Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:33:29.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does feeding on pollen grains affect the performance of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) during subsequent generations?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2019

Alireza Nemati*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran Biotechnology Research Institute, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
Elham Riahi
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Alireza Nemati, Email: Alireza.nemat@ymail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diet is a critical component of the mass-rearing of biological control agents, but the impacts of diet are not always immediately obvious and can take several generations to manifest, resulting in poor survival, reproduction, and ability to kill prey under natural conditions. Our present study aimed to investigate the performance of a commercially-reared phytoseiid mite, Amblyseius swirskii, after four (G4) and six (G6) consecutive generations on pollen grains of two plant species, as well as its ability to find and kill its natural prey, Tetranychus urticae, after long-term rearing on each diet. We found no significant difference between the two diets in intrinsic and finite rates in G4. However, both diet and generation exerted a significant influence on the fecundity of A. swirskii. By G6, females reared on almond pollen had greater net reproductive and intrinsic rate compared to those reared on maize pollen. Conversely, A. swirskii fed on maize pollen consumed fewer prey than those reared on other diets, especially at higher prey densities. The findings have important implications for developing the mass-rearing program of A. swirskii on non-prey diets. Further research must explore the suitability of almond pollen in the large-scale culture of A. swirskii.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Introduction

The mass-rearing of predatory biological control agents on their natural prey presents several logistical problems related to the maintenance of three trophic levels: the predator, their prey, and the prey's host plant. Each of these components requires considerable resources, hence significant savings can be found if the prey and plants are not required. One such system is that of phytoseiid mites, which are effective, commercially-reared predators of various insects and mites.

Phytoseiid mites are almost all predatory, yet not all species require prey to complete their life cycle. One such species is Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae). As a type III predator (McMurtry et al., Reference McMurtry, Moraes and Sourassou2013), it is a generalist feeding on whiteflies, thrips, mites, and pollen. The species completes development and reproduction on natural prey (El-Laithy and Fowly, Reference El-Laithy and Fouly1992), but also other foods such as pollen (Riahi et al., Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2016, Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017a; Khanamani et al., Reference Khanamani, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017), factitious prey (Riahi et al., Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017b), and artificial diets (Riahi et al., Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017c, Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2018). Non-natural prey (pollen and artificial diets) are also advantageous over natural prey because they are not prone to respiratory problems created when the stored-product mites Carpoglyphus lactis L. and Thyreophagus entomophagus (Laboulbene) are used for mass production of A. swirskii (Bolckmans and van Houten, Reference Bolckmans and van Houten2006; Fidgett and Stinson, Reference Fidgett and Stinson2008). Thus, A. swirskii has become an important commercially-reared predator due to its ability to be reared on cost-effective diets.

Life table parameters, such as developmental rates, survival, and fecundity, are widely used to evaluate the impact of various factors on the success of predatory mites, including diet. The impact of diet on life table parameters is not necessarily obvious within one generation and may manifest over several generations, thus affecting the long-term quality of mass-reared biocontrol agents (Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, Vangansbeke and De Clercq2014). In addition to life table parameters, it is also important to assess the foraging behavior of a commercially-reared biocontrol agent, prior to their release (Fathipour and Maleknia, Reference Fathipour, Maleknia and Omkar2016). In this regard, functional and numerical responses are commonly measured traits. Although different kinds of functional response curves are recorded for phytoseiid mites, most are classified as type II (e.g., Shipp and Whitfield, Reference Shipp and Whitfield1991; Fan and Petit, Reference Fan and Petit1994; Fathipour et al., Reference Fathipour, Karimi, Farazmand and Talebi2017).

Riahi et al. (Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017b) found that A. swirskii individuals survived and reproduced on almond and maize pollen better than on factitious prey or even natural prey (Tetranychus urticae Koch). Therefore, they concluded that almond or maize pollen were the best diets for the mass-rearing A. swirskii. However, prior to applying this commercially, three aspects must be explored. Firstly, the pollen-only diet must produce continuous generations of high quality (Cohen, Reference Cohen2004). Secondly, the predator should be able to effectively detect, capture, and kill its prey after long-term rearing (Grenier and De Clercq, Reference Grenier, De Clercq and van Lenteren2003). Finally, any potential nutrient imbalances must be explored, which potentially express themselves as a decline in life table parameters over multiple generations (De Clercq et al., Reference De Clercq, Arijs, van Meir, van Stappen, Sorgeloos, Dewettinck, Rey, Grenier and Febvay2005). Therefore, we investigate the multigenerational impact of both almond and maize pollen diets on A. swirskii reared for four and six consecutive generations, testing for possible declines in developmental, reproductive, and prey-capture performance.

