Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T01:40:00.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toxicity of marine pollutants on the ascidian oocyte physiology: an electrophysiological approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2017

Alessandra Gallo*
Affiliation:
Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121 Naples, Italy.
*
All correspondence to: Alessandra Gallo, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121 Naples, Italy. Tel: +39 0815833233. Fax +39 0817641355. E-mail: alessandra.gallo@szn.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In marine animals with external fertilization, gametes are released into seawater where fertilization and embryo development occur. Consequently, pollutants introduced into the marine environment by human activities may affect gametes and embryos. These xenobiotics can alter cell physiology with consequent reduction of fertilization success. Here the adverse effects on the reproductive processes of the marine invertebrate Ciona intestinalis (ascidian) of different xenobiotics: lead, zinc, an organic tin compound and a phenylurea herbicide were evaluated. By using the electrophysiological technique of whole-cell voltage clamping, the effects of these compounds on the mature oocyte plasma membrane electrical properties and the electrical events of fertilization were tested by calculating the concentration that induced 50% normal larval formation (EC50). The results demonstrated that sodium currents in mature oocytes were reduced in a concentration-dependent manner by all tested xenobiotics, with the lowest EC50 value for lead. In contrast, fertilization current frequencies were differently affected by zinc and organic tin compound. Toxicity tests on gametes demonstrated that sperm fertilizing capability and fertilization oocyte competence were not altered by xenobiotics, whereas fertilization was inhibited in zinc solution and underwent a reduction in organic tin compound solution (EC50 value of 1.7 µM). Furthermore, fertilized oocytes resulted in a low percentage of normal larvae with an EC50 value of 0.90 µM. This study shows that reproductive processes of ascidians are highly sensitive to xenobiotics suggesting that they may be considered a reliable biomarker and that ascidians are suitable model organisms to assess marine environmental quality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

Over the last decades, diverse substances have been released into the marine environment due to agricultural and industrial processes. These chemicals include heavy metals, organic tin compounds, herbicides and pesticides, which can cause endocrine disruption and reproductive disorders in animals and affect the survival of aquatic wildlife (Danzo, Reference Danzo1997, Reference Danzo1998; Henson & Chedrese, Reference Henson and Chedrese2004; Wurl & Obbard, Reference Wurl and Obbard2004; Pennati et al., Reference Pennati, Groppelli, Zega, Biggiogero, De Bernardi and Sotgia2006; Zega et al., Reference Zega, De Bernardi, Groppelli and Pennati2009a). Animal reproduction is a step-by-step process that starts with the production and maturation of the gametes (spermatogenesis and oogenesis), and ends with fertilization. This process is a highly specialized mixture of cell interaction and signal transduction that gives rise to a new individual of the same species. Among the events underling reproduction, a key role is played by the reciprocal activation of the gametes, which include consecutive steps such as recognition, binding and fusion between oocyte and sperm (Tosti & Ménézo, Reference Tosti and Ménézo2016). At the time of their interaction, the oocyte undergoes three main types of modifications: electrical, morphological, and metabolic (Dale, Reference Dale1994).

Gametes are excitable cells that, during the processes of maturation and fertilization, undergo transient modifications of their electrical properties due to the activity of ion channels present on their plasma membrane. These channels participate in the regulation of gamete physiology, and ion current activities have been demonstrated widely in oocytes and spermatozoa of all animals studied (Tosti & Boni, Reference Tosti and Boni2004; Tosti et al., Reference Tosti, Gallo and Silvestre2011; Gallo & Tosti, Reference Gallo and Tosti2015b). Ascidians (Chordata, Ascidiacea), or sea squirt, constitute a widely studied species in reproductive and developmental biology (Dale, Reference Dale, Woodhead and Vivirito1989; Satoh, Reference Satoh1994). As sessile filter-feeding organisms, ascidians are able to accumulate and concentrate substances present in seawater in their tissues.

By using electrophysiological techniques, ion current patterns were studied from the immature stage up to early embryo development in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis (Cuomo et al., Reference Cuomo, Silvestre, De Santis and Tosti2006; Silvestre et al., Reference Silvestre, Cuomo and Tosti2009). In particular, a role for sodium (Na+) current was highlighted, underlying the mature oocyte stage and the interaction with the spermatozoon. In C. intestinalis, the first electrical modification of the oocyte at fertilization is the generation of an inward ion current [i.e. fertilization current (FC)] due to gating of non-selective channels (Dale & De Felice, Reference Dale and De Felice1984; Dale, Reference Dale1994). This step is followed by depolarization of the resting potential and contraction of the cell body. The latter step is generated by a calcium wave that crosses the oocyte from the vegetal pole to the animal pole (Brownlee & Dale, Reference Brownlee and Dale1990). A very quick developmental cycle gives rise within 24 h to a swimming larva that promptly settles to a substrate and undergoes dramatic metamorphosis that generates the adult individual. As all these processes occur in the seawater after gamete spawning, it is evident that they are influenced by the quality of the environment.

