Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:27:51.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In mouse oocytes the mitochondrion-originated germinal body-like structures accumulate mouse Vasa homologue (MVH) protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Arkadiy A. Reunov*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Cell Differentiation, Paltchevsky st.-17, A.V. Zhirmunsky Institute of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041 Vladivostok, Russia.
Yulia A. Reunova
Affiliation:
A.V. Zhirmunsky Institute of Marine Biology FEB RAS, Laboratory of Cell Differentiation, Paltchevsky st.-17, Vladivostok 690041, Russia.
*
All correspondence to: A.A. Reunov, Laboratory of Cell Differentiation, Paltchevsky st.-17, A.V. Zhirmunsky Institute of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041 Vladivostok, Russia. Tel: +7 4232 311143. Fax: +7 4232 310900. e-mail: arkadiy_reunov@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mouse Vasa homologue (MVH) antibodies were applied to mouse Graafian oocytes to clarify if mitochondrion-originated germinal body-like structures, described previously by conventional electron microscopy, were associated with the germ plasm. It was found that both the mitochondrion-like structures with cristae and the germinal body-like structures that lacked any signs of cristae were labelled specifically by the anti-MVH antibody. Moreover, some granules were MVH-positive ultrastructural hybrids of the mitochondria and germinal body-like structures, the presence of which clearly supported the idea of a mitochondrial origin for the germinal body-like structures. This finding is the first evidence that mitochondrion-originated germinal body-like granules represent mouse germ plasm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Introduction

During the life cycle of metazoan animals the germ plasm, the cytoplasmic substance that determines the segregation of primordial germ cells (PGCs), undergoes similar events of formation and transformation. An initial step in germ plasm development is its appearance during oogenesis (Saffman & Lasko, Reference Saffman and Lasko1999; Kloc et al., Reference Kloc, Dougherty, Bilinski, Chan, Brey, King, Patrick and Etkin2002; Cox & Spradling, Reference Cox and Spradling2003; Chang et al., Reference Chang, Torres, Lewis, Mowry, Houliston and King2004; Wilk et al., Reference Wilk, Bilinski, Dougherty and Kloc2004; King et al., Reference King, Messitt and Mowry2005). Newly formed germ plasm is known as polar granules in Drosophila (Mahowald, Reference Mahowald1962), as germinal granules in Xenopus (Kloc et al., Reference Kloc, Bilinski, Chan and Etkin2000, Reference Kloc, Dougherty, Bilinski, Chan, Brey, King, Patrick and Etkin2002; Chang et al., Reference Chang, Torres, Lewis, Mowry, Houliston and King2004; Cuykendall & Houston, Reference Cuykendall and Houston2010), and as P granules in Caenorhabditis (Strome & Wood, Reference Strome and Wood1983; Wolf et al., Reference Wolf, Priess and Hirsh1983). After formation and incorporation into PGCs, the germ plasm is transferred during embryogenesis and is present throughout in the next generation of germ-line cells (Eddy, Reference Cuykendall and Houston1975; Mahowald, Reference Mahowald1977; Strome & Wood, Reference Strome and Wood1982; Williamson & Lehmann, Reference Williamson and Lehmann1996; Ikenishi, Reference Ikenishi1998).

