Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T14:42:01.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compositional study of prehistoric pigments (Carriqueo rock shelter, Argentina) by synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

Cristina Vázquez*
Affiliation:
Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Buenos Aires, Argentina andUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Oscar Martín Palacios
Affiliation:
CIAFIC, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Larysa Darchuk
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, UIA, Antwerp, Belgium
Lué-Merú Marcó Parra
Affiliation:
Dpto. Química y Suelos, Decanato de Agronomía, Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado, Barquisimeto, Venezuela
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: vazquez@cnea.gov.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this work synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction technique was successfully applied for the analysis of pigments found in excavation at Carriqueo rock shelter, Neuquén, Argentina. The pigment samples of orange, red, and brown shades were collected from different levels of this archaeological site and compared with a suspected source of provenance (La Oficina creek). X-ray diffraction patterns of several yellowish, reddish, and red pigments showed the presence of haematite, goethite, kaolinite, and quartz. The majority of Carriqueo collected samples belonged to the same group of the suspected source, having haematite and quartz as main crystalline phases. The results indicate that the raw material from La Oficina is the source of most of the pigments found at Carriqueo. The present work helps us to understand the strategy of supplying raw materials by human groups in the North Patagonia region.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

I. INTRODUCTION

Natural earths have been used as colour pigments since prehistoric times. They have been detected in works of art everywhere and in any historical period probably due to their availability, high colouring capacities, and stabilities to light and a variety of weather conditions. Ochres are natural earth pigments varying from yellow to red and brown shades. The colour shade of ochre depends on the type of the iron oxide chromophore. The red ochres contain mainly haematite (Fe2O3), while the yellowish ochres are rich in hydrated iron oxide (goethite, FeO·OH) (Cornell and Schwertmann, Reference Cornell and Schwertmann1996; Helwig, Reference Helwig1997, Reference Helwig and Berrie2007; Fiore et al., Reference Fiore, Maier, Parera, Orquera and Piana2008).

Most often the red ochre was detected as a main component of rock paintings and human funerals (Mortimore et al., Reference Mortimore, Marshall, Almond, Hollins and Matthews2004; Bikiaris et al., Reference Bikiaris, Daniilia, Sotiropoulou, Katsimbiri, Pavlidou, Moutsatsou and Chryssoulakis2000). Red colour plays an important role in human behavior. Studies and opinions on the mechanisms of colour preference can be found in such fields as anthropology, psychology, and linguistics (Leach, Reference Leach1976). The presence of other minerals, such as clay minerals or metal oxides, can also influence the colour of the ochres. It is well known that clay materials and iron oxides were adopted as mineral pigments along the history (Hradil et al., Reference Hradil, Grygar, Hradilová and Bezdička2003). They were used for ethnic or social marks expressed as rock art, burial ceremonies, paintings or engravings, and also body paintings or exhibition of adornments or sumptuary objects such as engraved plates. The marks with colour, generally red, were not hidden but, on the contrary, there are evidences they were intentionally shown (Gradín et al., Reference Gradín, Aguerre and Albornoz2003; Albornoz, Reference Albornoz and Otero1996). To a large extent, red pigments were selected for rock paintings (Hajduk et al., Reference Hajduk, Albornoz, Lezcano, Civalero, Fernández and Guráieb2004; Podestá, Reference Podestá, Bahn and Fossati2003; Wainwright et al., Reference Wainwright, Helwig, Podestá and Bellelli2000). Red pigments were also found colouring valves of molluscs (British) or mollusks (American) (Diplodon patagonicus) intentionally or unintentionally (Parada and Peredo, Reference Parada and Peredo2008; Trubitt, Reference Trubitt2003; Bar-Yosef Mayer, Reference Bar-Yosef Mayer and Gopher1997).

Mineral pigment colours varying from yellow to red are given by the presence of different iron oxyhydroxides and oxides, mainly goethite and haematite.