Heavy metals are recognized as major pollutants of the marine environment and have toxic effects on marine organisms (Depledge et al., Reference Depledge, Weeks, Bjerregaard and Calow1994). Metals are classified as essential and non-essential elements based on the fact that they may participate in some physiological processes (Falchuk & Montorzi, Reference Falchuk and Montorzi2001) or they have no role in biological systems, although may be tolerated at low concentrations. Metals may exert a negative effect on reproductive processes such as gamete functionality, embryogenesis, embryo development, metamorphosis and even on growth and survival of different marine organisms (Martin et al., Reference Martin, Osborn, Billig and Glickstein1981; Wong et al., Reference Wong, Chu, Tang, Tam and Wong1993; Itow et al., Reference Itow, Loveland and Botton1998; Au & Chiang, Reference Au and Chiang2000; Fernández & Beiras, Reference Fernández and Beiras2001; Beiras & Albentosa, Reference Beiras and Albentosa2004; Popek et al., Reference Popek, Dietrich, Glogowski, Demska-Zakeś, Drag-Kozak, Sionkowski, Łuszczek-Trojan, Epler, Demianowicz and Sarosiek2005; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, Andrade, Asteasuain and Marcovecchio2006; Porte et al., Reference Porte, Janer, Lorusso, Ortiz-Zarragoitia, Cajaraville, Fossi and Canesi2006; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Liu, Yang, Wang and Lin2009).

Organic tin compounds comprise a group of organometallic moieties characterized by a Sn atom covalently bound to one or more organic substituents largely used in industrial and agricultural applications. The growing use of organic tin compounds as fungicides, glass coatings, catalysts, PVC thermostabilizers, and biocides in antifouling paints represents the major sources of these contaminants in the marine environment. Organic tin compounds can be degraded (by exposure to sunlight and by bacteria) into inorganic tin compounds. The chemical, physical, and biochemical properties of inorganic tin compounds differ dramatically from those of organic tin compounds. Inorganic tin compounds are of low toxicological risk due largely to their low solubility, poor absorption, low accumulations in tissues, and rapid excretion. In contrast, organic tin compounds produce a variety of harmful effects but their toxicological pattern is not yet fully elucidated. The biological effects of these substances depend on the nature, number and type of organic groups. In recent years, several research groups have shown that organic tin compounds caused several adverse effects, including reproductive disorders in different marine species (Alzieu, Reference Alzieu2000).

Phenylurea derivatives have been widely used as active ingredients in herbicidal preparations, so they are frequently found in the marine environment. Recent monitoring studies have reported the presence of several phenylurea derivatives such as isoproturon, diuron, linuron, monolinuron, metoxuron, and chlortoluron in seawater around several European countries. However, their fate and toxicity in the marine environment are still poorly understood, creating a concern for the adverse environmental effects on marine organisms (Voulvoulis et al., Reference Voulvoulis, Scrimshaw and Lester1999; Yamada, Reference Yamada2007).

In this paper, we report the effects of two metals (zinc an essential element and lead a non-essential element), plus an organic tin compound and a phenylurea herbicide on the specific reproductive mechanisms of the marine invertebrate C. intestinalis. In particular, the effects of exposure to xenobiotics on oocyte physiology, FC and morphological (cell contraction) events induced at the time of sperm–oocyte interaction were investigated. Furthermore, the long-term effects of ion currents or FC impairment on embryo development and larval formation and morphology were evaluated.

These data provide a solid ground that confirms previous studies (Papadopoulou & Kanias, Reference Papadopoulou and Kanias1977; Zega et al., Reference Zega, Pennati, Candiani, Pestarino and De Bernardi2009b) on the possible use of ascidians as bioindicators of the marine environment, indicating the suitability of this species to test the effects of environmental stressors on marine animal reproductive physiology.

Materials and methods

Animals and gametes

Adults of C. intestinalis were collected from the Gulf of Naples (Italy) and maintained in laboratory aquaria with running seawater at 18°C. For the experiments, adults were anaesthetised in ice and mature oocytes were collected from the oviduct and kept in Petri dishes containing natural seawater (NSW) until use. Spermatozoa were collected from the sperm duct of other animals and then used for inseminating oocytes at a concentration of 106/ml in NSW.

Experimental solutions

Lead (PbCl2) and zinc (ZnCl2) stock solutions were prepared by dissolving chloride salts of 99+% purity (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) in double-distilled water and then diluted in NSW at the desired final concentrations. In each experiment filtered (Millipore 0.22 µm; MilliQ, Medford, MA, USA) NSW was used as the control solution. In order to evaluate the effects of these metals on ion currents, FC and embryo and larval development, the oocytes were incubated for 30 min and/or fertilized in metal solutions at the following metal concentrations: 0.04, 0.05, 0.07, 0.4, 0.7, 1.1 µM of lead; and 7, 183, 367, 550 µM of zinc. The starting concentration of lead (0.04 µM) was taken from the maximum standard value established from Italian legislation for seawater quality (D.lgs. 152/06). In contrast for zinc there are no limits we referred to the concentrations tested by Gopalakrishnan et al. (Reference Gopalakrishnan, Thilagam and Raja2007).