It has been assumed that mice are an exception to this situation, as germ plasm-forming structures had not been found in oocytes and early embryos, although germ plasm had been observed in PGCs and in differentiating gametes (see for review Eddy, Reference Cuykendall and Houston1975; Eddy & Hahnel, Reference Eddy, Hahnel, McLaren and Wylie1983; Snow & Monk, Reference Snow, Monk, McLaren and Wylie1983; McLaren, Reference McLaren2003). It was accepted that germ plasm was absent in mouse early development and that PGCs arise de novo during embryogenesis due to signals from the extra-embryonic ectoderm (for review see Matova & Cooley, Reference Matova and Cooley2001; Noce et al., Reference Noce, Okamoto-Ito and Tsunekawa2001; Yoshimizu et al., Reference Yoshimizu, Obinata and Matsui2001; Extavour & Akam, Reference Extavour and Akam2003; McLaren, Reference McLaren2003; Matsui & Okamura, Reference Matsui and Okamura2005; Hayashi et al., Reference Hayashi, de Sousa Lopes and Surani2007; Ewen-Campen et al., Reference Ewen-Campen, Schwager and Extavour2010). However, the exclusiveness of mammalian germ plasm and germ line has been always doubted by some researchers and a re-examination of this dogma has been discussed as being desirable (for review see Edwards & Beard, Reference Edwards and Beard1999). Hübner et al. (Reference Hübner, Fuhrmann, Christenson, Kehler, Reinbold, De La Fuente, Wood, Strauss, Boiani and Schöler2003) have shown that mouse embryonic stem cells are capable of differentiating into gametes; their research gave support to the self-sufficiency of mouse stem cells that presumably have all the necessary equipment to exhibit the germ cell pattern. Moreover, it has been stressed that, although mammals have no maternally deposited structures for germ cell differentiation, many mRNAs and proteins characteristic for Drosophila germ plasm are conserved in mouse and other mammalian species (for review see Thomson & Lasko, Reference Thomson and Lasko2005). Furthermore, the repressive mechanisms in animals characteristic of the preformation pattern of germ-line development have been found surprisingly in animals thought to have an epigenetic pattern of germ-line differentiation (for review see Seydoux & Braun, Reference Seydoux and Braun2006). Another argument in support of conserved mechanisms of development in mice was the finding of the Balbiani body. Despite the fact that mouse oocytes were thought initially to lack a Balbiani body (McLaren, Reference McLaren2003), the presence of this structure was demonstrated by Pepling et al. (Reference Pepling, Wilhelm, O'Hara, Gephardt and Spradling2007). In some metazoan animals the Balbiani body is thought to be involved in localization of the germ line (for review see Kloc et al., Reference Kloc, Bilinski, Chan and Etkin2004), therefore its presence in mouse oocytes may indicate the presence of germ plasm and therefore increase the effort to find it.

Initial controversial data, which assumed that mouse oocytes and early embryos actually contained tiny, mitochondrially originated, germinal body-like structures that were comparable with germinal granules of metazoan animals, were obtained as a result of focused electron microscopy study (Reunov, Reference Reunov2004, Reference Reunov2006). However, molecular-based investigations were still required to clarify if these ‘mitochondrion-germinal body-like’ structures were really related to the germ plasm. As the germ plasm structures of some animal oocytes were found to be Vasa immuno-positive (for review see Williamson & Lehmann, Reference Williamson and Lehmann1996; Saffman & Lasko, Reference Saffman and Lasko1999), it seemed likely that the best way to perform this sort of experiment was an immuno-test for MVH (mouse Vasa homologue), which had been found by electron microscopy to be specific for germ plasm structures in mouse spermatogenesis (Toyooka et al., Reference Toyooka, Tsunekawa, Takahashi, Matsui, Satoh and Noce2000; Noce et al., Reference Noce, Okamoto-Ito and Tsunekawa2001; Onohara et al., Reference Onohara, Fujiwara, Yasukochi, Himeno and Yokota2010).

The purpose of this study was to use immunoelectron microscopy for mouse Graafian oocytes and the germinal body-like structures described early (Reunov, Reference Reunov2004), with the application of anti-MVH antibodies labelled with colloidal gold. This research could extend our knowledge of mouse germ-line cell localization.

Materials and methods

Western blot analysis

The testes were removed surgically, then were immediately cut on ice, pieces were fast frozen on ice with ethanol. Samples were kept at –80°C. To prepare protein extracts for electrophoresis, 0.5 g of testes in an equal volume of RIPA buffer were homogenized with the 1× cOmplete, Mini, Protease Inhibitor (Roche Applied Science, cat. no. 11836153001) in a homogenizer. The homogenate was prepared for electrophoresis by boiling the sample in Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, cat. no. 161-0737) at a ratio of 1:1. Samples (≥35 μl total volume) were separated on Bio-Rad 10% Tris–HCl Precast gels in a Bio-Rad vertical mini slab gel system.

