Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T13:58:33.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A peculiar leg structure in the first non-biting midge described from Cambay amber, India (Diptera: Chironomidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2018

Marta Zakrzewska*
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80–308 Gdańsk, Poland. Email: marta.zakrzewska@biol.ug.edu.pl
Frauke Stebner
Affiliation:
Steinmann-Institute, Section Palaeontology, University of Bonn, Nussallee 8, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.
Mateusz Puchalski
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80–308 Gdańsk, Poland. Email: marta.zakrzewska@biol.ug.edu.pl
Hukam Singh
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, 53 University Road, Lucknow, India.
Wojciech Giłka
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80–308 Gdańsk, Poland. Email: marta.zakrzewska@biol.ug.edu.pl
*
*Corresponding author
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present the first specific record of a chironomid of the tribe Tanytarsini from early Eocene Cambay amber, India (52–53 Ma). The oldest known extinct tanytarsine genus, Gujaratomyia Giłka & Zakrzewska, gen. nov., is described on the basis of adult males of G. miripes Giłka & Zakrzewska, sp. nov. The species displays an unusual leg structure with unique leg ratios and tibial armature. The combination of the head and genital apparatus characters supports the hypothesis that Gujaratomyia and Cladotanytarsus are members of a common group within the subtribe Tanytarsina.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2018 

Today, Chironomidae have a worldwide distribution, with more than 7,000 species (Pape et al. Reference Pape, Blagoderov, Mostovski and Zhang2011). This family also has a rich fossil record, with the oldest finding, Aenne triassica Krzemiński & Jarzembowski, Reference Krzemiński and Jarzembowski1999 dating back to the Upper Triassic (∼202 Ma; Benton & Donoghue Reference Benton and Donoghue2007). Non-biting midges are commonly recorded in ambers of various origin: from the Cretaceous (e.g., in Lebanese amber; Veltz et al. Reference Veltz, Azar and Nel2007), through the Eocene (e.g., in Sakhalin amber; Baranov et al. Reference Baranov, Andersen and Perkovsky2015) to the Miocene (e.g., in Amazonian amber; Antoine et al. Reference Antoine, De Franceschi, Flynn, Nel, Baby, Benammi, Calderón, Espurt, Goswami and Salas-Gismondi2006). The vast majority of species of the chironomid tribe Tanytarsini have so far been described from extensively examined Baltic amber (∼43–48 Ma; Seredszus & Wichard Reference Seredszus and Wichard2007; Giłka Reference Giłka2010, 2011a; Giłka et al. Reference Giłka, Zakrzewska, Dominiak and Urbanek2013; Zakrzewska & Giłka, Reference Zakrzewska and Giłka2014, Reference Zakrzewska and Giłka2015a, Reference Zakrzewska and Giłkab; Zakrzewska et al. Reference Zakrzewska, Krzemiński and Giłka2016), whereas the oldest known member of this tribe is Nandeva pudens Giłka, Zakrzewska, Baranov, Wang & Stebner, Reference Giłka, Zakrzewska, Baranov, Wang and Stebner2016, found in Chinese Fushun amber (∼50–53 Ma; e.g., Wang et al. Reference Wang, Rust, Engel, Szwedo, Dutta, Nel, Fan, Meng, Shi, Jarzembowski, Wappler, Stebner, Fang, Mao, Zheng and Zhang2014); however, this fossil belongs to the genus that is presumably either a member of the Tanytarsini or is defined as the tribe's sister group (Giłka et al. Reference Giłka, Zakrzewska, Baranov, Wang and Stebner2016).

Cambay amber is found in several active opencast lignite mines located in the state of Gujarat, India, about 30 km northeast of Surat. The amber occurs in lignitic and mud-dominated sediments, which were deposited in a near-shore chenier plain system where the sediment input was seasonal (e.g., McCann Reference McCann2010). Cambay amber has been dated to the early Eocene (54 Ma; cf. Smith et al. Reference Smith, Kumar, Rana, Folie, Solé, Noiret, Steeman, Sahni and Rose2016, Stebner et al. Reference Stebner, Szadziewski, Singh, Gunkel and Rust2017a); it is thus contemporaneous with Fushun amber from China and slightly older than amber from the Baltic region. Furthermore, Cambay amber was formed at a time of expanding modern diversity, at the beginning of the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO) and just after the Late Palaeocene Thermal Maximum (LPTM) (e.g., Zachos et al. Reference Zachos, Dickens and Zeebe2008).

