Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:46:12.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Autecology, feeding preferences and reproductive biology of Chorthippus (Glyptobothrus) vagans (Eversmann, 1848) (Orthoptera: Gomphocerinae) in Mediterranean ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2016

A.M. Cárdenas*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Córdoba, Campus Rabanales, E-14071, Spain
P. Gallardo
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Córdoba, Campus Rabanales, E-14071, Spain
L. Moyano
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Córdoba, Campus Rabanales, E-14071, Spain
J.J. Presa
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Anthropology, University of Murcia, Campus Espinardo, E-30100, Spain
*
*Author for correspondence Tel/Fax: +34 957 218604 E-mail: ba1cataa@uco.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chorthippus vagans is a common species of Gomphocerinae (Orthoptera) on the Iberian Peninsula. It is endangered in Central Europe where information about its ecological requirements is available; however, aspects of its biology are almost unknown in Mediterranean ecosystems, where it is widespread and common. The focus of this study was to determine how C. vagans adjusts its biology to environmental features of this ecosystem and to interpret how it may be affected by the ecological changes related to the re-vegetation programme linked to the construction of the Breña dam (SW Spain). The research parameters included the autoecology, feeding response and some aspects of reproduction of this species in the Southern Iberian Peninsula. To determine the local distribution and phenology of C. vagans, monthly samplings were conducted (2007–2010) in 12 sampling plots. For the food selection tests, ten nymphs and ten adults were placed individually in insectaries under controlled conditions. Grasses (Lolium sp.) and shrubs (Cistus sp.) were supplied ad libitum in two types of tests, monospecific and mixed diet. The reproductive biology was analysed by both observations of anatomical structures (integument, bristles, tibial spines, tarsal claws and mandibles) and ovarian dissections of 29 females and in laboratory rearing experiments with 15 pairs of adults. The results indicate that C. vagans shows an extended activity period which peaks at the end of summer. It is a polyphagous grasshopper, although adults show a slight preference for grasses. In addition, it is a univoltine species with spring–summer breeding activity.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Introduction

Chorthippus (Glyptobothrus) vagans (Eversmann, 1848) is a grasshopper (Orthoptera, Acrididae) belonging to the Subfamily Gomphocerinae, widely distributed on the Palaearctic Region. Nevertheless, its distribution area in Central Europe is regressive and quite fragmented because this species has suffered a large decline over recent decades due to extensive changes in land use and eutrophication and degradation of heathlands. For this reason, the species is included in the red list of several European countries (Proess & Meyer, Reference Proess and Meyer2003; Lock et al., Reference Lock, Adriaens, Devreise, San Martin and Decleer2011; Maas et al., Reference Maas, Detzel and Staudt2011; Bakker et al., Reference Bakker, Bouwman, Brekelmans, Colijn, Felix, Grutters, Kerkhof and Kleukers2015; Sutton, Reference Sutton2015). In addition, this species is considered ‘vulnerable’ in Austria (Berg et al., Reference Berg, Bieringer, Zechner and Zulka2005).

On the Iberian Peninsula generally, as well as in the studied area, it still is a rather common and widely distributed species (Llucià-Pomares & Fernández-Ortín, Reference Llucià-Pomares and Fernández-Ortín2009). It is active throughout the year, except in the coldest months (García, Reference García1984; García & Presa, Reference García and Presa1985). This flexible life cycle enables C. vagans to colonize very different biotopes such as sands and dunes with bushes, pine forests, cork and holm oak forests, wet forests, grasslands and cleared shrub, among others (Presa et al., Reference Presa, Montes and Ramírez-Díaz1983; Llucià-Pomares, Reference Llucià-Pomares2002; Olmo-Vidal, Reference Olmo-Vidal2002), and also ecotones or transitional zones (Hochkirch et al., Reference Hochkirch, Gärtner and Brandt2008).

There is information about some aspects of the genetics (Cabrero & Camacho, Reference Cabrero and Camacho1987; Cerro & Santos, Reference Cerro and Santos1995) and population dynamics in response to environmental management (Hochkirch et al., Reference Hochkirch, Gärtner and Brandt2008), and nutritional ecology of C. vagans in diverse areas from the European continent (Treiber, Reference Treiber and Detzel1998, Reference Treiber2001; Steiner, Reference Steiner2006).

The current knowledge of the biology of C. vagans in Mediterranean ecosystems is mainly based on field observations of the habitat or the activity pattern, and there is no available information about other significant aspects such as trophic preferences or reproductive biology. Food selection seems to determine distribution in the biotope of many phytophagous species (Sheldon & Rogers, Reference Sheldon and Rogers1978; Joern & Lawlor, Reference Joern and Lawlor1981), although this factor is less important for Orthoptera, which are usually polyphagous and more specialized on certain vegetation structures and microclimates. In addition, plant selection depends on their palatability which, in turn, is determined by leaf qualities (physical, chemical or nutritional; Otte & Joern, Reference Otte and Joern1977; Muralirangan & Muralirangan, Reference Muralirangan and Muralirangan1985; Southwood, Reference Southwood1987; Bright & Bernays, Reference Bright and Bernays1991), affecting the biological cycle and behaviour of the species (Mulkern, Reference Mulkern1967; Uvarov, Reference Uvarov1977). Very few studies use plants that resemble those of the natural scenarios from which grasshoppers come (Franzke et al., Reference Franzke, Unsicker, Specht, Köhler and Weisser2010), although bioassays provide knowledge of the use of habitat (occupation, feeding) and also on some competitive interactions (Litvaitis, Reference Litvaitis, Boitani and Fuller2000), apart from the aforementioned specific biological aspects.

Surveys on the feeding behaviour of Orthoptera also indicate that variation in the local environment is one of the most crucial factors in the establishment of specific associations between grasshoppers and vegetation (Guendouz-Benrima et al., Reference Guendouz-Benrima, Doumandji-Mitiche and Petit2011). In consequence, research on changes in the pattern of distribution of Orthopteran species in response to the application of restoration techniques should consider the trophic component together with analysis of environmental heterogeneity.

On the other hand, development of organisms in their respective habitats involves confrontation with environmental changes due to seasonal and inter-annual fluctuations of physical and biotic factors. Therefore, to survive such changes, they adjust their biology by modifying their breeding cycle, pattern of development and even their population dynamics (Karpakakunjaram et al., Reference Karpakakunjaram, Kolatkar and Muralirangan2002; Da Silva et al., Reference Da Silva, Marques, Battirola and Lhano2010; Savitsky, Reference Savitsky2010).

The adaptation of the life cycle of the species to the local environment involves developing a series of physiological and behavioural characteristics that affect multiple aspects such as fertility, growth rate, the annual number of generations, the processes of dormancy and quiescence, the duration of different stages of development, adult longevity and synchronization between the breeding period and environmental variables (Neumann, Reference Neumann, Taylor and Karban1986). Therefore, research on the reproductive biology of species is particularly important. Such studies typically include detailed monitoring of ovarian development, because females of Orthoptera, like many other insects, retain in their ovaries evidence of their ovipositional history (Sundberg et al., Reference Sundberg, Luong-Skovmand and Whitman2001; Hodin, Reference Hodin, Whitman and Ananthakrishnan2009). This legacy of past events in egg-laying takes the form of cell-rests, named corpora lutea, which are very informative for interpreting the biological cycle of species (Quesada-Moraga & Santiago-Álvarez, Reference Quesada-Moraga and Santiago-Álvarez2001).

