Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T13:44:22.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic diversity assessment of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) accessions using single nucleotide polymorphism markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2019

G. Afolayan*
Affiliation:
National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB), Ibadan, Nigeria West African Center for Crop Improvement, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
S. P. Deshpande*
Affiliation:
International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
S. E. Aladele
Affiliation:
National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB), Ibadan, Nigeria
A. O. Kolawole
Affiliation:
West African Center for Crop Improvement, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (LAUTECH), Ogbomoso, Nigeria
I. Angarawai
Affiliation:
International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Kano, Nigeria
D. J. Nwosu
Affiliation:
National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB), Ibadan, Nigeria
C. Michael
Affiliation:
National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB), Ibadan, Nigeria
E. T. Blay
Affiliation:
West African Center for Crop Improvement, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
E. Y. Danquah
Affiliation:
West African Center for Crop Improvement, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
*
*Corresponding authors. E-mail: ogo246@yahoo.com; s.deshpande@cgiar.org
*Corresponding authors. E-mail: ogo246@yahoo.com; s.deshpande@cgiar.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is an important resource to the national economy and it is essential to assess the genetic diversity in existing sorghum germplasm for better conservation, utilization and crop improvement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of genetic diversity within and among sorghum germplasms collected from diverse institutes in Nigeria and Mali using Single Nucleotide Polymorphic markers. Genetic diversity among the germplasm was low with an average polymorphism information content value of 0.24. Analysis of Molecular Variation revealed 6% variation among germplasm and 94% within germplasms. Dendrogram revealed three groups of clustering which indicate variations within the germplasms. Private alleles identified in the sorghum accessions from National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Ibadan, Nigeria and International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Kano, Nigeria shows their prospect for sorghum improvement and discovery of new agronomic traits. The presence of private alleles and genetic variation within the germplasms indicates that the accessions are valuable resources for future breeding programs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2019 

Introduction

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is an important cereal crop in dryland regions of the world (National Research Council, 1996) and the main staple crop that is adapted to various agro-climatic regions of the world (Smith and Frederiksen, Reference Smith and Frederiksen2000). It is cultivated under several biotic and abiotic production constraints (National Research Council, 1996; Smith and Frederiksen, Reference Smith and Frederiksen2000; Ejeta, Reference Ejeta2007; AATF, 2011). Sorghum is adapted to a wide range of climatic gradients and has high variation for flowering time, plant and inflorescence morphology (Morris et al., Reference Morris, Ramu, Deshpande, Hash, Shah, Upadhyaya and Kresovich2013; Lasky et al., Reference Lasky, Upadhyaya, Ramu, Deshpande, Hash, Bonnette and Morris2015; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Kong, Robertson, Goff, Epps, Kerr and Paterson2015). Africa is considered as the continent of domestication and a centre of diversity for cultivated sorghum (Harlan and De Wet, Reference Harlan and de Wet1971; Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Zhou, Guan, Yao, Song, Wang and Zhang2010), with two centres overlapping with the borders of Nigeria (Harlan, Reference Harlan1971, Reference Harlan1992). However, Nigeria is the largest producer of sorghum grain (Nzeka and Akhidenor, Reference Nzeka and Akhidenor2018).

In order to obtain an efficient germplasm management and utilization, accurate genetic fingerprinting and genotype selection in crop improvement, the information on genetic diversity is very important and has been successfully employed (Engles et al., Reference Engles, Rao, Brown and Jackson2002; Bucheyekei et al., Reference Bucheyekei, Gwanama, Mgonja, Chisi, Folkertsma and Mutegi2009). The extent of genetic diversity within a species is mostly used to measure the level of species adaptability because genetic diversity is advantageous for survival in an erratic environmental condition (Rao and Hodgkin, Reference Rao and Hodgkin2002; Govindaraj et al., Reference Govindaraj, Vetriventhan and Srinivasan2015). Genetic variation within a population is the foundation for selection in plant breeding and is also fundamental to plant improvement (Mohammadi and Prasanna, Reference Mohammadi and Prasanna2003). Therefore the conservation of plant genetic diversity is pivotal to human food security (Rao and Hodgkin, Reference Rao and Hodgkin2002).

