Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T19:59:07.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defining, Describing, and Categorizing Public Health Infrastructure Priorities for Tropical Cyclone, Flood, Storm, Tornado, and Tsunami-Related Disasters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Benjamin J. Ryan*
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia
Richard C. Franklin
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia World Safety Organization Collaborating Centre for Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia Royal Life Saving Society, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Frederick M. Burkle Jr
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Kerrianne Watt
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia World Safety Organization Collaborating Centre for Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Peter Aitken
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Erin C. Smith
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia School of Medical Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Peter Leggat
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia World Safety Organization Collaborating Centre for Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia Faculty of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Benjamin Ryan, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville QLD 4811 Australia (e-mail: benjamin.ryan@my.jcu.edu.au).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

The study aim was to undertake a qualitative research literature review to analyze available databases to define, describe, and categorize public health infrastructure (PHI) priorities for tropical cyclone, flood, storm, tornado, and tsunami-related disasters.

Methods

Five electronic publication databases were searched to define, describe, or categorize PHI and discuss tropical cyclone, flood, storm, tornado, and tsunami-related disasters and their impact on PHI. The data were analyzed through aggregation of individual articles to create an overall data description. The data were grouped into PHI themes, which were then prioritized on the basis of degree of interdependency.

Results

Sixty-seven relevant articles were identified. PHI was categorized into 13 themes with a total of 158 descriptors. The highest priority PHI identified was workforce. This was followed by water, sanitation, equipment, communication, physical structure, power, governance, prevention, supplies, service, transport, and surveillance.

Conclusions

This review identified workforce as the most important of the 13 thematic areas related to PHI and disasters. If its functionality fails, workforce has the greatest impact on the performance of health services. If addressed post-disaster, the remaining forms of PHI will then be progressively addressed. These findings are a step toward providing an evidence base to inform PHI priorities in the disaster setting. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:598–610)

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2016 

Over the last quarter of a century the frequency of natural disasters has increased.Reference Hogan and Burstein 1 Of these, 88% have been the result of tropical cyclones (cyclones, hurricanes, and typhoons), floods, storms, tornadoes, and tsunamis, resulting in 76% of recorded deaths.Reference Goklany 2 , 3 A disaster often results in the destruction and deterioration of essential public health infrastructure (PHI), such as food, health services, power, sanitation, and shelter.Reference Martine and Guzman 4 , Reference Ryan, Franklin and Burkle 5 This jeopardizes access to treatment and medication, which can further increase the indirect morbidity and mortality during and after a disaster.Reference Jhung, Shehab and Rohr-Allegrini 6

As a result of population growth, density, and rapid urbanization of vulnerable populations, the risk disasters pose to PHI continues to rise. 7 - 9 For example, the southwestern United States is a fertile breeding ground for tornadoes.Reference Baird and Goble 10 Since 1950 there have been an average of 53 tornadoes and 5 deaths annually.Reference Baird and Goble 10 , Reference Fratinardo and Schroeder 11 In Oklahoma, the urban sprawl has resulted in an increased number of people living in high-risk tornado areas. 12 This risk will only increase as the population of Oklahoma is expected to increase from 3.9 million in 2013 to over 5 million by 2050. 12

There has been scant research into the priorities for PHI of people living in disaster-vulnerable areas. Understanding PHI priorities would benefit decision-makers, disaster and health planners, health systems, and the community by systematically informing preparation, response, and recovery.

To help address this problem, a qualitative research literature review was conducted to better define, describe, and categorize PHI according to the priorities for disaster management systems. The objectives included defining PHI in the context of tropical cyclone (cyclone, hurricane, and typhoon), flood, storm, tornado, and tsunami-related disasters and categorizing PHI priorities for these disaster types.

Methods

This qualitative research was completed by using an integrative review method. This methodology was selected owing to its effectiveness in defining concepts such as the definition, description, and categorization of PHI for disasters.Reference Whittemore and Knafl 13 , Reference Broome 14 The method also allowed specific aspects of previous research to be critically and methodically evaluated.Reference Torraco 15 To systematically achieve this, the research was completed in 4 stages: problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, and data analysis.Reference Whittemore and Knafl 13 The data evaluation and analysis were guided by the principles of qualitative research.Reference Creswell 16 Each stage is discussed in the following sections.

Problem Identification

PHI is not clearly defined, described, or categorized to effectively inform preparation, response, and recovery activities for tropical cyclone, flood, storm, tornado, and tsunami-related disasters. The focus on these events is because they account for 88% of disasters and result in 76% of disaster-related deaths.Reference Goklany 2 , 3

Literature Search

The literature search was conducted over 3 phases. The first focused on testing, refining, and finalizing the search terms in Medline. The second extended the search to other databases, and the final was the selection of articles for analysis on the basis of specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Testing, Refining, and Finalizing the Search Terms

The search terms were determined through a process of testing, refining, and finalizing in Medline between September 2013 and December 2014. The Medline database was selected because it is an essential tool for biomedical, allied health researchers and practitioners conducting literature searches.Reference Gasparyan 17 , Reference Lippi, Favaloro and Simundic 18

Based on this process of testing, refining, and finalizing, the following search terms and methodology were used: “public health infrastructure,” “public health” or “infrastructure”; and “define,” “describe” and “categorize”; and “flood,” “cyclone,” “storm,” “hurricane,” “tornado,” “tsunami” or “typhoon”; and “disaster.”

Databases

The databases searched were CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO, Science Direct, Scopus, and Wiley Online. These databases were selected to maximize the literature searched and minimize the risk of missing relevant articles. An all-field search was conducted between March and May 2014 by using the search terms with a date limit of 31 December 2013. Consistent with other literature reviews, the search strategies used differed on the basis of the database functionality (see the table in the online data supplement).Reference Boehm, Franklin and King 19

Because this was a novel area of research, additional exclusions were required for some databases. The Medline search was limited to articles with abstracts and references, pharmacological actions, humans, and core clinical journals. The CINAHL, Scopus, and Science Direct searches were limited to Medicine; Nursing; Health Professions; Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmaceutics; Dentistry; and Engineering. This approach ensured the search was tailored to each database, which increased the efficiency and accuracy.

Careful consideration was given to including Google Scholar. However, there are various concerns with its use. The retrieval and record management mechanisms are relatively unsophisticated and lack quality compared to other databases.Reference Walters 20 , Reference Aguillo 21 Results with Google Scholar are displayed in relation to times of visits from users, not in relation to quality of the publications.Reference Falagas, Pitsouni, Malietzis and Pappas 22 Also, this research was focused on peer-reviewed literature; gray literature was excluded. For these reasons, Google Scholar was used only to explore reference lists and citations of relevant literature.