The tested phenylurea was 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) and its stock solutions were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). A stock solution of the organic tin compound, i.e. tributyltin, was prepared in ethanol. Test solutions were obtained by diluting the stock solution in NSW at the following concentration: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 µM from reference to the literature on the C. intestinalis and other ascidian species (Cima et al., Reference Cima, Ballarin, Bressa, Martinucci and Burighel1996; Franchet et al., Reference Franchet, Goudeau and Goudeau1999; Patricolo et al., Reference Patricolo, Mansueto, D'Agati and Pellerito2001). As ethanol and DMSO were used to prepare stock solutions, negative controls were made with equivalent volumes at a final concentration of 0.1% (that is, the higher per cent in the test solutions) and results showed no observable effects on gametes and fertilization.

Three replicates of each concentration were tested. Each experiment was performed 10 times.

Toxicity tests

Spermatozoa

Freshly collected spermatozoa were diluted in NSW at final concentration of 106/ml. Aliquots of this dilution were added to vials containing 1 ml of test solutions and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Following exposure, spermatozoa were added to 10 ml of NSW containing about 200 oocytes. As a control, an untreated aliquot of the sperm dilution was used to fertilize oocytes from the same batch (ca. 200). The dishes were incubated in a culture chamber at 18°C and, after 50 min, fertilization rate was determined by the occurrence of the first cleavage in the control. Then the dishes were incubated again for 24 h and the percentage of abnormal larvae was calculated.

Oocytes

Mature oocytes (ca. 200 oocytes), collected from the same animal, were transferred into Petri dishes containing 5 ml of test solutions and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Oocytes were then rinsed with NSW, transferred to Petri dishes containing 10 ml of NSW and then fertilized. As a control, untreated oocytes (ca. 200) from the same batch were fertilized. The dishes were incubated in a culture chamber at 18°C. Fertilization rate and the percentage of abnormal larvae were determined as previously described.

Fertilization

Mature oocytes (ca. 200 oocytes) and spermatozoa were added to Petri dishes containing 10 ml of tested solutions. As a control, gametes (ca. 200 oocytes) were added to Petri dishes containing NSW. The dishes were incubated in a culture chamber at 18°C. Fertilization rate and the percentage of normal larvae were determined as above.

Electrophysiological techniques

Electrophysiological recordings were performed using whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique. The chorion and follicle cells surrounding the mature oocytes were removed manually using steel needles, naked oocytes were then transferred to a recording chamber containing NSW. Recordings were performed using a List EPC-7 patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA Electronics, Cologne, Germany), filtered at 3 kHz and digitized with a Digidata 1322A. Ion currents were acquired and analyzed using pClamp9 software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA).

Patch pipettes were made from borosilicate glass capillaries (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, USA) and pulled using a Sutter P-87 (Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA, USA) with a 1–2 µm tip in diameter showing a resistance of 3–5 megaOhms when filled with an intracellular-like solution (200 mM K2SO4; 20 mM NaCl; 200 mM sucrose; 10 mM EGTA; 10 mM HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.5).

Electrophysiological recordings were performed as follows: after formation of a cell-attached configuration, a light negative pressure was applied to induce the rupture of the membrane patch allowing the access to oocyte cytoplasm. In this configuration, from a holding potential of −80 mV, voltage-dependent Na+ currents were elicited by applying depolarizing ramps of 10 mV to the test potential from −70 mV to +20 mV. These currents were maximally activated by voltage step to −40 mV. The FC was generated by adding spermatozoa to the recording bath containing an oocyte voltage clamped at −80 mV. The effect of tested xenobiotics on Na+ currents and FC was evaluated by incubating the oocytes for 30 min in test solutions before the electrophysiological recording.

Statistical analysis

Data were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). In order to test significant differences between the control group and test concentrations and among the test concentration groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed followed by Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test. For values expressed as percentages, data were analyzed after arcsine transformation to achieve normality. Significance level was always set at α = 0.05.

The Probit method was used to calculate the EC50.

Results

Toxicity tests

Gametes

Pre-exposure of fertilizing spermatozoa to all the tested xenobiotics had no significant effect on fertilization rate and embryo and larval development. Similarly, no significant effects on fertilization rate and percentage of normal larvae were observed after fertilization of treated oocytes with untreated spermatozoa even at the highest concentrations used (data not shown).

Fertilization and embryo development

Lead had no toxic effects on fertilization rate and embryo development at concentration up to 0.4 µM, whereas zinc inhibited fertilization at all the tested concentrations.