Genetic diversity among crop species can be estimated by using morphological, biochemical and molecular markers (Geleta and Labuschagne, Reference Geleta and Labuschagne2005; Mehmood et al., Reference Mehmood, Bashir, Ahmad, Akram, Jabeen and Gulfraz2008). Although with morphological characters, the measurement of genetic diversity is much easier, however, these traits are highly affected by the environment (Tuinstra et al., Reference Tuinstra, Grote, Goldsbrough and Ejeta1996; Van Beuningen and Busch, Reference Van Beuningen and Busch1997; Abdi et al., Reference Abdi, Bekele, Asfaw and Teshome2002). Previous researches have reported diversity assessment in sorghum using Random Amplified Polymorphism DNA (Agrama and Tuinstra, Reference Agrama and Tuinstra2003; Kanbar et al., Reference Kanbar, Shakeri, Alhajturki, Horn, Emam, Tabatabaei and Nick2019), Restricted Fragment Length Polymorphism (Deu et al., Reference Deu, Gonzalez-de-Leon, Glaszmann, Degremont, Chantereau, Lanaud and Hamon1994; Smith et al., Reference Smith, Kresovich, Hopkins, Mitchell, Dean, Woodman, Lee and Porter2000), Simple Sequence Repeat (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Kresovich, Hopkins, Mitchell, Dean, Woodman, Lee and Porter2000; Agrama and Tuinstra, Reference Agrama and Tuinstra2003; Casa et al., Reference Casa, Mitchell, Hamblin, Sun, Bowers, Paterson, Aquadro and Kresovich2005; Deu et al., Reference Deu, Rattunde and Chantereau2006; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Dean, Erpelding and Pederson2006) and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (Murray et al., Reference Murray, Rooney, Hamblin, Mitchell and Kresovich2009; Hu et al., Reference Hu, Olatoye, Marla and Morris2019)

Despite all work done on genetic diversity studies in sorghum, the genetic diversity of Nigerian sorghum has not been well fully characterized (Olatoye et al., Reference Olatoye, Hu, Maina and Moris2018). Therefore additional research needs to be done on Nigerians sorghum genetic diversity for conservation and sustainable utilization. Thus, a highly informative, co-dominant, more effective and very potent tool like the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) marker (Varshney et al., Reference Varshney, Beier, Khlestkina, Kota, Korzun, Röder, Graner and Börner2007) would be useful. In this study, SNPs markers were used to estimate the genetic diversity and relationships among gene bank sorghum accessions and other sorghum lines obtained from institutions within and outside Nigeria, for the efficient and effective conservation and utilization of the available genetic diversity.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

A total of 214 sorghum accessions consisting of 92 accessions from International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Kano, Nigeria, seven breeding lines from Institute for Agricultural Research (IAR), Zaria, Nigeria, 11 breeding lines from ICRISAT, Bamako, Mali and 104 accessions for National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB), Ibadan, Nigeria (online Supplementary Fig. S1) were collected for this study.

Genomic DNA extraction and SNP genotyping

Seeds of all the accessions were shipped to ICRISAT-India and sown on the plant quarantine field. Genomic DNA was isolated from 2 weeks old plants using the Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA, DNeasy Plant Mini Kit and digested using the thermostable ApeKI restriction enzyme. The accessions were then genotyped using the ICRISAT-CEG (https://www.icrisat.org/ceg/) Genotyping-by-Sequence (GBS) Platform. Raw reads from the sequenced GBS library were called in the GBS analysis pipeline (Tassel version: 3.0.147), an extension to the Java program TASSEL (Bradbury et al., Reference Bradbury, Zhang, Kroon, Casstevens, Ramdoss and Buckler2007), was used to call SNPs from the sequenced library by aligning tags to the BTx623 sorghum genome [Sorghum bicolor v.1.0; (Paterson et al., Reference Paterson, Bowers, Bruggmann, Dubchak, Grimwood, Gundlach and Rokhsar2009)]; This procedure provided 317,279 SNPs covering all the 10 chromosomes of the sorghum genome. Out of these 4980 SNP loci having a minimum of 0.05 allele frequency and no missing data for 157 sorghum accessions (online Supplementary Table S1), were selected using TASSEL version 4.1.12 and used for analysing the genetic diversity of sorghum accessions in the current study. Map distribution of the SNP loci on the 10 sorghum chromosomes (ch) was 693 in ch1, 630 in ch2, 656 in ch3, 559 in ch4, 580 in ch5, 437 in ch6, 302 in ch7, 367 in ch8, 377 in ch9 and 379 in ch10.

Data analysis

To quantify genetic variation among the 157 sorghum accessions, genetic diversity estimates which include minor allele frequency (MAF), gene diversity, observed and expected heterozygosity, frequency of private alleles, percentage of polymorphic loci and polymorphic information content (PIC) which refers to the relative significance of each marker with respect to the amount of polymorphism according to Botstein et al. (Reference Botstein, White, Skolnick and Davis1980) were calculated using the Genetic Analysis in Excel (GenAIEx) version 6.4 (Peakall and Smouse, Reference Peakall and Smouse2012) and PowerMarker (Liu and Muse, Reference Liu and Muse2005) softwares. The Nei's genetic distance (Nei and Li Reference Nei and Li1987) between accessions was generated by using the PowerMarker software.

