Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T12:58:23.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of fatty acid profile in milk fat of Wallachian sheep during lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2019

Martin Ptáček*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague – Suchdol, Czech Republic
Michal Milerski
Affiliation:
Genetics and breeding of farm animals, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 01 Prague – Uhříněves, Czech Republic
Jaromír Ducháček
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague – Suchdol, Czech Republic
Jitka Schmidová
Affiliation:
Genetics and breeding of farm animals, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 01 Prague – Uhříněves, Czech Republic
Vladimír Tančin
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, National Agricultural and Food Centre, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky, Slovak Republic Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak Agricultural University, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovak Republic
Michal Uhrinčať
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, National Agricultural and Food Centre, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky, Slovak Republic
Luděk Stádník
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague – Suchdol, Czech Republic
Tereza Michlová
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague – Suchdol, Czech Republic
*
Author for correspondence: Martin Ptáček, Email: ptacekm@af.czu.cz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this Research Communication we evaluate the fatty acid (FA) profile of Wallachian sheep milk. The study was performed on 38 ewes in Beskydy Mountains. Samples were collected 4 times during the lactation, at monthly intervals. FA profile as well as groups of saturated, monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) FAs were investigated. Considerable increase over the lactation was detected for lauric, myristic, myristoleic and palmitic acids, while stearic acid showed the opposed tendency. Variability, supported by significant differences among particular days of milk collection, was demonstrated for oleic acid; its highest distribution occurred at the beginning and at the end of the trial. The highest distribution of CLA was at the second sample day. Milk of Wallachian sheep naturally grazed at permanent pasture areas showed higher content of PUFA and MUFA in contrast with intensive or semi-intensive sheep breeds reported in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2019 

The Wallachian sheep is an original Czech breed with a triple production purpose (milk, meat, wool) which is characterized by a medium body size, long coarse hairs with short kemps and lower performance parameters accompanied by adaptability and resistance to harsh climatic conditions (Jandurová et al., Reference Jandurová, Kott, Kottová, Czerneková and Milerski2005; Milerski, Reference Milerski2013). The breed reached the area of Beskydy Mountains during the Wallachian colonization of Carpathians in 15th and 16th centuries (Milerski, Reference Milerski2013). In the second half of 20th century Wallachian sheep were widely crossed with imported sheep breeds, primarily for wool quality and production improvement and by the mid-1980s only a few individuals of original Wallachian sheep survived. Since 1999 Wallachian sheep have been classified among the genetic resources of the Czech Republic. The number of Wallachian sheep increased again and in 2017 a total of 1100 purebred ewes were registered. At present, Wallachian sheep in the Czech Republic are usually not milked, although in the past milk production used to be a substantial part of their combined utilization. The population of milked sheep has been growing during last years in the Czech Republic; such that these sheep represent about 15% of the total recorded flock. Therefore, the importance for sheep milk monitoring increases. The use of Wallachian sheep milking potential would improve the survival probability of this breed and reduce its dependence on governmental subsidies. Wallachian sheep cannot compete with specialized breeds such as Lacaune or East-Friesian in milk yield, but can be promoted for their ability to use mountain pastures and to provide milk of valuable composition and quality. Monitoring of fatty acid (FA) profile in milk fat is important for its close connection with human nutrition and health, or for its contribution to the characteristic flavors of ripened cheese (Haenlein, Reference Haenlein2004; Haug et al., Reference Haug, Høstmark and Harstad2007).

The aim of the present study was to analyze the FA profile in milk fat of Wallachian ewes at different lactation periods and age categories and to compare these results with literature for other breeds of sheep and under other production systems. To the best of the author's knowledge, information about the FA composition of indigenous (unimproved) Wallachian sheep is not available in the literature although Mierlita et al. (Reference Mierlita, Daraban and Lup2011) have examined the FA profile of the phylogenetically related breed Turcana in Romania.

