Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T12:03:14.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exposure to low Earth orbit of an extreme-tolerant cyanobacterium as a contribution to lunar astrobiology activities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2019

Daniela Billi*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Claudia Mosca
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Claudia Fagliarone
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Alessandro Napoli
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Cyprien Verseux
Affiliation:
University of Bremen, Center of Applied Space Technology and Microgravity, Bremen, Germany
Mickael Baqué
Affiliation:
German Aerospace Center, Institute of Planetary Research, Management and Infrastructure, Astrobiological Laboratories, Berlin, Germany
Jean-Pierre de Vera
Affiliation:
German Aerospace Center, Institute of Planetary Research, Management and Infrastructure, Astrobiological Laboratories, Berlin, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Daniela Billi, E-mail: billi@uniroma2.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By investigating the survival and the biomarker detectability of a rock-inhabiting cyanobacterium, Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029, the BIOMEX space experiment might contribute to a future exploitation of the Moon as a test-bed for key astrobiology tasks such as the testing of life-detection technologies and the study of life in space. Post-flight analyses demonstrated that the mixing of dried cells with sandstone and a lunar regolith simulant provided protection against space UV radiation. During the space exposure, dried cells not mixed with minerals were killed by 2.05 × 102 kJ m−2 of UV radiation, while cells mixed with sandstone or lunar regolith survived 1.59 × 102 and 1.79 × 102 kJ m−2, respectively. No differences in survival occurred among cells mixed and not mixed with minerals and exposed to space conditions in the dark; this finding suggests that space vacuum and 0.5 Gy of ionizing radiation did not impair the cells’ presence in space. The genomic DNA of dead cells was severely damaged but still detectable with PCR amplification of a short target, thus suggesting that short sequences should be targeted in a PCR-based approach when searching for traces of life. The enhanced stability of genomic DNA of dried cells mixed with minerals and exposed to space indicates that DNA might still be detectable after prolonged periods, possibly up to millions of years in microbes shielded by minerals. Overall, the BIOMEX results contribute to future experiments regarding the exposure of cells and their biomarkers to deep space conditions in order to further test the lithopanspermia hypothesis, the biomarker stability and the microbial endurance, with implications for planetary protection and to determine if the Moon has been contaminated during past human missions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Introduction

Fifty years after Apollo 11, the Earth's natural satellite, the Moon, is again the target for manned space programs, namely with the ESA's Moon Village concept (http://exploration.esa.int/moon/59374-overview/), the NASA's Artemis program (https://www.nasa.gov/artemis/) and the Gateway, an outpost orbiting around the Moon, endorsed by the International Space Station partners (https://www.nasa.gov/feature/multilateral-coordination-board-joint-statement).

Although the Moon is hostile to life (Schuerger et al., Reference Schuerger, Moores, Smith and Reitz2019), nevertheless it is relevant to astrobiology since it may hold key information on how life developed on Earth. Its surface, lacking recent geological and erosional activities, could have preserved the organics delivered to it and to Earth during the late heavy bombardment period (Gronstal et al., Reference Gronstal, Cockell, Perino, Bittner, Clacey, Clark, Ingold, Alves de Oliveira and Wathiong2007; Crawford et al., Reference Crawford, Anand, Cockell, Falcke, Green, Jaumann and Wieczorek2012). An exogenous origin of prebiotic organics delivered by carbonaceous chondrites, comets and interstellar dust particles, all of which might have provided the first building blocks, has been suggested (for reviews see Bernstein, Reference Bernstein2006; Kitadai and Maruyama, Reference Kitadai and Maruyama2018). Although a terrestrial origin of organics was also proposed according to the Miller–Urey synthesis in the primordial atmosphere and/or through the serpentinization process in hydrothermal vents (for a review see Bernstein, Reference Bernstein2006). In addition, considering the large amount (about 200 kg km−2) of terrestrial ejecta that reached the lunar surface 3.8–3.9 Gyr ago (Koeberl, Reference Koeberl2003), a possible Earth-to-Moon transfer of microbial life inside rocks might have occurred. Indeed, the transport of microorganisms from one celestial body to another aboard planetary ejecta, resulting from impacts of asteroids and comets, has been proposed for the Earth–Mars system (Mileikowsky et al., Reference Mileikowsky, Cucinotta, Wilson, Gladman, Horneck, Lindegren, Melosh, Rickman, Valtonen and Zheng2000). Such a phenomenon, known as lithopanspermia, is constrained by three events: (i) the launch of microbe-bearing rocks from a donor planet into space; (ii) the transit through space to a recipient planet and (iii) the entry into a recipient planet (for review see Nicholson, Reference Nicholson2009). Compared to the Earth–Mars system, the transfer of rock-inhabiting microbes form the Earth to the Moon could have been easier, given the lower distance of the Moon. Moreover, the chances of surviving the landing on the Moon might have been increased by a reduced impact velocity due to the presence of a lunar atmosphere, which appeared about 3.5 Ga ago, with a lifetime of about 70 million years (Needham and Kring, Reference Needham and Kring2017). In the context of the Earth-to-Moon lithopanspermia, relevant implications depend on the possibility of the Moon having once been habitable (Schulze-Makuch and Crawford, Reference Schulze-Makuch and Crawford2018).

The Moon's surface with its high doses of ultraviolet irradiation, temperature extremes, low pressure and high levels of ionizing radiation (Schuerger et al., Reference Schuerger, Moores, Smith and Reitz2019) has a remarkable relevance when testing life-detection instrumentations (Carpenter et al., Reference Carpenter, Fisackerly, De Rosa and Houdou2012; de Vera et al., Reference de Vera, Boettger, de la Torre, Sanchez, Grunow, Schmitz, Lange, Hübers, Billi, Baqué, Rettberg, Rabbow, Reitz, Berger, Moeller, Bohmeier, Horneck, Westall, Jänchen, Fritz, Meyer, Onofri, Selbmann, Zucconi, Kozyrovska, Leya, Foing, Demets, Cockell, Bryce, Wagner, Serrano, Edwards, Joshi, Huwe, Ehrenfreund, Elsaesser, Ott, Meessen, Feyh, Szewzyk, Jaumann and Spohn2012). Currently, ground-based simulations and exposure in low Earth orbit (LEO) are used to understand how biomarkers are affected by extra-terrestrial conditions and contribute to future life detection missions (de Vera et al., Reference de Vera, Cavalazzi and Westal2019a).