As in many other amber deposits, Chironomidae are the most common dipteran inclusions in Cambay amber, in which five subfamilies have been found so far. With nearly 50 % of all chironomids recorded, Chironominae (including the tribe Tanytarsini) is the most abundant, followed by Orthocladiinae, Tanypodinae, Podonominae and Prodiamesinae. The Tanytarsini is represented by three extant genera: Stempellina Thienemann & Bause in Bause, Reference Bause1913; Stempellinella Brundin, Reference Brundin1947; and Tanytarsus van der Wulp, Reference Wulp van der1874 (Stebner et al. Reference Stebner, Baranov, Zakrzewska, Singh and Giłka2017b); however, no specific description has been published so far. Therefore, a species of an unknown extinct genus presented below is the first tanytarsine and non-biting midge described from early Eocene Cambay amber.

1. Material and methods

The specimens examined are adult male chironomids preserved in early Eocene Cambay amber from India (54 Ma), derived from the Tadkeshwar lignite mine. The inclusions are part of the collection of the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences (BSIP), Lucknow, India. The amber was ground using a Buehler Phoenix Beta grinding machine and polished manually. Measurements of specimens are in micrometres, except for the total length (in millimetres, rounded off to the first decimal digit). The body length was measured from the antennal pedicel to the end of the gonostylus, and the wing from the arculus to the tip. Lengths of leg segments and palpomeres were rounded off to the nearest 5 μm and 1 μm, respectively. The antennal, leg and venarum ratios (AR, LR, VR) were calculated to the second decimal place. The morphological terminology and abbreviations follow Sæther (Reference Sæther1980). The photographs were taken using the microscope PZO Biolar SK14 and Helicon Focus 6 image stacking software.

2. Systematics

Family Chironomidae Newman, Reference Newman1834 Subfamily Chironominae Newman, Reference Newman1834 Tribe Tanytarsini Zavřel, Reference Zavřel1917 Subtribe(?) Tanytarsina Zavřel, Reference Zavřel1917 Gujaratomyia Giłka & Zakrzewska, gen. nov.

Type species. Gujaratomyia miripes Giłka & Zakrzewska, sp. nov. (by present designation and monotypy).

Etymology. After Gujarat, the state in Western India, where the Cambay amber deposits are located.

Diagnosis. Eyes bare, reniform. Antenna with 13 flagellomeres. Tibiae of all legs similarly short, much shorter than their femora; tarsus of mid leg extraordinarily long, with basitarsus much longer than tibia. Fore leg tibia with pair of stout apical bristles; mid and hind leg tibia with strongly elongated apical lobe, evenly tapering to bristle-like distal part, with apex bent, filiform. Gonostylus longer than gonocoxite; digitus absent; stem of median volsella short, apically branched into several lamellae.

Gujaratomyia miripes Giłka & Zakrzewska, sp. nov.

Holotype. Adult male (tarsi of left mid and both fore and hind legs missing) preserved in 10×6×2.5 mm piece of amber (early Eocene, 52–53 Ma, Tadkeshwar mine, Gujarat State, India; BSIP Tad-607 a; Fig. 1A).

Figure 1 Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov., adult male, holotype, BSIP Tad-607 a, early Eocene, 52–53 Ma, Tadkeshwar mine, Gujarat, India: (A) inclusion in amber; (B) habitus; (C) antenna (arrows indicate borders between flagellomeres, fm1–13); (D) wing.

Paratype. Adult male, incomplete specimen (only distal part of abdomen, including hypopygium, preserved) as syninclusion with the holotype (BSIP Tad-607 b). Other syninclusion: Chironominae, one female (BSIP Tad-607 c).

Etymology. The specific epithet is referred to the unusual leg structure described below.

Diagnosis. As for the genus.

Description. Adult male. Total length c.1.5 mm; wing length c.820 μm.

Head (Fig. 1B, C). Eyes bare, reniform, without dorsomedian extensions. Frontal tubercles conical, c.20 μm long. Antenna with 13 well discernible flagellomeres, AR 0.77, plume fully developed (Fig. 1C). Length of palpomeres 2–5: c.30 μm, 103 μm, 117 μm, 117 μm (ultimate palpomere slightly deformed). At least 16 clypeals.

Thorax chaetotaxy. Ac at least 16, Dc at least 12, Pa at least 3, Scts at least 8.

Wing (Fig. 1D). Slender, broadest at two-thirds of length, width: 220 μm, length/width ratio 3.73. Sc and R2+3 not observed. RM as parallel continuation of R4+5, slightly oblique relative to M. An long, ending well distally of cubital fork. FCu placed distinctly distally of RM, VRCu c.1.65. Veins ending as follows (in order from base to tip): An, Cu1, R1, M3+4 and R4+5, M1+2. Anal lobe weak. Squama bare. Wing, including membrane covered with macrotrichia in distal half at least.

