Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T05:46:06.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigating the Effect of Perceived Social Support on the Promotion of Earthquake-Related Awareness in Iranian High School Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2022

Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Mahmoudreza Peyravi
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Hassan Khaledi*
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Vahid Saadatmand
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Farahnaz Khaledi
Affiliation:
Payame Noor University, Kharameh, Shiraz, Iran
*
Correspondence: Hassan Khaledi Mahmoudreza Peyravi Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies School of Health Management and Information Sciences Shiraz University of Medical SciencesShiraz, Iran E-mails: khaledihassan66@yahoo.com and peyravi110@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction and Objective:

Students are one of the groups in society that are always exposed to earthquake-related hazards. Perceived social support plays a major role in students’ self-efficacy to respond appropriately to earthquakes. Social support affects students’ beliefs about their abilities and enhances their performance during earthquakes. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the effect of perceived social support on the promotion of earthquake-related awareness amongst high school students.

Methods:

The present educational intervention with a randomized control group was conducted on 64 high school students in Lordegan, Iran. The participants were randomly divided into an intervention and a control group. Earthquake-related awareness index and perceived social support were completed by the two groups before, immediately after, and two months after the intervention. The intervention group received 120-minute educational intervention sessions once a week for four weeks. The data were entered into the SPSS 20 software and were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods.

Results:

According to the results, educational intervention was effective in improving the perceived social support. The results also showed that increasing the perceived social support significantly improved the earthquake-related awareness among the high school students in the intervention group compared to the control group after the intervention (P <.001).

Conclusion:

The findings revealed that perceived social support played a major role in promoting earthquake-related awareness in the high school students. Due to the accuracy of the study, these results can be considered in future investigations.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Introduction

Earthquakes are one of the most unpredictable and destructive natural disasters that affect people’s lives and cause much human and financial losses. Reference Fung and Loke1 Therefore, it is considered a serious danger to people’s lives. Reference Canoo and Morsell2 Earthquakes have been one of the most important natural disasters due to their destructive effects throughout human history. Reference Ganapati and Ganapati3 The main effects of this phenomenon include the destruction of man-made buildings and structures, which causes death, severe injuries, homelessness, and other social problems. Reference Hussar4 Earthquake refers to the movement of the earth that occurs in a short time due to the release of energy as a result of rapid rupture in faults in the earth’s crust. Reference Chen, Feihuan, Edward and Shyr5 More than one million earthquakes occur around the world annually. Reference Dirkzwager, Kerssens and Yzermans6 Based on a global scale, earthquakes and tsunamis have killed more than 400,000 people and affected 46 million over the past 20 years. Reference Foltin, Schonfeld and Shannon7 Iran is located in an earthquake-prone region of the world and numerous catastrophic earthquakes have been recorded in its history. Reference Mehraein, Goli and Mohajervatan8 Over the past 90 years, more than 180,000 people have died in numerous earthquakes. Reference Poursaid and Khormaei9 The Bam earthquake (2003) killed more than 30,000 people, injured more than 10,000 individuals, left more than 100,000 people homeless, and led to the loss of more than $800 million. Reference Kankea, Amnat, Hossaini, Sadeghi and Aghighi10

Earthquakes, per se, do not have any adverse consequences, but what makes this phenomenon a disaster is the unpreparedness to cope with its consequences. Reference Ramezani, Khamesan and Rastgomoghaddam11 As long as the safety of human beings, their society, and habitats against earthquakes are not guaranteed sufficiently, they will cause harmful and critical consequences. Reference Kubicek, Ramirez, Limbos and Iverson12 The experience of developed countries confirms that the effects of this natural phenomenon can be greatly reduced with careful planning. Reference Chang, Wilkinson, Brunsdon, Seville and Potangaroa13 Disaster elimination is impossible, but the risk of events and disasters can be reduced with preparedness to cope with such events. Reference Hayles14 Education is another way to increase preparedness and reduce the destructive effects of earthquakes. Reference Yarmohammadzadeh and Faiz Elahi15 Education can also help reduce the negative psychological effects of natural disasters. Reference Vojinovic and van Teeffelen16 Students are one of the groups in society that are always exposed to earthquake-related hazards. Reference Wilks17 In this regard, continuous and on-going education is essential for students to prepare themselves for earthquakes, a missing link in the earthquake crisis management cycle. Reference Rasell and Shimba18 On the other hand, government in disaster management has limited resources in terms of human resources and facilities. Reference Ronald, Esther, Burke and Konarski19 Hence, it is possible to prepare students to cope with earthquakes at school and at home via education and training. Reference Kubicek, Ramirez and Limbos20 Thus, the most important step in managing the earthquake crisis in schools is education to enhance students’ knowledge and public awareness. Reference Sayers and Riagel21

