Sir,
It may just be worth adding the following remark to M. Vallon’s letter. When the strain of the ice over the interval considered is large it is perhaps not immediately obvious how to calculate the correction term, because the length of stake buried in the ice, the gauge Length, is changing over the interval in an irregular way, as the ablation rate changes. But, if one assumes that the vertical strain-rate
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170925045404969-0689:S0022143000020542:S0022143000020542_eqn1.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170925045404969-0689:S0022143000020542:S0022143000020542_eqn2.gif?pub-status=live)
where b is the true ablation, e is the length of stake exposed (the apparent ablation), Δt is the time interval, and
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170925045404969-0689:S0022143000020542:S0022143000020542_eqn3.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170925045404969-0689:S0022143000020542:S0022143000020542_eqn4.gif?pub-status=live)
21 August 1967