Figure 1. Map of the site location (by Mabel Fernández).

Figure 2. (Color online) Flat view of Carriqueo shelter (by Luis Teira).

Their structural and mineralogical compositions are related with their natural genesis and provenance. Compositional characterization helps archaeologists and anthropologists to reconstruct ancient society life style as well as to hypothesize the group’s peculiar mobility and to infer different uses.

The purposes of this research were to determine the mineralogical compositions of prehistoric pigments from excavated layers collected at the Carriqueo rock shelter archaeological site and to compare them with a suspected provenance source, La Oficina. Carriqueo shelter (S 40°37′27″; W 70°31′42″; W ) is located on the west side of La Oficina creek, a tributary of the Limay river, Pilcaniyeu area, in the Río Negro province (Figure 1) (Palacios and Ramos, Reference Palacios and Ramos2009; Crivelli Montero et al., Reference Crivelli Montero, Cordero, Palacios and Ramos2007).

From an archaeological point of view, Carriqueo is a small specialized site with a doubtless hunting activity and, to a less extent, a sedentary living site (Crivelli Montero et al., Reference Crivelli Montero, Cordero, Palacios and Ramos2007). This area is also archaeologically related with other sites such as La Divisoria, a chert lithic manufacturing area located 350 m away on the other side of the creek. Several surface sites that seem to have been active at the same time in the neighborhoods had been detected. Radiocarbons analysis [14C] reveals two dates: 2620±110 BPand 610±50 BP. From November to December 2006, the archaeological Carriqueo shelter site was investigated (Crivelli Montero et al., Reference Crivelli Montero, Cordero, Palacios and Ramos2007). A flat view of this site is shown in Figure 2. During the excavations, several pigment samples, deposited in layers in the sedimentary pile, were collected.

Figure 3. (Color online) La Oficina site, suspected source of red pigments.

Figure 4. (Color online) Pigment sample sizes.

The environs of the Carriqueo shelter were also prospected discovering, 200 m away, a probable source of pigments: two blocks of raw material for red pigment production. The site was denominated La Oficina. Figure 3 shows a partial view of 0.80 m3 of the La Oficina rock, the suspected main pigment source.

With the aim to look for chemical compositional analogies between Carriqueo and La Oficina sites, a set of 34 specimens was analyzed. Synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction (SR-XRD) was selected as the instrumental technique used in this study (Bugoi et al., Reference Bugoi, Constantinescu, Pantos and Popovici2008; Welcomme et al., Reference Welcomme, Walter, Bleuet, Hodeau, Dooryhee, Martinetto and Menu2007; Calza et al. Reference Calza, Anjos, Mendonca de Souza, Bracaglion and Lopes2008; Sánchez del Río et al., Reference Sánchez del Río, Gutiérrez-León, Castro, Rubio-Zuazo, Solís, Sánchez-Hernández, Robles-Camacho and Rojas-Gaytán2008). Remarkable reasons are the higher flux which improves the signal to noise ratio and the polarization of the incident beam in relation to the sample, increasing in this way the sensitivity. The detection limit by conventional laboratory X-ray diffraction is in the range of a few weight percent, limiting the required amount of sample. SR-XRD improved the detection limit allowing the analyses of minute samples. Elemental analysis is widely applied for this kind of study. However, an appreciable amount of sample is required for most of the analytical techniques. In addition, phase identification is mandatory since the colour could depend not only on the element amount but also on the crystalline composition of the pigment (Dillmann et al., Reference Dillmann, Neff, Mazaudier, Hoerle, Chevallier and Beranger2002; Artioli, Reference Artioli2008; Simova et al., Reference Simova, Bezdicka, Hradilova, Hradil and Grygar2005). Then, the use of X-ray fluorescence, inductively coupled plasma, atomic emission spectrometry, and neutron activation analysis is limited. It is expected that SR-XRD would provide valuable information about the phase composition without compromising the integrity of the archaeological information.