Earthquake education refers to a set of appropriate strategies designed before the earthquake to raise awareness and teach practical skills by generalization to the whole society. Reference Dorosh, Malik and Krausova22 Continuous education can eliminate the fear of the suddenness of the earthquake and its consequences among students. By maintaining preparedness during earthquakes, students’ relaxation and peace of mind to decide and implement the safety tips, which is the most important component to save individuals and the society, are maintained. Reference Jeyanth and Godfrey23 In earthquake education, students are exposed to an accident situation, which allows them to learn the ways of coping with earthquakes and to use these experiences throughout their lives and during earthquakes. Reference Blessman, Skupski and Jamil24 In other words, education can untie the knots created in an accident such as an earthquake and students can rely on these teachings and learnings to cope with the accident calmly and confidently to reduce casualties and psychological damages during and after events. Reference Heathers and Perkins25 Taking earthquake education seriously, purposefulness, and as a continuation of this education for students and families by increasing their quality and quantity can always be an important issue in the plans made by the officials of educational centers. Reference Rautela26 It can lead to more solidarity between parents and schools, eventually reducing human casualties. Reference Haigh and Sutton27 In fact, being prepared and knowing what to do in the event of an earthquake can save the lives of many people during an incident. Reference Koelling and Bennett28

Various factors including preparedness, awareness, and self-efficacy affect the self-efficacy of students to respond appropriately to sudden events, especially earthquakes. One of these factors is social support, which affects individuals’ beliefs in their abilities and enhances their performance in the face of disasters. Reference Lorig, Perkins and David29 Social support has been defined as the reception of affection, attention, and assistance of family members, friends, and other people. Reference Daniel and Bart30 In addition, perceived support refers to a personal perception of the availability of support, an adequate assessment of support, and the quality of support when needed. Reference Jennifer, Sullivan and Laura31 The mental aspect of social support can provide effective psychological assistance to a person to cope with the pressures and problems of life. Reference Bornstein32 Since these people have a clear idea in their minds that there are people who help them in all moments of life, they resist the adversities more strongly. Reference Halvorson and Hamilton33

As mentioned earlier, it is crucial for students to behave properly during an earthquake. Therefore, implementing educational programs for students and their families can serve as a guide for macro-level planning. The present study aims to investigate the effects of an educational program on social support and earthquake-related awareness in high school students in Lordegan, Iran in 2021.

Methods

Participants

This quasi-experimental research was conducted on 64 high school students divided into an intervention and a control group in 2021. Thirty-two students were in the control group and 32 students were in the intervention group, all of whom remained in the study until the end of the study (Table 1).

Table 1. Number of Students Participating in Different Stages of the Study

The study population included all the high school students in Lordegan. The inclusion criteria of the study were living in Lordegan, being willing to participate in the study, and not taking part in other similar educational programs.

Data Collection Tool

The measurement tools included a demographic information questionnaire, a perceived social support questionnaire, and an earthquake-related questionnaire.