Selection Strategy

The selection of articles was conducted over 3 stages after retrieval from a database. This included a selection of articles based on the title, followed by an abstract review and then a full text analysis. An article was considered valid if the inclusion criteria were achieved, which included defining, describing, or categorizing PHI for humans and discussing how tropical cyclone, flood, storm, tornado, and tsunami-related disasters impacted PHI. Articles were excluded if they did not define, describe, or categorize PHI and discuss tropical cyclone, flood, storm, tornado, and tsunami-related disasters.

Data Evaluation

The evaluation was conducted by organizing the data, reading, memoing, and data description.Reference Creswell 16 The methodology for each was as follows:

  • Data organization: After being sourced, the data (articles) were saved electronically and, where appropriate, hard copies were stored on file.

  • Reading and memoing: The data were read and memoing was conducted through a combination of electronic notes and by hand by using a highlighter and pen. The information gathered was captured electronically (a table embedded in a Microsoft Word [Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA] document) and coded according to key phrases, ideas, and concepts.

  • Data description: an individual description for each article was developed. This included categorizing the articles into 6 data types: opinion, description, literature review, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. This was followed by describing each article’s key phrases, ideas, and concepts and grouping PHI identified into themes.

Data Analysis

The data were thematically analyzed and then the degree of interdependency (or interdependency index) calculated.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 The thematic analysis included a grouping of PHI themes identified and a description of the key phrases, ideas, and concepts for each theme. The degree of interdependency was then calculated to prioritize PHI on the basis of its importance for maintaining health services for the community. This interdependency process was selected because it describes the relationship between 2 themes and the influences/correlation with the other.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 In other words, 2 themes are interdependent when each is dependent on the other.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23

The degree of interdependency was evaluated by values between 0 and 1, where 0 represents the absence of interdependency and 1 represents maximum interdependency between the two themes.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 For example, a low independency was considered 0.3, medium 0.6, and high 1.0.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Pederson, Dudenhoeffer, Hartley and Permann 24 The use of the terms low, medium, and high was based on Pederson et alReference Pederson, Dudenhoeffer, Hartley and Permann 24 and the 0.3, 0.6, and 1 scores used by Solari and Cimellaro.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23

To rank the interdependency, the scores for each PHI theme were added. The total score for a row reflected the leadership index and the column score was the subordination index. The theme with the highest leadership index was considered the most important because if its functionality fails, the performances of health services for the community decrease dramatically. The theme with the highest subordination index had the greatest dependency on the other PHI within the community.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 Both index scores for each theme were then added to provide the ranking.

The interdependency ranking process was conducted by 4 assessors: 2 clinicians (one with a humanitarian focus), an environmental health/disaster health professional, and a public health practitioner/academic. The assessors were selected to ensure the process was completed by an interdisciplinary team (clinical practice, disaster management, policy, and research). The team members were chosen on the basis of independent recommendations, respected knowledge, and peer-reviewed publications. The scores by each assessor were aggregated and averaged to provide a prioritization of PHI.

Human Participation Protection

Study protocol approval was not needed because there was no direct human participation in the study.

Results

Literature Search

The search strategy identified 4932 potentially relevant articles. After we applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 90 full-text articles were analyzed. Of these, 23 were rejected because they did not define, describe, or categorize PHI and discuss cyclone, hurricane, typhoon, flood, storm, tornado, and tsunami-related disasters. The remaining 67 were identified as being relevant and data were extracted (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Literature Review Flow Chart.

Data Evaluation

A matrix was developed to provide an individual case description for each article (Table 1). The most common data type was an opinion article (n=22, 33%). This was followed by description (n=16, 24%), literature review (n=10, 15%), mixed methods (n=9, 13%), quantitative (n=7, 11%), and qualitative (n=3, 4%). Thus, 57% of the articles were opinion or description related and 28% were scientific (mixed methods; quantitative and qualitative). The remaining 15% were literature reviews.

Table 1 Individual Case Description

Of the 67 articles, 19 (28%) focused on hurricanes, 5 on floods (8%), 1 on tsunami (1.5%), and the remaining 42 (63%) on more than one disaster type: tropical cyclone, flood, storm, tornado, and tsunami (Figure 2). The most common disaster discussed was Hurricane Katrina (n=13), followed by Hurricanes Sandy (n=2), Rita (n=1), Andrew (n=1), and Floyd (n=1). One article discussed both Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The articles also discussed flooding in Paris, France, in 1910 (n=1); Brisbane, Australia, in 2011 (n=1); Orissa, India, in 2008 (n=1); and the Japanese tsunami in 2011 (n=1). The remaining articles (n=45) focused more broadly on disasters related to tropical cyclones, floods, storms, tornadoes, and tsunamis.

Figure 2 Articles by Disaster Type.

The majority of the articles (n=44, 66%) originated from the United States (Figure 3). The next most common origin was Australia (n=6, 13%) followed by the United Kingdom and other entities including the United Nations (n=3, 4%). The other origins of the articles were Brazil, Germany, France, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland (n=1).

Figure 3 Articles by Country or Organization of Origin.

Data Analysis: Thematic

There were 158 different descriptions of PHI, which were grouped into 13 themes (Table 2). These included communication, equipment, governance, physical structure, power, prevention, sanitation, services, supplies, surveillance, transport, water, and workforce.

Table 2 Public Health Infrastructure Themes and Description for Disasters

Each of the themes had varying descriptions and citations. The theme with the greatest number of descriptions was services (n=34), followed by communication (n=18) and workforce (n=15). The themes with the most citations was services (n=35), followed by physical structure (n=34). A description of the themes follows.