Material and methods

Mite cultures

To raise the spider mite T. urticae, the natural prey of A. swirskii, bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. Khomein) were planted in pots and were kept at 25 ± 5°C, 65 ± 10% RH, under natural light in a greenhouse. The initial population of spider mites was collected from an infested cucumber greenhouse in the Esfahan region (Esfahan, Iran), which had never been exposed to pesticides and/or acaricides.

The predatory mite A. swirskii was first acquired from Koppert Biological System (Swirski-Mite Plus®) in 2015 and then was cultured in a growth chamber set at 25 ± 1°C and 65 ± 10% RH, as well as a photoperiod of 16L:8D. To culture the mites, a foam pad was placed in a plastic rectangular dish filled with water. A green plastic sheet was put on the pad and its edges were covered with tissue paper strips. Some sewing threads were located on the plastic sheet serving as both oviposition substrate and shelter. Every 2 days, bean leaves severely infested with spider mites were added on the sheet. The study was conducted in 2018–2019 in the laboratory of the Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Iran.

Pollen collection

Corn (Zea mays L. var. Single-cross 301) seeds were acquired from the Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari, Iran, and were cultivated in an experimental field located in the campus of Shahrekord University. A uniform area was selected, with well-drained soils (clay loam), and fertilized with 50-60-30 N-P2O5-K2O kg ha−1 before cultivation. Two to three weeks after sowing, urea (200 kg ha−1) was applied as a top-dressing fertilizer, and the soil was hilled up. After collecting their anthers, the pollen was gathered by drying and shaking them at room temperature. Almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb) pollen was separated by brushing the blooms collected from a garden at Saman city. Pollen was kept in a refrigerator during the experimental periods.

Multi-generation rearing

Twelve hours before initiating the long-term mass-rearing of A. swirskii on two species of pollen grains, several new threads were put in the original culture of the predator. Then, the threads were transmitted to the new experimental units which were similar to the stock colonies while with a smaller size. Next, the relevant pollen grains were added to each unit ad libitum after the eggs hatched, which continued in each of the 10 replicates for each pollen type for up to six generations. Additionally, the eggs from females of the third and fifth generations were collected for the experiments to evaluate the performance of A. swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations. Furthermore, the units were refreshed every 4 days to provide fresh pollen while avoiding contamination with fungi.

Life table experiments

The population growth parameters of A. swirskii were determined after three and five generations of rearing on almond and maize pollen. The experiments were performed at 25 ± 1°C and 65 ± 10% RH and a photoperiod of 16L:8D h. Eggs deposited from the females of the third and fifth generations were transferred individually to the experimental units. The predators were offered the respective pollen after the emergence of larvae. The experimental units were monitored twice per day and the development time of life stages and their survival were noted. After the emergence of adults, each female was coupled with a male and transferred to a new experimental unit and supplied with the same diet on which they were reared formerly. To obtain data on adult longevity, fecundity, and survival, observations were performed daily until the end of experiments.

The data were analyzed using the age-stage two-sex life table method (Chi and Liu, Reference Chi and Liu1985; Chi, Reference Chi1988). All parameters including age-stage-specific survival rate (s xj), age-stage-specific fecundity (f xj) of females, age-specific survival rate (l x), age-specific fecundity (m x), as well as population growth parameters [intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate of increase (λ), net reproductive rate (R 0), gross reproductive rate (GRR), and mean generation time (T)] were estimated using TWOSEX-MS Chart (Chi, Reference Chi2016). The standard errors of all parameters were calculated using the bootstrap technique with 40,000 bootstraps (Riahi et al., Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2016, Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017a; Khanamani et al., Reference Khanamani, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017). Further, a two-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the effects of the diet and generation on all parameters. All the mean comparisons were implemented by the paired bootstrap test based on the confidence interval.