The perceived social support questionnaire contained 12 questions scored on a seven-point Likert scale. The first question of this scale was “When I need, there is always a special person beside me.” Scores of one through seven were assigned to: (1) “I completely disagree,” (2) “I disagree,” (3) “I relatively disagree,” (4) “I have no idea,” (5) “I relatively agree,” (6) “I agree,” and (7) “I completely agree,” respectively. Thus, the total score of perceived social support could range from 12 to 84, with higher scores indicating a better perceived social support status. Zimmet, et al reported the alpha reliability coefficient of the scale as 0.85-0.91 and its test–re-test reliability as 0.72-0.85. Reference Canty-Mitchell and Zimet34 In Iran, this questionnaire was used by Davari, et al and its reliability was confirmed by using the test–re-test method (0.895) and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient method (87%). Reference Davaridolatabadi and Cheraghi35

The earthquake-related awareness index consisted of 22 questions, the first 21 of which were yes/no items. Scores one and two were given to “no” and “yes” options, respectively. Therefore, the earthquake-related awareness scores could range from 21 to 42, with higher scores representing better awareness. In the study conducted by Huberman, et al, the correlation coefficient was reported as 0.94 using the test–re-test method and 89% using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Reference Hoberman, Sandoval and Chen36 This instrument was also used by Mehraein, et al in Iran and its Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were obtained as 0.86 and 0.94, respectively. Reference Mehraein, Goli and Mohajervatan8

Data Collection Method

To carry out the study, ten high schools (five female high schools and five male high schools) were randomly selected from the 20 female high schools and 18 male high schools in the city. Then, eligible students were selected and the research objectives and procedures were explained to them. After obtaining their written informed consent, they were requested to complete a questionnaire on demographic information, earthquake-related awareness, and perceived social support. They were asked not to participate in similar counseling and training programs during this study and to continue their normal lives. Then, they were randomly divided into an intervention and a control group.

To measure the effectiveness of the program, one of the closest family members entered the group sessions. In this group, emphasis was put on earthquake education, appropriate behaviors and actions before, during, and after the earthquake, and the role of family support in improving these behaviors. In this way, the researcher aimed to activate family support for the students through the presence of a family member in the education sessions. The intervention group was divided into three groups: two groups of 11 and one group of 10. Each group participated in training sessions once a week on different days. Four two-hour therapeutic sessions were also held for each group. Immediately after the completion of the four sessions, all the participants were invited to the study site and were required to complete the aforementioned questionnaires again. Two months later, they were invited to the study site again for follow-up and were asked to complete the mentioned questionnaires once again. During these two months, a text message was sent to the students’ companions every week to strengthen the supportive behaviors. Finally, the obtained data were analyzed.

Data Analysis Method

The data were analyzed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney, independent t-test, repeated measures analysis of variance, and analysis of covariance. All statistical analyzes were performed at 95% confidence interval.

Ethical Considerations

This article was extracted from a research work approved by Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences (Shahrekord, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Iran; code: IR.SKUMS.REC.1400.218). Sampling was started after the researcher submitted a letter of introduction to Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. The objectives of the study were explained to the participants. The participants had the right to withdraw from the study at any stage. The participants were assured that their information would remain confidential. The obtained information was analyzed without bias. Each participant and parent provided consent to participate; a parent also consented to have their child participate.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 17.5 (SD = 6.7) years (17.4 [SD = 6.7] in the intervention group and 17.6 [SD = 7.2] in the control group). The results revealed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic information such as age, gender, and education level (P = .802).

Before the intervention, the results of independent t-test showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding the status of perceived social support (P = .48). After the intervention, however, the mean Q1 and Q3 scores of perceived social support were higher in the intervention group than in the control group immediately and two months after the intervention (P <.001; Table 2 and Table 3).

Table 2. The Mean Scores of Perceived Social Support Before and After the Intervention

Table 3. The Q1 and Q3 Scores of Perceived Social Support Before and After the Intervention

The results of paired t-test indicated no significant difference in the control group’s mean Q1 and Q3 scores of perceived social support before and two months after the intervention (P = .41). However, the results of repeated measures analysis of variance showed a significant difference in the intervention group’s mean Q1 and Q3 scores of perceived social support before, immediately after, and two months after the intervention (P <.001). The results of the least significant difference post hoc test demonstrated that the students’ mean Q1 and Q3 scores of perceived social support increased significantly immediately after the intervention compared to before the intervention (P <.001), but decreased two months after the intervention compared to immediately after the intervention (P = .001). However, the mean Q1 and Q3 scores were significantly higher two months after the intervention compared to before the intervention (P <.001; Table 2 and Table 3).