Legs (Figs 1B, 2A–E). Coxae of mid and hind legs bearing several strong bristles (Fig. 1B). Tibiae of all legs similarly short, much shorter than their femora; tarsus of mid leg (the only preserved in the specimen examined) extraordinarily long, with basitarsus much longer than tibia (Fig. 2A); for length of leg segments and leg ratios see Table 1. Fore leg tibia armed with pair of stout apical bristles c.140–180 μm long (Fig. 2B). Mid and hind leg tibia with strongly elongated apical lobe, evenly tapering to bristle-like distal part, apex bent, filiform; each lobe bearing pair of subapical setae; length of whole structure c.75 μm (Fig. 2C–E). Sensilla chaetica on ta1 of p2 not observed. Pulvilli absent.

Figure 2 Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov., adult male, holotype, BSIP Tad-607 a, early Eocene, 52–53 Ma, Tadkeshwar mine, Gujarat, India: (A) mid and hind leg (fe=femur; ti=tibia; ta1–5=tarsomeres 1–5 of mid leg; arrows indicate borders between leg segments); (B–E) tibiae and tibial armature of fore (B) and hind leg (C–E).

Table 1 Leg segment lengths (μm) and leg ratios of male Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov. Abbreviations: p1–p3=legs of pair 1–3; fe=femur; ti=tibia; ta1–ta5=tarsomeres 1–5; LR=leg ratio.

Hypopygium (Fig. 3). Gonostylus 85 μm long, longer than gonocoxite, straight, with several long setae on apex. Anal tergite semicircular, with dense setae surrounding base of anal point. Anal point long, tapering to bevelled apex with small subapical pit (Fig. 3A, B), upturned in lateral view (Fig. 3C). Superior volsella stout, parallel-sided in proximal part, oblique relative to main body axis, with distal part slightly swollen and medially directed, bearing three long setae placed on distinct protuberances on median margin (Fig. 3A–E). Digitus absent. Stem of median volsella straight and short (c.12 μm), apically branched into one short and three longer lamellae (Fig. 3D, F, G). Inferior volsella arcuate, with enlarged apical part armed with dense setae.

Figure 3 Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov., adult male, early Eocene, 52–53 Ma, Tadkeshwar mine, Gujarat, India: (A–C) paratype, BSIP Tad-607 b, hypopygium and its structures in dorsal (A–B) and lateral (C) aspects. (D–G) holotype, BSIP Tad-607 a, hypopygium and its structures in ventral aspect: (E) superior volsella, magnified ca.6 times relative to (D); (F) median volsella, magnified ca.3 times relative to (D); (G) median volsella, magnified ca.6 times relative to (D).

3. Discussion

3.1. Systematic position of Gujaratomyia

Several unique characters of the legs and hypopygium have not been found in any extant/fossil chironomid and support our concept of erecting the new genus Gujaratomyia (see diagnosis). The slender wing with the reduced anal lobe, the RM vein placed as a parallel continuation of R4+5, the bare squama and the membrane covered with macrotrichia (Fig. 1D) form a set of characters typical of the Tanytarsini and testify to the position of Gujaratomyia within this tribe (cf. Giłka et al. Reference Giłka, Zakrzewska, Baranov, Wang and Stebner2016). Although the subtribal placement of the new genus remains open, a combination of characters (the reniform eyes without dorsomedian extensions; the antenna with 13 flagellomeres (Fig. 1C); and, above all, the stem of the hypopygial median volsella branched apically into lamellae (Fig. 3F, G)) suggests that Gujaratomyia and Cladotanytarsus Kieffer, Reference Kieffer1921a may be members of a common group within the subtribe Tanytarsina. Apart from the characters listed in the diagnosis and defined as apomorphies for Gujaratomyia (see also below), these two genera differ from each other in the absence/presence of the hypopygial digitus and in the gonocoxite–gonostylus length proportions.