Functional response experiments

The functional response was designed to investigate the invasion ability of the mass-reared predators on pollen diets (maize pollen: strain M and almond pollen: strain A) against the natural prey (T. urticae). The results were compared with the data of those who were reared on T. urticae (strain T). The experimental units for functional response studies were a plastic petri dish (with a diameter of 8 cm and a height of 1.5 cm) containing a circular bean leaf (with a diameter of 3 cm). Then, each bean leaf was placed on a cotton layer soaked with water. Additionally, seven different densities (i.e., 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128) of T. urticae nymphs and eight replicates for each density were conducted to record their functional response. One predator (48–72 h old) was introduced per leaf disc immediately after spreading the prey on a bean leaf and the number of the consumed prey was counted after 24 h. These experiments were conducted in the same conditions as the life table experiments (i.e., at 25 ± 1°C and 65 ± 10% RH and a photoperiod of 16L:8D h).

The type of functional response was determined using a polynomial function presented in Juliano (Reference Juliano, Scheiner and Gurevitch2001). Further, to estimate the functional response parameters including the handling time (T h) and attack rate (a), Rogers' (Reference Rogers1972) random predator equation was employed for type II functional responses using the SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Furthermore, the general linear model was conducted utilizing the SPSS software, version 22, to analyze prey consumption. Eventually, the pairwise multiple comparison procedures were performed using the Tukey test since the interaction between the main factors (i.e., the predator strain and prey density) was significant (P < 0.05).

Results

Life history traits

The developmental time of A. swirskii did not differ between the diets in G4, but was significantly faster on almond pollen compared to maize pollen by G6 (table 1). Additionally, on both types of pollen, the pre-adult duration of the sixth generation was significantly faster than the fourth generation. There was no interaction among the main factors affecting developmental time (F = 3.359, df = 1, P = 0.069). Females and males reared on maize pollen lived significantly longer compared to those reared on almond pollen in both the fourth and sixth generations (table 1). Regarding female and male adult longevity, there was no interaction between diet and generation (female: F = 0.140, df = 1, P = 0.710; male: F = 3.878, df = 1, P = 0.057).

Table 1. Different life stage duration, development time, and adult longevity (mean ± SE, in days) of Amblyseius swirskii fed in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets

The standard errors were calculated using the bootstrap procedure with 40,000 bootstraps. The means followed by different letters in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05, paired-bootstrap test).

Generation had no effect on life span for females (table 1). The impact of generation was less clear on males, differing depending on diet. Males raised on almond pollen had significantly longer lives in the G6 generation, but those raised on maize pollen had significantly shorter lives in the G6 generation.

Despite similar longevity, females reared on almond pollen laid significantly more eggs than those reared on maize pollen, and also had a shorter pre-ovipositional period (table 2). A similar trend was found in pre-oviposition periods (APOP, TPOP; table 2), as indicated by the significant interaction between the main factors (APOP: F = 72.823, df = 1, P < 0.0001; TPOP: F = 5.495, df = 1, P = 0.021; Fecundity: F = 99.832, df = 1, P < 0.0001).

Table 2. Reproduction and reproductive periods (mean ± SE) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets

APOP, adult preovipositional period; TPOP, total preovipositional period (from egg to first oviposition).

The standard errors were calculated using the bootstrap procedure with 40,000 bootstraps. The means followed by different letters in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05, paired-bootstrap test).

Generation also exerted a significant influence on the fecundity of A. swirskii. By G6, females reared on almond pollen had significantly longer ovipositional periods, and also greater fecundity, while those reared on maize pollen had significantly shorter ovipositional periods and significantly lower fecundity (table 2).

Survival and fecundity curves

On almond pollen, the highest survival rate of females (0.634) and males (0.292) in G6 was higher than that of G4 (i.e., 0.579 and 0.263, respectively) (fig. 1). However, when maize pollen was offered, the survival rate of females and males was highest in G6 and G4, respectively.

Figure 1. Age-stage-specific survival rate (s xj) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets. (a) Almond pollen/G4. (b) Almond pollen/G6. (c) Maize pollen/G4. (d) Maize pollen/G6.

The maximal value of m x was 1.719 eggs individual−1 day−1 (on almond pollen/G4), 1.595 (on maize pollen/G4), 1.710 (on almond pollen/G6), and 1.968 (on maize pollen/G6) (fig. 2). Finally, the overlap among different stages of the survival rates cannot be perceived in the age-specific survivorship (l x) curves (fig. 2) compared to s xj curves (fig. 1).

Figure 2. Age-specific survivorship (l x), age-stage fecundity of female (f x5), and age-specific fecundity (m x) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets. (a) Almond pollen/G4. (b) Almond pollen/G6. (c) Maize pollen/G4. (d) Maize pollen/G6.