Identification and partitioning of the sorghum accessions into genetic groups was performed using two complementary clustering approaches: (i) Dendrogram was constructed based on the Neighbour-Joining (Saitou and Nei, Reference Saitou and Nei1987) algorithm according to shared-allele distance and visualized using MEGA version 5 (Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Peterson, Peterson, Stecher, Nei and Kumar2011). (ii) Structure version 2.3.3 software (Pritchard et al., Reference Pritchard, Stephens and Donnelly2000; Falush et al., Reference Falush, Stephens and Pritchard2003) was used for the Bayesian clustering of the 157 Sorghum accessions. A burn-in period of 50,000 and a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) replications set at 50,000 was used. Three runs were performed by setting the number of clusters (K) from 1 to 10. The optimal subpopulation model was investigated in several ways: (a) by applying the informal pointers (i.e. geographical origin) proposed by Pritchard et al. (Reference Pritchard, Stephens and Donnelly2000) (b) by considering ΔK, a second order rate change with respect to K, as defined in Evanno et al. (Reference Evanno, Regnaut and Goudet2005), and (c) by plotting the log probability L(K) and ΔK of the data overruns, as implemented in STRUCTURE HARVESTER (Earl, Reference Earl2012) and thus the most likely value of K determined. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) (Excoffier et al., Reference Excoffier, Smouse and Quattro1992) and the fixation index (F ST) used for population differentiation and level of significance for variance component estimates were computed using the GenAlEx software.

Results

Genetic diversity

From the 4980 informative SNPs markers, 0.08% had a MAF < 0.05, 38.88% had a MAF ⩽0.2, approximately 50% of the markers had a MAF > 0.2, and 8.78% showed almost equal allele frequencies (with MAF of 0.5) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of minor allele frequency among 157 sorghum accessions.

Accessions from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria showed the highest values for Nei's gene diversity and PIC, followed by ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria and ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali (Table 1).

Table 1. Genetic diversity generated by 4980 SNP markers from 157 sorghum accessions

Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; PIC, polymorphic information content, and % P, percentage of polymorphic loci.

We identified 174 private alleles (MAF > 0.01) only from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria and NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria sorghum germplasms. Since accessions from IAR-Zaria, Nigeria and ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali had fewer than 10 accessions, we did not estimate the proportion of private alleles. The observed heterozygosity (Ho) within accessions obtained from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria, ranged from 0.00 to 0.98 with an overall mean of 0.26. Accessions from IAR-Zaria, Nigeria had observed heterozygosity ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 and the overall mean of 0.19. Within accessions obtained from ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali, observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 1.00 with an overall mean of 0.20, accessions obtained from the NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria gene bank had observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.96 with a mean of 0.23. The expected heterozygosity (He) within accessions obtained from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria, ranged from 0.00 to 0.50 with an overall mean of 0.30. Accessions from IAR-Zaria, Nigeria had the expected heterozygosity ranging from 0.00 to 0.50 and the overall mean of 0.28. Within accessions obtained from ICRISAT-Bamako Mali, expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.50 with an overall mean of 0.30, accessions obtained from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria gene bank, had expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.50 with a mean of 0.30. The percentage of polymorphic loci obtained from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria and NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria also reflects greater genetic variation compared to accessions from ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali and IAR-Zaria, Nigeria.

Genetic differentiation within and among the four germplasms

Molecular variance component among and within the accessions was compared to serve as a complementary indicator for genetic diversity. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) shows that genetic variation within accessions accounted for 96% of the total variation, while the variation among populations from the four research institutes was 4% (Table 2). In spite of the very low variation among the populations; the fixation index (F ST) of 0.04 was highly significant (P < 0.001).

Table 2. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and Wright's fixation index (F ST) for 157 sorghum accessions based on by 4980 SNP markers

***P-value < 0.001.

Genetic distance and cluster analysis of 157 sorghum accessions

The pair-wise genetic distances between the germplasms which was calculated using PowerMarker software based on the allele frequency revealed the relatedness of accessions on a germplasm × germplasm basis. From the matrices given in Table 3, accessions from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and IAR-Zaria, Nigeria were the most distant followed by ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria and IAR-Zaria, Nigeria. While accessions from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria were the closest at 0.01.

