Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T08:57:12.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of acute administration of mazindol on brain energy metabolism in adult mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2013

Cinara Ludvig Gonçalves
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Bioenergética, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Giselli Scaini
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Bioenergética, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Gislaine Tezza Rezin
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Bioenergética, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Isabela Casagrande Jeremias
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Bioenergética, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Gisele Daiane Bez
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Bioenergética, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Juliana Felipe Daufenbach
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Bioenergética, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Lara Mezari Gomes
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Bioenergética, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Gabriela Kozuchovski Ferreira
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Bioenergética, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Alexandra Ioppi Zugno
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Laboratório de Neurociências, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Emilio Luiz Streck*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Bioenergética, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
*
Prof. Emilio L. Streck, Laboratório de Bioenergética, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Av. Universitária, 1105, Criciúma, 88806-000 SC, Brazil. Tel: +55 48 3431 2539; Fax: +55 48 3431 2644; E-mail: emiliostreck@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

Mazindol is a sympathomimetic amine, widely used as an anorectic agent in the treatment of obesity. This drug causes psychostimulant effects because of its pharmacological profile similar to amphetamine, acting like a monoamine reuptake inhibitor. However, the mechanisms underlying the action of mazindol are still not clearly understood.

Methods

Swiss mice received a single acute administration of mazindol (0.25, 1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg, ip) or saline. After 2 h, the animals were killed by decapitation; the brain was removed and used for the evaluation of activities of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes, Krebs cycle enzymes and creatine kinase.

Results

Acute administration of mazindol decreased complex I activity only in the hippocampus. Complex IV activity was increased in the cerebellum (2.5 mg/kg) and cerebral cortex (0.25 mg/kg). Citrate synthase activity was increased in the cerebellum (1.25 mg/kg) and cerebral cortex (1.25 mg/kg), and creatine kinase activity was increased in the cerebellum (1.25 mg/kg).

Conclusion

We suggest that the inhibition of complex I in the hippocampus only and activation of complex IV, citrate synthase and creatine kinase occurs because of a stimulus effect of mazindol in the central nervous system, which causes a direct impairment on energy metabolism.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2013 

Significant Outcomes

  • Acute administration of mazindol affects proper functioning of the mitochondrial respiratory chain by decreasing complex I activity and increasing complex IV activity.

  • The effect of acute administration of mazindol is very diverse and depends on the dose and brain area.

Limitations

  • The effect of chronic administration of mazindol on brain energy metabolism should also be evaluated.

  • The effect of mazindol in an animal model of obesity could also be studied.

Introduction

Obesity has emerged as one of the principal health concerns throughout the world in modern age. According to the World Health Organization, there were about 1.6 billion overweight youngsters aged 15 years and at least 400 million adults were obese worldwide in 2005 (Reference Sakane1). There is a range of comorbidities associated with obesity that include diabetes mellitus type 2, cardiovascular disease, hepatic steatosis, Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease and certain cancers (Reference Haslam and James2Reference Barnes and Yaffe4). Basically, obesity results from an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure. A negative energy balance is therefore essential for the treatment of obese patients to prevent such complications. Drugs can reduce food intake, alter metabolism and/or increased energy expenditure (Reference Bray and Greenway5). Anti-obesity pharmacological treatment is indicated when body mass index (BMI) is over 30 kg/m2, or when morbidities are associated with overweight (BMI over 25 kg/m2), and dieting, physical activities and behavioural changes have been proved unsuccessful (6).

Mazindol [5-(p-chlorophenyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-imidazo(2,1-a)isoindol-5-ol] is an imidazo-isoindol derivative and chemically a non-amphetamine, tricyclic compound (Reference Gogerty and Trapold7), with anorectic action, which suppresses feeding in both humans (Reference Enzi, Baritussio, Marchiori and Crepaldi8) and animals (Reference Sapeika9) by stimulating catecholaminergic systems (Reference Samanin, Bendotti, Bernasconi, Borroni and Garattini10). Mazindol is prescribed to reduce appetite and has been reported to be effective for obesity (Reference Inoue, Egawa and Satoh11,Reference Yoshida, Sakane, Umekawa, Yoshioka, Kondo and Wakabayashi12). The consumption of mazindol has reached considerable levels in several countries. In Japan, mazindol is the only drug approved for long-term use in the treatment of obese individuals (Reference Lee, Choi and Pak13). However, the use of anti-obesity drugs to promote weight loss is widespread in the world, and obesity specialists frequently prescribe medicines in doses and for durations previously unreported in the literature. Mazindol has been developed as an anorectic drug as a short-term treatment for exogenous obesity, in combination with a diet in patients with risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes or hyperlipidemia, demonstrating safety and efficacy (Reference Defelice, Chaykin and Cohen14,Reference Aeberli, Eden and Gogerty15); however, long-term studies in obesity treatment are absent for other drugs. For example, the efficacy and safety of obesity pharmacotherapy among the elderly is unknown.

