Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T22:41:11.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seed germination ecology of meadow knapweed (Centaurea × moncktonii) populations in New York State, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Antonio DiTommaso*
Affiliation:
Professor, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Lindsey R. Milbrath
Affiliation:
Research Entomologist, USDA-ARS, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, NY, USA
Caroline A. Marschner
Affiliation:
Research Technician, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Scott H. Morris
Affiliation:
Research Technician, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Anna S. Westbrook
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Antonio DiTommaso, 903 Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853. (E-mail: ad97@cornell.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The introduced meadow knapweed (Centaurea × moncktonii C.E. Britton), a hybrid of black (Centaurea nigra L.) and brown (Centaurea jacea L.) knapweeds, is increasingly common in pastures, meadows, and waste areas across many U.S. states, including New York. We evaluated the effects of temperature, light, seed stratification, scarification, and population on percent germination in four experiments over 2 yr. Percent germination ranged from 3% to 100% across treatment combinations. Higher temperatures (30:20, 25:15, and sometimes 20:10 C day:night regimes compared with 15:5 C) promoted germination, especially when combined with the stimulatory effect of light (14:10 h L:D compared with continuous darkness). Under the three lowest temperature treatments, light increased percent germination by 15% to 86%. Cold-wet seed stratification also increased germination rates, especially at lower germination temperatures, but was not a prerequisite for germination. Scarification did not increase percent germination. Differences between C. × moncktonii populations were generally less significant than differences between temperature, light, and stratification treatments. Taken together, these results indicate that C. × moncktonii is capable of germinating under a broad range of environments, which may have facilitated this species’ range expansion in recent decades. However, C. × moncktonii also shows evidence of germination polymorphism: some seeds will germinate under suboptimal conditions, while others may remain dormant until the abiotic environment improves. Subtle differences in dormancy mechanisms and their relative frequencies may affect phenological traits like the timing of seedling emergence and ultimately shape the sizes and ranges of C. × moncktonii populations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Introduction

Mechanisms governing seed dormancy and germination exert powerful influences over the population dynamics of plant species. By limiting when and where seeds can germinate, dormancy helps regulate seed and seedling mortality rates, population densities, and species ranges (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2014; Fenner and Thompson Reference Fenner and Thompson2005). Dormancy status may be affected by environmental factors such as temperature, moisture, or light; the passage of time (e.g., afterripening); damage to the seed coat (e.g., scarification); and/or by plant hormones, including abscisic acid and gibberellins (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2014; Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger Reference Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger2006; Kucera et al. Reference Kucera, Cohn and Leubner-Metzger2005). All dormancy mechanisms reflect selective pressure to discourage germination under (or immediately before) unfavorable conditions without preventing germination altogether. Optimal solutions to this trade-off depend on species and environment, which jointly dictate whether seeds germinate quasi-simultaneously or continuously across the growing season (Newman Reference Newman1963; Salisbury Reference Salisbury1929; Young et al. Reference Young, Evans and Eckert1969). Species exhibiting simultaneous germination may achieve more emergence before competitors, which can provide a significant advantage to weeds and invasive herbaceous species (Radosevich et al. Reference Radosevich, Holt and Ghersa2007; Zimdahl Reference Zimdahl2007). In contrast, species exhibiting continuous germination forfeit some favorable sites early in the growing season for the sake of insurance against catastrophic seedling losses due to weather or other unpredictable events (Newman Reference Newman1963; Salisbury Reference Salisbury1929). Some species combine simultaneous and continuous germination strategies (Clements et al. Reference Clements, Harmon and Young2010; Newman Reference Newman1963; Young et al. Reference Young, Evans and Eckert1969), either by permitting simultaneous germination only in ideal conditions or by producing seeds with variable requirements for the release of primary dormancy. The latter tendency is known as germination polymorphism (Bewley and Black Reference Bewley and Black1982; Clements et al. Reference Clements, Harmon and Young2010).

Centaurea is a large genus of thistle-like plants in the family Asteraceae distinguished by its complicated internal taxonomy and the invasiveness of many representatives (DiTomaso Reference DiTomaso2000; Garcia-Jacas et al. Reference Garcia-Jacas, Uysal, Romashchenko, Suárez-Santiago, Ertuğrul and Susanna2006; Keil and Ochsmann Reference Keil and Ochsmann2006). Most Centaurea species in the United States are introduced (USDA-NRCS 2020) and many arrived from Eurasia in the late 1800s or early 1900s (Roché and Roché Reference Roché and Roché1988, Reference Roché and Roché1991). There are now at least 32 species present in the United States, at least 11 of which are classified as noxious weeds in at least one state (USDA-NRCS 2020). Chemical and biological approaches to management have sometimes been successful (Harris and Cranston Reference Harris and Cranston1979; Miller and Lucero Reference Miller and Lucero2014; Sheley et al. Reference Sheley, Jacobs and Carpinelli1998; Winston et al. Reference Winston, Schwarzlander, Randall and Peardon2012). However, management remains difficult because multiple traits may underlie invasiveness in these species, including allelopathy (Fletcher and Renney Reference Fletcher and Renney1963), tolerance of diverse environmental conditions (Keil and Ochsmann Reference Keil and Ochsmann2006; Qaderi et al. Reference Qaderi, Lynch, Godin and Reid2013; USDA-NRCS 2020), and abundant seed production (Schirman Reference Schirman1981; Watson and Renney Reference Watson and Renney1974).