Table 3. Genetic distance matrices between germplasms calculated according to Nei and Li (Reference Nei and Li1987) for the 157 sorghum accessions

In order to gain further insight into the genetic diversity among different collection of sorghum, a neighbour joining tree method which was based on shared-allele genetic distances was constructed. The 157 sorghum accessions were classified into three genetically distinct groups (Fig. 2). The first group composed of 7 accessions of which 2 were from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and the other 5 from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria. The second group was divided into two subgroups (2A and 2B). The subgroup 2A consisted of 17 accessions of which 5 were from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and the other 12 were from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria. Subgroup 2B consisted of the majority of all analysed accession (129) and was separated into smaller groups (2Bi and 2Bii). 2Bi composed of 59 accessions with 42 from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and 17 from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria. The subgroup 2Bii composed of 70 accessions with all lines from ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali, IAR-Zaria, Nigeria and others from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria. The third major group represented 3 accessions from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and one accession from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria. The model-based programme STRUCTURE was used to determine genetic relationship among the 157 sorghum accessions. STRUCTURE was run for K = 1–10 based on the distribution of alleles at 4980 SNP loci. The number of populations K = 2 revealed greater variability of maximum likelihood (Ln P(D)) among different tested K values than among repeated runs and was considered as the optimal number of populations (online Supplementary Fig. S2). The analysis of population structure revealed two major subpopulations (Fig. 3). Majority of the accessions were categorized as having admixed ancestry. We observed 77 accessions with evidence of admixture (41,29,6,1 accessions from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria, NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria, ICRISAT-Bamako Mali and IAR-Zaria, Nigeria, respectively). The accessions represented by red colour include 19 from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria and 41 from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria. The remaining 19 accessions from the four research institutes were represented by the green colour.

Fig. 2. Dendrogram of 157 sorghum accessions based on the Nei's genetic distance calculated from data of 4981 SNP markers, using the neighbour joining algorithm as the clustering method. Accessions in cluster 1 , Accessions in cluster two with subclusters 2A , 2Bi , and 2Bii . Accessions in Cluster 3..

Fig. 3. Population structure of 157 sorghum accessions.

Discussion

The description of genetic variability in a germplasm is vital for proper application and management of genetic materials (Thudi and Fakrudin, Reference Thudi and Fakrudin2011). The average expected heterozygosity among the 157 sorghum accessions in this study is low. Previous research reported expected heterozygosity ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 among reference set of sorghum using a small set of highly polymorphic Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers (Dje et al., Reference Dje, Forcioli, Ater, Lefèbvre and Vekemans1999, Uptmoor et al., Reference Uptmoor, Wenzel, Friedt, Donaldson, Ayisi and Ordon2003, Ngugi and Onyango, Reference Ngugi and Onyango2012, Ramu et al., Reference Ramu, Billot, Rami, Senthilvel, Upadhyaya, Ananda Reddy and Hash2013). However, the expected heterozygosity recorded in this study corroborate the reports of Ren et al. (Reference Ren, Sun, Chen, You, Wang, Peng and Peng2013) and Dao et al. (Reference Dao, Sanou, Mitchell, Gracen and Danquah2014) in which SNPs markers were employed and expected heterozygosity ranged between 0.2 and 0.3. The observed heterozygosity reported in the present study is 0.24 which is much higher than what was reported by Ramu et al. (Reference Ramu, Billot, Rami, Senthilvel, Upadhyaya, Ananda Reddy and Hash2013). In self-pollinating crops like sorghum in which the accessions have been kept over several generations by continuous regeneration via selfing, it is expected that the observed heterozygosity will be very small. However, due to the bi-allelic nature of SNP markers, the gene diversity or expected heterozygosity and also other values like the PIC cannot be more than 0.50, which is contrary to what is obtainable for multi-allelic markers such as SSRs in which the maximum can approach 1 (Ren et al., Reference Ren, Sun, Chen, You, Wang, Peng and Peng2013). According to Smith et al. (Reference Smith, Kresovich, Hopkins, Mitchell, Dean, Woodman, Lee and Porter2000), the PIC value of markers can give better or more information on variability in a germplasm by considering the number of alleles, then the relative frequencies of the individual allele. The average PIC value (0.24) obtained from this study was similar to other studies where SNPs markers were used (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Yan, Guimaraes, Taba, Hao, Gao and Xu2009; Hao et al., Reference Hao, Li, Xie, Weng, Li, Zhang and Zhang2011; Ren et al., Reference Ren, Sun, Chen, You, Wang, Peng and Peng2013; Dao et al., Reference Dao, Sanou, Mitchell, Gracen and Danquah2014). Thus comparing the four germplasms, with respect to the PIC values and also the heterozygosity values, across the germplasms, all the accessions seem to have a relatively narrow genetic base with accessions from IAR-Zaria, Nigeria showing more similarities and those from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria being more diverse. We detected private alleles in two germplasm (MAF > 0.01). The distribution of private alleles among accessions suggests these alleles could represent introgression from neighbouring research institutes. These private alleles may be useful in sorghum improvement for the discovery of new agronomic traits.

