Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:44:32.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological and molecular characterization of underutilized medicinal wild ginger (Zingiber barbatum Wall.) from Myanmar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2011

Noladhi Wicaksana
Affiliation:
Watanabe Laboratory, Gene Research Center, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki305-8572, Japan Plant Breeding Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Bandung40600, Indonesia
Syed Abdullah Gilani*
Affiliation:
Watanabe Laboratory, Gene Research Center, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki305-8572, Japan
Dawood Ahmad
Affiliation:
Institute of Bio-Technology and Genetics Engineering, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan
Akira Kikuchi
Affiliation:
Watanabe Laboratory, Gene Research Center, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki305-8572, Japan
Kazuo N. Watanabe
Affiliation:
Watanabe Laboratory, Gene Research Center, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki305-8572, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: gilani_abdullah@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zingiber barbatum Wall. (family Zingiberaceae), is an underutilized medicinal plant and commonly known as ‘Meik tha-lin’ in Myanmar where it is used in the indigenous system of medicine. In the present study, 19 accessions of Z. barbatum from five provinces in Myanmar have been utilized to characterize and assess genetic diversity. Twenty-nine morphological characters were noted, including growth habit, leaf, pseudo-stem and rhizome characters. Fifteen primer sets of P450-based analogue (PBA) markers were used to reveal molecular characteristics. Of the 29 morphological characters, 22 showed a high degree of variation within wild ginger accessions, whereas 20 of these characters contributed significantly to morphological variation. Eleven amplified primer sets gave a total of 175 bands and exhibited 92.15% polymorphism across Z. barbatum accessions. Based on morphological characters and PBA markers, 19 accessions can be divided into two morphotype groups with comparatively higher genetic diversity. This information can be applied in future crop improvement, proper conservation and better use of this underutilized medicinal species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Introduction

Myanmar possesses a unique traditional culture of using herbal medicines (Awale et al., Reference Awale, Linn, Than, Swe, Saiki and Kadota2006) and has rich phytodiversity. It is located in the Indo-Burmese biodiversity hotspot (Myers et al., Reference Myers, Mittermeier, Mittermeier, da Fonseca and Kent2000) in a monsoon area of Southeast Asia (10°–28°N and 92°–101°E), with the south having a tropical climate and the north having a temperate climate. Several studies have been conducted using Myanmar germplasm from crops such as banana (Wan et al., Reference Wan, Watanabe, San-San-Yi, Than Htaik, Kyaw Win, Yamanaka, Nakamura and Watanabe2005), tomato (San-San-Yi et al., Reference San-San-Yi, Jatoi, Fujimura, Yamanaka, Watanabe and Watanabe2008), mango (Hirano et al., Reference Hirano, Than Htun Oo and Watanabe2010), Curcuma amada (Jatoi et al., Reference Jatoi, Kikuchi, Ahmad and Watanabe2010) and rice (Yamanaka et al., Reference Yamanaka, Jatoi, San-San-Yi, Kothari, Tin-Htut and Watanabe2011). Myanmar is also one of the main diversity centres of the Zingiber genus (Ravindran et al., Reference Ravindran, Babu, Shiva, Ravindran and Babu2005), with high genetic diversity observed among Zingiber species collected from the genebank, farms and rural markets (Jatoi et al., Reference Jatoi, Kikuchi, Mimura, San-San-Yi and Watanabe2008).

The genus Zingiber consists of 100–150 species (Thelaide, Reference Thelaide1999; Wolff et al., Reference Wolff, Astuti, Brink, de Guzman and Siemonsma1999; Ravindran et al., Reference Ravindran, Babu, Shiva, Ravindran and Babu2005), which are used as spice, essential oil or herbal medicine. Zingiber officinale is used as food flavouring, flowers of Zingiber mioga as a vegetable in Japan and Zingiber zerumbet and Zingiber montanum are widely used as traditional medicines (Ravindran et al., Reference Ravindran, Babu, Shiva, Ravindran and Babu2005). Zingiber is mostly propagated vegetatively through rhizomes. The flower and seed set are rare due to climatic and photoperiodic factors, as well as the high sterility among Zingiber flowers (Ravindran et al., Reference Ravindran, Babu, Shiva, Ravindran and Babu2005).

One of the underutilized medicinal Zingiber species in Myanmar is Zingiber barbatum, locally called ‘Meik tha-lin’ (MAS, 2000). This species is commonly used as a traditional medicine for treating gout, by topical application or oral ingestion. The main function of this traditional medicine is anti-inflammatory and analgesic (Awale et al., Reference Awale, Linn, Than, Swe, Saiki and Kadota2006). Farmers and other local people in Myanmar identify Z. barbatum based on leaf and rhizome characters. However, cultural changes in many areas in Myanmar have reduced the demand for medicinal plants (Awale et al., Reference Awale, Linn, Than, Swe, Saiki and Kadota2006), including Z. barbatum. Lack of information and interest in studying this underutilized crop threatens its existence. Characterization and diversity analysis of Z. barbatum will provide invaluable information for better utilization and conservation.