Proteins were transferred to Bio-Rad Immun-Blot polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes and blots were incubated in Bio-Rad 1× TBE/casein blocker for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C in the same buffer that contained 1:1000 rabbit polyclonal antibody generated to a DDX4/MVH primordial germ cell marker (Abcam, cat. no. ab13840). Blots were washed three times for 5 min in Bio-Rad 1× Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween-20 (washing buffer), incubated for 2 h at room temperature at a 1:2000 dilution of goat anti-rabbit IgG–horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, cat. no. sc-2030), and then washed four times for 15 min in washing buffer. Immunoreactive bands were visualized with Promega 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) Stabilizer Substrate for HRP. Molecular mass was estimated by comparing the bands with Bio-Rad Kaleidoscope pre-stained standards (cat. no. 161–0324).

Immunoelectron microscopy

Ovaries were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and washed three times for 15 min each in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 0.05% Tween 20. Materials were then blocked in casein buffer (Bio-Rad 1% casein in Tris-buffered saline (TBS)) overnight at room temperature, followed by overnight incubation with shaking in rabbit polyclonal antibody generated to a DDX4/MVH primordial germ cell marker (Abcam, cat. no. ab13840) and diluted in casein buffer (1:200). Materials were washed a further three times for 60 min each in PBS + 0.05% Tween 20, incubated with anti-rabbit Nanogold® (Nanoprobes, cat. no. 2003) in casein buffer (1:50), and washed again three times for 60 min each in PBS + 0.05% Tween 20. The negative control omitted the primary antibodies. Materials were postfixed in the same fixative for 20 min, washed twice for 5 min each in PBS + 0.05% Tween 20, then washed three times for 10 min each in molecular grade water and enhanced with gold for 30 min (Nanoprobes, GoldEnhance™ EM, cat. no. 2131). The enhancement reaction was terminated by washing three times in molecular grade water for 10 min, and materials were postfixed in the same fixative. Fixed ovaries were rinsed in cacodylate buffer and distilled water, dehydrated in an ethanol series and acetone, and then infiltrated and embedded in Spurr's resin. Ultra-thin sections were stained with 2% alcohol uranyl acetate and aqueous lead citrate before examination using a transmission electron microscope (Zeiss Libra 120).

Quantification of MVH-positive granules

For transmission electron microscopy three ovary pieces were taken from each of three individuals and these pieces were embedded in resin blocks. From each of these nine blocks, three sections were taken from different levels, thus 27 sections were investigated. The presence and ultrastructure of MVH-positive granules were investigated. Percentages were calculated and results were analyzed statistically using Student's t-test.

Results

Antibody control by western blotting and immunoelectron microscopy

Binding of rabbit polyclonal antibody to MVH was visualized by western blot for the ovaries and testes of mice (Fig. 1A,B). The assay did not show any signal for the ovary, although the signal on the blots was quite pronounced for the testes. The band on the blot had an equivalent weight of 83.426 kDa, by comparison with the molecular weight standard. The ultrastructure section stained with both primary and secondary antibodies showed labelling of the cytoplasm and some cell structures. However, the negative control that omitted the primary antibodies showed total absence of any staining (data not shown).

Figure 1 Western blots using anti-MVH antibodies in material extracted from the ovary (A) and testis (B) of mouse. No band is present in the ovary, but the testis has a band of 83.426 kDa in weight.

An investigation of mitochondrially originated germinal body-like structures by immunoelectron microscopy