Material and methods

Animals and data collection

The milk samples were collected from 38 purebred Wallachian ewes selected from the flock on 4 occasions from April to August 2015: 27th April, average 42nd day of lactation, 25th May, average 71st day of lactation, 23rd June, average 100th day of lactation, and 4th August, average 142nd day of lactation. The ewes were selected with regard to different age and number of lambs, but all had lambed during a 15 d period. The ewes were suckling their own lambs and were not milked. During the experiment, all animals were kept at pasture in one flock under identical conditions without any differences in nutrition (apart from natural variation in pasture quality) or management. All were healthy and showed no signs of mastitis or other health problems. More information about flock management is given in on-line Supplementary Material and Methods (Flock location and management). Information about milk production in particular collection days and number and sex of lambs were recorded.

Data collection

Milk was sampled according to Doney et al. (Reference Doney, Peart, Smith and Louda1979). The lambs were separated from their mothers and oxytocin was injected intravenously at a dose of 2 UI to ewes to achieve complete milk ejection (including alveolar milk). Sheep were milked individually at the pasture using simple fixation and single bucket milking machine system (Interpuls, vacuum level 38–40 kPa, 100 cycles/min, pulsation ratio 60 : 40). This milk was discarded. After around 6 h (from 317 to 501 min) ewes were again injected with oxytocin and milked to achieve their total milk production, after which they were reunited with their lambs. The exact time interval was recoded for each ewe, to allow calculation of their total 24 h milk production. Milk samples (30 ml) from this second milking were collected in accordance with standard protocols (ICAR, 2012). Samples were frozen (−20 °C) before transfer to laboratories of Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague for FA estimation.

FAs profile estimation

Methods of milk fat extraction, and fatty acid estimation are reported in on-line Supplementary Material and Methods (FAs profile estimation). Percentage content (%) was determined for 45 individual FA, while further evaluation included only FA with more than 0.1% (30 FA). Nevertheless, all the determined FA were used to create groups of SFA, MUFA and PUFA that were also investigated as a part of the evaluation.

Statistical evaluation

Statistical analyses were performed using MIXED procedure of SAS 9.3. (SAS/STAT, 2011). Variables were corrected for the day of milk collection, ewe age category (both fixed effects), nested effect of days in milk within particular days of milk collection and animal as random effects. The description of model equation used for all FA or FA group evaluations is presented in on-line Supplementary Material and Methods. Significance level P < 0.05 was used to evaluate differences among groups.

Results

The basic compositional analysis of the Basic characteristic of Wallachian sheep milk composition is reported in on-line Supplementary File Table S1. Average calculated yield was 0.85 kg/d at a protein, lactose and fat concentration of 5.18%, 5.01% and 6.98%, respectively.

Model description

The model was significant for all the evaluated FA groups, and for all the individual FA.

The FA profile varied significantly according to stage of lactation (sampling day), but the effect of ewe age category was non-significant. Nested effect of days in milk within particular sample day was significant for SFA and MUFA. Significance of factors in model for individual FA are reported in Table 1. Results related to factor of ewe age category are excluded, due to non-significance of this factor in the model for all the evaluated traits.

Table 1. Influence of collection day throughout the lactation on fatty acid profile in milk fat of original Wallachian sheep (LSM ± sem)

DAY = control day of milk collection; DAY 1 = 1st day of milk collection; DAY 2 = 2nd day of milk collection; DAY 3 = 3rd day of milk collection; DAY 4 = 4th day of milk collection; AGE = ewe age category; DIM (DAY) = nested effect of days in milk within particular days of milk collection; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; n.s. = non-significant; Different letters among rows (A, B, C, D) indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 level of significance.

FA groups

Figure 1 shows influence of stage of lactation on FA groups. The SFA percentage increased significantly from the 1st sampling to the 2nd and 3rd (+9.03%); and then slightly decreased (−1.12%). Nevertheless, results obtained during the 1st half of the lactation (1st and 2nd samples) were significantly lower than those detected during the 2nd half of the lactation (3rd and 4th samples). The MUFA showed the opposed tendency to SFA percentage, with significantly lower MUFA percentage at 3rd and 4th samples. PUFA content did not vary between sample days apart from the second sample being lower than later samples (P < 0.05).

Fig. 1. Influence of collection day throughout the lactation on fatty acid groups according to their saturation of original Wallachian sheep. SFA = saturated fatty acids; MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acids; DAY 1 = 1st day of milk collection; DAY 2 = 2nd day of milk collection; DAY 3 = 3rd day of milk collection; DAY 4 = 4th day of milk collection; Different letters among bars within FAs groups (A, B, C, D) indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 level of significance.