Morphological characters have been used to characterize and evaluate genetic diversity in Zingiberaceae species, such as Curcuma spp. (Velayudhan et al., Reference Velayudhan, Muralidharan, Amalraj, Gautam, Mandal and Kumar1999; Sasikumar, Reference Sasikumar2005; Hussain et al., Reference Hussain, Tyagi, Sharma and Agrawal2008; Keeratinijakal et al., Reference Keeratinijakal, Kladmook and Laosatit2010), Alpinia spp. (Hussin et al., Reference Hussin, Seng, Ibrahim, Gen, Ping and Nian2000) and Zingiber spp. (Ravindran et al., Reference Ravindran, Sasikumar, George, Ratnambal, Babu, Zachariah and Nair1994; Kladmook et al., Reference Kladmook, Chidchenchey and Keeratinijakal2010), as well as other crop species such as kale (Cartea et al., Reference Cartea, Picoaga, Soengas and Ordás2002), Vitis vinifera (Ortiz et al., Reference Ortiz, Martín, Borrego, Chávez, Rodríguez, Muñoz and Cabello2004), greater yam (Hasan et al., Reference Hasan, Ngadin, Shah and Mohamad2008), watermelon (Szamosi et al., Reference Szamosi, Solmaz, Sari and Bársony2009), melon (Oumouloud et al., Reference Oumouloud, Arnedo-Andrés, González-Torres and Álvarez2009), wheat (Dos Santos et al., Reference Dos Santos, Ganança, Slaski and Pinheiro de Carvalho2009) and cowpea (Ghalmi et al., Reference Ghalmi, Malice, Jacquemin, Ounane, Mekliche and Baudoin2010). However, morphological characters, especially quantitative traits, are not stable due to the high dependence on genetic × environment effects (Hussain et al., Reference Hussain, Tyagi, Sharma and Agrawal2008; Oumouloud et al., Reference Oumouloud, Arnedo-Andrés, González-Torres and Álvarez2009). Molecular markers are beneficial complements since these are independent of environmental effects (Solmaz et al., Reference Solmaz, Sari, Aka-Kacar and Yalcin-Mendi2010). The combination of morphological characters with molecular markers will provide more comprehensive information about the underutilized Z. barbatum.

Limited molecular markers are available for underutilized species, especially Zingiberaceae. The functionality of using randomized amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) has been reported for Z. montanum (Bua-in and Paisooksantivatana, Reference Bua-in and Paisooksantivatana2010) and Z. officinale (Kizhakkayil and Sasikumar, Reference Kizhakkayil and Sasikumar2010; Sajeev et al., Reference Sajeev, Roy, Iangrai, Pattanayak and Deka2011), inter simple sequence repeats (SSR) for Z. officinale (Kizhakkayil and Sasikumar, Reference Kizhakkayil and Sasikumar2010) and rice SSR markers as an RAPD marker for Zingiberaceae (Jatoi et al., Reference Jatoi, Kikuchi, San-San-Yi, Naing, Yamanaka, Watanabe and Watanabe2006). However, these markers only characterize the neutral region (Yamanaka et al., Reference Yamanaka, Suzuki, Tanaka, Takeda, Watanabe and Watanabe2003) and do not cover the entire genome (Karp, Reference Karp, Engels, Rao, Brown and Jakson2002). Our laboratory has developed P450-based analogue (PBA) markers, a functional marker system based on cytochrome P450 (Yamanaka et al., Reference Yamanaka, Suzuki, Tanaka, Takeda, Watanabe and Watanabe2003), which plays an important role in oxidative metabolism of endogenous and exogenous lipophilic compounds (Inui et al., Reference Inui, Kodama, Ohkawa and Ohkawa2000) as well as the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in higher plants (Teutsch et al., Reference Teutsch, Hasenfratz, Lesot, Stoltz, Garnier, Jeltsch, Durst and Reichhart1993; Ohkawa et al., Reference Ohkawa, Imaishi, Shiota, Yamada, Inui and Ohkawa1998). These markers provided highly informative results in diversity studies of 51 species from 28 different families (Yamanaka et al., Reference Yamanaka, Suzuki, Tanaka, Takeda, Watanabe and Watanabe2003), Myanmar banana landraces (Wan et al., Reference Wan, Watanabe, San-San-Yi, Than Htaik, Kyaw Win, Yamanaka, Nakamura and Watanabe2005), genetic variation within and among the fragmented populations of Withania coagulans (Gilani et al., Reference Gilani, Kikuchi and Watanabe2009) and C. amada accessions (Jatoi et al., Reference Jatoi, Kikuchi, Ahmad and Watanabe2010). Based on successful cross-amplification to the different species and families, in combination with morphological characters, we applied PBA markers for molecular characterization of Z. barbatum from Myanmar.

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the morphological and molecular characteristics as well as to determine the genetic diversity of Z. barbatum in Myanmar.

Materials and methods

Plant material

A total of 19 accessions of Z. barbatum were collected from five provinces of Myanmar (Kachin State, Shan State, Mandalay Division, Bago Division and Yangon Division) from 2004 to 2008 (Supplementary Table S1, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org) and maintained as living collections in the field and greenhouse of Gene Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. The locations of the Z. barbatum collection were scattered from the northern highlands to the southern lowlands of Myanmar (Supplementary Fig. S1, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org). Four accessions of Zingiber, including three accessions of ginger (Z. officinale; two from Myanmar and one from Thailand) and one accession of hardy ginger (Z. mioga; originally from Tsukuba Japan) were also used as out-group controls.

Morphological studies

This study was conducted during the planting season of year 2009 (March–December). Rhizomes of 23 accessions (30 g each) were planted and grown in plastic pots of 30-cm diameter and 50-cm height containing 2–3 cm of large granule soil (Akadama churyu, Kato Sangyo Co., Kanuma-shi, Japan) at the base for better drainage and a pre-mixed soil (Hana to yasai no bayo do, Kato Sangyo Co., Kanuma-shi, Japan) as growth medium. Pots were arranged in the field according to a randomized complete block design with two replications.

Morphological characters were observed following the descriptor list for Z. officinale developed by Ahmad (Reference Ahmad2008), with some modifications. A total of 29 morphological characters including growth habit, plant height, pseudo-stem, leaf sheath, leaf, ligule and rhizome characters (Supplementary Table S2, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org) were studied. Flower characteristics were not included due to the rarity of flowering during three planting seasons in Japan (from 2006 to 2008).

