Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T08:04:05.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification and characterization of anonymous nuclear markers for the double-striped cockroach, Blattella bisignata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2012

Q.-P. Ren
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China
Z. Fan
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China
X.-M. Zhou
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China
G.-F. Jiang*
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China
Y.-T. Wang
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China
Y.-X. Liu
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +86-2585891163 E-mail: cnjgf1208@gmail.com, cnjgf1208@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the last decade, multilocus analysis has gradually become a powerful tool for the studies of population genetics and phylogeography. The double-striped cockroach, Blattella bisignata, is endemic to southeast Asia, and there is currently little genetic information available for the species. We chose it as the target species to investigate a biodiversity hotspot in southwest China. Here, we report the identification and characterization of 11 single-copy anonymous nuclear markers with an average length of 378bp. These loci, isolated from a genomic library of B. bisignata, can amplify in two additional Blattella species (B. germanica and B. lituricollis). While testing these markers in representative species of Blattellidae, Blattidae and Epilampridae, some of them can cross-amplify successfully. After sequencing 30 individuals collected from southern China per locus, we found relatively high variability (approximately 3.6 SNPs per 100bp). Finally, a small-scale study was also performed to show that these markers do indeed fulfill the expectations as phylogeographic markers.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Introduction

Insects account for a large proportion of all known organisms, and as such they inevitably play a pivotal role in many ecosystems. Southwest China is one of the biodiversity hotspots of the world, and the insect populations in the region have been largely understudied. Cockroaches (Blattaria) are abundant in southwest China, yet little attention has been given to the phylogeography of the group. Understanding the geographical pattern and population structure of molecular variance within a species of Blattaria is very important to infer its origin, given that variance truly exists in the wild (de Bruyn et al., Reference de Bruyn, Grail and Carvalho2011). The double-striped cockroach, Blattella bisignata, is a wild species, which has the ability to fly over short distance, and mainly lives in leaf litter, grass or shrubs in forested areas. As the double-striped cockroach is native to southeast Asia (the epicenter for Blattella diversity), which remained uncovered by ice sheets during the Pleistocene (Williams et al., Reference Williams, Dunkerley, de Deckker, Kershaw and Chappel1998), we expect geographic structuring detectable at the genetic level. Currently, there is no information on the phylogeography of B. bisignata in southern China.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a popular marker for population genetic, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies. However, mtDNA is inherited maternally and is non-recombining, which may reveal an incomplete population history when sex bias exists in dispersal (Hare, Reference Hare2001). Microsatellites, on the other hand, are extremely popular because of their high mutant rates and strong power to reveal geographic structure, historical demography and parentage, which have been used in studies of the population genetic structure of the German cockroach (Crissman et al., Reference Crissman, Booth, Santangelo, Mukha, Vargo and Schal2010; Booth et al., Reference Booth, Santangelo, Vargo, Mukha and Schal2011). Selection pressure on microsatellite loci has been previously reported (Schlotterer, Reference Schlotterer2000), thus it is important to verify that loci are not under selection before proceeding with analysis. The difference in microsatellite variations between sex chromosomes and autosomes is a representative example of such differential selection (Bachtrog et al., Reference Bachtrog, Weiss, Zangerl, Brem and Schlotterer1999). Furthermore, ‘null alleles’ sometimes fail to amplify during PCR, which can generate problems during analysis. However, all types of markers have some disadvantages, and the versatility of microsatellites in addressing many ecological questions compensates for their limitations (Selkoe & Toonen, Reference Selkoe and Toonen2006). Currently, EPICs (Exon-primed intron-crossing) are widely used in a variety of organisms, which need a certain number of genomic resources. When comparing EPICs with ANMs (anonymous nuclear markers), it has been demonstrated that the variability of ANMs is significantly higher than that of EPICs (Lee & Edwards, Reference Lee and Edwards2008). Furthermore, EPICs are more likely to undergo purifying selection because they are located near gene regions (Thomson et al., Reference Thomson, Wang and Johnson2010), whereas ANMs locate at intergenic regions.