The organic tin compound reduced the fertilization rate with an EC50 value of 1.7 µM and normal larvae percentage with an EC50 of 0.90 µM (Fig. 1). Furthermore, at concentrations higher than 1 µM, embryo development was affected resulting in morphologically abnormal larvae especially for tail malformations (Fig. 2). Even if phenylurea did not affect the fertilization rate, a significant decrease in the percentage of normal larvae was detected with an EC50 value of 2.8 µM (Fig. 1).

Figure 1 Organic tin compound and phenylurea effects on C. intestinalis fertilization. Fertilization rate (A) and percentage of normal larvae (B, C) obtained after fertilization in organic tin compound and phenylurea DCMU solutions, respectively. Solid circles represent the mean of 10 experiments, and the solid line indicates the fit of the experimental data to the logistic model. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).

Figure 2 Organic tin compound and phenylurea effects on C. intestinalis larval development. (A) Normal larvae at 24 h post fertilization developed from oocytes fertilized in NSW. (B) Embryo developed in organic tin solution arrested at different developmental stages. Abnormal larvae developed from oocytes fertilized in organic tin (C) and the phenylurea DCMU (D) solution at different concentrations showing various degrees of malformations such as abnormal heads and stunted and coiled tails. Bar represents 100 µm.

Effects on ion currents

Na+ currents

As illustrated in the concentration–response curves (Fig. 3), all tested xenobiotics reduced the amplitude of Na+ currents, following typical sigmoidal pattern. The lowest EC50 was obtained for lead (0.4 µM) followed by organic tin compound (1.7 µM), phenylurea (4.3 µM) and zinc (106 µM). The four xenobiotics tested were ranked consistently in the following order from highest to lowest toxicity: lead > organic tin compound > phenylurea > zinc.

Figure 3 Effect of xenobiotics on C. intestinalis oocyte Na+ current. Na+ current amplitude after 30 min exposure of oocytes to different concentrations of lead (A), zinc (B), organic tin compound (C) and phenylurea DCMU (D). Solid circles represent the mean of replicates for all treatments, and the solid line indicates the fit of the experimental data to the logistic model. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).

Fertilization current

In oocytes incubated with lead and phenylurea and then fertilized under voltage clamp conditions, the frequency of FC showed no significant differences between the control and the test concentration groups. In contrast, oocytes incubated with all tested concentrations of zinc did not generate FC, whereas FC frequency significantly decreased in a concentration-dependent manner in oocytes incubated with organic tin compound with an EC50 value of 3.2 µM (Fig. 4).

Figure 4 Organic tin compound effect on C. intestinalis fertilization current (FC). The frequency of FC recorded in oocytes after 30 min exposure to different concentrations of organic tin compound was reduced in a concentration-dependent manner. Solid circles represent the mean of replicates for all treatments, and the solid line indicates the fit of the experimental data to the logistic model. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).

Discussion

In this study, the adverse effects exerted by two inorganic and two organic xenobiotics on the reproductive processes of the ascidian C. intestinalis and, in particular, on oocyte physiology and fertilization were shown.

Modulation of electrical properties of oocyte plasma membrane represents a fundamental step in gamete maturation and the fertilization process. In C. intestinalis oocytes, the presence and modification of voltage-dependent currents were well described starting from the immature stages. In particular, a key role of Na+ currents was highlighted, as their amplitude is high at the MI stage and in the zygote and decreases in the following developmental stages (Cuomo et al., Reference Cuomo, Silvestre, De Santis and Tosti2006; Silvestre et al., Reference Silvestre, Cuomo and Tosti2009; Tosti et al., Reference Tosti, Gallo and Silvestre2011). All xenobiotics tested in the present study, although different for their chemistry and mode of action, significantly reduced the amplitude of Na+ currents, but exerted different selective actions on other events such as the FC frequency, fertilization rate and larval development.

A dose–response relationship was found between xenobiotic concentration and Na+ current amplitude. The four tested xenobiotics could be ranked in the following order from highest to lowest toxicity on Na+ currents of C. intestinalis mature oocytes: lead > organic tin compound > phenylurea > zinc. Na+ currents were also shown to be sensitive to xenobiotic effects in our recent study (Gallo & Tosti, Reference Gallo and Tosti2015c). Taken together, all these data suggest that Na+ currents can be a suitable biomarker in the risk assessment of aquatic ecosystems giving key insight into pollutant exposure and effects and providing an early warning to potential damage in marine organisms.