With sorghum being a self-pollinating crop, it is expected that the percentage variation within the population will be lower than among the population (Hamrick, Reference Hamrick, Schonewald-Cox, Chambers, MacBryde and Thomas1983). Our study revealed a low (6%) percentage of genetic variation among the sorghum accession while 94% genetic variation was found within the germplasms. These results negate those of Manzelli et al. (Reference Manzelli, Pileri, Lacerenza, Benedettelli and Vecchio2007) and Motlhaodi et al. (Reference Motlhaodi, Geleta, Bryngelsson, Fatih, Chite and Ortiz2014) who reported higher variation among accessions than within accessions but was similar to those of Tadesse and Feyissa (Reference Tadesse and Feyissa2013) and Tesfamichael et al. (Reference Tesfamichael, Githiri, Kasili, Skilton, Solomon and Nyende2014). This indicates that the accessions used in this study are not under any selection for crop improvement and there is probably continuous flow of genes among accessions from the four research institutes resulting in similarity among accessions. Also, when there is a high level of seed exchange and open sorghum marketing across localities, there is a high probability of seed mixture which narrows down the overall diversity and in turn a high percentage of the overall genetic variation being present within germplasms than among (Tesfamichael et al., Reference Tesfamichael, Githiri, Kasili, Skilton, Solomon and Nyende2014). Additionally, the population size of the germplasm collections from ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali (9) and IAR-Zaria, Nigeria (7), were very low compared to those from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and the ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria. The small sample sizes from those two locations may have also affected the percentage of genetic variation among the accessions (Pimm et al., Reference Pimm, Gittlaman, McCracken and Gilpin1989). It is therefore important for plant breeders to retain the ideal population size in germplasm conservation for crop improvement. As populations are not genetically the same, in order to sufficiently estimate the genetic diversity, many individuals need to be sampled (Govindaraj et al., Reference Govindaraj, Vetriventhan and Srinivasan2015).

There was high diversity within each accession, mostly within the NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria accessions with the existence of private alleles. This could be very useful to sorghum breeding program since such alleles may be linked to important traits. The ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria and NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria accessions were generally clustered together. This clustering could be because they were collected from very close regions as most of these accessions were collections obtained as a result of scientist exploration activities. Most of the accessions clustered together in cluster 2, and were further divided into subclusters 2A, 2Bi and 2Bii, indicating that there is still some degree of variability among genotypes of the major cluster. The subclusters, differentiated between accessions from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria and ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria with the majority of the accessions from ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali, being grouped together with those from ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria. Also, the farmers varieties obtained from IAR-Zaria, Nigeria were grouped in the subclusters 2Bii with most of the other released varieties obtained from NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria gene bank and also with the ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria and ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali accessions. This Indicates genetic relatedness among accessions which may be due to mixtures of seeds from released varieties with farmers' cultivars.

Furthermore, the smaller clustering of accessions within subclusters could be due to different naming systems of the same accessions in the different institutions such as ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria and NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria. Subcluster 2Bii with the Indian durra Striga resistant accession (N13) clustered with most of the NACGRAB-Ibadan, Nigeria accessions and in close proximity with one of the ICRISAT-Kano, Nigeria accession (Kamu awangda). Also, SRN39 and Framida obtained from ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali, which has also been classified as resistant to Striga were clustered together with IAR-Zaria, Nigeria accessions (SAMSORG39 and SAMSORG40). These reveal the relatedness of these accessions through common ancestry or sharing of same genetic background. Similar clustering pattern observed in this study has been reported previously by Tesfamichael et al. (Reference Tesfamichael, Githiri, Kasili, Skilton, Solomon and Nyende2014). Clustering of accessions obtained from ICRISAT-Bamako, Mali, in close proximity with accessions from IAR-Zaria, Nigeria also shows the extent of germplasm exchange and common gene pool sharing between these neighbouring countries and geographical zones. Grouping pattern in this research is, therefore, indicating that there could be seed exchange and pollen dispersal which causes similarity between nearby populations. There was a clear separation of the 157 sorghum accessions into two major groups with the appearance of similarity of the genetic information among accessions. The results from the pair-wise genetic distances and AMOVA corroborate that of the structure analysis, revealing lower variation among the accessions from the four research institutes. We detect concordance between our dendrogram and population structure results. From these results, SNP markers have proven to be very promising for monitoring genetic variability. Understanding the population structure of the Nigerian sorghum accessions is vital to establish new strategies useful for the preservation and utilization its genetic diversity.