The majority of available information on the biology of this grasshopper derives from Central Europe (Ramsay Reference Ramsay1964; Ingrisch, Reference Ingrisch1983; Ingrisch & Köler, Reference Ingrisch and Köhler1998). Regarding the Mediterranean Region, the literature on the ecology of C. vagans is quite extensive (García & Presa, Reference García and Presa1985; Llucià-Pomares, Reference Llucià-Pomares2002; Olmo-Vidal, Reference Olmo-Vidal2002). However, the biological aspects (food selection, reproduction) remain unknown at the lower latitude.

This work is aimed at investigating the biology of C. vagans through parameters including autoecology, feeding preferences and reproduction in the Southern Iberian Peninsula, in order to determine how it adjusts to the environmental features of this particular ecosystem and to interpret how it could be affected by the environmental changes. This species is one of the most common grasshoppers in the study area; potentially, it constitutes a major component of the diet of many vertebrate species (birds, wall lizards, amphibians, etc.). Studies on the biology of C. vagans are of considerable interest to understand their life history, ecology and adaptability to the environmental changes.

Materials and methods

Study area

This study was carried out in the surroundings of the Breña dam in the Hornachuelos Natural Park (SW Iberian Peninsula). This area is included in the Environmental Recovery Programme linked to the construction of this new dam (in compliance with the Directive Habitat, Council Directive 92/43/EEC), and it includes a total of twelve restoration plots (table 1).

Table 1. Nomination, code, locality and Geographic Coordinates for the sampling plots.

As a whole, the area shows a wavy relief, with altitudes ranging from 100 to 725 m and, from a lithological point of view, metamorphic rocks predominate, particularly quartzite, slates and semi-acidic intrusive rocks. Sandy or clayey substrates can also be found. The soils are chemically and physically homogeneous, mostly acids, with low levels of organic material and carbon (Pinilla, Reference Pinilla2006). The climate is of Mediterranean type, with mean temperatures of 25–26°C in summer and 8–10°C in winter, and rainfall levels ranging from 500 to 800 mm (Gallardo et al., Reference Gallardo, Cárdenas and Gaju2010).

The landscape is dominated by a Mediterranean mixed sclerophyllous forest, sited on the thermo- and meso-Mediterranean bioclimatic belts (Cárdenas & Bach, Reference Cárdenas and Bach1989).

The vegetation in the area belongs to the Duriilignosa formation, represented in the Iberian Peninsula by the Quercetea ilicis type. The sclerophyllous forests are characterized by the predominance of holm oaks (Quercus ilex L.) and cork oaks (Q. suber L.) (Cárdenas & Gallardo, Reference Cárdenas and Gallardo2012), as well as Pistacia lentiscus L., Asparagus albus L., Arbutus unedo L., and different species of Erica and Cistus in the bushes (Torres & Ruiz, Reference Torres and Ruiz2009).

Field work

The field work related to C. vagans autecology was performed between 2007 and 2010, from February to November each year, coinciding with the activity period of this grasshopper in the area (own data). During the sampling period, a monthly visit was made to each of the twelve sampling plots. At each plot, linear transects (Gardiner & Hill, Reference Gardiner and Hill2006) with zig-zag paths were performed over a sampling time of 30 min per sampling day. Direct manual capture and sweep nets were used to catch specimens. Later, they were identified, censused and released after recording sex and maturation stage (nymph or adult). Specimens that could not be identified in the field were collected, preserved in 70% ethanol, and transported to the laboratory for classification. For each individual observed, the environmental temperature and humidity at the observation time were also registered. To standardize field data, the monthly average number of individuals (males, females and nymphs) was calculated for each sampling plot.

Laboratory work related to trophic response tests

For the food selection tests, a total of ten nymphs of the last stages (IV or V) and ten adults of C. vagans were collected in the field (May 2011). Live individuals were brought to the laboratory in plastic insectaries measuring 23 × 13 × 18 cm3, perforated in the upper wall and provided with 2 cm of moistened vermiculite (1.5 ml distilled water/1 g vermiculite), a water dispenser and some shelters (leaves, branches, stones, etc.) for accommodation.

Specimens were maintained in the laboratory following a modification of the methods used by Quesada-Moraga & Santiago-Álvarez (Reference Quesada-Moraga and Santiago-Álvarez2001) and Michel & Terán (Reference Michel and Terán2006). In particular, each of the specimens of C. vagans was placed into wood insectaries of 35 × 35 × 35 cm3, with a metallic mesh on the upper and lateral walls to facilitate ventilation and observation. A daylight bulb of 60 W was placed 15 cm above the upper wall. As substrate, a 2-cm thick layer of vermiculite moistened with 1.5 ml of distilled water was used. In addition, some shelters (stones and branches) previously sterilized (at 100°C for 48 h) were added as well as a water dispenser of 20 ml and food supplied in each case (fresh plants).

The insectaries were maintained under controlled conditions (27 ± 2°C; 66 ± 7% relative humidity; photoperiod: 14 h light; 10 h dark).

Two types of food were selected to explore food preferences and to quantify the consumption rate.

Type 1: gramineous: Lolium sp.

Type 2: shrubs: Cistus monspeliensis L. for adults or C. salviifolius L. for nymphs. The difference in the type of food supplied to nymphs and adults depended on the Cistus species from which they were captured in the field.

The criteria for selecting species were as follows: Lolium the main component of the grassland in the sampling plots and diverse Cistus species (C. salviifolius and C. monspeliensis) were planted in sampling plots in order to restore the scrub.

Forced feeding tests (monospecific diet) and choice feeding tests (mixed diet) were performed. The plants were supplied ad libitum in both diets.

The method for estimating the amount of food consumed was a modification of that devised by Bardi et al. (Reference Bardi, Mariottini, De Wysiecki and Lange2011), and is described below.

To obtain the initial dry weight of each type of food, ten samples of 2 g (each) of each plant species (type 1 – Lolium sp.; type 2 – C. monspeliensis or C. salviifolius) were placed into the oven at 80°C. After 24 h, they were weighed and the average initial dry weight corresponding to 2 g of fresh weight was calculated.

In the monospecific diet test, 2 g of one food type was placed in each insectary. The plants were supplied vertically (Williams, Reference Williams1954; Kaufmann, Reference Kaufmann1965), and after 3 days the remaining food was removed. To obtain the consumption in dry weight, these vegetal rests were placed in an oven for 24 h at 80°C, and then they were weighed again. Once the test of type 1 food was completed, the same procedure was followed with type 2 food (2 g of C. monspeliensis or C. salviifolius).

For the mixed diet test, 2 g of each type of food (Lolium and Cistus) were simultaneously supplied and the same protocol as that described above was followed. A total of ten replicates were made for each type of food experiment.