A first Moon-analogue experiment was performed as part of the BIOlogy and Mars EXperiment (BIOMEX) project carried out by using the ESA EXPOSE-R2 platform installed outside the ISS in LEO from July 2014 to June 2016 (de Vera et al., Reference de Vera, Alawi, Backhaus, Baqué, Billi, Böttger, Berger, Bohmeier, Cockell, Demets, de la Torre Noetzel, Edwards, Elsaesser, Fagliarone, Fiedler, Foing, Foucher, Fritz, Hanke, Herzog, Horneck, Hübers, Huwe, Joshi, Kozyrovska, Kruchten, Lasch, Lee, Leuko, Leya, Lorek, Martínez-Frías, Meessen, Moritz, Moeller, Olsson-Francis, Onofri, Ott, Pacelli, Podolich, Rabbow, Reitz, Rettberg, Reva, Rothschild, Garcia Sancho, Schulze-Makuch, Selbmann, Serrano, Szewzyk, Verseux, Wadsworth, Wagner, Westall, Wolter and Zucconi2019b). Among the extremophiles selected for the BIOMEX space experiment, there was the rock-inhabiting cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029, isolated from sandstone in the Negev Desert. Cyanobacteria belonging to this genus survive in extremely hot and cold deserts, where they take refuge inside porous rocks or colonize soil–rock interfaces (Billi, Reference Billi2018). In particular, it was demonstrated that under laboratory conditions, Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029 tolerates at least 4 years of air-drying (Billi, Reference Billi2009; Fagliarone et al., Reference Fagliarone, Mosca, Ubaldi, Verseux, Baqué, Wilmotte and Billi2017), up to 12 kGy of γ-radiation and at least 2 kGy of Fe ions (Verseux et al., Reference Verseux, Baqué, Cifariello, Fagliarone, Raguse, Moeller and Billi2017).

The objective of the BIOMEX experiment was to investigate the endurance of extremophiles and stability of biomolecules under two simulated environments: under a Mars-like atmosphere (in contact or not with Mars regolith analogues), and under space conditions (contact with natural substrata or lunar regolith analogue). The former environment has already provided significant data concerning the habitability of Mars and the likelihood of Earth–Mars lithopanspermia (Billi et al., Reference Billi, Verseux, Fagliarone, Napoli, Baqué and de Vera2019; de Vera et al., Reference de Vera, Alawi, Backhaus, Baqué, Billi, Böttger, Berger, Bohmeier, Cockell, Demets, de la Torre Noetzel, Edwards, Elsaesser, Fagliarone, Fiedler, Foing, Foucher, Fritz, Hanke, Herzog, Horneck, Hübers, Huwe, Joshi, Kozyrovska, Kruchten, Lasch, Lee, Leuko, Leya, Lorek, Martínez-Frías, Meessen, Moritz, Moeller, Olsson-Francis, Onofri, Ott, Pacelli, Podolich, Rabbow, Reitz, Rettberg, Reva, Rothschild, Garcia Sancho, Schulze-Makuch, Selbmann, Serrano, Szewzyk, Verseux, Wadsworth, Wagner, Westall, Wolter and Zucconi2019b). The latter environment will contribute to evaluating the effects of the lunar regolith on space-exposed biosignatures in order to optimize life detection technologies to be tested on the Moon by avoiding potential pitfalls (de Vera et al., Reference de Vera, Boettger, de la Torre, Sanchez, Grunow, Schmitz, Lange, Hübers, Billi, Baqué, Rettberg, Rabbow, Reitz, Berger, Moeller, Bohmeier, Horneck, Westall, Jänchen, Fritz, Meyer, Onofri, Selbmann, Zucconi, Kozyrovska, Leya, Foing, Demets, Cockell, Bryce, Wagner, Serrano, Edwards, Joshi, Huwe, Ehrenfreund, Elsaesser, Ott, Meessen, Feyh, Szewzyk, Jaumann and Spohn2012; Fox and Strasdeit, Reference Fox and Strasdeit2017).

Here we report on the survival of dried Chroococcidiopsis cells mixed with sandstone or a lunar regolith analogue after exposure to space conditions in LEO for 672 days as well as simulated conditions on Earth during the mission ground reference (MGR). The protection provided by mixing the cells with minerals was determined by evaluating the survival threshold while the detectability of a biomarker, namely DNA, was evaluated by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-stop assays.

Material and methods

Organisms and sample preparation

Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029 (hereafter Chroococcidiopsis) was isolated by Roseli Ocampo-Friedmann from cryptoendolithic growth in sandstone in the Negev Desert (Israel) and now maintained at the University of Rome Tor Vergata, as part of the Culture Collection of Microorganisms from Extreme Environments (CCMEE) established by E. Imre Friedmann. Liquid cultures were grown under routine conditions at 25 °C, in BG-11 medium (Rippka et al., Reference Rippka, Deruelles, Waterbury, Herdman and Stanier1979), under a photon flux density of 40 µmol m−2 s−1 provided by fluorescent cool-white bulbs with a 16/8 h light/dark cycle.

In order to have 1 × 107 cells per mg of mineral mixtures, 400 µl of 5 × 109 cells per ml were mixed with: (i) 0.2 g of a lunar regolith analogue (about 100–1000 µm grain size and mainly composed of anorthosite; for details see de Vera et al., Reference de Vera, Alawi, Backhaus, Baqué, Billi, Böttger, Berger, Bohmeier, Cockell, Demets, de la Torre Noetzel, Edwards, Elsaesser, Fagliarone, Fiedler, Foing, Foucher, Fritz, Hanke, Herzog, Horneck, Hübers, Huwe, Joshi, Kozyrovska, Kruchten, Lasch, Lee, Leuko, Leya, Lorek, Martínez-Frías, Meessen, Moritz, Moeller, Olsson-Francis, Onofri, Ott, Pacelli, Podolich, Rabbow, Reitz, Rettberg, Reva, Rothschild, Garcia Sancho, Schulze-Makuch, Selbmann, Serrano, Szewzyk, Verseux, Wadsworth, Wagner, Westall, Wolter and Zucconi2019b); and (ii) 0.2 g of a red Antarctic sandstone (kindly provided by Silvano Onofri, Tuscia University, Italy) that was crushed to about 250 µm grain size. The mixing of the cells with minerals was performed on the top of 1.5% agarized BG-11 medium within a 70 mm diameter surface of a 100 mm-diameter Petri dish. After plating, samples were air-dried under a laminar flow hood for 2 days, in the dark and then cut in 12 mm-diameter disks. Disks were stored in the dark at room temperature until exposure (MGR and flight samples) or throughout the mission (laboratory controls). Controls were prepared by plating 40 µl aliquots of 5 × 1010 cells per ml onto agarized BG-11 medium without adding minerals.

Exposure in low Earth orbit and mission ground reference

In the EXPOSE-R2 flight hardware, dried cells mixed with lunar analogue or smashed sandstone were accommodated in the compartment 1 of a two-layer stacked sample carrier (Tray 1) while control, dried samples not mixed with minerals (part of the BOSS experiment) were accommodated in the compartment 4 of Tray 1 (Fig. 1(a)).

Fig. 1. EXPOSE-R2 flight hardware with Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029 distribution. Tray 1 compartment 1 with dried cells mixed with sandstone or lunar regolith simulant, and compartment 4 with dried cells not mixed with minerals; sample in the top-layer (t) and in the bottom-layer (b) carrier (a). Visual inspection of samples exposed in space and MGR; reddish spots are due to the glue used for the sample integration (b). Total UV dose received during the flight and MGR (c). Photo credits: Roscosmos, ESA. MGR: mission ground reference.