Lead was the most toxic compound for ion currents of C. intestinalis mature oocytes, while zinc was the least toxic xenobiotic tested. Moreover, zinc and organic tin compound, but not lead and phenylurea, interfered with FC suggesting a different affinity of these compounds with channels that generate FC (Gallo & Tosti, Reference Gallo and Tosti2013). Xenobiotic pre-exposure of C. intestinalis spermatozoa did not affect their fertilization ability and offspring quality in agreement with previous data that reported no effects of other metals and tributyltin on the fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa of either C. intestinalis or other ascidians (Franchet et al., Reference Franchet, Goudeau and Goudeau1999; Bellas et al., Reference Bellas, Vázquez and Beiras2001), although one study demonstrated that the fertilization ability of spermatozoa of the ascidian Ascidia malaca was influenced by organotin compounds (Villa et al., Reference Villa, Agati, Mansueto, Pellerito, Scopelliti, Fiore, Nagy and Pellerito2003). Furthermore, treatment of oocytes with each of the four xenobiotics did not prevent fertilization nor alter embryo development.

When C. intestinalis oocytes were fertilized in toxic solutions, the tested xenobiotics showed none (lead and DCMU) or major (zinc and organic tin compound) effects on the fertilization rate. These results correlated with the observed reduction of FC frequency, suggesting a new possible mechanism of action of these compounds on ion channel activity and highlighting the role of ion currents in the fertilization process.

Moreover, organic tin compounds exert a long-term effect on larval development and morphology, inducing various degrees of larval malformations such as coiled tail and irregular head. This finding is crucial as tail retraction is a key event in the initial stage of metamorphosis and their malformation may impede the correct transformation of the larva into an adult organism.

According to several studies, ascidians play a relevant role in the environment, representing species to be protected as cosmopolitan components of the marine ecosystems. Although these species themselves are fouling organisms, evidence has accumulated over the last decade that indicated that they are particularly sensitive to environmental pollution (Franchet et al., Reference Franchet, Goudeau and Goudeau1999; Bellas et al., Reference Bellas, Vázquez and Beiras2001; Bellas, Reference Bellas2005, Reference Bellas2006; Pennati et al., Reference Pennati, Groppelli, Zega, Biggiogero, De Bernardi and Sotgia2006) and this characteristic makes them a suitable model for toxicity evaluation of marine contaminants and for the seawater quality assessment (Gallo & Tosti, Reference Gallo and Tosti2015a).

Biomonitoring programmes rely on the use of biomarkers and bioindicators that are processes or organisms, providing information on the environmental quality through biochemical, physiological or morphological reactions (Holt and Miller, Reference Holt and Miller2011). In the past, many marine organisms have been proposed as bioindicators of environmental pollution such as echinoderms and molluscs (Bellas, Reference Bellas2007; Nacci et al., Reference Nacci, Jackim and Walsh1986). In particular sea urchin early embryo growth test and sperm cell toxicity test have been used for long time to evaluate toxicity of a closed environment and recently new modified bioassays have been found to be good alternatives to the traditional tests (Manzo, Reference Manzo2004; Matranga & Corsi, Reference Matranga and Corsi2012; Gallo et al., Reference Gallo, Boni and Tosti2018). At present, there is a need to identify new genotoxic and teratogenic tests to associate with environmental quality monitoring.

Some potential bioindicators for investigating pollutants effects that have recently been proposed are molluscs (Waykar & Deshmukh, Reference Waykar and Deshmukh2012; Boni et al., Reference Boni, Gallo, Montanino, Macina and Tosti2016), zebrafish (Segner, Reference Segner2009) or others (Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Zhang, Fu, Shi and Jiang2008) with distinct advantages and disadvantages for each.

Ideal candidates for pollution biomonitoring should be sessile and filter-feeders organism. Sessile organisms have no possibility to avoid the pollution source, whereas a filter feeder processing large amounts of water is able to accumulate and concentrate toxicants. In either case, they may provide evidence of environmental changes and allow the identification of polluted areas.

Ascidians show a peculiar affinity for vertebrates (Delsuc et al., Reference Delsuc, Brinkmann, Chourrout and Philippe2006), in particular C. intestinalis is a cosmopolitan ascidian used as a model for research on reproduction as it produces large numbers of synchronous gametes and has a short developmental cell cycle that is easy to follow and a clear larval stage with a particular larval metamorphosis. These characteristics together with its sessile and filter-feeders behaviour promotes it for consideration as a new model for ecological risk assessment.

In previous studies (Gallo et al., Reference Gallo, Silvestre, Cuomo, Papoff and Tosti2011; Gallo & Tosti, Reference Gallo and Tosti2013, Reference Gallo and Tosti2015c; Gallo et al., Reference Gallo, Boni, Buttino and Tosti2016), we have accumulated much evidence that C. intestinalis may represent a suitable bioindicator as its selective cellular response to pollutants in the long term may induce changes in its normal reproductive physiology. Its sensitivity to pollutants may partially explain the progressive reduction of C. intestinalis populations observed over the last 2 decades along the Neapolitan coast.

Conclusion

There is no doubt that environmental pollutants are able to impair the reproductive processes of a wide range of wildlife species. Study of effects of invertebrate exposure to chemicals deserves special attention as these animals represent 97% of all ecosystems and therefore their reproductive disorders may lead to a reduction in such populations. In view of the ecological importance of invertebrates, there is an urgent need to conduct more research in this area.