The results of independent t-test showed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean Q1 and Q3 scores of earthquake-related awareness before the intervention (P = .51). After the educational intervention, however, the mean Q1 and Q3 scores of earthquake-related awareness were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group immediately and two months after the intervention (P <.001; Table 4 and Table 5).

Table 4. The Mean Score of Earthquake-Related Awareness Before and After the Intervention

Table 5. The Q1 and Q3 Scores of Earthquake-Related Awareness Before and After the Intervention

The results of paired t-test revealed no significant difference in the control group’s mean Q1 and Q3 scores of earthquake-related awareness before and two months after the intervention (P = .36). However, repeated measures analysis of variance indicated a significant difference in the intervention group’s mean Q1 and Q3 scores of earthquake-related awareness at three-times (P <.001). The results of the least significant difference post hoc test showed that the mean Q1 and Q3 scores of earthquake-related awareness increased significantly immediately after the intervention compared to before the intervention (P <.001), but decreased two months after the intervention compared to immediately after the intervention (P = .01). However, its mean Q1 and Q3 scores were significantly higher two months after the intervention compared to before the intervention (P <.001; Table 4 and Table 5).

Discussion

The results of this study demonstrated that improving perceived social support could improve earthquake-related awareness among the high school students in the intervention group. Perceived social support can provide effective psychological assistance to a person to cope with the pressures and problems of life. Reference Bornstein32 These results were in line with those of several other studies in this area. For example, Daniel and Barat evaluated the impact of social support on physical and mental health amongst 180 high school students in Chicago (Illinois USA) and disclosed that an increase in social support was accompanied by an increase in the levels of physical and mental health. Reference Daniel and Bart30

In another study, Chen, et al assessed the impact of social support on emotional awareness amongst 632 Taiwanese students. The results revealed that educational programs for strengthening social support had a positive effect on emotional awareness. Reference Chen, Feihuan, Edward and Shyr5

Pourseyed, et al also investigated the relationship between personality traits and perceived social support and appreciation mediated by academic stress and academic self-efficacy among 474 high school students. The results showed that among the dimensions of social support perceived as the second exogenous variable, appreciation was predicted directly by others’ support and family support and indirectly by family support through academic stress and academic self-efficacy. In other words, perceived personality traits and social support reduced individuals’ academic stress and low-stress individuals had higher self-efficacy in coping with academic problems. That study was in line with the present one in terms of evaluating social support among students, but it investigated the effect of social support on academic stress. Reference Poursaid and Khormaei9

In another study, Ramezani, et al explored the role of academic self-regulatory mediators in the relationship between perceived social support by teachers and academic engagement among 258 high school students in Birjand, Iran. The results showed that the perceived social support by teachers had a significant positive effect on students’ academic engagement through the mediating role of academic self-regulation. Thus, students’ perception of teacher’s support had a crucial role in strengthening their self-regulatory skills and increasing their academic engagement. In that study, the relationship between teacher’s support and academic engagement was determined, but the present study assessed the impact of perceived social support on earthquake-related awareness in high school students. Reference Ramezani, Khamesan and Rastgomoghaddam11

Yarmohammad Zadeh and Feyzollahi investigated the relationship between social support and academic motivation and academic self-efficacy amongst 37,347 high school students in Tabriz, Iran and Azarshahr, Iran. The findings revealed a significant relationship between social support and academic motivation and self-efficacy. Accordingly, social support and academic motivation could significantly predict academic self-efficacy, with social support playing a more critical role. These results were in agreement with those of the present research concerning the positive impact of social support. However, the two studies were different in terms of the relationship between social support and academic motivation. Reference Yarmohammadzadeh and Faiz Elahi15

Scott, et al evaluated the relationship between academic stress and perceived resilience among students and identified social support as a protective factor for resilience among 314 students from three schools in the southern United States. The results showed moderate levels of academic stress and social support and relatively high levels of resilience. Academic stress was negatively associated with social support and resilience. In addition, social support had a positive effect on resilience. Moreover, friends’ support significantly moderated the negative relationship between academic stress and resilience. That study was consistent with the present one regarding the assessment of the role of social support, but they were different with respect to methods and objectives. Reference Wilks17

According to the results, it is recommended to:

  1. 1. Hold training sessions and perform maneuvers to prepare students for earthquakes continuously;

  2. 2. Hold training sessions for students to prepare them for other disasters (ie, floods and fires) continuously and purposefully;

  3. 3. Incorporate disaster preparedness in students’ curricula; and

  4. 4. Design a scientific application to promote social support in students and to increase the interaction between families and schools.

