Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:54:54.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pathogen variation across time and space: sequencing to characterize Mannheimia haemolytica diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2014

Michael L. Clawson*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska, USA
Robert W. Murray
Affiliation:
Zoetis, Global Therapeutic Research, 333 Portage Street, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: mike.clawson@ars.usda.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) is a major animal health and economic issue that affects cattle industries worldwide. Within the USA, the beef cattle industry loses up to an estimated 1 billion dollars a year due to BRDC. There are many contributors to BRDC, including environmental stressors and viral and/or bacterial infections. One species of bacteria in particular, Mannheimia haemolytica, is recognized as the major cause of severe fibrinonecrotic pneumonia in cattle. M. haemolytica is an opportunistic pathogen that normally populates the upper respiratory tract of cattle, and invades the lower respiratory tract in stressed and/or virally infected cattle by mechanisms that are not completely understood. However, not all M. haemolytica appear to be equally pathogenic to cattle. Thus, a test could be developed to distinguish M. haemolytica genetic subtypes by their propensity to cause respiratory disease, allowing isolation and/or treatment of cattle harboring strains with an increased propensity to cause disease. To that end, the genomes of over 300 M. haemolytica strains are being sequenced.

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014

Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC)

BRDC manifests from multiple causes and predisposing factors (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Fulton, Lehenbauer, Step and Confer2010; Caswell, Reference Caswell2014). Viruses, including bovine coronavirus (BCV), bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1), bovine parainfluenza virus type 3 (BPIV-3), bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) cause or predispose cattle to BRDC (Caswell, Reference Caswell2014). Bacteria, including Bibersteinia trehalosi, Histophilus somni, Mannheimia haemolytica, Mycoplasma bovis, and Pasteurella multocida, many of which are normal flora of the bovine upper respiratory tract, cause BRDC (Caswell, Reference Caswell2014). Additionally, a myriad of environmental factors contribute to BRDC, including transportation, sale barn auctions, and comingling (Cusak et al., Reference Cusak, McMeniman and Lean2003; Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Fulton, Lehenbauer, Step and Confer2010). Thus, BRDC manifests from complicated interactions between and within individuals of a population, the stressors they are subjected to, and the microbes that they harbor, including those that act as opportunistic pathogens.

Mannheimia haemolytica

M. haemolytica is a primary agent of fibrinonecrotic pneumonia in cattle and a major bacterial component of BRDC (Rice et al., Reference Rice, Carrasco-Medina, Hodgins and Shewen2008); the bacteria is classified within the Pasteurellaceae family and is represented by distinct Gram-negative, nonmotile bacteria that may be either rods or coccobacilli, and that share a number of metabolic and/or biochemical phenotypes (Angen et al., Reference Angen, Mutters, Caugant, Olsen and Bisgaard1999a, Mutters et al., Reference Mutters, Angen, Bisgard and Garrity2005). When grown on blood agar plates, M. haemolytica colonies may be surrounded by a distinct zone of β-hemolysis, due to production of leukotoxin (LKT), which is a major virulence factor (Mutters et al., Reference Mutters, Angen, Bisgard and Garrity2005, Singh et al., Reference Singh, Ritchey and Confer2011). Importantly, M. haemolytica is a commensal organism of the bovine nasopharynx and tonsilar crypts (Shoo et al., Reference Shoo, Wiseman, Allan, Dalgleish, Gibbs, Al-Hendi and Selman1990; Radostits et al., Reference Radostits, Gay, Blood, Hinchcliff and Saunders2000). However, when animals are environmentally stressed and/or immuncompromized by viral infections, M. haemolytica can invade the lungs, evade the host immune response, and cause pulmonary inflammation with leukocyte damage and apoptosis due to LKT, lipopolysaccharide, and other virulence factors, and eventual death of the bovine host (Radostits et al., Reference Radostits, Gay, Blood, Hinchcliff and Saunders2000).

Considerable evidence shows that M. haemolytica bacteria are genetically and phenotypically diverse, and that distinct subsets of M. haemolytica associate with disease, whereas others do not (Frank and Smith, Reference Frank and Smith1983; Quirie et al., Reference Quirie, Donachie and Gilmour1986; Rice et al., Reference Rice, Carrasco-Medina, Hodgins and Shewen2008; Klima et al., Reference Klima, Alexander, Hendrick and Mcallister2014). M. haemolytica are typically encased in capsules, which are virulence factors that interfere with host cellular phagocytosis (Chae et al., Reference Chae, Gentry, Confer and Anderson1990). There are 12 capsular serotypes for M. haemolytica (A1, A2, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A12, A13, A14, A16, and A17) (Angen et al., Reference Angen, Quirie, Donachie and Bisgaard1999b). Isolates of serotypes A2 and A4 are commonly found in the upper respiratory tract of healthy cattle, and rarely in the lungs of diseased animals. Conversely, isolates of serotype A1 in particular, and also those of serotype A6, are predominantly overrepresented in the lungs of diseased animals. See Rice et al. (Reference Rice, Carrasco-Medina, Hodgins and Shewen2008) and Singh et al. (Reference Singh, Ritchey and Confer2011) for reviews of serotype associations.

