Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T12:42:39.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential effects of α-helical and β-hairpin antimicrobial peptides against Acanthamoeba castellanii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

R. S. SACRAMENTO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Oftalmologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
R. M. MARTINS
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia, Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
A. MIRANDA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biofísica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
A. S. S. DOBROFF
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia, Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
S. DAFFRE
Affiliation:
Departamento de Parasitologia, Universidade São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
A. S. FORONDA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
D. DE FREITAS
Affiliation:
Departamento de Oftalmologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
S. SCHENKMAN*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia, Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu 862, 8A–04023-062, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Tel: +5511 55751996. E-mail: sschenkman@unifesp.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this work we evaluated the ability of different types of antimicrobial peptides to promote permeabilization and growth inhibition of Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites, which cause eye keratitis. We used cationic α-helical peptides P5 and P6, corresponding to the N-terminus of the pore-forming protein from Triatoma infestans, a blood-sucking insect, and a β-hairpin amphipathic molecule (gomesin), of the spider Acanthoscurria gomesiana haemocytes. A. castellanii permeabilization was obtained after 1 h incubation with micromolar concentrations of both types of peptides. While permeabilization induced by gomesin increased with longer incubations, P5 permeabilization did not increase with time and occurred at doses that are more toxic for SIRC cells. P5, however, at doses below the critical dose used to kill rabbit corneal cells was quite effective in promoting growth inhibition. Similarly, P5 was more effective when serine protease inhibitor was added simultaneously to the permeabilization assay. High performance chromatography followed by mass spectrometry analysis confirmed that, in contrast to gomesin, P5 is hydrolysed by A. castellanii culture supernatants. We conclude that the use of antimicrobial peptides to treat A. castellanii infections requires the search of more specific peptides that are resistant to proteolysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

INTRODUCTION

Acanthamoeba castellanii is a free-living protozoan that dwells in different habitats. It is found in 2 morphological stages: the mobile trophozoite and the encapsulated cyst. Pathogenesis by Acanthamoeba infection includes granulomatous amoebic meningoencephalitis, cutaneous acanthamebiasis, and the most common Acanthamoeba keratitis, affecting the cornea. Contact-lens wear is the main risk factor for infection. It causes infectious keratitis and can lead to severe ocular inflammation and loss of vision (Kashiwabuchi et al. Reference Kashiwabuchi, de Freitas, Alvarenga, Vieira, Contarini, Sato, Foronda and Hofling-Lima2008). The parasite attaches to mannose-rich glycoproteins from the host epithelium via a 136 kDa mannose-binding protein on the surface of trophozoites (Clarke and Niederkorn, Reference Clarke and Niederkorn2006a) and release several proteases that interfere with the host immune-response (Na et al. Reference Na, Cho, Song and Kim2002).

Clinically effective treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis emerged 20 years ago, and several antimicrobial compounds have been evaluated. Cationic antiseptic agents (polyhexametyl biguanide PHMB, chlorhexidine) and aromatic diamidines (hexamidine, propamidine isethionate), are the drugs of choice for keratitis and intensive topical treatment must be rigorously performed (hourly applications during the first 3 days) which may lead to toxicity and poor visual outcome (Gooi et al. Reference Gooi, Lee-Wing, Brownstein, El Defrawy, Jackson and Mintsioulis2008). These agents can cause allergic conjunctivitis, or toxic corneal epithelial erosions leading to chronic inflammation of the anterior segment of the eye. Moreover, the development of cataract, iris atrophy and refractory glaucoma during therapy has been attributed to drug-related side-effects (Herz et al. Reference Herz, Matoba and Wilhelmus2008).

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and cytolytic peptides participate in innate immunity and can be found as several invertebrate toxins (Kuhn-Nentwig, Reference Kuhn-Nentwig2003; Boman, Reference Boman2003; Bulet et al. Reference Bulet, Stocklin and Menin2004). They either target the plasma membrane causing its lysis, or affect intracellular components affecting cell physiology. They also modulate the immune system (Brown and Hancock, Reference Brown and Hancock2006). According to their secondary structure, they can be classified into α-helical (cecropins, magainins) and β-sheeted peptides (defensins, dermaseptins) (Brogden, Reference Brogden2005). AMPs secreted by the ocular surface are from the cathelicidin and defensin families being involved in immuneprotection against cornea infection processes (McIntosh et al. Reference McIntosh, Cade, Al Abed, Shanmuganathan, Gupta, Bhan, Tighe and Dua2005; Huang et al. Reference Huang, Jean, Proske, Reins and McDermott2007). It is notable that upon eye infection natural β-defensin expression is reduced (Abedin et al. Reference Abedin, Mohammed, Hopkinson and Dua2008). There are some reports describing the use of AMPs against A. castellanii (John et al. Reference John, Lin and Sahm1990; Feldman et al. Reference Feldman, Speaker and Cleveland1991; Schuster and Jacob, Reference Schuster and Jacob1992). For a review see Ondarza (Reference Ondarza2007). One important issue is that most of AMPs are sensitive to proteases and A. castellanii is known to secret large amounts of proteases (Dudley et al. Reference Dudley, Alsam and Khan2008).