Our results suggest that the sorghum accessions from different geographic origins or institutions could come from the same gene pool and may not be useful for continual sorghum improvements. Therefore, when planning for a new germplasm collection and conservation, it is imperative to characterize the available germplasm before commencing on a breeding program. Conclusively, our study revealed high genetic diversity within the sorghum germplasm. Hence, these sorghum accessions will be protected from genetic vulnerability to biotic and abiotic stresses in the growing environments and breeders will be guided on how to utilize and conserve the germplasm.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262119000212

Acknowledgements

This work was undertaken as part of PhD research for author G. Afolayan and part of CGIAR Research Program (CRP) on Grain Legumes and Dryland Cereals. Authors would therefore like to acknowledge the financial support provided by Dryland Cereals for research fellowship through the West Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI). Authors would also like to appreciate the Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) for scholarship and WACCI for excellent supervision. Also the National Centre for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB), ICRISAT- Nigeria, ICRISAT- Mali and the Institute for Agricultural Research (IAR), Zaria for providing the sorghum germplasm for the study.

References

Abdi, A, Bekele, E, Asfaw, Z and Teshome, A (2002) Patterns of morphological variation of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] landraces in qualitative characters in North Showa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Hereditas 137: 161172.Google Scholar
African Agricultural Technology Foundation (AATF) (2011) Feasibility Study on Striga Control in Sorghum. Nairobi: The African Agricultural Technology Foundation, 1120.Google Scholar
Agrama, HA and Tuinstra, MR (2003) Phylogenetic diversity and relationships among sorghum accessions using SSRs and RAPDs. African Journal of Biotechnology 2: 334340.Google Scholar
Botstein, D, White, RL, Skolnick, M and Davis, RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 314331.Google Scholar
Bradbury, PJ, Zhang, Z, Kroon, DE, Casstevens, TM, Ramdoss, Y and Buckler, ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 23: 26332635.Google Scholar
Bucheyekei, TL, Gwanama, C, Mgonja, M, Chisi, M, Folkertsma, R and Mutegi, R (2009) Genetic variability characterization of Tanzania sorghum landraces based on simple sequence repeats (SSRs) molecular and morphological markers. African Crop Science Journal 17: 7186.Google Scholar
Casa, AM, Mitchell, SE, Hamblin, MT, Sun, H, Bowers, JE, Paterson, AH, Aquadro, CF and Kresovich, S (2005) Diversity and selection in Sorghum: simultaneous analyses using simple sequence repeats. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 2330.Google Scholar
Dao, A, Sanou, J, Mitchell, SE, Gracen, V and Danquah, EY (2014) Genetic diversity among INERA maize inbred lines with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and their relationship with CIMMYT, IITA, and temperate lines. BMC Genetics 15: 114.Google Scholar
Deu, M, Gonzalez-de-Leon, D, Glaszmann, JC, Degremont, I, Chantereau, J, Lanaud, C and Hamon, P (1994) RFLP diversity in cultivated sorghum in relation to racial differentiation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88: 838844.Google Scholar
Deu, M, Rattunde, F and Chantereau, J (2006) A global view of genetic diversity in cultivated sorghums using a core collection. Genome 49: 168180.Google Scholar
Dje, Y, Forcioli, D, Ater, M, Lefèbvre, C and Vekemans, X (1999) Assessing population genetic structure of sorghum landraces from North-western Morocco using allozyme and microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 157163.Google Scholar
Earl, AE (2012) Structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359361.Google Scholar
Ejeta, G (2007) Breeding for resistance in sorghum: exploitation of an intricate host–parasite biology. Crop Science 47 (Supplement_3): S-216.Google Scholar
Engles, JMM, Rao, VR, Brown, AHD and Jackson, MT (2002) Managing Plant Genetic Diversity. Wallingford, UK: CABI, pp. 487.Google Scholar
Evanno, G, Regnaut, S and Goudet, J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 26112620.Google Scholar
Excoffier, L, Smouse, PE and Quattro, JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitocondrial DNA restriction sites. Genetics 131: 479491.Google Scholar
Falush, D, Stephens, M and Pritchard, JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 15671587.Google Scholar
Geleta, N and Labuschagne, MT (2005) Qualitative traits variation in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) germplasm from, eastern highlands of Ethiopia. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 30553064.Google Scholar
Govindaraj, M, Vetriventhan, M and Srinivasan, M (2015) Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: an overview of its analytical perspectives. Genetics Research International 2015: 114.Google Scholar