Communication

Communication included Internet and intranet systems, telephony (telephone and mobile communication), media, and more generally technologies used to communicate.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 25 - Reference Noji 50 Communication also referred to traffic cameras, signs, and traffic lights.Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Akhtar and Santos 52 In a disaster situation, Internet and intranet systems allow access, monitoring, and transmission of information required to prepare and respond to a disaster.Reference Lenert, Kirsh and Griswold 30 , Reference Brown, Fischetti and Graham 40 , Reference Li and Wilson 42 , 48 , Reference Ford, Dallas and Harris 53 , Reference Health and Services 54 Telephony allows people to verbally discuss and share information.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Aung and Whittaker 28 , 48 , Reference Noji 50 Media was identified as a mechanism for communicating on social networks, radio, television, and other means used to share information.Reference Kass-Hout and Alhinnawi 26

Equipment

Equipment was categorized into clinical, hygiene (hand-washing facilities and water closets), refrigeration, and water pumps.Reference Abbas and Routray 32 - Reference Pesik and Gorman 34 , 48 , Reference McHugh 55 - 63 Clinical equipment was considered items used to treat patients (for example, beds, medical devices, and disposable items).Reference Koenig 59 , Reference Runkle, Brock-Martin, Karmaus and Svendsen 62 Hygiene included practices used for infection control, and refrigeration ensured medicines and food were stored at appropriate temperatures.Reference Rebmann, Carrico and English 46 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Sullivan and McDonald 60 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Winslow 65 Water pumps were identified as having a range of uses and were required to ensure water could be transported (for example, from a rainwater tank to the tap).Reference Abbas and Routray 32 , Reference Keim 58 More generally, equipment was found to allow patients to be treated and ensure hygiene standards were maintained.Reference Putzer, Koro-Ljungberg and Duncan 56 , Reference Koenig 59 , Reference Sullivan and McDonald 60 , 63

Governance

Governance was described as agreements, command, control and coordination (leadership), planning (business continuity and policy), disaster system, finance and funding, and laws (enforcement and administration).Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Rübbelke and Vögele 35 , 36 , Reference Miranda, Fitzgerald and Osorio-De-Castro 44 - Reference Rebmann, Carrico and English 46 , 48 , Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Ford, Dallas and Harris 53 , Reference Koenig 59 , 63 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Eastman, Rinnert and Nemeth 66 - Reference Friedland and Gall 72 Agreements referred to arrangements and partnerships in place between agencies and organizations to prepare and respond to a disaster.Reference Rebmann, Carrico and English 46 , Reference Beinin 67 Command, control, and coordination was described as the systems and processes used to prevent duplication of activities and enhance efficiency of available resources (for example, military support). 36 , Reference Miranda, Fitzgerald and Osorio-De-Castro 44 , 48 , Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Eastman, Rinnert and Nemeth 66 - Reference Lee and Riley 68 Planning referred to preparations undertaken for disasters, including elements of the disaster system (for example, emergency management committee) and policy development.Reference Brown, Fischetti and Graham 40 , Reference Rebmann, Carrico and English 46 , Reference Ford, Dallas and Harris 53 , 63 , Reference Beinin 67 , Reference Olteanu, Arnberger and Grant 69 , Reference Friedland and Gall 72 Finance and funding referred to commodities and accessing funds required to ensure appropriate activities before, during, and after a disaster.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Rübbelke and Vögele 35 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 Laws were described as the legislative frameworks to protect and gather information, enforce standards, maintain hospital safety, and ensure accurate record keeping.Reference van Aalst, Strauss and Fox 31 , Reference Miranda, Fitzgerald and Osorio-De-Castro 44 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Health and Services 54 , 63 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Castleden, McKee and Murray 71

Physical Structure

Physical structure was categorized as buildings, storage facilities, health facilities, shelters, and general infrastructure.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 25 , Reference Aung and Whittaker 28 , Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Abbas and Routray 32 , Reference Fekete, Lauwe and Geier 41 , Reference Miranda, Fitzgerald and Osorio-De-Castro 44 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , 48 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Putzer, Koro-Ljungberg and Duncan 56 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Runkle, Brock-Martin, Karmaus and Svendsen 62 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Eastman, Rinnert and Nemeth 66 , Reference Olteanu, Arnberger and Grant 69 , Reference Castleden, McKee and Murray 71 - 80 Buildings included accommodation and more generally shelters used to protect people from the elements.Reference Aung and Whittaker 28 , Reference Castleden, McKee and Murray 71 , Reference Zhong, Clark and Hou 74 Storage facilities included sites used to house goods, supplies, and equipment.Reference Tekeli-Yeşil 47 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 Health facilities referred to those aspects of buildings used for delivering health services (for example, hospitals, medical facilities, and primary care offices). Reference Aung and Whittaker 28 , Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Abbas and Routray 32 , Reference Fekete, Lauwe and Geier 41 , Reference Miranda, Fitzgerald and Osorio-De-Castro 44 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , 48 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Koenig 59 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Runkle, Brock-Martin, Karmaus and Svendsen 62 , Reference Olteanu, Arnberger and Grant 69 , Reference Friedland and Gall 72 Shelter included housing and homes, which can be temporary (such as schools) or permanent structures (such as houses).Reference Becker 27 - Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Pesik and Gorman 34 , Reference Bayntun, Rockenschaub and Murray 39 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Noji 50 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Madrid, Sinclair and Bankston 77 , Reference Loewenberg 81 Shelter provided a mechanism for people to stay safe and healthy.Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Health and Services 54 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Loewenberg 81 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 It was also identified as being particularly important for vulnerable populations.Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Pesik and Gorman 34 , Reference Bayntun, Rockenschaub and Murray 39 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 Finally, the impact of a disaster on physical structures included a loss of hospital-style care and basic services for treating patients and maintaining community well-being.Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Putzer, Koro-Ljungberg and Duncan 56 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Runkle, Brock-Martin, Karmaus and Svendsen 62 , Reference Olteanu, Arnberger and Grant 69 , Reference Madrid, Sinclair and Bankston 77

Power

The descriptions of power included electricity, power lines, and energy supply (generators and power plants).Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 25 , Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Abbas and Routray 32 , Reference Rübbelke and Vögele 35 , Reference Fekete, Lauwe and Geier 41 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Noji 49 - Reference Akhtar and Santos 52 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 73 , Reference Chaffee and Oster 75 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Downey, Andress and Schultz 79 , Reference Kennedy, Richards and Chicarelli 83 - Reference Connolly 85 Electricity was identified as being used to power lights, medical devices, and water treatment plants.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Clements 33 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 73 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Downey, Andress and Schultz 79 Power lines were identified as the infrastructure used to transfer electricity, and energy supply referred to items used to generate power.Reference Fekete, Lauwe and Geier 41 , Reference Noji 50 , Reference Akhtar and Santos 52 It was identified that without power the services and equipment required to provide health care were limited.Reference Noji 49 , Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , 80 , Reference Connolly 85 This was due to the heavy reliance of medical devices on power.Reference Clements 33 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Chaffee and Oster 75 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 Communication, sanitation systems, food safety, and water supply infrastructure were also identified as dependent on power.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Abbas and Routray 32 , Reference Clements 33 , Reference Rübbelke and Vögele 35 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , 80 , Reference Debisette, Martinelli and Couig 86