We investigated the localization of anti-MVH antibody in the periphery of mouse Graafian oocytes that, based on a previous study, contained about 15% cortical granules and about 85% mitochondria derivatives that transform into electron-dense bodies (Reunov, Reference Reunov2004). It was found that the anti-MVH antibody was located randomly in the cytoplasm. Staining of the cortical granules followed a typical pattern in that some anti-MVH antibodies were visualized along their surface, but there was no internal labelling (Fig. 2A). As seen in the same micrograph, the mitochondria that were located in close proximity to the cortical granules were recognizable by the presence of cristae and were labelled by anti-MVH antibody both internally and externally (Fig. 2A). Our attention was focused on reinvestigation of the groups of granules that represented continuous stages of mitochondrial condensation that occurred during the formation of germinal body-like structures (Reunov, Reference Reunov2004; Fig. 1C). To be consistent with our previous study, we examined the localization of anti-MVH antibodies in the same granule groups and found that the typical mitochondrion-like granules that had discernable mitochondrial cristae were MVH positive (Fig. 2B). The same result was characteristic of the granules or germinal body-like structures that lacked any cristae (Fig. 3B). In addition, some novel types of granules were discovered. These were ‘hybrid’ structures that shared ultrastructural characteristics of both the mitochondria with cristae and the granules that lacked cristae (Fig. 2C). Our calculation showed that 39% of MVH-positive structures were mitochondrion-like granules, whereas 16% and 45% were hybrid granules and germinal body-like granules, respectively (Fig. 3).

Figure 2 Mouse oocyte periphery visualized by immunoelectron microscopy. (A) The anti-MVH antibodies are seen in the cytoplasm adjacent to the cortical granule, but not inside this structure. Note the localization of anti-MVH antibodies in the mitochondrion. (B) Both the mitochondrion-like granule that still contains cristae and germinal body-like structures that lacked any cristae show marked affinity to anti-MVH antibodies. Note that the scarce gold particles are distributed randomly in the cytoplasm around these structures. (C) An MVH-positive hybrid structure that has characteristics of both a mitochondrion-like granule that still has cristae (right part shown by black arrows) and a germinal body-like structure that lack cristae (left part shown by white arrows). Some gold particles are seen in the surrounding cytoplasm. c, cytoplasm; cg, cortical granule; gb, germinal body-like structure; m, mitochondrion; mg, mitochondrion-like granule. Scale bar = 0.5 μm.

Figure 3 Frequency of MVH-positive granules in mouse oocytes. Mitochondrion-like granules (1); hybrid granules (2); and germinal body-like granules (3).

Discussion

Using western blot assays we did not detect any MVH signal in mouse ovaries, although the signal was quite strong in the testes. An absence of signal could be explained by the presence of only small numbers of oocytes in the ovaries of adult animals, as was suggested by Castrillon et al. (Reference Castrillon, Quade, Wang, Quigley and Crum2000) who registered the same result during a Vasa localization study in female and male human gonads. Toyooka et al. (Reference Toyooka, Tsunekawa, Takahashi, Matsui, Satoh and Noce2000) demonstrated by confocal scanning microscopy that MVH is distributed uniformly in mouse oocytes, followed by a decrease in the anti-MVH signal and then total disappearance of signal in mature oocytes and absence at any sites of localization. Using immunoelectron microscopy, which clearly provided much higher magnification, we also observed the random cytoplasmic distribution of anti-MVH antibodies. Although the examination of dynamic changes in the presence of MVH was not the object of our work, we nevertheless believe that the anti-MVH signal normally occurs in the late stage oocyte cytoplasm, although the number of gold particles present at this stage might be not very high. Our analysis showed that, in late stage mouse oocytes, the cortical granules that were present in the oocyte periphery were negative for MVH because a signal was never found internally for the cortical granules. However the germinal body-like structures, originating from mitochondria and present in the oocyte periphery together with the cortical granules, were clearly stained with anti-MVH antibodies. This finding proves the germ plasm nature of these structures as was suggested previously by Reunov (Reference Reunov2004). Hence, it is more likely that mice have universal mechanisms of germ-line cell differentiation rather than experience any unique mechanisms that are suggested in a number of reports (for review see Matova & Cooley, Reference Matova and Cooley2001; Noce et al., Reference Noce, Okamoto-Ito and Tsunekawa2001; Yoshimizu et al., Reference Yoshimizu, Obinata and Matsui2001; Extavour & Akam, Reference Extavour and Akam2003; McLaren, Reference McLaren2003; Matsui & Okamura, Reference Matsui and Okamura2005; Hayashi et al., Reference Hayashi, de Sousa Lopes and Surani2007; Ewen-Campen et al., Reference Ewen-Campen, Schwager and Extavour2010).