In addition to capsular serotyping, M. haemolytica diversity has been characterized using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (Klima et al., Reference Klima, Alexander, Read, Gow, Booker, Hannon, Sheedy, Mcallister and Selinger2011,  Reference Klima, Alexander, Hendrick and Mcallister2014; Timsit et al., Reference Timsit, Christensen, Bareille, Seegers, Bisgaard and Assié2013). This is a technique that detects insertions and/or deletions, genome rearrangements, and, to a smaller extent, nucleotide polymorphisms within microbial genomes through restriction enzyme digests and electrophoretic banding profiles (Kudva et al., Reference Kudva, Evans, Perna, Barrett, Ausubel, Blattner and Calderwood2002; Foley et al., Reference Foley, Lynne and Nayak2009; Goering, Reference Goering2010; Sabat et al., Reference Sabat, Budimir, Nashev, Sá-Leão, Van Dijl, Laurent, Grundmann and Friedrich2013). M. haemolytica isolates originating from the lungs of diseased animals have been found to have PFGE banding profiles that suggest closer genetic similarity to one another than to isolates originating from the upper respiratory tract of non-diseased animals (Klima et al., Reference Klima, Alexander, Hendrick and Mcallister2014). Consequently, two very different techniques that assess microbial diversity, capsular serotyping, and PFGE, both support the notion that M. haemolytica subtypes do not share an equal propensity for associating with, or causing, respiratory disease in cattle. This also indicates that a potential approach to managing or preventing bovine respiratory disease attributable to M. haemolytica could involve testing cattle for the subtypes they are harboring, and isolating and/or treating those that are harboring strains with an increased propensity to cause disease.

Goals and approach

The goals of this ongoing project are to (1) identify fundamental genetic variation within M. haemolytica strains of North America; (2) develop a set of nucleotide polymorphisms to detect that variation; and (3) use the set to identify genetic determinants that influence M. haemolytica pathogenicity in cattle. This is being accomplished through whole genome sequencing of M. haemolytica strains that originated from either the upper or lower respiratory tract of cattle that were either (1) clinically ill or deceased, or (2) disease free. Two collections of M. haemolytica strains have been assembled that are comprised of strains isolated from the lungs of clinically ill or deceased cattle throughout North America (Portis et al., Reference Portis, Lindeman, Johansen and Stoltman2012). One collection is being used primarily for the discovery of genetic variation, including nucleotide polymorphisms, and consists of 158 epidemiologically unlinked strains originating from cattle within 35 US states, as well as the Canadian provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Saskatchewan. The strains were isolated from beef or dairy cattle from 2002 to 2011, with a majority originating from beef animals. The second collection is being used primarily for validation of the discovery collection, and consists of 163 epidemiologically unlinked strains originating from 29 US states, as well as the Canadian provinces of Alberta, Ontario, and Saskatchewan. Strains of the validation collection were isolated from beef or dairy cattle from 2002 to 2011, with a higher representation of dairy cattle germplasm than the discovery population. These two collections represent a deep sampling of North American M. haemolytica genetic subtypes that cause or associate with respiratory disease. Additionally, a third M. haemolytica collection has just recently been assembled that is comprised of strains isolated from the nasopharnynx of US cattle that were not afflicted with respiratory disease.

Whole genome sequencing of the M. haemolytica strains from the collections described above will reveal genetic diversity across the entire genome that will serve as a roadmap for defining M. haemolytica subtypes, and for testing them for an association with respiratory disease. Tests will be developed that will identify M. haemolytica subtypes. The results from this study will be published and placed into the public domain for use without restriction.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank diagnostic labs at the following institutions for their donations of M. haemolytica strains: Cornell University, Iowa State University, Kansas State University, Michigan State University, North Carolina Veterinary Diagnostic Center, Ohio Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Pennsylvania State University, South Dakota State University, Texas A&M University, University of Saskatchewan, UC Davis, University of Guelph, University of Illinois, University of Minnesota, the University of Wisconsin, and Washington State University. The authors also thank Professor J. Dustin Loy and the University of Nebraska for donated strains.