Prevention

Prevention was described as health promotion, research, and public health programs. 48 , Reference Health and Services 54 , Reference Keim 58 , 63 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Olteanu, Arnberger and Grant 69 Health promotion incorporates activities focused on encouraging the community to maintain healthy lifestyles and promote strategies to avoid contracting communicable diseases.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Rebmann, Carrico and English 46 , Reference Health and Services 54 , 63 - Reference Winslow 65 Research ensured the strategies implemented were based on evidence. 48 , Reference Health and Services 54 , 63 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 Public health programs included governance and legal means to protect the health and well-being of individuals and the community.Reference Health and Services 54 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Olteanu, Arnberger and Grant 69

Sanitation

Sanitation included drainage (plumbing), hygiene (infection control), sewage (latrines), solid-waste management, general waste management (medical and nonmedical), and water treatment.Reference Clements 33 , Reference Bayntun, Rockenschaub and Murray 39 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 - Reference Tekeli-Yeşil 47 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Sullivan and McDonald 60 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , 63 - Reference Winslow 65 , Reference Beinin 67 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Castleden, McKee and Murray 71 , Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 73 , Reference Chaffee and Oster 75 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , 80 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 , Reference Milio 87 Drainage referred to mechanisms for removing water and other waste products.Reference Tekeli-Yeşil 47 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Chaffee and Oster 75 Hygiene was identified as the processes in place to prevent disease outbreaks (for example, hand washing and sanitization of equipment). 63 , Reference Winslow 65 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 Sewage was described as the systems used to separate contaminants and waste treatment.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Clements 33 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 Waste management referred to the systems used to manage refuse from households, hospitals, and the general community.Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Sullivan and McDonald 60 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 Water treatment and disinfection included treating water to ensure it was free from contaminations and microorganisms.Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Sullivan and McDonald 60 , Reference Beinin 67 , Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 73 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Loewenberg 81

Services

The descriptions for services included business, hygiene (disinfection and filtration), medical (clinics, pharmacies, and utilities), public health, military, and social.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Abbas and Routray 32 , Reference Weinstein 37 - Reference Brown, Fischetti and Graham 40 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Rebmann, Carrico and English 46 , Reference Noji 50 , Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Ford, Dallas and Harris 53 , Reference Health and Services 54 , Reference Putzer, Koro-Ljungberg and Duncan 56 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Sullivan and McDonald 60 - Reference Castleden, McKee and Murray 71 , Reference Madrid, Sinclair and Bankston 77 , 80 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 , Reference Kennedy, Richards and Chicarelli 83 , Reference Connolly 85 , Reference Debisette, Martinelli and Couig 86 , Reference Gay and Sinha 88 Business referred to the functionality of health companies including food businesses.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Farquhar and Dobson 70 Hygiene was the need to prevent infection and spread of disease.Reference Keim 58 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Eastman, Rinnert and Nemeth 66 , Reference Beinin 67 Medical was the provision of medical services and treatment (for example, hospital care, immunization programs, and outpatient services).Reference Ogden, Gibbs-Scharf, Kohn and Malilay 38 - Reference Brown, Fischetti and Graham 40 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Noji 49 - Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Winslow 65 , Reference Beinin 67 , Reference Castleden, McKee and Murray 71 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 , Reference Connolly 85 Public health was closely linked with prevention and focused on intervening or preventing disease at a community level.Reference Ford, Dallas and Harris 53 , Reference Runkle, Brock-Martin, Karmaus and Svendsen 62 The military referred to emergency health services provided by a nation’s armed forces.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 Social was identified as psychological care and services provided outside a medical facility.Reference Farquhar and Dobson 70 , Reference Gay and Sinha 88

Supplies

Descriptors for supplies were grouped into fuel (gas and oil), medical products (medicines, pharmaceuticals, and vaccinations), food, supply networks, and water sources.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Pesik and Gorman 34 , Reference Rübbelke and Vögele 35 , Reference Bayntun, Rockenschaub and Murray 39 , Reference Fekete, Lauwe and Geier 41 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Tekeli-Yeşil 47 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Ford, Dallas and Harris 53 , Reference McHugh 55 , Reference Putzer, Koro-Ljungberg and Duncan 56 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Koenig 59 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Runkle, Brock-Martin, Karmaus and Svendsen 62 , Reference Winslow 65 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 , Reference Kennedy, Richards and Chicarelli 83 , Reference Connolly 85 , Reference Bonnett, Peery and Cantrill 89 , Reference Griffies 90 Fuel was described as being used to generate power for houses, business, water treatment, sewage systems, and vehicles.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Aung and Whittaker 28 , Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Fekete, Lauwe and Geier 41 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Beinin 67 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 73 , Reference Chaffee and Oster 75 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 Medical products were used to treat existing and acute conditions, including the delivery of immunization programs.Reference Bayntun, Rockenschaub and Murray 39 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Ford, Dallas and Harris 53 , Reference McHugh 55 , Reference Griffies 90 Food related to agricultural crops and the supply of nutritious meals.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Kass-Hout and Alhinnawi 26 , Reference Clements 33 , Reference Pesik and Gorman 34 , Reference Noji 49 - Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Eastman, Rinnert and Nemeth 66 , Reference Farquhar and Dobson 70 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , 80 - Reference Kennedy, Richards and Chicarelli 83 , Reference Connolly 85 - Reference Milio 87 Nutritious food was also identified as important to ensure people can stay healthy and have the energy required to respond to a disaster.Reference Bayntun, Rockenschaub and Murray 39 , 80 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 , Reference Connolly 85 Supply networks were identified as mechanisms to distribute supplies through communication and transport.Reference Bonnett, Peery and Cantrill 89 Water sources provided drinking water and hygiene capabilities.Reference Clements 33 , Reference Keim 58

Surveillance

Surveillance included assessment, monitoring, gathering health data, and health information systems.Reference Kass-Hout and Alhinnawi 26 , Reference Aung and Whittaker 28 , Reference Weinstein 37 , Reference Ogden, Gibbs-Scharf, Kohn and Malilay 38 , Reference Brown, Fischetti and Graham 40 , Reference Irmiter, Subbarao and Shah 43 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Health and Services 54 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , 80 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 Assessment referred to epidemiology and statistical analysis of data.Reference Aung and Whittaker 28 , Reference Weinstein 37 , Reference Noji 49 Monitoring included public health assessments to gather information and inform response and recovery operations.Reference Brown, Fischetti and Graham 40 , 80 Health data were used to understand the situation, including monitoring disease trends.Reference Kass-Hout and Alhinnawi 26 , Reference Ogden, Gibbs-Scharf, Kohn and Malilay 38 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Health and Services 54 , 63 , Reference Debisette, Martinelli and Couig 86 Health information incorporated mortality, morbidity, and general information relating to health services. This infrastructure informed early detection of disease outbreaks and provided an understanding of disaster impacts and a mechanism for evaluating interventions.Reference Weinstein 37 - Reference Bayntun, Rockenschaub and Murray 39 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82