FAs profile

The overview of FA profile, having more than 0.1% percentage content in the milk fat, is reported in on-line Supplementary File Table S2. Oleic acid (C18 : 1n9c = 22.00%), palmitic acid (C16 : 0 = 20.04%), stearic acid (C18 : 0 = 15.05%), myristic acid (C14 : 0 = 7.43%), and capric acid (C10 : 0 = 4.20%) were the predominant FA. Significantly lowest butyric acid (C4 : 0) content was demonstrated for the 4th day of milk collection, as presented in Table 1. No significant differences were detected among all the other sampling days for butyric acid. Caproic (C6 : 0), caprylic (C8 : 0), and capric acid (C10 : 0) percentages were characterized by mainly significantly higher values during sample days 2 and 3, while generally lower values were detected in the beginning and at the end of the lactation. A significant increase over the lactation was detected for lauric acid (C12 : 0), myristic acid (C14 : 0), myristoleic acid (C14 : 1) and palmitic acid (C16 : 0). Stearic acid (C18 : 0) showed the opposite change (from 17.00% in early lactation to 12.17%). Oleic acid (C18 : 1n9c) was variable throughout lactation, with higher values at the beginning and at the end of sampling. The highest content of CLA was seen at the 2nd sample day (2.91%), significantly higher than any other sample.

Discussion

We focused on determination of the milk fatty acid profile of Wallachian sheep under extensive Carpathian production system based on grazing and on evaluation of factors connected with lactation stage and the age of ewes. Previous studies have reported about the negative effect of SFA on human health (Haug et al., Reference Haug, Høstmark and Harstad2007). Distribution of SFA content in the present study was 57.99% in average. Other authors reported similar (Carta et al., Reference Carta, Casu, Usai, Addis, Fiori, Fraghì, Miari, Mura, Piredda, Schibler, Sechi, Elsen and Barillet2008) or higher content of SFAs in sheep milk (Markiewicz-Kęszycka et al., Reference Markiewicz-Kęszycka, Czyżak-Runowska, Lipińska and Wójtowski2013; Aguilar et al., Reference Aguilar, Toro-Mujica, Vargas-Bello-Pérez, Vera, Ugalde, Rodriguez and Briones2014). The SFA percentage increased as lactation progressed, which agrees with data for Assaf sheep (Mihaylova et al., Reference Mihaylova, Jahreis, Odjakova and Kafedjev2005; Salari et al., Reference Salari, Altomonte, D'Auria and Martini2018). By contrast, gradually decreasing SFA content related to month of collection was reported for improved Wallachian, Tsigai, Lacaune, and their crossbreds (Meľuchová et al., Reference Meľuchová, Blaško, Kubinec, Górová, Dubravská, Margetín and Soják2008). In general, we observed a lower SFA percentage for our pasture fed sheep than previously published studies. The putative negative health effect of SFA is mainly related to lauric (C12 : 0), myristic (C14 : 0), and palmitic (C16 : 0) FA (Haenlein, Reference Haenlein2004), and we did observe high levels of palmitic and myristic FA in this study. This agrees with earlier data for ovine (De La Fuente et al., Reference De La Fuente, Barbosa, Carriedo, Gonzalo, Arenas, Fresno and San Primitivo2009) and goat milk (Maroteau et al., Reference Maroteau, Palhière, Larroque, Clément, Ferrand, Tosser-Klopp and Rupp2014). Some individual SFA such as butyric (C4 : 0), caprylic (C8 : 0), capric (C10 : 0) and lauric acid (C12 : 0) have been associated with possible health benefits (delayed tumor growth, cancer prevention or antiviral and antibacterial function: Haug et al., Reference Haug, Høstmark and Harstad2007). These FA were also detected at lower concentration than in earlier reports (De La Fuente et al., Reference De La Fuente, Barbosa, Carriedo, Gonzalo, Arenas, Fresno and San Primitivo2009; Maroteau et al., Reference Maroteau, Palhière, Larroque, Clément, Ferrand, Tosser-Klopp and Rupp2014).

