Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:46:23.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Significance of free radical injury in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

M K Manjunath*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT – Head and Neck Surgery, Sree Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur, Karnataka, India
V Annam
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Sree Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur, Karnataka, India
D R Suresh
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Sree Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur, Karnataka, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr M K Manjunath, Assistant Professor, Department of ENT – Head and Neck Surgery, Sree Siddhartha Medical College, BH Road, Agalakote, Tumkur, Karnataka, India572107. E-mail: drmanjumk@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background and objectives:

Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer is a multifactorial disease caused by various carcinogens such as tobacco, alcohol and viruses. Likewise, oxidative stress is known to cause aberrations in the cell membrane and DNA, leading to cancer. We conducted this prospective study in order to evaluate the level of oxidative stress in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer patients.

Methods:

Fifty patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer and 40 control subjects were selected. Serum malondialdehyde concentrations and ferric reducing antioxidant power were assessed, in order to evaluate oxidative stress. Results were analysed by Student's t-test.

Results:

Malondialdehyde levels were significantly higher and ferric reducing antioxidant power lower in the cancer patients, compared with the controls, indicating higher oxidative stress in the former. There was no statistically significant difference in malondialdehyde concentration or ferric reducing antioxidant power, comparing patients with versus without neck secondaries, and patients with early stage versus late stage tumours.

Conclusion:

Oxidative stress may have a role to play in the initiation of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers, especially in patients with other risk factors such as tobacco and alcohol use.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Introduction

Malignancies of the larynx and the hypopharynx are among the commonest cancers affecting humanity, and contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of those afflicted. It has now been proven that these cancers have a genetic component, with DNA mutations being the primary initiating event.Reference Loyo and Pai1 Such mutations can be caused by tobacco, alcohol, certain viruses, and a diet lacking micronutrients and antioxidants. Antioxidants are required to neutralise the harmful effects of free oxygen radicals, which are capable of altering cell homeostasis.

Many studies have demonstrated an association between oxygen free radicals and various cancers.Reference Dwivedi, Raturi, Kandpal, Dwivedi, Singh and Puri2Reference Brown and Bicknell5 However, there are limited studies investigating the relationship between laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers and, firstly, increased free radicals, and, secondly, decreased total antioxidant capacity.

In this study, we attempted to evaluate the relationship between these reactive oxygen species and laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies. We hoped that this research might improve understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases, reveal new therapeutic possibilities, and contribute to a reduction in the incidence of such illness. Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies were investigated together, as they share a common anatomical site and behave similarly with respect to aetiology, clinical features and local spread.

Materials and methods

All patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal malignancies attending the ENT out-patient department at a tertiary care centre were included in the study, regardless of their operative feasibility.

The project was approved by the medical college ethics committee.

Our study group comprised 50 patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal malignancy, confirmed by direct laryngoscopy and biopsy with histopathological examination. A control group of 40 subjects was selected from individuals aged over 40 years with a history of smoking, who were free of malignancy. Patients with other malignancies or concurrent illness known independently to increase oxidative stress (e.g. diabetes or heart disease) were excluded from the study. All patients were classified by tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) staging, according to the cancer staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer.Reference Greene, Page, Fleming, Fritz, Balch and Haller6

Under strict, aseptic conditions, venous blood was drawn from each patient and centrifuged at 1500 rpm to separate the serum. Lipid peroxidation was assessed by measuring serum malondialdehyde concentration, according to the colorimetric method of Satoh.Reference Satoh7 Total antioxidant capacity was measured by serum ferric reducing antioxidant power assay, according to the method of Benzie and Strain.Reference Benzie and Strain8

Results were expressed as mean±standard deviation. Patients' results were compared with those of controls. Results were also compared for patients with versus without nodal metastasis, and for patients with early stage (i.e. T1 or T2) versus late stage (i.e. T3 or T4) tumours, as these are the major factors determining survival.Reference Watkinson, Gaze and Wilson9 Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test. Statistical significance was set at a p value of <0.05.