Transport

Transport was categorized as airports, bridges, logistics, mobilization, public transport (subways), roads, and transportation.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Becker 27 , Reference Aung and Whittaker 28 , Reference Rübbelke and Vögele 35 , Reference Fekete, Lauwe and Geier 41 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Noji 49 - Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Eastman, Rinnert and Nemeth 66 , Reference Beinin 67 , Reference Farquhar and Dobson 70 , Reference Castleden, McKee and Murray 71 , Reference Zhong, Clark and Hou 74 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Anderson 78 , Reference Downey, Andress and Schultz 79 Airports were used for planes and helicopters, which provided a vital means for transporting patients. Bridges were identified as a key part of transport infrastructure along with roads.Reference Becker 27 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Noji 50 , Reference Akhtar and Santos 52 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Castleden, McKee and Murray 71 , Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 73 , Reference Zhong, Clark and Hou 74 This included highways, state roads, and local roads. If damaged, transport, logistic, and mobilization options for patients, the community, and disaster management systems are affected.Reference Abbas and Routray 32 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Anderson 78 Public transport included subways, buses, trams, and footpaths.Reference Aerts, Botzen and de Moel 25 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 This infrastructure provided mass transit options for the community and was identified as vital before and after a disaster. Generally, transportation included ambulances, cars, and motorcycles.Reference Loewenberg 81

Water

Water was described as water storage, drinking water, and water supply.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Abbas and Routray 32 - Reference Pesik and Gorman 34 , Reference Fekete, Lauwe and Geier 41 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Rebmann, Carrico and English 46 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Petersen and Allison 51 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Eastman, Rinnert and Nemeth 66 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Zhong, Clark and Hou 74 - Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Downey, Andress and Schultz 79 - Reference Kennedy, Richards and Chicarelli 83 , Reference Connolly 85 , Reference Gay and Sinha 88 Water storage referred to a community, farm, or household (rainwater tank) storage.Reference Zhong, Clark and Hou 74 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 Drinking water was used for food preparation, hydration, hygiene, and medical treatment.Reference Kass-Hout and Alhinnawi 26 , Reference Clements 33 , Reference Bayntun, Rockenschaub and Murray 39 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , Reference Rebmann, Carrico and English 46 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Keim 58 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , 80 - Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 , Reference Connolly 85 Water supply referred to reticulation systems and storage.Reference Solari and Cimellaro 23 , Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29 , Reference Abbas and Routray 32 , Reference Fekete, Lauwe and Geier 41 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , 57 Without water, hydration cannot occur and the capability for effective hygiene practices would be limited.Reference Keim 58 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 Also, this prevented sanitation systems from effectively working along with medical treatments such as dialysis.Reference Rebmann, Carrico and English 46 , Reference McGeorge, Chow and Carthey 61 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 , Reference Milio 87

Workforce

Workforce was described as carers, public health professionals, medical professionals, social professionals, and staff.Reference Abbas and Routray 32 , Reference Ogden, Gibbs-Scharf, Kohn and Malilay 38 - Reference Brown, Fischetti and Graham 40 , Reference Phalkey, Dash and Mukhopadhyay 45 , 48 - Reference Noji 50 , Reference Akhtar and Santos 52 , Reference Ford, Dallas and Harris 53 , Reference McHugh 55 , Reference Putzer, Koro-Ljungberg and Duncan 56 , Reference Koenig 59 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Farquhar and Dobson 70 , Reference Chaffee and Oster 75 - Reference Madrid, Sinclair and Bankston 77 , Reference Downey, Andress and Schultz 79 , Reference Loewenberg 81 , Reference Bonnett, Peery and Cantrill 89 A carer looks after the elderly and family members who are unwell or disabled.Reference Brown, Fischetti and Graham 40 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 Public health professionals work at the population level and included environmental health professionals, epidemiologists, public health officials, and health promotion officers.Reference Weinstein 37 , Reference Ogden, Gibbs-Scharf, Kohn and Malilay 38 , Reference Noji 49 , Reference Noji 50 , Reference Ford, Dallas and Harris 53 , 63 , Reference Lee and Riley 68 , Reference Madrid, Sinclair and Bankston 77 , Reference Burkle and Greenough 82 Medical professionals were identified as providing individual ongoing acute treatment and included doctors and nurses.Reference Koenig 59 , Reference Curtis, Riva and Rosenberg 64 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Madrid, Sinclair and Bankston 77 , Reference Loewenberg 81 Social professionals provided mental health and other support activities for those in need.Reference Koenig 59 , Reference Oven, Curtis and Reaney 76 , Reference Madrid, Sinclair and Bankston 77 If the workforce is disrupted, the quality and safety of health care services for patients and the broader community was found to be negatively impacted.Reference Darsey, Carlton and Wilson 29

Data Analysis: Degree of Interdependency

The 4 assessors conducted an evaluation of each theme and averaged the scores (Table 3). Workforce was identified as the most important. It was the highest ranked on the leadership index (9.4) and had the greatest dependency on other PHI (9.7). The next 5 highest themes on the leadership index were physical structure (7.9), sanitation (7.9), water (7.9), communication (7.8), and equipment (7.4). The 5 themes after workforce with the greatest dependency on others were equipment (8.6), water (8.4), sanitation (8.1), communication (7.6), and prevention (7.5).

Table 3 Public Health Infrastructure Interdependency Matrix for Disasters

An aggregation of the leadership and subordination index scores provided a ranking for PHI (Table 4). On this basis, the following PHI priorities were identified: 1, workforce; 2, water; 3, sanitation; 4, equipment; 5, communication; 6, physical structure; 7, power; 8, governance; 9, prevention; 10, supplies; 11, service; 12, transport; and 13, surveillance.