II. EXPERIMENTAL

A. Sampling and sample preparation

Carriqueo samples were obtained during excavation at different levels. Figure 4 shows three examples of the analyzed samples.

Figure 5. (Color online) Rotating capillary containing the pigment sample in the X-ray path.

TABLE I. SRDRX results, site, stratigraphic level, stratum, and identified colour according to Munsell chart for the 34 analyzed samples.

As shown in this figure, the amount of samples is extremely small, less than 100 mg in all the cases. Two representative samples from La Oficina were taken for the comparison. An agate mortar and pestle were used to crush and grind each specimen into powders to ensure better homogeneity. The powders were passed through a plastic sieve with mesh of 0.074 mm and carefully introduced in a 0.3 mm diameter Mark-Rohrchen boron capillary sample holder; this procedure minimises preferential orientation (Piszora et al., Reference Piszora, Nawrocki, Darul, Nowicki and Evans2008). The use of the capillary method allows the use of small amounts of sample material and preserves the sample for further microanalysis. Finally, a set of 34 samples was measured.

B. XRD Instrument

The obtained samples were characterized in the D12A-XRD1 beamline at the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS). The beamline is equipped with a three-circle Huber diffractometer (θ,2θ,φ), which permits the rotation of a sample in three axes (Figure 5) (Lima et al., Reference Lima, Barroso, Braz, Droppa, Oliveira and Lopes2007).

Figure 6. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of sample 6 corresponding to group I showing the presence of haematite.

The energy of the beam was 7.100 keV and the intensities were monitored with a detector perpendicularly located. The scan speed was 0.02° min−1 for the 2θ range of 10 to 70°.

C. Analysis

After the beamline was adjusted, the capillary containing the sample was mounted and located in the X-ray path. This operation was controlled using an external screen. Once the samples were measured, the collected data were analyzed using the CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA free software package (Oxford Cryosystems, Inc., 2007).

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table I shows the SR-XRD results as well as the site, stratigraphic level, stratum, and identified colour according to the Munsell chart (Munsell Soil Colour Charts, 1994) for the 34 analyzed samples. In order to group the samples, the presence of haematite (Htt, α-Fe2O3) was used as one of the references. Following this criterion, four groups were formed:

Figure 7. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of La Oficina creek sample corresponding to group I showing the presence of haematite.

Group II shows the presence of goethite (JPCDS, ICDD, No. 29-0713) associated with kaolinite (K) and quartz. The samples exhibit high crystallinity, similar to those of group I (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of sample 8 corresponding to group II showing the presence of goethite.

  • I. Presence of Htt corresponding to samples 2 to 6, 10 to 17, 20 to 21, and 24 to 34;

  • II. Presence of goethite (Gtt, FeOOH) and no Htt corresponding to samples 8, 9, 18, and 19;

  • III. Nonreddish samples corresponding to samples 7 and 23; and

  • IV. Reddish samples but no chromophores detected corresponding to samples 1 and 22 (Q, quartz).

In order to assess the validity of the classification based on the presence or absence of haematite, the following remarks based on the SR-XRD results can be made.

Group I shows similar diffraction patterns: the peaks of quartz (JPCDS, ICDD, Card No. 46-1045) and haematite (JPCDS, ICDD, Card No. 33-0664) are intense and well defined indicating good crystallinity. The presence of haematite is associated in some samples also with a zeolite. Natural zeolites could come from volcanic ashes and crystallize in postdepositional environments over large periods of time in marine basins, which are the case of Los Andes mountains (Bouza et al. Reference Bouza, Simón, Aguilar, del Valle and Rostagno2007) (Figure 6).

Figure 9. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of sample 23 corresponding to group III with nonreddish evidences.

Figure 10. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of sample 22 corresponding to group IV with no evidences of chromophore substances.