3.2. Legs in the adult male of Gujaratomyia

3.2.1. Length proportions

In adult males of the Chironomidae, the fore legs are the longest and the mid legs the shortest, since the five-segmented tarsus of the fore leg is elongated the farthest, whereas the tarsomeres of the mid leg are the shortest. The rule of mid leg tarsomeres being strongly shortened applies, in particular, to species that are flightless or have only limited flying ability (Sæther Reference Sæther1971; Giłka Reference Giłka2011b, Reference Giłkac) (see below). In the Tanytarsini, the leg ratios LR1–3, calculated as the ratio of the length of the basitarsus to that of the tibia of the same leg, are as follows: LR1 > 1, LR2<1, LR3<1. In all the Tanytarsini, as in many chironomids, the fore leg femur is much longer than the tibia (fe1≫ti1), whereas the femora and tibiae of the mid and hind legs are approximately of the same length (fe2≈ti2, fe3≈ti3). The male of Gujaratomyia examined here diverges distinctly from these rules: the tarsomeres of the mid leg (especially the basitarsus) are strongly elongated and LR2 is more than 2.5. Interestingly, the femora of the mid and hind legs are more than twice the length of the tibiae (fe2≫ti2, fe3≫ti3), the proportions being much the same as those of the fore leg (Figs 1B, 2A; Table 1). The total length of the mid legs in male Gujaratomyia (unfortunately, the only one preserved intact in the specimens examined) is also relatively high, when compared with that in males of Eocene species of a similar body and wing lengths (Table 2; cf. Zakrzewska & Giłka Reference Zakrzewska and Giłka2015a, Reference Zakrzewska and Giłkab).

Table 2 Lengths of mid leg (μm), body (mm) and wing (μm) of male Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov. and several comparable Eocene species of the tribe Tanytarsini.

ain Zakrzewska & Giłka Reference Zakrzewska and Giłka2015a; bin Zakrzewska & Giłka Reference Zakrzewska and Giłka2015b

The strong elongation of the legs may be an expression of adaptations to non-typical mode of life and/or habitat, known in, for example, the related subfamily Orthocladiinae. The brachypterous Bryophaenocladius chrissichuckorum Epler, 2012, known from its ground mating behaviour, has long but stocky legs (Epler 2012). The fully-winged Troglocladius hajdi Andersen, Baranov & Hagenlund, Reference Andersen, Baranov, Hagenlund, Ivković, Kvifte and Pavlek2016 (in Anderson et al. Reference Andersen, Baranov, Hagenlund, Ivković, Kvifte and Pavlek2016), found in Croatian caves, features exceptionally long legs, the proportions of which (including the LR ratios), however, being within the range diagnostic for the subfamily; such legs, called “feelers”, are considered to be a part of a well-developed sensory system and an adaptation to live in caves (Andersen et al. Reference Andersen, Baranov, Hagenlund, Ivković, Kvifte and Pavlek2016). The leg and/or wing structure observed in the Orthocladiinae is not, however, fully comparable with those observed in Gujaratomyia, and cannot underpin a hypothesis of adaptations to a similar mode of life and/or habitat (see below).

In contrast to the long-legged chironomids, strongly shortened mid legs are observed in some of the Tanytarsini, for example Corynocera Zetterstedt, Reference Zetterstedt1838, Thienemanniola Kieffer, Reference Kieffer1921b and Tanytarsus tika (Tourenq, Reference Tourenq1975), in whose legs all the segments of the mid leg, and the tarsus in particular, are strongly shortened; nevertheless, the LR2<1, typical of the tribe, has been retained (Lehmann Reference Lehmann1973; Cranston Reference Cranston1980). The first two genera include brachypterous species, lacking the ability to fly; on the other hand, the non-typical leg length proportions in the winged male of T. tika are most likely an adaptation to being able to additionally inhabit the surface of the water or the ground. A parallel adaptation in the Tanytarsini mentioned above is the naked wing membrane, devoid of macrotrichia (cf. Cranston Reference Cranston1980). It is worth reiterating, however, that neither the rule of strong mid leg shortening, nor that of a reduced naked-wing membrane, applies to the male Gujaratomyia miripes.

3.2.2. Tibial armature

The tibiae of Tanytarsini imagines are armed with spurs and combs, the structure of which is a key generic character (i.a. Giłka Reference Giłka2011b). The tibia of the fore leg usually has a single spur but no combs. The anomaly of a double spur or comb occurring on the fore leg is known from both extant and fossil Tanytarsini (cf. Giłka & Paasivirta Reference Giłka and Paasivirta2008; Giłka et al. Reference Giłka, Zakrzewska, Dominiak and Urbanek2013; Zakrzewska & Giłka Reference Zakrzewska and Giłka2015a), whereas the presence of one or more stout bristles in place of the fore leg tibial spur is a diagnostic character recorded above all in fossil species of the genera Archistempellina Giłka & Zakrzewska, Reference Giłka, Zakrzewska, Dominiak and Urbanek2013, Corneliola Giłka & Zakrzewska, Reference Giłka, Zakrzewska, Dominiak and Urbanek2013 and Tanytarsus van der Wulp, Reference Wulp van der1874 (cf. Giłka Reference Giłka2010; Giłka et al. Reference Giłka, Zakrzewska, Dominiak and Urbanek2013; Zakrzewska et al. Reference Zakrzewska, Krzemiński and Giłka2016). This character appears also in Gujaratomyia (Fig. 2B).