Eight quantitative characters, i.e. plant height, pseudo-stem width, leaf length, leaf width, leaf length-to-width ratio, number of leaves per tiller, rhizome thickness and rhizome yield per pot, were observed and measured using a ruler, vernier calipers and a balance. Plant height, pseudo-stem width, leaf length, leaf width and number of leaves per tiller were recorded from three to five tillers. Plant height was measured from the soil surface to the point of maximum height. Pseudo-stem width was recorded at the first leaf point at the base of the tiller. Leaf length and leaf width were measured for the four largest leaves for each tiller. Leaf width was measured at three points, i.e. at the centre and each quarter point. The leaf length-to-width ratio was calculated from the average leaf length and leaf width of each tiller. Number of leaves per tiller was counted for the tallest tiller from the first leaf at the base of tiller to the last leaf at the terminal of the tiller. Rhizome thickness was measured at the thickest point of five rhizomes. Rhizome yield per pot was obtained from the weight at harvest time after cleaning the rhizome.

Scoring and all measurements were conducted at the maximum vegetative stage and at harvesting times. The quantitative data were recorded from at least three tillers and averaged for analysis. The data were then recorded directly from the measurement using either a 1–9 scale or binary recording (1 = present, 0 = absent).

DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification

Slight modification of the hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, described by Doyle and Doyle (Reference Doyle and Doyle1990), was used to extract total genomic DNA from dry leaf samples of each accession. Dried leaves (0.05 g) were ground in liquid nitrogen and 700 μl CTAB extraction buffer (2% CTAB, 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0) were added with 0.2% 2-mercaptoethanol. The homogenate sample was incubated at 60°C for 30 min with occasional gentle swirling. Extraction was made twice using an equal volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1). The DNA was precipitated with 400 μl cold 2-propanol, washed in wash buffer (76% EtOH and 10 mM ammonium acetate) for 20 min, dried and dissolved in 1 ×  Tris–EDTA (TE) buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4). The DNA quantity was measured with a spectrophotometer and quality was checked on 1% agarose gels. To purify the DNA from RNA, RNase treatment was applied to all the DNA samples. A final concentration of 10 μg/ml RNase was added to the dissolved DNA and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. The sample was then diluted with two volumes of distilled water, and ammonium acetate added to a final concentration of 2.5 M. The DNA was precipitated using 2.5 volumes of cold 100% EtOH, washed in 70% EtOH, dried and re-suspended in TE buffer. Stock DNA was diluted to 25 ng/μl working solution for PCR analysis.

Eight PBA primers were chosen in this study (Supplementary Table S3, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org) and, according to Yamanaka et al. (Reference Yamanaka, Suzuki, Tanaka, Takeda, Watanabe and Watanabe2003), 15 primer pairs were used for amplification (Supplementary Table S4, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org). A PCR cocktail was prepared in a total volume of 20 μl, containing 1 μl 25 ng genomic DNA, 10 ×  Ex Taq buffer, 2.5 mM of each deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate mix, 10 μM of each primer and 0.5 units Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Japan). The PCR cocktail was run in a Gene Amp PCR system 9700 with the following PCR conditions: 94°C pre-denaturation step for 5 min, followed by 32 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C annealing for 2 min, 72°C extension for 3 min and final extension at 72°C for 10 min, followed by cooling to 4°C. The PCR product was electrophoresed using 1.5% of agarose gels in 0.5 ×  tris–borate–EDTA buffer and stained with ethidium bromide.

Statistical analysis

Morphological analysis was done based on one planting season data of the respective year. Average, standard deviation and range were calculated for all the quantitative data, i.e. plant height, pseudo-stem width, leaf length, leaf width, leaf length-to-width ratio, number of leaves per tiller, rhizome thickness and rhizome yield per pot. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the significance of variation among the accessions using SYSTAT 11 software. The quantitative data were then categorized based on the descriptor list and combined with the qualitative data. Only those data that discriminated between accessions were used for further analysis.

Amplified fragments were scored in a binary fashion, with 1 and 0 representing presence and absence of DNA fragments, respectively. These scored data were first used to calculate the number of bands, percentage polymorphisms and polymorphic information content (PIC) (Botstein et al., Reference Botstein, White, Skolnick and Davis1980). All data were then standardized and subjected to multivariate analysis using principal components analysis (PCA) for morphological data, principal coordinates analysis for molecular data and cluster analysis using NTSys-pc software (Rohlf, Reference Rohlf2000).

Morphological data were used to generate the eigenvalue, percentage variation accumulated for each PCA and load coefficient value of each character in their respective principal components (PCs). The first three PCs were selected, and the characters with load coefficient values ≥ 0.6 were considered as major contributors for that PC and considered informative characters for distinguishing the accessions (Jeffers, Reference Jeffers1967). The first two PCs with the highest variations were scattered in the two-dimensional plot to find the accession dispersion.

Results

Nineteen accessions of Z. barbatum collected from five locations in Myanmar and the out-groups species were characterized based on morphological characters and functional markers. Larger variations in morphological characters were observed between the Zingiber species and within Z. barbatum accessions in 22 characters (Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary Tables S2 and S5, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

Table 1 Variability in 22 discriminated qualitative morphological characters based on a modified descriptor list for Zingiber officinale

Table 2 Means, standard deviations, ranges and P-values of eight quantitative characters within all accessions and Zingiber barbatum accessions

Plant characteristics

The majority of Z. barbatum accessions (89.47%) and Z. officinale had an erect growth habit, while Z. mioga had a lodging growth habit. A semi-erect characteristic was observed in two Z. barbatum accessions (Z 189 and Z 192) from Shan State. Tall plants were a common characteristic for Z. barbatum, in which 94.74% were more than 90 cm in height. Compared to these accessions, Z. officinale and Z. mioga were shorter. Z. barbatum (78.95%) and Z. mioga had a thicker pseudo-stem (>9 mm) compared to Z. officinale. There were only three Z. barbatum accessions (Z 116, Z 189 and Z 190) that had similar characteristics of pseudo-stem width to Z. officinale (Table 1, Supplementary Tables S2 and S5, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

