Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:37:02.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying Crucial Equipment and Skills Needed to Evacuate Critically Ill Infants During Disasters: Using Nursing Expertise to Guide Training Targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2019

Megan M. Gray*
Affiliation:
University of Washington and Seattle Children’s Hospital, Division of Neonatology, Seattle, WashingtonUSA
Anita A. Thomas
Affiliation:
University of Washington and Seattle Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Seattle, WashingtonUSA
Brian Burns
Affiliation:
Seattle Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Seattle, WashingtonUSA
Rachel A. Umoren
Affiliation:
University of Washington and Seattle Children’s Hospital, Division of Neonatology, Seattle, WashingtonUSA
*
Correspondence: Megan M. Gray, MD Seattle Children’s Hospital Division of Neonatology Mail Stop FA.2.113, PO Box 5371 Seattle, Washington 98145 USA, E-mail: Graym1@uw.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Unexpected disasters, such as earthquakes or fires, require preparation to address knowledge gaps that may negatively affect vulnerable patients. Training programs can promote natural disaster readiness to respond and evacuate patients safely, but also require evidence-based information to guide learning objectives.

Problem:

There is limited evidence on what skills and bedside equipment are most important to include in disaster training and evacuation programs for critically ill infants.

Methods:

An expert panel was used to create a 13-item mastery checklist of skills for bedside registered nurses (RNs) required to successfully evacuate a critically ill infant. Expert nurses were surveyed, and the Angoff method was used to determine which of the mastery checklist skills a newly graduated nurse (ie, the “minimally competent” nurse) should be able to do. Participants then rated the importance of 26 commonly available pieces of bedside equipment for use in evacuating a hemodynamically unstable, intubated infant during a disaster.

Results:

Twenty-three emergency department (ED) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) charge RNs responded to the survey with a mean of 19 (SD = 9) years of experience and 30% reporting personal experience with evacuating patients. The skills list scores showed an emphasis on the newly graduated nurse having more complete mastery of skills surrounding thermoregulation, documentation, infection control, respiratory support, and monitoring. Skills for communication, decision making, and anticipating future needs were assessed as less likely for a new nurse to have mastered. On a scale of one (not important) to seven (critically important), the perceived necessity of equipment ranged from a low of 1.6 (breast pump) to a high of 6.9 (face mask). The individual intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.55 showed moderate reliability between raters and the average team ICC of 0.97 showed excellent agreement as a group.

Conclusion:

Experts rated the ability to manage physiological issues, such as thermoregulation and respiratory support, as skills that every nurse should master. Disaster preparedness activities for nurses in training may benefit from checklists of essential equipment and skills to ensure all nurses can independently manage patients’ physiologic needs when they enter the workforce. Advanced nursing training should include education on decision making, communication during emergencies, and anticipation of future issues to ensure that charge and resource nurses can support bedside nurses during evacuation events.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2019 

Introduction

Unexpected natural disasters, such as earthquakes and fires, require preparation and planning to address knowledge gaps that may negatively affect vulnerable patients, such as the critically ill and infants. Major storms and wildfires have damaged key hospitals and have required neonatal patient evacuation.Reference Espiritu, Patil and Cruz 1 Reference Nagata, Himeno and Himeno 4 Safe evacuation under these circumstances requires a clear command structure, appropriate supplies and equipment, methods to assure situational awareness, regional coordination, and flexibility. 5 The unexpected nature of disasters means that there is an on-going need for disaster preparedness and training to promote readiness to respond to these types of disasters and evacuate critically ill infants safely. Effective training requires careful attention to learning objectives and tools to aid learners in achieving and maintaining their preparedness.

When compared to adults, infants have significant differences in physiology affecting their medical care due to their small size, difficulty with thermoregulation, variable drug metabolism, and the need for careful fluid management and respiratory support.Reference Polin, Fox and Abman 6 Such physiological differences are compounded by critical illness. Hospitalized infants are some of the most vulnerable patients in disaster situations, given their reliance on technology, unique medical equipment, and skilled medical staff for their unique care needs related to their size and delicate physiology.Reference Barfield and Krug 7 Thus, care of the critically ill infant is unique and requires specialized care, particularly in the event of a disaster.Reference Barfield and Krug 7 , Reference Mendlovic, Albukrek, Dagan, Merin and Weiser 8