The tibiae of the mid and hind legs of Tanytarsini are usually armed with two combs, consisting of teeth arranged in the shape of a fan. The combs may be separate or may form a uniform crown; only rarely they are absent (Giłka Reference Giłka2011b). There are usually two spurs on the mid and hind tibiae – one on each comb. They can be completely absent, or be present only on one of the two combs; sometimes they have a unique structure (Giłka Reference Giłka2011b, Reference Giłkac). In contrast to most Tanytarsini, combs and spurs do not occur in Gujaratomyia. In the male of this genus, the tibiae bear strongly elongated apical lobes tapering to a bristle-like distal part with a filiform apex (Fig. 2C–E). Somewhat similar structures, but never as these observed in Gujaratomyia, occur in some Tanytarsini lacking the (or with a limited) ability to fly, or showing a ground/water mating behaviour. Relatively small tibial lobes or pads can be observed in Cladotanytarsus in the subgenus Lenziella Kieffer, Reference Kieffer1922. However, the mid and hind legs in Lenziella are stocky, and the apical lobes of the tibiae are armed with dense setae, exceptionally with a single stout apical bristle (Giłka Reference Giłka2011c, fig. 8C). Nevertheless, all these are typical setae/bristles arising from tubercles, and are apparently not homologous with the bristle-like structures found in Gujaratomyia. Tanytarsus tika shows setose pads (Cranston Reference Cranston1980), similar to those found in Lenziella. The monotypic Thienemanniola also bears extensions on its mid and hind tibiae, along with a brush composed of the long setae, but their spurs are short, stout and strongly bent apically – similar to those known from Corynocera (Lehmann Reference Lehmann1973). However, the structures mentioned above, observed in the extant Tanytarsini, differ distinctly from those found in Gujaratomyia, the oldest extinct genus of this tribe.

3.2.3. Function

Despite the distinct leg structure suggestive of non-typical mode of life in the adult male of Gujaratomyia miripes, we see no reason to contend that the species' imago was limited in its flying ability, or occurred in a habitat not typical of the Chironomidae. Our opinion is based on the observation that: (1) the wing of Gujaratomyia is fully developed, and its membrane is covered by macrotrichia, a character typical of the flying Chironomidae; (2) the long and slender legs featured by Gujaratomyia are characteristic of flying species, as opposed to shortened and/or stout legs (and also palps and antennae) shown by brachypterous species; (3) Gujaratomyia lacks other characters typical of the chironomids with non-typical behaviour/habitat (e.g., caves) – Gujaratomyia has well-developed eyes, palps and antennae bearing fully plumose flagellum. We interpret the elongated legs in Gujaratomyia as a gliding-enhancement adaptation; enhancement of in-flight stimulus reception cannot be ruled out, either (cf. Andersen et al. Reference Andersen, Baranov, Hagenlund, Ivković, Kvifte and Pavlek2016). The non-typical tibial structures of Gujaratomyia most likely reflect adaptations somewhat similar to those found in the non-flying Tanytarsini, and may adapt the bearers to short-term presence on the water surface. However, it seems hardly plausible that they would function similarly on the ground surface.

In conclusion, we interpret the leg ratios and the tibial structures found in Gujaratomyia miripes as unique characters (these can be perceived as autapomorphies until the genus remains monotypic), which – in combination with the reniform broadly separated eyes, fully plumose 13-segmented antennal flagellum and several diagnostic hypopygial features – form a set not known from any other non-biting midge, and justify erection of the new genus.