The results obtained here clearly support the hypothesis for a mitochondrion origin of mouse germ plasm (see Reunov, Reference Reunov2004). It seems likely that any internal anti-MVH antibody penetration is possible because mitochondria lose their membranes, as was shown by Reunov (Reference Reunov2004). The possibility of mitochondrial membrane disappearance was seconded by Ninomiya & Ichinose (Reference Ninomiya and Ichinose2007), who suggested that this phenomenon may explain why DIG-labelled probes applied in their study labelled mtrRNA so easily. It should be emphasized that some MVH-positive granules were at an intermediate stage and shared structural signs both of mitochondria and germinal granules; the discovery of these combined structures also strengthens the idea of mitochondrial transformation. It should be stressed that the levels of hybrid structures were comparatively low compared with mitochondrion-like granules and germinal body-like granules. Presumably, this finding may indicate that the life of the intermediate granules is short or, alternatively, the transformation of mitochondria to germinal granules occurs relatively quickly.

The hypothesis of mitochondrion involvement in germ plasm formation has been voiced in previous studies of Drosophila and Xenopus. It has been found that the germinal granules in Xenopus and polar granules in Drosophila are unusual due to the presence of mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs (Kobayashi et al., Reference Kobayashi, Amikura and Okada1993, Reference Kobayashi, Amikura and Okada1994, Reference Kobayashi, Amikura and Mukai1998; Iida & Kobayashi, Reference Iida and Kobayashi1998; Ogawa et al., Reference Ogawa, Amikura, Akasaka, Kinoshita, Kobayashi and Shimada1999; Kloc et al., Reference Kloc, Bilinski, Chan and Etkin2000). Some evidence has shown that in Drosophila embryos the mitochondrion-type ribosomes, which included both mitochondrial rRNAs and some mitochondrial ribosomal proteins, are able to integrate into polysomes on the germ-plasm polar granules and presumably provide germ-line directed translation (Amikura et al., Reference Amikura, Kashikawa, Nakamura and Kobayashi2001, Reference Amikura, Sato and Kobayashi2005). As was found by immunoelectron microscopy, both the germinal granules and the matrices of the mitochondria in Xenopus embryo germ-line cells accumulate anti-Vasa antibodies (Watanabe et al., Reference Watanabe, Itoh, Abe, Akizawa, Ikenishi and Furusawa1992). It seems likely that, in Xenopus, the germinal granules and the mitochondria may share the same antigen as a result of structural continuity. It seems quite possible that, in different taxa, mitochondria could be a universal platform for germ plasm as it was suggested by Reunov (Reference Reunov2004); further research in more animal species is necessary to determine if this hypothesis is true.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by FEB RAS support (grant N 12-I-П6–08) and by Russian Government support (grant N 11. G 34.31.0010) for A.A. Reunov. Some parts of study were carried out at the Immunobiology Laboratory of The Methodist Hospital Research Institute (Houston, TX, USA). We are deeply grateful to Dr Malgorzata Kloc for invaluable help during this work and for critical reading of this manuscript.