Here, it is shown that, in the ascidian C. intestinalis, different reproductive parameters such as oocyte ion current, FC, larval development and morphology were seriously affected by exposure to diverse marine pollutants.

Due to the high representative value of C. intestinalis (Sasakura et al., Reference Sasakura, Inaba, Satoh, Kondo and Akasaka2009) among the marine invertebrates, the availability of its complete genome and the close phylogenetic relationship between ascidians and vertebrates, the results reported here substantiate that ascidians may be considered a reliable model organism for reprotoxicological bioassays.

Acknowledgements

I thank Dr Elisabetta Tosti for her continuous support and advice. Thanks are also due to G.L. Zazo and M. Cannavacciuolo for providing ascidians, to A. Macina for maintaining the ascidians and to V. Monfrecola for technical assistance. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Alessandra Gallo's post-doctoral fellowship has been supported by Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn institutional funds.

Declaration of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

Alzieu, C. (2000). Impact of tributyltin on marine invertebrates. Ecotoxicology 9, 71–6.Google Scholar
Au, D. & Chiang, M. (2000). Effects of cadmium and phenol on motility and ultrastructure of sea urchin and mussel spermatozoa. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 38, 455–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beiras, R. & Albentosa, M. (2004). Inhibition of embryo development of the commercial bivalves Ruditapes decussatus and Mytilus galloprovincialis by trace metals; implications for the implementation of seawater quality criteria. Aquaculture 230, 205–13.Google Scholar
Bellas, J. (2005). Toxicity assessment of the antifouling compound zinc pyrithione using early developmental stages of the ascidian. Ciona intestinalis Biofouling. 21, 289–96.Google Scholar
Bellas, J. (2006). Comparative toxicity of alternative antifouling biocides on embryos and larvae of marine invertebrates. Sci. Total. Environ. 367, 573–85.Google Scholar
Bellas, J. (2007). Toxicity of the booster biocide Sea-Nine to the early developmental stages of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus . Aquat. Toxicol. 83, 5261.Google Scholar
Bellas, J., Vázquez, E. & Beiras, R. (2001). Toxicity of Hg, Cu, Cd, and Cr on early developmental stages of Ciona intestinalis (Chordata, Ascidiacea) with potential application in marine water quality assessment. Water Res. 35, 2905–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boni, R., Gallo, A., Montanino, M., Macina, A. & Tosti, E. (2016). Dynamic changes in the sperm quality of Mytilus galloprovincialis under continuous thermal stress. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 83, 162–73.Google Scholar
Brownlee, C. & Dale, B. (1990). Temporal and spatial correlation of fertilization current, calcium waves and cytoplasmic contraction in eggs of Ciona intestinalis . Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 239, 321–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Cima, F., Ballarin, L., Bressa, G., Martinucci, G. & Burighel, P. (1996). Toxicity of organotin compounds on embryos of a marine invertebrate (Styela plicata; tunicata). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 35, 174–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuomo, A., Silvestre, F., De Santis, R. & Tosti, E. (2006). Ca2+ and Na+ current patterns during oocyte maturation, fertilization, and early developmental stages of Ciona intestinalis . Mol. Reprod. Dev. 73, 501–11.Google Scholar
Dale, B. (1989). Fertilization in ascidians. In Nonmammalian Animal Models for Biomedical Research (eds Woodhead, A. & Vivirito, K.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 87 pp.Google Scholar
Dale, B. (1994). Oocyte activation in invertebrates and humans. Zygote 2, 373–7.Google Scholar
Dale, B. & De Felice, L. (1984). Sperm-activated channels in ascidian oocytes. Dev. Biol. 101, 235–9.Google Scholar
Danzo, B.J. (1997). Environmental xenobiotics may disrupt normal endocrine function by interfering with the binding of physiological ligands to steroid receptors and binding proteins. Environ. Health Perspect. 105, 294.Google Scholar
Danzo, B.J. (1998). The effects of environmental hormones on reproduction.. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 54, 1249–64.Google Scholar
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., Chourrout, D. & Philippe, H. (2006). Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature 439, 965–8.Google Scholar
Depledge, M., Weeks, J. & Bjerregaard, P. (1994). Heavy metals. In Handbook of Ecotoxicology (ed. Calow, P.), pp. 79105. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Falchuk, K. H. & Montorzi, M. (2001). Zinc physiology and biochemistry in oocytes and embryos. In Zinc Biochemistry, Physiology, and Homeostasis (ed. W. Maret) pp. 199209. The Netherlands: Springer .Google Scholar
Fernández, N. & Beiras, R. (2001). Combined toxicity of dissolved mercury with copper, lead and cadmium on embryogenesis and early larval growth of the Paracentrotus lividus sea-urchin. Ecotoxicology 10, 263–71.Google Scholar