The weight data were obtained with a CB-Junior 0.01 g precision balance.

For the statistical comparison of data on the mean consumption of each type of food supplied in treatments of forced feeding and choice feeding, the statistical Student's t test was applied, provided that the data met the assumptions of normality. Otherwise, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was applied. The assumptions of normality were previously verified by the Shapiro–Wilk test. All statistical tests were conducted with α = 0.05. Calculations were performed with SP statistical software (SPSS Inc., 2011).

Laboratory work related to reproductive biology tests

To study the reproductive biology of C. vagans different procedures were used as described below.

Anatomical observations

From February to November 2012, a total of 29 females was captured and preserved in 70% ethanol for at least 7 days to fix internal structures. The females were anatomically inspected, and were dissected according to the protocol described by Elamin et al. (Reference Elamin, Abdalla and El Naim2014) to determine their age and reproductive stage. Age was determined by testing the softness of the integument and the wear extent of structures such as bristles, tibial spines and tarsal claws (Van Huizen, Reference Van Huizen1980; Cárdenas & Bach, Reference Cárdenas and Bach1992) and, particularly, the mandibles (Köhler et al., Reference Köhler, Jentzsch and Reinhardt2000). The females were classified as follows:

Immature or newly emerged females

Showing no wear in the integumentary structures or in the molar and incisor regions of the mandible. Mostly, they had no differentiated ovaries or they were in the early stages of differentiation.

Mature

Females showing oocytes in different stages of differentiation and with incipient wear of the external anatomical structures.

Gravid

Females containing mature eggs and egg-pods in development; bristles, spines and mandibles with moderate wear.

Old

Females with regressed ovaria, corpora lutea and worn integumentary structures.

Old females starting reproduction

Females showing developed ovaries with differentiated oocytes and with corpora lutea. Integumentary structures very worn.

In addition, in line with Uvarov (Reference Uvarov1966) and Elamin et al. (Reference Elamin, Abdalla and El Naim2014), potential fecundity was defined as the average number of eggs per fertile female dissected. A female was considered fertile if she had at least one mature egg in the ovaria.

Laboratory test

Laboratory tests were performed with 15 pairs of adults of C. vagans. They were captured in April and the rearing experiments were conducted until October 2012. The specimens were kept in the same conditions described above for the trophic preferences test. In addition, to provide a suitable substrate for oviposition, a cylindrical plastic container measuring 10 cm Ø and 6 cm in height with a substrate of sand and soil (50:50) was placed into the insectary. The soil originated from the same place as the specimens and had previously been sieved (0.55 mm mesh) and sterilized (100°C/48 h). The containers were examined twice a week and the egg-pods were removed and measured (width and length). Later, the egg-pods were opened to quantify the total number of eggs.

Results

Autecology of C. vagans

A total of 1217 specimens (502 ♂♂, 459 ♀♀ and 256 nymphs) of C. vagans was recorded during the sampling period. Field data indicate that, in the study area, C. vagans is a fairly abundant and widely distributed species, except for in plot 1 (Mesas Bajas) (fig. 1) where the species was not recorded. The most suitable sampling places for C. vagans species were plots 9 (Raso del Conejo) and 5 (Los Baldíos), with average values of abundance higher than 100 specimens/year each. In addition, noticeable abundance levels were obtained in plots 11 (Mezquitillas), 4 (Llanos de la Iglesia) and 3 (Cerro del Trigo), where we recorded 57, 37 and 50 individuals/year, respectively (figs. 2a and b). The species were scarcer in the remaining sampling plots.

Fig. 1. Location of sampling plots in the research area. The plots with presence of C. vagans are marked in grey.

Fig. 2. (a) Abundance (total number of specimens) of males, females and nymphs of C. vagans recorded in each sampling plot during the sampling period 2007–2010. (b) Average number (and standard deviation, SD) of males, females and nymphs of C. vagans/year in each sampling plot during de sampling period 2007–2010.

The species was mostly located in different maturation stages of grasslands and medium-sized scrubs composed predominantly of Cistaceae (C. salviifolius and C. monspeliensis). Some individuals were also observed in transitional zones, open areas with scarce herbaceous or shrub vegetation or in litter substrate of cork and holm oaks.

This species showed a wide phenological pattern (fig. 3), displaying activity throughout the year excluding the winter time, regardless of which developmental post-embryonic stage was considered. The first to appear were the nymphs (April) which reach their maximum abundance in early summer and disappear towards mid-August. The adult population had a lag of approximately 1 month compared with the immature insects (May), peaking towards the end of summer. Their activity gradually decreases in the following weeks until late November, when adults were completely absent.

Fig. 3. Field activity-pattern of nymphs and adults of C. vagans.

On the other hand, males and females were quite synchronized in their activity periods and had a balanced population size, with a sex ratio close to 1 (52.6% ♂♂:47.4% ♀♀).

Trophic response tests

The statistical comparisons of data on the mean consumption (table 2) indicate a noticeable preference of adults for the herbaceous plants when a mixed diet is supplied. The average amount of Lolium consumed was significantly higher than that of Cistus. However, nymphs and adults subjected to a monospecific diet showed no significant differences between the average consumption of the two types of food offered. In the case of nymphs, the statistical comparison did not find significant differences in consumption in any of the treatments considered.

Table 2. Results of the comparison test of average consumption of C. vagans.

S–W, normality test Shapiro–Wilk; P, statistical significance for α ≥ 0.05; Z, statistical significance Mann–Whitney U test; T, statistical significance T-Student's test; N, number of samples of each type of food; ${\bar{\rm X}}$ , average consumption (g); SD, standard deviation.

Reproductive biology

Anatomical observations related to the ovarian development of the 29 females collected in 2012, throughout the adult activity period, enabled us to establish the course of their reproductive stage (fig. 4). Each of the females dissected was assigned to their respective maturation stages (immature, mature, gravid, old and old females starting reproduction).

Fig. 4. Temporal course of reproductive stage of females (olds, gravids, matures and inmatures) of C. vagans.

The start of ovarian development coincides with the beginning of the adults’ activity. First, females with completely developed eggs (mature) and gravid females appeared in April, although some immature specimens were observed at this time and were present until June. In early summer, the female population included both females at different stages of maturity and those which have already oviposited and that showed clear signs of senescence (wearing in the anatomical structures). The egg-laying activity continued in summer and ended in September.

To estimate the reproductive potential of C. vagans, the monthly average number of mature eggs by dissected females was analysed (fig. 5). According to the results, the egg-laying period ranges from April to August, the average number of mature eggs/♀ oscillates between 5 and 11, and the average size of mature eggs is 1 ± 0.1 mm Ø and 4 ± 0.3 mm in length.

Fig. 5. Temporal course of the average number (and standard deviation, SD) of eggs/fertile females of C. vagans.

The reproductive biology was monitored in the laboratory (fig. 6). The first pods occurred at the end of May and continued to the end of August, reaching the maximum in July, when the species was at its reproductive optimum (fertility of 1.33 egg-pods/♀). The total number of egg-pods collected during the experiment was 34 and the ratio of egg-pods/♀ was 2.26.