Population growth parameters

The population growth parameters are influenced by both diet and generation (table 3). In both generations, the individuals reared on almond pollen demonstrated significantly higher gross and net reproductive rate. As regards net reproductive rate, females fed on almond pollen had significantly higher R 0 values in G4 compared with those raised on maize pollen. Furthermore, the intrinsic (r) and finite (λ) rates of increase in G6 were significantly higher compared to G4, but on a diet of maize pollen, similar growth rates were observed in both generations (table 3).

Table 3. Population growth parameters (mean ± SE) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets

The standard errors were calculated using the bootstrap procedure with 40,000 bootstraps. The means followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different between diets using the paired bootstrap test (P < 0.05). (GRR: gross reproductive rate; R 0: net reproductive rate; r: intrinsic rate of increase; λ: finite rate of increase; T: mean generation time).

Functional response

Based on the results, a type II functional response (i.e., a curvilinear rise) to T. urticae nymphs was revealed for all the tested strains (table 4 and fig. 3). Additionally, the linear coefficient was negative on three strains approaching a plateau at higher prey densities (fig. 3). The maximum attack rate (T/T h, 59.524 prey day−1) and the minimum handling time (0.4032 h) were observed for the mites reared on almond pollen (strain A) (table 5). In addition, the attack rate (a) of the individuals reared on T. urticae (strain T) was higher than on almond pollen and the latter was itself higher than on maize pollen (strain M).

Figure 3. The functional response (type II) of Amblyseius swirskii from three strains (T, A, and M) on different densities of Tetranychus urticae. (a) Strain A: the mass-reared predator on the almond pollen. (b) Strain T: the mass-reared predator on T. urticae. (c) Strain M: the mass-reared predator on the maize pollen.

Table 4. Maximum-likelihood estimates from logistic regression of the proportion of Tetranychus urticae nymphs consumed by different strains of Amblyseius swirskii as a function of initial prey density

Strain A: the mass-reared predator on the almond pollen; strain T: the mass-reared predator on T. urticae; strain M: the mass-reared predator on the maize pollen.

Table 5. Estimate (±SE) of instantaneous attack rate and handling time of three strains of Amblyseius swirskii on nymphs of Tetranychus urticae using the Rogers type II model

(a) Attack rate, T h; handling time, T/T h; maximum attack rate, R 2 = [1–(residual sum of squares/corrected total sum of squares)]. Strain A: the mass-reared predator on the almond pollen; strain T: the mass-reared predator on T. urticae; strain M: the mass-reared predator on the maize pollen.

The interaction between the main factors, namely, T. urticae density and A. swirskii strain, is significant for mean prey consumption (table 6). As shown, no difference was observed between the mean number of the prey consumed for the mites reared on almond pollen (strain A) and T. urticae (strain T) at all prey densities (table 7). Eventually, A. swirskii fed on maize pollen (strain M) consumed fewer numbers of T. urticae nymphs per day compared to A and T strains, particularly at higher prey densities.

Table 6. General linear model indicating the effect of strains (either the mass-reared predator on the almond pollen or T. urticae or the maize pollen) and prey densities (2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128) on prey consumption of Amblyseius swirskii

Table 7. Daily consumption (mean ± SE) of Tetranychus urticae nymphs by three strains of Amblyseius swirskii at different prey densities

The means followed by different letters in the table are significantly different (P < 0.01, Tukey test after 3 × 7 factorial design with the general linear model; factor 1: the strain of predator with three levels; factor 2: prey density with seven levels).

Strain A: the mass-reared predator on the almond pollen; strain T: the mass-reared predator on T. urticae; strain M: the mass-reared predator on the maize pollen.

Discussion

In the present study, the potential of two alternative pollen-only diets was in respect to the development and the reproduction of A. swirskii during six generations of rearing. Additionally, the effects of long-term rearing on these diets on the prey-capture ability of the predator were evaluated, finding that mites reared on almond pollen were just as effective as mites reared on a diet of natural prey. These results are relevant because the quality of the laboratory-reared organisms over time is highly significant for the mass production of biocontrol agents. Furthermore, pollen is a significantly cheaper food, thus reducing the costs of rearing these biocontrol agents.