It must be noted that La Oficina samples belong to group I, as the majority of the red coloured samples, and have similar diffraction patterns regarding the phases and crystallinity (see Figures 6 and 7).

Only two green samples correspond to group III. The phase found in both samples was mica (Mi). The green-grey colour leads to associate samples 7 and 23 with green earths. There are several green earth mica minerals such as celadonite, glauconite, etc., which have been used as green pigments since ancient periods (Murray, Reference Murray2000). Identification of green earth mica minerals is complicated because of the similarities in their powder patterns (Tamburini et al., Reference Tamburini, Adatte, Föllmi, Prell, Wang, Blum, Rea and Clemens2003). In this case the results show the presence of mica but they are inconclusive about the nature of the source of the green colour (Figure 9). Finally, group IV corresponding to reddish samples presents the sharp peaks of quartz but no evidence of red pigments. This could be the result of the presence of a noncrystalline pigment or of its low concentration (Figure 10).

IV. CONCLUSIONS

It has been demonstrated the potential of SR-XRD in the archaeometry field and its suitability as an analytical technique for provenance studies. In this work, it was successfully employed for explaining chemical compositional analogies between samples coming from Carriqueo and La Oficina sites. In this way, it could be concluded that La Oficina site seems to be the provenance source for red pigment samples found at Carriqueo archaeological site. Although four different groups have been identified, the provenance of them would still need to be investigated using complementary techniques such as microanalysis by total-reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. In terms of archaeology, the importance of this work is to confirm that the human groups in the surroundings of Limay river had a strategy of supplying of raw material based on the use of the closest resource. This research helps us to increase the understanding of the human group mobility in the North Patagonia area of Argentina using pigment information as an archaeological evidence. Data published in this research contribute to interested archaeologists and archaeometrists as a reference for further studies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work has been supported by the Laboratório Nacional de Luz Síncrotron (LNLS), Campinas, Brazil, under Proposal Nos. D12A XRD1 6558/08 and IAEA 13864, and the following Argentinean Projects, under Grant Nos. PIP 5344, UBACYT F059 y I809, and PICT14171. The authors also thank the Council for Scientific, Technological and Humanistic Research of the Universidad Centro Occidental Lisandro Alvarado, Barquisimeto, Venezuela.