Fig. 6. Temporal course of the relation number of egg-pods/number of females of C. vagans.

In addition, the results provide the following information:

  1. 1. The egg-pods were buried between 2 and 5 cm deep.

  2. 2. The average size of egg-pods was 4 ± 0.9 mm Ø and 9.8 ± 1.7 mm in length.

  3. 3. The average number of eggs per egg-pod was 7 ± 1.6; the average size of viable eggs was 1 ± 0.1 mm Ø and 4 ± 0.2 mm in length.

Discussion

Autecology of C. vagans

According to our results, C. vagans is a ubiquitous and abundant grasshopper in the studied area, which is consistent with previous data relative to the Iberian Peninsula (Presa et al., Reference Presa, Montes and Ramírez-Díaz1983; Llucià-Pomares, Reference Llucià-Pomares2002; Olmo-Vidal, Reference Olmo-Vidal2002) reporting that the species can colonize a great diversity of biotopes including sand grassland, steppe habitats, heathland, pasture and scrubs and their transitional ecotones (Hochkirch et al., Reference Hochkirch, Gärtner and Brandt2008). Research performed in Central Europe indicates that C. vagans colonizes any type of vegetation (woody plants, herbs, grasses, etc.) avoiding bare soil and areas with a large fraction of gravel (Wunder, Reference Wunder2001; Kurth, Reference Kurth2007). Data referred to the Iberian Peninsula also link this species to a great variety of environmental types, including beaches, dunes, pine and oak forests, grassland and bush (Llucià-Pomares, Reference Llucià-Pomares2002; Olmo-Vidal, Reference Olmo-Vidal2002).

Nevertheless, C. vagans was not observed in the sampling plot P1 (Mesas Bajas). The study site P1 was an extremely uniform wasteland due to intensive farming and grazing, which led to a complete removal of forest vegetation and hampered any spontaneous regeneration of the understory (Gallardo, Reference Gallardo2011). These circumstances restrict the presence of insect species that prefer to colonize grass and shrubs (Braschler et al., Reference Braschler, Marini, Thommen and Baur2009). Similar results were also observed by Kurth (Reference Kurth2007) in the Southern Alps. Intensive grazing on natural ecosystems affects even species, which are able to colonize open environments and bare soils, like C. vagans, because of the reduction of the amount of food available, the micro-climate change and the disruption and disturbance of spawning areas (O'Neill et al., Reference O'Neill, Olson, Rolston, Wallander, Larson and Seibert2003). In sampling plots with higher environmental heterogeneity and hunting exploitation (e.g., P9 and P11), the populations of C. vagans were noticeably more numerous. This result confirms the importance of maintaining a mosaic of habitats for the conservation of Orthoptera (Schirmel et al., Reference Schirmel, Blindow and Fartmann2010). By contrast, the most homogeneous and extensive environments are not suitable for the proliferation of these insects, which prefer more ecologically diverse environments (Tscharntke et al., Reference Tscharntke, Steffan-Dewenter, Kruess and Thies2002; Tews et al., Reference Tews, Brose, Grimm, Tielböger, Wichmann, Schwager and Jeltsch2004).

Regarding microhabitat, our observations suggest that C. vagans occurs in xeric grasslands and dry ecotones and transitional zones, which is consistent with results reported by Hochkirch et al. (Reference Hochkirch, Gärtner and Brandt2008) and Llucià-Pomares et al. (Reference Llucià-Pomares, Íñiguez and Quiñones2009), respectively.

Phenologically, the species displays a broad period of activity, as described by most research on Mediterranean ecosystems (García, Reference García1984; García & Presa, Reference García and Presa1985; Olmo-Vidal, Reference Olmo-Vidal2002; Voisin, Reference Voisin2003). A few authors have attributed a more restricted activity period to C. vagans (Gómez & Presa, Reference Gómez and Presa1990; Gómez et al., Reference Gómez, Presa and García1992; Pardo & Gómez, Reference Pardo and Gómez1995; Hernández et al., Reference Hernández, Clemente, García and Presa1998; Llucià-Pomares & Fernández-Ortín, Reference Llucià-Pomares and Fernández-Ortín2009). To explain this it must be taken into account that the life cycle of Orthoptera is also influenced by environmental factors including climatic variables, relief, soil substrate, vegetation and food availability that largely determine activity in both nymphal and imaginal phenology of species, as well as other parameters (population density, birth and death rates, nymphal development, etc.; Carter et al., Reference Carter, Macrae, Logan and Holtzer1998) that induce local variations in the full phenology of the species. In fact, in samplings performed to study trophic response and reproductive biology (2011 and 2012, respectively) the first adults were already recorded in April, which extends its activity period. According to our data, C. vagans could be considered a eurytopic species that is capable of activity in wide ranges of temperature and environmental humidity.

The immature population shows a clear trend of concentrating activity in the spring–summer transition, when climatic conditions seem to be more suitable for development (Badih et al., Reference Badih, Hidalgo, Ballesta, Ruano and Tinaut1997). This result is consistent with those of Kleukers et al. (Reference Kleukers, Van Nieukerken, Odé, Willemse and Van Wingerden1997) for C. vagans, and is commonly observed for Orthopteran communities from the Mediterranean Basin (Cebada & Novoa, Reference Cebada and Novoa1985; Aguirre & Pascual, Reference Aguirre and Pascual1988; Voisin, Reference Voisin2003; Massa et al., Reference Massa, Fontana, Buzzetti, Kleukers and Odé2013).

Adults are abundant during the summer. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that the decrease in adult activity observed in August could be explained by the extreme environmental conditions (dryness and temperature) of this month, which forces the insects to seek shelter in the vegetation, making observation and sampling difficult. In fact, this decrease has not been observed at the highest latitudes and with more consistent climates (Steiner, Reference Steiner2006; Jaulin & Baillet, Reference Jaulin and Baillet2007; Kurth, Reference Kurth2007).

Overall, C. vagans is an univoltine species in the research area, in accordance with Hochkirch et al. (Reference Hochkirch, Gärtner and Brandt2008), with the presence of nymphs in spring and adults mostly in summer. The activity of adults extends to late autumn and overwintering occurs during the embryonic stage (Ingrisch, Reference Ingrisch1983; Beckmann et al., Reference Beckmann, Purse, Roy, Roy, Sutton and Thomas2015), as in other Chorthippus species (Wingerden et al., Reference Wingerden, Musters and Maaskamp1991). Nevertheless, our data also suggest that some adults may survive the winter, reappearing in the following spring based on the observance of some reproductively mature females in April. Most grasshoppers from temperate and sub-tropical regions usually overwinter as diapausing eggs (Tanaka & Zhu, Reference Tanaka and Zhu2008), while some species may overwinter as diapausing adults (Tanaka & Okuda, Reference Tanaka and Okuda1996). Each diapause phase may be influenced by environmental factors as well as by insect genetics (Tauber et al., Reference Tauber, Tauber, Obrycki, Gollands and Wright1988; Han & Denlinger, Reference Han and Denlinger2009). Zhu et al. (Reference Zhu, Cui, Fan and Liu2013) suggest that the females of some grasshopper species (Stenocatantops splendens Thunberg; Orthoptera, Catantopidae) are colder hardy than their male counterparts, which may result from a trade-off between investments in cold tolerance and reproduction. This is consistent with our observation of reproductive females already in the middle of spring.