Ferrer, L., Andrade, S., Asteasuain, R. & Marcovecchio, J. (2006). Acute toxicities of four metals on the early life stages of the crab Chasmagnathus granulata from Bahia Blanca estuary, Argentina. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 65, 209–17.Google Scholar
Franchet, C., Goudeau, M. & Goudeau, H. (1999). Tributyltin impedes early sperm-egg interactions at the egg coat level in the ascidian Phallusia mammillata but does not prevent sperm-egg fusion in naked eggs. Aquat. Toxicol. 44, 213–28.Google Scholar
Gallo, A. & Tosti, E. (2013). Adverse effect of antifouling compounds on the reproductive mechanisms of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis . Mar. Drugs 11, 3554–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallo, A. & Tosti, E. (2015a). The ascidian Ciona intestinalis as model organism for ecotoxicological bioassays. J. Marine Sci. Res. Dev. 5, e138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, A. & Tosti, E. (2015b). Ion currents involved in gamete physiology. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 59, 261–70.Google Scholar
Gallo, A. & Tosti, E. (2015c). Reprotoxicity of the antifoulant chlorothalonil in ascidians: an ecological risk assessment. PLoS ONE 10, e0123074.Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, S., Thilagam, H. & Raja, P. (2007). Toxicity of heavy metals on embryogenesis and larvae of the marine sedentary polychaete Hydroides elegans . Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 52, 171–8.Google Scholar
Gallo, A., Silvestre, F., Cuomo, A., Papoff, F. & Tosti, E. (2011). The impact of metals on the reproductive mechanisms of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Mar. Ecol. 32, 222–31.Google Scholar
Gallo, A., Boni, R., Buttino, I. & Tosti, E. (2016). Spermiotoxicity of nickel nanoparticles in the marine invertebrate Ciona intestinalis (ascidians). Nanotoxicology 10, 1096–104.Google Scholar
Gallo, A., Boni, R. & Tosti, E. (2018). Sperm viability assessment in marine invertebrates by fluorescent staining and spectrofluorimetry: A promising tool for assessing marine pollution impact. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 147, 407–12.Google Scholar
Henson, M. C. & Chedrese, P. J. (2004). Endocrine disruption by cadmium, a common environmental toxicant with paradoxical effects on reproduction. Exp. Biol. Med. 229, 383–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, E. A. & Miller, S. W. (2011). Bioindicators: using organisms to measure environmental impacts. Nature Education Knowledge 3, 8.Google Scholar
Itow, T., Loveland, R. & Botton, M. (1998). Developmental abnormalities in horseshoe crab embryos caused by exposure to heavy metals. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 35, 3340.Google Scholar
Manzo, S. (2004). Sea urchin embryotoxicity test: proposal for a simplified bioassay. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 57, 123–8.Google Scholar
Martin, M., Osborn, K. E., Billig, P. & Glickstein, N. (1981). Toxicities of ten metals to Crassostrea gigas and Mytilus edulis embryos and Cancer magister larvae. Mar. Poll. Bull. 12, 305–8.Google Scholar
Matranga, V. & Corsi, I. (2012). Toxic effects of engineered nanoparticles in the marine environment: model organisms and molecular approaches. Mar. Environ. Res. 76, 3240.Google Scholar
Nacci, D., Jackim, E. & Walsh, R. (1986). Comparative evaluation of three rapid marine toxicity tests: sea urchin early embryo growth test, sea urchin sperm cell toxicity test and Microtox. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 5, 521–5.Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, C. & Kanias, G. D. (1977). Tunicate species as marine pollution indicators. Mar. Poll. Bull. 8, 229–31.Google Scholar
Patricolo, E., Mansueto, C., D'Agati, P. & Pellerito, L. (2001). Organometallic complexes with biological molecules: XVI. Endocrine disruption effects of tributyltin (IV) chloride on metamorphosis of the ascidian larva. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 15, 916–23.Google Scholar
Pennati, R., Groppelli, S., Zega, G., Biggiogero, M., De Bernardi, F. & Sotgia, C. (2006). Toxic effects of two pesticides, Imazalil and Triadimefon, on the early development of the ascidian Phallusia mammillata (Chordata, Ascidiacea). Aquat. Toxicol. 79, 205–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popek, W., Dietrich, G., Glogowski, J., Demska-Zakeś, K., Drag-Kozak, E., Sionkowski, J., Łuszczek-Trojan, E., Epler, P., Demianowicz, W. & Sarosiek, B. (2005). Influence of heavy metals and 4-nonylphenol on reproductive function in fish. Reprod. Biol. 6, 175–88.Google Scholar
Porte, C., Janer, G., Lorusso, L., Ortiz-Zarragoitia, M., Cajaraville, M., Fossi, M. & Canesi, L. (2006). Endocrine disruptors in marine organisms: approaches and perspectives. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 143, 303–15.Google Scholar