Harlan, JR (1971) Agricultural origins: centers and noncenters. Science 174: 468474.Google Scholar
Harlan, JR (1992) Crops and Man, 2nd edn. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 284.Google Scholar
Harlan, JR and de Wet, JMJ (1971) Toward a rational classification of cultivated sorghums. Crop Science 12: 172176.Google Scholar
Hamrick, JL (1983) The distribution of genetic variation within and among natural plant populations. In: Schonewald-Cox, CM, Chambers, SM, MacBryde, B, Thomas, WL (eds) Genetics and Conservation. California: Benjamin-Cummings, pp. 335348.Google Scholar
Hao, Z, Li, X, Xie, C, Weng, J, Li, M, Zhang, D and Zhang, S (2011) Identification of functional genetic variations underlying drought tolerance in maize using SNP markers. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 53: 641652.Google Scholar
Hu, Z, Olatoye, MO, Marla, S and Morris, GP (2019) An integrated genotyping-by-sequencing polymorphism map for over 10,000 sorghum genotypes. The Plant Genome 12: 115.Google Scholar
Kanbar, A, Shakeri, E, Alhajturki, D, Horn, T, Emam, Y, Tabatabaei, SA and Nick, P (2019) Morphological and molecular characterization of sweet, grain and forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) genotypes grown under temperate climatic conditions. Plant Biosystems-An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 110. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2019.1569568.Google Scholar
Lasky, JR, Upadhyaya, HD, Ramu, P, Deshpande, S, Hash, CT, Bonnette, J …and Morris, GP 2015 Genome-environment associations in sorghum landraces predict adaptive traits. Science Advances 1: e1400218.Google Scholar
Li, R, Zhang, H, Zhou, X, Guan, Y, Yao, F, Song, G, Wang, J and Zhang, C (2010) Genetic diversity in Chinese sorghum landraces revealed by chloroplast simple sequence repeats. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 115.Google Scholar
Liu, K and Muse, SV (2005) Powermarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21: 21282129.Google Scholar
Lu, Y, Yan, J, Guimaraes, GT, Taba, S, Hao, Z, Gao, S and Xu, Y (2009) Molecular characterization of global maize breeding germplasm based on genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 120: 93115.Google Scholar
Manzelli, M, Pileri, L, Lacerenza, N, Benedettelli, S and Vecchio, V (2007) Genetic diversity assessment in Somali sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) accessions using microsatellite markers. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 17151730.Google Scholar
Mehmood, S, Bashir, A, Ahmad, A, Akram, Z, Jabeen, N and Gulfraz, M (2008) Molecular characterization of regional Sorghum bicolor varieties from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 40: 20152021.Google Scholar
Mohammadi, SA and Prasanna, BM (2003) Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants—salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Science 43: 12351248.Google Scholar
Morris, GP, Ramu, P, Deshpande, SP, Hash, CT, Shah, T, Upadhyaya, HD and Kresovich, S (2013) Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 453458.Google Scholar
Motlhaodi, T, Geleta, M, Bryngelsson, T, Fatih, M, Chite, S and Ortiz, R (2014) Genetic diversity in ex-situ conserved sorghum accessions of Botswana as estimated by microsatellite markers. Australian Journal of Crop Science 8: 3543.Google Scholar
Murray, SC, Rooney, WL, Hamblin, MT, Mitchell, SE and Kresovich, S (2009) Sweet sorghum genetic diversity and association mapping for brix and height. The Plant Genome 2: 4862.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1996) Lost Crops of Africa: Volume I: Grains. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 408.Google Scholar
Nei, M and Li, WH (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 512.Google Scholar
Ngugi, K and Onyango, CM (2012) Analysis of the molecular diversity of Kenyan sorghum germplasm using microsatellites. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 15: 189194.Google Scholar
Nzeka, U and Akhidenor, J (2018) Nigeria: Grain and Feed Annual. GAIN Reports, USDA-FAS. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/RecentGAINPublications/GrainandFeedAnnualLagosNigeria.Google Scholar
Olatoye, MO, Hu, Z, Maina, F and Moris, GP (2018) Genomic signatures of adaptation to a precipitation gradient in Nigerian sorghum. G3: Genes Genomes Genetics 8: 32693281.Google Scholar
Paterson, AH, Bowers, JE, Bruggmann, R, Dubchak, I, Grimwood, J, Gundlach, H and Rokhsar, DS (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457: 551556.Google Scholar
Peakall, ROD and Smouse, PE (2012) GENALEX 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288295.Google Scholar
Pimm, SL, Gittlaman, JL, McCracken, GF and Gilpin, M (1989) Genetic bottlenecks: alternative explanations for low genetic variability. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 176177.Google Scholar
Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M and Donnelly, P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945959.Google Scholar