References

Angen, Ø, Mutters, R, Caugant, DA, Olsen, JE and Bisgaard, M (1999a). Taxonomic relationships of the [Pasteurella] haemolytica complex as evaluated by DNA-DNA hybridizations and 16S rRNA sequencing with proposal of Mannheimia haemolytica gen. nov., comb. nov., Mannheimia granulomatis comb. nov., Mannheimia glucosida sp. nov., Mannheimia ruminalis sp. nov., and Mannheimia varigena sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 49: 6786.Google Scholar
Angen, Ø, Quirie, M, Donachie, W and Bisgaard, M (1999b). Investigations on the species specificity of Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica serotyping. Veterinary Microbiology 65: 283290.Google Scholar
Caswell, JL (2014). Failure of respiratory defenses in the pathogenesis of bacterial pneumonia of cattle. Veterinary Pathology 51: 393409.Google Scholar
Chae, CH, Gentry, MJ, Confer, AW and Anderson, GA (1990). Resistance to host immune defense mechanisms afforded by capsular material of Pasteurella haemolytica, serotype 1. Veterinary Microbiology 25: 241251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cusak, PMV, McMeniman, N and Lean, IJ (2003). The medicine and epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease in feedlots. Australian Veterinary Journal 81: 480487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, SL, Lynne, AM and Nayak, R (2009). Molecular typing methodologies for microbial source tracking and epidemiological investigations of Gram-negative bacterial foodborne pathogens. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 9: 430440.Google Scholar
Frank, GH and Smith, PC (1983). Prevalence of Pasteurella haemolytica in transported calves. American Journal of Veterinary Research 44: 981985.Google Scholar
Goering, RV (2010). Pulsed field gel electrophoresis: a review of application and interpretation in the molecular epidemiology of infectious disease. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 10: 866875.Google Scholar
Klima, CI, Alexander, TW, Read, RR, Gow, SP, Booker, CW, Hannon, S, Sheedy, C, Mcallister, TA and Selinger, LB (2011). Genetic characterization and antimicrobial susceptibilty of Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from the nasopharynx of feedlot cattle. Veterinary Microbiology 149: 390398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, CL, Alexander, TW, Hendrick, S and Mcallister, TA (2014). Characterization of Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from feedlot cattle that were healthy or treated for bovine respiratory disease. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 78: 3845.Google ScholarPubMed
Kudva, IT, Evans, PS, Perna, NT, Barrett, TJ, Ausubel, FM, Blattner, FR and Calderwood, SB (2002). Strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7 differ primarily by insertions or deletions, not single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Journal of Bacteriology 184: 1873–9.Google Scholar
Mutters, R, Angen, Ø and Bisgard, M (2005). Genus V. Mannheimia. In: Garrity, G. (ed) Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd ed.New York: Springer, pp. 907911.Google Scholar
Portis, E, Lindeman, C, Johansen, L and Stoltman, G (2012). A ten-year (2000–2009) study of antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria that cause bovine respiratory disease complex–Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni – in the United States and Canada. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 24: 932944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quirie, M, Donachie, W and Gilmour, NJL (1986). Serotypes of Pasteurella haemolytica from cattle. The Veterinary Record 119: 9394.Google Scholar
Radostits, OM, Gay, CC, Blood, DC and Hinchcliff, KW (2000). In: Saunders, W.B. (ed) Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses. 9th edn.New York: Saunders, pp. 839852.Google Scholar
Rice, JA, Carrasco-Medina, L, Hodgins, DC and Shewen, PE (2008). Mannheimia haemolytica and bovine respiratory disease. Animal Health Research Reviews 8: 117128.Google Scholar
Sabat, S, Budimir, A, Nashev, D, Sá-Leão, R, Van Dijl, JM, Laurent, F, Grundmann, H, Friedrich, A and ESCMID Study Group of Epidemiological Markers (ESGEM) (2013). Overview of molecular typing methods for outbreak detection and epidemiological surveillance. Eurosurveillance 18: 20380.Google Scholar
Shoo, MK, Wiseman, A, Allan, EM, Dalgleish, RG, Gibbs, HA, Al-Hendi, AB and Selman, IE (1990). Distribution of Pasteurella haemolytica in the respiratory tracts of carrier calves and those subsequently infected experimentally with Dictyocaulus viviparus. Research in Veterinary Science 48: 383385.Google Scholar
Singh, K, Ritchey, JW and Confer, AW (2011). Mannheimia haemolytica: Bacterial-Host Interactions in Bovine Pneumonia. Veterinary Pathology 48: 338348.Google Scholar
Taylor, JD, Fulton, RW, Lehenbauer, TW, Step, DL and Confer, AW (2010). The epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease: what is the evidence for predisposing factors? The Canadian Veterinary Journal 51: 10951102.Google Scholar
Timsit, E, Christensen, H, Bareille, N, Seegers, H, Bisgaard, M and Assié, S (2013). Transmission dynamics of Mannheimia haemolytica in newly-received beef bulls at fattening operations. Veterinary Microbiology 161: 195304.Google Scholar