Traits related to dormancy and germination vary among and within Centaurea species in North America. In yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.), diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa Lam.), and spotted knapweed [Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek, often reported as Centaurea maculosa Lam.], exposure to red light following darkness can stimulate germination, and far-red light can reverse the effect (Joley et al. Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003; Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988). White light was also shown to stimulate germination in C. solstitialis (Joley et al. Reference Joley, Schoenig, Casanave, Maddox and Mackey1997, Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003). However, Watson and Renney (Reference Watson and Renney1974) found that continuous light reduced germination rates in C. diffusa and C. stoebe, while a 12:12 L:D cycle was nearly indistinguishable from continuous darkness. The discrepancy could reflect the weakening of primary dormancy under warm, dry conditions (afterripening) in these species (Eddleman and Romo Reference Eddleman and Romo1988; Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988). Cool-moist stratification further weakened dormancy in C. stoebe (Eddleman and Romo Reference Eddleman and Romo1988), while cool temperatures followed by drying induced secondary dormancy in C. solstitialis (Joley et al. Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003).

Centaurea seeds are capable of germinating in a variety of environments. Centaurea diffusa, C. solstitialis, and purple starthistle (Centaurea calcitrapa L.) have germinated under temperatures ranging from 0 to 40 C, especially under alternating cold–warm temperature regimes (Clements et al. Reference Clements, Harmon and Young2010; Pitcairn et al. Reference Pitcairn, Young, Clements and Balciunas2002; Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005). In these species, germination rates may be optimized under periods of 15 to 25 C alternating with 2 to 15 C (Clements et al. Reference Clements, Harmon and Young2010; Joley et al. Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003; Pitcairn et al. Reference Pitcairn, Young, Clements and Balciunas2002; Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005). Moisture levels may also limit germination in Centaurea species (Eddleman and Romo Reference Eddleman and Romo1988; Larson and Kiemnec Reference Larson and Kiemnec1997; Spears et al. Reference Spears, Rose and Belles1980; Watson and Renney Reference Watson and Renney1974). There are several reports of intraspecific variation in germination requirements, including variation in temperature optima across accessions of C. solstitialis (Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005) and the coexistence of nondormant seeds, seeds with primary dormancy released by light, and dormant seeds insensitive to light on individual plants of C. diffusa and C. stoebe (Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988).

Meadow knapweed (Centaurea × moncktonii C.E. Britton = Centaurea debeauxii Godr. & Gren. ssp. thuillieri Dostál, Centaurea jacea L. var. pratensis W.D.J. Koch) is a hybrid of black (Centaurea nigra L.) and brown (Centaurea jacea L.) knapweeds, although Vochin knapweed (Centaurea nigrescens Willd.) may also contribute to the hybrid swarm in North America (Keil and Ochsmann Reference Keil and Ochsmann2006). It was likely introduced directly from Europe in the late 1800s (Roché and Roché Reference Roché and Roché1991). This theory is consistent with the deep introgression reported in North American C. × moncktonii populations, although more recent hybridization in North America is also possible (Lachmuth et al. Reference Lachmuth, Molofsky, Milbrath, Suda and Keller2019). Like its parental species, C. × moncktonii is a self-incompatible perennial that flowers between May and November (Hardy et al. Reference Hardy, de Loose, Vekemans and Meerts2001; Keil and Ochsmann Reference Keil and Ochsmann2006). It exhibits a preference for wetter environments (Roché and Roché Reference Roché and Roché1991). Seed dispersal occurs by wind over short distances and primarily by humans over long distances (Roché and Roché Reference Roché and Roché1991; Soons and Heil Reference Soons and Heil2002).

Although C. × moncktonii was introduced to the United States more than a century ago, it has presented increasingly serious management problems in recent decades. It has now been reported in more than 20 states and is considered a noxious weed in the Pacific Northwest (Kartesz Reference Kartesz2014; Keil and Ochsmann Reference Keil and Ochsmann2006; Winston et al. Reference Winston, Schwarzlander, Randall and Peardon2012). In New York, C. × moncktonii is becoming increasingly common in moist pastures, meadows, and waste areas (Eckel Reference Eckel2012; Weldy et al. Reference Weldy, Werier and Nelson2020). The ongoing development of best management practices (Miller and Lucero Reference Miller and Lucero2014; Thorpe et al. Reference Thorpe, Massatti and Giles2009; Winston et al. Reference Winston, Schwarzlander, Randall and Peardon2012) may be aided by a better understanding of this invasive hybrid. Because C. × moncktonii is biologically and ecologically distinct from its parental species (Keil and Ochsmann Reference Keil and Ochsmann2006; Roché and Roché Reference Roché and Roché1991; Winston et al. Reference Winston, Schwarzlander, Randall and Peardon2012), with evidence of transgressive segregation in some traits (Lachmuth et al. Reference Lachmuth, Molofsky, Milbrath, Suda and Keller2019), research efforts should be specific to C. × moncktonii. One important topic is germination, which is not well understood in either the hybrid or the parental species. Centaurea × moncktonii seeds usually germinate in the spring, but autumn germination can also occur (Milbrath and Biazzo Reference Milbrath and Biazzo2020; Winston et al. Reference Winston, Schwarzlander, Randall and Peardon2012). Autumn germination also occurs in other Centaurea species (Lesica and Shelly Reference Lesica and Shelly1996; Roché et al. Reference Roché, Thill and Shafii1997; Watson and Renney Reference Watson and Renney1974), including C. jacea (Kahmen and Poschlod Reference Kahmen and Poschlod2008). After observing high rates of autumn seedling emergence in field-placed seed pans (Milbrath and Biazzo Reference Milbrath and Biazzo2020), we designed the present study to explore factors influencing seed germination in C. × moncktonii. We evaluated the effects of temperature, light, cold-wet stratification, scarification, and C. × moncktonii population on seed germinability. Based on the published germination requirements of other Centaurea, which often involve temperature and light, rarely include stratification or scarification, and can be similar between species, we developed five hypotheses:

  1. 1. Centaurea × moncktonii seed germination rates will be greatest at moderate temperatures.

