During lactation, the mammary gland of dairy cows undergoes dramatic physiological and metabolic changes in support of lactogenesis and then milk secretion. When milk removal ceases, the dairy cow requires a 6 to 8-week dry period. The dry period is a non-lactating state initiated between lactation cycles that allows for optimal milk yield in the subsequent lactation period through the turnover of older, senescent mammary epithelial cells and their replacement with new, active cells (Capuco et al. Reference Capuco, Akers and Smith1997). The transition from lactation to the dry period is mediated by large-scale changes in gene expression. Limited studies have used quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and transcriptome analysis to evaluate the molecular events occurring in the mammary gland between lactation and early involution (Dado-Senn et al. Reference Dado-Senn, Skibiel, Fabris, Zhang, Dahl, Penagaricano and Laporta2018), but none have rigorously compared mammary glands during the peak stage of lactation and the mid-dry period to evaluate how each physiological stage is supported by broad-spectrum shifts in gene expression.
Digital gene expression (DGE), a tag-based transcriptome sequencing method, is a powerful approach to evaluate global gene expression in tissues or cells of interest in response to changes in physiological state (‘t Hoen et al. Reference ‘t Hoen, Ariyurek, Thygesen, Vreugdenhil, Vossen, de Menezes, Boer, van Ommen and den Dunnen2008). DGE has been applied to evaluate the molecular events occurring during the onset of lactation in the mammary gland of dairy cows (Gao et al. Reference Gao, Lin, Shi, Yan and Wang2013). Here we used DGE to examine global gene expression in dairy cow mammary glands between the peak stage of lactation and the mid-dry period. Genes and pathways identified by the present study will provide fundamental insights into tissue remodeling during the dry period, as well as a better understanding of milk production during lactation.
Materials and methods
All experimental procedures involving animals were approved by Northeast Agricultural University (China). Six multiparous Holstein cows with similar genetic backgrounds were used in the study. Among them, three were lactating cows during the peak lactation stage (after their third parity, milk yield = 33·9 ± 2·1 kg/d), and three were pregnant and dried off after being milked for 310 d (milk yield = 33·2 ± 1·4 kg/d for the previous lactation period). The lactating cows were slaughtered at 90 DIM, and the dry cows were slaughtered at 30 d after dry off. Approximately 50 g of mammary parenchymal tissue was collected from the mid-alveolar region of each cow.
Extraction of total RNA from 100 mg of homogenized mammary tissue from each cow was performed using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA) and was purified using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Netherlands). Then a total of 6 µg extracted RNA per cow was used for DGE library construction (details in Supplementary File 1). Each library was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 system (BGI, Beijing). Clean tags were generated by removing empty tags, low-quality tags, and tags with only one copy number. All clean tags were aligned to the bovine reference genome (UMD3·1, ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-79/fasta/bos_taurus/dna/), and unambiguous tags were annotated. For gene expression analysis, the number of unambiguous clean tags for each gene was calculated and then normalized to the number of transcripts per million clean tags.
A statistical analysis of the frequency of each tag in the different DGE libraries was performed to compare the differences in gene expression. A false discovery rate of ≤0·001 and an absolute value of log 2 ratio ≥ 1 were used as cutoffs to judge the significance of gene expression differences. qPCR analysis was used to validate the DGE results.
The selected genes with significant differential expression in lactating cows and dry cows were analyzed in the context of Gene Ontology (GO) terms biological process, molecular function, and cell component (http://www.geneontology.org/). A corrected P value of <0·05 was selected as the threshold for significant enrichment of the gene sets. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway visualization for the comparison of lactating cows and dry cows was performed using the application KeggArray available in the KEGG website at http://genome.jp/kegg/. Pathways with P < 0·05 were considered strongly enriched in DGE.
Results and discussion
We identified 741 transcripts that were significantly differentially expressed between the early lactation period and the mid-dry period. Of these, 214 genes were up-regulated and 527 genes were down-regulated in the mammary glands of lactating cows compared with those of dry cows (Table 1). Validation of a subset of these genes by qPCR (online Supplementary Fig. S1, Table S1) indicated that our DGE profiling analysis is of high quality and is biologically relevant.
SFC, signed fold change.
The gene list is part of differentially expressed genes in DGE analysis.
To identify the biological pathways that were highly enriched in mammary glands of lactating cows vs. dry cows, all the DEGs were mapped to the terms in the KEGG database and compared with the whole transcriptome background. Pathway mapping using the KEGG showed that 579 DEGs had pathway annotations that were related to 204 pathways. The specific enrichment of genes was observed in the metabolic pathway in the mammary glands of lactating cows compared with those of the dry cows (Fig. 1a), which is consistent with the increased metabolic activity of the mammary gland during lactation.
The DEGs were then analyzed in the context of the GO categories biological process, molecular function, and cellular component. This analysis revealed that the majority of these DEGs are associated with the cellular process term in the biological process ontology category, with the cell and cell part terms in the cellular component ontology category, and with the binding term in the molecular function ontology category (Fig. 1b).
Consistent with the KEGG results, the GO analysis revealed that one of the major GO biological processes is metabolic process. Among the 214 up-regulated genes in lactating mammary tissues as compared with dry cow mammary tissues, 58 were associated with metabolic process (online Supplementary Table S2). During lactation, the mammary epithelial cells synthesize and secrete copious amounts of carbohydrate, protein, and lipid. Our DGE data showed that the expression of milk protein genes increased remarkably in mammary glands of lactating cows as compared with dry cows (online Supplementary Table S3). We also observed that genes associated with fatty acid (FA) uptake from blood (LPL, CD36), intracellular FA trafficking (FABP3), long-chain (ACSL1) and short-chain (ACSS2) intracellular FA activation, de novo FA synthesis (ACACA, FASN), FA desaturation (SCD), triacylglycerol synthesis (GPAT4, GPAM), and transcription regulation (PPARGC1A) were up-regulated in mammary glands of lactating cows as compared with dry cows. This is consistent with the findings of Bionaz & Loor (Reference Bionaz and Loor2008), which indicated that lactation induced increased mRNAs of genes involved in the de novo synthesis of FAs, FA desaturation, and the synthesis of triacylglycerol.
During lactation, mammary epithelial cells secrete large quantities of milk. Casein micelles are secreted by exocytosis of Golgi-derived secretory vesicles, whereas lipids are released as milk fat globules by budding of the apical plasma membrane of mammary epithelial cells (Truchet et al. Reference Truchet, Chat and Ollivier-Bousquet2014). In this study, GO analysis revealed that several highly expressed genes were associated with vesicle-mediated transport in lactating mammary tissues, which reflects the increased secretion activity of the mammary gland. Highly expressed vesicle-related genes included ras-related protein Rab-18 (RAB18), double C2-like domain-containing protein gamma (DOC2G), and vesicle-associated membrane protein 1 (VAMP1). In addition, we also detected higher expression of the cell death activator CIDEA in lactating cows as compared with dry cows, which functions in milk lipid secretion in mice (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Lv, Zhang, Shui, Qian, Zhang, Chen, Ye, Xie, Shen, Wenk and Li2012). These genes may be involved in maintaining the secretory activity of mammary epithelial cells during lactation and may, therefore, serve as target genes for manipulation of lactation performance.
We also observed that 32 of the up-regulated genes (of 214 transcripts) in mammary tissues during early lactation as compared with mid-dry period were associated with GO category involved in transport (online Supplementary Table S4). During lactation, mammary gland requirements for FAs, amino acids, glucose, and other nutrients for milk synthesis surge dramatically. The up-regulated genes in lactation that are involved in the FA transport process included FABP3 and CD36; a gene involved in glucose transport was tribbles pseudokinase 3 (TRIB3), and those involved in the amino acid transport process were solute carrier family 38 member 3 (SLC38A3), solute carrier family 7 member 5 (SLC7A5) and solute carrier family 22 member 16 (SLC22A16). SLC7A5 is a sodium-independent transporter mediating the cellular uptake of essential amino acids. Our data showed an increase in SLC7A5 mRNA that was approximately twofold in lactating cows relative to dry cows. This is in accord with previous data showing that in dairy cows, a large up-regulation in expression of SLC7A5 was observed during lactation relative to pregnancy (Bionaz & Loor, Reference Bionaz and Loor2011). Therefore, targeted expression of SLC7A5 may be a useful intervention to improve milk protein synthesis in dairy cows.
With respect to cell proliferation, the GO analysis showed ≥30 significantly down-regulated genes in lactating cows relative to dry cows (online Supplementary Table S5). The mammary gland is a dynamic organ that undergoes cycles of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis during adult life. In pregnant dry cows, there is a significant increase in cell proliferation from the early to late dry period, as quantified by in vitro incorporation of [3H]-thymidine (Capuco et al. Reference Capuco, Akers and Smith1997). In our study, the higher expression of genes involved in proliferation in dry cows indicates that, during the dry period, the epithelial compartment is replacing old senescent cells with new cells and cells are preparing to synthesize proteins and lipids that are necessary for lactation. The mammary epithelium is closely linked to the stroma through the basement membrane extracellular matrix. Stromal cells influence epithelial cell behavior by secreting growth factors. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) produced by stromal cells acts in a paracrine fashion on mammary epithelial cells to stimulate cell proliferation (Collier et al. Reference Collier, Annen-Dawson and Pezeshki2012). Fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) likely functions as a paracrine mitogen for mammary epithelial cells, and its highest level of expression is in primiparous heifers during involution (Sinowatz et al. Reference Sinowatz, Schams, Habermann, Berisha and Vermehren2006). In our study, we observed an increase in the expression of IGF1, FGF1, and other growth factors during the dry period. This is consistent with a role for these growth factors in the stimulation of cell proliferation.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that 741 transcripts were significantly differentially expressed in mammary glands of dairy cows between early lactation period and mid-dry period. In dairy cows, lactation is supported by increased gene expression related to metabolic processes and nutrient transport. Mammary tissue remodeling during the mid-dry period is supported by increased gene expression related to cell proliferation. The identification of enriched genes and pathways in the present study will provide fundamental insights into tissue remodeling during the dry period, as well as a better understanding of lactation.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029919000049.
Financial support
This work was supported by grants from the University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province (UNPYSCT-2015010, China).