Tray 1 was covered with MgF2 windows for exposure to space UV radiation (λ > 120 nm) under space vacuum. Samples were further covered with 0.1% neutral density (ND) filters, attenuating solar UV radiation by approximately 3 orders of magnitude (Rabbow et al., Reference Rabbow, Rettberg, Parpart, Panitz, Schulte, Molter, Jaramillo, Demets, Weiß and Willnecker2017). In this two-layer stacked conformation, top samples were exposed to solar UV radiation, while bottom samples in the lower carrier were completely shaded, providing the in-flight dark controls. Both layers were subjected to ionizing radiation exposure from solar energetic particles, galactic cosmic rays and trapped within the radiation belts, estimated to have reached approximately 0.5 Gy of absorbed dose during the EXPOSE-R2 mission (Dachev et al., Reference Dachev, Bankov, Tomov, Matviichuk, Dimitrov, Häder and Horneck2017). Chroococcidiopsis samples were sent back to the University of Rome Tor Vergata for analysis after about 900 days from the integration of the mission.

A simulation of the flight mission, the MGR, was performed at DLR's Microgravity User Support Center in Cologne (Rabbow et al., Reference Rabbow, Parpart and Reitz2016) by using duplicates of the flight samples that were kept in a flight-similar hardware exposed to conditions simulating the flight mission, based on transmitted data and the capabilities of the simulation facilities (Rabbow et al., Reference Rabbow, Rettberg, Parpart, Panitz, Schulte, Molter, Jaramillo, Demets, Weiß and Willnecker2017). Control samples were stored in the dark at room temperature throughout the mission (laboratory control).

Cell viability

Cell viability of each dried sample was assessed by inoculating about 2 × 107 cells (from about 25 mm2 fragments) into 2 ml of BG11 medium in a 15 ml sterile Falcon tube. After 3 months of growth under routine growth conditions, cell densities were inferred from optical density measurements at 730 nm (OD 730 nm) with a spectrophotometer.

Evaluation of genomic DNA integrity by PCR-stop assays

Sample fragments (about 2 mm2) were resuspended in 50 µl of sterile bidistilled water and the removed cells washed twice and resuspended in 20 µl of sterile bidistilled water. Genomic DNA was extracted by performing three cycles of freeze–thawing (−80 °C for 10 min and 60 °C for 1 min) followed by 10 min boiling. After centrifugation, DNA concentrations were determined using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit and a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The following PCR-stop assays were used.

Single-gene PCR

A 1027-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by using the primers CYA-359F (5′-GGGGAATTTTCCGCAATGG-3′) and CRev (5′-ACGGGCGGTGTGTAC-3′), 0.5 µM each, in 12 µl PCR reaction mixtures containing genomic DNA (6 ng) and 6 µl of MyTaq™ Red Mix (Bioline). PCR conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 45 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 3 min; and 7 min at 72 °C.

A 500-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primers 029-16SF2 (5′-GGAGTGCGGTAGGGGTAGAG-3′) and 029-16SR2 (5′-CTAGAGTGCCCAACTTAATGCT-3′), 0.5 µM each, in 12 µl PCR reaction mixtures containing genomic DNA (15 ng) and 6 µl of MyTaqTM Red Mix (Bioline). PCR conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 45 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s; and 7 min at 72 °C.

Genome PCR fingerprinting

PCR reaction mixtures of 25 µl were prepared using 12.5 µl of Taq polymerase Master Mix (MyTaq TM Red Mix, Bioline), genomic DNA (50 ng) and 2 µM of HIP1-CA primer (5′-GCGATCGC-CA-3′) derived from the Highly Iterated Palindrome (HIP1) sequence. The following PCR program was used: 94 °C for 3 min 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 37 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 7 min as previously optimized for Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029 (Billi, Reference Billi2009).

Results

Visual inspection of cells mixed and not mixed with lunar regolith analogue or sandstone after space exposure

After the EXPOSE-R2 space mission, samples of Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029 were removed from the top- and bottom-layer carriers of Tray 1 (Fig. 1(a)) and from the hardware used for the MGR. Visual inspection of the dried samples not mixed with minerals from the top-layer carrier of the hardware exposed in LEO and in the MGR revealed a yellowish-green colouration, due to pigments bleaching, as opposed to the blue-green samples from the bottom-layer carriers (Fig. 1(b)). For the top-layer carrier of the flight and ground hardware, cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue or sandstone showed a slight yellowish-green colouration compared to green samples from the bottom-layer carrier (Fig. 1(b)). Laboratory controls retained a blue-green colouration (Fig. 1(b)).

Calculations provided by RedShift showed that during the space mission, each sample was exposed to a different UV dose depending on its position within the compartment (Fig. 1(c)). Chroococcidiopsis cells mixed with lunar regolith (position 1-1-t-12) and mixed with sandstone (position 1-1-t-16) received a UV + PAR dose of 3.0 × 103 kJ m−2 and 2.77 × 103 kJ m−2, respectively. While cells not mixed with minerals (position 2-4-t-15) received a UV + PAR dose of 4.26 × 103 kJ m−2, corresponding to 1.79 × 102, 1.59 × 102 and 2.05 × 102 kJ m−2 of UV radiation (200–400 nm), respectively (Fig. 1(c)). During the MGR, each compartment was exposed to the mean UV radiation (200–400 nm) fluency, as transmitted during the space mission (Rabbow et al., Reference Rabbow, Rettberg, Parpart, Panitz, Schulte, Molter, Jaramillo, Demets, Weiß and Willnecker2017) (Fig. 1(c)).

Dried cells survived space conditions when mixed with lunar regolith analogue or sandstone

Post-flight analyses were performed on Chroococcidiopsis samples after storage in the dried state for about 2.5 years due to the time required for sample preparation, integration into the flight hardware, EXPOSE-R2 space mission (696 days from launch to landing) and distribution to the various laboratories after retrieval (about 900 days from launch to sample return to the laboratory).

The viability of dried Chroococcidiopsis cells exposed to space conditions in LEO or in MGR was evaluated by determining the culture densities (OD730 nm) 3 months after the inoculum of about 2 × 107 cells into liquid BG11 medium (Table 1).

Table 1. Viability of dried Chroococcidiopsis mixed or not mixed with Lunar regolith simulant and sandstone and exposed to space conditions (Flight), Mission Ground Reference (MGR) and under laboratory conditions (Laboratory control). Viability was determined by measuring the increase in optical density at 730 nm (OD730nm) of liquid cultures obtained from 2 × 107 cells after 3 months of growth (B). Top: exposed in the top-layer carrier. Bottom: exposed in the bottom-layer carrier

After exposure in LEO to UV irradiation, space vacuum and cosmic radiation (i.e. top-layer carrier), only cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue or sandstone recovered in the liquid medium. The recorded OD730nm values for cultures obtained from cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue or sandstone were reduced to 38 and 51%, respectively, of the value obtained for dried cells stored in the laboratory throughout the space mission (laboratory control).