3.3. Biogeography

Today, India harbours many endemic taxa, especially in the Western Ghats area (Myers et al. Reference Myers, Mittermeier, Mittermeier, Da Fonseca and Kent2000). In this context, Indian amber inclusions have proven to provide an important contribution to the discussion about India's complex geological history and the processes that shaped India's modern flora and fauna (summarised in Rust et al. Reference Rust, Singh, Rana, McCann, Singh, Anderson, Sarkar, Nascimbene, Stebner, Thomas, Solórzano-Kraemer, Williams, Engel, Sahni and Grimaldi2010). It has been shown that Indian amber inclusions show worldwide connections, whereas only minimal evidence for faunal isolation has been reported so far (Engel et al. Reference Engel, Grimaldi, Nascimbene and Singh2011, Reference Engel, Ortega-Blanco, Nascimbene and Singh2013; Grimaldi & Singh Reference Grimaldi and Singh2012; Grimaldi et al. Reference Grimaldi, Engel, Nascimbene and Singh2013a, Reference Grimaldi, Engel and Singhb; Rust et al. Reference Rust, Singh, Rana, McCann, Singh, Anderson, Sarkar, Nascimbene, Stebner, Thomas, Solórzano-Kraemer, Williams, Engel, Sahni and Grimaldi2010). Various biogeographic patterns of the Indian amber inclusions have been observed within the order Diptera (Rust et al. Reference Rust, Singh, Rana, McCann, Singh, Anderson, Sarkar, Nascimbene, Stebner, Thomas, Solórzano-Kraemer, Williams, Engel, Sahni and Grimaldi2010; Stebner et al. Reference Stebner, Szadziewski, Singh, Gunkel and Rust2017a, Reference Stebner, Singh, Rust and Grimaldic). At this stage of research, taxa that are endemic to the Indian subcontinent appear to be rather rare, and have been reported so far only from the families Keroplatidae (Vastaplatyura electrica Solórzano, Kraemer & Evenhuis, Reference Solórzano Kraemer and Evenhuis2008) and Psychodidae (Phlebotoiella eoindianensis Solórzano, Kraemer & Wagner, Reference Solórzano Kraemer and Wagner2009). Gujaratomyia gen. nov. now adds further evidence for the presence of endemic elements in Eocene India. The genus seems to be restricted to the Indian subcontinent, since neither fossil nor recent relatives are known from elsewhere. It must be considered, however, that the Tanytarsini are probably a rather young group, with the oldest members known from the early Eocene's Fushun amber (Giłka et al. Reference Giłka, Zakrzewska, Baranov, Wang and Stebner2016) and, as reported herein, from early Eocene Indian amber; a fact which doubtless has substantial implications for biogeographic patterns. In conclusion, many more studies on the Indian amber inclusions and their distributional patterns are needed to get a more complete picture of the origins and ranges of fossil as well as modern Indian insect faunas.