  2. 2. More seeds will germinate in alternating light conditions than constant darkness.

  3. 3. Seed germination rates will not vary between populations.

  4. 4. Cold-wet stratification will not affect germination rates.

  5. 5. Scarification will not affect germination rates.

Materials and Methods

Seed Collection

Mature capitula were collected in August 2015 for Experiments 1–3 from four sites in central and eastern New York State and in August 2016 for Experiment 4 from one of the previous sites in central New York State (Table 1). The Jacobson site (private property; 42.4981°N, 76.2475°W) in Cortland County is a little-used hayfield on Erie silt loam soil (fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Fragiaquepts). McLean Meadow (Cornell Botanic Gardens; 42.5453°N, 76.2681°W) in Tompkins County is a formerly abandoned pasture on Howard (loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Glossic Hapludalfs) and Palmyra (fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Glossic Hapludalfs) soils that is mowed every few years to maintain it as a meadow. The Finger Lakes National Forest site (FLNF, USDA Forest Service; 42.5283°N, 76.7764°W) in Schuyler County is a periodically mowed pasture on Erie silt loam soil. The Fort Plain site (private property; 42.9003°N, 74.7458°W) in Montgomery County in eastern New York, on Hornell silt loam soil (fine, illitic, acid, mesic Aeric Endoaquepts), has been in hay production or grass fallow for many years. All sites had extensive populations of C. × moncktonii that have been present for at least 10 yr (Milbrath and Biazzo Reference Milbrath and Biazzo2020).

Table 1. Seed handling and treatments for four germination experiments on Centaurea × moncktonii seeds collected in New York State (n = 5 per treatment combination).

a FLNF, Finger Lakes National Forest.

Capitula were stored in paper bags at room temperature for 4 to 6 wk before cleaning. A rubbing board was used to separate the seeds from the dried capitula, potentially scarifying the seeds, and chaff was removed by sieving followed by a seed blower (General Seed Blower, New Brunswick General Sheet Metal Works, New Brunswick, NJ). For the non-scarified treatment in Experiment 4 (Table 1), seeds were gently separated from the capitula by hand. All seeds were then stored dry at 4 C for 4 wk (Experiments 1, 2), 13 wk (Experiment 4), or 24 wk (Experiment 3) before experiments were initiated (Table 1). Seeds were counted into lots of 50 using a seed counter (Seedburo Seed Counter, Seedburo Equipment, Des Plaines, IL) and placed on moist blotter paper in petri dishes, which were sealed with Parafilm® (Bemis Company, Neenah, WI).

Experimental Design and Treatments

Experiment 1. Four separate experiments were performed. Factors included temperature and light for all experiments and seed population, stratification, and scarification treatments for select experiments (Table 1). Experiment 1 followed a three-way factorial design involving four temperatures, two light conditions, and two populations. Temperature treatments consisted of day and night temperatures on a 14:10 h cycle: 15:5 C (day:night), 20:10 C, 25:15 C, and 30:20 C. These temperature regimes are reasonable for New York State and the Centaurea genus (Clements et al. Reference Clements, Harmon and Young2010; Joley et al. Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003; Pitcairn et al. Reference Pitcairn, Young, Clements and Balciunas2002; Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005). One incubator (model I36VL, Percival Scientific, Perry, IA) was used for each temperature, with petri dishes distributed randomly within incubators. For the light treatment, uncovered petri dishes of seeds were exposed to a 14:10 h L:D photoperiod with light levels of approximately 80 μmol m−2 sec−1 at a distance of 15 cm from the light fixtures. Petri dishes of seeds in the dark treatment were placed in the same growth chambers but were wrapped in aluminum foil. All petri dishes were placed in sealed plastic bags to further reduce drying. Non-stratified, scarified seeds from the Jacobson and McLean populations were tested. Each treatment combination was replicated five times for a total of 80 experimental units (each experimental unit was a dish of 50 seeds).

Dishes were checked for germination daily for 7 d, every other day for the next 10 d, and then twice more before the experiment ended after 28 d. More than 90% of germination occurred within the first 7 d (data not shown). Percent germination was calculated for each dish, with germination defined as the emergence of the radicle from the seed coat. Seeds for the dark treatment were checked in a dark room under a dim green light (flashlight wrapped in multiple layers of green plastic film; Bemiss-Jason Cellophane, Neenah, WI) (Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988; Oliveira and Garcia Reference Oliveira and Garcia2019). Aluminum foil was replaced each time the seeds were checked to prevent seeds from being exposed to light from pinholes resulting from the folding and unfolding of the foil.

Viability of seeds for each dish was estimated immediately following the experiment by holding nongerminated seeds at ca. 28 C for an additional 2 wk of germination followed by a 0.1% tetrazolium chloride test of remaining firm seeds. Seeds that were covered with fungi or that collapsed when pressed gently were considered dead. Total viability averaged 93% to 95% across experiments.

Experiment 2. The experimental design and data collection were the same as for Experiment 1, except that dishes of seeds were cold-wet stratified for 28 d at 4 C before testing the seeds for germination (Table 1). Dishes for the dark treatment were wrapped in aluminum foil before stratification. A total of 80 experimental units were used.