Results

The study included 50 patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer (mean age 55 years) and 40 control subjects (mean age 52 years). All the study patients abused tobacco in some form (the women chewed tobacco while the men smoked it). Thirty-two study patients also abused alcohol. The control subjects used tobacco in a similar fashion. All patients and controls were from a low socioeconomic background, lived in rural areas, and had very little knowledge of the importance of diet in health.

Control subjects had a mean malondialdehyde concentration of 0.965 nmol/ml with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.208 (95 per cent confidence interval (CI) = 0.898 to 1.032), while study patients had a mean malondialdehyde concentration of 3.584 nmol/ml with a SD of 1.941 (95 per cent CI = 3.032 to 4.136); this level was approximately three times greater.

Controls had a mean ferric reducing antioxidant power of 1069 µmol/l with a SD of 143.88 (95 per cent CI = 1022.984 to 1115.015), while study patients had a mean ferric reducing antioxidant power of 526.8 µmol/l with a SD of 112.117 (95 per cent CI = 494.937 to 558.663); this level was approximately halved, that of controls (Table I).

Table I Malondialdehyde and ferric reducing antioxidant power in controls and patients

MDA = malondialdehyde; FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant power; pts = patients; SD = standard deviation; SEM = standard error of the mean

There was no statistically significant difference in the mean malondialdehyde concentration or ferric reducing antioxidant power of patients with versus without nodal metastasis (p > 0.5) (Table II). Likewise, there was no statistically significant difference in either of these two parameters for patients with early stage versus advanced tumours (Table III).

Table II Malondialdehyde and ferric reducing antioxidant power in patients with and without nodal metastases

MDA = malondialdehyde; FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant power; N0 = no nodal metastases; N1 = nodal metastases; SD = standard deviation; SEM = standard error of the mean

Table III Malondialdehyde and ferric reducing antioxidant power in patients with early and late stage tumours

MDA = malondialdehyde; FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant power; early = tumour (T) stage T1 or T2; late = T3 or T4; SD = standard deviation; SEM = standard error of the mean

Discussion

All mammals produce oxygen radicals as part of the oxidative phosphorylation process within mitochondria. These oxygen radicals, also known as reactive oxygen species, are powerful oxidising agents and induce lipid peroxidation, leading to loss of cell homeostasis through modification of the structure and functions of the cell membrane. Most importantly, lipid peroxidation results in significant damage to DNA.Reference Abidi and Ali10, Reference Van-Ginkel and Sevanian11 This DNA damage can cause mutations that can initiate tumour formation and progression.Reference Wiseman and Halliwell12, Reference Suresh, Silvia and Agarwal13

In order to neutralise the deleterious effects of reactive oxygen species, mammalian cells possess elaborate antioxidant defence mechanisms.Reference Klaunig, Xu, Isenberg, Bachowski, Kolaja and Jiang14, Reference Barber and Harris15 These antioxidant mechanisms are present in the extracellular fluids, and may be from endogenous or exogenous sources; together, they are referred to as the total antioxidant capacity.

Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance between reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defence mechanisms. There is extensive evidence of an association between oxidative stress and many cancers, such as breast cancer. In order to counteract these reactive oxygen species, individuals should consume at least five portions of fruit or vegetables each day.Reference Brown and Bicknell5

Oxidative stress is assessed in biological samples by monitoring malondialdehyde concentration, a measure of lipid peroxidation.Reference Llesuy, Evelson, Campos and Lissi16, Reference McCall and Frei17 Ferric reducing antioxidant power has been reported as a novel indicator of total antioxidant capacity, and is considered a useful measure of the body's ability to regulate the damage caused by reactive oxygen species.Reference Pstova, Zahalkova, Hrbac, Simanek and Bartek18

In the current study, we found that cancer patients' malondialdehyde concentrations were approximately three times greater, and their ferric reducing antioxidant power was approximately halved, compared with controls. Similar results were obtained by Dwivedi et al. Reference Dwivedi, Raturi, Kandpal, Dwivedi, Singh and Puri2 This indicates that oxidative stress may be involved in the development of these cancers.