With the massive influx of genomic resources for model organisms and the transcriptome underway for nonmodel organisms (Amaral et al., Reference Amaral, Silva, Moeller, Beheregaray and Coelho2010), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have recently been chosen as markers for a growing number of studies (Knowles & Carstens, Reference Knowles and Carstens2007; Raychoudhury et al., Reference Raychoudhury, Grillenberger, Gadau, Bijlsma, van de Zande, Werren and Beukeboom2010). Given that there is little genomic information available for B. bisignata, we develop in our study 11 anonymous single-copy nuclear polymorphic sequence (SCNP) markers, with the aim of resolving the species’ dispersal pattern in southern China. These markers are seldom screened in insects, but recently were reported for Melanoplus oregonensis (Carstens & Knowles, Reference Carstens and Knowles2006) and in Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii (Hamm, Reference Hamm2012).

Previous phylogeographic and population genetic studies of Blattaria have relied mainly on mitochondrial sequences (Chinn & Gemmell, Reference Chinn and Gemmell2004; Maekawa et al., Reference Maekawa, Kon, Matsumoto, Kitade and Araya2007), microsatellites (Booth et al., Reference Booth, Bogdanowicz, Prodohl, Harrison, Schal and Vargo2007) and rDNA-RFLP (Mukha et al., Reference Mukha, Kagramanova, Lazebnaya, Lazebnnyi, Vargo and Schal2007). Considering all of the points addressed above, our findings may prove valuable for further population studies.

Materials and methods

Collection of samples

Collection sites and the number of individuals used in our study are shown in fig. 1. All the individuals were collected from five different locations in southern China and stored in 100% ethanol. The details of sampling sites are in table S1.

Fig. 1. Sampling sites: 1, Jinghong (JH); 2, Baise (BS); 3, Mayanghe (MYH); 4, Anqing (AQ); 5, Zhenjing (ZJ). M01, Hengduan Mountain Range; M02, Phoenix Mountain.

Genomic library construction and cloning

We constructed a genomic library from a fresh B. bisignata specimen sampled from Baohua Mountain (Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China). Tissue was obtained from the dorsal anterior thorax, and total genomic DNA was extracted following standard phenol-chloroform procedures (Sambrook et al., Reference Sambrook, Fritsch and Maniatis1989). The extract was concentrated to 3.2μgμl–1 (assayed using a NanoDrop® ND-3300 Fluorospectrometer (PeqLab, Erlangen, Germany)) using a vacufuge (Eppendorf, Cambridge, UK). About 15μg of DNA was fragmented by restriction digest using AfaI (RsaI) for over six hours. The sheared DNA was visualised on a 1.5% agarose gel, and the target products ranging from 0.75 to 1.5kb were excised with sterile blades and purified using a QIAGEN Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hiden, Germany) (eluted in 50μl elution buffer). This size-selected DNA was vacufuged from the initial concentration of 15ngμl–1 to a final concentration of 45ngμl–1 in order to reach the proper molar ratio (>10:1) for insertion into the vector for optimal blunt-ended ligation. Approximately 150ng of DNA was ligated into 25ng of PCR Zero Blunt vector (Invitrogen, NY, USA), then transformed into chemically-competent One Shot TOP10 E. coli cells (Invitrogen). These were then plated on LB agar plates containing kanamycin (50μgml–1) and grown overnight in an incubator at 37 °C following the method described by Noonan & Yoder (Reference Noonan and Yoder2009).

Finally, we picked 96 colonies individually into 1.5ml SOB-kan (50μgml–1) liquid medium using autoclaved pipette tips, and grown overnight at 37 °C with continuous gentle shaking. Each PCR reaction was 16.5μl, containing 15μl TransTaq PCR SuperMix (Beijing TransGen Biotech Co., Beijing, China), 0.5μl of each primer (M13F (–20) & R provided with the Invitrogen kit), and a 0.5μl template directly pipetted from each individual overnight culture. These 96 PCR products were subsequently visualised on a 1% agarose gel to confirm the product size. We chose 80 products to sequence, ranging in size from 800 to 1500bp, using the primers used in PCR on an ABI-PRISM™ 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Amplification of loci