Trophic response

The fact that, of the four treatments tested, only significant differences were found between the consumption of grass and Cistus in the mixed diet for adults indicates that this species is polyphagous organism in the Mediterranean ecosystem with some preference for grass in the case of adults. This result is in consistent with the statements of Treiber (Reference Treiber2001) and Steiner (Reference Steiner2006), which considers C. vagas mainly graminivorous, being also able to consume other plant species such as Ulex or Astragalus.

The mandibular typology of this species is consistent with those of a grass-feeding type and also coincides with the information in the literature related to the mouthparts of Gomphocerinae (Joern & Lawlor, Reference Joern and Lawlor1980; Isern, Reference Isern1992; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Zhao and Kang2003; Smith & Capinera, Reference Smith and Capinera2005; Savitsky, Reference Savitsky2010). Nonetheless, in a more recent survey other non-gramineous but Fabaceae plants such as the dwarf gorse (Ulex minor Roth.) are considered a main food support for this species (Edwards, Reference Edwards2011). The euryphagy of C. vagans mentioned in the literature and obtained in our data could be explained by a behavioural plasticity or ecological opportunism common in Orthoptera (Smith & Capinera, Reference Smith and Capinera2005) with a genetic background (Steiner, Reference Steiner2006).

More specifically, and with reference to the Iberian fauna, there is evidence of a graminivorous diet for other Chorthippus species including C. dorsatus (Zetterstedt, 1821), C. binotatus (Charpentier, 1825), C. apricarius (Linnaeus, 1758), C. biguttulus (Linnaeus, 1758), C. albomarginatus (De Geer, 1773) and C. parallelus (Zetterstedt, 1821) (Vieira, Reference Vieira1989; Gangwere, Reference Gangwere1990; Isern, Reference Isern1992). In accordance with our results, these Gomphocerinae species may also feed on shrub plants as a food supplement when the availability of grass is restricted (Picaud et al., Reference Picaud, Bonnet, Gloaguen and Petit2003).

Reproductive biology

The information obtained from our laboratory tests about the reproductive life cycle of C. vagans confirms that this is a univoltine species, which is also consistent with the data of Rauh (Reference Rauh, Schlumprecht and Waeber2003); Jaulin & Baillet (Reference Jaulin and Baillet2007) and Hochkirch et al. (Reference Hochkirch, Gärtner and Brandt2008). Ovarian development of C. vagans begins in the spring, coinciding with the activity of the adults. The appearance of the first gravid females in April is consistent with the results obtained in the laboratory dating the first egg-pods in May. In summer, the sample of females is composed of individuals in different stages of ovarian maturation, together with a small fraction of females that have already reproduced, as revealed by the presence of corpora lutea and also the clear signs of senescence (wearing integumentary structures).

Anatomical studies also reveal that the females of this species may have an extended period of egg-pod development (April–August), based on the presence of egg-pods between late May and August in the laboratory; the optimal period was in July with 1.33 egg-pods/♀. This result is not conclusive because research indicates that the number of egg-pods for specimens of the same species can vary depending on the environmental conditions (natural or experimental; Köhler & Brodhun, Reference Köhler and Brodhun1987; Kriegbaum, Reference Kriegbaum1997), usually increasing under controlled laboratory conditions (Uvarov, Reference Uvarov1966).

In the laboratory, egg-pods were found between 2 and 5 cm in depth. Treiber (Reference Treiber and Detzel1998) indicates that C. vagans oviposit more superficially (0.5–1.5 cm). However, it has been also observed that other Chorthippus species, such as C. brunneus, usually lay their eggs up to 6 cm deep (Atkinson & Begon, Reference Atkinson and Begon1987; Treiber, Reference Treiber and Detzel1998), which is more consistent with our results.

Furthermore, the average number of eggs/female on anatomical dissections ranged between 5 and 11, and is consistent with the laboratory results (7 ± 1.6 egg number/egg-pod) and with data provided by Waloff (Reference Waloff1950) and Richards & Waloff (Reference Richards and Waloff1954) (6 ± 0.2), also for C. vagans. This result is also consistent with observations of other species of Chorthippus (9.5 eggs for C. parallelus and 9.26 for C. biguttulus (Kriegbaum, Reference Kriegbaum1997); 8–14 eggs for C. brunneus (Atkinson & Begon, Reference Atkinson and Begon1987; Wall & Begon, Reference Wall and Begon1987)).

There is fairly comprehensive knowledge of the number of nymphal instars in studies on C. vagans performed in Central Europe: four for males and four to five for females (Richards & Waloff, Reference Richards and Waloff1954; Ramsay, Reference Ramsay1964; Ingrisch & Köhler, Reference Ingrisch and Köhler1998).

Finally, it should be mentioned that there are multiple issues requiring consideration in future research relative to the life traits of this species in the Mediterranean ecosystems, such as the number and duration of nymphal stages, because it has been demonstrated that environmental variations affect the life cycle of Chorthippus species (Telfer & Hassall, Reference Telfer and Hassall1999).

Other issues to be considered in the future are mating frequency, which can influence the oviposition rate (Arnqvist & Nilsson, Reference Arnqvist and Nilsson2000) and reproductive potential (Bellinger & Pienkowski, Reference Bellinger and Pienkowski1985; Taylor & Whitman, Reference Taylor and Whitman2010). When these questions are clarified, a more accurate understanding of the adaptation of C. vagans to the Mediterranean ecosystems will be possible. This information would be very valuable to perform an accurate environmental management in order to prevent the regression of this species that has occurred in more septentrional areas of Europe.

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleague Mr. Juan M. Hidalgo for the assistance in field. This research has been financially supported by ACUAES (Aguas de la Cuenca de España, S.A., Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Government of Spain) and by Ingeniería y Gestión del Sur, S.L. (Grupo IG-IPA).