Bedside registered nurses (RNs) are essential in the care of pediatric patients and represent the largest group of health care providers in the hospital at any given time of day, yet many feel unprepared to respond to disasters.Reference Labrague, Hammad and Gloe 9 , Reference Baack and Alfred 10 Nurses will be the front-line evacuators, with charge nurses providing valuable leadership in the event of a disaster; however, there is no established methodology, to the authors’ knowledge, to address these educational needs of bedside and charge nurses. The study goal was to utilize senior charge nurse expertise in the pediatric emergency department (ED) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to determine the evacuation skills that bedside nurses are required to independently manage during disasters, and to create an essential equipment checklist for evacuation of critically ill infants in order to inform future disaster training.

Methods

The Angoff method is a commonly used method for setting passing scores for learner evaluations, including clinical skill checklists.Reference Kardong-Edgren and Mulcock 11 For this study, a modified Angoff method was used to determine the expected performance of a minimally competent nurse carrying out an evacuation of a critically ill infant.Reference Kardong-Edgren and Mulcock 11 , Reference Barsuk, Cohen, Wayne, McGaghie and Yudkowsky 12 The minimally competent candidate for a specific level in the Angoff method is one who has all the minimal level of knowledge and skills necessary to perform the requirements of that level of practice completely and in a timely manner.Reference George, Haque and Oyebode 13 A panel of experts, consisting of nurses and physicians who provide care to critically ill infants, routinely supervise bedside nurses, and participate in local and regional disaster management clinical advisory committees, generated a mastery skills list for bedside nurses performing evacuations of critically ill patients during unanticipated disasters. A list of proposed skills was assembled from previous evacuation drills, as limited data exist in the literature around skills for bedside nurses. Proposed skills were chosen to cover the entire range of skills a mastery-level bedside nurse would be expected to perform during an evacuation. Content experts evaluated all proposed skills and agreed to accept, reject, or modify each skill. After two rounds of evaluation and modification, skills with complete agreement to accept were included in the mastery checklist. This process took place in April of 2017 and generated a total of 13 skills expected of a master-level nurse.

The final mastery skills checklist was made into a survey and sent to experienced charge nurses in the NICU and the ED in June of 2017. The anonymous survey was approved by the Seattle Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board (Seattle, Washington USA). For this study, the minimally competent nurse was described as a nurse who meets the minimum requirements for independent care of a patient in a unit, with the provided example of a newly graduated nurse who had just completed orientation. For each skill, the respondents were asked whether a newly graduated nurse would be able to complete the tasks correctly in a reasonable amount of time (score of two), complete some of the tasks correctly and/or take longer than reasonable to complete (score of one), or would not be expected to do the tasks correctly (score of zero).

Skills scores were averaged and tested for normalcy. Skills were ranked according to score, with higher mean scores rendered for skills expected of newly graduated nurses and lower mean scores for skills expected of more experienced nurses. The ranked skills were assembled into a simulation scoring tool with each item having a potential score from zero (tasks not performed or that required excess length of time to perform) to two (tasks able to be performed completely in a reasonable length of time). The sum of mean scores from the Angoff was used to set a passing cutoff score for the tool.

Commonly available bedside equipment was listed in the survey, and participants were asked to rate each item on a Likert-type scale from one (not important) to seven (critically important). Scores were averaged to obtain means, and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The ICC estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using STATA statistical package version 14 (Stata Corp; College Station, Texas USA). The ICC values were calculated for both individual raters and the group of raters based on a mean-rating (k = 23), consistency, two-way random-effects model.

Results

Six experts participated in this iterative method to determine which skills and tasks were necessary for a bedside nurse to successfully evacuate and care for a critically ill infant in a disaster. Thirteen skills had >90% agreement and were included in the final list used for the survey questions, with four skills concerning managing physiologic considerations, four regarding documentation/identification, two around communications, and three addressing decision making/anticipation. The experts found 26 commonly available bedside equipment items that would be likely to be present in the room of a critically ill infant and included these in the survey questions on equipment importance.

Twenty-three of the ED and NICU charge RNs completed the survey with a response rate of 82% (23/28). Among respondents, there was a mean of 19 (SD = 9) years of experience, with 30% reporting personal experience with evacuating patients (Table 1). Content experts rated their bedside nursing group’s readiness to evacuate patients during disasters as low, with a mean of 41% (SD = 26%) out of potential score of 100% presently ready.