There were two types each of leaf sheath (63.16% split but not overlapping and 36.84% closed), leaf sheath attachment pattern (57.89% compact and 42.11% loose) and leaf margin (57.89% wide papery margin and 42.11% narrow papery margin) within Z. barbatum accessions, while within Z. officinale and Z. mioga only split but not overlapping, loose type and narrow papery leaf sheath margins were found. More than 60% of all accessions had identical leaf sheath pubescence and leaf sheath colour (glabrous, green colour). Pubescence was found only within Z. barbatum accessions, and Z 154 from Shan State and Z 145 from Kachin State showed prominent pubescence on the leaf sheath surface (Table 1, Supplementary Table S5, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

Simple leaf division, entire leaf margin and cunneate leaf base were observed in all of the investigated accessions. Larger variation in leaf shape was observed within Z. barbatum accessions, with shapes of lanceolate, linear, elliptic and oblong. Lanceolate leaf shape was the most common and found in accessions from Shan State and Yangon Division. Oblong leaves were found in accessions from Kachin State (Z 145) and two accessions from Mandalay Division (Z 105 and Z 116). All Z. officinale accessions had linear leaf shape, whereas within Z. barbatum accessions, only two (Z 154 from Shan State and Z 158 from Mandalay Division) showed this character. Two types of leaf apex, caudate and acute, were found in equal proportions within Z. barbatum accessions. Zingiber officinale species had a caudate leaf apex, while Z. mioga had an acute leaf apex (Table 1, Supplementary Table S5, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

Similar to the leaf sheath pubescence, the majority of leaf surfaces were also glabrous. Only a single accession of Z. barbatum from Kachin State (Z 145) had pubescent leaves, and 39.13% of all accessions, including Z. officinale, showed pubescence characteristics on the abaxial leaf surface. Dark green was the common leaf colour within Z. barbatum accessions, followed by green and yellowish green, which was found only in Z 116 from Mandalay Division and Z 154 from Shan State. Two accessions of Z. officinale from Myanmar had green leaf colour, while Z. officinale from Thailand had the darker green leaves (Table 1, Supplementary Table S5, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

Leaf size was assessed from leaf length, leaf width and the leaf length-to-width ratio. In most plants, leaf length in Z. barbatum, Z. officinale and Z. mioga accessions ranged from 26 to 35 cm, but shorter leaves were found in two Z. barbatum accessions (Z 162 from Bago Divison and Z 111 from Mandalay Division) and one Z. officinale from Thailand. Almost all of Z. barbatum accessions had a leaf width ranging from 3 to 5 cm, while only a single accession from Kachin State (Z 145) had broader leaves, similar to Z. mioga (Z 201). The ratio of leaf length to width was related to leaf shape. Z 162 had the lowest ratio and an elliptic leaf, similar to Z. mioga. The highest ratios were found in Z 155, Z 189 and Z 153, as well as Z. officinale accessions, indicating lanceolate to linear leaves. Most Z. barbatum and Z. officinale produced up to 30 leaves per tiller. There were two Z. barbatum accessions that formed fewer leaves per tiller: Z 157 from Mandalay Division and Z 189 from Shan State. Zingiber mioga had the lowest number of leaves per tiller, compared to the other two species (Table 1, Supplementary Tables S2 and S5, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

There was no variation in the presence of the ligule and the ligule margin across the investigated accessions. Equal proportions of two ligule sizes and shapes (i.e. short and emarginated; long and bi-lobed) were found within Z. barbatum accessions. All the Z. officinale accessions had short and emarginated ligules, while Z. mioga showed the long and bi-lobed ligule type (Table 1).

Rhizome characteristics

Most of the accessions produced thick rhizomes; only Z. mioga produced a very thin rhizome. However, most of the accessions produced less rhizome, and therefore rhizome thickness was not followed by higher rhizomes yield per pot. Higher rhizome yield was observed in two accessions of Z. barbatum from Mandalay Division (Z 105 and Z 116), while Z. officinale produced >300 g of fresh rhizome per pot (Supplementary Tables S2 and S5, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org). Moderately larger variation was found in rhizome skin and flesh colour. Rhizome flesh colour ranged from pale to dark yellow and rhizome skin from pale yellow to yellow. Zingiber officinale and Z. mioga were darker (light brown) than Z. barbatum accessions (Table 1).

Variability in quantitative characters

Mean, standard deviation and range were calculated for eight quantitative characters (Table 2). ANOVA was also used to determine the significance of the variation between accessions. Seven quantitative characters – plant height, pseudo-stem width, leaf width, leaf length-to-width ratio, number of leaves per tiller, rhizome thickness and rhizome yield per pot – showed significant variation across all accessions. The variations in plant height, pseudo-stem width and leaf length were not significant within the Z. barbatum accessions. Although there was no significant variation observed in plant height, pseudo-stem width and leaf length characters, there was a wide range of minimum and maximum values, indicating higher inter- and intra-specific variability among Zingiber species and within Z. barbatum accessions.

Molecular characterization

Fifteen PBA primer sets were used to determine the molecular characteristics and genetic diversity of Z. barbatum accessions and out-groups (Table 3). Out of 15 primer sets of PBA markers, 11 primer pairs were successfully amplified and produced 199 and 175 bands with averages of 18.1 and 15.9 bands in all accessions and within Z. barbatum accessions, respectively. The primer set CYP1A1F/CYP2B6R gave the highest number of bands in all accessions as well as within Z. barbatum accessions and comparatively, primer sets CYP2C19F/heme2C19, CYP2C19F/CYP1A1R and CYP1A1F/CYP2C19R produced fewer bands per primer set. However, all the primers were highly informative, with a high percentage polymorphism and PIC.

Table 3 Frequency of polymorphic bands within all accessions and Zingiber barbatum accessions

PIC, polymorphic information content.

Multivariate analysis

Multivariate analysis was used on 19 accessions of Z. barbatum, as well as three accessions of Z. officinale and one accession of Z. mioga as out-groups. PCA and cluster analysis, based on 22 discriminated morphological characters, revealed high genetic diversity in Z. barbatum. Generally, the 19 accessions of Z. barbatum from Myanmar could be grouped into two morphotypes and were clearly separated from Z. officinale and Z. mioga (Figs 1 and 2).

Fig. 1 Two-dimensional plot of 19 Zingiber barbatum accessions (■), three Zingiber officinale accessions (○) and a Zingiber mioga accession (□). (a) PCs generated from 22 morphological characters with contribution rates of PC-1 and PC-2 of 42.61 and 17.11%, respectively. (b) PCs generated from molecular data with contribution rates of PC-1 and PC-2 of 25.85 and 17.39%, respectively.

Fig. 2 Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean clustering of Zingiber barbatum, Zingiber offininale and Zingiber mioga. (a) Dendrogram generated from 22 morphological characters using the Euclidean dissimilarity index. (b) Dendrogram generated from 11 P450-based analogue primer sets using the coefficient of Jaccard similarity (confidence interval was tested by bootstrapping with 1000 iterations, and only values >60% are shown).

The first three PCs, generated from morphological characters, accumulated 72.20% of total variation (Table 4). The first PC gave an eigenvalue of 7.86 and explained 35.73% of total variation. The characters related to leaf sheath (type, attachment pattern, pubescence and margin), leaf (shape, apex, pubescence, width and length-to-width ratio), ligules (shape and size) and rhizome flesh colour were major contributors to this PC (load coefficient correlation >0.6). The second PC was correlated with plant height, leaf sheath colour, leaf length and rhizome skin colour. PC-2 had an eigenvalue of 4.56 and explained 20.73% of total variation. In the third PC (PC-3), plant growth habit, number of leaves per tiller, rhizome thickness and rhizome yield characters made a significant contribution to total variation in PC-3.

Table 4 Load coefficient of each discriminated morphological character for the first three principal components (PCs)

Italics indicates the major contributor (>0.6) that significantly contributed to the variation.

The scatter plot of the first two PCs, generated from morphological characters, showed grouping of Z. barbatum accessions (Fig. 1(a)). The Z. barbatum accessions were clearly separated from Z. officinale and Z. mioga and further subdivided into two groups. The first group, with eight members, was characterized by loose and split but not overlapping leaf sheathes with a narrow margin, pubescent leaf sheath and leaf surface, elliptic or oblong leaf shape with acute leaf apex, and short and bi-lobed ligule. The second group, with 11 members, was characterized by compact and closed leaf sheath with a wide margin, glabrous leaf sheath and leaf surface, lanceolate leaf with caudate leaf apex, and long and emarginated ligules.

Similar to the multivariate analysis based on morphological characters, principal coordinates analysis based on molecular data produced using 11 sets of PBA primers also exhibited a clear separation between Z. barbatum and out-group species from the Zingiber genus (Fig. 1(b)). The first two PCs accumulated 43.24% of the total variation, and showed that diversity occurs within Z. barbatum accessions. Although it was less clear, Z. barbatum accessions could be divided into two groups. This was further confirmed in the cluster analysis.

Cluster analysis based on 22 morphological characters and 11 sets of PBA primers supported the PCA result. Both results showed similar species separation and clustering of Z. barbatum accessions (Fig. 2). The dendrogram gave a clear separation and clustered Z. barbatum accessions into two groups, with a Euclidean dissimilarity coefficient ranging from 1.77 to 9.66 (Fig. 2(a)) and Jaccard similarity coefficient from 0.21 to 0.97 (Fig. 2(b)). The dendrogram generated from the 11 PBA primers was also supported by a high bootstrap value (Fig. 2(b)).

Cluster analysis based on 22 morphological characters showed that Z. barbatum accessions from Mandalay and Bago divisions were spread in equal proportions within two clusters, while the majority of accessions from Shan State were placed in the second cluster (Fig. 2(a)). Accessions from Kachin State and Yangon Division were placed in group 1 and group 2, respectively. The first cluster (group 1) consisted of four accessions from Mandalay Division (Z 105, Z 111, Z 116 and Z 113), two accessions from Bago Division (Z 162 and Z 161), one accession from Shan State (Z 154) and one accession from Kachin State (Z 145). The second cluster (group 2) contained three accessions from Mandalay Division (Z 158, Z 157 and Z 156), two accessions from Bago Division (Z 63 and Z 160), five accessions from Shan State (Z 155, Z 189, Z 190, Z 192 and Z 191) and one accession from Yangon Division (Z 153). The cluster analysis based on 11 PBA primers produced similar grouping, except for one accession from Bago Division (Z 63), which originally came from the Myanmar Gene Bank and shifted to the first group (Fig. 2(b)).

Discussion

The broad genetic basis of the germplasm and wide variability in characters provide a basis for sustainable utilization and crop improvement, including clonally propagated plant material (Sasikumar et al., Reference Sasikumar, Krishnamoorthy, George, Peter and Ravindran1999). Characterization and studies of genetic diversity of underutilized crops are critical and will provide invaluable information for planning meaningful breeding strategies (Cooper et al., Reference Cooper, Spillane, Hodgkin, Cooper, Spillane and Hodgkin2001). Here, we characterized the morphological and molecular characteristics, as well as assessed the genetic diversity, of a clonally propagated traditional medicinal plant from Myanmar, Z. barbatum. A wide range of variability was observed within 22 characters across 29 investigated morphological characters, including qualitative and quantitative characters, indicating that a high degree of morphological variation is present among the Z. barbatum accessions. This represents a rich Z. barbatum germplasm resource in Myanmar.

Generally, Z. barbatum growing in Myanmar can be characterized as high and erect plants, which is also a common feature of the Zingiber genus (Wolff et al., Reference Wolff, Astuti, Brink, de Guzman and Siemonsma1999; Ravindran et al., Reference Ravindran, Babu, Shiva, Ravindran and Babu2005). The accessions have split, closed and compact or loose leaf sheaths, mostly with a glabrous and green colour. The papery sheath margin is prominent in this underutilized crop. Leaves are lanceolate to oblong with a caudate or acute apex, mostly glabrous or pubescent on the lower surface, green to dark green in colour and medium to long or wide. This species has an emarginate or bi-lobed ligule. Most accessions have a thick rhizome of various skin and flesh colour. The leaf and rhizome characteristics are also used by local people in Myanmar to differentiate Z. barbatum from other closely related species.

This study also provided important morphological characters for the study of genetic diversity in Z. barbatum. PCA revealed that the most informative characters for diversity are leaf sheath type, leaf sheath arrangement, leaf sheath pubescence, leaf sheath margin, leaf shape, leaf arrangement, leaf pubescence, leaf width, leaf length-to-width ratio, ligule shape and size and rhizome flesh colour. These characters constituted a significant contribution to variation and discrimination within Z. barbatum accessions, as well as to differentiating them from other species in the Zingiber genus. The pseudo-stem, leaf sheath, leaf and ligule characters have also been used for phylogenetic study of Zingiber species in Thailand (Thelaide, Reference Thelaide1999) and China (Delin and Larsen, Reference Delin and Larsen2000).

Higher polymorphism among morphological characters was also well supported from molecular characterization using PBA markers as functional markers. Higher numbers of bands (15.9 bands per primer set) and percentage of polymorphic bands (92.15% polymorphic bands) across Z. barbatum accessions indicate high variability and ample possibilities for finding novel gene combinations. In parallel with this study, high numbers of bands per primer set (13.3) and high percentages of polymorphism (94.58%) were found in a mango ginger collection from Myanmar (Jatoi et al., Reference Jatoi, Kikuchi, Ahmad and Watanabe2010). A high percentage of polymorphic bands was also observed in a W. coagulans population from Pakistan, with an average of 71.95% (Gilani et al., Reference Gilani, Kikuchi and Watanabe2009), and a banana collection from Myanmar, with 42 bands and 64.3% polymorphic bands (Wan et al., Reference Wan, Watanabe, San-San-Yi, Than Htaik, Kyaw Win, Yamanaka, Nakamura and Watanabe2005).

Multivariate analysis using morphological characters and PBA markers produced a clear separation of Z. barbatum from the other species examined, as well as similar morphotype grouping. This indicates the significance of these two marker groups. Morphological characters and PBA markers may explain genetic diversity at the same level. PBA markers are genome-wide diversity markers that were developed based on the cytochrome P450 gene family and are involved in various important physiological pathways in higher plants (Yamanaka et al., Reference Yamanaka, Ikeda, Imai, Luan, Watanabe and Watanabe2005) and probably affect many morphological characters.

Two Z. barbatum morphotype groups were found in this study, which could be differentiated by leaf sheath, leaf and ligule characters. It seems that there are two different species that are given the same name by local communities and among which local people could not differentiate. Further confirmation of these two morphotypes could be obtained using molecular analyses, such as sequence analysis of highly conserved genes and inter-genic spacers of chloroplast DNA, to provide a clear picture of this medicinal plant.

High genetic diversity was revealed within the Z. barbatum accessions collected from five regions in Myanmar. Low similarity of the Jaccard index and high dissimilarity of the Euclidean index between and within the morphotype groups confirmed the high degree of variability among this clonally propagated plant. In parallel with this study, high genetic diversity was also found within different collection sources of Z. officinale (Jatoi et al., Reference Jatoi, Kikuchi, Mimura, San-San-Yi and Watanabe2008), Z. montanum from Thailand (Bua-in and Paisooksantivatana, Reference Bua-in and Paisooksantivatana2010) and different collection sources of C. amada from Myanmar (Jatoi et al., Reference Jatoi, Kikuchi, Ahmad and Watanabe2010). Although Z. barbatum is vegetatively propagated, wide morphological and molecular variability and high genetic diversity were observed in this study. Possibly, the long cultivation and utilization history as a traditional medicine in Myanmar by local people and healers, as well as the wide range of local tribes and eco-geographical conditions, has maintained diversity through diversified human selection (Hangelbroek et al., Reference Hangelbroek, Ouborg, Santamaria and Schwenk2002).

Zingiber barbatum accessions used in this study were collected from diverse eco-geographic conditions. Nevertheless, there was no specific relationship between the accession and collection place. Zingiber barbatum can be found as a wild plant as well as in the backyards of diverse ethnic groups because of its significant medicinal value. This crop was probably transported and planted from one area to another by users. The same result was reported by Bua-in and Paisooksantivatana (Reference Bua-in and Paisooksantivatana2010) in cassumunar ginger (Z. montanum) collected from various locations in Thailand.

In conclusion, this is the first report on the morphological and molecular characterization and genetic diversity of Z. barbatum, a medicinal plant from Myanmar. The results showed wide variation and high genetic diversity in this underutilized medicinal crop, representing ample genetic resource availability for crop improvement through breeding programmes. In addition, the important morphological characters identified will be very useful for further genetic diversity studies, not only in Z. barbatum accessions but also for other species of Zingiber.

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by a Grant-in Aid (21405017) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This work was performed in collaboration with the Myanmar Agricultural Service, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation (MOAI), Myanmar.

References

Ahmad, S (2008) Diversity study on Zingiberaceae genetic resources with special reference to Myanmar. PhD Thesis, University of Tsukuba.Google Scholar
Awale, S, Linn, TZ, Than, MM, Swe, T, Saiki, I and Kadota, S (2006) The healing art of traditional medicines in Myanmar. Journal of Traditional Medicine 23: 4768.Google Scholar
Botstein, D, White, RL, Skolnick, M and Davis, RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 314331.Google ScholarPubMed
Bua-in, S and Paisooksantivatana, Y (2010) Study of clonally propagated cassumunar ginger (Zingiber montanum (Koenig) Link ex Dietr.) and its relation of Wild Zingiber species from Thailand revealed by RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 405414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartea, ME, Picoaga, A, Soengas, P and Ordás, A (2002) Morphological characterization of kale populations from northwestern Spain. Euphytica 129: 2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, HD, Spillane, C and Hodgkin, T (2001) Broadening the genetic base of crops: an overview. In: Cooper, HD, Spillane, C and Hodgkin, T (eds) Broadening the Genetic Base of Crop Production. Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing, pp. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delin, W and Larsen, K (2000) Zingiberaceae. Flora of China 24: 235377.Google Scholar
Dos Santos, TMM, Ganança, F, Slaski, JJ and Pinheiro de Carvalho, MÂA (2009) Morphological characterization of wheat genetic resources from the Island of Madeira, Portugal. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 363375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, JJ and Doyle, JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 1315.Google Scholar
Ghalmi, N, Malice, M, Jacquemin, JM, Ounane, SM, Mekliche, L and Baudoin, JP (2010) Morphological and molecular diversity within Algerian cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) landraces. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 371386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilani, SA, Kikuchi, A and Watanabe, KN (2009) Genetic variation within and among fragmented populations of endangered medicinal plant, Withania coagulans (Solanaceae) from Pakistan and its implications for conservation. African Journal of Biotechnology 8: 29482958.Google Scholar
Hangelbroek, HH, Ouborg, NJ, Santamaria, L and Schwenk, S (2002) Clonal diversity and strucuture within a population of the pondweed Potamogeton pectinatus foraged by Bewick's swans. Molecular Ecology 11: 21372150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, SMZ, Ngadin, AA, Shah, RM and Mohamad, N (2008) Morphological variability of greater yam (Dioscorea alata L.) in Malaysia. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 6: 5261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, R, Than Htun Oo, T and Watanabe, KN (2010) Myanmar mango landraces reveal genetic uniqueness over common cultivars from Florida, India, and Southeast Asia. Genome 53: 321330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, Z, Tyagi, RK, Sharma, R and Agrawal, A (2008) Genetic diversity in in vitro-conserved germplasm of Curcuma L. as revealed by RAPD markers. Biologia Plantarum 52: 627633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussin, KH, Seng, CT, Ibrahim, H, Gen, WQ, Ping, LJ and Nian, L (2000) Comparative leaf anatomy of Alpinia Roxb. species (Zingiberaceae) from China. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 161180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inui, H, Kodama, T, Ohkawa, Y and Ohkawa, A (2000) Herbicide metabolism and cross-tolerance in transgenic potato plants co-expressing human CYP1A1, CYP2B6, and CYP2B19. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 66: 116129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jatoi, SA, Kikuchi, A, Ahmad, D and Watanabe, KN (2010) Characterization of the genetic structure of mango ginger (Curcuma amada Roxb.) from Myanmar in farm and genebank collection by the neutral and functional genomic markers. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2225/vol13-issue6-fulltext-10.Google Scholar
Jatoi, SA, Kikuchi, A, Mimura, M, San-San-Yi, and Watanabe, KN (2008) Relationship of Zingiber species, and genetic variability assessment in ginger (Zingiber officinale) accessions from ex-situ genebank, on-farm and rural market. Breeding Science 58: 261270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jatoi, SA, Kikuchi, A, San-San-Yi, , Naing, KW, Yamanaka, S, Watanabe, JA and Watanabe, KN (2006) Use of rice SSR markers as RAPD markers for genetic diversity analysis in Zingiberaceae. Breeding Science 56: 107111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffers, JNR (1967) Two case studies in the application of principal component analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics) 16: 225236.Google Scholar
Karp, A (2002) The new genetic era: will it help us in managing genetic diversity? In: Engels, JMM, Rao, VR, Brown, AHD and Jakson, MT (eds) Managing Plant Genetic Diversity. Wallingford: CAB Publishing, pp. 4356.Google Scholar
Keeratinijakal, V, Kladmook, M and Laosatit, K (2010) Identification and characterization of Curcuma comosa Roxb., phytoestrogens-producing plant, using AFLP markers and morphological characteristics. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 4: 26512657.Google Scholar
Kiyokawa, S, Ohbayashi, M, Shimada, Y and Kikuchi, Y (1997) PCR-amplification of sequences encoding the heme-binding region of plant cytochrome P450. Plant Biotechnology 14: 175178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kizhakkayil, J and Sasikumar, B (2010) Genetic diversity analysis of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) germplasm based on RAPD and ISSR markers. Scientia Horticulturae 125: 7376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kladmook, V, Chidchenchey, S and Keeratinijakal, V (2010) Assessment of genetic diversity in cassumunar ginger (Zingiber cassumunar Roxb.) in Thailand using AFLP markers. Breeding Science 60: 412418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAS(2000) Common Name, Scientific Name, and Botanical Name of Important Shrub and Tree in Myanmar. Myanmar: Department of Planning Myanmar Agriculture Service (MAS). (In Burmese).Google Scholar
Myers, N, Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, da Fonseca, GAB and Kent, J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohkawa, H, Imaishi, H, Shiota, N, Yamada, T, Inui, H and Ohkawa, Y (1998) Molecular mechanisms of herbicide resistance with special emphasis on cytochrome P450 mono-oxigenases. Plant Biotechnology 15: 173176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, JM, Martín, JP, Borrego, J, Chávez, J, Rodríguez, I, Muñoz, G and Cabello, F (2004) Molecular and morphological characterization of a Vitis gene bank for the establishment of a base collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 403409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oumouloud, A, Arnedo-Andrés, MS, González-Torres, R and Álvarez, JM (2009) Morphological and molecular characterization of melon accession resistant to Fusarium wilts. Euphytica 169: 6979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, PN, Babu, KN and Shiva, KN (2005) Botany and crop improvement of ginger. In: Ravindran, PN and Babu, KN (eds) Ginger: The Genus Zingiber. New York: CRC Press, pp. 1585.Google Scholar
Ravindran, PN, Sasikumar, B, George, JK, Ratnambal, MJ, Babu, KN, Zachariah, JT and Nair, RR (1994) Genetic resources of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) and its conservation in India. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 98: 14.Google Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (2000) NTSYSpc 21 Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Setauket, NY: Exeter Software.Google Scholar
Sajeev, S, Roy, AR, Iangrai, B, Pattanayak, A and Deka, BC (2011) Genetic diversity analysis in the traditional and improved ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) clones cultivated in North-East India. Scientia Horticulturae 128: 182188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San-San-Yi, , Jatoi, SA, Fujimura, T, Yamanaka, S, Watanabe, J and Watanabe, KN (2008) Potential loss of unique genetic diversity in tomato landraces by genetic colonization of modern cultivars at a non-center of origin. Plant Breeding 127: 189196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasikumar, B (2005) Genetic resources of Curcuma: diversity, characterization and utilization. Plant Genetic Resources 3: 230251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasikumar, B, Krishnamoorthy, B, George, JK, Peter, KV and Ravindran, PN (1999) Spice diversity and conservation of plants that yield major spices in India. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 118: 1926.Google Scholar
Solmaz, I, Sari, N, Aka-Kacar, Y and Yalcin-Mendi, NY (2010) The genetic characterization of Turkish watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) accession using RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 763771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szamosi, C, Solmaz, I, Sari, N and Bársony, C (2009) Morphological characterization of Hungarian and Turkish watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. et Nakai) genetic resources. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 10911105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teutsch, HG, Hasenfratz, MP, Lesot, A, Stoltz, C, Garnier, JM, Jeltsch, JM, Durst, F and Reichhart, DW (1993) Isolation and sequence of a cDNA encoding the Jerusalem artichoke cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, a major plant cytochrome P450 involved in the general phenylpropanoid pathway. PNAS 90: 41024106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelaide, I (1999) A synopsis of the genus Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) in Thailand. Nordic Journal of Botany 19: 389410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velayudhan, KC, Muralidharan, VK, Amalraj, VA, Gautam, PL, Mandal, S and Kumar, D (1999) Curcuma Genetic Resources. Scientific Monograph No. 4. New Delhi: National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources.Google Scholar
Wan, Y, Watanabe, JA, San-San-Yi, , Than Htaik, , Kyaw Win, , Yamanaka, S, Nakamura, I and Watanabe, KN (2005) Assessment of genetic diversity among the major Myanmar banana landraces. Breeding Science 55: 365369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, XY, Astuti, IP and Brink, M (1999) Zingiber G.R. Boehmer. In: de Guzman, CC and Siemonsma, JS (eds) Plant Resources of South-East Asia No. 13: Spices. Leiden, Netherlands: Backhuys Publisher, pp. 233238.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, S, Ikeda, S, Imai, A, Luan, Y, Watanabe, JA and Watanabe, KN (2005) Construction of integrated genetic map between various existing DNA markers and newly developed P450-related PBA markers in diploid potato (Solanum tuberosum). Breeding Science 55: 223230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamanaka, S, Jatoi, SA, San-San-Yi, , Kothari, SL, Tin-Htut, and Watanabe, KN (2011) Genetic diversity of Myanmar rice and their implementation on management methods. African Journal of Biotechnology 10: 12901298.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, S, Suzuki, E, Tanaka, M, Takeda, Y, Watanabe, JA and Watanabe, KN (2003) Assessment of cytochrome P450 sequences offers a useful tool for determining genetic diversity in higher plant species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Variability in 22 discriminated qualitative morphological characters based on a modified descriptor list for Zingiber officinale

Figure 1

Table 2 Means, standard deviations, ranges and P-values of eight quantitative characters within all accessions and Zingiber barbatum accessions

Figure 2

Table 3 Frequency of polymorphic bands within all accessions and Zingiber barbatum accessions

Figure 3

Fig. 1 Two-dimensional plot of 19 Zingiber barbatum accessions (■), three Zingiber officinale accessions (○) and a Zingiber mioga accession (□). (a) PCs generated from 22 morphological characters with contribution rates of PC-1 and PC-2 of 42.61 and 17.11%, respectively. (b) PCs generated from molecular data with contribution rates of PC-1 and PC-2 of 25.85 and 17.39%, respectively.

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean clustering of Zingiber barbatum, Zingiber offininale and Zingiber mioga. (a) Dendrogram generated from 22 morphological characters using the Euclidean dissimilarity index. (b) Dendrogram generated from 11 P450-based analogue primer sets using the coefficient of Jaccard similarity (confidence interval was tested by bootstrapping with 1000 iterations, and only values >60% are shown).

Figure 5

Table 4 Load coefficient of each discriminated morphological character for the first three principal components (PCs)

Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 1

Gilani Supplementary Table 1

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 1(File)
File 24.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 2

Gilani Supplementary Table 2

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 2(File)
File 50.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 3

Gilani Supplementary Table 3

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 3(File)
File 21.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 4

Gilani Supplementary Table 4

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 4(File)
File 22 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 5

Gilani Supplementary Table 5

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 5(File)
File 29.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Gilani Supplementary Figure 1

Gilani Supplementary Figure 1

Download Gilani Supplementary Figure 1(Image)
Image 84.6 KB