PUFAs or MUFAs have been suggested to have favorable effects on human health (Haenlein, Reference Haenlein2004). We observed higher PUFA and MUFA percentage than earlier reports for sheep milk (Markiewicz-Kęszycka et al., Reference Markiewicz-Kęszycka, Czyżak-Runowska, Lipińska and Wójtowski2013; Aguilar et al., Reference Aguilar, Toro-Mujica, Vargas-Bello-Pérez, Vera, Ugalde, Rodriguez and Briones2014, both unspecified breed), sheep milk of Improved Wallachian, Tsigai, Lacaune sheep, and their crossbreds kept under different feeding regimes (Ostrovský et al., Reference Ostrovský, Pavlíková, Blaško, Górová, Kubinec, Margetín and Soják2009) or sheep milk from Spanish genetic resources (Signorelli et al., Reference Signorelli, Contarini, Annicchiarico, Napolitano, Orrù, Catillo, Haenlein and Moioli2008). MUFA and PUFA concentrations decreasing across lactation has been reported by Mihaylova et al. (Reference Mihaylova, Jahreis, Odjakova and Kafedjev2005) and our data agree with this, in contrast to the increase reported by Meľuchová et al. (Reference Meľuchová, Blaško, Kubinec, Górová, Dubravská, Margetín and Soják2008) or lack of consistent variation reported by Salari et al. (Reference Salari, Altomonte, D'Auria and Martini2018) for Assaf ewes.

Oleic acid has been reported to decrease during the course of lactation (Signorelli et al., Reference Signorelli, Contarini, Annicchiarico, Napolitano, Orrù, Catillo, Haenlein and Moioli2008; De La Fuente et al., Reference De La Fuente, Barbosa, Carriedo, Gonzalo, Arenas, Fresno and San Primitivo2009) but our results and those of Meľuchová et al. (Reference Meľuchová, Blaško, Kubinec, Górová, Dubravská, Margetín and Soják2008) and Martini et al. (Reference Martini, Altomonte and Salari2013) do not support any significant effect of lactation stage. The main representatives of PUFAs in milk are the linoleic and alpha-linolenic FA (Haug et al., Reference Haug, Høstmark and Harstad2007); both increased across lactation in our study in agreement with De La Fuente et al. (Reference De La Fuente, Barbosa, Carriedo, Gonzalo, Arenas, Fresno and San Primitivo2009), however, Martini et al. (Reference Martini, Altomonte and Salari2013) saw no such effect in sheep of the Massese breed.

CLA has been reported to lower plasma cholesterol status and has putative anticarcinogenic effects (Haug et al., Reference Haug, Høstmark and Harstad2007). De La Fuente et al. (Reference De La Fuente, Barbosa, Carriedo, Gonzalo, Arenas, Fresno and San Primitivo2009) found an increased CLA content across the lactation period in Churra ewes, whereas we observed higher levels overall, but no effect of stage of lactation. Our CLA levels were also higher than Sarda sheep (Buccioni et al., Reference Buccioni, Serra, Minieri, Mannelli, Cappucci, Benvenuti, Rapaccini, Conte and Mele2015) or than sheep and goats naturally grazed in mountainous highlands of Greece (Talpur et al., Reference Talpur, Bhanger and Memon2009). Still higher levels have been reported for crossbred Tsigai ewes reared in Rodopi Mountains (Mihaylova et al., Reference Mihaylova, Jahreis, Odjakova and Kafedjev2005) and the phylogenetically related Turcana breed (Mierlita et al., Reference Mierlita, Daraban and Lup2011).

