Background
Iliac vein compression syndrome was described by May and Thurner.Reference May and Thurner 1 Several surgical management strategies have been used to alleviate symptoms and correct the resulting obstruction,Reference Palma and Esperon 2 mostly involving venovenous bypass, with autologous vein creation of a tissue sling to elevate the overriding right iliac artery.Reference Cockett and Thomas 3 More recently, endovascular techniques have been used to treat both the thrombosis and correct the anatomic abnormalities associated with the May–Thurner syndrome.Reference Berger, Jaffe and York 4 However, there are no reports of May–Thurner syndrome or reverse May–Thurner syndrome in a case of dextrocardia, with situs inversus in the literature, coming in the way of transcatheter intervention. We report two cases incidentally detected during intervention and diagnosis confirmed by CT angiogram.
Case profile
Case report (1) A 7-year-old female patient known case of congenital heart disease with situs solitus, large patent ductus arteriosus with perimembraneous ventricular septal defect (left→right shunt), pulmonary arterial hypertension, and normal left ventricular function, was taken up for device closure. The venous and arterial access was attempted simultaneously from both sides to save time. Although the Terumo guidewire passed through the left femoral vein, the catheter could not be negotiated. Hence, the hand injection of contrast was administered through the sheath in the left femoral vein that demonstrated obstruction at the origin of the left common iliac vein, with plenty of collaterals (Fig 1a).The compression of the left common iliac vein by the right common iliac artery was demonstrated by simultaneous injection of contrast in the iliac vein and aorta before bifurcation (Fig 1b). This clearly demonstrated the May–Thurner syndrome.
Case report (2) A 16-year-old male patient presented with a history of easy fatigability, choking sensation, and chest pain on walking for the past 2 months. Pulse was 84/minute, low volume, with pulsus parvus et tardus. Blood pressure was 100/80 mmHg. Cardiovascular system examination revealed heart sounds better heard on the right side, ejection systolic murmur in the pulmonary area, and mid-diastolic murmur in the apical region on the right side. The echocardiography revealed congenital heart disease with situs inversus, dextrocardia, bicuspid aortic valve, severe aortic stenosis (gradient of 200/122 mmHg), and rheumatic heart disease, severe mitral stenosis (0.8 cm2 mitral orifice area, gradient 63/34 mmHg), mild tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure - 53 mmHg), concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, and normal left ventricular function. The patient was taken for dilatation of both the valves in the same sitting. As it is customary to dilate the distal lesion, we attempted to dilate the aortic stenosis first. As the balloon was slipping while inflating, we decided to pace the right ventricle. To our surprise the pacing lead could not be passed through the right femoral sheath. Hand injection of contrast showed the whirling of the dye and partial obstruction of right common iliac vein. Hence, CT angiogram was performed after the interventions. Anyway as it was a case of dextrocardia, the interatrial septal puncture was carried out by passing the Brockenborough needle through the left femoral vein in 7 o’clock position in 30° right anterior oblique view. After successful balloon valvuloplasty, by Accura balloon, a 0.025′′ Terumo guidewire was passed into the left ventricle to cross the stenotic aortic valve into the aorta and to the descending aorta. A 4 F slip catheter (microcatheter) was passed over the wire and exchanged with a 0.035′′ Terumo wire. The Terumo wire was snared through the right femoral artery, and arteriovenous loop was created from the left femoral vein to the right femoral artery. Over the extra support wire, a 12×40 Tyshak II balloon was introduced into the left ventricle by retrograde approach from the right femoral artery and placed across the aortic valve. As the waist had not disappeared, the dilatation was performed for the third time when the balloon burst. The left ventricle pressure had reduced from 332/14 to 168/8. The gradient reduced from 228 to mean 52 mmHg on pullback tracing.
CT angiogram (Fig 2) showed compression of the right common iliac vein by the left common iliac artery (reverse of May–Thurner syndrome). Hence, we were unable to introduce the temporary pacing lead through right femoral vein.
Discussion
The prevalence of May–Thurner syndrome is unknown. With the advent of venography and non invasice CT angiogram the ante mortem detection of the syndrome can be done with more precision. In the past, many cases of the left iliofemoral venous thrombosis associated with May–Thurner syndrome were probably not recognised clinically.Reference Taheri, Williams and Powell 5 , Reference Giordano and Trout 6 Compression of the left common iliac vein against the pelvic rim by the overlying right common iliac artery was first described by Virchow.Reference Virchow 7 In 1956, after examining 430 cadavers, May and Thurner described the development of intraluminal bands, or “spurs”, within the left common iliac vein of 22% of the bodies. Considering an acquired anomaly, the stricture is felt to develop as a result of not only physical compression but also the repetitive trauma of the overlying arterial pulsation, leading to intimal hypertrophy and predisposing the patient to deep vein thrombosis.Reference May and Thurner 1 One of our patients was incidentally detected during the interventional procedure where the left common iliac vein was compressed by the right common iliac artery. It clearly demonstrated May–Thurner syndrome. In our second case reverse of the May–Thurner syndrome was demonstrated showing compression of the right common iliac vein by the left common iliac artery, due to situs inversus associated with dextrocardia. The CT angiogram confirmed the findings.
The May–Thurner syndrome does not matter to the surgeons for intracardiac repair, but it matters a lot to the interventional cardiologist, as one may have to use the opposite vein or jugular approach for the intervention. The compression of artery can be clinically detected by a feeble pulse. However, there is no clinical way to detect venous compression. Hence, it is worthwhile to perform a venogram or CT angio if there is a difficulty in negotiating the catheter in the vein.
Conclusion
May–Thurner syndrome and rarely reverse May–Thurner syndrome may hamper the catheterisation and interventions. One should suspect May–Thurner syndrome if the guidewire can be passed and not the sheath or the catheter through the femoral vein.
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowlege Dr Madhav Hegde, Consultant Radiologist for his help in performing the CT angiogram.
Financial Support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Ethical Standards
Consent has been taken from the attendant of the patients.