Fifty sequences were excluded, either because they aligned with other sequences via local BLAST (n = 16), were extremely AT rich (n = 9), returned positive BLAST hits against coding sequences, SINEs (short interspersed repetitive element) or other retrotransposons (n = 11, B. germanica × 5, Bombyx mori × 2, Nasonia × 1, Reticulitermes flavipes × 1, Aedes aegypti × 2) or did not sequence properly (n = 14). The remaining sequences were then translated into amino acid sequences. We chose 30 sequences, using the NCBI ORF finder (http://www.ncbl.nlh.gov/projects/gorf/), that were apparently from noncoding regions of the B. bisignata genome, after which we designed species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for the sequences. Primer design was carried out using Primer Premier 5.0 (Clarke & Gorley, Reference Clarke and Gorley2001). These primers were tested on a small panel (two individuals from B. bisignata, and one each from B. germanica and B. lituricolliss) and a distantly related cockroach, Eupolyphaga sinensis Walker (Eupolyphaga). A 25μl volume containing 2.5μl 10 × LA PCR Buffer, 0.4mM of each dNTP, 1.25 units of LA Taq polymerase (TaKaRa Biotech, Dalian, China), 2.5mM MgCl2, 0.5μl each of primers and approximately 10ng of DNA was used per PCR with the following protocol: initial denature 94 °C for 5min, 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30s, optimal X°C for 30s (see table 1 for locus-specific annealing temperatures), 72 °C for 30s and a final extension at 72 °C for 10min. PCR products with single amplified bands were first purified and then subcloned in one individual per locus. Finally, 4–5 clones were sequenced in both the forward and reverse directions to make sure each locus was a single copy.

Table 1. Primer sequences (5′ − 3′) for 11 anonymous nuclear loci and optimal PCR annealing temperatures (°C) cross several cockroach species.

B.b., Blattella bisignata; B.g., Blattella germanica; B.l., Blattella lituricollis; J.t., Jacobsonina tortuosa; R.f., Rhabdoblatta formosana; P.a., Periplaneta americana; n/a, not applicable.

Data analysis

Sequence assembly was conducted using SeqMan (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA), and alignments were produced by Clustal W (Thompson et al., Reference Thompson, Higgins and Gibson1994). All alignments were checked visually, and sequences of different individuals for each locus were cut to equal length. The analyses of DNA sequence polymorphisms, such as number of variable sites (S), nucleotide diversity (π), and haplotype diversity (Hd), were calculated with DnaSP Version 5.00 (Librado & Rozas, Reference Librado and Rozas2009). We also calculated the minimum number of recombination events (Hudson & Kaplan, Reference Hudson and Kaplan1985), Tajima's D (Tajima, Reference Tajima1989) and LD (linkage disequilibrium) level for each marker with DnaSP Version 5.00. In the LD analysis, the chi-square test was used to estimate the significance of associations between all parsimony-informative polymorphic sites, following the Bonferroni procedure for multiple comparisons. In this study, the Dunn-Šidák correction was used instead of the the Bonferroni correction, because the Dunn-Šidák correction gives a stronger bound than the Bonferroni correction (Abdi, Reference Abdi and Salkind2007). Maximum parsimony (MP) and neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic analyses were used to identify major clades and evaluate the relationships among the haplotypes, using B. germanica as the outgroup. The model selected by the Akaike information criterion (AIC) in Modeltest 3.7 (Posada & Crandall, Reference Posada and Crandall1998) was used in the maximum parsimony analyses PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford, Reference Swofford2003). The NJ tree was constructed in MEGA 5 (Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Peterson, Peterson, Stecher, Nei and Kumar2011) with both bootstrap and interior branch support tests. The confidence level of the nodes in the NJ and MP trees were estimated using 1000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates. To test for hierarchical population genetic structure in B. bisignata, we performed analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) in ARLEQUIN 3.11 (Excoffier L. Zoological Institute, University of Berne, Switzerland) with 1000 permutations to examine partitioning of genetic diversity within and among populations. F ST values were calculated to evaluate genetic partitioning among populations. Mismatch distribution analyses were performed using ARLEQUIN 3.11 to detect recent demographic signatures of population expansions (Rogers, Reference Rogers1995).