Both the pre-adult development and total pre-oviposition period on almond pollen were significantly shorter and the fecundity was higher in G6 compared to the maize pollen in G4 (tables 1, 2). These reductions and increases exerted an influence on the intrinsic rate of increase in G6. Furthermore, the performance of the predator remained constant across the generations on maize pollen. More importantly, the population growth parameters on almond pollen in G4 and G6 in the current study were superior to those in G1 by Riahi et al. (Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017a, Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017b), indicating a trend of improved performance over generations.

This trend was also found by Nguyen et al. (Reference Nguyen, Vangansbeke and De Clercq2014), who assessed the fitness of A. swirskii on different factitious prey and artificial diets in the subsequent generations. Among the tested diets, only cysts of Artemia franciscana Kellogg led to an increase in the performance of the predator over the six generations. In addition, the demographic parameters of A. swirskii fed on almond pollen in both G4 and G6 (table 3) was better than previous results, whether it be natural prey (El-Laithy and Fouly, Reference El-Laithy and Fouly1992; Riahi et al., Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017b), different insects (Nomikou et al., Reference Nomikou, Janssen, Schraag and Sabelis2001; Wimmer et al., Reference Wimmer, Hoffmann and Schausberger2008), factitious prey (Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, Vangansbeke, Lü and De Clercq2013), or various artificial diets (Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, Bouguet, Spranghers, Vangansbeke and Clercq2015; Riahi et al., Reference Riahi, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017c). As a result, almond pollen is considered the most suitable diet for the rearing of A. swirskii.

The most important contributing factors influencing the functional response of predators are pesticides, the characteristics of the plant, the stage of the prey, the age of the predator, humidity, and diet (Castagnoli and Simoni, Reference Castagnoli and Simoni1999; Poletti et al., Reference Poletti, Maia and Omoto2007; Ahn et al., Reference Ahn, Kim and Lee2010; Farazmand et al., Reference Farazmand, Fathipour and Kamali2012; Khanamani et al., Reference Khanamani, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017). A type II functional response to T. urticae nymphs was recognized for all the three mass-produced predator strains (table 4), which corroborate with the findings of a great number of previous studies in this field (e.g., Xiao et al., Reference Xiao, Osborne, Chen and McKenzie2013; Fathipour et al., Reference Fathipour, Karimi, Farazmand and Talebi2017). Further, A. swirskii of strain M (i.e., mass-reared on maize pollen) and A (i.e., mass-reared on almond pollen) spent the longest and the shortest amount of the handling time to consume the prey, respectively (table 5). In other words, the individuals of strain A allocated a shorter time to non-searching activities (e.g., resting) compared to strains M and T, which resulted in an increased predation rate. Furthermore, the values of a and T h reported by Fathipour et al. (Reference Fathipour, Karimi, Farazmand and Talebi2017) represented lower attack rates and handling times of A. swirskii on T. urticae compared to the data obtained by the present study. These differences may be due to the dissimilation in the applied prey stages, the nutritional history of the predator, and the host plant used for T. urticae rearing. Additionally, Khanamani et al. (Reference Khanamani, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017) evaluated the attack rate and handling time values of Neoseiulus californicus McGregor females after 20 generations of mass-rearing on almond pollen and T. urticae. Their a and T h values were higher and lower, respectively, compared to the results of the current study regarding the corresponding values on similar prey stages.

Although the mass-rearing of a biocontrol agent on foods other than the prey has various advantages, sustaining the ability to find and kill the target prey is vital (Grenier and De Clercq, Reference Grenier, De Clercq and van Lenteren2003). Considering the results of the present study, A. swirskii maintains its ability to find, seize, and kill its natural prey (i.e., T. urticae) after the six generations of rearing on almond and maize pollen. These findings are consistent with the results of other studies that reported successful predation ability of phytoseiid mites after multiple generations of rearing on different food diets (e.g., Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, Vangansbeke and De Clercq2014; Khanamani et al., Reference Khanamani, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017). Furthermore, the results of the current study showed that the daily predation rate of A. swirskii mass-reared on maize pollen was considerably lower compared to natural prey and almond pollen diets, which may be due to the longer handling time and the lower attack rate estimated by the model (tables 5, 7). Furthermore, the individuals of strains A and T consumed the same number of prey during the period of 24 h at different prey densities. In other studies, Khanamani et al. (Reference Khanamani, Fathipour, Talebi and Mehrabadi2017) found that the predation rate of N. californicus was the same between individuals mass-reared on almond pollen and T. urticae at lower prey densities. Nguyen et al. (Reference Nguyen, Vangansbeke and De Clercq2014), who explored predation rates of A. swirskii on immature Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) reared on five different diets over six generations, found that most diets had no effect. The exception was Ephestia kuehniella Zeller eggs, where females of the first generation killed more prey compared to the sixth generation.

In conclusion, we showed that A. swirskii successfully develops and reproduces on almond pollen, with increased performance over generations in several parameters. In contrast, maize pollen is a poor diet for mass-rearing of A. swirskii, with decreased performance over generations. More surprisingly, mites reared on almond pollen were equivalent or even better than mites reared on natural prey. This finding has important implications for developing the mass-rearing program of A. swirskii on non-prey food items. However, more studies are needed regarding evaluating the suitability of the almond pollen in the large-scale cultures of A. swirskii. Finally, other studies concerning the effects of long-term rearing (beyond ten generations) of A. swirskii on almond pollen are subject to further investigation.

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr Owen Seeman (Queensland Museum), South Brisbane, for his valuable efforts to improve the use of English in and organization of the text, and promoting the manuscript structure, and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. In addition, all support of this research by Vice Chancellery of Research and Technology of Shahrekord University is deeply appreciated.

References

Ahn, JJ, Kim, KW and Lee, JH (2010) Functional response of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on strawberry leaves. Journal of Applied Entomology 134, 98104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolckmans, KJF and van Houten, YM (2006) Mite composition, use thereof, method for rearing the phytoseiid predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii, rearing system for rearing said phytoseiid mite and methods for biological pest control on a crop. WO Patent WO/2006/057552.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, M and Simoni, S (1999) Effect of long-term feeding history on functional and numerical response of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 23, 217234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, H (1988) Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environmental Entomology 17, 2634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, H (2016) TWOSEX-MSChart: a computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis. Available at http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/Download/TWOSEX-MSChart.rar (Accessed February 2016).Google Scholar
Chi, H and Liu, H (1985) Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica 24, 225240.Google Scholar
Cohen, AC (2004) Insect Diets: Science and Technology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
De Clercq, P, Arijs, Y, van Meir, T, van Stappen, G, Sorgeloos, P, Dewettinck, K, Rey, M, Grenier, S and Febvay, G (2005) Nutritional value of brine shrimp cysts as a factitious food for Orius laevigatus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 15, 467479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Laithy, AYM and Fouly, AH (1992) Life table parameters of the two phytoseiid predators Amblyseius scutalis (Athias-Henriot) and A. swirskii A.-H. (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Egypt. Journal of Applied Entomology 113, 812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y and Petit, FL (1994) Functional response of Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes on two spotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 18, 613621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farazmand, A, Fathipour, Y and Kamali, K (2012) Functional response and mutual interference of Neoseiulus californicus and Typhlodromus bagdasarjani (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). International Journal of Acarology 38, 369376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathipour, Y and Maleknia, B (2016) Mite predators. In Omkar, (ed.), Ecofriendly Pest Management for Food Security. San Diego, USA: Elsevier, pp. 329366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathipour, Y, Karimi, M, Farazmand, A and Talebi, AA (2017) Age-specific functional response and predation rate of Amblyseius swirskii (Phytoseiidae) on two-spotted spider mite. Systematic and Applied Acarology 22(2), 159169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidgett, MJ and Stinson, CSA (2008) Method for rearing predatory mites. WO Patent WO/2008/015, 393.Google Scholar
Grenier, S and De Clercq, P (2003) Comparison of artificially vs naturally reared natural enemies and their potential for use in biological control. In van Lenteren, J (ed.) Quality Control and Production of Biological Control Agents. Theory and Testing Procedures. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CABI Publishing, pp. 115131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juliano, SA (2001) Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In Scheiner, SM and Gurevitch, J (eds), Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 178196.Google Scholar
Khanamani, M, Fathipour, Y, Talebi, AA and Mehrabadi, M (2017) Quantitative analysis of long-term mass rearing of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on almond pollen. Journal of Economic Entomology 110(4), 14421450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurtry, JA, Moraes, GJDE and Sourassou, NF (2013) Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 18, 297320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, DT, Vangansbeke, D, , X and De Clercq, P (2013) Development and reproduction of the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii on artificial diets. BioControl 58, 369377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, DT, Vangansbeke, D and De Clercq, P (2014) Artificial and factitious foods support the development and reproduction of the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii. Experimental and Applied Acarology 62, 181194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, DT, Bouguet, V, Spranghers, T, Vangansbeke, D and Clercq, PD (2015) Beneficial effect of supplementing an artificial diet for Amblyseius swirskii with Hermetia illucens haemolymph. Journal of Applied Entomology 139, 342351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomikou, M, Janssen, A, Schraag, R and Sabelis, MW (2001) Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci. Experimental and Applied Acarology 25, 271291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poletti, M, Maia, AHN and Omoto, C (2007) Toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides to Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus macropilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and their impact on functional response to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biological Control 40, 3036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riahi, E, Fathipour, Y, Talebi, AA and Mehrabadi, M (2016) Pollen quality and predator viability: life table of Typhlodromus bagdasarjani on seven different plant pollens and two-spotted spider mite. Systematic and Applied Acarology 21, 13991412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riahi, E, Fathipour, Y, Talebi, AA and Mehrabadi, M (2017 a) Linking life table and consumption rate of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in presence and absence of different pollens. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 110, 244253.Google Scholar
Riahi, E, Fathipour, Y, Talebi, AA and Mehrabadi, M (2017 b) Natural diets vs factitious prey: comparative effects on development, fecundity and life table of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 22, 711723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riahi, E, Fathipour, Y, Talebi, AA and Mehrabadi, M (2017 c) Attempt to develop cost-effective rearing of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae): assessment of different artificial diets. Journal of Economic Entomology 110(4), 15251532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riahi, E, Fathipour, Y, Talebi, AA and Mehrabadi, M (2018) Factitious prey and artificial diets: do they all have the potential to facilitate rearing of Typhlodromus bagdasarjani (Acari: Phytoseiidae)? International Journal of Acarology 44(2–3), 121128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, D (1972) Random search and insect population models. Journal of Animal Ecology 41, 369383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipp, JL and Whitfield, GH (1991) Functional response of the predatory mite, Amblyseius cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Environmental Entomology 20, 694699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, D, Hoffmann, D and Schausberger, P (2008) Prey suitability of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, and onion thrips, Thrips tabaci, for the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii. Biocontrol Science and Technology 18, 541550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Y, Osborne, LS, Chen, J and McKenzie, CL (2013) Functional responses and prey-stage preferences of a predatory gall midge and two predacious mites with two spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae, as host. Journal of Insect Science 13, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Different life stage duration, development time, and adult longevity (mean ± SE, in days) of Amblyseius swirskii fed in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets

Figure 1

Table 2. Reproduction and reproductive periods (mean ± SE) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets

Figure 2

Figure 1. Age-stage-specific survival rate (sxj) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets. (a) Almond pollen/G4. (b) Almond pollen/G6. (c) Maize pollen/G4. (d) Maize pollen/G6.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Age-specific survivorship (lx), age-stage fecundity of female (fx5), and age-specific fecundity (mx) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets. (a) Almond pollen/G4. (b) Almond pollen/G6. (c) Maize pollen/G4. (d) Maize pollen/G6.

Figure 4

Table 3. Population growth parameters (mean ± SE) of Amblyseius swirskii in the fourth (G4) and sixth (G6) generations on two pollen diets

Figure 5

Figure 3. The functional response (type II) of Amblyseius swirskii from three strains (T, A, and M) on different densities of Tetranychus urticae. (a) Strain A: the mass-reared predator on the almond pollen. (b) Strain T: the mass-reared predator on T. urticae. (c) Strain M: the mass-reared predator on the maize pollen.

Figure 6

Table 4. Maximum-likelihood estimates from logistic regression of the proportion of Tetranychus urticae nymphs consumed by different strains of Amblyseius swirskii as a function of initial prey density

Figure 7

Table 5. Estimate (±SE) of instantaneous attack rate and handling time of three strains of Amblyseius swirskii on nymphs of Tetranychus urticae using the Rogers type II model

Figure 8

Table 6. General linear model indicating the effect of strains (either the mass-reared predator on the almond pollen or T. urticae or the maize pollen) and prey densities (2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128) on prey consumption of Amblyseius swirskii

Figure 9

Table 7. Daily consumption (mean ± SE) of Tetranychus urticae nymphs by three strains of Amblyseius swirskii at different prey densities