References

Albornoz, A. (1996). “Sitios con arte rupestre en los alrededores del lago Nahuel Huapi (Río Negro),” in Proceedings Segundas Jornadas de Arqueología de la Patagonia, edited by Otero, J. G. (CENPAT, Madryn), pp. 123133.Google Scholar
Artioli, G. (2008). “Archaeometry: Advances with neutron and synchrotron beams,” The 11th European Powder Diffraction Conference (Pielaszek Research, Poland).Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef Mayer, D. E. (1997), “Miscellaneous Finds: The Marine Shells from Netiv Hagdud,” An Early Neolithic Village in the Jordan Valley, Part I: The Archaeology of Netiv Hagdud, edited by Gopher, A., American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin 43, pp. 189192.Google Scholar
Bikiaris, D., Daniilia, S., Sotiropoulou, S., Katsimbiri, O., Pavlidou, E., Moutsatsou, A., and Chryssoulakis, Y. (2000). “Ochre-differentiation through micro-Raman and micro-FTIR spectroscopies: Application on wall paintings at Meteora and Mount Athos, Greece,” Spectrochim. Acta, Part A SAMCAS 56, 318.10.1016/S1386-1425(99)00134-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouza, P. J., Simón, M., Aguilar, A., del Valle, H., and Rostagno, M. (2007). “Fibrous-clay mineral formation and soil evolution in Aridisols of northeastern Patagonia, Argentina,” Geoderma GEDMAB 139, 3850.10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugoi, R., Constantinescu, B., Pantos, E., and Popovici, D. (2008). “Investigation of neolithic ceramic pigments using synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction,” Powder Diffr. PODIE2 23, 195199.10.1154/1.2958068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calza, C., Anjos, M. J., Mendonca de Souza, S. M. F., Bracaglion, J. R. A., and Lopes, R. T. (2008). “X-ray microfluorescence with synchrotron radiation applied in the analysis of pigments from ancient Egypt,” Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. APAMFC 90, 7579.10.1007/s00339-007-4234-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, R. M. and Schwertmann, U. (1996). The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses (VCH, New York).Google Scholar
Crivelli Montero, E., Cordero, A., Palacios, O., and Ramos, M. (2007). “Especialización funcional de sitios durante el período ceramolítico de la cuenca del río limay: El caso del alero carriqueo,” Proceedings XVI Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Argentina (Universidad Nacional de San Salvedor de Jujuy, Argentina), Vol. 3, pp. 339345.Google Scholar
Dillmann, P., Neff, D., Mazaudier, F., Hoerle, S., Chevallier, P., and Beranger, G. (2002). “Characterisation of iron archaeological analogues using micro diffraction under synchrotron radiation. Application to the study of long term corrosion behaviour of low alloy steels,” J. Phys. IV (France)JPICEI 12, 393408.Google Scholar
Fiore, D., Maier, M., Parera, D., Orquera, L., and Piana, E. (2008). “Chemical analyses of the earliest pigment residues from the uttermost part of the planet (Beagle Channel region, Tierra del Fuego, Southern South America),” J. Archaeol. Sci. JASCDU 35, 30473056.10.1016/j.jas.2008.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradín, C., Aguerre, A., and Albornoz, A. (2003). Arqueología de Río Negro (Secretaría de Estado de Acción Social de Río Negro, Argentina).Google Scholar
Hajduk, A., Albornoz, A., and Lezcano, M. (2004). “El mylodon en el patio de atrás Informe preliminar sobre los trabajos en el sitio El Trébol, ejido urbano de San Carlos de Bariloche, prvincia de Río Negro, in Contra viento y marea, Arqueología de Patagonia, edited by Civalero, M. T., Fernández, P., and Guráieb, A. (Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano y Sociedad Argentina de Antropologoía, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp. 715732 ).Google Scholar
Helwig, K. (1997). “A note on burnt yellow earth pigments: Documentary sources and scientific analysis,” Studies in Conservation 42, 181188.10.2307/1506714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helwig, K. (2007). “Iron oxide pigments: Natural and synthetic,” in Artists Pigments—A Handbook of their History and Characteristics, edited by Berrie, B. H. (National Gallery of Art, Washington), Vol. 4, pp. 439495.Google Scholar
Hradil, D., Grygar, T., Hradilová, J., and Bezdička, P. (2003). “Clay and iron oxide pigments in the history,” Appl. Clay Sci. ACLSER 22, 223236.10.1016/S0169-1317(03)00076-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JCPDS, International Centre for Diffraction Data. (2001). Card Nos. 29-0713, 46-1045, 33-0664, Swarthmore, PA.Google Scholar