Sasakura, Y., Inaba, K., Satoh, N., Kondo, M. & Akasaka, K. (2009). Ciona intestinalis and Oxycomanthus japonicus, representatives of marine invertebrates. Exp. Anim. 58, 459–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satoh, N. (1994). Developmental Biology of Ascidians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segner, H. (2009). Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a model organism for investigating endocrine disruption. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 149, 187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvestre, F., Cuomo, A. & Tosti, E. (2009). Ion current activity and molecules modulating maturation and growth stages of ascidian (Ciona intestinalis) oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 76, 1084–93.Google Scholar
Tosti, E. & Boni, R. (2004). Electrical events during gamete maturation and fertilization in animals and humans. Hum. Reprod. Update 10, 5365.Google Scholar
Tosti, E., Gallo, A. & Silvestre, F. (2011). Ion currents involved in oocyte maturation, fertilization and early developmental stages of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis . Mol. Reprod. Dev. 78, 854–60.Google Scholar
Tosti, E. & Ménézo, Y. (2016). Gamete activation: basic knowledge and clinical applications. Hum. Reprod. Update 22, 420–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villa, L., Agati, P., Mansueto, C., Pellerito, C., Scopelliti, M., Fiore, T., Nagy, L. & Pellerito, L. (2003). Effects of tributyltin (IV) chloride on the gametes and fertilization of Ascidia malaca (Ascidiacea: Tunicata). Appl. Organomet. Chem. 17, 106–12.Google Scholar
Voulvoulis, N., Scrimshaw, M. & Lester, J. (1999). Alternative antifouling biocides. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 13, 135–43.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Liu, B., Yang, H., Wang, X. & Lin, Z. (2009). Toxicity of lead, cadmium and mercury on embryogenesis, survival, growth and metamorphosis of Meretrix meretrix larvae. Ecotoxicology 18, 829–37.Google Scholar
Waykar, B. & Deshmukh, G. (2012). Evaluation of bivalves as bioindicators of metal pollution in freshwater. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 88, 4853.Google Scholar
Wong, C., Chu, K., Tang, K., Tam, T. & Wong, L. (1993). Effects of chromium, copper and nickel on survival and feeding behaviour of Metapenaeus ensis larvae and postlarvae (Decapoda: Penaeidae). Mar. Environ. Res. 36, 6378.Google Scholar
Wurl, O. & Obbard, J. P. (2004). A review of pollutants in the sea-surface microlayer (SML): a unique habitat for marine organisms. Mar. Poll. Bull. 48, 1016–30.Google Scholar
Yamada, H. (2007). Behaviour, occurrence, and aquatic toxicity of new antifouling biocides and preliminary assessment of risk to aquatic ecosystems. Bull. Fish. Res. Dev. Agency 21, 3145.Google Scholar
Zega, G., De Bernardi, F., Groppelli, S. & Pennati, R. (2009a). Effects of the azole fungicide Imazalil on the development of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis (Chordata, Tunicata): morphological and molecular characterization of the induced phenotype. Aquat. Toxicol. 91, 255–61.Google Scholar
Zega, G., Pennati, R., Candiani, S., Pestarino, M. & De Bernardi, F. (2009b). Solitary ascidians embryos (Chordata, Tunicata) as model organisms for testing coastal pollutant toxicity. Invertebr. Surviv. J 6, S29–34.Google Scholar
Zhou, Q., Zhang, J., Fu, J., Shi, J. & Jiang, G. (2008). Biomonitoring: an appealing tool for assessment of metal pollution in the aquatic ecosystem. Anal. Chim. Acta 606, 135–50.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Organic tin compound and phenylurea effects on C. intestinalis fertilization. Fertilization rate (A) and percentage of normal larvae (B, C) obtained after fertilization in organic tin compound and phenylurea DCMU solutions, respectively. Solid circles represent the mean of 10 experiments, and the solid line indicates the fit of the experimental data to the logistic model. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Organic tin compound and phenylurea effects on C. intestinalis larval development. (A) Normal larvae at 24 h post fertilization developed from oocytes fertilized in NSW. (B) Embryo developed in organic tin solution arrested at different developmental stages. Abnormal larvae developed from oocytes fertilized in organic tin (C) and the phenylurea DCMU (D) solution at different concentrations showing various degrees of malformations such as abnormal heads and stunted and coiled tails. Bar represents 100 µm.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Effect of xenobiotics on C. intestinalis oocyte Na+ current. Na+ current amplitude after 30 min exposure of oocytes to different concentrations of lead (A), zinc (B), organic tin compound (C) and phenylurea DCMU (D). Solid circles represent the mean of replicates for all treatments, and the solid line indicates the fit of the experimental data to the logistic model. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).

Figure 3

Figure 4 Organic tin compound effect on C. intestinalis fertilization current (FC). The frequency of FC recorded in oocytes after 30 min exposure to different concentrations of organic tin compound was reduced in a concentration-dependent manner. Solid circles represent the mean of replicates for all treatments, and the solid line indicates the fit of the experimental data to the logistic model. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD).