Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:23:20.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antarctic Futures: human engagement with the Antarctic environmentEdited by Tina Tin, Daniela Liggett, Machiel Lamers & Patrick T. Maher Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelburg, London, 2013. ISBN 978-94-007-6581-8, 360 pp. £90.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2014 

This book attempts a timely task of trying to bring the many strands of human impact on Antarctica together and make a stab at predicting the changes likely to occur over the next 50 years. The 35 authors have varying degrees of experience of Antarctic Treaty meetings but all have relevant Antarctic experience in one form or another. Of course, the Committee on Environmental Protection at the annual Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting is specifically charged with oversight of almost all the activities reviewed but access to its deliberations is limited and much of the dialogue there is both less well informed than this book and often ends up being politicised. This volume tries to focus on the published data and what we can learn from it, although politics necessarily intrudes through discussion of governance. With 15 chapters, the scope is wide but still not complete.

The Introduction gives a useful potted history of human discovery and exploitation in respect of whaling and sealing, research stations, tourism and fishing and then considers briefly how these impact the continent and surrounding sea, before outlining the governance tools used to manage these. Since the authors of this chapter apparently intended to provide here a conceptual framework for the rest of the book I was quite surprised that the framework was simply half a paragraph in the very short conclusions and consisted of three rather open ended questions. Surely a conceptual framework could be rather more, establishing a wider brief in which the human impacts could be seen to interact in various ways? My conceptual framework would have asked what role the Antarctic environment played at a global scale, how was its functionality damaged by historic impacts, what was the relative importance now of direct impacts versus indirect impacts on present and future functionality, what needed to be assessed to make management decisions, was the management/governance tool set adequate and if not why not and then how these elements interacted in predicting the future. Many of these elements are considered in the following chapters but not within a conceptual framework, rather at a practical level.

The book is in four parts with a few pages of summary at the end of each of the first three parts. Interestingly, the chapters are framed like stand-alone scientific papers rather than as connected chapters of a single book.

Part I considers Species and Ecosystems and in six chapters looks at Antarctic wildlife, marine living resources including whales, biota transfers and, rather curiously, trampling on Antarctic soils. Woehler et al. give over much of their chapter on wildlife to predicting what the impacts will be by 2060. They exclude climate change as a driver which is a shame as it interacts with all of the other elements they examine. Miller’s account of fisheries focusses largely on krill and is especially useful in its evaluations of risk and uncertainty, and whilst questions of enforcement and compliance are important he identifies climate change as the major future management problem. The conclusions of the whaling chapter, not surprisingly, concentrate on “Special Permit” whaling and do not recognise that the lack of current research on Southern Ocean whales is one of the problems in improving their conservation. Why is there so little research if the whales are seen as such a major political issue? The chapter on movement of biota is excellent on terrestrial species but seems to have ignored the potential for marine invasions, not least from carriage on the increasing number of ships. The final chapter deals with direct surficial impacts from both national programmes and tourism and considers a growing problem. What would have been interesting is a chapter on the impacts caused by research and its supporting logistics with an assessment of the value of knowledge gained against the damage caused.

Part II contains three regional case studies - Fildes Peninsula, Deception Island and McMurdo Station. I was especially impressed by these as they provide examples of how monitoring for impacts and change can be conducted where the drivers come from science, tourism and logistics in different degrees. They also examine the different approaches to managing the three areas that I am certain contain important lessons for the immediate future that could and should be applied more widely.

Part III, called “Actors and Sectors”, is made up of five chapters dealing with values, wilderness, tourism, environmental challenges for national programmes and an unusual chapter on strategic thinking in environmental governance. The chapter on values emphasises the obvious but often overlooked point that each of the Treaty Parties brings a different cultural attitude to its participation, flavoured by history, language and politics. Roura and Tin provide critical comments on the failure to articulate a strategic vision and suggest that it would be good to “reboot” the ATS to reinvigorate it, although quite how this could be done is not stated. What they do provide is an aspirational vision for the Antarctic wilderness that I hope will be reflected in the next conservation strategy. Regulating tourism is a longstanding discussion area but Jabour offers a new idea in the adoption of tourist operators by sponsoring states, but given the legal liabilities entailed this seems unlikely to happen. The challenges facing national operators are summarised by Sanchez & Njaastad and whilst they recognise progress in many areas through COMNAP the differing remits and financing of operators, together with their political direction by home governments, make achieving best practice in almost any field unlikely. The fact that some MNAPs still have not appointed an environmental officer over 20 years after the Protocol was agreed is surely a matter of great concern. As for their contention that station numbers will not increase - I beg to differ. Lamers et al. discuss the need for strategic thinking, especially since the Treaty has found many ways to avoid dealing with contentious issues with later consequences. I would hope that some of their ideas are discussed in the CEP to test them against the real politik.

The final section is the conclusions, where the editors try to tie the rather disparate elements together. Perhaps surprisingly, the general conclusion is not that more environmental legislation is needed but simply proper implementation of the tools already available, which would include better information sharing, and a more ready acceptance of good practice from elsewhere in the world. Although they do not mention in perhaps the current SCAR initiative towards a new Conservation Strategy will help in progressing some of their specific suggestions? They conclude with an examination of human motivations and future challenges. Whilst the contentious subject of “scientific whaling” may now have been settled by the International Court judgement, there are still important unresolved questions over bioprospecting, the Law of the Sea, and the hypocrisy of several states in their dealings with CCAMLR. If the sovereignty claims remain a major driver of national activities for some countries then progress towards a utopian state of sustainable environmental management for the good of all will never be achieved. I applaud their final sentiments - that we need to change from Business as Usual - but conclude that the nasty world of geopolitics is only driven by power, greed and national agendas so progress here will be very slow, if indeed there is any progress.

This is an important volume and a very useful attempt to bring together many of the separate and topical environmental strands that concern the ATS and connect them with the social sciences, which have been rather neglected in the Antarctic. It should be required reading for all CEP delegates. Many of the chapters provide valuable overviews of where we are in specific fields, which will make this volume a useful reference to have to hand, whilst the attempt to predict the future state in each area is certainly likely to stimulate discussion.