These differences in FA profile may relate to specific genotypes but will also be influenced by environmental effects, especially plane of nutrition (Manso et al., Reference Manso, Gallardo and Guerra-Rivas2016). Green pasture, an important source of unsaturated FA, positively affects PUFA and MUFA content in milk fat (Nudda et al., Reference Nudda, Bcguire, Battacone and Pulina2005), increasing the content of alpha-linolenic (Joy et al., Reference Joy, Ripoll, Molino, Dervishi and Álves-Rodríguez2012) or CLA fatty acids (De Renobales et al., Reference De Renobales, Amores, Arranz, Vitro, Barrón, Bustamante, Ruiz De Gordoa, Nájera, Valdivielso, Abilleira, Beltrán De Heredia, Pérez-Elortondo, Ruiz, Albisu and Mandaluniz2012) amongst others. As pasture matures the content of unsaturated FA decreases (Lock and Bauman, Reference Lock and Bauman2004). Additionally, some phenolic compound in plants, such as tannis, affect ruminal fermentation, and thus might also affect the fatty acid profile of milk (Vasta et al., Reference Vasta, Nudda, Cannas, Lanza and Priolo2008). However, the traditional Carpathian system did not allow us to monitor pasture intake as the animals were able to browse at will. The pasture contained grasses and herbs in the typical botanical composition characterized for the Eastern location of the White Carpathians and for the Beskydy Mountains.

In conclusion, the milk FA profile of Wallachian sheep kept in mountain conditions of Moravian-Silesian Beskydy were changing in the course of the grazing period. Content of SFAs increased from May to August, while proportion of MUFAs showed a downward trend as the phase of lactation progressed. The main cause of these changes may relate to pasture quality. Compared to literature reports, we observed a better saturated:unsaturated FA ratio and a higher content of CLA. Even though we are not able to separate genetic and environmental effects explicitly, the consequence of their common impact shows, that Wallachian ewes grazed on mountain pastures provide high nutritional and health valuable milk. This could help to increase the population size of this animal genetic resource and its wider use for milk production.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029919000244

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by S grant of MEYS, and by QJ1310107, and MZERO0718 projects.