Table 4 Ranking and Categorization of Public Health Infrastructure in a Disaster

Discussion

Workforce can be considered the most important of the 13 thematic areas related to PHI and disasters. If its functionality fails, it has the greatest impact on the performance of health services and is highly dependent on the other PHIs. If workforce issues are overcome post-disaster, the remaining 12 forms of PHI will then be progressively addressed. The next priority PHI is water, followed by sanitation, equipment, communication, physical structure, power, governance, prevention, supplies, service, transport, and surveillance. Based on this description, PHI should be defined as “the workforce, equipment, supplies, and services required to maintain the health and well-being of individuals and the community.”

The ranking of communication (number 5) reflects the rapid progress in telecommunication technology. Communication no longer needs to be a major limiting factor before, during, and after a disaster. For example, in the 1990s and before, a lack of communication was considered the paralyzing factor in 80% or more of disaster scenarios.Reference Garshnek and Burkle 91 This shift highlights the need to tailor disaster activities to reflect modern-day priorities.

An interesting finding was surveillance being ranked as number 13. Surveillance is an important aspect of the health system. However, this ranking reflects that the functionality will be regained once the other PHI themes are addressed after a disaster. It is important that all themes identified are required to maintain the health and well-being of individuals and the community.

The application of the interdependency method used by Solair and CimellaroReference Solari and Cimellaro 23 allowed the relation between the 2 forms of PHI and the influences/correlation with the other to be explored. Although the degree of interdependency measurement used is subjective (in which low is 0.3, medium 0.6, and high 1.0), it provides a framework for systematically ranking and prioritizing PHI.

The findings support the mainstreaming of health into the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. 92 PHI is linked to all disaster risk reduction priority actions. The rankings of PHI presented could be used as a guide to progressively increase resilience, particularly for at-risk populations. This could result in an expansion from the traditional disaster approaches (physical capacity and material disaster relief) to a focus more on community resilience through PHI.Reference Morton and Lurie 93

Overall, this research will help disaster management and health systems prepare, respond, and recover from the PHI aspects of disasters. Ensuring the workforce is available should be the first priority for disaster and health planners. This could include providing an emergency child minding service to facilitate the return to work of health care staff.Reference Lawlor, Franklin and Aitken 94 Once planning and preparations for workforce issues are addressed, the next focus should be maintaining water, followed by the remaining PHI themes in order of priority. Ultimately, this provides a platform to help disaster preparation, response, and recovery encompass the entire PHI spectrum.

Limitations

The research was influenced by the lead author’s studies and work in public health and disaster management in Australia at local, state, and national levels and across the Asia-Pacific region. To address this, the themes identified were checked by the second author and the results reviewed by all authors.

A potential limitation is that all disasters and events of interest may not have been in the literature available for review. This is a limitation for studies such as this that are focused on peer-reviewed literature. However, the research still provides a basis to start the discussion about PHI priorities before, during, and after a disaster.

The interdependency ranking process for the PHI themes is also a limitation. To minimize the impact of this limitation, the interdependency ranking was completed by the first 4 authors. This included 2 clinicians (one with a humanitarian focus), an environmental health/disaster health professional, and a public health practitioner/academic. The scores by each assessor were then aggregated and averaged to provide a prioritization of PHI. The results may still be relevant to other disaster health audiences; however, the next step should be a process of validation. This should include a broader cohort of disaster responders, health professionals, government officials, and community representatives ranking and prioritizing PHI.

Another potential limitation is transferability of the findings outside high-income country settings. The review and subsequent analysis was limited to articles that predominantly originated from high-income countries (United States, Australia, and United Kingdom). Caution should be taken in applying the results to low- and middle-income countries because the PHI priorities may change.

Conclusions

The workforce was identified as the most important of the 13 thematic areas related to PHI and disasters. If its functionality fails, it has the greatest impact on the performance of health services and is highly dependent on the other PHI themes. If workforce issues are overcome post-disaster, the remaining 12 forms of PHI will then be progressively addressed. The next priority PHI is water, followed by sanitation, equipment, communication, physical structure, power, governance, prevention, supplies, service, transport, and surveillance. The research also supports the mainstreaming of health into the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. PHI is linked to all disaster risk reduction priority actions. Overall, the findings presented are a step toward providing an evidence base to inform PHI priorities in the disaster setting.

Acknowledgments

Australian Health Service Innovation Fund; Cunningham Centre/Toowoomba Hospital Foundation, Australia; James Cook University, Australia; Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia.

Supplementary Material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2016.3