References

Aguirre, A. & Pascual, F. (1988) Ortópteros del Sureste almeriense. II. Fenología. Actas II Congreso Ibérico de Entomología, pp. 431440. Sevilla.Google Scholar
Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60, 145164.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. & Begon, M. (1987) Reproductive variation and adult size in two co-occurring grasshopper species. Ecological Entomology 12, 119127.Google Scholar
Badih, A., Hidalgo, J., Ballesta, M., Ruano, F. & Tinaut, A. (1997) Distribution and phenology of a community of Orthoptera (Insecta) in a dune ecosystem of the southeastern Iberian Peninsula. Zoologica baetica 8, 3142.Google Scholar
Bakker, W., Bouwman, J., Brekelmans, F., Colijn, E., Felix, R., Grutters, M., Kerkhof, W. & Kleukers, R. (2015) De Nederlandse sprinkhanen en krekels (Orthoptera). EIS Leiden, Series: Entomologische Tabellen 8.Google Scholar
Bardi, C., Mariottini, Y., De Wysiecki, M.L. & Lange, C.E. (2011) Desarrollo post-embrionario, fecundidad y consumo de alimento de Dichroplus exilis (Orthoptera: Acrididae) bajo condiciones controladas. Revista de Biología Tropical 59(4), 15791587.Google Scholar
Beckmann, B.C., Purse, B.V., Roy, D.B., Roy, H.E., Sutton, P.G. & Thomas, C.D. (2015) Two species with an unusual combination of traits dominate responses of British grasshoppers and crickets to environmental change. PLoS ONE 10(6), 125.Google Scholar
Bellinger, R.G. & Pienkowski, R.L. (1985) Interspecific variation in ovariole number in Melanopline Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78(1), 127130.Google Scholar
Berg, H.M., Bieringer, G. & Zechner, L. (2005) Rote Liste der Heuschrecken (Orthoptera) Österreichs. pp. 167209 in Zulka, K.P. (Ed) Rote Listen gefahrdeter Tiere Osterreichs. Checklisten, Gefahrdungsanalysen, Handlungsbedarf. Teil 1. Grijne Reihe des Lebensministeriums, Bd. 1411, Wien.Google Scholar
Braschler, B., Marini, L., Thommen, G.H. & Baur, B. (2009) Effects of small-scale grassland fragmentation and frequent mowing on population density and species diversity of Orthopterans: a long-term study. Ecological Entomology 34, 321329.Google Scholar
Bright, K.L. & Bernays, E.A. (1991) Distinctive flavors influence mixing of nutritionally identical foods by grasshoppers. Chemical Senses 16(4), 329336.Google Scholar
Cabrero, J. & Camacho, J.P.M. (1987) Population cytogenetics of Chorthippus vagans. I. Polymorphisms for pericentric inversion and for heterochromatin deletion. Genome 29(2), 280284.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, A.M. & Bach, C. (1989) The effect of some abiotic factors on the distribution and selection of habitat by the Carabid Beetles in the Central Sierra Morena Mountains (SW Córdoba. Spain). Vie et Milieu 39(2), 93103.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, A.M. & Bach, C. (1992) Primeros datos sobre la biología de reproducción y desarrollo larvario de Macrothorax rugosus Fabricius, 1792 (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Zoologica baetica 3, 139146.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, A.M. & Gallardo, P. (2012) The effect of temperature on the preimaginal development of the Jewel beetle Coraebus florentinus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). European Journal of Entomology 109, 2128.Google Scholar
Carter, M.R., Macrae, I.V., Logan, J.A. & Holtzer, T.O. (1998) Population model for Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and an analysis of grasshopper population fluctuations in Colorado. Population Ecology 27(4), 892901.Google Scholar
Cebada, E. & Novoa, F. (1985) Los Ortópteros del Valle de Ulla. II. Estudio de las poblaciones en relación con la vegetación. Boletín de la Asociación española de Entomología 9, 514.Google Scholar
Cerro, A.L. & Santos, J.L. (1995) Synapsis in grasshopper bivalents heterozygous for centric shifts. Genome 38(3), 616622.Google Scholar
Chen, H.H., Zhao, Y.X. & Kang, L. (2003) Antennal sensilla of grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in relation to food preferences and habits. Journal of Biosciences 28(6), 743752.Google Scholar
Da Silva, F.R.J., Marques, M.I., Battirola, L.D. & Lhano, M.G. (2010) Fenologia de Cornops aquaticum (Bruner) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) em Eichhornia azurea (Pontederiaceae) no Norte do Pantanal de Mato Grosso. Neotropical Entomology 39(4), 535542.Google Scholar
Edwards, B. (2011) The Grasshoppers, Bush-crickets and Allies of Dorset. Dorset, UK, Dorset Environmental Records Centre.Google Scholar
Elamin, A.E.H., Abdalla, A.M. & El Naim, A.M. (2014) The Biology of Senegalense Grasshopper (Oedalus senegalensis, 1877) (Orthoptera: Acrididae). International Journal of Advances in Life Science and Technology 1(1), 645.Google Scholar
Franzke, A., Unsicker, S.B., Specht, J., Köhler, G. & Weisser, W.W. (2010) Being a generalist herbivore in a diverse world: how do diets from different grassland influence food plant selection and fitness of the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus? Ecological Entomology 35, 126138.Google Scholar
Gallardo, P. (2011) Incidencia de Coleópteros perforadores en formaciones de Quercíneas del suroeste peninsular: evaluación de daños y propuestas para la conservación. Dissertation, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.Google Scholar
Gallardo, P., Cárdenas, A.M. & Gaju, M. (2010) Occurrence of Reticulitermes grassei (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on cork oaks in the southern Iberian Peninsula: identification, description and incidence of the damage. Sociobiology 56, 675687.Google Scholar
Gangwere, S.K. (1990) Food selection in the Acridoidea, or grasshoppers, of the Sierra de Cazorla (Spain). Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal: Plagas 20, 287290.Google Scholar
García, M.D. (1984) Estudio faunístico y ecológico de los Acridoidea (Orth. Insecta) de Sierra Espuña (Murcia). Murcia, Spain, Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
García, M.D. & Presa, J.J. (1985) Estudio faunístico y taxonómico de los Caelifera (Orthoptera: Insecta) de Sierra Espuña (Murcia, SE de España). Anales de Biología 3 (Biología Animal, 1), 5579.Google Scholar
Gardiner, T. & Hill, J. (2006) A comparison of three sampling techniques used to estimate the population density and assemblage diversity of Orthoptera. Journal of Orthoptera Research 15(1), 4551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, R. & Presa, J.J. (1990) Evolución anual de una comunidad de Ortópteros en un Tobaral (Onopordum nervosum) de la provincia de Albacete. Al-Basit- Revista de Estudios Albacetenses 27, 6585.Google Scholar
Gómez, R., Presa, J.J. & García, M.D. (1992) Estudio faunístico y ecológico de los Caelifera (Orthoptera: Insecta) de la sierra de Taibilla (Albacete). Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, Colección Ciencia y Técnica, Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Google Scholar
Guendouz-Benrima, A., Doumandji-Mitiche, B. & Petit, D. (2011) Effects of weak climatic variation on assemblages and life cycles of Orthoptera in North Algeria. Journal of Arid Environments 75, 416423.Google Scholar
Han, B. & Denlinger, D.L. (2009) Mendelian inheritance of pupal diapause in the flesh fly, Sarcophaga bullata . Journal of Heredity 100, 251255.Google Scholar
Hernández, A., Clemente, M.E., García, M.D. & Presa, J.J. (1998) Inventario y dinámica poblacional de los ortopteroides (Orthoptera, Blattoptera, Mantodea y Phasmoptera) del parque natural del “Carrascal de la Font Roja” (Alicante, E. España). Zoologica Baetica 9, 185204.Google Scholar