References

Aguilar, C, Toro-Mujica, P, Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E, Vera, R, Ugalde, C, Rodriguez, S and Briones, I (2014) A comparative study of the fatty acid profiles in commercial sheep cheeses. Grasas y Aceites 65, e048.Google Scholar
Buccioni, A, Serra, A, Minieri, S, Mannelli, F, Cappucci, A, Benvenuti, D, Rapaccini, S, Conte, G and Mele, M (2015) Milk production, composition, and milk fatty acid profile from grazing sheep fed diets supplemented with chestnut tannin extract and extruded linseed. Small Ruminant Research 130, 200207.Google Scholar
Carta, A, Casu, S, Usai, MG, Addis, M, Fiori, M, Fraghì, A, Miari, S, Mura, L, Piredda, G, Schibler, L, Sechi, T, Elsen, JM and Barillet, F (2008) Investigating the genetic component of fatty acid content in sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research 79, 2228.Google Scholar
De La Fuente, LF, Barbosa, E, Carriedo, JA, Gonzalo, C, Arenas, R, Fresno, JM and San Primitivo, F (2009) Factors influencing variation of fatty acid content in ovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 37913799.Google Scholar
De Renobales, M, Amores, G, Arranz, J, Vitro, M, Barrón, LJR, Bustamante, MA, Ruiz De Gordoa, JC, Nájera, AI, Valdivielso, I, Abilleira, E, Beltrán De Heredia, I, Pérez-Elortondo, FJ, Ruiz, R, Albisu, M and Mandaluniz, N (2012) Part-time grazing improves sheep milk production and its nutritional characteristics. Food Chemistry 130, 9096.Google Scholar
Doney, JM, Peart, JN, Smith, WF and Louda, F (1979) A consideration of the techniques for estimation of milk yield by suckled sheep and a comparison of estimates obtained by two methods in relation to the effect of breed, level of production and stage of lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science 92, 123132.Google Scholar
Haenlein, GFW (2004) Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Ruminant Research 51, 155163.Google Scholar
Haug, A, Høstmark, AT and Harstad, OM (2007) Bovine milk in human nutrition – a review. Lipids in Health and Disease 6, 25.Google Scholar
International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR) (2012) International Agreement of Recordings Practices—Guidelines Approved by the General Assembly Held in Cork Ireland on June 2012. Rome, Italy: ICARGoogle Scholar
Jandurová, OM, Kott, T, Kottová, B, Czerneková, V and Milerski, M (2005) Genetic relationships among Šumava, Valachian and Improved Valachian sheep. Small Ruminant Research 57, 157165.Google Scholar
Joy, M, Ripoll, G, Molino, F, Dervishi, E and Álves-Rodríguez, J (2012) Influence of the type of forage supplied to ewes in pre- and post-partum periods on the meat fatty acids of suckling lambs. Meat Science 90, 775782.Google Scholar
Lock, AL and Bauman, DE (2004) Modifying milk fat composition of dairy cows to enhance fatty acids beneficial to human health. Lipids 39, 11971206.Google Scholar
Manso, T, Gallardo, B and Guerra-Rivas, C (2016) Modifying milk and meat fat quality through feed changes. Small Ruminant Research 142, 3137.Google Scholar
Markiewicz-Kęszycka, M, Czyżak-Runowska, G, Lipińska, P and Wójtowski, J (2013) Fatty acid profile of milk – a review. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 57, 135139.Google Scholar
Maroteau, C, Palhière, I, Larroque, H, Clément, V, Ferrand, M, Tosser-Klopp, G and Rupp, R (2014) Genetic parameter estimation for major milk fatty acids in Alpine and Saanen primiparous goats. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 31423155.Google Scholar
Martini, M, Altomonte, I and Salari, F (2013) Evaluation of fatty acid profile from the core and membrane of fat globules in ewe's milk during lactation. LWT – Food Science and Technology 50, 253258.Google Scholar
Meľuchová, B, Blaško, J, Kubinec, R, Górová, R, Dubravská, J, Margetín, M and Soják, L (2008) Seasonal variations in fatty acid composition of pasture forage plants and CLA content in ewe milk fat. Small Ruminant Research 78, 5665.Google Scholar
Mierlita, D, Daraban, S and Lup, F (2011) Effects of breed on ilk fatty acid profile in dairy ewes, with particular reference to cis9, trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid. South African Journal of Animal Science 41, 223231.Google Scholar
Mihaylova, G, Jahreis, G, Odjakova, T and Kafedjev, V (2005) Fatty acid profile of milk from sheep raised on mountain pastures. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 21, 9396.Google Scholar
Milerski, M (2013) Metodika Chovu Valašské Ovce (Methodology of Wallachian Sheep Breeding) Národní Program Uchování A Využívání Genetických Zdrojů zvířat. Prague: The Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Nudda, A, Bcguire, MA, Battacone, G and Pulina, G (2005) Seasonal variation in conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid in milk fat of sheep and its transfer to cheese and ricotta. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 13111319.Google Scholar
Ostrovský, I, Pavlíková, E, Blaško, J, Górová, R, Kubinec, R, Margetín, M and Soják, L (2009) Variation in fatty acid composition of ewes' milk during continuous transition from dry winter to natural pasture diet. International Dairy Journal 19, 545549.Google Scholar
Salari, F, Altomonte, I, D'Auria, M and Martini, M (2018) Milk quality of Assaf ewes raised in Central Italy (Tuscany). Large Animal Review 24, 3740.Google Scholar
SAS (2011) SAS/STAT®9.3 User's Guide. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Signorelli, F, Contarini, G, Annicchiarico, G, Napolitano, F, Orrù, L, Catillo, G, Haenlein, GFW and Moioli, B (2008) Breed differences in sheep milk fatty acid profiles: opportunities for sustainable use of animal genetic resources. Small Ruminant Research 78, 2431.Google Scholar
Talpur, FN, Bhanger, MI and Memon, NN (2009) Milk fatty acid composition of indigenous goat and ewe breeds from Sindh, Pakistan. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 22, 5964.Google Scholar
Vasta, V, Nudda, A, Cannas, A, Lanza, M and Priolo, A (2008) Alternative feed resources and their effects on the quality of meat and milk from small ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 223246.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Influence of collection day throughout the lactation on fatty acid profile in milk fat of original Wallachian sheep (LSM ± sem)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Influence of collection day throughout the lactation on fatty acid groups according to their saturation of original Wallachian sheep. SFA = saturated fatty acids; MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acids; DAY 1 = 1st day of milk collection; DAY 2 = 2nd day of milk collection; DAY 3 = 3rd day of milk collection; DAY 4 = 4th day of milk collection; Different letters among bars within FAs groups (A, B, C, D) indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 level of significance.

Supplementary material: PDF

Ptáček et al. supplementary material

Ptáček et al. supplementary material 1

Download Ptáček et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 271.7 KB