References

4. References

Andersen, T., Baranov, V., Hagenlund, L. K., Ivković, M., Kvifte, G. M. & Pavlek, M. 2016. Blind Flight? A New Troglobiotic Orthoclad (Diptera, Chironomidae) from the Lukina Jama-Trojama Cave in Croatia. PloS one 11(4), e0152884, 115.Google Scholar
Antoine, P. O., De Franceschi, D., Flynn, J. J., Nel, A., Baby, P., Benammi, M., Calderón, Y., Espurt, N., Goswami, A. & Salas-Gismondi, R. 2006. Amber from western Amazonia reveals Neotropical diversity during the middle Miocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(37), 13595–600.Google Scholar
Baranov, V., Andersen, T. & Perkovsky, E. E. 2015. Orthoclads from Eocene amber from Sakhalin (Diptera: Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae). Insect Systematics & Evolution 46, 359–78.Google Scholar
Bause, E. 1913. Die Metamorphose der Gattung Tanytarsus und einiger verwandter Tendipedidenart. Ein Beitrag zur Systematic der Tendipediden. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, supplement 2, 1126.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. & Donoghue, P. C. J. 2007. Paleontological evidence to date the tree of life. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 2653.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. 1947. Zur Kenntnis der Schwedischen Chironomiden. Arkiv för Zoologi 39, 195.Google Scholar
Cranston, P. S. 1980. A redescription and generic reassignment of the adults of Halotanytarsus tika Tourenq, 1975 (Diptera, Chironomidae). Annales de Limnologie 16, 203–09.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S., Grimaldi, D. A., Nascimbene, P. C. & Singh, H. 2011. The termites of Early Eocene Cambay amber, with the earliest record of Termitidae (Isoptera). ZooKeys 148, 105–23.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S., Ortega-Blanco, J., Nascimbene, P. C. & Singh, H. 2013. The bees of Early Eocene Cambay amber (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Melittology 25, 112.Google Scholar
Epler, J. H. 2012. A brachypterous Bryophaenocladius (Diptera: Chironomidae: Orthocladiinae) with hypopygium inversum from Heggie's Rock, Georgia, USA. Zootaxa 3355, 5161.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. 2010. A new species group in the genus Tanytarsus van der Wulp (Diptera: Chironomidae) based on a fossil record from Baltic amber. Acta Geologica Sinica [English Edition] 84, 714–19.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. 2011a. A new fossil Tanytarsus from Eocene Baltic amber, with notes on systematics of the genus (Diptera: Chironomidae). Zootaxa 3069, 6368.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. 2011b. Ochotkowate – Chironomidae, plemię: Tanytarsini, postaci dorosłe, samce. Klucze do oznaczania owadów Polski. [Non-biting midges – Chironomidae, tribe Tanytarsini, adult males. Keys for the Identification of Polish Insects]. No 177, Vol. XXVIII, Muchówki - Diptera, 14b. Polskie Towarzystwo Entomologiczne. Wrocław: Biologica Silesiae. 95 pp.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. 2011c. Six unusual Cladotanytarsus Kieffer: towards a systematics of the genus and resurrection of Lenziella Kieffer (Diptera: Chironomidae: Tanytarsini). Zootaxa 3100, 134.Google Scholar
Giłka, W., Zakrzewska, M., Dominiak, P. & Urbanek, A. 2013. Non-biting midges of the tribe Tanytarsini in Eocene amber from the Rovno region (Ukraine): a pioneer systematic study with notes on the phylogeny (Diptera: Chironomidae). Zootaxa 3736, 569–86.Google Scholar
Giłka, W., Zakrzewska, M., Baranov, V., Wang, B. & Stebner, F. 2016. The first fossil record of Nandeva Wiedenbrug, Reiss et Fittkau (Diptera: Chironomidae) in early Eocene Fushun amber from China. Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology 40(3), 390–97.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. & Paasivirta, L. 2008. On the systematics of the tribe Tanytarsini (Diptera: Chironomidae) – three new species from Finland. Entomologica Fennica 19, 4148.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A., Engel, M. S., Nascimbene, P. C. & Singh, H. 2013a. Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera, Aleuropteryginae) in amber from the Eocene of India and the Miocene of Hispaniola. American Museum Novitates 3770, 120.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A., Engel, M. S. & Singh, H. 2013b. Bugs in the biogeography: Leptosaldinae (Heteroptera: Leptopodidae) in amber from the Miocene of Hispaniola and Eocene of India. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 86, 226–43.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A. & Singh, H. 2012. The extinct genus Pareuthychaeta in Eocene ambers (Diptera: Schizophora: Ephydroidea). The Canadian Entomologist 144, 1728.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1921a. Synopse de la tribu des Chironomariae (Diptères). Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles 40, 269–77.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1921b. Chironomides nouveaux ou peu connus de la région paléarctique. Bulletin de la Société d'histoire naturelle de Metz 29: 51109.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1922. Noveaux Chironomides à larves aquatiques. Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles 41, 355–67.Google Scholar
Krzemiński, W. & Jarzembowski, E. 1999. Aenne triassica sp. n., the oldest representatives of the family Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 68, 445–49.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J. 1973. Systematik und phylogenetische Studie über die Gattung Thienemanniola Kieffer und Corynocera Zetterstedt (Diptera: Chironomidae). Hydrobiolgia 43, 381414.Google Scholar
McCann, T. 2010. Chenier plain sedimentation in the Palaeogene-age lignite-rich successions of the Surat area, Gujarat, western India. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 161, 335–51.Google Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–58.Google Scholar
Newman, E. 1834. Attempted division of British insects into natural orders. Entomological Magazine 2, 379431.Google Scholar