Table 1. Demographics of Survey Respondents

The skills list scores showed an emphasis on the newly graduated nurse having more complete mastery of skills surrounding managing physiologic considerations such as thermoregulation, infection control, respiratory support, and monitoring vital signs. Skills around ensuring appropriate documentation and patient identification, including tasks specific to reunification efforts, had more moderate scores. Skills for communication, decision making, and anticipating future needs were assessed as less likely for a newly graduated nurse to be able to perform (Table 2). The skills were assembled in the ranked order by mean expert scores and the Evacuating Scoring Tool (EVAT) was created (Figure 1). The sum of the mean scores was 18 out of a potential of 26 possible on the EVAT (69%), which established the minimum passing score for the tool.

Table 2. Mastery Checklist for Newly Graduated Nurse with Categorization of Skills

Abbreviation: SBAR, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation.

a Score range of two (expected newly graduated nurse to perform perfectly) to zero (not expected to perform tasks complete or in reasonable time).

Figure 1. Evacuation Assessment Tool (EVAT) for Scoring Evacuation Simulations.

Abbreviation: SBAR, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation.

The equipment ratings revealed opinions regarding the importance of various items during an evacuation; these showed a range in scores from 6.91 (most important) for a face mask for bagging to 1.64 (least important) for a breast pump for the patient’s mother. There was a wide-range in variability in some individual items’ scoring with standard deviations up to maximum of two points for the personal protective face mask. Equipment of similar scores was grouped into categories by score ranges (Table 3). The individual ICC of 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.44-0.68) showed moderate agreement between raters, and the average team ICC of 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98) showed excellent agreement as a group (F [35.0, 770.0] = 29.38; P <.0001).

Table 3. Ratings of Bedside Equipment for Patients Requiring Evacuation during a Disaster

Abbreviations: ID, identification; IV, intravenous.

Discussion

This study of experienced ED and NICU nurses identified the primary skills and equipment required for management of infants in disaster situations requiring evacuation. The basic nursing skills that were identified as expected for all bedside nurses in disaster situations concerned maintaining physiologic processes including thermoregulation, avoiding infection, respiratory support, and monitoring vital signs. These skills are critical because infants have poor physiological regulation. World-wide, hypothermia is a contributing factor in all the major causes of neonatal mortality, including neonatal asphyxia and infection.Reference Lunze, Bloom, Jamison and Hamer 14 During evacuation, critically ill infants may require close monitoring of their respiratory effort due to the risk for apneic events that would go undetected, leading to respiratory compromise.Reference Dysart, Miller, Wolfson and Shaffer 15

Skills for communication, decision making, and anticipating future needs are crucial for care of infants in these situations, but these skills were assessed as less likely for a newly graduated nurse to have mastered. These skills should be educational targets for the more senior or charge nurses. While nurses with varying levels of experience may be involved in evacuating infants in the setting of a disaster, most units will have at least one more senior or charge nurse present per shift who can share their knowledge and perform the higher-level skills for a larger group of nurses. As an example, a well-prepared charge nurse can use their communication skills to lead a huddle to communicate information on the situation, explain expectations for bedside nurses as they prepare to evacuate, make decisions on environmental safety, anticipate potential safety issues for the group, and make preparations such as bringing a code medication kit.

Simulations involving evacuations and disasters provide valuable opportunities for nurses to practice these vital skills. The equipment and skills discussed in this study can be used both to design learning objectives for disaster training exercises and to evaluate simulation performance. The EVAT scoring tool provides a method for evaluating performance during evacuation simulations, and the cutoff score for passing can be used to ensure newly graduated nurses are meeting the competencies expected of them.

Disaster preparedness activities for nurses may benefit from checklists of essential equipment and skills to ensure all nurses can independently manage patients’ physiologic needs during an emergency. The development and use of an equipment prioritization checklist and skill set using the strategies outlined in this study is feasible for any specialty or unit. The pre-emptive identification of necessary equipment and the availability of evacuation checklists can enable prompt evacuation with critical equipment, and it may also assist adequate preparation and stocking of this equipment at receiving facilities who may receive evacuated patients without essential equipment.