Tissues with high-energy demands, such as the brain, contain a large number of mitochondria, therefore being more susceptible to reduction of the aerobic metabolism. Mitochondria are intracellular organelles that play a crucial role in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production (Reference Calabrese, Capagnini, Giuffrida-Stella, Bates and Clark16). Most of the cell energy is obtained by mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation through a series of reactions in which electrons liberated from reducing substrates NADH and FADH are delivered to O2 via a chain of respiratory proton pumps (Reference Boekema and Braun17,Reference Brookes, Yoon, Robotham, Anders and Sheu18). Citrate synthase, malate dehydrogenase and succinate dehydrogenase are key enzymes involved in the Krebs cycle. Citrate synthase is the first step of the Krebs cycle, localised within cells in the mitochondrial matrix, and it catalyses the condensation of the oxaloacetate and acetyl groups of acetyl coenzyme-A. This enzyme has been used as a quantitative enzyme marker of mitochondria viability. Malate dehydrogenase catalyses the dehydrogenation of l-malate to oxaloacetate in the final step of Krebs cycle (Reference Kitto19). Succinate dehydrogenase is one of the most reliable markers of the mitochondrial capability to supply an adequate amount of ATP, as it is part of both the Krebs cycle and the respiratory chain (complex II) (Reference Tyler20). The mitochondrial respiratory chain is located in a special structure of the inner mitochondrial membrane. In most organisms, the mitochondrial respiratory chain is composed of four complexes. The electron transport couples with translocation of protons from the mitochondrial matrix to the intermembrane space. The generated proton gradient is used by ATP synthase to catalyse the formation of ATP by the phosphorylation of ADP (Reference Boekema and Braun17). Another form of ATP production is through creatine kinase that acts in the brain and other tissues with high and variable rates of ATP metabolism (Reference Bessman and Carpenter21Reference Wallimann, Wyss, Brdiczka, Nicolay and Eppenberger23).

Mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in a variety of diseases ranging from neurodegenerative diseases to diabetes and obesity. Obesity takes place in disorders that affect mitochondrial metabolism, which favours reactive oxygen species generation and oxidative stress (Reference Bournat and Brown24,Reference Khan, Naz and Yasmeen25). On the other hand, another mechanism has been proposed that involves an effect of high triglycerides on the functioning of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, in which intracellular triglycerides inhibit translocation of adenine nucleotides and promote the generation of superoxide (Reference Monteiro and Azevedo26,Reference Martínez27). In addition, ultrastructural abnormalities of mitochondria have been documented in fatty hepatocytes, in the absence of overt hepatic inflammation or necrosis (Reference Bruguera, Bertran, Bombi and Rodes28Reference Robertson and Kendall30). Several investigators demonstrated that fatty liver mitochondria have ultrastructural abnormalities, including swelling, intramitochondrial crystalline inclusions and distorted cristae (Reference Bruguera, Bertran, Bombi and Rodes28,Reference Petersen29). There was also some evidence for increased rates of mitochondrial O2 consumption (Reference Robertson and Kendall30,Reference Fraser and Trayhurn31).

Considering that anti-obesity drugs may modulate energy metabolism and that effects of mazindol on energy metabolism are still not clearly understood. In the present study, we evaluated the activities of enzymes of Krebs cycle, mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes and creatine kinase in the brain of adult mice subjected to acute administration of mazindol.

Materials and methods

Animals

A total of 24 adult male Swiss mice (90 days old) weighing 40–45 g were obtained from Central Animal House of the Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense. They were caged in groups of five with free access to food and water and were maintained on a 12-h light–dark cycle (lights on 07:00 a.m.), at a temperature of 23 ± 1°C. All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Brazilian Society for Neuroscience and Behavior recommendations for animal care, with the approval of the Ethics Committee from Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense.

Drugs

Animals received a single acute administration of mazindol (commercial name Fagolipo®, LIBBS) dissolved in 0.9% saline (w/v) (0.25, 1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg). All the doses of mazindol were administered at a volume not exceeding 1 ml/100 g body weight of mice. Control mice received an equivalent volume of saline. The selection of this regimen was based on previous studies showing important neurochemical and anorectic effects for this drug (Reference Wellman32). Two hours after the injection, mice were killed by decapitation, the brain was removed and the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum and striatum were isolated and homogenised. The activities of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes (complex I, II, II–III, IV), citrate synthase, succinate dehydrogenase, malate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase were measured.