In this study, we evaluated the potential use of 2 types of AMPs against A. castellanii. We employed α-helical and β-hairpin amphipathic peptides in permeabilization and growth assays of trophozoites. Peptides P5 and P6 fold in amphipathic α-helices and were derived respectively from amino acids 6–32 and 1–32 of the N-terminus of the pore-forming protein named trialysin, which is found in the saliva of the blood-sucking insect Triatoma infestans (Amino et al. Reference Amino, Martins, Procopio, Hirata, Juliano and Schenkman2002). These peptides were found to induce bacterial, and protozoal lysis at low concentrations compared to the concentration required to promote mammalian cell lysis (Martins et al. Reference Martins, Sforca, Amino, Juliano, Oyama, Juliano, Pertinhez, Spisni and Schenkman2006). Gomesin was employed as a model of a β-hairpin peptide. It is purified from haemocytes of the spider A. gomesiana displaying a large bacterial and fungal activity spectra (Silva, Jr. et al. Reference Silva, Daffre and Bulet2000; Mandard et al. Reference Mandard, Bulet, Caille, Daffre and Vovelle2002). It is stable in serum and resistant to proteolytic degradation due to 2 disulfide bonds (Fazio et al. Reference Fazio, Oliveira, Bulet, Miranda, Daffre and Miranda2006). It shows lytic activity against Plasmodium spp. (Moreira et al. Reference Moreira, Rodrigues, Ghosh, Varotti, Miranda, Daffre, Jacobs-Lorena and Moreira2007) and Cryptococcus neoformans (Barbosa et al. Reference Barbosa, Daffre, Maldonado, Miranda, Nimrichter and Rodrigues2007). We found that both types of peptides induced A. castellanii permeabilization and that proteases secreted by the protozoan impair the effect of the helical peptides, but not of the β-hairpin gomesin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Amoeba strain and trophozoite harvesting

An axenic culture of A. castellanii (ATCC 30011) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in 25 cm2 tissue-culture flasks containing 5 ml of modified Neff medium (Neff, Reference Neff1957) (2·0% peptone, 2·0% yeast extract, 1·8% glucose, 0·1 m sodium chloride, 1 mm sodium phosphate, and 1 mm calcium chloride, pH 6·8) at 25°C. Trophozoites from logarithmic-phase cultures were collected for the experiments 72–96 h post-inoculum. Culture flasks were gently washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in order to remove non-adherent trophozoites and cysts. Adherent cells were harvested by mechanical agitation. Washed amoebae were suspended in PBS or modified Neff medium, counted in a Neubauer haemocytometer and adjusted to the suitable final concentration.

Mammalian cell culture

The immortalized rabbit corneal cell (Statens Seruminstitut Rabbit Cornea, SIRC) line was obtained from the Rio de Janeiro Cell Bank (ATCC CCL60). The SIRC cells were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, non-essential amino acids, 100 U of penicillin/ml, and 100 μg streptomycin/ml.

Permeabilization assay

The synthesis and purification of peptides were previously described for P5 and P6 (Martins et al. Reference Martins, Sforca, Amino, Juliano, Oyama, Juliano, Pertinhez, Spisni and Schenkman2006) and for gomesin (Fazio et al. Reference Fazio, Oliveira, Bulet, Miranda, Daffre and Miranda2006). They were diluted in PBS before use and their concentrations were determined by amino acid analysis. Permeabilization experiments were carried out in 1·5 ml tubes. Twenty μl of trophozoites were resuspended in PBS (1×106 trophozoites/ml) and incubated with 20 μl of serial dilutions of each peptide for 1 and 4 h at 25°C. After adding 100 μl PBS, tubes were centrifuged at 800 g for 3 min, the supernatant removed and the pellet was stained by addition of 40 μl of 0·4% trypan blue solution (Sigma) diluted with the same volume of PBS. Cells were observed by using a light microscope. The percentage of permeabilized cells was determined by counting stained and non-stained cells in at least 100 cells (see Fig. 1A and B). All experiments were conducted in triplicate and repeated 3 times.

Fig. 1. Permeabilization assays of Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites induced by gomesin. Trypan blue exclusion (A and B) and flow cytometric analyses (C and D) of control A. castellanii trophozoites (A and C) or trophozoites incubated with 25 μm gomesin for 1 h at 25°C (B and D). Trophozoites stained with trypan blue appear in dark (arrows). Magnification bar=20 μm. Flow cytometry identified 2 cell populations, M1 and M2. Panel (E) shows A. castellanii permeabilization by different concentrations of gomesin measured by trypan blue staining (○) or by PI staining (▴). In both cases the permeabilization was considered as the ratio of labelled (M2) vs unlabelled amoeba (M1). Similar results were obtained in 3 different experiments.

Trophozoite permeabilization was also assessed by flow cytometry analysis after incorporation of propidium iodide (PI) on lysed cells as described previously (Borazjani et al. Reference Borazjani, May, Noble, Avery and Ahearn2000). Trophozoites were exposed to AMPs as indicated above, washed twice with PBS and resuspended in PBS (400 μl) containing 25 μg of PI/ml. Live amoebae and heat-killed amoebae (90°C for 20 min) stained with PI were used as negative and positive controls respectively. The cell samples were analysed in a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ), using CellQuest software.

Permeabilization assays were also carried out in the presence of 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), which inhibits serine proteases. Trophozoites were pre-incubated with PMSF 5 min prior to addition of AMPs.

Effects of AMPs on amoeba growth

Assays were carried out in 96-well plates as described by Mattana et al. (Reference Mattana, Biancu, Alberti, Accardo, Delogu, Fiori and Cappuccinelli2004). Briefly, 1×103 trophozoites were resuspended in 100 μl of modified Neff medium. Then 100 μl of serially diluted peptides in modified Neff medium were added to each well. Plates were maintained at 25°C for 7 days and daily monitored for amoeba growth at 200× magnification by using an inverted microscope equipped with a CCD camera. Six fields of each well were photographed, and the mean number of trophozoites per field was determined. All experiments were conducted in duplicate and repeated 3 times.

SIRC cytotoxicity assay

Exponentially growing SIRC cells (1×104) were seeded onto a 96-well plate containing 200 μl of DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and grown overnight at 37°C prior to exposure to AMP. After 24 h, the medium was removed, and serial dilutions of peptides in 50 μl of medium were added to the wells. After 4 h incubation, the medium was removed, and fresh medium containing 0·5 mg of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma)/ml was added to each well. Cells were incubated for another 4 h and then, 100 μl of 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate in 0·01 m HCl were added and the plates incubated at 37°C. Following overnight incubation, absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Fisher Biotech BT 2000, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The percentage of cell cytotoxicity was estimated by the equation:

\eqalign{\tab{\rm Cytotoxicity\ percentage} \equals \cr \tab \quad\left( {1 \minus {{A_{\setnum{570}\,{\rm peptide}} \minus A_{\setnum{570}\,{\rm medium}} } \over {A_{\setnum{570}\,{\rm cells}} \minus A_{\setnum{570}\,{\rm medium}} }}} \right) \times 100\cr}

Absorbance at 570 nm (A570) was recorded in the presence of each peptide, medium, or the cells alone.

HPLC/MS detection of peptides

Trophozoites (1×106) were diluted in 1 ml of PBS. After 12 h at 25°C, amoebae were removed by centrifugation and the supernatant incubated for 1 h with gomesin or P5 at 25°C. Control samples corresponded to peptides incubated in PBS. The samples were lyophilized and resuspended in 0·1% trifluoroacetic acid and then fractionated by HPLC (Waters Alliance, model 2690, Waters Corporations, Milford, MA, USA) attached to a mass spectrometer (Waters/Micromass instrument, model ZMD). Data were obtained using a Waters Nova-Pak C18 column (2·2×150 mm, 3·5 μm particle size, 60 Å pore size). For the LC step, elution was performed using a linear gradient of acidified CH3CN from 3% to 57% in 30 min at a flow rate of 0·4 ml/min. Absorbance was measured between 191 and 400 nm using a Waters photodiode array detector model 996. Mass measurements were performed in a positive mode in the following conditions: mass range between 500 and 3930 m/z; nitrogen gas flow: 4·1 L per h; needle: 4 kV; cone voltage: 35 V; source heater: 140°C; solvent heater: 400°C.

RESULTS

P5 and gomesin permeabilized A. castellanii trophozoites

A. castellanii trophozoites were incubated for 1 h with different amounts of gomesin and the number of cells stained by trypan blue (Niederkorn et al. Reference Niederkorn, Ubelaker, McCulley, Stewart, Meyer, Mellon, Silvany, He, Pidherney, Martin and Alizadeh1992) and by PI (Borazjani et al. Reference Borazjani, May, Noble, Avery and Ahearn2000). In the presence of gomesin a significant number of cells was stained with trypan blue compared to control trophozoites (Fig. 1A and B). Similarly a large proportion of cells (M2) was stained by PI, as visualized by flow cytometry, when the peptide was added (Fig. 1C and D). Quantitative measurements of the proportion of the cells labelled by the two methods were very similar (Fig. 1E) and suggest that both dyes detect permeable cells. As the trypan blue staining is more convenient to be performed routinely we adopted this method throughout this study.

Next the trophozoites were incubated with peptides P5, P6 and gomesin for 1 and 4 h. As shown in Fig. 2, after 1 h incubation gomesin permeabilized the cells at lower concentrations when compared to P5 and P6. The concentrations causing 50% cell permeabilization (PC50) were 34±5 μm for P5, 59±6 μm for P6 and 23±3 μm for gomesin. Increasing the incubation time to 4 h enhanced the gomesin effect, decreasing the PC50 to 13±3 μm, while it did not affect P5 and P6 activity.

Fig. 2. Permeabilization of Acanthamoeba castellanii by different AMPs. Trophozoites were incubated with different P5 (A), P6 (B) or gomesin (C) concentrations for 1 h (closed symbols) or 4 h (empty symbols) at 25°C and stained by trypan blue dye. Cells were counted in a Neubauer haemocytometer under light microscopy. Values are means±standard deviations of 3 independent experiments.

P5 is more toxic to corneal cells than gomesin

The effects of P5 and gomesin were assessed on rabbit corneal cells (SIRC) because A. castellanii is a major ophthalmological problem. Peptides were added to the cells and the toxicity was examined by MTT assay. Both were toxic to SIRC cells (PC50 for P5=22±3 μm, and for gomesin=26±5 μm), as seen in Fig. 3. As gomesin is more effective against the amoeba, it yields a safety index of 2 vs a safety index of 0·6 for P5. The safety index is the ratio between the PC50 of the peptide against the host cell (in this case, SIRC cells) and the PC50 of the same peptide against the target cell (trophozoites). The results therefore suggest that only gomesin-like peptides could be suitable for the treatment of A. castellanii ocular infections.

Fig. 3. Effect of AMPs on SIRC cells. The cells were incubated with different concentrations of P5 (○) and gomesin (□) for 4 h at 37°C. The cytotoxicity was determined as described in methods section and the values correspond to means±standard deviations of triplicate experiments.

P5, P6, and gomesin affect amoeba growth

We next investigated whether the peptides also affected trophozoite growth. For this, 1×103 amoebae were seeded in the presence of different concentrations of peptides and growth was followed for 6 days. Surprisingly, peptide P5 and even P6 were more effective in preventing A. castellanii growth. P5, up to 7 μm, was capable of totally inhibiting trophozoite multiplication while the same effect could only be obtained at 64 μm gomesin (Fig. 4). Although this result may be considered controversial, it can be explained by the lower number of trophozoites used to follow growth, and the amount of secreted proteases, as explained in the next section. To start the cultures, 103 cells/ml were used, while 2×104 amoebae/ml were used in the permeabilization assays.

Fig. 4. Effect of AMPs on Acanthamoeba castellanii growth. Trophozoites were resuspended in modified Neff medium and maintained at 25°C with various concentrations of P5 (A); P6 (B) and gomesin (C) in a 96-well plate for up to 6 days. Six fields from each well were photographed daily to determine the mean number of live trophozoites per field. Peptide concentrations (μm) are indicated at each curve.

P5 and P6, but not gomesin permeabilization increased in the presence of a serine-protease inhibitor

One explanation for the difference in the effective concentration required to permeabilize amoebae versus the concentration required to prevent growth might be due to peptide degradation by proteases secreted by A. castellanii known to be involved in adherence and tissue invasion (Na et al. Reference Na, Cho, Song and Kim2002; Kim et al. Reference Kim, Kong, Ha, Hong, Jeong, Yu and Chung2006; Sissons et al. Reference Sissons, Alsam, Goldsworthy, Lightfoot, Jarroll and Khan2006; Dudley et al. Reference Dudley, Alsam and Khan2008). The secreted proteases are serine proteases sensitive to PMSF. Therefore, trophozoites were pre-incubated with PMSF for 5 min prior to exposure to AMPs. After 1 h incubation, the permeabilization of trophozoites was assessed by the trypan blue assay. As shown in Fig. 5, PMSF only increased P5 and P6 activity, while the effect of gomesin remained the same. This result suggests that PMSF acts by inhibiting degradation of P5.

Fig. 5. Effect of a serine-protease inhibitor on Acanthamoeba castellanii permeabilization. Trophozoites were resuspended in PBS (1×106 per ml) and pre-treated with 1 mm PMSF (○) or without it (•) for 5 min before addition of P5 (A); P6 (B) and gomesin (C) and incubated for 1 h at 25°C. Permeabilization was determined by the trypan blue assay.

To verify whether P5 was in fact sensitive to proteases released by the trophozoites, P5 and gomesin were incubated with the supernatant of trophozoites cultures for 5 h and the samples analysed by HPLC/MS. The peak corresponding to P5 seen in the sample incubated in medium alone (Fig. 6A) disappeared after incubation with the trophozoites supernatant (Fig. 6B). On the other hand, the gomesin peak did not change (Fig. 6C and D), indicating that the secreted serine proteases only degrade P5 and P6.

Fig. 6. Acanthamoeba castellanii supernatants degrade P5 but not gomesin. Cell culture supernatants were incubated with P5 or gomesin and submitted to reverse phase HPLC. Chromatogram peaks had their compositions analysed by MS (not shown). (A and C) synthetic P5 and gomesin respectively in PBS; (B and D) P5 and gomesin incubated with trophozoites supernatants respectively.

DISCUSSION

Here we showed that AMPs from distinct structural groups are capable of interfering with growth and cellular permeability of A. castellanii trophozoites. Gomesin, a β-hairpin amphipathic peptide, known to be resistant to proteases is quite effective in permeabilizing trophozoites, compared to mammalian cells. In contrast, peptides corresponding to trialysin that form amphipathic α-helices are only more effective when proteases are inhibited, i.e. at low amoeba densities or in the presence of protease inhibitors. It is likely that gomesin resistance to proteases is due to its rigid structure, stabilized by 2 disulfide bonds (Fazio et al. Reference Fazio, Oliveira, Bulet, Miranda, Daffre and Miranda2006). Conversely, the structural flexibility of the α-helical P5 and P6 (from random structure in water solution to α-helices in the presence of membrane-mimetic agents) confers the susceptibility to protease degradation in the culture medium (Martins et al. Reference Martins, Sforca, Amino, Juliano, Oyama, Juliano, Pertinhez, Spisni and Schenkman2006).

These conclusions are based on the results showing that differently from gomesin, A. castellanii permeability is not increased at longer incubation times with P5 and P6, and that addition of PMSF increased their lytic effect. The hypothesis that PMSF renders the cells more susceptible to α-helical peptides was excluded by the observation that trophozoites pre-incubated with PMSF were not more susceptible to lysis induced by P5, or P6, than untreated ones. Moreover, degradation of P5 by culture supernatants of A. castellanii was also clearly seen for P5, but not for gomesin.

The increased ability of P5/P6, compared to gomesin, to block the growth of trophozoites can also be explained by the fact that there were fewer cells in the assay producing proteases, probably increasing the time for the former peptides to exert their actions. More importantly, this result also indicates that permeabilization induced by P5, and to a less extent by gomesin, also produces cell damage since both decrease growth. We cannot exclude, however, that P5-induced growth arrest could be unrelated to cell permeabilization, as measured by trypan blue staining. Some intracellular targets could also be affected by P5. Nevertheless, gomesin affects both growth and permeability suggesting that these processes are linked to each other.

Proteases secreted by A. castellanii trophozoites have been found to play important roles in infection (Clarke and Niederkorn, Reference Clarke and Niederkorn2006b) and are associated with cytopathic effects on mammalian cells (Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Pidherney, Alizadeh and Niederkorn1995). Importantly, A. castellanii infection decreases the amount of DEFB-109, an ocular defensin, which could favour parasite survival (Abedin et al. Reference Abedin, Mohammed, Hopkinson and Dua2008). Whether proteolytical degradation is involved in this process should be further investigated. In fact, proteolysis of AMPs has been found in other parasites. For example, AMP-mediated death is circumvented by proteases localized at the surface of Leishmania major (Kulkarni et al. Reference Kulkarni, McMaster, Kamysz, Kamysz, Engman and McGwire2006).

Treatments used for keratitis caused by A. castellani employ very toxic compounds even for SIRC cells. For example, chlorhexidine gluconate which is used at 0·02% (can be used up to 0·06%) kills SIRC cells in less than 4 min (Xuguang et al. Reference Xuguang, Yanchuang, Feng, Shiyun and Xiaotang2006). Also, the in vitro effects do not correlate with the clinical outcome. In some cases very toxic drugs provide satisfactory results in no more than 50% of the patients (Perez-Santonja et al. Reference Perez-Santonja, Kilvington, Hughes, Tufail, Matheson and Dart2003). It is also important to note that biguanides are used at very high concentrations in patients, although lower concentrations are effective in vitro for polyhexamethylene biguanide. In this case toxicity is very high for SIRC cells (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Oum, Choi, Yu and Lee2007). Therefore, although the AMPs used here presented some in vitro toxicity to rabbit corneal cells, our results suggest that the association of AMP treatment with specific protease inhibitors, or with drugs already being used to treat A. castellanii-infected patients should be further exploited. A similar use of gomesin associated with fluconazole has been proposed to treat cryptococcosis (Barbosa et al. Reference Barbosa, Daffre, Maldonado, Miranda, Nimrichter and Rodrigues2007).

The authors thank Claudio Rogerio de Oliveira for technical help. This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brazil.

References

REFERENCES

Abedin, A., Mohammed, I., Hopkinson, A. and Dua, H. S. (2008). A novel antimicrobial peptide on the ocular surface shows decreased expression in inflammation and infection. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 49, 2833. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amino, R., Martins, R. M., Procopio, J., Hirata, I. Y., Juliano, M. A. and Schenkman, S. (2002). Trialysin, a novel pore-forming protein from saliva of hematophagous insects activated by limited proteolysis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 62076213. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109874200.Google Scholar
Barbosa, F. M., Daffre, S., Maldonado, R. A., Miranda, A., Nimrichter, L. and Rodrigues, M. L. (2007). Gomesin, a peptide produced by the spider Acanthoscurria gomesiana, is a potent anticryptococcal agent that acts in synergism with fluconazole. FEMS Microbiology Letters 274, 279286. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109874200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boman, H. G. (2003). Antibacterial peptides: basic facts and emerging concepts. Journal of Internal Medicine 254, 197215. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01228.x.Google Scholar
Borazjani, R. N., May, L. L., Noble, J. A., Avery, S. V. and Ahearn, D. G. (2000). Flow cytometry for determination of the efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Acanthamoeba spp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66, 10571061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brogden, K. A. (2005). Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nature Reviews. Microbiology 3, 238250. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, K. L. and Hancock, R. E. (2006). Cationic host defense (antimicrobial) peptides. Current Opinion in Immunology 18, 2430. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2005.11.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulet, P., Stocklin, R. and Menin, L. (2004). Anti-microbial peptides: from invertebrates to vertebrates. Immunological Reviews 198, 169184. doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0124.x.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. W. and Niederkorn, J. Y. (2006 a). The immunobiology of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Microbes and Infection 8, 14001405. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2005.12.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, D. W. and Niederkorn, J. Y. (2006 b). The pathophysiology of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Trends in Parasitology 22, 175180. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2006.02.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudley, R., Alsam, S. and Khan, N. A. (2008). The role of proteases in the differentiation of Acanthamoeba castellanii. FEMS Microbiology Letters 286, 9–15. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01249.x.Google Scholar
Fazio, M. A., Oliveira, V. X. Jr., Bulet, P., Miranda, M. T., Daffre, S. and Miranda, A. (2006). Structure-activity relationship studies of gomesin: importance of the disulfide bridges for conformation, bioactivities, and serum stability. Biopolymers 84, 205218. doi:10.1002/bip.20396.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. T., Speaker, M. and Cleveland, P. (1991). Effect of magainins on Acanthamoeba castellanii. Review of Infectious Diseases 13 (Suppl 5), S439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gooi, P., Lee-Wing, M., Brownstein, S., El Defrawy, S., Jackson, W. B. and Mintsioulis, G. (2008). Acanthamoeba keratitis: persistent organisms without inflammation after 1 year of topical chlorhexidine. Cornea 27, 246248. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31815b82a2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herz, N. L., Matoba, A. Y. and Wilhelmus, K. R. (2008). Rapidly progressive cataract and iris atrophy during treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology 115, 866869. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, L. C., Jean, D., Proske, R. J., Reins, R. Y. and McDermott, A. M. (2007). Ocular surface expression and in vitro activity of antimicrobial peptides. Current Eye Research 32, 595609. doi:10.1080/02713680701446653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, T., Lin, J. and Sahm, D. F. (1990). Acanthamoeba keratitis successfully treated with prolonged propamidine isethionate and neomycin-polymyxin-gramicidin. Annals of Ophthalmology 22, 2023.Google ScholarPubMed
Kashiwabuchi, R. T., de Freitas, D., Alvarenga, L. S., Vieira, L., Contarini, P., Sato, E., Foronda, A. and Hofling-Lima, A. L. (2008). Corneal graft survival after therapeutic keratoplasty for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Acta Ophthalmologica 86, 666669. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01086.x.Google Scholar
Kim, W. T., Kong, H. H., Ha, Y. R., Hong, Y. C., Jeong, H. J., Yu, H. S. and Chung, D. I. (2006). Comparison of specific activity and cytopathic effects of purified 33 kDa serine proteinase from Acanthamoeba strains with different degree of virulence. Korean Journal of Parasitology 44, 321330. doi:10.3347/kjp.2006.44.4.321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn-Nentwig, L. (2003). Antimicrobial and cytolytic peptides of venomous arthropods. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 60, 26512668. doi:10.1007/s00018-003-3106-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulkarni, M. M., McMaster, W. R., Kamysz, E., Kamysz, W., Engman, D. M. and McGwire, B. S. (2006). The major surface-metalloprotease of the parasitic protozoan, Leishmania, protects against antimicrobial peptide-induced apoptotic killing. Molecular Microbiology 62, 14841497. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05459.x.Google Scholar
Lee, J. E., Oum, B. S., Choi, H. Y., Yu, H. S. and Lee, J. S. (2007). Cysticidal effect on acanthamoeba and toxicity on human keratocytes by polyhexamethylene biguanide and chlorhexidine. Cornea 26, 736741. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31805b7e8e.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandard, N., Bulet, P., Caille, A., Daffre, S. and Vovelle, F. (2002). The solution structure of gomesin, an antimicrobial cysteine-rich peptide from the spider. European Journal of Biochemistry 269, 11901198. doi:10.1046/j.0014-2956.2002.02760.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, R. M., Sforca, M. L., Amino, R., Juliano, M. A., Oyama, S. Jr., Juliano, L., Pertinhez, T. A., Spisni, A. and Schenkman, S. (2006). Lytic activity and structural differences of amphipathic peptides derived from trialysin. Biochemistry 45, 17651774. doi:10.1021/bi0514515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattana, A., Biancu, G., Alberti, L., Accardo, A., Delogu, G., Fiori, P. L. and Cappuccinelli, P. (2004). In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of the macrolide rokitamycin and chlorpromazine against Acanthamoeba castellanii. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemoterapy 48, 45204527. doi:10.1128/AAC.48.12.4520-4527.2004.Google Scholar
McIntosh, R. S., Cade, J. E., Al Abed, M., Shanmuganathan, V., Gupta, R., Bhan, A., Tighe, P. J. and Dua, H. S. (2005). The spectrum of antimicrobial peptide expression at the ocular surface. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 46, 13791385. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0607.Google Scholar
Moreira, C. K., Rodrigues, F. G., Ghosh, A., Varotti, F. P., Miranda, A., Daffre, S., Jacobs-Lorena, M. and Moreira, L. A. (2007). Effect of the antimicrobial peptide gomesin against different life stages of Plasmodium spp. Experimental Parasitology 116, 346353. doi:10.1016/j.exppara.2007.01.022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Na, B. K., Cho, J. H., Song, C. Y. and Kim, T. S. (2002). Degradation of immunoglobulins, protease inhibitors and interleukin-1 by a secretory proteinase of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Korean Journal of Parasitology 40, 9399. doi:10.3347/kjp.2002.40.2.93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neff, R. J. (1957). Purification, axenic cultivation, and description of a soil amoeba, Acanthamoeba sp. Journal of Protozoology 4, 176182. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1957.tb.02505.xGoogle Scholar
Niederkorn, J. Y., Ubelaker, J. E., McCulley, J. P., Stewart, G. L., Meyer, D. R., Mellon, J. A., Silvany, R. E., He, Y. G., Pidherney, M., Martin, J. H. and Alizadeh, H. (1992). Susceptibility of corneas from various animal species to in vitro binding and invasion by Acanthamoeba castellanii. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 33, 104112.Google Scholar
Ondarza, R. N. (2007). Drug targets from human pathogenic amoebas: Entamoeba histolytica, Acanthamoeba polyphaga and Naegleria fowleri. Infectious Disorders Drug Targets 7, 266280. doi:10.2124/187152607782110059Google Scholar
Perez-Santonja, J. J., Kilvington, S., Hughes, R., Tufail, A., Matheson, M. and Dart, J. K. (2003). Persistently culture positive acanthamoeba keratitis: in vivo resistance and in vitro sensitivity. Ophthalmology 110, 15931600. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00481-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuster, F. L. and Jacob, L. S. (1992). Effects of magainins on ameba and cyst stages of Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemoterapy 36, 12631271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, P. I. Jr., Daffre, S. and Bulet, P. (2000). Isolation and characterization of gomesin, an 18-residue cysteine-rich defense peptide from the spider Acanthoscurria gomesiana hemocytes with sequence similarities to horseshoe crab antimicrobial peptides of the tachyplesin family. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 3346433470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sissons, J., Alsam, S., Goldsworthy, G., Lightfoot, M., Jarroll, E. L. and Khan, N. A. (2006). Identification and properties of proteases from an Acanthamoeba isolate capable of producing granulomatous encephalitis. BMC Microbiology 6, 42. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-6-42.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. M., Pidherney, M. S., Alizadeh, H. and Niederkorn, J. Y. (1995). In vitro characterization of Acanthamoeba castellanii cytopathic effect. Journal of Parasitology 81, 603609.Google Scholar
Xuguang, S., Yanchuang, L., Feng, Z., Shiyun, L. and Xiaotang, Y. (2006). Pharmacokinetics of chlorhexidine gluconate 0·02% in the rabbit cornea. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 22, 227230. doi:10.1089/jop.2006.22.227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Permeabilization assays of Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites induced by gomesin. Trypan blue exclusion (A and B) and flow cytometric analyses (C and D) of control A. castellanii trophozoites (A and C) or trophozoites incubated with 25 μm gomesin for 1 h at 25°C (B and D). Trophozoites stained with trypan blue appear in dark (arrows). Magnification bar=20 μm. Flow cytometry identified 2 cell populations, M1 and M2. Panel (E) shows A. castellanii permeabilization by different concentrations of gomesin measured by trypan blue staining (○) or by PI staining (▴). In both cases the permeabilization was considered as the ratio of labelled (M2) vs unlabelled amoeba (M1). Similar results were obtained in 3 different experiments.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Permeabilization of Acanthamoeba castellanii by different AMPs. Trophozoites were incubated with different P5 (A), P6 (B) or gomesin (C) concentrations for 1 h (closed symbols) or 4 h (empty symbols) at 25°C and stained by trypan blue dye. Cells were counted in a Neubauer haemocytometer under light microscopy. Values are means±standard deviations of 3 independent experiments.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Effect of AMPs on SIRC cells. The cells were incubated with different concentrations of P5 (○) and gomesin (□) for 4 h at 37°C. The cytotoxicity was determined as described in methods section and the values correspond to means±standard deviations of triplicate experiments.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Effect of AMPs on Acanthamoeba castellanii growth. Trophozoites were resuspended in modified Neff medium and maintained at 25°C with various concentrations of P5 (A); P6 (B) and gomesin (C) in a 96-well plate for up to 6 days. Six fields from each well were photographed daily to determine the mean number of live trophozoites per field. Peptide concentrations (μm) are indicated at each curve.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Effect of a serine-protease inhibitor on Acanthamoeba castellanii permeabilization. Trophozoites were resuspended in PBS (1×106 per ml) and pre-treated with 1 mm PMSF (○) or without it (•) for 5 min before addition of P5 (A); P6 (B) and gomesin (C) and incubated for 1 h at 25°C. Permeabilization was determined by the trypan blue assay.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Acanthamoeba castellanii supernatants degrade P5 but not gomesin. Cell culture supernatants were incubated with P5 or gomesin and submitted to reverse phase HPLC. Chromatogram peaks had their compositions analysed by MS (not shown). (A and C) synthetic P5 and gomesin respectively in PBS; (B and D) P5 and gomesin incubated with trophozoites supernatants respectively.