Experiment 3. The experimental design and data collection were similar to Experiment 2, including cold-wet stratification of seeds, except that four populations were tested (Jacobson, McLean, FLNF, Fort Plain; Table 1) for a total of 160 experimental units. Light-proof bags (Orca Grow Film, Urban Sunshine, Orlando, FL) were used instead of aluminum foil for the dark treatment.

Experiment 4. The experimental design and data collection were similar to Experiment 1, except that two scarification treatments—scarified (rubbing board removal of seeds) and non-scarified (hand removal of seeds)—were tested with a single population (FLNF; Table 1). Light-proof bags were used for the dark treatment. A total of 80 experimental units were used.

Statistical Analysis

For each experiment, percent germination data were transformed using the arcsine square-root transformation and analyzed with ANOVA (PROC MIXED, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Standard errors for back-transformed data were approximated using the methods of Deming (Reference Deming1964). Stepwise removal of nonsignificant interaction terms determined the best model. Means for significant factors were separated using Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test.

Results and Discussion

We conducted four factorial experiments to test the effects of temperature, light, stratification, scarification, and population on C. × moncktonii seed germinability, which enabled us to evaluate our five hypotheses.

Hypothesis 1: Centaurea × moncktonii Seed Germination Rates Will Be Greatest at Moderate Temperatures

Across all experiments and populations, percent germination was typically highest for the three warmest temperature regimes under light. Differences between these three regimes were usually not significant. For example, germination under light in Experiment 1 was higher (80% to 94%) under the three warmest temperature regimes than in the coldest treatment (29% to 38%) (Figure 1). Experiment 2 was different in that germination under light was highest (97% to 99% averaged over both populations) under the three warmest temperature regimes but also high (91%) at 15:5 C (Figure 2). The temperature responses observed under light in Experiments 3 and 4 were qualitatively similar to the patterns observed in Experiments 2 and 1, respectively (Figures 3 and 4), with all populations in Experiment 3 achieving more than 80% germination, even in the coldest treatment. Without light, germination was highest in the warmest and, in some cases, the second-warmest temperature regimes (Figures 14). In Experiment 1, dark germination rates were higher in the warmest two treatments (42% to 78%) than in the coldest two treatments (4% to 15%) (Figure 1). In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, dark germination often increased as temperatures increased (Figures 24). In all cases, germination without light was higher under 25:15 C regimes than under 20:10 C regimes (Figures 14). Because percent germination generally increased (and did not decrease) with increasing temperatures when other factors were held constant (Table 2), our hypothesis is refuted.

Figure 1. Percent germination in Experiment 1 (non-stratified and scarified seeds) from two Centaurea × moncktonii populations from New York State under different temperature regimes and light environments. Points not labeled with the same lowercase letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 2. Percent germination in Experiment 2 (cold-wet stratified and scarified seeds) averaged over two Centaurea × moncktonii populations from New York State under different temperature regimes and light environments. Points not labeled with the same lowercase letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 3. Percent germination in Experiment 3 (cold-wet stratified and scarified seeds) from four Centaurea × moncktonii populations from New York State under different temperature regimes and light environments. FLNF, Finger Lakes National Forest. Points not labeled with the same lowercase letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 4. Percent germination in Experiment 4 (non-stratified and scarified or non-scarified seeds) from the Finger Lakes National Forest (FLNF) population in New York State under different temperature regimes and light environments. Points not labeled with the same lowercase letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Table 2. ANOVA results for four experiments examining the effects of temperature, light, seed population and/or scarification on non-stratified or stratified seeds of Centaurea × moncktonii from New York State.

a Abbreviations: num. df, numerator degrees of freedom; den. df, denominator degrees of freedom.

These data suggest that the optimal temperature regime for germination of New York populations of C. × moncktonii may be 20 to 30 C alternating with 10 to 20 C. These ranges are slightly warmer than those measured in other Centaurea species, in which germination may be maximized under periods of 15 to 25 C alternating with 2 to 15 C (Clements et al. Reference Clements, Harmon and Young2010; Joley et al. Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003; Pitcairn et al. Reference Pitcairn, Young, Clements and Balciunas2002; Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005). The difference could reflect either interspecific variation or a regional effect; previous studies were carried out in the western United States. Environmental requirements for germination may be relatively evolvable (Hierro et al. Reference Hierro, Eren, Khetsuriani, Diaconu, Török, Montesinos, Andonian, Kikodze, Janoian, Villarreal, Estanga-Mollica and Callaway2009; Pitcairn et al. Reference Pitcairn, Young, Clements and Balciunas2002; Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005).

Hypothesis 2: More Seeds Will Germinate in Alternating Lighted Conditions Than Constant Darkness

The lower germination rates and increased temperature responses observed in darkness (Figures 14) indicate that light and a light–temperature interaction, respectively, affect percent germination. Both factors were highly significant in all experiments (Table 2). The 14:10 h L:D cycle always increased germination relative to continuous darkness under the 15:5 and 20:10 C temperature regimes and usually also under the 25:15 C regime (Figures 14). Because alternating lighted conditions stimulated germination in all experiments, our hypothesis is supported.