References

Amikura, R., Kashikawa, M., Nakamura, A. & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Presence of mitochondria-type ribosomes outside mitochondria in germ plasm of Drosophila embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9133–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amikura, R., Sato, K. & Kobayashi, S. (2005). Role of mitochondrial ribosome-dependent translation in germline formation in Drosophila embryos. Mech. Dev. 122, 1087–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castrillon, D.H., Quade, B.J., Wang, T.Y., Quigley, C. & Crum, C.P. (2000). The human VASA gene is specifically expressed in the germ cell lineage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9585–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, P., Torres, J., Lewis, R.A., Mowry, K.L., Houliston, E. & King, M.L. (2004). Localization of RNAs to the mitochondrial cloud in Xenopus oocytes through entrapment and association with endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 4669–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R.T. & Spradling, A.C. (2003). A Balbiani body and the fusome mediate mitochondrial inheritance during Drosophila oogenesis. Development 130, 1579–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuykendall, T.N. & Houston, D.W. (2010). Identification of germ plasm-associated transcripts by microarray analysis of Xenopus vegetal cortex RNA. Dev. Dyn. 239, 1838–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eddy, E.M. (1975). Germ plasm and the differentiation of the germ cell line. Int. Rev. Cytol. 43, 229–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eddy, E.M. & Hahnel, A.C. (1983). Establishment of the germ cell line in mammals. In Current Problems in Germ Cell Differentiation (eds McLaren, A. & Wylie, C.). Brit. Soc. Dev. Biol. Symp. 7, 4169.Google Scholar
Edwards, R.G. & Beard, H.K. (1999). Hypothesis: sex determination and germline formation are committed at the pronucleate stage in mammalian embryos. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 5, 595606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewen-Campen, B., Schwager, E.E. & Extavour, C.G.M. (2010).The molecular machinery of germ line specification. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77, 318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Extavour, C.G. & Akam, M. 2003. Mechanisms of germ cell specification across the metazoans: epigenesist and preformation. Development 130, 5869–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, K., de Sousa Lopes, S.M. & Surani, M.A. (2007). Germ cell specification in mice. Science 316, 394–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hübner, K., Fuhrmann, G., Christenson, L.K., Kehler, J., Reinbold, R., De La Fuente, R., Wood, J., Strauss, J.F., Boiani, M. & Schöler, H.R. (2003). Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells. Science 300, 1251–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iida, T. & Kobayashi, S. (1998). Essential role of mitochondrially encoded large rRNA for germ-line formation in Drosophila embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 11274–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikenishi, K. (1998). Germ plasm in Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila and Xenopus. Dev. Growth Differ. 40, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, M.L., Messitt, T. & Mowry, K. (2005). Putting RNAs in the right place at the right time: RNA localization in the frog oocyte. Biol. Cell 97, 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloc, M., Bilinski, S., Chan, A.P. & Etkin, L.D. (2000). Mitochondrial ribosomal RNA in the germinal granules in Xenopus embryos revisited. Differentiation 67, 80–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloc, M., Dougherty, M.T., Bilinski, S., Chan, A.P., Brey, E., King, M.L., Patrick, C.W. Jr & Etkin, L.D. (2002). Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of RNA distribution within germinal granules of Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 241, 7993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kloc, M., Bilinski, S. & Etkin, L.D. (2004). The Balbiani body and germ cell determinants: 150 years later. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 59, 136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, S., Amikura, R. & Okada, M. (1993). Presence of mitochondrial large ribosomal RNA outside mitochondria in germ plasm of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 260, 1521–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, S., Amikura, R. & Okada, M. (1994). Localization of mitochondrial large rRNA in germinal granules and the consequent segregation of germ line. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 38, 193–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, S., Amikura, R. & Mukai, M. (1998). Localization of mitochondrial large ribosomal RNA in germ plasm of Xenopus embryos. Curr. Biol. 8, 1117–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahowald, A.P. (1962). Fine structure of pole cells and polar granules in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Zool. 151, 201–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahowald, A.P. (1977). The germ plasm of Drosophila: an experimental system for the analysis of determination. Am. Zool. 17, 551–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matova, N. & Cooley, L. (2001). Comparative aspects of animal oogenesis. Dev. Biol. 231, 291320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsui, Y. & Okamura, D. (2005). Mechanisms of germ-cell specification in mouse embryos, BioEssays 27, 136–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, A. (2003). Primordial germ cells in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 262, 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ninomiya, Y. & Ichinose, S. (2007). Subcellular distribution of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA in the mouse oocyte and zygote. PLoS One 2, e1241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noce, T., Okamoto-Ito, S. & Tsunekawa, N. (2001). Vasa homolog genes in mammalian germ cell development. Cell Struct. Funct. 