Results and discussion

Cross-species amplification

Of all 30 loci, 11 loci may be ideal anonymous single-copy nuclear sequence markers because they amplified a single-copy product in three Blattella species and contained nucleotide variation, while only one locus (AL51) for E. sinensis. We also tested these 11 pairs of primers in other representative species of the cockroach families: Jacobsonina tortuosa (Blattellidae), Rhabdoblatta formosana (Epilampridae) and Periplaneta americana (Blattidae). Our study showed some loci can cross-amplify at high taxonomic levels, after testing all these loci in representative species of Blattellidae, Epilampridae and Blattidae, respectively (see table 1). As expected, cross-species amplification success decreased with increasing genetic distance. A previous study of the microsatellite loci in B. germanica (Booth et al., Reference Booth, Bogdanowicz, Prodohl, Harrison, Schal and Vargo2007) showed they were applicable to only one additional B. asahinai, but not to Parcoblatta pennsylvanica and Supella longipalpa (family Blattellidae), P. americana and P. fuliginosa (family Blattidae). High cross-species applicability of microsatellites loci in Hymenoptera (Henshaw et al., Reference Henshaw, Toth and Young2011), Diptera (Augustinos et al., Reference Augustinos, Asimakopoulou, Papadopoulos and Bourtzis2011) and Lepidoptera (Sinama et al., Reference Sinama, Dubut, Costedoat, Gilles, Junker, Malausa, Martin, Neve, Pech, Schmitt, Zimmermann and Meglecz2011) has been previously reported, so our anonymous single-copy nuclear markers were more time efficient and less costly to some extent, at least in Blattaria.

Genetic diversity

The primers were tested on B. bisignata individuals collected from southern China. Direct sequencing of PCR products was conducted twice as well as a clone strategy for some heterozygous individuals to obtain the precise sequences. A total number of 151 variable sites or SNPs were recognized in 4157bp sequenced markers with an average 3.6 SNPs per 100bp. The nucleotide variation observed in our loci is higher than that of grasshoppers (Carstens & Knowles, Reference Carstens and Knowles2006). See table 2 for the summary of data for these 11 loci. The nucleotide diversity (π) of each locus varied from 0.002 (AL57) to 0.018 (AL51). These differences likely result from the specific genomic locations of the sequences and their distances away from the neighbouring functional regions of the genes, which have been shown to influence substitution rates (Ji et al., 2011). It has been inferred that despite some conservative noncoding regions, many anonymous regions of the genome may be free from selection (Lee & Edwards, Reference Lee and Edwards2008). We detected recombination at six of the 11 loci (AL12, AL42, AL45, AL51, AL53, AL65), and no significant linkage disequilibrium (LD) was observed after correcting for multiple comparisons, indicating that these loci are unlinked.

Table 2. Summary data for 11 anonymous nuclear loci screened for variation in B.bisignata.

bp, size of alignable sequence in base pairs; N, sample size; S, number of variable sites; H, number of haplotypes; π, nucleotide diversity per site; Hd, Haplotype diversity; θw, Watterson's estimate of theta per site; indel, presence or absence of insertions/deletions; D, Tajima's D; LDD, the mean linkage disequilibrium (Hedrick, Reference Hedrick2005).

Population genetic structure and demographic analysis

The MP trees and NJ trees based on three anonymous loci (AL31, AL51, AL65) revealed relatively consistent results (figs 2–4). Both trees consisted of two main clades, and one clade contained haplotypes or individuals from JH and BS, while the other contained those from MYH, AQ and ZJ (tables S2–S4). We didn't find any shared haplotypes, which was likely a result of the lack of abundant sampling sites. AMOVA showed clear population genetic structure among the B. bisignata population (F ST varying from 0.52 to 0.87, P < 0.01). When we regarded every sample site as one population, the AMOVA based on haplotype frequencies analyses revealed that variations among populations were far greater than those within populations. We divided the populations from five sampling sites into two or three groups according to their geographic locations, and the F CT value achieved a maximum when they were divided into two groups (JH + BS and MYH + AQ + ZJ). This is consistent with results of MP and NJ trees to some extent. The pairwise F ST at all locations for three anonymous loci are shown in tables S5–S7. JH and BS have a relatively short genetic distance, and this is also true for AQ and ZJ. Not surprisingly, a long genetic distance was detected between the group (JH, BS) and group (AQ, ZJ). MYH was a debatable location for its closer geographical distance to JH and BS than AQ and ZJ, but the results showed its close relationship with the southeast populations (AQ and ZJ). Considering the locations of Phoenix Mountain and the Hengduan Mountain range (fig. 1), we infer that the mountains may have formed natural barriers to the expansion of B. bisignata. The mismatch distributions for all individuals of each loci did not consist of a distinct unimodal curve (figs S1–S3), which suggested that a massive population expansion in B. bisignata did not occur. The mild climate, the mountain barriers and some other factors may have caused a relatively stable population structure of B. bisignata in southern China. As the number of sampling sites increases in the future, we believe a more clear and convincing population genetic structure of B. bisignata will become evident.

Conclusions

The present study developed 11 anonymous single-copy nuclear polymorphic loci from B. bisignata using an insert-genomic library, which is critical to phylogeographic research of Blattaria. All of the markers had some level of cross-species amplification success and, furthermore, exhibited abundant variation. These anonymous markers seem to be adequate in determining the population genetic structure of B. bisignata. We have presented here the foundation of the phylogeography of B. bisignata in southern China, and a further study will be carried out with a larger number of samples from the region. These informative markers, along with other available markers, are likely to reveal a more complete picture of the evolution and dispersal patterns of cockroaches in southern China.

Fig. 2. Maximum parsimony tree of AL31 of B. bisignata based on JC substitution model. Values represent MP bootstrap values. Bootstrap values of 50% or greater are shown.

Fig. 3. Maximum parsimony tree of AL51 of B. bisignata based on Tvmef substitution model. Values represent MP bootstrap values. Bootstrap values of 50% or greater are shown.

Fig. 4. Maximum parsimony tree of AL65 of B. bisignata based on F81 substitution model. Values represent MP bootstrap values. Bootstrap values of 50% or greater are shown.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Qi-Xin He and Mr Benjamin Blanchard (Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, MI, USA) for their help on some data analyses and language. We also thank Dr Bo Xiao for the sample collection and Zhuo Chen for laboratory assistance. This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30970339) awarded to G.F. Jiang, and Nanjing Normal University Innovative Team Project (No. 0319PM0902).

Supplementary material

The online figures and tables can be viewed at http://journals.cambridge.org/ber.

References

Abdi, H. (2007) Bonferroni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. pp. 19in Salkind, N.J. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, Sage.Google Scholar
Amaral, A.R., Silva, M.C., Moeller, L.M., Beheregaray, L.B. & Coelho, M.M. (2010) Anonymous nuclear markers for cetacean species. Conservation Genetics 11, 11431146.Google Scholar
Augustinos, A.A., Asimakopoulou, A.K., Papadopoulos, N.T. & Bourtzis, K. (2011) Cross-amplified microsatellites in the European cherry fly, Rhagoletis cerasi: medium polymorphic–highly informative markers. Bulletin of Entomological Research 101, 4552.Google Scholar
Bachtrog, D., Weiss, S., Zangerl, B., Brem, G. & Schlotterer, C. (1999) Distribution of dinucleotide microsatellites in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 602610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, W., Bogdanowicz, S.M., Prodohl, P.A., Harrison, R.G., Schal, C. & Vargo, E.L. (2007) Identification and characterization of 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the German cockroach, Blattella germanica. Molecular Ecology Notes 7, 648650.Google Scholar
Booth, W., Santangelo, R.G., Vargo, E.L., Mukha, D.V. & Schal, C. (2011) Population genetic structure in German cockroaches (Blattella germanica): differentiated islands in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Heredity 102, 175183.Google Scholar
Carstens, B.C. & Knowles, L.L. (2006) Variable nuclear markers for Melanoplus oregonensis identified from the screening of a genomic library. Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 683685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, W.G. & Gemmell, N.J. (2004) Adaptive radiation within New Zealand endemic species of the cockroach genus Celatoblatta Johns (Blattidae): a response to Plio-Pleistocene mountain building and climate change. Molecular Ecology 13, 15071518.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. & Gorley, R.N. (2001) Primer v5: user manual/tutorial. Plymouth, MA, USA, Primer-E, Ltd.Google Scholar
Crissman, J.R., Booth, W., Santangelo, R.G., Mukha, D.V., Vargo, E.L. & Schal, C. (2010) Population genetic structure of the German cockroach (Blattodea: Blattellidae) in apartment buildings. Journal of Medical Entomology 47, 553564.Google Scholar
de Bruyn, M., Grail, W. & Carvalho, G.R. (2011) Anonymous nuclear markers for the Blue Panchax killifish (Aplocheilus panchax). Conservation Genetics Resources 3, 5355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamm, C.A. (2012) Development of polymorphic anonymous nuclear DNA markers for the endangered Mitchell's satyr butterfly, Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Conservation Genetics Resources 4, 127128.Google Scholar
Hare, M.P. (2001) Prospects for nuclear phylogeography. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 700706.Google Scholar
Hedrick, P.W. (2005) Genetics of Populations. Sudbury, MA, USA, Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
Henshaw, M.T., Toth, A.L. & Young, T.J. (2011) Development of new microsatellite loci for the genus Polistes from publicly available expressed sequence tag sequences. Insects Sociaux 58, 581585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R.R. & Kaplan, N.L. (1985) Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111, 147164.Google Scholar
Ji, Y.Q., Wu, D.D., Wu, G.S., Wang, G.D. & Zhang, Y.P. (2011) Multi-Locus analysis reveals a different pattern of genetic diversity for mitochondrial and nuclear DNA between wild and domestic pigs in east Asia. PLoS One 6, e26416.Google Scholar
Knowles, L.L. & Carstens, B.C. (2007) Estimating a geographically explicit model of population divergence. Evolution 61, 477493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J. & Edwards, S. (2008) Divergence across Australia's carpentarian barrier: statistical phylogeography of the redbacked fairy wren (Malurus melanocephalus). Evolution 62, 31173134.Google Scholar
Librado, P. & Rozas, J. (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 14511452.Google Scholar
Maekawa, K., Kon, M., Matsumoto, T., Kitade, O. & Araya, K. (2007) Phylogeography of the asian wood-feeding cockroach Salganea raggei Roth (Blattaria: Blaberidae) based on the mitochondrial COII gene. Oriental Insects 41, 317325.Google Scholar
Mukha, D.V., Kagramanova, A.S., Lazebnaya, I.V., Lazebnnyi, O.E., Vargo, E.L. & Schal, C. (2007) Intraspecific variation and population structure of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica, revealed with RFLP analysis of the non-transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 21, 132140.Google Scholar
Noonan, B.P. & Yoder, A.D. (2009) Anonymous nuclear markers for Malagasy plated lizards (Zonosaurus). Molecular Ecology Resources 9, 402404.Google Scholar
Posada, D. & Crandall, K. (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817818.Google Scholar
Raychoudhury, R., Grillenberger, B.K., Gadau, J., Bijlsma, R., van de Zande, L., Werren, J.H. & Beukeboom, L.W. (2010) Phylogeography of Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera) indicates a mitochondrial–Wolbachia sweep in North America. Heredity 104, 318326.Google Scholar
Rogers, A.R. (1995) Genetic evidence for a Pleistocene population explosion. Evolution 49, 608615.Google Scholar
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. & Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edn. New York, USA, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Schlotterer, C. (2000) Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA. Chromosoma 109, 365371.Google Scholar
Selkoe, K.A. & Toonen, R.J. (2006) Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecology Letters 9, 615629.Google Scholar
Sinama, M., Dubut, V., Costedoat, C., Gilles, A., Junker, M., Malausa, T., Martin, J.F., Neve, G., Pech, N., Schmitt, T., Zimmermann, M. & Meglecz, E. (2011) Challenges of microsatellite development in Lepidoptera: Euphydryas aurinia (Nymphalidae) as a case study. European Journal of Entomology 108, 262266.Google Scholar
Swofford, D.L. (2003) PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA, USA, Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Tajima, F. (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585595.Google Scholar
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28, 27312739.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 46734680.Google Scholar
Thomson, R.C., Wang, L.J. & Johnson, I.R. (2010) Genome-enabled development of DNA markers for ecology, evolution and conservation. Molecular Ecology 19, 21842195.Google Scholar
Williams, M.A.J., Dunkerley, D.L., de Deckker, P., Kershaw, A.P. & Chappel, J. (1998) Quaternary Environments. London, UK, Arnold.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sampling sites: 1, Jinghong (JH); 2, Baise (BS); 3, Mayanghe (MYH); 4, Anqing (AQ); 5, Zhenjing (ZJ). M01, Hengduan Mountain Range; M02, Phoenix Mountain.

Figure 1

Table 1. Primer sequences (5′ − 3′) for 11 anonymous nuclear loci and optimal PCR annealing temperatures (°C) cross several cockroach species.

Figure 2

Table 2. Summary data for 11 anonymous nuclear loci screened for variation in B.bisignata.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Maximum parsimony tree of AL31 of B. bisignata based on JC substitution model. Values represent MP bootstrap values. Bootstrap values of 50% or greater are shown.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Maximum parsimony tree of AL51 of B. bisignata based on Tvmef substitution model. Values represent MP bootstrap values. Bootstrap values of 50% or greater are shown.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Maximum parsimony tree of AL65 of B. bisignata based on F81 substitution model. Values represent MP bootstrap values. Bootstrap values of 50% or greater are shown.