Similarly, after the MGR, in which dried cells were exposed to UV irradiation and space vacuum, only cells mixed with minerals underwent cell division after transfer into liquid growth medium, although they reached OD730nm values of 19 and 28% compared to dried cells stored in the laboratory (Table 1). Dried cells mixed or not mixed with minerals and exposed in the dark to space vacuum and cosmic radiation (i.e. bottom-layer carrier) or exposed during the MGR in the dark to simulated space vacuum showed OD730nm values ranging from 80 to 76% of the OD730nm of laboratory control (Table 1).

Intact genomic DNA in cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue after space exposure

The effect of space exposure on the genome integrity was evaluated by assessing its suitability as a PCR template.

When the amplification of a 1027-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was attempted on the genomic DNA of dried cells exposed in LEO to UV irradiation, space vacuum and cosmic radiation (i.e. top-layer carrier), no amplicons were obtained from cells not mixed with minerals (Fig. 2, lane 3). Cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue did not yield a PCR amplicon (Fig. 2, lane 8) in contrast to cells mixed with sandstone that yielded a very faint PCR band (Fig. 2, lane 13). An intense PCR band was obtained from laboratory control, i.e. dried cells not mixed with minerals and stored in the dark throughout the space mission (Fig. 2 lane 2), as well as from dried, laboratory control cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue (Fig. 2, lane 5) or with sandstone (Fig. 2, lane 10). When the amplification of the 1027-bp fragment was carried out on dried cells exposed in the dark to space vacuum and ionizing radiation (e.g. bottom-layer carrier), cells mixed or not with minerals yielded intense PCR amplicons (Fig. 2, lanes 4, 9, 14).

Fig. 2. Evaluation of DNA integrity by PCR amplification of a 1027-bp gene target. Laboratory: dried cells stored under laboratory conditions; Flight: space conditions in LEO; MGR: mission ground reference; t: top-layer carrier; b: bottom-layer carrier; No-mineral: dried cells not mixed with minerals; Lunar: dried cells mixed with lunar regolith simulant; Sandstone: dried cells mixed with natural substratum; MW: DNA ladder (Hyperladder 1 kbp, Bioline).

During the MGR, the exposure of dried cells mixed with minerals to simulated space UV radiation and vacuum resulted in PCR amplicons of reduced intensity (Fig. 2, lanes 6, 11) compared to bands obtained from cells exposed in the dark (Fig. 2, lane 7, 12).

When the amplification of a shorter 500-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was attempted by using genomic DNA from dried cells exposed to LEO conditions in the top-layer carrier position, amplicons were obtained from cells not mixed with minerals (Fig. 3 lane 3), mixed with lunar regolith analogue (Fig. 3 lane 8) or mixed with sandstone (Fig. 3 lane 13). A similar result was obtained for cells from the top-layer carrier position of the MGR (Fig. 3 lanes 6, 11) as well as from the bottom-layer carrier position (Fig. 3 lanes 7, 12). A 500-bp band was obtained from laboratory controls, including cells not mixed with minerals (Fig. 3, lane 2,) and cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue (Fig. 3, lane 5) or sandstone (Fig. 3, lane 10).

Fig. 3. Evaluation of DNA integrity by PCR amplification of a 500-bp gene target. Laboratory: dried cells stored under laboratory conditions; Flight: space conditions in LEO; MGR: mission ground reference; t: top-layer carrier; b: bottom-layer carrier; No-mineral: dried cells not mixed with minerals; Lunar: dried cells mixed with lunar regolith simulant; Sandstone: dried cells mixed with natural substratum; MW: DNA ladder (Hyperladder 100 bp, Bioline).

When the DNA integrity was evaluated by performing genome PCR fingerprinting, after exposure in LEO (i.e. top-layer carrier), dried cells not mixed with minerals yielded no amplicons (Fig. 4 lane 3), while a band profile was obtained from laboratory control, i.e. dried cells not mixed with minerals and stored in the dark throughout the space mission (Fig. 4, lane 2). Dried cells mixed with minerals form the top-layer carrier yielded band profiles with a slight reduction in the intensity of the low-size bands and lacking the higher-size bands (Fig. 4 lanes 8, 13). While the band profile of dried cells exposed in LEO in the dark (e.g. bottom-layer carrier) was virtually identical to that of laboratory controls, i.e. cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue (Fig. 4, lane 5) and with sandstone (Fig. 4, lane 10).

Fig. 4. Evaluation of DNA integrity by genome PCR fingerprinting. Laboratory: dried cells stored under laboratory conditions; Flight: space conditions in LEO; MGR: mission ground reference; t: top-layer carrier; b: bottom-layer carrier; No-mineral: dried cells not mixed with minerals; Lunar: dried cells mixed with lunar regolith simulant; Sandstone: dried cells mixed with natural substratum; MW: DNA ladder (Hyperladder 100 bp, Bioline).

Discussion

By investigating among other topics, the survival and the biomarker detectability of the rock-inhabiting cyanobacterium, Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029, the BIOMEX space experiment might contribute to a future exploitation of the Moon as a test-bed for key astrobiology tasks such as the testing of life-detection technologies and the study of life in space.

During the EXPOSE-R2 space mission, the shielding against UV radiation provided by minerals led to the survival of dried Chroococcidiopsis cells exposed to solar UV radiation (in top-layer carrier). In compartment 1 of Tray 1, a few cells mixed with sandstone or lunar regolith survived 1.59 × 102 and 1.79 × 102 kJm−2 of UV radiation, respectively, while in compartment 4 of Tray 1, cells not mixed with minerals were eradicated by 2.05 × 102 kJ m−2 of UV radiation (Fig. 1). The differences in the UV doses within the EXPOSE-R2 hardware were due to the ISS shadowing (Rabbow et al., Reference Rabbow, Rettberg, Parpart, Panitz, Schulte, Molter, Jaramillo, Demets, Weiß and Willnecker2017). In addition, solar UV radiation was attenuated with 0.1% ND filters as suggested by the ground-based simulations performed before the space mission. In fact, dried Chroococcidiopsis cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue survived 1.5 × 103 kJ m−2 of UV radiation, but not 1.5 × 104 kJ m−2 and were killed by a UV dose of 5 × 102 kJ m−2 when combined with space vacuum (Baqué et al., Reference Baqué, Verseux, Rabbow, de Vera and Billi2014).

During the MGR, samples were exposed to UV doses higher than their counterparts in space due to the fact that each compartment was exposed to a mean UV radiation fluency, as transmitted during the space mission, combined with simulated space vacuum (Rabbow et al., Reference Rabbow, Rettberg, Parpart, Panitz, Schulte, Molter, Jaramillo, Demets, Weiß and Willnecker2017). Hence in compartment 4 of Tray 1, cells not mixed with minerals were killed by 5.05 × 102 kJ m−2 of UV radiation, whereas in compartment 1 of Tray 1, cells mixed with sandstone or lunar regolith survived 4.39 × 102 kJ m−2 of UV radiation. Overall, the scored survival matched the threshold UV dose of 5 × 102 kJ m−2, combined with space vacuum, as reported during the ground-based simulations (Baqué et al., Reference Baqué, Verseux, Rabbow, de Vera and Billi2014).