Limitations

Limitations of this study include: (1) small sample size; (2) collecting data through self-report tools; and (3) the sessions were conducted by the researcher, thus there might be an unwanted bias on the part of the researcher to confirm the research hypotheses.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicated that improving perceived social support could improve earthquake-related awareness among the high school students in the intervention group.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Author Contributions

Hassan Khaledi and Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh were responsible for the study conception and design. Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh supervised the whole thesis. All authors prepared the first draft of the manuscript. All authors did the data analysis, made critical revisions to the paper for important intellectual content, and supervised the study. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Ms. A. Keivanshekouh at the Research Consultation Center (RCC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for her invaluable assistance in editing the manuscript. They also are grateful to the Research Vice-Chancellor of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences for cooperation and assistance in conducting this study.

Footnotes

Note: Hassan Khaledi and Mahmoudreza Peyravi have had the same contribution and both are corresponding author.

References

Fung, OWM, Loke, AY. Disaster preparedness of families with young children in Hong Kong. Scand J Public Health. 2019;38(8):880888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canoo, M, Morsell, R. Implications of hospital evacuation after the Northridge, California, earthquake. N Engl J Med. 2020; 348(14):19701976.Google Scholar
Ganapati, NE, Ganapati, S. Enabling participatory planning after disasters. J American Planning Association. 2019;75(1):4159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussar, AJ. Emergency preparedness in personal care homes. University of Pittsburgh; 2007. www.scholar.google.com. Accessed July 2018;2(3):122-128.Google Scholar
Chen, N, Feihuan, K, Edward, C, Shyr, Y. Job demand, emotional awareness, and job satisfaction in internships: the moderating effect of social support. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2020;37(910):1426.Google Scholar
Dirkzwager, AJE, Kerssens, JJ, Yzermans, CJ. Health problems in children and adolescents before and after a man-made disaster. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019;45(1):94103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltin, GL, Schonfeld, DJ, Shannon, MW. Pediatric terrorism and disaster preparedness. Am Acad Pediat. 2018;11(2):3345.Google Scholar
Mehraein, Z, Goli, A, Mohajervatan, A. Assessing the level of awareness of high school students in Shiraz to face the risk of earthquakes. Environmental Risk Management. 2017;3(4):331344.Google Scholar
Poursaid, M, Khormaei, F. The effect of personality traits and perceived social support on appreciation mediated by stress and academic self-efficacy in high school students. Journal of Positive Psychology. 2018;4(16):2544.Google Scholar
Kankea, H, Amnat, N, Hossaini, MA, Sadeghi, AA, Aghighi, A. The effect of earthquake response training for high school male students on household readiness in Eshtehard City. Quarterly Journal of Rescue and Relief. 2018;5(3):4253.Google Scholar
Ramezani, M, Khamesan, A, Rastgomoghaddam, M. The relationship between teacher perceived social support and academic conflict: the mediating role of academic self-regulation. Social Innovation Quarterly. 2018;17(168):9299.Google Scholar
Kubicek, K, Ramirez, M, Limbos, MA, Iverson, E. Knowledge and behaviors of parents in planning for and dealing with emergencies. J Community Health. 2008;33(3):158168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, Y, Wilkinson, S, Brunsdon, D, Seville, E, Potangaroa, R. An integrated approach: managing resources for post-disaster reconstruction. Disasters. 2018;35(4):739765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, CS. An examination of decision making in post disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment. 2020;1(1):103122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarmohammadzadeh, P, Faiz Elahi, Z. Determining the relationship between social support, academic motivation and academic self-efficacy of high school students in Tabriz and Azarshahr. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2018;27(16):157169.Google Scholar
