Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T11:46:02.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wideband four-element two-segment triangular dielectric resonator antenna with monopole-like radiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

Ravi Kumar Gangwar*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India. Phone: +91-326-2235903
Pinku Ranjan
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India. Phone: +91-326-2235903
Abhishek Aigal
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India. Phone: +91-326-2235903
*
Corresponding author: R. K. Gangwar Email: ravi.gangwar.ece07@itbhu.ac.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a wideband two-segmented four-element triangular dielectric resonator antenna (TDRA) with coaxial probe feed has been proposed. The proposed antenna has been analyzed, optimized, and studied through Ansoft HFSS simulation software. The prototype of the proposed antenna has been fabricated and its input characteristics are measured with the help of R&S Vector Network Analyzer. Good agreement has been obtained between simulated and measured results. The proposed design has been compared with two segments TDRA and found wider bandwidth with lower resonant frequency. The proposed antenna provides monopole-like radiation pattern over the entire bandwidth with nearly 33% bandwidth (return loss ≥10 dB) at a resonant frequency 6.9 GHz and 4.93 dBi peak gain. The proposed antenna is suitable for application of C-band microwave frequencies.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 

I. INTRODUCTION

Dielectric resonators (DRs) act as an antenna element due to its radiation capabilities while placing into an open environment [Reference Richtinyer1]. It offers several advantages for antenna designer such as high radiation efficiency, low profile, small size, flexible feed arrangement, simple geometry structure, etc. It gives more flexibility to antenna engineers for selecting a wide range of dielectric material for antenna design [Reference Petosa2Reference Mongia4]. Triangular dielectric resonator antenna (TDRA) is more compact in size as compared with rectangular, cylindrical, and circular disc DRAs for a given height and it also covers smaller area for a given resonant frequency [Reference Lo, Leung, Luk and Yung5, Reference Lo and Leung6]. Due to its compact construction, it allows more space among DRA elements for designing an antenna array or multi-element antenna [Reference Lo, Leung, Luk and Yung5Reference Ittipiboon, Mongia, Bhartia and Cuhaci7]. Equilateral triangle has symmetry with respect to its sides as well as angles from the center of the triangle, which gives flexibility to designer for reducing mutual coupling between adjacent elements. Low-profile equilateral TDRA excited with TM 10−1 fundamental mode using very high dielectric material has been reported in [Reference Lo, Leung, Luk and Yung5].

For DRAs, enhancement of bandwidth has major design consideration for antenna designer. Some bandwidth enhancement techniques have been reported in literatures [Reference Kishk, Glisson and Zhang8Reference Petosa, Simons, Siushansian, Ittipiboon and Cuhaci12]. Some studies on DRAs are reported in the literature for monopole type radiation pattern with wide bandwidth [Reference Mongia, Ittipiboon, Bhartia and Cuhaci13Reference Chaudhary, Srivastava and Biswas22]. Guha et. al. investigated four elements cylindrical DRA and half-split hemispherical DRAs for wide bandwidth and monopole-type radiation pattern [Reference Guha and Antar14, Reference Guha and Antar15]. Similarly, four elements rectangular DRA excited with coaxial probe is described and shown wide bandwidth with monopole radiation pattern [Reference Gangwar, Singh and Kumar16]. Further, three elements, dual segments, and four elements TDRA with the monopole-like radiation pattern have been studied through simulation and experiment [Reference Gupta, Gangwar and Singh17, Reference Gangwar, Ranjan and Aigal18]. Segmented hemispherical DRAs have been investigated as monopole low-profile DRA, which shows bandwidth improvement as well as monopole in nature [Reference Guha, Gupta, Kumar and Antar19]. Wideband three and four elements multi-layer multi-permittivity cylindrical DRAs have also been investigated for monopole radiation pattern of wireless application [Reference Chaudhary, Srivastava and Biswas20Reference Chaudhary, Srivastava and Biswas22]. The design of a DRA array using disk shape with high dielectric constant material has been used to get 4.6% bandwidth at resonant frequency of 2.34 GHz, which shows that high dielectric constant materials can be used to reduce the resonant frequencies [Reference Aras, Shahrieel, Abidin, Aziz and Zulhani23, Reference Aras, Shahrieel, Aziz and Abidin24].

This paper presents the simulation and experimental studies of four elements two segment TDRA for the monopole-like radiation pattern over a wide bandwidth. Some elementary simulated results of the proposed structure have been reported by authors for the first time in [Reference Gangwar, Aigel and Ranjan25]. Proposed antenna has extension of [Reference Gangwar, Ranjan and Aigal18].The simulation study of the proposed antenna has been carried out using commercially available Ansoft HFSS simulation software. The simulated results have been compared with measured results, which show good agreement with each other. The proposed antenna produces a monopole-like radiation pattern over a wide bandwidth having a resonant frequency of 6.9 GHz. The simulated and measured return loss of the proposed antenna has been compared with the two segments TDRA and found enormous enhancement in bandwidth with lower resonant frequency.

II. ANTENNA GEOMETRY

TDRA has advantages like smaller radiation area for a given height and resonant frequency compared with other shapes like cylindrical and rectangular DRA. It provides large space between DR elements which helps antenna designers for designing antenna arrays. Thus, it helps antenna designers to introduce multi-element concept for bandwidth enhancement for efficient utilization of the radiation area.

The resonant frequency of single-element TDRA for TM mnl mode approximately has been given by [Reference Lo, Leung, Luk and Yung5, Reference Lo and Leung6].

(1) $${f_{mnl}} = \displaystyle{1 \over {2\sqrt {\varepsilon \mu}}} {\left[ {\left( {\displaystyle{4 \over {3a}}} \right)({m^2} + mn + {n^2}) + {{\left( {\displaystyle{\rho \over {2h}}} \right)}^2}} \right]^{1/2}}.$$

This can also be written as

(2) $${f_{mnl}} = \displaystyle{c \over {2\sqrt {{\varepsilon _{r,eff}}}}} {\left[ {\left( {\displaystyle{4 \over {3a}}} \right)({m^2} + mn + {n^2}) + {{\left( {\displaystyle{\rho \over {2h}}} \right)}^2}} \right]^{1/2}},$$

where c is the speed of light, ε r the dielectric constant of TDRA, a the length of each side of the TDRA, and h the height of the TDRA. The indices of resonant frequency m, n, and l satisfy the condition l + m + n = 0, but they all cannot be zero simultaneously. Here ρ = 1 for the fundamental TM 101 mode.

The resonant frequency of the two segments TDRA has been calculated for the TM 101 mode by equation (2). The effective dielectric constant (ε r, eff ) has been calculated through combining the upper segment and lower segment of the DR element by equation (3) [Reference Luk and Leung26].

(3) $${\varepsilon _{r,eff}} = \displaystyle{{{h_1} + {h_2}} \over {{h_1}/{\varepsilon _1} + {h_2}/{\varepsilon _2}}},$$

where h 1, h 2 and ε 1, ε 2 are the heights and dielectric constants of the lower and upper segments of TDRA, respectively. Here h 1 + h 2 is known as the effective height of the proposed TDRA.

The proposed four elements and two segments equilateral TDRA have been designed and fabricated, which are shown in Figs 1 and 2, respectively. Equilateral TDRA has the side dimension a = 13.34 mm. The upper segment of the two segments TDRA has dielectric constant (ε 2) = 12 (TCI Ceramics, K-12, tan δ = 2.0 × 10−4) with height h 1 = 8 mm and the lower segment is Teflon which has a dielectric constant (ε 1) = 2.08 with height h 2 = 2 mm. The proposed four elements two segments TDRA are made by combining four two-segment equilateral TDRA, which are packed together in a compact way with metallic ground plane of dimensions 50 × 50 × 3 mm3. Very small amount of adhesive material (Feviquick) has been used for combining two segments of ceramic materials, as well as the ground plane with ceramic materials. Large quantity of adhesive can create a thinner gap between two ceramic materials and between ground planes, which create small shifting in resonant frequency [Reference Aras, Shahrieel, Abidin, Aziz and Zulhani23, Reference Aras, Shahrieel, Aziz and Abidin24]. The ground plane size has been optimized through extensive simulation for minimum return loss and maximum bandwidth. As the dimension of DRA is very less compared with the ground plane size, we can assume that optimized dimension would behave like an infinite ground plane for the DRA. The elements of the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA are centrally excited by a 50 Ω coaxial probe which touches the corner edges of all the elements. From equations (1)–(3), the resonant frequency of the two segments TDRA is found to be 6.84 GHz.

Fig. 1. Two segments TDRA. (a) Schematic diagram. (b) Top view of the fabricated structure. (c) Side view of the fabricated antenna.

Fig. 2. Proposed four-element two-segment TDRA. (a) Schematic diagram. (b) Top view of the fabricated structure. (c) Side view of the fabricated antenna.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The simulation study of return loss versus frequency characteristics of the proposed antenna and two segments TDRA have been carried out using Ansoft HFSS simulation software. The proposed antenna has been fabricated and measured. The return loss versus frequency curves has been experimentally measured by Vector Network Analyzer (ROHDE & SCHWARZ-10 MHz–20 GHz.ZVM).The height of the probe above the ground plane for the proposed antenna is determined through extensive simulation to obtain minimum return loss at the corresponding resonant frequency. The simulated return loss versus frequency curve of the proposed antenna has been optimized for different probe height (l) shown in Fig. 3. From Fig. 3, it can be observed that the desired probe height of the proposed antenna is found 9 mm for minimum return loss. Similarly, the desired height of the probe is found to be 10.2 mm for the two segments TDRA. Percentage bandwidth variation with the dielectric constant of upper segment (ε r1), by keeping the dielectric constant of lower segment (Teflon, ε r2 = 2.1) constant, has been shown in Fig. 4. As it is very clear from the below Fig. 4, that the dielectric constant of upper segment (ε r1 = 12) is providing highest percentage bandwidth as compared with other dielectric constant. From Fig. 4, it can also be observed that the percentage bandwidth of the proposed antenna is decreasing by increasing the dielectric constant of the upper segment.

Fig. 3. Simulated return loss versus frequency curves of the proposed antenna for different values of probe length.

Fig. 4. Simulated percentage bandwidth versus dielectric constant of the upper segment of the DR (ε r1) curve for the proposed antenna.

The simulated and experimental return loss versus frequency curves of the proposed antenna and two segments TDRA are shown in Fig. 5. From Fig. 5, simulated and measured resonant frequency, operating frequency range and the operating bandwidth of the proposed antenna, and two segments TDRA are extracted and shown in Table 1. From Fig. 5 and Table 1, it can be observed that the proposed antenna provides wider bandwidth, which shows good agreement between simulation and measurement results. The proposed four-element two-segment TDRA has higher bandwidth compared with two segments TDRA due to more radiation surface area. It can also be depicted from Fig. 5 and Table 1, that there are little differences between resonant frequencies of the proposed and two segments TDRA. The difference in results comes due to its fabrication complication like improper alignment and effect of binding reagent (adhesive material), etc. Table 2 shows comparison between other published DRAs. From Table 2, it can be observed that the proposed antenna has better performance in comparison with other published DRAs. The proposed antenna also provides wider bandwidth (2300 MHz) as compared with four elements TDRA [Reference Gangwar, Ranjan and Aigal18], as it takes the same radiation area and gives wider bandwidth which leads to its importance. Owing to two segments, the effective dielectric constant of the two segments TDRA is being reduced and due to which improvement in bandwidth has been observed.

Fig. 5. Comparison of the simulated and measured return loss of the proposed antenna and two segments TDRA.

Table 1. Resonant frequency and return loss performance of the proposed antenna and two-segment TDRA.

Table 2. Comparison of the proposed antenna with similar structures.

Bold signifies present paper result.

The input impedance versus frequency characteristic of the proposed antenna has been investigated using Ansoft HFSS simulation software. The input impedance of the proposed antenna has also been measured with the help of Vector Network Analyzer (VNA (ROHDE & SCHWARZ-10 MHz–20 GHz.ZVM)).The simulated and measured input impedance versus frequency curve for the proposed antenna is shown in Fig. 6. Its numerical values of real part of input impedance has been extracted from Fig. 6 and found to be 50.5 and 50.25 Ω, respectively, at resonant frequency. The input impedance at resonant frequency is very close to 50 Ω impedance of the coaxial probe feed, which shows good impedance match. It is also observed that simulated input impedance has good agreement with measured result.

Fig. 6. Variation of simulated input impedance versus frequency of the proposed antenna.

The simulation study of the near-field distribution of the proposed TDRA has been carried out at the resonant frequency using the Ansoft HFSS software. The distinct electric and magnetic field distributions for the proposed TDRA are shown in Fig. 7. It is apparent from Fig. 7 that the coaxial probe excites TM 10−1 dominant mode fields in the antenna elements and also the electric field components face their counter vectors, thus no radiation is emitted along the broadside direction [Reference Gangwar, Singh and Kumar16]. The resultant electric field is polarized along the z-direction and thus it leads to a vertically polarized radiation surrounding the radiating structure like a quarter wave electric monopole [Reference Gangwar, Ranjan and Aigal18].

Fig. 7. Near-field distribution in the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA, (a) E-field and (b) H-field.

The far-field patterns of the proposed antenna at resonant frequency 6.9 GHz are studied through Ansoft HFSS simulation software and compared with measured one. The far-field measurement of the proposed antenna has been taken place inside anechoic chamber. The simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna in the E- and H-planes at resonant frequency are shown in Figs 8(a) and 8(b), respectively. The radiation patterns of the proposed antenna have also been measured at 7.2 and 5.9 GHz, which are shown in Figs 9 and 10, respectively. From the radiation patterns of the proposed antenna, it can be observed that the radiation pattern of the proposed antenna is omni-directional in the H-plane and monopole-like radiation pattern in the E-plane. No radiation along the broadside direction of the proposed DRA is in conformity with the counteracting E-field distributions within the elements of the proposed TDRA [Reference Lo, Leung, Luk and Yung5]. The proposed antenna shows very low cross-polarization level in both the E- and H-planes. The simulated radiation efficiency and peak directivity of the proposed antenna is found 99% and 5.1 dBi, respectively. Simulated and measured gain versus frequency curves of the proposed antenna has been shown in Fig. 11. From Fig. 11, it can be observed that the gain is linear in operational bandwidth with an average value of nearly 4.93 dBi. It can also be observed that the simulated gain results are in good agreement with measured gain results. For the measured gain calculation three antenna method has been used [Reference Balanis27].

Fig. 8. Radiation pattern of the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA in the (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane at 6.9 GHz frequency.

Fig. 9. Radiation pattern of the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA in the (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane at 7.2 GHz frequency.

Fig. 10. Radiation pattern of the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA in the (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane at 5.9 GHz frequency.

Fig. 11. Gain versus frequency variation of the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA.

IV. CONCLUSION

A wideband four-element two-segmented TDRA has been designed through simulation using Ansoft HFSS simulation software. The proposed antenna has been fabricated and tested. The proposed antenna has been compared with the same dimension of two segment TDRA, and found bandwidth enhancement (≈11.00%) with lower resonant frequency. From the study, it is inferred that the bandwidth of the proposed antenna has been found nearly 33% and provide a monopole type of radiation pattern with nearly 4.93 dBi gain in complete operating frequency band. The results obtained may be useful for designing and developing antennas for subsurface communication, geophysical exploration, biomedical telemetry, and for mobile terrestrial and aerospace communication systems for C-band frequency application.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The first author, Ravi Kumar Gangwar wishes to acknowledge the TEQIP-II Project, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India for awarding financial aid. Authors also would like to acknowledge Professor Dharmendra Singh, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, IIT Roorkee, India, for his guidance and also for providing antenna measurement facility at IIT Roorkee.

Ravi Kumar Gangwar was born in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India, in 1983. He received his B. Tech. degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from U.P. Technical University, Lucknow, India, in 2006, and Ph.D. degree in Electronics Engineering in 2011 from the Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University (IIT-BHU), Varanasi, India. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad. He served as the senior research fellow/junior research fellow in the Department of Electronics Engineering, IIT-BHU during 2007–2011. He has authored or coauthored over 48 research papers in international/national journals and conference proceedings. His research interest includes dielectric resonator antenna, metamaterial, and bio-electromagnetics. He is a member of IEEE APS Society. He is a reviewer of PIER, International Journal of Electronics, International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technology, Wireless Personnel Communication international journals.

Pinku Ranjan born in Nalanda, Bihar, India, in 1988. He received his B. Tech. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU) Hyderabad, India, in 2010. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. as senior research fellow in the Department of Electronics Engineering from Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India. He served as a junior research fellow in the Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India, during 2012–2014. He has authored or co-authored for more than six research papers in international/national journals and conference proceedings. His research interests include dielectric resonator antenna and bio-electromagnetics. He is a student member of IEEE society.

Abhishek Aigal obtained his Bachelor of Technology degree from Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad in Electronics and Communications Engineering, where he worked in the fields of Algorithms, Wireless Technology, and Antenna. His current interests focus on algorithms and data structures. He is currently employed at Ericsson.

References

REFERENCES

[1] Richtinyer, R.D.: Dielectric resonators. J. Appl. Phys., 10 (1939), 391398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Petosa, A.: Dielectric Resonator Antenna Handbook, Artech house, Boston, UK, 2007.Google Scholar
[3] Mongia, R.K.; Ittipiboon, A.: Theoretical and experimental investigations on rectangular dielectric resonator antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 45 (1997), 13481356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Mongia, R.K.: Theoretical and experimental resonance frequencies of rectangular dielectric resonators. IEEE Proc. H, 139 (1992), 98104.Google Scholar
[5] Lo, H.Y.; Leung, K.W.; Luk, K.M.; Yung, E.K.N.: Low profile equilateral-triangular dielectric resonator antenna of very high permittivity. Electron. Lett., 35 (1999), 21642166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Lo, H.Y.; Leung, K.W.: Excitation of low profile equilateral-triangular dielectric resonator antenna using a conductive conformal strip. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., 29 (2001), 317319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Ittipiboon, A.; Mongia, R.K.; Bhartia, P.; Cuhaci, M.: Aperture fed rectangular and triangular dielectric resonators for use as magnetic dipole antennas. Electron. Lett., 29 (1993), 20012002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Kishk, A.A.; Glisson, A.W.; Zhang, X.: Analysis of a dielectric resonator antenna for wideband applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 50 (2002), 469474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Kishk, A.A.; Glisson, A.W.: Bandwidth enhancement for split cylindrical dielectric resonator antennas. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 33 (2001), 97118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Shum, S.M.; Luk, K.M.: Stacked annular ring dielectric resonator antenna excited by axi-symmetric coaxial probe. IEEE Trans. Antenna Propag., 43 (1995), 889892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Junker, G.P.; Kishk, A.A.; Glisson, A.W.; Kajfez, D.: Effect of air-gap on cylindrical dielectric resonator antenna operating in TM01 mode. Electron. Lett., 30 (1994), 9798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Petosa, A.; Simons, N.; Siushansian, R.; Ittipiboon, A.; Cuhaci, M.: Design and analysis of multisegment dielectric resonator antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 48 (2000), 738742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Mongia, R.K.; Ittipiboon, A.; Bhartia, P.; Cuhaci, M.: Electric monopole antenna using a dielectric ring resonator. Electron. Lett., 29 (1993), 15301531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Guha, D.; Antar, Y.M.M.: Four-element cylindrical dielectric resonator antenna for wideband monopole-like radiation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 54 (2006), 26572662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Guha, D.; Antar, Y.M.M.: New half-hemispherical dielectric resonator antenna for broadband monopole-type radiation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 54 (2006), 36213628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Gangwar, R.K.; Singh, S.P.; Kumar, D.: Four element wideband rectangular dielectric resonator antenna terminated in bio-medium. Wireless Pers. Commun.: an Int. J., 73 (2013), 663677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Gupta, A.; Gangwar, R.K.; Singh, S.P.: Three element dual segment triangular dielectric resonator antenna for x-band application. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 34 (2013), 139150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Gangwar, R.K.; Ranjan, P.; Aigal, A.: Four element triangular dielectric resonator antenna for wireless application. Int. J. Microw. Wireless Technol., (2015), doi: 10.1017/S1759078715000860.Google Scholar
[19] Guha, D.; Gupta, B.; Kumar, C.; Antar, M.M.: Segmented hemispherical DRA: new geometry characterized and investigated in multi-element composite forms for wideband antenna applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 60 (2012), 16051610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Chaudhary, R.K.; Srivastava, K.V.; Biswas, A.: Broadband four-element multi-layer multi-permittivity cylindrical dielectric resonator antenna. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., 55 (2013), 932937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Chaudhary, R.K.; Srivastava, K.V.; Biswas, A.: Wideband multilayer multi-permittivity half-split cylindrical dielectric resonator antenna. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., 54 (2012), 25872590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Chaudhary, R.K.; Srivastava, K.V.; Biswas, A.: Three-element multilayer multipermittivity cylindrical dielectric resonator antenna for Wideband multilayer multi-permittivity half-split cylindrical dielectric resonator antenna. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., 54 (2012), 20112016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Aras, M.; Shahrieel, M.; Abidin, M.Z.; Aziz, A.; Zulhani, R.: An array of dielectric resonator antenna for wireless application, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. RF Microwave, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2–4 December 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Aras, M.; Shahrieel, M.; Aziz, A.; Abidin, M.Z.: Dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) for wireless application, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. RF Microwave, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2–4 December 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Gangwar, R.K.; Aigel, A.; Ranjan, P.: Four element dual segment triangular dielectric resonator antenna for wideband application, antenna testing and measurement society (ATMS), Chennai, India, February 2014.Google Scholar
[26] Luk, K.M.; Leung, K.W.: Dielectric Resonator Antennas, Research Studies Press Ltd., Baldock, Hertfordshire, England.Google Scholar
[27] Balanis, C.A.: Antenna Theory and Design, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, NY. Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Two segments TDRA. (a) Schematic diagram. (b) Top view of the fabricated structure. (c) Side view of the fabricated antenna.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Proposed four-element two-segment TDRA. (a) Schematic diagram. (b) Top view of the fabricated structure. (c) Side view of the fabricated antenna.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Simulated return loss versus frequency curves of the proposed antenna for different values of probe length.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Simulated percentage bandwidth versus dielectric constant of the upper segment of the DR (εr1) curve for the proposed antenna.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Comparison of the simulated and measured return loss of the proposed antenna and two segments TDRA.

Figure 5

Table 1. Resonant frequency and return loss performance of the proposed antenna and two-segment TDRA.

Figure 6

Table 2. Comparison of the proposed antenna with similar structures.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Variation of simulated input impedance versus frequency of the proposed antenna.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Near-field distribution in the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA, (a) E-field and (b) H-field.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Radiation pattern of the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA in the (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane at 6.9 GHz frequency.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Radiation pattern of the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA in the (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane at 7.2 GHz frequency.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Radiation pattern of the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA in the (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane at 5.9 GHz frequency.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Gain versus frequency variation of the proposed four-element two-segment TDRA.