References

1. Hogan, D, Burstein, J. Basic Perspectives on Disaster. In: Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:1.Google Scholar
2. Goklany, I. Death and Death Rates Due to Extreme Weather Events. London: International Policy Network; 2007:47. http://goklany.org/library/deaths%20death%20rates%20from%20extreme%20events%202007.pdf. Accessed February 19, 2016.Google Scholar
3. UNISDR. Number of climate-related disasters around the world (1980-2011). http://www.preventionweb.net/files/20120613_ClimateDisaster1980-2011.pdf. Published June 13, 2012. Accessed February 24, 2014.Google Scholar
4. Martine, G, Guzman, J. Population, Poverty, and Vulnerability: Mitigating the Effects of Natural Disasters Environmental Change and Security Program. 2002;8:45-68.Google Scholar
5. Ryan, B, Franklin, R, Burkle, F, et al. Analyzing the impact of severe tropical cyclone Yasi on public health infrastructure and the management of noncommunicable diseases. Prehosp Disaster Med . 2015;30(1):28-37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Jhung, M, Shehab, N, Rohr-Allegrini, C, et al. Chronic disease and disasters: medication demands of Hurricane Katrina evacuees. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(3):207-210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Council of Australian Governments. National Strategy for Disaster Resilience–Building Our Nation’s Resilience to Disasters. https://www.coag.gov.au/node/81. Published February 13, 2011. Accessed February 19, 2016.Google Scholar
8. McMichael, A, Woodruff, R, Hales, S. Climate change and human health: present and future risks. Lancet. 2006;367(9513):859-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. US Census Bureau. World Population: 1950-2050. http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/idb/worldpopgraph.php. Revised July 9, 2015. Accessed February 19, 2016.Google Scholar
10. Baird, W, Goble, D. Oklahoma: A History. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press; 2014.Google Scholar
11. Fratinardo, V, Schroeder, S. Lessons learned: how changes in code, construction and preparedness affected tornado damage in Moore, Oklahoma, 1999 to 2013. Presented at: Structures Congress 2014; April 3-5, 2014; Boston, MA. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784413357.122. Accessed February 19, 2016.Google Scholar
12. US Census Bureau. State & County QuickFacts - Oklahoma. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/40000.html. Accessed December 12, 2014.Google Scholar
13. Whittemore, R, Knafl, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Broome, M. Integrative Literature Reviews for the Development of Concepts. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques and Applications. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 2000:231-250.Google Scholar
15. Torraco, R. Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2005;4(3):356-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Creswell, J. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Washington, DC: SAGE; 2013.Google Scholar
17. Gasparyan, A. Bibliographic databases: some critical points. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(6):799-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Lippi, G, Favaloro, E, Simundic, A. Biomedical research platforms and their influence on article submissions and journal rankings: an update. Biochem Med. 2012;22(1):7-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Boehm, J, Franklin, R, King, J. Falls in rural and remote community dwelling older adults: a review of the literature. Aust J Rural Health. 2014;22(4):146-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Walters, W. Google Scholar coverage of a multidisciplinary field. Inf Process Manage. 2007;43(4):1121-1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Aguillo, I. Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics. 2012;91(2):343-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0582-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Falagas, M, Pitsouni, E, Malietzis, G, Pappas, G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Solari, D, Cimellaro, G. A comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of infrastructure interdependencies. Presented at: 4th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN2013); June 12-14, 2013; Kos Island Greece. p 471-492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Pederson, P, Dudenhoeffer, D, Hartley, S, Permann, M. Critical Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling: A Survey of U.S. and International Research. Idaho National Laboratory; 2006:1-20. https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sti/3489532.pdf. Accessed February 19, 2016.Google Scholar
25. Aerts, J, Botzen, W, de Moel, H, et al. Economic and direct losses from Hurricane Sandy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1294(1):81-104.Google Scholar
26. Kass-Hout, T, Alhinnawi, H. Social media in public health. Br Med Bull. 2013;108(1):5-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldt028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Becker, S. The Fukushima Dai-Ichi accident: additional lessons from a radiological emergency assistance mission. Health Phys. 2013;105(5):455-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e31829c351d.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Aung, E, Whittaker, M. Preparing routine health information systems for immediate health responses to disasters. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(5):495-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czs081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Darsey, D, Carlton, F Jr, Wilson, J. The Mississippi Katrina experience: applying lessons learned to augment daily operations in disaster preparation and management. South Med J. 2013;106(1):109-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31827ca3f2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Lenert, L, Kirsh, D, Griswold, W, et al. Design and evaluation of a wireless electronic health records system for field care in mass casualty settings. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(6):842-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. van Aalst, JA, Strauss, RP, Fox, L, et al. Natural disaster and crisis: lessons learned about cleft and craniofacial care from Hurricane Katrina and the West Bank. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(6):741-749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/10-019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Abbas, H, Routray, J. A semi-quantitative risk assessment model of primary health care service interruption during flood: Case study of Aroma locality, Kassala State of Sudan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2013;6(0):118-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Clements, B. Disasters and Public Health. In: Clements BW, ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2009:149-169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Pesik, N, Gorman, S. Pharmaceuticals and medical equipment in disasters. In: Ciottone G, Anderson P, Heide E, et al, eds. Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2006:308-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-03253-7.50054-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Rübbelke, D, Vögele, S. Impacts of climate change on European critical infrastructures: the case of the power sector. Environ Sci Policy. 2011;14(1):53-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Katrina reveals fatal weaknesses in US public health. Lancet. 2005;366(9489):867. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67291-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Weinstein, H. reviewer. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(1):87-88. Review of: Noji EK, ed. The Public Health Consequences of Disasters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Ogden, C, Gibbs-Scharf, L, Kohn, M, Malilay, J. Emergency health surveillance after severe flooding in Louisiana, 1995. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2001;16(3):138-144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Bayntun, C, Rockenschaub, G, Murray, V. Developing a health system approach to disaster management: A qualitative analysis of the core literature to complement the WHO Toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management. PLoS Curr. 2012 August 22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/5028b6037259a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Brown, S, Fischetti, L, Graham, G, et al. Use of electronic health records in disaster response: the experience of Department of Veterans Affairs after Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health . 2007;97(suppl 1):S136-S141. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.104943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Fekete, A, Lauwe, P, Geier, W. Risk management goals and identification of critical infrastructures. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures. 2012;8(4):336-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2012.050108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Li, J, Wilson, L. Telehealth trends and the challenge for infrastructure. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(10):772-779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2012.0324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Irmiter, C, Subbarao, I, Shah, J, et al. Personal derived health information: a foundation to preparing the United States for disasters and public health emergencies. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(3):303-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2012.21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Miranda, E, Fitzgerald, J, Osorio-De-Castro, C. A methodological approach for the evaluation of preparedness of pharmaceutical services. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan. Am J Public Health. 2013;34(5):312-320.Google Scholar
45. Phalkey, R, Dash, S, Mukhopadhyay, A, et al. Prepared to react? Assessing the functional capacity of the primary health care system in rural Orissa, India to respond to the devastating flood of September 2008. Glob Health Action. 2012;5(1). doi: 10.3402/gha.v5i0.10964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Rebmann, T, Carrico, R, English, JF. Lessons public health professionals learned from past disasters. Public Health Nurs. 2008;25(4):344-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2008.00715.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Tekeli-Yeşil, S. Public health and natural disasters: disaster preparedness and response in health systems. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2006;14(5):317-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10389-006-0043-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. National Public Health Partnership. National Delphi Study on Public Health Functions in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: National Public Health Partnership Secretariat; 2000.Google Scholar
49. Noji, EK. Public Health Consequences of Disasters. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