  • Oxidative stress influences the initiation of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies in patients with other risk factors such as smoking and alcohol

  • This study assessed serum malondialdehyde concentration and ferric reducing antioxidant power to evaluate oxidative stress

  • The role of oxidative stress in the initiation and progression of these cancers needs to be evaluated by larger cohort studies and animal models

However, we found no statistically significant difference in malondialdehyde concentration or ferric reducing antioxidant power, comparing patients with and without nodal metastasis. There were also no differences in either of these two parameters, comparing patients with early and late stage tumours (i.e. T1 or T2 versus T3 or T4). This may be because further progression of the cancer was independent of oxidative stress. This may also be due to the smaller sample size in our study.

Conclusion

Oxidative stress influences the initiation of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies in patients with other, well proven risk factors such as smoking and alcohol. However, the role of oxidative stress in the initiation and progression of these cancers needs to be evaluated using larger cohort studies and animal models. In addition, the role of oxidative stress in later stage tumour progression and tumour metastasis requires further evaluation. Better understanding of these interactions will help us to further establish the importance of dietary antioxidant factors in cancer protection.

References

1Loyo, M, Pai, SI. The molecular genetics of laryngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2008;41:657–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Dwivedi, RC, Raturi, DP, Kandpal, N, Dwivedi, RC, Singh, RP, Puri, VN. Oxidative stress in patients with laryngeal carcinoma. Indian J Cancer 2008;45:97–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Caliskan-Can, E, Firat, H, Ardic, S, Bolkan, S, Torun, M, Yardin-Akaydin, S. Increased levels of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and its relationship with lipid peroxidation and antioxidant vitamins in lung cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:107–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Ernst, P. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 1999;13:1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Brown, NS, Bicknell, R. Hypoxia and oxidative stress in breast cancer: oxidative stress – its effects on the growth, metastatic potential and response to therapy of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2001;3:323–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Greene, FL, Page, DL, Fleming, ID, Fritz, AG, Balch, CM, Haller, DG, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn.New York: Springer, 2002;1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Satoh, K. Serum lipid peroxide in cerebrovascular disorders determined by a new colorimetric method. Clinica Chemica Acta 1978;90:3743Google ScholarPubMed
8Benzie, IF, Strain, JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: the FRAP assay. Analytical Biochemistry 1996;239:70–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Watkinson, JC, Gaze, MN, Wilson, JA, eds. Tumours of the larynx. In: Stell and Maran's Head and Neck Surgery, 4th edn.Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000;233–74Google Scholar
10Abidi, S, Ali, A. Role of oxygen free radicals in the pathogenesis and etiology of cancer. Cancer Lett 1999;142:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Van-Ginkel, G, Sevanian, A. Lipid peroxidation-induced membrane structural alterations. Methods Enzymol 1994;233:273–88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Wiseman, H, Halliwell, B. Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer. Biochem J 1996;313:1729CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Suresh, DR, Silvia, WD, Agarwal, R. Lipid peroxidation and total antioxidant capacity in patients with chronic renal failure. Asian J Biochem 2008;3:315–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Klaunig, JE, Xu, Y, Isenberg, JS, Bachowski, S, Kolaja, KL, Jiang, J et al. The role of oxidative stress in chemical carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect 1998;106:289–95Google ScholarPubMed
15Barber, DA, Harris, SR. Oxygen free radicals and antioxidants: a review. Am Pharm 1994;34:2635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Llesuy, S, Evelson, P, Campos, AM, Lissi, E. Methodologies for evaluation of total antioxidant activities in complex mixtures: a critical review. Biol Res 2001;34:5173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17McCall, MR, Frei, B. Can antioxidant vitamins materially reduce oxidative damage in humans? Free Radical Biol Med 1999;26:1034–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Pstova, J, Zahalkova, J, Hrbac, J, Simanek, V, Bartek, JJ. Determination of total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in plasma by cyclic voltammetry. Biomed Pap 2001;145:81–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table I Malondialdehyde and ferric reducing antioxidant power in controls and patients

Figure 1

Table II Malondialdehyde and ferric reducing antioxidant power in patients with and without nodal metastases

Figure 2

Table III Malondialdehyde and ferric reducing antioxidant power in patients with early and late stage tumours