Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:07:28.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barnacle recruitment on ice-scoured shores in eastern Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

Elizabeth A. MacPherson
Affiliation:
St Francis Xavier University, Department of Biology, Antigonish, Nova Scotia B2G 2W5, Canada
Ricardo Scrosati*
Affiliation:
St Francis Xavier University, Department of Biology, Antigonish, Nova Scotia B2G 2W5, Canada
Patrick Chareka
Affiliation:
St Francis Xavier University, Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Antigonish, Nova Scotia B2G 2W5, Canada
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Ricardo ScrosatiSt Francis Xavier UniversityDepartment of Biology Antigonish Nova Scotia B2G 2W5Canada email: rscrosat@stfx.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous observations in the St Lawrence Estuary (eastern Canada) suggested that larvae of intertidal barnacles (Semibalanus balanoides) would settle almost exclusively inside crevices on shores that are scoured by sea ice every winter. It was suggested that the strong ice scour in winter on that coast (which removes organisms outside of crevices) would select for such a larval behaviour. We tested the generality of this pattern by sampling other ice-scoured shores within the Gulf of St Lawrence system. In particular, we surveyed a shore in Nova Scotia where exposed habitats (subjected to strong ice scour in winter) are interspersed with sheltered habitats (which suffer milder ice scour). Such a topographical complexity might allow for the coastal larval pool to contain a proportion of larvae that have no particular settlement preference for crevices, as selective pressures for such a behaviour would be minimal in ice-sheltered habitats. Consistently with this notion, barnacle recruits (which appear after the winter ice melts) occurred abundantly both inside and outside of crevices across the shore in the spring seasons of 2005 and 2006. Average recruit density on rocky surfaces ranged between 337 and 588 recruits dm−2, depending on the habitat. It is therefore possible that barnacle recruitment patterns on ice-scoured shores may be affected indirectly by the structural complexity of the coast.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Recruitment, or the addition of young individuals to a population, is one of the major components of population dynamics (Underwood & Keough, Reference Underwood, Keough and Bertness2001). In intertidal barnacle populations from the St Lawrence Estuary, in eastern Canada, adult organisms are restricted to crevices (Bergeron & Bourget, Reference Bergeron and Bourget1986). Such a characteristic spatial pattern is related to ice scour, which results from the widespread formation of sea ice across the entire Gulf of St Lawrence system every winter (Saucier et al., Reference Saucier, Roy, Gilbert, Pellerin and Ritchie2003). Crevices act as refuges for barnacles against the physical effects of moving ice. The recruitment period for this barnacle species, Semibalanus balanoides (Linnaeus, 1766), is limited to a few months on the north-western Atlantic coast, usually earlier in the year in southern locations (Bousfield, Reference Bousfield1954; Minchinton & Scheibling, Reference Minchinton and Scheibling1991; Pineda et al., Reference Pineda, Starczak and Stueckle2006). In the St Lawrence Estuary, barnacle larvae settle almost exclusively in crevices (Bergeron & Bourget, Reference Bergeron and Bourget1986), in contrast with the open Atlantic coast (which does not undergo ice scour), where larvae settle extensively across rocky intertidal surfaces (Bourget et al., Reference Bourget, Martel, Lapointe, Bussières, Garbary and South1990). It was suggested that selective pressures (intense ice scour outside of crevices) may have determined the larval preference for settlement in crevices in the St Lawrence Estuary (Chabot & Bourget, Reference Chabot and Bourget1988). To test the generality of this pattern, we investigated barnacle recruitment on other ice-scoured shores within the Gulf of St Lawrence system. In particular, we surveyed topographically complex sections of the coast where areas subjected to intense winter ice scour are interspersed with areas subjected to mild ice scour. We asked the question whether this complex structural pattern on the coast would be associated with a different recruitment pattern than the one described for the St Lawrence Estuary.

We surveyed Sea Spray Shore (45° 46′ N 62° 9′ W), near Arisaig, on the southern coast of the Gulf of St Lawrence, Nova Scotia, Canada. The substrate of this subarctic coast is primarily volcanic bedrock with high rugosity. Surface seawater temperature ranges between monthly averages of -1.4 °C and 18.2 °C in this region, while surface seawater salinity ranges between monthly averages of 28.4‰ and 30.6‰ (Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2007). Sea ice forms in early winter and melts between late winter and early spring (Saucier et al., Reference Saucier, Roy, Gilbert, Pellerin and Ritchie2003), normally late March or April at Sea Spray Shore. On this coast, Semibalanus balanoides is the only species of intertidal barnacle. At Sea Spray Shore, habitats directly facing open waters (exposed habitats) are subjected to strong ice scour in winter (see values in Scrosati & Heaven, Reference Scrosati and Heaven2006) and strong wave action during the ice-free period (see values in Scrosati & Heaven, Reference Scrosati and Heaven2007). Habitats protected by outer rocky formations (sheltered habitats) are subjected to significantly lower values of ice scour and wave action (Scrosati & Heaven, Reference Scrosati and Heaven2006, Reference Scrosati and Heaven2007). Barnacle recruits appear on this shore normally in May. On 7–8 June 2005 and 7–10 June 2006, after all sea ice from the preceding winter seasons had completely melted, we measured the density of barnacle adults and recruits in one exposed habitat and one sheltered habitat that were visually representative of the entire coast. Recruits were much smaller than adults at the time of sampling (Figure 1), so both life-history stages could easily be differentiated. In each habitat, we laid a 20 m transect line across the mid–high intertidal zone and counted the number of barnacle adults and recruits in 30, 100 cm2 random quadrats.

Fig. 1. Intertidal zone of an exposed habitat at Sea Spray Shore viewed in the spring (June), showing adult barnacles restricted to crevices and barnacle recruits occurring extensively across the rocky substrate, both inside and outside of crevices. Note the pronounced size difference between adults and recruits. Photograph by R. Scrosati.

We found that barnacle recruits occurred abundantly throughout the rocky substrate, both inside and outside of crevices (Figure 1). Recruits were significantly more abundant than adults in sheltered and exposed habitats in both years (Student's t-tests, P < 0.05; Figure 2). In each year, the density of recruits was similar between exposed and sheltered habitats (Student's t-tests, P > 0.05; Figure 2). Barnacle adults were restricted to crevices in the exposed habitat, whereas they occurred both inside and outside of crevices in the sheltered habitat, apparently as a result of the milder ice scour that occurs in winter there.

Fig. 2. Density (individuals dm−2; means ± SE) of barnacle adults and recruits in exposed and sheltered habitats at Sea Spray Shore in the spring (June) of 2005 and 2006 (N = 30 quadrats for each case).

The massive barnacle recruitment occurring everywhere on rocky surfaces on the outer Gulf of St Lawrence stands in sharp contrast with the spatially selective recruitment in crevices in the St Lawrence Estuary. What might explain this regional difference along the same ice-scoured coastline? A long-term history of strong ice scour might indeed determine microhabitat selectivity in larvae through natural selection, as suggested by Chabot & Bourget (Reference Chabot and Bourget1988) to explain their findings in the St Lawrence Estuary. However, in habitats where ice scour is relatively mild, settlement inside crevices is less critical for population persistence, as several organisms settling outside of crevices will also reach adult size. Thus, on topographically complex shores where sheltered habitats are interspersed with exposed habitats, the coastal larval pool (a mixture from various shore areas) would include many larvae without a particular spatial preference for settlement. Sea Spray Shore includes alternating areas subjected to strong and mild ice scour (Scrosati & Heaven, Reference Scrosati and Heaven2006), and larvae indeed settle both inside and outside of crevices everywhere on the shore, as we found. The selective potential of environmental factors on larval settlement behaviour in marine invertebrates has been investigated by a number of researchers (Todd, 1998; Morgan, Reference Morgan and Bertness2001). Our study suggests that ice scour, a rarely considered factor in terms of larval ecology (Barnes & Conlan, Reference Barnes and Conlan2007), might also affect the evolution of settlement behaviour in barnacles. Experimental studies on this topic should therefore improve our understanding of barnacle population dynamics in polar and subpolar shores.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study resulted from the BSc Honours thesis of E.A. MacPherson. Funding was provided by grants from the Canada Research Chair (CRC) programme, the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the St Francis Xavier University Council for Research (UCR) to R. Scrosati and by an Undergraduate Student Research Award (USRA) to E.A. MacPherson. We thank Lindsay Eckersley, Heather MacDonald, and Martha MacPherson, for field assistance, and two anonymous referees, for their constructive comments.

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, D.K.A. and Conlan, K.E. (2007) Disturbance, colonization, and development of Antarctic benthic communities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 362, 1138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergeron, P. and Bourget, E. (1986) Shore topography and spatial partitioning of crevice refuges by sessile epibenthos in an ice-disturbed environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 28, 129145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourget, E., Martel, N., Lapointe, L. and Bussières, D. (1990) Behavioural, morphological, and genetic changes in some North Atlantic populations of the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. In Garbary, D.J. and South, G.R. (eds) Evolutionary biogeography of the marine algae of the North Atlantic. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 87106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, E.L. (1954) The distribution and spawning seasons of barnacles on the Atlantic coast of Canada. Bulletin of the National Museum of Canada 132, 112154.Google Scholar
Chabot, R. and Bourget, E. (1988) Influence of substratum heterogeneity and settled barnacle density on the settlement of cypris larvae. Marine Biology 97, 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (2007) Temperature–salinity climatologies. [online] Available from http://www.mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/ocean/tsdata.html [accessed 9 July 2007]Google Scholar
Minchinton, T.E. and Scheibling, R.E. (1991) The influence of larval supply and settlement on the population structure of barnacles. Ecology 72, 18671879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, S.G. (2001) The larval ecology of marine communities. In Bertness, M.D. et al. (eds) Marine community ecology. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, pp. 159181.Google Scholar
Pineda, J., Starczak, V. and Stueckle, T.A. (2006) Timing of successful settlement: demonstration of a recruitment window in the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. Marine Ecology Progress Series 320, 233237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saucier, F.J., Roy, F., Gilbert, D., Pellerin, P. and Ritchie, H. (2003) Modeling the formation and circulation processes of water masses and sea ice in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. Journal of Geophysical Research 108, C8, 3269, doi:10.1029/2000JC000686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrosati, R. and Heaven, C. (2006) Field technique to quantify intensity of scouring by sea ice in rocky intertidal habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 320, 293295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrosati, R. and Heaven, C. (2007) Spatial trends in community richness, diversity, and evenness across rocky intertidal environmental stress gradients in eastern Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series 342, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Keough, M.J. (2001) Supply-side ecology. The nature and consequences of variations in recruitment of intertidal organisms. In Bertness, M.D. et al. (eds) Marine community ecology. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, pp. 183200.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Intertidal zone of an exposed habitat at Sea Spray Shore viewed in the spring (June), showing adult barnacles restricted to crevices and barnacle recruits occurring extensively across the rocky substrate, both inside and outside of crevices. Note the pronounced size difference between adults and recruits. Photograph by R. Scrosati.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Density (individuals dm−2; means ± SE) of barnacle adults and recruits in exposed and sheltered habitats at Sea Spray Shore in the spring (June) of 2005 and 2006 (N = 30 quadrats for each case).