The mixing of Chroococcidiopsis cells in the proportion of 1 × 107 cells per mg of minerals yielded survivors after exposure to 1.79 × 102 kJ m−2 of UV radiation received during the space mission, and to 4.39 × 102 kJ m−2 during the MGR (see below). These results are in line with the observation that mineral grains act as a shield against UV radiation for cells located beneath them (Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Rettberg, Reitz, Wehner, Eschweiler, Strauch, Panitz, Starke and Baumstark-Khan2001). Indeed, the SURVIVAL experiment performed during the BIOPAN space flights demonstrated that unprotected layers of bacterial spores were completely or nearly completely inactivated, whereas an increased survival occurred when 2.5 × 109 spores per ml were mixed with 100 mg ml−1 of powdered sandstone or 10 mg mL−1 of powdered meteorite (Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Rettberg, Reitz, Wehner, Eschweiler, Strauch, Panitz, Starke and Baumstark-Khan2001).

Although the EXPOSE-R2 space mission exposure conditions exceeded the survival potential of Chroococcidiopsis cells unshielded by minerals, insights were provided into the detectability of traces of DNA-based life forms. In fact, the deeply damaged genomic DNA of Chroococcidiopsis cells killed by space UV radiation was still detectable by PCR by using a 500-bp target; by contrast, the PCR amplification of 1027-bp target and genome fingerprinting failed. Indeed, lesions block the DNA polymerase progression on the template, resulting in decreased/absent amplicons (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Tyagi and Jha2004). Moreover, compared to the amplification of short targets, longer ones are impaired, due to the higher likelihood of encountering DNA lesions (Rudi et al., Reference Rudi, Hagen, Johnsrud, Skjefstad and Tryland2010).

On the other hand, the mixing of dried Chroococcidiopsis cells with sandstone increased the detectability of genomic DNA after space exposure, leading to successful PCR amplifications of both short and long targets (500 and 1027-bp gene fragments) and genome PCR fingerprinting. The lack of the 1027-bp amplification in cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue and exposed in LEO was a puzzling result, possibly due to the occurrence in this DNA sequence of lesions, such as cross-links with proteins or carbohydrates which severely impair DNA polymerase progression (Shirkey et al., Reference Shirkey, McMaster, Smith, Wright, Rodriguez, Jaruga, Birincioglu, Helm and Potts2003). Indeed, positive amplifications were obtained from cells mixed with lunar regolith analogue and exposed in LEO when attempting not only the 500-bp amplification but also the genome PCR fingerprinting.

The detectability of extensively damaged DNA by means of short-target PCR amplification could be relevant when searching for traces of DNA-based life, for instance due to microbial transfer via lithopanspermia. By taking advantage of miniaturization technologies, such as the Oxford Nanopore's MinION (Loman and Watson, Reference Loman and Watson2015), a PCR-based approach has been proposed in order to detect possible remains of life on Mars (Carr et al., Reference Carr, Rowedder, Vafadari, Lui, Cascio, Zuber and Ruvkun2013). At the same time, short-target PCR amplification could detect traces of dead microbes present on the external surfaces of spacecraft landed on the Moon (Schuerger et al., Reference Schuerger, Moores, Smith and Reitz2019).

Due to the low ionizing radiation rates occurring in LEO, the EXPOSE-R2 space mission came to no conclusion regarding DNA detectability after prolonged exposure on the Moon. Nevertheless, it was previously demonstrated that the genomic DNA of dried Chroococcidiopsis cells exposed to 113 kGy of γ radiation was still suitable for amplifying a 1027-bp target and for yielding genome PCR fingerprints, although with altered band profiles (Verseux et al., Reference Verseux, Baqué, Cifariello, Fagliarone, Raguse, Moeller and Billi2017). Cells mixed with minerals and exposed to high ionizing radiation doses are expected to show an increased DNA stability. Indeed, in the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. CCCryo 231-06, it was reported that carotenoids were detectable after exposure to up to 56 kGy, while cells mixed with Martian mineral analogues showed totally preserved carotenoids after exposure to 117 kGy (Baqué et al., Reference Baqué, Hanke, Böttger, Leya, Moeller and de Vera2018). Therefore, considering that the lunar surface is annually exposed to doses ranging from around 100 mGy to 1 Gy (depending on solar activity and solar particle events) of cosmic rays (Reitz et al., Reference Reitz, Berger and Matthiae2012), DNA might be detectable after hundreds of thousands to millions of years and, potentially, even after longer periods in cells mixed with minerals. Hence a DNA-based approach might be applied in searching for life in other astrobiology-relevant targets: however, its success depends on a shared ancestry hypothesis, this being less and less likely as one proceeds deeper into the Solar System (Johnson et al., Reference Johnson, Anslyn, Graham, Mahaffy and Ellington2018).

In addition, by investigating the survival of cells mixed with regoliths and exposed in LEO, the BIOMEX space experiment has contributed to testing the likelihood of the lithopanspermia hypothesis (de Vera et al., Reference de Vera, Boettger, de la Torre, Sanchez, Grunow, Schmitz, Lange, Hübers, Billi, Baqué, Rettberg, Rabbow, Reitz, Berger, Moeller, Bohmeier, Horneck, Westall, Jänchen, Fritz, Meyer, Onofri, Selbmann, Zucconi, Kozyrovska, Leya, Foing, Demets, Cockell, Bryce, Wagner, Serrano, Edwards, Joshi, Huwe, Ehrenfreund, Elsaesser, Ott, Meessen, Feyh, Szewzyk, Jaumann and Spohn2012; de Vera et al., Reference de Vera, Alawi, Backhaus, Baqué, Billi, Böttger, Berger, Bohmeier, Cockell, Demets, de la Torre Noetzel, Edwards, Elsaesser, Fagliarone, Fiedler, Foing, Foucher, Fritz, Hanke, Herzog, Horneck, Hübers, Huwe, Joshi, Kozyrovska, Kruchten, Lasch, Lee, Leuko, Leya, Lorek, Martínez-Frías, Meessen, Moritz, Moeller, Olsson-Francis, Onofri, Ott, Pacelli, Podolich, Rabbow, Reitz, Rettberg, Reva, Rothschild, Garcia Sancho, Schulze-Makuch, Selbmann, Serrano, Szewzyk, Verseux, Wadsworth, Wagner, Westall, Wolter and Zucconi2019b). Space exposure is one of the major constraints to the interplanetary transport of microbes inside rocks, as well as the ejection from one celestial object and entry into another one (Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Rettberg, Reitz, Wehner, Eschweiler, Strauch, Panitz, Starke and Baumstark-Khan2001). Solar UV radiation is immediately lethal due to its high energy efficiently absorbed by biological macromolecules; however, it is relatively easily shielded against (Nicholson et al., Reference Nicholson, Schuerger and Setlow2005). It was previously reported that covering dried cells of Chroococcidiopsis CCMEE 123 (from coastal desert, Chile) with 3 mm of smashed sandstone ensured its survival under 1.5 × 105 kJ m−2 of UV radiation (Billi et al., Reference Billi, Viaggiu, Cockell, Rabbow, Horneck and Onofri2011).