Hochkirch, A., Gärtner, A.C. & Brandt, T. (2008) Effects of forest-dune ecotone management on the endangered heath grasshopper, Chorthippus vagans (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 98, 449456.Google Scholar
Hodin, J. (2009) She shapes events as they come: plasticity in female insects reproduction. pp. 423521 in Whitman, D.W. & Ananthakrishnan, T.N. (Eds) Phenotypic Plasticity of Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences. USA, Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Ingrisch, S. (1983) Zum Einfluß der Feuchte auf die Schlupfrate und Entwicklungsdauer der Eier mitteleuropäischer Feldheuschrecken (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 30, 115.Google Scholar
Ingrisch, S. & Köhler, G. (1998) Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas. Magdeburg, Westarp Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Isern, J. (1992) Ecología de los Ortópteros en pastos del Pirineo Occidental . Dissertation, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Jaulin, S. & Baillet, Y. (2007) Identification et suivi des peuplements de Lépidoptères et d'Orthoptères sur l'ENS du Col du Coq – Pravouta. Perpignan, Rapport d’étude de l'OPIE-LR.Google Scholar
Joern, A. & Lawlor, L.R. (1980) Food and microhabitat utilization by grasshoppers from arid grasslands: comparisons with neutral models. Ecology 61(3), 591599.Google Scholar
Joern, A. & Lawlor, L.R. (1981) Guild structure in grasshopper assemblages based on food and microhabitat resources. Oikos 37(1), 93104.Google Scholar
Karpakakunjaram, M., Kolatkar, M.D. & Muralirangan, M.C. (2002) Effects of abiotic factors on the population of acridid grasshopper, Diabolocatantops pinguis (Orthoptera: Acrididae) at two sites in southern India: a three-year study. Journal of Orthoptera Research 11, 5562.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, T. (1965) Biological studies on some Bavarian Acridoidea (Orthoptera), with special reference to their feeding habits. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 58(6), 791801.Google Scholar
Kleukers, R.M.J.C., Van Nieukerken, E.J., Odé, B., Willemse, L.P.M. & Van Wingerden, W.K.R.E. (1997) De sprinkhanen en krekels van Nederland (Orthoptera). Nederlandse Fauna 1. Leiden, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, KNNV-Uitgeverij & EIS-Nederland.Google Scholar
Köhler, G. & Brodhun, H.P. (1987) Untersuchungen zur Populationsdynamik zentraleuropäischer Feldheuschrecken (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Zoologische Jahrbücher 114, 157191.Google Scholar
Köhler, G., Jentzsch, A. & Reinhardt, K. (2000) Age-related mandible abrasion in three species of short-horned grasshoppers (Caelifera, Acrididae). Journal of Orthoptera Research 9, 8187.Google Scholar
Kriegbaum, H. (1997) Grasshopper reproductive strategies measured in the field: a tradeoff between age at maturity and egg production per day. Naturwissenschaften 84, 157159.Google Scholar
Kurth, S. (2007) Planning a migration corridor for the highly endangered grasshopper Chorthippus pullus (Orthoptera, Acrididae) in the Rottensand (Pfynwald, VS): biodiversity aspects. Dissertation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Litvaitis, J.A. (2000) Investigating food habits of terrestrial vertebrates. pp. 165190 in Boitani, L. & Fuller, T.K. (Eds) Research Techniques in Animal Ecology. Controversies and Consequences. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Llucià-Pomares, D. (2002) Revisión de los Ortópteros (Insecta: Orthoptera) de Cataluña (España). Zaragoza, Monografías SEA, Volume 7.Google Scholar
Llucià-Pomares, D. & Fernández-Ortín, D. (2009) Estudio faunístico y ecológico preliminar de los Ortópteros (Orthoptera) del Parque Nacional de Monfragüe y zona periférica de protección (Cáceres, España). Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 44, 247294.Google Scholar
Llucià-Pomares, D., Íñiguez, J. & Quiñones, J. (2009) Primera contribución al conocimiento de la ortopterofauna (Insecta: Orthoptera) del Parque Natural de la Sierra de las Nieves (Málaga, Sur de la Península Ibérica). Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 45, 163172.Google Scholar
Lock, K., Adriaens, T., Devreise, H., San Martin, G. & Decleer, K. (2011) Updated Red Lists of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) in Flanders, Brussels and Wallonia. Bulletin S.R.B.E/K.B.V.E, 147, 211245.Google Scholar
Maas, H., Detzel, P. & Staudt, A. (2011) Rote Liste und Gesamtartenliste der Heuschrecken (Saltatoria) Deutschlands. 2. Fassung, Stand Ende 2007. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 70(3), 537606.Google Scholar
Massa, B., Fontana, P., Buzzetti, F.M., Kleukers, R. & Odé, B. (2013) Fauna d'Italia, 48. Orthoptera. Italia, Ed. Calderini.Google Scholar
Michel, A.A. & Terán, H.R. (2006) Cría en cautiverio de Baeacris punctulatus (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Melanoplinae). Acta Zoológica Lilloana 50(1–2), 131134.Google Scholar
Mulkern, G.B. (1967) Food selection by grasshoppers. Annual Review of Entomology 12, 5978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muralirangan, M.C. & Muralirangan, M. (1985) Physico-chemical factors in the acridid feeding behaviour (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Animal Sciences) 94(3), 283294.Google Scholar
Neumann, D. (1986) Life cycle strategies of an intertidal midge between subtropic and arctic latitudes. pp. 319 in Taylor, F. & Karban, R. (Eds) The Evolution of Insects Life Cycles. New York, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Olmo-Vidal, J.M. (2002) Atlas de los Ortópteros de Cataluña. Barcelona, Departament de Mediambient, Generalitat de Catalunya.Google Scholar
O'Neill, K.M., Olson, B.E., Rolston, M.G., Wallander, R., Larson, D.P. & Seibert, C.E. (2003) Effects of livestock grazing on rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) abundance. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 97, 5164.Google Scholar
Otte, D. & Joern, A. (1977) On feeding patterns in desert grasshoppers and the evolution of specialized diets. Transactions Philadelphia Academy Science 128, 89126.Google Scholar
Pardo, J.E. & Gómez, R. (1995) Orthopteroidea de los sistemas montañosos de Castilla-La Mancha (España). III. Caelifera. Anales de Biología 20 (Biología Animal, 9), 746.Google Scholar
Picaud, F., Bonnet, E., Gloaguen, V. & Petit, D. (2003) Decision making for food choice by grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae): comparison between a specialist species on a shrubby legume and three Graminivorous species. Environmental Entomology 32(3), 680688.Google Scholar
Pinilla, R. (2006) Plan de Ordenación de Recursos Naturales. Plan Rector de Uso y Gestión. Parque Natural de la Sierra de Hornachuelos. Sevilla, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía.Google Scholar
Presa, J.J., Montes, C. & Ramírez-Díaz, L. (1983) Tipificación de poblaciones de saltamontes (Orth. Acrididae) en relación con la altitud, pisos y tipos de vegetación en la Sierra de Guadarrama (Sistema Central, España). Boletín de la Asociación española de Entomología 6(2), 249265.Google Scholar
Proess, R. & Meyer, M. (2003) Rote Liste der Heuschrecken Luxemburgs. Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes Luxembourgeois 104, 5766.Google Scholar
Quesada-Moraga, E. & Santiago-Álvarez, C. (2001) Assessment of sexual maturation in the Moroccan locust Dociostaurus maroccanus (Thunberg). Journal of Orthoptera Research 10(1), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, G.W. (1964) Moult number in Orthoptera. New Zealand Journal of Science 7, 644666.Google Scholar