Most previous studies have found that light can stimulate germination in Centaurea species (Joley et al. Reference Joley, Schoenig, Casanave, Maddox and Mackey1997, Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003; Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988), with occasional exceptions potentially linked to storage treatments that weakened primary dormancy (Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988; Watson and Renney Reference Watson and Renney1974). The significant effects reported here agree with this consensus. Our findings suggest that C. × moncktonii germination may be inhibited by low-light environments or deep burial in soil or litter. However, light limitation will not completely prevent germination. Under warm temperature regimes, we observed high germination rates in the dark relative to some previous Centaurea measurements (Joley et al. Reference Joley, Schoenig, Casanave, Maddox and Mackey1997, Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003; Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988). High rates of germination in the dark have been reported before (Maguire and Overland [1959] cited in Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005; Clements et al. Reference Clements, Harmon and Young2010; Davis Reference Davis1990; Eddleman and Romo Reference Eddleman and Romo1988; Pitcairn et al. Reference Pitcairn, Young, Clements and Balciunas2002; Watson and Renney Reference Watson and Renney1974; Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005), including in the parental species C. nigra (Silvertown Reference Silvertown1980). Our findings might represent a conservative estimate of the stimulatory effect of light: there is some evidence that the dim green light used to check dark treatments can affect germination rate (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). This possibility should be accounted for in future investigations of dark germination and the consistently significant interactions between temperature and light environments (Table 2).

Hypothesis 3: Seed Germination Rates Will Not Vary between Populations

Germination rates were similar across populations under all temperature regimes with light and the lowest and highest temperature treatments in the dark (Figures 1 and 3), although there was some variability between populations under midrange temperature treatments in the dark (Figures 1 and 3). In Experiment 2, the Jacobson population had a higher overall germination rate (86%) than the McLean population (77%) (data not shown). In one case, population affected responses to temperature. In Experiment 3, the lowest germination (3% to 9%) occurred at 15:5 C in the dark for all four populations and also at 20:10 C in the dark for the FLNF and McLean populations, while the Fort Plain and Jacobson populations had higher germination at 20:10 C (Figure 3). However, dark germination rates differed between the 15:5 C and 20:10 C treatments for the FLNF population in Experiment 4 (Figure 4). Apart from the above exceptions, differences between populations were usually insignificant (Figures 1 and 3). Our hypothesis is generally supported.

Germination requirements and rates can vary substantially within Centaurea species (Clements et al. Reference Clements, Harmon and Young2010; Pitcairn et al. Reference Pitcairn, Young, Clements and Balciunas2002; Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005). However, the four sites in this study were distinguished by soil type and land-use characteristics rather than by geographic distance or climate. Optimal dormancy mechanisms and germination behavior may not differ strongly between sites. Emerging differences between population gene pools could also be blurred by migration or breeding with individuals elsewhere on the admixture continuum between C. nigra and C. jacea (Lachmuth et al. Reference Lachmuth, Molofsky, Milbrath, Suda and Keller2019). A prior field-based study reported larger differences in C. × moncktonii germination across the same four populations tested here (Milbrath and Biazzo Reference Milbrath and Biazzo2020). Our results are not incompatible with this report, as observed variation between field sites may have a strong environmental component. It is also worth noting that, while differences between populations typically fell below the significance threshold in pairwise comparisons within treatments (Figures 1 and 3), they did add explanatory power at the experimental level (Table 2).

Hypothesis 4: Cold-Wet Stratification Will Not Affect Germination Rates

Cold-wet stratification appeared to increase germination rates relative to non-stratified seeds (compare Figures 1 and 2), particularly at lower temperatures in either light treatment. The hypothesis is refuted, although future work should confirm this result by testing stratified against non-stratified seeds in a single experiment. Cold-wet stratification has been shown to break dormancy in C. stoebe (Eddleman and Romo Reference Eddleman and Romo1988), whereas other North American and European Centaurea species may not germinate at higher rates following stratification (Luna et al. Reference Luna, Pérez, Céspedes and Moreno2008; Milberg and Andersson Reference Milberg and Andersson1998; White et al. Reference White, Boutin, Dalton, Henkelman and Carpenter2009). The presence or absence of stratification effects may reflect native habitat: cold and wet conditions are more likely to alleviate dormancy in temperate species that typically germinate after cold, wet winters (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). Other aspects of handling, such as seed storage time before stratification, can also enhance or diminish the effects of stratification (Eddleman and Romo Reference Eddleman and Romo1988). In this study, the duration of cold-dry storage (4 wk, Experiment 2; or 24 wk, Experiment 3) before stratification did not have an obvious impact on germination rates (compare Figures 2 and 3). However, it is possible that testing short and long storage periods within the same experiment, including a no-storage treatment, or increasing storage temperature would reveal subtle effects attributable to afterripening.

Hypothesis 5: Scarification Will Not Affect Germination Rates

For non-stratified seeds of the FLNF population, scarification did not significantly increase germination relative to non-scarified seeds under any combination of temperature and light treatments (Figure 4). A significant interaction did occur among temperature, light, and scarification treatments (Table 2), which is partially attributable to the fact that non-scarified seeds had a higher germination rate than scarified seeds under the 30:20 C temperature regime in darkness (Figure 4). Because other differences between scarified and non-scarified seed germination rates were not significant (Figure 4), our hypothesis is mostly supported. There has been little work on the effects of scarification in Centaurea species, although it seems to be unnecessary in Californian C. solstitialis (Benefield et al. Reference Benefield, DiTomaso, Kyser and Tschohl2001). In European Centaurea taxa, elaiosome removal may either promote or inhibit germination (Imbert Reference Imbert2006; Viegi et al. Reference Viegi, Vangelisti and Pacini2003), and scarification by fire does not promote germination (Riba et al. Reference Riba, Rodrigo, Colas and Retana2002). It is not yet clear how these results relate to mechanical scarification by rubbing board (present study) or to events that increase seed permeability in nature (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2014).

Ecological Implications

Centaurea × moncktonii seed germination occurred across a wide range of abiotic environments, although rates were highest under warm temperatures and light following wet-cold stratification. Under these optimal conditions, germination rate approached 100% for all populations (Figures 2 and 3). These values are consistent with the maximum germination rates of other North American Centaurea species (Joley et al. Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003; Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988; Pitcairn et al. Reference Pitcairn, Young, Clements and Balciunas2002; Young et al. Reference Young, Clements, Pitcairn, Balciunas, Enloe, Turner and Harmon2005). They are also consistent with estimates of initial seed viability in C. × moncktonii, which are higher than the actual germination rates achieved in field-placed trays (Milbrath and Biazzo Reference Milbrath and Biazzo2020). The potential for high germination rates may be adaptive if the multiyear survival of dormant seeds is low (Milbrath and Biazzo Reference Milbrath and Biazzo2020).

For all experiments and populations, minimum germination occurred under the coldest temperature regime(s) in the dark. Germination rates were always below 21% under these conditions, regardless of stratification, storage time, and scarification treatment (Figures 14). Although we did not test stratified against non-stratified seeds within a single experiment, our data suggest that cold-wet stratification increased germination rates under cold and/or dark conditions (compare Figure 1 with Figures 2 and 3). Most dramatically, stratification increased germination under the coldest light treatment from under 40% to more than 80% for all populations (compare Figure 1 with Figures 2 and 3). This finding may help explain why the primary seedling flush occurs in spring (Winston et al. Reference Winston, Schwarzlander, Randall and Peardon2012; LRM, personal observation): after dormancy-weakening winter exposure to wet and cold conditions, a broad range of abiotic environments will support germination. In autumn, seeds have not recently experienced winter conditions, so they may be more dormant and may require more specific temperature and light environments to germinate.

A small percentage of seeds in every population germinated even under unfavorable conditions (Figures 14). After observing a similar trend in C. diffusa and C. stoebe, Nolan and Upadhyaya (Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988) concluded that seeds fell into three categories: seeds without primary dormancy, seeds with primary dormancy released by light, and seeds with primary dormancy not released by light. All three categories were represented in each species, site, and individual plant. The authors viewed this germination polymorphism as an adaption to promote distribution in time (Bewley and Black Reference Bewley and Black1982; Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988). In C. diffusa, variation in germination time not only provides population-level protection against disaster (Berube and Myers Reference Berube and Myers1982) but also decreases intraspecific competition (Sheley and Larson Reference Sheley and Larson1996). Our findings suggest that C. × moncktonii may likewise rely on germination polymorphism, perhaps for similar reasons. For C. × moncktonii seeds, variation in light requirements is only one of several sources of variation in germinability (Table 2). Nolan and Upadhyaya (Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988) also reported population-level and plant-level differences in average germinability, which reflected differences in the proportions of seeds in the three dormancy categories. It could be useful to view the subtle population-level differences observed in C. × moncktonii (Figures 13) through a similar lens. If selection and/or genetic drift can modify the relative frequencies of traits related to germination, these changes may lead to measurable changes in the distribution of germination requirements within the population and ultimately to visible changes in outcomes like the frequency of autumn germination.

Several authors have suggested that the invasiveness and competitiveness of C. × moncktonii (Lachmuth et al. Reference Lachmuth, Molofsky, Milbrath, Suda and Keller2019; Vilà et al. Reference Vilà, Weber and Antonio2000) and other Centaurea hybrids (Blair et al. Reference Blair, Blumenthal and Hufbauer2012; Blair and Hufbauer Reference Blair and Hufbauer2010) may reflect increased fitness due to hybridization. The classic hypothesis of increased hybrid fitness (Ellstrand and Schierenbeck Reference Ellstrand and Schierenbeck2000; Hovick and Whitney Reference Hovick and Whitney2014) is theoretically consistent with the fact that C. × moncktonii may occupy larger or different ranges than the parental species C. nigra and C. jacea in North America (Roché and Roché Reference Roché and Roché1991). However, this hypothesis cannot be tested using only the data presented here, given the scarcity of information about germination requirements for the parental species. The relationships between dormancy traits, germination rates, and recruitment rates are also complex and highly dependent on environmental conditions (Milbrath and Biazzo Reference Milbrath and Biazzo2020). Ongoing research efforts seek to characterize seedling emergence success and establishment in different habitats.

Conclusions

Centaurea × moncktonii, a hybrid of C. nigra and C. jacea, is an invasive weed found in many parts of North America (Keil and Ochsmann Reference Keil and Ochsmann2006). Seeds from four New York populations of C. × moncktonii germinated under a broad range of temperature, light, seed stratification, and scarification treatments. However, the treatments had significant impacts on germination rates, which were maximized under warm temperatures and light following wet-cold stratification. These findings suggest that C. × moncktonii uses germination polymorphism (Bewley and Black Reference Bewley and Black1982; Nolan and Upadhyaya Reference Nolan and Upadhyaya1988) to combine simultaneous and continuous germination strategies (Clements et al. Reference Clements, Harmon and Young2010; Salisbury Reference Salisbury1929). Nearly all seeds can germinate under optimal conditions, whereas suboptimal conditions allow only weakly dormant and nondormant seeds to germinate. This approach allows for adaptation to diverse environments and may facilitate future population increases and range expansion.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jeromy Biazzo, USDA-ARS, for his help in the collection and cleaning of seed samples and growth chamber setup. We are also grateful for the help provided by the late Jonathan Hunn, especially in early trials. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency or the commercial or not-for-profit sectors. No conflicts of interest have been declared.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Nathan S. Boyd, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center

References

Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM (2014) Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier. 666 p Google Scholar
Benefield, CB, DiTomaso, JM, Kyser, GB, Tschohl, A (2001) Reproductive biology of yellow starthistle: maximizing late-season control. Weed Sci 49:8390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berube, DE, Myers, JH (1982) Suppression of knapweed invasion by crested wheatgrass in the dry interior of British Columbia. J Range Manage 35:459–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, JD, Black, M (1982) Dormancy. Pages 60–125 in Physiology and Biochemistry of Seeds in Relation to Germination: Viability, Dormancy, and Environmental Control. Berlin: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, AC, Blumenthal, D, Hufbauer, RA (2012) Hybridization and invasion: an experimental test with diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa Lam.). Evol Appl 5:1728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, AC, Hufbauer, RA (2010) Hybridization and invasion: one of North America’s most devastating invasive plants shows evidence for a history of interspecific hybridization. Evol Appl 3:4051 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clements, CD, Harmon, D, Young, JA (2010) Diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) seed germination. Weed Sci 58:369373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, ES (1990) Spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa L.) seed longevity, chemical control and seed morphology. Master’s thesis. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University. 109 pGoogle Scholar
Deming, WE (1964) Statistical Adjustment of Data. 2nd ed. New York: Dover. 261 pGoogle Scholar
DiTomaso, JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, PM (2012) Centaurea x moncktonii C. E Britton, meadow or protean knapweed in the Niagara Frontier Region. Clintonia 27:57 Google Scholar
Eddleman, LE, Romo, JT (1988) Spotted knapweed germination response to stratification, temperature, and water stress. Can J Bot 66:653657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellstrand, NC, Schierenbeck, KA (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:70437050 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, M, Thompson, K (2005) The Ecology of Seeds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 250 p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch-Savage, WE, Leubner-Metzger, G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol 171:501523 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, RA, Renney, AJ (1963) A growth inhibitor found in Centaurea spp. Can J Plant Sci 43:475481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Jacas, N, Uysal, T, Romashchenko, K, Suárez-Santiago, VN, Ertuğrul, K, Susanna, A (2006) Centaurea revisited: a molecular survey of the Jacea group. Ann Bot 98:741753 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, OJ, de Loose, M, Vekemans, X, Meerts, P (2001) Allozyme segregation and inter-cytotype reproductive barriers in the polyploid complex Centaurea jacea . Heredity 87:136145 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, P, Cranston, R (1979) An economic evaluation of control methods for diffuse and spotted knapweed in western Canada. Can J Plant Sci 59:375382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hierro, JL, Eren, Ö, Khetsuriani, L, Diaconu, A, Török, K, Montesinos, D, Andonian, K, Kikodze, D, Janoian, L, Villarreal, D, Estanga-Mollica, ME, Callaway, RM (2009) Germination responses of an invasive species in native and non-native ranges. Oikos 118:529538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovick, SM, Whitney, KD (2014) Hybridisation is associated with increased fecundity and size in invasive taxa: meta-analytic support for the hybridisation-invasion hypothesis. Ecol Lett 17:14641477 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imbert, E (2006) Dispersal by ants in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae): what is the elaiosome for? Plant Species Biol 21:109117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joley, DB, Maddox, DM, Schoenig, SE, Mackey, BE (2003) Parameters affecting germinability and seed bank dynamics in dimorphic achenes of Centaurea solstitialis in California. Can J Bot 81:9931007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joley, DB, Schoenig, SE, Casanave, KA, Maddox, DM, Mackey, BE (1997) Effect of light and temperature on germination of dimorphic achenes of Centaurea solstitialis in California. Can J Bot 75:21312139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahmen, S, Poschlod, P (2008) Does germination success differ with respect to seed mass and germination season? Experimental testing of plant functional trait responses to grassland management. Ann Bot 101:541548 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kartesz, JT (2014) BONAP’s North American Plant Atlas. http://bonap.net/napa. Accessed: August 25, 2020Google Scholar
Keil, DJ, Ochsmann, J (2006) Centaurea. Pages 52, 57, 58, 67, 83, 84, 96, 171, 172, 176–178, 181–194 in Flora of North America Editorial Committee, ed. Flora of North America North of Mexico. New York: Flora of North America AssociationGoogle Scholar
Kucera, B, Cohn, MA, Leubner-Metzger, G (2005) Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci Res 15:281307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachmuth, S, Molofsky, J, Milbrath, L, Suda, J, Keller, SR (2019) Associations between genomic ancestry, genome size and capitula morphology in the invasive meadow knapweed hybrid complex (Centaurea × moncktonii) in eastern North America. AoB Plants 11, 10.1093/aobpla/plz055 Google Scholar
Larson, L, Kiemnec, G (1997) Differential germination by dimorphic achenes of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.) under water stress. J Arid Environ 37:107114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesica, P, Shelly, JS (1996) Competitive effects of Centaurea maculosa on the population dynamics of Arabis fecunda . Bull Torrey Bot Club 123:111121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, B, Pérez, B, Céspedes, B, Moreno, JM (2008) Effect of cold exposure on seed germination of 58 plant species comprising several functional groups from a mid-mountain Mediterranean area. Écoscience 15:478484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milberg, P, Andersson, L (1998) Does cold stratification level out differences in seed germinability between populations? Plant Ecol 134:225234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbrath, LR, Biazzo, J (2020) Demography of meadow and spotted knapweed populations in New York. Northeast Nat 27:485501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, TW, Lucero, C (2014) Meadow knapweed (Centaurea debeauxii) response to herbicides and mechanical control. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 7:503–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, EI (1963) Factors controlling the germination date of winter annuals. J Ecol 51:625638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, DG, Upadhyaya, MK (1988) Primary seed dormancy in diffuse and spotted knapweed. Can J Plant Sci 68:775783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, TGS, Garcia, QS (2019) Germination ecology of the perennial herb Xyris longiscapa: inter-annual variation in seed germination and seasonal dormancy cycles. Seed Sci Res 29:179183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcairn, MJ, Young, JA, Clements, CD, Balciunas, JOE (2002) Purple starthistle (Centaurea calcitrapa) seed germination. Weed Technol 16:452–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qaderi, MM, Lynch, AL, Godin, VJ, Reid, DM (2013) Single and interactive effects of temperature, carbon dioxide, and watering regime on the invasive weed black knapweed (Centaurea nigra). Écoscience 20:328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosevich, SR, Holt, JS, Ghersa, CM (2007) Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants: Relationship to Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 453 p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riba, M, Rodrigo, A, Colas, B, Retana, J (2002) Fire and species range in Mediterranean landscapes: an experimental comparison of seed and seedling performance among Centaurea taxa. J Biogeogr 29:135146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roché, CT, Roché, BF Jr (1988) Distribution and amount of four knapweed (Centaurea L.) species in eastern Washington. Northwest Sci 62:242253 Google Scholar
Roché, CT, Roché, BF Jr (1991) Meadow knapweed invasion in the Pacific Northwest, USA and British Columbia, Canada. Northwest Sci 65:5361 Google Scholar
Roché, CT, Thill, DC, Shafii, B (1997) Reproductive phenology in yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Weed Sci 45:763770 Google Scholar
Salisbury, EJ (1929) The biological equipment of species in relation to competition. J Ecol 17:197222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schirman, R (1981) Seed production and spring seedling establishment of diffuse and spotted knapweed. J Range Manage 34:4547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheley, RL, Jacobs, JS, Carpinelli, MF (1998) Distribution, biology, and management of diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) and spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa). Weed Technol 12:353362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheley, RL, Larson, LL (1996) Emergence date effects on resource partitioning between diffuse knapweed seedlings. J Range Manage 49:241244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvertown, J (1980) Leaf-canopy-induced seed dormancy in a grassland flora. New Phytol 85:109118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soons, MB, Heil, GW (2002) Reduced colonization capacity in fragmented populations of wind-dispersed grassland forbs. J Ecol 90:10331043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, BM, Rose, ST, Belles, WS (1980) Effect of canopy cover, seeding depth, and soil moisture on emergence of Centaurea maculosa and C. diffusa . Weed Res 20:8790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, AS, Massatti, R, Giles, D (2009) Controlling Meadow Knapweed with Manual Removal, Mulching, and Seeding. Corvallis, OR: Institute for Applied Ecology. 22 p Google Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2020) USDA PLANTS Database. https://plants.usda.gov/java. Accessed: August 24, 2020 Google Scholar
Viegi, L, Vangelisti, R, Pacini, E (2003) The achene pappi and elaisomes of Centaurea L.: dispersal and germination in some Italian species. Isr J Plant Sci 51:4554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilà, M, Weber, E, Antonio, CM (2000) Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biol Invasions 2:207217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, AK, Renney, AJ (1974) The biology of Canadian weeds: 6. Centaurea diffusa and C. maculosa . Can J Plant Sci 54:687701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldy, T, Werier, D, Nelson, A (2020) New York Flora Atlas. Albany, NY: New York Flora Association. http://newyork.plantatlas.usf.edu. Accessed: August 25, 2020Google Scholar
White, AL, Boutin, C, Dalton, RL, Henkelman, B, Carpenter, D (2009) Germination requirements for 29 terrestrial and wetland wild plant species appropriate for phytotoxicity testing. Pest Manag Sci 65:1926 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, R, Schwarzlander, M, Randall, CB, Peardon, R (2012) Biology and biological control of knapweeds. FHTET-2011-05. Morgantown, WV: USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team. 139 pGoogle Scholar
Young, JA, Clements, CD, Pitcairn, MJ, Balciunas, J, Enloe, S, Turner, C, Harmon, D (2005) Germination-temperature profiles for achenes of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Weed Technol 19:815823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, JA, Evans, RA, Eckert, RE (1969) Population dynamics of downy brome. Weed Sci 17:2026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimdahl, RL (2007) Weed-Crop Competition: A Review. 2nd ed. Ames, IA: Wiley. 235 p Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Seed handling and treatments for four germination experiments on Centaurea × moncktonii seeds collected in New York State (n = 5 per treatment combination).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Percent germination in Experiment 1 (non-stratified and scarified seeds) from two Centaurea × moncktonii populations from New York State under different temperature regimes and light environments. Points not labeled with the same lowercase letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Percent germination in Experiment 2 (cold-wet stratified and scarified seeds) averaged over two Centaurea × moncktonii populations from New York State under different temperature regimes and light environments. Points not labeled with the same lowercase letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Percent germination in Experiment 3 (cold-wet stratified and scarified seeds) from four Centaurea × moncktonii populations from New York State under different temperature regimes and light environments. FLNF, Finger Lakes National Forest. Points not labeled with the same lowercase letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Percent germination in Experiment 4 (non-stratified and scarified or non-scarified seeds) from the Finger Lakes National Forest (FLNF) population in New York State under different temperature regimes and light environments. Points not labeled with the same lowercase letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 5

Table 2. ANOVA results for four experiments examining the effects of temperature, light, seed population and/or scarification on non-stratified or stratified seeds of Centaurea × moncktonii from New York State.