 500‒550 μm, preferring sediments with a low mud content (maximum 10%) (Degraer et al., Reference Degraer, Wittoeck, Appeltans, Cooreman, Deprez, Hillewaert, Hostens, Mees, Vanden Berghe and Vincx2006). Being a very small species in very coarse sediments, its occurrence may be under-recorded due to its inconspicuousness and the methodological problems of its extraction from the sediment. The test is completely covered with fine short spines and is coloured grey to greenish, becoming completely green when injured (Southward & Campbell, Reference Southward and Campbell2006). The calcite test has extraordinary structural strength and skeletal integrity within the echinoids, due to the absence of supportive collagenous fibres between single plates and an internal buttress system (Grun & Nebelsick, Reference Grun and Nebelsick2018). This provides the species with exceptional resilience to physical abrasion in coarse sediments that are often unstable and mobile. Since the coarse sands and gravels which E. pusillus inhabits are often the target for aggregate dredging by the construction industry, the species resilience to physical abrasion is likely to be crucial to its continued persistence in these areas (Marine Ecological Surveys Limited, 2007).The high preservation potential of the tests is also responsible for their frequent occurrence in both recent and fossil (Pliocene) death assemblages.

Despite its small size, E. pusillus has a planktotrophic larval phase in its life history. It has separate sexes and fertilization takes place externally. The breeding season is in the summer months and the echinoplutei are found in the plankton from summer to autumn (Southward & Campbell, Reference Southward and Campbell2006).

Echinocyamus pusillus is a deposit-feeder, its gut content including sediment, remains of plants and bottom material (detritus), and infauna, especially foraminiferans, and E. pusillus itself is eaten by fish, especially by dab and haddock (Mortensen, Reference Mortensen1927; de Ridder & Lawrence, Reference de Ridder, Lawrence, Jangoux and Lawrence1982; Eleftheriou & Basford, Reference Eleftheriou and Basford1989; Schückel et al., Reference Schückel, Ehrich, Kröncke and Reiss2010). Haddock show a strong preferential prey selection for E. pusillus in the North Sea, which may be effective as a grinding element in their stomach, enhancing digestion due to its hard calcareous shell and compensating for the low nutritional value of their benthic prey (Schückel et al., Reference Schückel, Ehrich, Kröncke and Reiss2010).

The objective of this study is to establish some of the major life history traits relating to the function of this species, in particular its lifespan or time taken to reach maximum size, which can be established by cohort growth analysis.

Materials and methods

Quantitative samples of Echinocyamus pusillus were collected at six offshore sites licensed for aggregate extraction in the southern North Sea and eastern English Channel (Figure 1, Table 1) in May and June 2005 as part of a broader research programme investigating the ability of benthic communities to recover from aggregate extraction (Marine Ecological Surveys Limited, 2007). The bottom sediments comprised coarse mixtures of sand and gravel, occasionally with a small mud component, and water depths ranged from 18‒49 m (Table 1). Ten 0.1 m2 Hamon grab samples of sediment were taken randomly within each site, sieved over a 0.5 mm mesh sieve, gently eluted to remove excess fine sediment and preserved in formalin for further separation and analysis in the laboratory. Test-length measurements to the nearest 0.1 mm were made under a binocular microscope using an eyepiece graticule calibrated with a stage micrometer. Size-frequency analysis requires a reasonably large number of specimens, and all specimens from all 10 samples taken from a particular area have been combined to establish the size-frequency distribution. Areas where less than 20 specimens were recorded, across the 10 samples, have been excluded from this analysis.

Fig. 1. Map of SE England showing locations of the six sampling areas. Inset: photograph of a living specimen of Echinocyamus pusillus.

Table 1. Sediment composition in sampling areas as Folk classification categories (Folk, Reference Folk1954), with sampling date in 2005 and water depth (m)

Number of grab samples comprising each sediment type in parentheses.

Several computer packages such as ELEFAN, SLCA, MULTIFAN and MULTIFAN-CL are available to identify modes in size-frequency distributions (see Van der Meer et al., Reference Van der Meer, Brey, Heip, Herman, Moens, van Oevelen and Eleftheriou2013 and references therein) but these are based on the assumption that the sizes in each age class are normally distributed, which is intuitively invalid. If recruitment occurs over a period of time and the recruits then begin to grow and suffer mortality then we would expect a right-skewed size distribution for that cohort (i.e. with the mode to the left of the distribution). In practice, if cohorts are clear they can be identified by eye without the need for computationally cumbersome techniques, and this approach has been adopted here. A further problem arises when attempting to estimate the number of year classes in the population in that the local recruitment of many benthic species is erratic (see e.g. Buchanan & Warwick, Reference Buchanan and Warwick1974) and in some years may be particularly strong while in others it may be weak or there may be a complete recruitment failure.

Results

Figure 2 shows that, for all areas combined, there are clearly five cohorts present, giving a maximum age of five years. The smallest cohort, with a modal length of 1.5 mm, can be assumed to be almost one year old, since samples were collected in May/June and spawning and planktonic larval development takes place in the summer‒autumn (Southward & Campbell, Reference Southward and Campbell2006). The maximum length attained is just 7.3 mm, at Area 461. Clearly, the five cohorts are not all well represented in all areas and interpretation of the data from one area alone could be quite misleading. In Area 461 there appears to be a single cohort of large animals which would suggest an annual species with a rapid growth rate. Size-frequency data from Areas 452 and 460 would be interpreted as having 2 cohorts (but these are not of equal size in the two areas), with a lifespan of two years. Areas 458 and 483 would be interpreted as having three cohorts, with a lifespan of three years, whilst data from Area 430 are more difficult to interpret but suggest a lifespan of at least two years.

Fig. 2. Size-frequency histograms of Echinocyamus pusillus test length in the six individual areas and in all areas combined.

Discussion

In the present study size-frequency distributions have only been established for a single point in time and so the annual nature of the size modes is equivocal. However, cohort growth analysis has been widely used in field programmes directed towards the estimation of annual production of marine benthic macrofaunal species in UK waters (Buchanan & Warwick, Reference Buchanan and Warwick1974; Warwick & Price, Reference Warwick and Price1975; Warwick et al., Reference Warwick, George and Davies1978; Price & Warwick, Reference Price and Warwick1980; Warwick & George, Reference Warwick, George, Collins, Banner, Tyler, Wakefield and James1980; George & Warwick, Reference George and Warwick1985). Such studies typically result in a time series of size-frequency distributions, from which the demographic parameters of recruitment, growth rates and mortality rates can be derived (Crisp, Reference Crisp, Holme and McIntyre1984; Van der Meer et al., Reference Van der Meer, Brey, Heip, Herman, Moens, van Oevelen and Eleftheriou2013). A time series of size-frequency distributions is used to follow the progression of size-modes over time so that it is possible to determine whether the size modes are annual or not, since it is conceivable that modes could result from a series of discrete spawnings over time periods shorter than a year, or annual modes might be missing due to recruitment failure. Thus, if a species is only present in one or two areas, the data must be interpreted with caution since the size modes may not represent successive years. However, in all the studies of benthic species cited above these size modes have proved to be annual, and therefore this is assumed to be the case for Echinocyamus pusillus.

This analysis is predicated on the assumption that the settlement timing and post-settlement growth rates are similar in all areas. The composition of each size cohort in the combined graph comprises individuals from more than one area (except for the oldest). The first cohort comprises individuals from all areas except 461, being particularly strong in area 483. The second cohort also comprises individuals from all areas except 461, being particularly strong in area 452. The third cohort comprises individuals from all areas, the fourth from areas 452, 460 and 461 only and the fifth from area 461 only. The most logical scenario is therefore that the overall pattern results from varying recruitment success in different areas with roughly the same settlement time and growth rate in each. A possible alternative explanation of the combined distribution might be that there are fewer year classes than five but settling at very different times and growing at very different rates in individual areas. The two areas of highest urchin abundance, 483 and 452, each provide a clear indication of only two cohorts and would lead to the conclusion of a two-year lifespan, but if this were the case it would imply very different settlement times and/or growth rates in the two areas, which are only some 150 km apart in the same sea area and have a very similar sediment type. This would also contradict data from the other areas, where more than two cohorts were typically observed. Furthermore, while there are small differences among areas in the size range of individuals within each year class, if these differences had been larger they would have blurred the clear separation of classes.

The combined size distribution charts suggest that E. pusillus is very slow growing in the studied areas, taking five years to reach the small maximum size of 7.3 mm. The somewhat larger size elsewhere may either mean that it grows faster in these areas or lives longer. Although this species is reported to attain a greater size of 15 mm (Hayward & Ryland, Reference Hayward and Ryland1990), there is no primary citation to support this value, although it is also attributed to Degraer et al. (Reference Degraer, Wittoeck, Appeltans, Cooreman, Deprez, Hillewaert, Hostens, Mees, Vanden Berghe and Vincx2006) by WoRMS Editorial Board (2019). One of us (BP) has counted many thousands of individuals of this species throughout the UK, and never encountered specimens this large, and the 10 mm of Picton & Morrow (Reference Picton and Morrow2016) is probably more realistic. The slow growth rate may be due in part to the low organic content of the coarse sediments that it inhabits, and also to its feeding behaviour which is potentially expensive energetically. The feeding mechanism is atypical for clypeasteroids because the coarse sediment particles are too large relative to the body size to be ingested whole. Sediment particles with attached food material are selected and transported by the suckered podia to the mouth, where particles are held in place and slowly rotated by the free margin of the peristomial membrane, while the teeth strip away diatoms and organic debris (Telford et al., Reference Telford, Harold and Mooi1983). This mode of feeding is thus akin to that of many meiobenthic taxa that feed by scraping the biotic films from sediment particles, e.g. many nematodes (Wieser, Reference Wieser1953) and harpacticoid copepods (Marcott, Reference Marcott1977).

For comparison, limited data are available on growth rates of two larger heart urchins from offshore sediments in this area. Echinocardium cordatum (Pennant, 1777) in the southern part of the North Sea off the Dutch coast has been shown, by an analysis of annual growth rings on the ventral plate, enigmatically to grow fastest in sediments with the lowest organic content (Duineveld & Jenness, Reference Duineveld and Jenness1984). It reaches a maximum length of 43 mm at more southern sites and 33 mm further north, but a longevity of 10 years is the same in all areas. On the other hand, Brissopsis lyrifera (Forbes, 1841) in the finer offshore sediment off the Northumberland coast has a lifespan of four years, reaching a maximum size of 60 mm. The four-year-old individuals breed in November‒December and do not survive to breed a second time (Buchanan, Reference Buchanan1967; Buchanan & Warwick, Reference Buchanan and Warwick1974). The feeding mode of this species is more typical of irregular echinoids, the fine organic sediment being ingested whole.

The results of this study indicate that E. pusillus has an unusual combination of functional traits. Planktotrophic larval development is prevalent in larger-bodied macrobenthic species (no meiobenthic species have planktonic larvae) and is unusual in a species of this size. According to the body sizes recorded in the WoRMS database (WoRMS Editorial Board, 2019), E. pusillus has the smallest body size (length) of all the 37 infaunal genera with planktotrophic larval development listed as occurring in offshore sand and gravel sediments in 20 areas around the UK (Marine Ecological Surveys Limited, 2007). For such a small species, it also has an unusually long lifespan.

On the basis of functional trait analysis it has been concluded that E. pusillus is robust with respect to its potential recoverability from anthropogenic disturbance caused by offshore aggregate extraction (Marine Ecological Surveys Limited, 2007). This will obviously also apply to disturbance by benthic fishing. Although recovery from aggregate extraction has been found to require much longer periods than from benthic fishing (Foden et al., Reference Foden, Rogers and Jones2010), the latter activity takes place over very much wider areas both in UK waters and globally, and the sediments in which E. pusillus lives are particularly vulnerable to scallop dredging (Kaiser et al., Reference Kaiser, Clarke, Hinz, Austen, Somerfield and Karakassis2006). In a study of the effects of fishery exclusion on the benthos in the areas of offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea, E. pusillus showed increases in abundance in the no-fishery areas, supporting its potential for recovery from trawling activities (Coates et al., Reference Coates, Kapasakali, Vincx and Vanaverbeke2016). Echinocyamus pusillus has been assigned to AMBI ecological group I, species very sensitive to organic enrichment and disturbance (Borja et al., Reference Borja, Franco and Perez2000), but AMBI has been shown to be a poor indicator for detecting the physical impacts of aggregate extraction, there being no increased abundance of opportunistic species as a result of the extractions, and is similarly not useful in other naturally stressed communities (Muxika et al., Reference Muxika, Borja and Bonne2005).

Of the traits relevant to the resilience and recoverability from physical disturbance, size, fecundity, lifespan, age at maturity, larval development mode and adult mobility have been considered the most important (Marine Ecological Surveys Limited, 2007). Fecundity and age at maturity for E. pusillus remain unknown and so it is not possible to predict mortality in the plankton or immediately after settlement. However, the numbers of specimens in the successive year classes found in the study area imply an increasing mortality rate with increasing size, presumably mainly as a result of predation by demersal fish, with none surviving beyond their fifth year.

To complete our knowledge of the demographics of this species, more data clearly need to be gathered. A time series of sampling at one or more locations, perhaps also exploring the possibility of analysing test skeletal features for ageing, would substantiate (or otherwise) the annual nature of the cohorts described in the present study. Analysis of the age at reproductive maturity, fecundity and frequency of spawning, concurrently with sampling of larvae in the plankton would substantially enhance our understanding of the functioning of this important and enigmatic species in the benthic ecosystem and its relevance as an indicator of ecological condition.

Acknowledgements

Richard Warwick acknowledges his Sir Walter Murdoch Distinguished Collaborator award and Adjunct Professorship at Murdoch University and his Honorary Research Fellowship at the Plymouth Marine Laboratory. Bryony acknowledges the work of staff at MESL to extract and preserve E. pusillus from grab samples collected as part of project MEPF 04/02. Bryony also acknowledges the support provided by the aggregate extraction licence holders who allowed and facilitated safe access to their active extraction sites.

Financial support

This work was supported by the UK Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) Aggregate Levy Sustainability Fund, Marine Environment Protection Fund Research Grant No. MEPF 04/02.

References

Borja, Á, Franco, J and Perez, V (2000) A marine Biotic Index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40, 11001114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J, Frid, CLJ and Rogers, SI (2003 a) Assessing marine ecosystem health: the long-term effects of fishing on functional diversity in North Sea benthos. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 6, 131137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J, Rogers, SI and Frid, CLJ (2003 b) Assessing functional diversity in marine benthic ecosystems: a comparison of approaches. Marine Ecology Progress Series 254, 1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, JB (1967) Dispersion and demography of some infaunal echinoderm populations. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 20, 111.Google Scholar
Buchanan, JB and Warwick, RM (1974) An estimate of benthic macrofauna production in the offshore mud of the Northumberland coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 54, 197222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, DA, Kapasakali, D-A, Vincx, M and Vanaverbeke, J (2016) Short-term effects of fishery exclusion in offshore wind farms on macrofaunal communities in the Belgian Part of the North Sea. Fisheries Research 179, 131138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, DJ (1984) Energy flow measurements. In Holme, AD and McIntyre, AD (eds), Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 284372.Google Scholar
Degen, R, Aune, M, Bluhm, B, Cassidy, C, Kedra, M, Kraan, C, Vandepitte, L, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M, Zhulay, I, Albano, PG, Bremner, J, Grebmeier, JM, Link, H, Morata, N, Nordström, MC, Shojaei, MG, Sutton, L and Zuschin, M (2018) Trait-based approaches in rapidly changing ecosystems: a roadmap to the future polar oceans. Ecological Indicators 91, 722736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degraer, S, Wittoeck, J, Appeltans, W, Cooreman, K, Deprez, T, Hillewaert, H, Hostens, K, Mees, J, Vanden Berghe, E and Vincx, M (2006) The macrobenthos atlas of the Belgian part of the North Sea. Belgian Science Policy. D/2005/1191/3. ISBN 90-810081-6-1, 164 pp.Google Scholar
de Ridder, C, Lawrence, JM (1982) Food and feeding mechanisms: Echinoidea. In Jangoux, M and Lawrence, JM (eds), Echinoderm Nutrition. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 57115.Google Scholar
Duineveld, GCA and Jenness, MI (1984) Differences in growth rates of the sea urchin Echinocardium cordatum as estimated by the parameter ω of the von Bertalanffy equation applied to skeletal rings. Marine Ecology Progress Series 19, 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleftheriou, A and Basford, DJ (1989) The macrobenthic infauna of the offshore northern North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 69, 123143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foden, J, Rogers, SI and Jones, AP (2010) Recovery of UK seabed habitats from benthic fishing and aggregate extraction – towards a cumulative impact assessment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 411, 259270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folk, RL (1954) The distinction between grain size and mineral compositions in sedimentary rock nomenclature. Journal of Geology 62, 344359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, CL and Warwick, RM (1985) Annual macrofauna production in a hard-bottom reef community. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 65, 713735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grun, TB and Nebelsick, JH (2018) Structural design of the minute clypeasteroid echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus. Royal Society Open Science 5, 171323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayward, PJ and Ryland, JS (eds) (1990) The Marine Fauna of the British Isles and North-West Europe: II. Molluscs to Chordates. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, MJ, Clarke, KR, Hinz, H, Austen, MCV, Somerfield, PJ and Karakassis, I (2006) Global analysis of response and recovery of benthic biota to fishing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 311, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcott, BM (1977) An introduction to the architecture and kinematics of harpacticoid (Copepoda) feeding: Tisbe furcata (Baird, 1837). Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 61, 183196.Google Scholar
Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd (2007) Predictive framework for assessment of recoverability of marine benthic communities following cessation of aggregate dredging. Technical Report to the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Project No MEPF 04/02. 115 pp + electronic appendices 466 pp. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323855148_Predictive_Framework_for_Assessment_of_Recoverability_of_Marine_Benthic_Communities_Following_Cessation_of_Aggregate_Extraction.Google Scholar
Mortensen, TH (1927) Handbook of the Echinoderms of the British Isles. London: Humphrey Milford Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muxika, I, Borja, Á and Bonne, W (2005) The suitability of the marine biotic index (AMBI) to new impact sources along European coasts. Ecological Indicators 5, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picton, BE and Morrow, CC (2016) Echinocyamus pusillus (O F Müller, 1776). In Encyclopedia of Marine Life of Britain and Ireland. http://www.habitas.org.uk/marinelife/species.asp?item=ZB3880 (Accessed 2 September 2020).Google Scholar
Price, R and Warwick, RM (1980) Temporal variations in annual production and biomass in estuarine populations of two polychaetes, Nephtys hombergi and Ampharete acutifrons. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 60, 481487.Google Scholar
Schückel, S, Ehrich, S, Kröncke, I and Reiss, H (2010) Linking prey composition of haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus to benthic availability in three different areas of the northern North Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 77, 98118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southward, EC and Campbell, AC (2006) Echinoderms: keys and notes for the identification of British species. Synopses of the British Fauna (new series) 56. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council.Google Scholar
Strathmann, RR and Strathmann, MF (1982) The relationship between adult size and brooding in marine invertebrates. American Naturalist 119, 91101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telford, M, Harold, AS and Mooi, R (1983) Feeding structures, behavior, and microhabitat of Echinocyamus pusillus (Echinoidea, Clypeastroida). Biological Bulletin 165, 745757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, EHM, Somerfield, PJ, Vanden Berghe, E, Bremner, J, Jackson, E, Langmead, O, Palomares, MLD and Webb, TJ (2012) Extensive gaps and biases in our knowledge of a well-known fauna: implications for integrating biological traits into macroecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21, 922934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meer, J, Brey, T, Heip, CH, Herman, PJM, Moens, T and van Oevelen, D (2013) Measuring the flow of energy and matter in marine benthic animal populations. In Eleftheriou, E (ed.), Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos, 4th edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 349425.Google Scholar
Warwick, RM and George, CL (1980) Annual macrofauna production in an Abra community. In Collins, MB, Banner, FT, Tyler, PA, Wakefield, SJ and James, AE (eds), Industrial Embayments and their Environmental Problems: A Case Study of Swansea Bay. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 517538.Google Scholar
Warwick, RM and Price, R (1975) Macrofauna production in an estuarine mud-flat. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 55, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, RM, George, CL and Davies, JR (1978) Annual macrofauna production in a Venus community. Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Science 7, 215241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieser, W (1953) Die Beziehung zwischen Mundhöhlengestalt, Ernährungsweise und Vorkommen bei freilebenden marinen Nematoden. Arkiv för Zoologi 4, 439484.Google Scholar
WoRMS Editorial Board. World Register of Marine Species. http://www.marinespecies.org (Accessed 6 November 2019).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of SE England showing locations of the six sampling areas. Inset: photograph of a living specimen of Echinocyamus pusillus.

Figure 1

Table 1. Sediment composition in sampling areas as Folk classification categories (Folk, 1954), with sampling date in 2005 and water depth (m)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Size-frequency histograms of Echinocyamus pusillus test length in the six individual areas and in all areas combined.