Leach, E. (1976). “Color symbolism” Culture and Communication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511607684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, J. C., Barroso, R. C., Braz, D., Droppa, R. Jr., Oliveira, L. F., and Lopes, R. T. (2007). “Evaluation of bone mineral density loss using an X-ray powder diffractometer and synchrotron radiation at LNLS—Brazil,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A NIMAER 580, 469472.10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimore, J. L., Marshall, L. J., Almond, M. J., Hollins, P., and Matthews, W. (2004). “Analysis of red and yellow ochre samples from Clearwell Caves and Catalhöyük by vibrational spectroscopy and other techniques,” Spectrochim. Acta, Part A SAMCAS 60, 1179–88.10.1016/j.saa.2003.08.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munsell Soil Colour Charts (1994). (MacBeth Division of Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., New York).Google Scholar
Murray, H. H. (2000). “Traditional and new applications for kaolin, smectite, and palygorskite: A general overview,” Appl. Clay Sci. ACLSER 17, 207221.10.1016/S0169-1317(00)00016-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford Cryosystems, Inc. (2007). CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA software (Computer software), free version, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Palacios, O. and Ramos, M. (2009). “Alero carriqueo: Análisis de una muestra de instrumentos líticos,” VI Congreso Argentino de Americanistas 15 y 16 de Mayo 2008 en la Universidad del Salvador (Sociedad Argentina de Americanistas, Buenos Aires, Argentina), Vol. 2, pp. 283305.Google Scholar
Parada, E. and Peredo, S. (2008). “Diplodan Patagonicus,” Gayana (Concepción) 72, pp. 266267.Google Scholar
Piszora, P., Nawrocki, J., Darul, J., Nowicki, W., and Evans, A. (2008). “Synchrotron X-ray diffraction studies of products of the steel pipe corrosion measured in the native aqueous suspension,” The 11th European Powder Diffraction Conference (Pielaszek Research, Poland).Google Scholar
Podestá, M. (2003). “Rock art research in Argentina at the end of the millennium,” in Rock Art Studies: News of the World 2. Developments in Rock Art Research 1995–1999, edited by Bahn, P. and Fossati, A. (Oxbow, Oxford), pp. 242251.Google Scholar
Sánchez del Río, M., Gutiérrez-León, A., Castro, G. R., Rubio-Zuazo, J., Solís, C., Sánchez-Hernández, R., Robles-Camacho, J., and Rojas-Gaytán, J. (2008). “Synchrotron powder diffraction on Aztec blue pigments,” Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. APAMFC 90, 5560.10.1007/s00339-007-4264-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simova, V., Bezdicka, P., Hradilova, J., Hradil, D., and Grygar, T. (2005). “X-ray powder microdiffraction for routine analysis of paintings,” Powder Diffr. PODIE2 20, 224229.10.1154/1.1938983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamburini, F., Adatte, T., and Föllmi, K. (2003). “Origin and nature of green clay layers, odp leg 184, South China sea,” in Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, edited by Prell, W. L., Wang, P., Blum, P., Rea, D. K., and Clemens, S. C., (University of Texas, Texas), Vol. 184, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Trubitt, M. B. D. (2003). “The Production and Exchange of Marine Shell Prestige Goods,” J. Arch. Research 11, pp. 243277.10.1023/A:1025028814962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, K., Helwig, M., Podestá, C., and Bellelli, C. (2000). “Análisis of pigments from rock painting sites in Río Negro and Chubut Provinces,” Arte en las Rocas. Arte Rupestre, Menhires y Piedras de Colores en la Argentina (Sociedad Argentina de Antropología, Buenos Aires), pp. 203206.Google Scholar
Welcomme, E., Walter, P., Bleuet, P., Hodeau, P. J., Dooryhee, E., Martinetto, P., and Menu, M. (2007). “Classification of lead white pigments using synchrotron radiation micro X-ray diffraction,” Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. APAMFC 89, 825832.10.1007/s00339-007-4217-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the site location (by Mabel Fernández).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (Color online) Flat view of Carriqueo shelter (by Luis Teira).

Figure 2

Figure 3. (Color online) La Oficina site, suspected source of red pigments.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (Color online) Pigment sample sizes.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (Color online) Rotating capillary containing the pigment sample in the X-ray path.

Figure 5

TABLE I. SRDRX results, site, stratigraphic level, stratum, and identified colour according to Munsell chart for the 34 analyzed samples.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of sample 6 corresponding to group I showing the presence of haematite.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of La Oficina creek sample corresponding to group I showing the presence of haematite.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of sample 8 corresponding to group II showing the presence of goethite.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of sample 23 corresponding to group III with nonreddish evidences.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Synchrotron powder diffraction pattern of sample 22 corresponding to group IV with no evidences of chromophore substances.