Ramu, P, Billot, C, Rami, JF, Senthilvel, S, Upadhyaya, HD, Ananda Reddy, L and Hash, CT (2013) Assessment of genetic diversity in the sorghum reference set using EST-SSR markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126: 20512064.Google Scholar
Rao, VR and Hodgkin, T (2002) Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 68: 119.Google Scholar
Ren, J, Sun, D, Chen, L, You, FM, Wang, J, Peng, Y and Peng, J (2013) Genetic diversity revealed by single nucleotide polymorphism markers in a worldwide germplasm collection of durum wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14: 70617088.Google Scholar
Saitou, N and Nei, M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406425.Google Scholar
Smith, CW and Frederiksen, RA (2000) Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, and Production, Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 824.Google Scholar
Smith, JSC, Kresovich, S, Hopkins, MS, Mitchell, SE, Dean, RE, Woodman, WL, Lee, M and Porter, K (2000) Genetic diversity among elite sorghum inbred lines assessed with simple sequence repeats. Crop Science 40: 226232.Google Scholar
Tadesse, H and Feyissa, T (2013) Analysis of genetic diversity of sorghum bicolor ssp. bicolor (L.) moench using ISSR markers. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 12: 6170.Google Scholar
Tamura, K, Peterson, D, Peterson, N, Stecher, G, Nei, M and Kumar, S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 27312739.Google Scholar
Tesfamichael, TA, Githiri, SM, Kasili, RW, Skilton, RA, Solomon, M and Nyende, AB (2014) Genetic diversity analysis of eritrean sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Germplasm using SSR markers. Molecular Plant Breeding 5: 112.Google Scholar
Thudi, M and Fakrudin, B (2011) Identification of unique alleles and assessment of genetic diversity of rabi sorghum accessions using simple sequence repeat markers. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 20: 7483.Google Scholar
Tuinstra, MR, Grote, EM, Goldsbrough, PB and Ejeta, G (1996) Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with pre-flowering drought tolerance in sorghum. Crop Science 36: 13371344.Google Scholar
Uptmoor, R, Wenzel, W, Friedt, W, Donaldson, G, Ayisi, K and Ordon, F (2003) Comparative analysis on the genetic relatedness of Sorghum bicolor accessions from Southern Africa by RAPDs, AFLPs and SSRs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 13161325.Google Scholar
Van Beuningen, LT and Busch, RH (1997) Genetic diversity among North American spring wheat cultivars: III. Cluster analysis based on quantitative morphological traits. Crop Science 37: 981988.Google Scholar
Varshney, RK, Beier, U, Khlestkina, E, Kota, R, Korzun, V, Röder, M, Graner, A and Börner, A (2007) Single nucleotide polymorphisms in rye: discovery, frequency and applications for genome mapping and diversity studies. Theory of Applied Genetics 114: 11051116.Google Scholar
Wang, ML, Dean, R, Erpelding, J and Pederson, G (2006) Molecular genetic evaluation of sorghum germplasm differing in response to fungal diseases: rust (Puccinia purpurea) and anthracnose (Collectotrichum graminicola). Euphytica 148: 319330.Google Scholar
Zhang, D, Kong, W, Robertson, J, Goff, VH, Epps, E, Kerr, A and Paterson, AH (2015) Genetic analysis of inflorescence and plant height components in sorghum (Panicoidae) and comparative genetics with rice (Oryzoidae). BMC Plant Biology 15: 107.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of minor allele frequency among 157 sorghum accessions.

Figure 1

Table 1. Genetic diversity generated by 4980 SNP markers from 157 sorghum accessions

Figure 2

Table 2. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and Wright's fixation index (FST) for 157 sorghum accessions based on by 4980 SNP markers

Figure 3

Table 3. Genetic distance matrices between germplasms calculated according to Nei and Li (1987) for the 157 sorghum accessions

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Dendrogram of 157 sorghum accessions based on the Nei's genetic distance calculated from data of 4981 SNP markers, using the neighbour joining algorithm as the clustering method. Accessions in cluster 1 , Accessions in cluster two with subclusters 2A , 2Bi , and 2Bii . Accessions in Cluster 3..

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Population structure of 157 sorghum accessions.

Supplementary material: Image

Afolayan et al. supplementary material

Afolayan et al. supplementary material 1

Download Afolayan et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 208.9 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Afolayan et al. supplementary material

Afolayan et al. supplementary material 2

Download Afolayan et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 27.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Afolayan et al. supplementary material

Afolayan et al. supplementary material 3

Download Afolayan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 21.8 KB