26, 131–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogawa, M., Amikura, R., Akasaka, K., Kinoshita, T., Kobayashi, S. & Shimada, H. (1999). Asymmetrical distribution of mitochondrial rRNA into small micromeres of sea urchin embryos. Zool. Sci. (Tokyo) 16, 445–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onohara, Y., Fujiwara, T., Yasukochi, T., Himeno, M. & Yokota, S. (2010). Localization of mouse vasa homolog protein in chromatoid body and related nuage structures of mammalian spermatogenic cells during spermatogenesis. Histochem. Cell Biol. 33, 627–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepling, M.E., Wilhelm, J.E., O'Hara, A.L., Gephardt, G.W. & Spradling, A.C. (2007). Mouse oocytes within germ cell cysts and primordial follicles contain a Balbiani body. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 187–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reunov, A.A. (2004). Is there a germ plasm in mouse oocytes? Zygote 12, 329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reunov, A.A. (2006). Structures related to the germ plasm in mouse. Zygote 14, 231–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, E.E. & Lasko, P. (1999). Germline development in vertebrates and invertebrates. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 55, 1141–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seydoux, G. & Braun, R.E. (2006). Pathway to totipotency: lessons from germ cells. Cell 127, 891904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, M.H.L. & Monk, M. (1983). Emergence and migration of mouse primordial germ cells. In Current Problems in Germ Cell Differentiation (eds McLaren, A. & Wylie, C.C.), pp. 115–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strome, S. & Wood, W.B. (1982). Immunofluorescence visualization of germ-line specific granules cytoplasmic granules in embryos, larvae and adults of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 1558–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strome, S. & Wood, W.B. (1983). Generation of asymmetry and segregation of germ-line granules in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 35, 1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, T. & Lasko, P. (2005). Tudor and its domains: germ cell formation from a Tudor perspective. Cell Res. 15, 281–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toyooka, Y., Tsunekawa, N., Takahashi, Y., Matsui, Y., Satoh, M. & Noce, T. (2000). Expression and intracellular localization of mouse Vasa-homologue protein during germ cell development. Mech. Dev. 93, 139–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanabe, M., Itoh, K., Abe, K., Akizawa, T., Ikenishi, K. & Furusawa, M. (1992). Immuno- Localization of DEAD family proteins in germ line cells of Xenopus embryos. Dev. Growth Differ. 34, 223–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilk, K., Bilinski, S., Dougherty, M.T. & Kloc, M. (2004). Delivery of germinal granules and localized RNAs via the messenger transport organizer pathway to the vegetal cortex of Xenopus oocytes occurs through directional expansion of the mitochondrial cloud. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 49, 1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, A. & Lehmann, R. (1996). Germ cell development in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 365–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, P.M., Priess, J. & Hirsh, D. (1983). Segregation of germline granules in early embryos of Caenorhabditis elegans. An electron microscopic analysis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 73, 297306.Google ScholarPubMed
Yoshimizu, T., Obinata, M. & Matsui, Y. (2001). Stage-specific tissue and cell interactions play key roles in mouse germ cell specification. Development 128, 481–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1 Western blots using anti-MVH antibodies in material extracted from the ovary (A) and testis (B) of mouse. No band is present in the ovary, but the testis has a band of 83.426 kDa in weight.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Mouse oocyte periphery visualized by immunoelectron microscopy. (A) The anti-MVH antibodies are seen in the cytoplasm adjacent to the cortical granule, but not inside this structure. Note the localization of anti-MVH antibodies in the mitochondrion. (B) Both the mitochondrion-like granule that still contains cristae and germinal body-like structures that lacked any cristae show marked affinity to anti-MVH antibodies. Note that the scarce gold particles are distributed randomly in the cytoplasm around these structures. (C) An MVH-positive hybrid structure that has characteristics of both a mitochondrion-like granule that still has cristae (right part shown by black arrows) and a germinal body-like structure that lack cristae (left part shown by white arrows). Some gold particles are seen in the surrounding cytoplasm. c, cytoplasm; cg, cortical granule; gb, germinal body-like structure; m, mitochondrion; mg, mitochondrion-like granule. Scale bar = 0.5 μm.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Frequency of MVH-positive granules in mouse oocytes. Mitochondrion-like granules (1); hybrid granules (2); and germinal body-like granules (3).