Rauh, M. (2003) Steppengrashüpfer. pp. 282284 in Schlumprecht, H. & Waeber, G. (Eds) Die Heuschrecken in Bayern. Stuttgart, Ulmer Verlag.Google Scholar
Richards, O.W. & Waloff, N. (1954) Studies on the biology and population dynamics of British grasshoppers. Anti-Locust Bulletin 17, 1182.Google Scholar
Savitsky, V.Y. (2010) Trophic relationships and their importance for biotic distribution of grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acridoidea) in semi-deserts and deserts of the lower Volga River area. Entomological Review 30(7), 830856.Google Scholar
Schirmel, J., Blindow, I. & Fartmann, T. (2010) The importance of habitat mosaics for Orthoptera (Caelifera and Ensifera) in dry heathlands. European Journal of Entomology 107, 129132.Google Scholar
Sheldon, J.K. & Rogers, L.E. (1978) Grasshopper food habitats within a shrub-steppe community. Oecologia 32(1), 8592.Google Scholar
Smith, T.R. & Capinera, J.L. (2005) Mandibular morphology of some Floridian grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Florida Entomologist 88(2), 204207.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. (1987) Plant variety and its interactions with herbivorous insects in Proceeding of the 6th International Symposium of Insects-plants Relationships, Pau, France.Google Scholar
SPSS Inc. (2011) SPSS 20.0 for Windows Use Manual (version 20.0). New York, USA.Google Scholar
Steiner, A. (2006) Contributions to the nutritional ecology of the endangered grasshopper Chorthippus pullus (Philippi 1830) (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Dissertation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Sundberg, S.V., Luong-Skovmand, M.H. & Whitman, D.W. (2001) Morphology and development of oocyte and follicle resorption bodies in the Lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). Journal of Orthoptera Research 10(1), 3951.Google Scholar
Sutton, P.G. (2015) A review of the Orthoptera (Grasshoppers and Crickets) and allied species of Great Britain Orthoptera, Dictyoptera, Dermaptera, Phasmida Species Status, 21. Natural England Commissioned Report NECR187.Google Scholar
Tanaka, S. & Okuda, T. (1996) Effect of photoperiod on sexual maturation, fat content and respiration rate in adult Locusta migratoria . Japanese Journal of Entomology 64, 420428.Google Scholar
Tanaka, S. & Zhu, D.H. (2008) Geographic variation in embryonic diapause, cold-hardiness and life cycles in the migratory locust Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in China. Entomological Science 11, 327339.Google Scholar
Tauber, M.J., Tauber, C.A., Obrycki, J.J., Gollands, B. & Wright, R.J. (1988) Geographical variation in response to photoperiod and temperature by Leptinotarsa decemlineata during and after dormancy. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 81, 764773.Google Scholar
Taylor, B.J. & Whitman, D.W. (2010) A test of three hypotheses for ovariole number determination in the grasshopper Romalea microptera . Physiological Entomology 35, 214221.Google Scholar
Telfer, M.G. & Hassall, M. (1999) Ecotypic differentiation in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus: life history varies in relation to climate. Oecologia 121, 245254.Google Scholar
Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielböger, K., Wichmann, M.C., Schwager, M. & Jeltsch, F. (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography 31, 7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, J.A. & Ruiz, J.M. (2009) La Sierra de Hornachuelos. Almuzara, Colección Naturaleza y Medio Ambiente.Google Scholar
Treiber, R. (1998) Chorthippus vagans . pp. 479486 in Detzel, P. (Ed) Die Heuschrecken Baden-Württembergs. Stuttgart, Ulmer Verlag.Google Scholar
Treiber, R. (2001) Freilandbeobachtungen zur Nahrungsaufnahme bei Heuschrecken. Articulata 16(1/2), 6974.Google Scholar
Tscharntke, T., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Kruess, A. & Thies, C. (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecological Research 17, 229239.Google Scholar
Uvarov, B.P. (1966) Grasshoppers and Locust. A Handbook of General Acridology, Volume 1. UK, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uvarov, B.P. (1977) Grasshoppers and Locust. A Handbook of General Acridology, Volume II. London, UK, Centre for Overseas Pest Research.Google Scholar
Van Huizen, T.H.P. (1980) Bouw van loopkevers en algemene technieken van onderzoek. U.N. Biologisch Statation Wijster, Afd. Zoölogie, Wageningen, Landbouwhogeschool.Google Scholar
Vieira, R. (1989) Régimen alimenticio y consumo de gramíneas y brezos en adultos de Aiolopus strepens (Latreille, 1804) y Chorthippus parallelus (Zetterstedt, 1821) (Orthoptera: Acrididae): un estudio comparado. Boletín de la Asociación española de Entomología 13, 343352.Google Scholar
Voisin, J.F. (2003) Atlas des Orthoptères (Insecta: Orthoptera) et des Mantides (Insecta: Mantodea) de France. Patrimoines Naturels 60, 1104.Google Scholar
Waloff, N. (1950) The egg pods of British short-horned grasshoppers (Acrididae). pp. 115126 in Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London. Series A, General Entomology, London, UK.Google Scholar
Wall, R. & Begon, M. (1987) Population density, phenotype and reproductive output in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus . Ecological Entomology 12, 331339.Google Scholar
Williams, L.H. (1954) The feeding habits and food preferences of Acrididae and the factors which determine them. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 105(Pt.18), 423454.Google Scholar
Wingerden, W.K.R.E., Musters, J.C.M. & Maaskamp, F.I.M. (1991) The influence of temperature on the duration of egg development in West European grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 87, 417423.Google Scholar
Wunder, U.K. (2001) Einfluss von Habitatstrukturen auf das Vorkommen von Heuschrecken (Orthoptera: Saltatoria) im Pfynwald (VS) . Dissertation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Zhu, D.H., Cui, S.S., Fan, Y.S. & Liu, Z. (2013) Adaptive strategies of overwintering adults: reproductive diapause and mating behavior in a grasshopper, Stenocatantops splendens (Orthoptera: Catantopidae). Insect Science 20, 235244.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Nomination, code, locality and Geographic Coordinates for the sampling plots.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Location of sampling plots in the research area. The plots with presence of C. vagans are marked in grey.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. (a) Abundance (total number of specimens) of males, females and nymphs of C. vagans recorded in each sampling plot during the sampling period 2007–2010. (b) Average number (and standard deviation, SD) of males, females and nymphs of C. vagans/year in each sampling plot during de sampling period 2007–2010.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Field activity-pattern of nymphs and adults of C. vagans.

Figure 4

Table 2. Results of the comparison test of average consumption of C. vagans.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Temporal course of reproductive stage of females (olds, gravids, matures and inmatures) of C. vagans.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Temporal course of the average number (and standard deviation, SD) of eggs/fertile females of C. vagans.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Temporal course of the relation number of egg-pods/number of females of C. vagans.