Another factor limiting microbial survival in space is vacuum (Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Bücker and Reitz1994). During the EXPOSE-R2 space mission, dried Chroococcidiopsis cells exposed in the bottom-layer carrier experienced a vacuum ranging from 1.33 × 10−3 to 1.33 × 10−4 Pa and combined with a total dose of ionizing radiation of about 0.5 Gy (Dachev et al., Reference Dachev, Bankov, Tomov, Matviichuk, Dimitrov, Häder and Horneck2017). During the MGR, samples in the bottom-layer carrier were exposed to 1 × 10−5–6 × 10−5 Pa, although in the absence of ionizing radiation (Rabbow et al., Reference Rabbow, Rettberg, Parpart, Panitz, Schulte, Molter, Jaramillo, Demets, Weiß and Willnecker2017). However, the survival of dried cells exposed in the dark in LEO (i.e. vacuum and ionizing radiation) did not differ from that of cells exposed in the dark during the MGR (i.e. only vacuum). The cyanobacterial endurance after 672 days of space vacuum might be ascribable to its desiccation tolerance (Fagliarone et al., Reference Fagliarone, Mosca, Ubaldi, Verseux, Baqué, Wilmotte and Billi2017). Such a capability is likely due to the accumulation of disaccharides (Billi et al., Reference Billi, Baqué, Verseux, Rothschild, de Vera., Stan-Lotter and Fendrihan2017), which may stabilize sub-cellular structures and macromolecules during the extreme dehydration induced by vacuum (Nicholson et al., Reference Nicholson, Munakata, Horneck, Melosh and Setlow2000). Indeed bacterial spores embedded in chemical protectants, e.g. disaccharides, survived 6 years under space vacuum during the Long Duration Exposure Facility experiment (Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Bücker and Reitz1994).

The absence of an evident reduction in the survival of Chroococcidiopsis exposed to 0.5 Gy of ionizing radiation was something expected in view of its capability to cope with 12 kGy of γ radiation and at least 2 kGy of Fe ions (Verseux et al., Reference Verseux, Baqué, Cifariello, Fagliarone, Raguse, Moeller and Billi2017). Indeed, an enhanced desiccation and radiation tolerance would be needed when microbes are ejected into space in order to face the lethal effects of cosmic and solar radiation combined with space vacuum (Nicholson, Reference Nicholson2009). Therefore, even if galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events are limiting factors for microbial survival in space (Ferrari and Szuszkiewicz, Reference Ferrari and Szuszkiewicz2009), one could hypothesize a prolonged survival of this cyanobacterium when protected by rocky materials.

Ejection from a donor planet and entry into a recipient one also limit the interplanetary transfer of microbes inside rocks (Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Bücker and Reitz1994). It has been demonstrated that Chroococcidiopsis survives simulated impact ejections with shock pressures up to 10 GPa (Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Stöffler, Ott, Hornemann, Cockell, Möller, Meyer, de Vera, Fritz, Schade and Artemieva2008). Yet during the STONE space experiment, Chroococcidiopsis cells inoculated 5 mm depth into gneiss rocks were killed during the re-entry process of the Foton-M capsule (Cockell et al., Reference Cockell, Brack, Wynn-Williams, Baglioni, Brandstätter, Demets, Edwards, Gronstal, Kurat, Lee, Osinski, Pearce, Pillinger, Roten and Sancisi-Frey2007). Therefore, it was suggested that atmospheric transit may prevent the dispersal of endolithic phototrophs because the re-entry heat ablates and heats the rocks to temperatures that exceed the upper temperature limit for life (Cockell et al., Reference Cockell, Brack, Wynn-Williams, Baglioni, Brandstätter, Demets, Edwards, Gronstal, Kurat, Lee, Osinski, Pearce, Pillinger, Roten and Sancisi-Frey2007). Nevertheless, it has been hypothesized that an enhanced survival during atmospheric transit could occur in the case of chasmoendoliths inhabiting deep fractures or deeply buried within rocks, both being possibilities in nature under peculiar situations (Cockell, Reference Cockell2008). Indeed cyanobacteria related to endolithic and hypolithic representatives of genus Calothrix, Chroococcidiopsis and Microcoleus were recently detected in deep subsurface rock samples (Puente-Sánchez et al., Reference Puente-Sánchez, Arce-Rodríguez, Oggerin, García-Villadangos, Moreno-Paz, Blanco, Rodríguez, Bird, Lincoln, Tornos, Prieto-Ballesteros, Freeman, Pieper, Timmis, Amils and Parro2018).

In conclusion, BIOMEX results contribute to the future exploitation of the Moon as a test-bed to unravel key questions dealing with the origin of life on Earth, the limits and adaptation of life beyond Earth, the testing of life-detection technologies and the development of biological life-support systems (Cockell, Reference Cockell2010). Indeed the Moon could be used as a natural laboratory for unravelling microbial behaviour over several generations (Cockell, Reference Cockell2010), thus contributing to their use in biological life support systems (Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Klaus and Mancinelli2010). Future experiments regarding prolonged exposure of cells and their biomarkers to a severe ionizing environment will further test the likelihood of the lithopanspermia hypothesis, but they will also allow a deeper understanding of biomarker stability. Additionally, this research has implications for planetary protection and determining if the Moon has been contaminated during past human missions.

In this context, the use of future platforms on the Moon's surface or orbiting around it, e.g. the Gateway, will require the real-time monitoring of microbial activities, possibly by using gene expression reporters such as the green fluorescent protein, a method already applied to Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029 (Billi, Reference Billi and Méndez-Vilas2010, Reference Billi2012).

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Italian Space Agency (BIOMEX-Cyano 051-R.0 and Biosign-Cyano 2018-15-U.O grants to D.B.), by the German Helmholtz Association through the Helmholtz-Alliance ‘Planetary Evolution and Life’ and by the German Humboldt Foundation. We thank Dr Elke Rabbow (DLR Cologne) for performing the ground-based simulations and Dr René Demets (ESA) for supporting the EXPOSE experiments.

References

Baqué, M, Verseux, C, Rabbow, E, de Vera, J-P and Billi, D (2014) Detection of macromolecules in desert cyanobacteria mixed with a lunar mineral analogue after space simulations. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 44, 209222.Google Scholar
Baqué, M, Hanke, F, Böttger, U, Leya, T, Moeller, R and de Vera, J-P (2018) Protection of cyanobacterial carotenoids’ Raman signatures by Martian mineral analogues after high-dose gamma irradiation. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 49, 16171627.Google Scholar
Bernstein, M (2006) Prebiotic materials from on and off the early Earth. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361, 16891700.Google Scholar
Billi, D (2009) Subcellular integrities in Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029 survivors after prolonged desiccation revealed by molecular probes and genome stability assays. Extremophiles 13, 4957.Google Scholar
Billi, D (2010) Genetic tools for desiccation-, radiation-tolerant cyanobacteria of the genus Chroococcidiopsis. In Méndez-Vilas, A (ed.), Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology. Badajoz, Spain: Formatex Research Center, pp. 15171521.Google Scholar
Billi, D (2012) Plasmid stability in dried cells of the desert cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis and its potential for GFP imaging of survivors on Earth and in space. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 42, 235245Google Scholar
Billi, D (2018) Desert cyanobacteria under space and planetary simulations: a tool for searching for life beyond Earth and supporting human space exploration. International Journal of Astrobiology 17.Google Scholar
Billi, D, Viaggiu, E, Cockell, CS, Rabbow, E, Horneck, G and Onofri, S (2011) Damage escape and repair in dried Chroococcidiopsis spp. from hot and cold deserts exposed to simulated space and Martian conditions. Astrobiology 11, 6573.Google Scholar
Billi, D, Baqué, M, Verseux, C, Rothschild, LJ and de Vera., J-P (2017) Desert cyanobacteria – potential for space and Earth applications. In Stan-Lotter, H and Fendrihan, S (eds), Adaption of Microbial Life to Environmental Extremes. Novel Research Results and Application, 2nd edn edn. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 133146.Google Scholar
Billi, D, Verseux, C, Fagliarone, C, Napoli, A, Baqué, M and de Vera, J-P (2019) A desert cyanobacterium under simulated Mars-like conditions in low Earth orbit: implications for the habitability of Mars. Astrobiology 19, 158169.Google Scholar
Carpenter, JD, Fisackerly, R, De Rosa, D and Houdou, B (2012) Scientific preparations for lunar exploration with the European Lunar lander. Planetary and Space Science 74, 208223.Google Scholar
Carr, CE, Rowedder, H, Vafadari, C, Lui, CS, Cascio, E, Zuber, MT and Ruvkun, G (2013) Radiation resistance of biological reagents for in situ life detection. Astrobiology 13, 6878.Google Scholar
Cockell, CS (2008) The interplanetary exchange of photosynthesis. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 38, 87104.Google Scholar
Cockell, CS (2010) Astrobiology – what can we do on the Moon?. Earth, Moon, and Planets 107, 310.Google Scholar
Cockell, CS, Brack, A, Wynn-Williams, DD, Baglioni, P, Brandstätter, F, Demets, R, Edwards, HG, Gronstal, AL, Kurat, G, Lee, P, Osinski, GR, Pearce, DA, Pillinger, JM, Roten, CA and Sancisi-Frey, S (2007) Interplanetary transfer of photosynthesis: an experimental demonstration of a selective dispersal filter in planetary island biogeography. Astrobiology 7, 19.Google Scholar
Crawford, IA, Anand, M, Cockell, CS, Falcke, HDE, Green, DA, Jaumann, R and Wieczorek, MA (2012) Back to the Moon: the scientific rationale for resuming lunar surface exploration. Planetary and Space Science 64, 314.Google Scholar
Dachev, TP, Bankov, NG, Tomov, BT, Matviichuk, YN, Dimitrov, PG, Häder, D-P and Horneck, G (2017) Overview of the ISS radiation environment observed during the ESA EXPOSE-R2 mission in 2014–2016. Space Weather 15, 2016SW001580.Google Scholar
de Vera, J-P and The Life Detection Group of BIOMEX/BioSigN (2019 a) A systematic way to life detection – combining field, lab and space research in low Earth orbit. In Cavalazzi, B and Westal, F (eds), Biosignatures for Astrobiology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 111122.Google Scholar
de Vera, J-P, Boettger, U, de la Torre, R, Sanchez, FJ, Grunow, D, Schmitz, N, Lange, C, Hübers, H-W, Billi, D, Baqué, M, Rettberg, P, Rabbow, E, Reitz, G, Berger, T, Moeller, R, Bohmeier, M, Horneck, G, Westall, F, Jänchen, J, Fritz, J, Meyer, C, Onofri, S, Selbmann, L, Zucconi, L, Kozyrovska, N, Leya, T, Foing, B, Demets, R, Cockell, CS, Bryce, C, Wagner, D, Serrano, P, Edwards, HGM, Joshi, J, Huwe, B, Ehrenfreund, P, Elsaesser, A, Ott, S, Meessen, J, Feyh, N, Szewzyk, U, Jaumann, R and Spohn, T (2012) Supporting Mars exploration: BIOMEX in Low Earth Orbit and further astrobiological studies on the Moon using Raman and PanCam technology. Planetary and Space Science 74, 103110.Google Scholar
de Vera, J-P, Alawi, M, Backhaus, T, Baqué, M, Billi, D, Böttger, U, Berger, T, Bohmeier, M, Cockell, CS, Demets, R, de la Torre Noetzel, R, Edwards, H, Elsaesser, A, Fagliarone, C, Fiedler, A, Foing, B, Foucher, F, Fritz, J, Hanke, F, Herzog, T, Horneck, G, Hübers, H-W, Huwe, B, Joshi, J, Kozyrovska, N, Kruchten, M, Lasch, P, Lee, N, Leuko, S, Leya, T, Lorek, A, Martínez-Frías, J, Meessen, J, Moritz, S, Moeller, R, Olsson-Francis, K, Onofri, S, Ott, S, Pacelli, C, Podolich, O, Rabbow, E, Reitz, G, Rettberg, P, Reva, O, Rothschild, L., Garcia Sancho, L., Schulze-Makuch, D., Selbmann, L., Serrano, P, Szewzyk, U, Verseux, C, Wadsworth, J, Wagner, D, Westall, F, Wolter, D and Zucconi, L (2019 b) Limits of life and the habitability of Mars: the ESA space experiment BIOMEX on the ISS. Astrobiology 19, 145157.Google Scholar
Fagliarone, C, Mosca, C, Ubaldi, I, Verseux, C, Baqué, M, Wilmotte, A and Billi, D (2017) Avoidance of protein oxidation correlates with the desiccation and radiation resistance of hot and cold desert strains of the cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis. Extremophiles 21, 981991.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F and Szuszkiewicz, E (2009) Cosmic rays: a review for astrobiologists. Astrobiology 9, 413436.Google Scholar
Fox, S and Strasdeit, H (2017) Inhabited or uninhabited? Pitfalls in the interpretation of possible chemical signatures of extraterrestrial life. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, 1622.Google Scholar
Gronstal, A, Cockell, CS, Perino, MA, Bittner, T, Clacey, E, Clark, O, Ingold, O, Alves de Oliveira, C and Wathiong, S (2007) Lunar astrobiology: a review and suggested laboratory equipment. Astrobiology 7, 767782.Google Scholar
Horneck, G, Bücker, H and Reitz, G (1994) Long-term survival of bacterial spores in space. Advances in Space Research 14, 4145.Google Scholar
Horneck, G, Rettberg, P, Reitz, G, Wehner, J, Eschweiler, U, Strauch, K, Panitz, C, Starke, V and Baumstark-Khan, C (2001) Protection of bacterial spores in space, a contribution to the discussion on Panspermia. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 31, 527547.Google Scholar
Horneck, G, Stöffler, D, Ott, S, Hornemann, U, Cockell, CS, Möller, R, Meyer, C, de Vera, J-P, Fritz, J, Schade, S and Artemieva, N (2008) Microbial rock inhabitants survive hypervelocity impacts on Mars-like host planets: first phase of lithopanspermia experimentally tested. Astrobiology 8, 1744.Google Scholar
Horneck, G, Klaus, DM and Mancinelli, RL (2010) Space microbiology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 74, 121156.Google Scholar
Johnson, SS, Anslyn, EV, Graham, HV, Mahaffy, PR and Ellington, AD (2018) Fingerprinting non-terran biosignatures. Astrobiology 18, 915922.Google Scholar
Kitadai, N and Maruyama, S (2018) Origins of building blocks of life: a review. Geoscience Frontiers 9, 11171153.Google Scholar
Koeberl, C (2003) The late heavy bombardment in the inner Solar System: Is there any connection to Kuiper Belt Objects? Earth, Moon, and Planets 92, 7987.Google Scholar
Kumar, A, Tyagi, MB and Jha, PN (2004) Evidences showing ultraviolet-B radiation-induced damage of DNA in cyanobacteria and its detection by PCR assay. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 318, 10251030.Google Scholar
Loman, NJ and Watson, M (2015) Successful test launch for nanopore sequencing. Nature Methods 12, 303304.Google Scholar
Mileikowsky, C, Cucinotta, FA, Wilson, JW, Gladman, B, Horneck, G, Lindegren, L, Melosh, J, Rickman, H, Valtonen, M and Zheng, JQ (2000) Natural transfer of viable microbes in space. Icarus 145, 391427.Google Scholar
Needham, DH and Kring, DA (2017) Lunar volcanism produced a transient atmosphere around the ancient Moon. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 478, 175178.Google Scholar
Nicholson, WL (2009) Ancient micronauts: interplanetary transport of microbes by cosmic impacts. Trends in Microbiology 17, 243250.Google Scholar
Nicholson, WL, Munakata, N, Horneck, G, Melosh, HJ and Setlow, P (2000) Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 64, 548572.Google Scholar
Nicholson, WL, Schuerger, AC and Setlow, P (2005) The solar UV environment and bacterial spore UV resistance: considerations for Earth-to-Mars transport by natural processes and human spaceflight. Mutation Research 571, 249264.Google Scholar
Puente-Sánchez, F, Arce-Rodríguez, A, Oggerin, M, García-Villadangos, M, Moreno-Paz, M, Blanco, Y, Rodríguez, N, Bird, L, Lincoln, SA, Tornos, F, Prieto-Ballesteros, O, Freeman, KH, Pieper, DH, Timmis, KN, Amils, R and Parro, V (2018) Viable cyanobacteria in the deep continental subsurface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 115, 1070210707.Google Scholar
Rabbow, E, Parpart, A and Reitz, G (2016) The Planetary and space simulation facilities at DLR Cologne. Microgravity Science and Technology 28, 215229.Google Scholar
Rabbow, E, Rettberg, P, Parpart, A, Panitz, C, Schulte, W, Molter, F, Jaramillo, E, Demets, R, Weiß, P and Willnecker, R (2017) EXPOSE-R2: the astrobiological ESA mission on board of the International Space Station. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, 1533.Google Scholar
Reitz, G, Berger, T and Matthiae, D (2012) Radiation exposure in the Moon environment. Planetary and Space Science 74, 7883.Google Scholar
Rippka, R, Deruelles, J, Waterbury, JB, Herdman, M and Stanier, RY (1979) Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. Journal of General Microbiology 111, 161.Google Scholar
Rudi, K, Hagen, I, Johnsrud, BC, Skjefstad, G and Tryland, I (2010) Different length (DL) qPCR for quantification of cell killing by UV-induced DNA damage. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7, 33763381.Google Scholar
Schuerger, AC, Moores, JE, Smith, DJ and Reitz, G (2019) A lunar microbial survival model for predicting the forward contamination of the Moon. Astrobiology 19, 730756.Google Scholar
Schulze-Makuch, D and Crawford, IA (2018) Was there an early habitability window for Earth's Moon? Astrobiology 18, 985988.Google Scholar
Shirkey, B, McMaster, NJ, Smith, SC, Wright, DJ, Rodriguez, H, Jaruga, P, Birincioglu, M, Helm, RF and Potts, M (2003) Genomic DNA of Nostoc commune (Cyanobacteria) becomes covalently modified during long-term (decades) desiccation but is protected from oxidative damage and degradation. Nucleic Acids Research 31, 29953005.Google Scholar
Verseux, C, Baqué, M, Cifariello, R, Fagliarone, C, Raguse, M, Moeller, R and Billi, D (2017) Evaluation of the resistance of Chroococcidiopsis spp. to sparsely and densely ionizing irradiation. Astrobiology 17, 118125.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. EXPOSE-R2 flight hardware with Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029 distribution. Tray 1 compartment 1 with dried cells mixed with sandstone or lunar regolith simulant, and compartment 4 with dried cells not mixed with minerals; sample in the top-layer (t) and in the bottom-layer (b) carrier (a). Visual inspection of samples exposed in space and MGR; reddish spots are due to the glue used for the sample integration (b). Total UV dose received during the flight and MGR (c). Photo credits: Roscosmos, ESA. MGR: mission ground reference.

Figure 1

Table 1. Viability of dried Chroococcidiopsis mixed or not mixed with Lunar regolith simulant and sandstone and exposed to space conditions (Flight), Mission Ground Reference (MGR) and under laboratory conditions (Laboratory control). Viability was determined by measuring the increase in optical density at 730 nm (OD730nm) of liquid cultures obtained from 2 × 107 cells after 3 months of growth (B). Top: exposed in the top-layer carrier. Bottom: exposed in the bottom-layer carrier

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Evaluation of DNA integrity by PCR amplification of a 1027-bp gene target. Laboratory: dried cells stored under laboratory conditions; Flight: space conditions in LEO; MGR: mission ground reference; t: top-layer carrier; b: bottom-layer carrier; No-mineral: dried cells not mixed with minerals; Lunar: dried cells mixed with lunar regolith simulant; Sandstone: dried cells mixed with natural substratum; MW: DNA ladder (Hyperladder 1 kbp, Bioline).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Evaluation of DNA integrity by PCR amplification of a 500-bp gene target. Laboratory: dried cells stored under laboratory conditions; Flight: space conditions in LEO; MGR: mission ground reference; t: top-layer carrier; b: bottom-layer carrier; No-mineral: dried cells not mixed with minerals; Lunar: dried cells mixed with lunar regolith simulant; Sandstone: dried cells mixed with natural substratum; MW: DNA ladder (Hyperladder 100 bp, Bioline).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Evaluation of DNA integrity by genome PCR fingerprinting. Laboratory: dried cells stored under laboratory conditions; Flight: space conditions in LEO; MGR: mission ground reference; t: top-layer carrier; b: bottom-layer carrier; No-mineral: dried cells not mixed with minerals; Lunar: dried cells mixed with lunar regolith simulant; Sandstone: dried cells mixed with natural substratum; MW: DNA ladder (Hyperladder 100 bp, Bioline).