Vojinovic, Z, van Teeffelen, J. An integrated stormwater management approach for small islands in tropical climates. Urban Water Journal. 2019;4(3):211231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, SE. Resilience amid academic stress: the moderating impact of social support among social work students. Advances in Social Work. 2020;14(2):148159.Google Scholar
Rasell, E, Shimba, J. Japan-Romania knowledge transfer for earthquake disaster prevention preparedness of citizens in Bucharest. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment. 2018;40(18):4555.Google Scholar
Ronald, J, Esther, R, Burke, GS, Konarski, R. The impact of social support on the development of burnout in teachers: examination of a model. An International Journal of Work, Health, and Organizations. 2021;2(11):267278.Google Scholar
Kubicek, K, Ramirez, M, Limbos, MA, et al. Knowledge and behaviors of parents in planning for and dealing with emergencies. Insiders Making Cities Resilient Campaign. 2018;14(11):322368.Google Scholar
Sayers, SL, Riagel, B. Social support and self-care in disaster. Annal Behavioral in Disaster. 2018;3(5):7079.Google Scholar
Dorosh, P, Malik, SJ, Krausova, M. Rehabilitating agriculture and promoting food security after the 2010 Pakistan floods: insights from the south Asian experience. Pakistan Development Review. 2019;49(3):167192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeyanth, KN, Godfrey, GPJ. Community participation and public awareness in disaster mitigation. Disaster Prevention and Management. 2019;12(1):3336.Google Scholar
Blessman, J, Skupski, J, Jamil, M, et al. Barriers to at-home preparedness in public health employees: implications for disaster preparedness training. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;49(3):318326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathers, L, Perkins, B. Social support and disaster: epidemiological evidence and implication for treatment. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2018;67(4):869878.Google Scholar
Rautela, P. Risk management for vibrant economic growth and sustained development. Disaster Prevention and Management. 2020;15(4):585597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haigh, R, Sutton, G. Strategies for the effective engagement of multi-national construction enterprises in post-disaster building and infrastructure projects. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment. 2021;3(3):270282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koelling, M, Bennett, S. Education improves behaviors in students. Circulation. 2016;111:179185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorig, R, Perkins, S, David, D. Effectiveness education on self-management program can improve health status. International Journal of Project Management. 2019;37:514.Google Scholar
Daniel, C, Bart, G. The impact of social support on mental and physical health. Br J Med Psychol. 2019;6(8):121133.Google Scholar
Jennifer, J, Sullivan, D, Laura, W. The support, education, can improve the self-care to reduce the risk of disaster. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Special Paper. 2019;157(3):8490.Google Scholar
Bornstein, L, et al. Framing responses to post-earthquake Haiti: how representations of disasters, reconstruction, and human settlements shape resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment. 2018;4(1):4357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorson, SJ, Hamilton, P. In the aftermath of the Qa’yamat: the Kashmir earthquake disaster in northern Pakistan. Disasters. 2019;34(1):184204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canty-Mitchell, J, Zimet, G. Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2018;5(2):3041.Google Scholar
Davaridolatabadi, E, Cheraghi, MA. Designation of Special Tools of Perceived Social Support. In: Taabib A, (Editor). Tehran, Iran: 17th Congress of Iranian Heart Association; 2019.Google Scholar
Hoberman, G, Sandoval, V, Chen, W. Performance evaluation in the Kashmir earthquake of October 8, 2005: impacts in Pakistan. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Special Paper. 2019;8(6):1522.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Number of Students Participating in Different Stages of the Study

Figure 1

Table 2. The Mean Scores of Perceived Social Support Before and After the Intervention

Figure 2

Table 3. The Q1 and Q3 Scores of Perceived Social Support Before and After the Intervention

Figure 3

Table 4. The Mean Score of Earthquake-Related Awareness Before and After the Intervention

Figure 4

Table 5. The Q1 and Q3 Scores of Earthquake-Related Awareness Before and After the Intervention