Limitations

The study had several limitations. It was conducted at a single facility, and the results may not be applicable to other facilities with different or limited resources; however, the methodology used to generate the ranked list of equipment and skills could be used by any facility to create their own list. Past performance and candidate data are not available to validate the cutoff point, but a future study is underway to ensure an expected percentage of practicing nurses obtain passing scores with the cutoff point determined with the Angoff method. This method relies on expert opinion and is subject to biases that could result in under- or over-valuing certain equipment or skills. The individual ICC for this study showed only moderate agreement, potentially due to a lack of training phase or quantitative feedback on individual versus group ratings. Future iterations of the equipment rating may benefit from rater feedback to increase agreement, potentially via a two-phase Delphi or a training phase on a subset of items if a smaller team of raters is to be used to represent the group. Alternatively, a large team of raters should be used to rate all items in order to obtain the high average consistency.

Conclusion

Experts rated the ability to manage physiologic issues, such as thermoregulation and respiratory support, as disaster management skills that every nurse should master. Disaster preparedness activities for nurses in training may benefit from checklists of essential equipment and skills to ensure all nurses can independently manage patients’ physiologic needs when they enter the workforce. Disaster training for advanced or charge nurses should include education on decision making, communication during emergencies, and anticipation of future issues to ensure that charge and resource nurses can support bedside nurses during evacuation events. Nurses participating in simulated evacuation events can have their performance scored on the EVAT to determine whether they have met the minimum expected performance in caring for patients in disasters requiring evacuation, and to identify skills to improve upon as they advance.

Conflicts of interest

none

References

Espiritu, M, Patil, U, Cruz, H, et al . Evacuation of a neonatal intensive care unit in a disaster: lessons from Hurricane Sandy. Pediatrics. 2014;134(6):e16621669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanDevanter, N, Raveis, VH, Kovner, CT, McCollum, M, Keller, R. Challenges and resources for nurses participating in a Hurricane Sandy hospital evacuation. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017;49(6):635643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, MA, Dorfman, MV, Einav, S, Niven, AS, Kissoon, N, Grissom, CK. Evacuation of intensive care units during disaster: learning from the Hurricane Sandy experience. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(1):2027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagata, T, Himeno, S, Himeno, A, et al. Successful hospital evacuation after the Kumamoto Earthquakes, Japan, 2016. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(5):517521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FEMA Incident Command System. 2008. FEMA.gov. Accessed December 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Polin, RA, Fox, WF, Abman, SH. Fetal and Neonatal Physiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA: Elsevier, Inc.; 2004:765781.Google Scholar
Barfield, WD, Krug, S. Committee on fetus and newborn & disaster preparedness in neonatal intensive care units: disaster preparedness in neonatal intensive care units. Pediatrics. 2017;139(5):e1e11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendlovic, J, Albukrek, D, Dagan, D, Merin, O, Weiser, G. Improvised neonatal care—realizing the gaps in a disaster zone. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(1):111113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labrague, LJ, Hammad, K, Gloe, DS, et al. Disaster preparedness among nurses: a systematic review of literature. Int Nurs Rev. 2018;65(1):4153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baack, S, Alfred, D. Nurses’ preparedness and perceived competence in managing disasters. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013;45(3):281287.Google ScholarPubMed
Kardong-Edgren, S, Mulcock, PM. Angoff method of setting cut scores for high-stakes testing: Foley catheter checkoff as an exemplar. Nurse Educ. 2016;41(2):8082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsuk, JH, Cohen, ER, Wayne, DB, McGaghie, WC, Yudkowsky, RA. Comparison of approaches for mastery learning standard setting. Acad Med. 2018;93(7):10791084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, S, Haque, MS, Oyebode, F. Standard setting: comparison of two methods. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunze, K, Bloom, DE, Jamison, DT, Hamer, DH. The global burden of neonatal hypothermia: systematic review of a major challenge for newborn survival. BMC Med. 2013;11:24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dysart, K, Miller, TL, Wolfson, MR, Shaffer, TH. Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med. 2009;103(10):14001405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographics of Survey Respondents

Figure 1

Table 2. Mastery Checklist for Newly Graduated Nurse with Categorization of Skills

Figure 2

Figure 1. Evacuation Assessment Tool (EVAT) for Scoring Evacuation Simulations.Abbreviation: SBAR, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation.

Figure 3

Table 3. Ratings of Bedside Equipment for Patients Requiring Evacuation during a Disaster