Pape, T., Blagoderov, V. & Mostovski, M. B. 2011. Order Diptera Linnaeus, 1758. In Zhang, Z.-Q. (ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148, 222–29.Google Scholar
Rust, J., Singh, H., Rana, R. S., McCann, T., Singh, L., Anderson, K. Sarkar, N., Nascimbene, P. F., Stebner, F., Thomas, J. C., Solórzano-Kraemer, M., Williams, C. J., Engel, M. S., Sahni, A. & Grimaldi, D. 2010. Biogeographic and evolutionary implications of a diverse paleobiota in amber from the early Eocene of India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(43), 18360–65.Google Scholar
Sæther, O. A. 1971. Four new and unusual Chironomidae (Diptera). Canadian Entomologist 103, 17991827.Google Scholar
Sæther, O. A. 1980. Glossary of chironomid morphology terminology (Diptera: Chironomidae). Entomologica scandinavica, supplement 14, 151.Google Scholar
Seredszus, F. & Wichard, W. 2007. Fossil chironomids (Insecta, Diptera) in Baltic amber. Palaeontographica A 279(1–3), 4991.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Kumar, K., Rana, R. S., Folie, A. Solé, F., Noiret, C., Steeman, T., Sahni, A. & Rose, K. 2016. New early Eocene vertebrate assemblage from western India reveals a mixed fauna of European and Gondwana affinities. Geoscience Frontiers 7, 9691001.Google Scholar
Solórzano Kraemer, M. M. & Evenhuis, N. L. 2008. The first keroplatid (Diptera: Keroplatidae) species from the Lower Eocene amber of Vastan, Gujarat, India. Zootaxa 1816, 5760.Google Scholar
Solórzano Kraemer, M. M. & Wagner, R. 2009. The first psychodid (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) species from the Lower Eocene amber of Vastan, Gujarat, India. Zootaxa 2152, 6368.Google Scholar
Stebner, F., Szadziewski, R., Singh, H., Gunkel, S. & Rust, J. 2017a. Biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from Cambay amber indicate that the Eocene fauna of the Indian subcontinent was not isolated. PLoS one 12(1), e0169144.Google Scholar
Stebner, F., Baranov, V., Zakrzewska, M., Singh, H. & Giłka, W. 2017b. The Chironomidae diversity based on records from early Eocene Cambay amber, India, with implications on habitats of fossil Diptera. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 475, 154–61.Google Scholar
Stebner, F., Singh, H., Rust, J. & Grimaldi, D. 2017c. Lygistorrhinidae (Diptera: Bibionomorpha: Sciaroidea) in early Eocene Cambay amber. PeerJ 5, e3313.Google Scholar
Tourenq, J.-N. 1975. Recherches écologiques sur les Chironomidés (Diptera) de Camargue. Doctoral Dissertation, Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
Veltz, I., Azar, D., & Nel, A. 2007. New chironomid flies in Early Cretaceous Lebanese amber (Diptera: Chironomidae). African Invertebrates 48(1), 169–91.Google Scholar
Wang, B., Rust, J., Engel, M. S., Szwedo, J., Dutta, S., Nel, A., Fan, Y., Meng, F., Shi, G., Jarzembowski, E. A., Wappler, T., Stebner, F., Fang, Y., Mao, L., Zheng, D. & Zhang, H. 2014. A diverse paleobiota in early Eocene Fushun amber from China. Current Biology 24, 1606–10.Google Scholar
Wulp van der, F. M. 1874. Dipterologische aanteekneningen. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 17, 109–48.Google Scholar
Zachos, J. C., Dickens, G. R. & Zeebe, R. E. 2008. An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature 451, 279–83.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M., Krzemiński, W. & Giłka, W. 2016. Towards the diversity of non-biting midges of the tribe Tanytarsini from Eocene Baltic amber (Diptera: Chironomidae). Palaeontologia Electronica 19.2.18A, 121.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M. & Giłka, W. 2013. In the Eocene, the extant genus Caladomyia occurred in the Palaearctic (Diptera: Chironomidae: Tanytarsini). Polish Journal of Entomology 82, 397403.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M. & Giłka, W. 2014. The oldest chironomids of the tribe Tanytarsini (Diptera: Chironomidae) indicate plesiomorphic character states. Geobios 47, 335–43.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M. & Giłka, W. 2015a. The Tanytarsini (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the collection of the Museum of Amber Inclusions, University of Gdańsk. Zootaxa 3946, 347–60.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M. & Giłka, W. 2015b. Eonandeva gen. nov., a new distinctive genus from Eocene Baltic amber (Diptera: Chironomidae). Zootaxa 4044, 577–84.Google Scholar
Zavřel, J. 1917. O dýchání a dýchacích ústrojích larev Chironomid. Rozpravy České Akademie Věd a Umění, Třída 2 (Mathematicko-Přírodnická) 26(3), 126.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, J. W. 1838. Dipterologis Scandinaviae. Sect. 3: Diptera. Insecta lapponica 1838, 477868.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov., adult male, holotype, BSIP Tad-607 a, early Eocene, 52–53 Ma, Tadkeshwar mine, Gujarat, India: (A) inclusion in amber; (B) habitus; (C) antenna (arrows indicate borders between flagellomeres, fm1–13); (D) wing.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov., adult male, holotype, BSIP Tad-607 a, early Eocene, 52–53 Ma, Tadkeshwar mine, Gujarat, India: (A) mid and hind leg (fe=femur; ti=tibia; ta1–5=tarsomeres 1–5 of mid leg; arrows indicate borders between leg segments); (B–E) tibiae and tibial armature of fore (B) and hind leg (C–E).

Figure 2

Table 1 Leg segment lengths (μm) and leg ratios of male Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov. Abbreviations: p1–p3=legs of pair 1–3; fe=femur; ti=tibia; ta1–ta5=tarsomeres 1–5; LR=leg ratio.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov., adult male, early Eocene, 52–53 Ma, Tadkeshwar mine, Gujarat, India: (A–C) paratype, BSIP Tad-607 b, hypopygium and its structures in dorsal (A–B) and lateral (C) aspects. (D–G) holotype, BSIP Tad-607 a, hypopygium and its structures in ventral aspect: (E) superior volsella, magnified ca.6 times relative to (D); (F) median volsella, magnified ca.3 times relative to (D); (G) median volsella, magnified ca.6 times relative to (D).

Figure 4

Table 2 Lengths of mid leg (μm), body (mm) and wing (μm) of male Gujaratomyia miripes gen. et sp. nov. and several comparable Eocene species of the tribe Tanytarsini.