50. Noji, EK. Public health issues in disasters. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(1):S29-S33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000151064.98207.9C.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51. Petersen, M, Allison, L. Public Health Emergencies. In: Ballweg R, Sullivan EM, Brown D, Vetrosky D, eds. Physician Assistant. 4th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2008:615-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-141604485-7.50037-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Akhtar, R, Santos, JR. Risk analysis of hurricane disruptions on workforce and interdependent regional sectors. Presented at: Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 2013 IEEE; April 26, 2013; Charlottesville, VA. p. 41-46. 10.1109/SIEDS.2013.6549491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. Ford, H, Dallas, C, Harris, C. Examining roles pharmacists assume in disasters: A content analytic approach. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013;7(6):563-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2013.99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54. Health, U, Services, H. The Public Health Workforce: An Agenda for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Public Health Service; 1997:61.Google Scholar
55. McHugh, M. Hospital nurse staffing and public health emergency preparedness: implications for policy. Public Health Nurs. 2010;27(5):442-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00877.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. Putzer, G, Koro-Ljungberg, M, Duncan, R. Critical challenges and impediments affecting rural physicians during a public health emergency. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(4):342-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2012.59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. The public health and the Paris floods. Lancet. 1910;175(4519):1028-1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58. Keim, M. Building human resilience: the role of public health preparedness and response as an adaptation to climate change. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5):508-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Koenig, K. Adventures in disaster medicine: a United States experience that illustrates key public health policy principles. J Acute Med. 2013;3(4):119-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacme.2013.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60. Sullivan, S, McDonald, K. Post-Hurricane Katrina infection control challenges and the public health role at a mobile field hospital. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34(5):E11-E12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2006.05.162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61. McGeorge, D, Chow, V, Carthey, J, et al. Modelling the impact of extreme weather events on healthcare infrastructure using rich picture diagrams. Presented at: 27th Annual ARCOM Conference; September 5-7, 2011; Bristol, United Kingdom. p. 973-981.Google Scholar
62. Runkle, J, Brock-Martin, A, Karmaus, W, Svendsen, E. Secondary surge capacity: A framework for understanding long-term access to primary care for medically vulnerable populations in disaster recovery. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(12):e24-e32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63. Organization W. Essential Public Health Functions: A Three-Country Study in the Western Pacific Region. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2003.Google Scholar
64. Curtis, S, Riva, M, Rosenberg, M. Health Geography and Public Health. In: A Companion to Health and Medical Geography Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:323-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444314762.ch18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. Winslow, C. The untilled fields of public health. Science. 1920;51(1306):23-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.51.1306.23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66. Eastman, A, Rinnert, KJ, Nemeth, IR, et al. Alternate site surge capacity in times of public health disaster maintains trauma center and emergency department integrity: hurricane Katrina. J Trauma. 2007;63(2):253-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3180d0a70e.Google ScholarPubMed
67. Beinin, L. The influence of a public health program upon a disaster situation. J Wilderness Med. 1991;2(4):263-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1580/0953-9859-2.4.263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68. Lee, C, Riley, J. Public health and disasters. In: Ciottone GR, Anderson PD, Heide EAD, et al, eds. Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2006:7-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-03253-7.50009-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69. Olteanu, A, Arnberger, R, Grant, R, et al. Persistence of mental health needs among children affected by Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(1):3-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X10000099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70. Farquhar, S, Dobson, N. Community and university participation in disaster-relief recovery: an example from Eastern North Carolina. J Community Pract. 2004;12(3/4):203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J125v12n03_12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71. Castleden, M, McKee, M, Murray, V, et al. Resilience thinking in health protection. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2011;33(3):369-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72. Friedland, C, Gall, M. True cost of hurricanes: case for a comprehensive understanding of multihazard building damage. Leadership Manage Eng. 2012;12(3):134-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73. Aerts, J, Botzen, W, de Moel, H, et al. Cost estimates for flood resilience and protection strategies in New York City. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1294(1):5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74. Zhong, S, Clark, M, Hou, X, et al. 2010-2011 Queensland floods: using Haddon’s Matrix to define and categorise public safety strategies. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25(4):345-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75. Chaffee, M, Oster, N. The role of hospitals in disaster. In: Ciottone GR, Anderson PD, Heide EAD, et al, eds. Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2006:34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-03253-7.50012-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
76. Oven, K, Curtis, S, Reaney, S, et al. Climate change and health and social care: defining future hazard, vulnerability and risk for infrastructure systems supporting older people’s health care in England. Appl Geogr. 2012;33(0):16-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.05.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
77. Madrid, P, Sinclair, H, Bankston, A, et al. Building integrated mental health and medical programs for vulnerable populations post-disaster: connecting children and families to a medical home. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(4):314-321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78. Anderson, A. Sheltering: A Protective Parental Response to Children Exposed to Trauma. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC; 2008.Google Scholar
79. Downey, E, Andress, K, Schultz, C. Initial management of hospital evacuations caused by hurricane Rita: A systematic investigation. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(3):257-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X13000150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80. The Sphere Project. The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. Geneva: The Sphere Project; 2011.Google Scholar
81. Loewenberg, S. Louisiana looks back on a week of disaster. Lancet. 2005;366(9489):881-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67300-X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82. Burkle, F, Greenough, P. Impact of public health emergencies on modern disaster taxonomy, planning, and response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(03):192-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181809455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83. Kennedy, G, Richards, M, Chicarelli, M, et al. Disaster mitigation: initial response. South Med J. 2013;106(1):13-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31827cb037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
84. Veldhuis, JAE. How the choice of flood damage metrics influences urban flood risk assessment. J Flood Risk Manag. 2011;4(4):281-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01112.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85. Connolly, JM. Ensuring the health of vulnerable populations in the United States: Intersections of politics and public policy [dissertation]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University; 2011.Google Scholar
86. Debisette, A, Martinelli, A, Couig, M, et al. US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps Nurses: responding in times of national need. Nurs Clin North Am. 2010;45(2):123-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2010.02.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
87. Milio, N. The poverty of public health in a dominant power. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(1):2-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.042663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
88. Gay, L, Sinha, S. Resilience of civil infrastructure systems: literature review for improved asset management. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures. 2013;9(4):330-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2013.058172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89. Bonnett, C, Peery, B, Cantrill, S, et al. Surge capacity: a proposed conceptual framework. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(3):297-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2006.08.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
90. Griffies, W. Health care infrastructure post-Katrina: disaster planning to return health care workers to their home communities. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(1):70-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ps.2010.61.1.70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
91. Garshnek, V, Burkle, F Jr. Telecommunications systems in support of disaster medicine: applications of basic information pathways. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):213-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70231-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92. UNISDR. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf. Published March 18, 2015. Accessed February 19, 2016.Google Scholar
93. Morton, M, Lurie, N. Community resilience and public health practice. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(7):1158-1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94. Lawlor, J, Franklin, R, Aitken, P, et al. Perceptions of the utility and acceptability of an emergency child minding service for health staff. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8(06):485-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2014.118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1 Literature Review Flow Chart.

Figure 1

Table 1 Individual Case Description

Figure 2

Figure 2 Articles by Disaster Type.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Articles by Country or Organization of Origin.

Figure 4

Table 2 Public Health Infrastructure Themes and Description for Disasters

Figure 5

Table 3 Public Health Infrastructure Interdependency Matrix for Disasters

Figure 6

Table 4 Ranking and Categorization of Public Health Infrastructure in a Disaster

Supplementary material: File

Ryan supplementary material

Table S1

Download Ryan supplementary material(File)
File 42.5 KB