Tissue and homogenate preparation

Two hours after the injection, the mice were killed by decapitation, the brain was removed and the hippocampus, striatum, cerebellum and cerebral cortex were homogenised (1:10, w/v) in SETH buffer, pH 7.4 (250 mM sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM Trizma base, 50 IU/ml heparin). The homogenates were centrifuged at 800 × g for 10 min and the supernatants kept at –70°C until used for enzyme activity determination. The maximum period between homogenate preparation and enzyme analysis was always <5 days. Protein content was determined by the method described by Lowry et al. (Reference Lowry, Rosebough, Farr and Randall33) using bovine serum albumin as standard.

Activities of Krebs cycle enzymes

Citrate synthase activity: citrate synthase activity was assayed according to the method described by Srere (Reference Srere34). The reaction mixture contained 100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100 mM acetyl CoA, 100 mM 5,5′-di-thiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid), 0.1% triton X-100, and 2–4 μg supernatant protein and it was initiated with 100 μM oxaloacetate and monitored at 412 nm for 3 min at 25°C.

Malate dehydrogenase activity: malate dehydrogenase was measured as described by Kitto (Reference Kitto19). Aliquots (20 μg protein) were transferred into a medium containing 10 mM rotenone, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.15 mM NADH and 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The reaction was started by addition of 0.33 mM oxaloacetate and absorbance was monitored at 340 nm for 5 min at 37°C.

Succinate dehydrogenase activity: succinate dehydrogenase activity was determined according to the method of Fischer et al. (Reference Fischer, Ruitenbeek and Berden35), measured by following the decrease in absorbance owing to reduction of 2,6-di-chloro-indophenol (2,6-DCIP) at 600 nm with 700 nm as reference wavelength (ε = 19.1 mM–1cm–1) in the presence of phenazine methosulphate (PMS). The reaction mixture consisting of 40 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, 16 mM succinate and 8 μM 2,6-DCIP was pre-incubated with 40–80 μg homogenate protein at 30°C for 20 min. Subsequently, 4 mM sodium azide, 7 μM rotenone and 40 μM 2,6-DCIP were added and the reaction was initiated by addition of 1 mM PMS and was monitored for 5 min.

Activities of mitochondrial respiratory chain enzymes

NADH dehydrogenase (complex I) was evaluated according to the method described by Cassina and Radi (Reference Cassina and Radi36) by the rate of NADH-dependent ferricyanide reduction at 420 nm. The activities of succinate: DCIP oxidoreductase (complex II) and succinate: cytochrome c oxidoreductase (complex II–III) were determined according to the method of Fischer et al. (Reference Fischer, Ruitenbeek and Berden35). Complex II activity was measured by following the decrease in absorbance owing to the reduction of 2,6-DCIP at 600 nm. Complex III activity was measured by cytochrome c reduction from succinate. The activity of cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) was assayed according to the method described by Rustin et al. (Reference Rustin, Chretien and Bourgeron37), measured by following the decrease in absorbance owing to the oxidation of previously reduced cytochrome c at 550 nm. The activities of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes were expressed as nmol/min/mg/protein.

Creatine kinase activity

Creatine kinase activity was measured in brain homogenates pretreated with 0.625 mM lauryl maltoside. The reaction mixture consisted of 60 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, containing 7 mM phosphocreatine, 9 mM MgSO4 and ∼0.4–1.2 μg protein in a final volume of 100 μl. After 15 min of pre-incubation at 37°C, the reaction was started by the addition of 3.2 mmol of ADP plus 0.8 mmol of reduced glutathione. The reaction was stopped after 10 min by the addition of 1 μmol of p-hydroxymercuribenzoic acid. The creatine formed was estimated according to the colorimetric method of Hughes (Reference Hughes38). The colour was developed by the addition of 100 μl 2% α-naphthol and 100 μl 0.05% diacetyl in a final volume of 1 ml and read spectrophotometrically after 20 min at 540 nm. Results were expressed as units/min × mg protein.

Statistical analysis

These data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All of the assays of biochemical analysis were performed in duplicate, and the mean was used for statistical analysis. Because the variables being analysed did not follow a normal distribution and its variance does not fulfil the assumption of homoscedasticity, they were analysed by a non-parametric test (Kruskal–Wallis test). The differences within the individual groups were analysed by Tukey's HSD post-hoc tests. The differences between the groups were considered significant at p < 0.05. All of the analyses were carried out on an IBM-compatible PC computer using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (Armonk, New York, USA).

Results

In the present study, we investigated the effect of acute administration of mazindol on the activities of several enzymes involved in energy metabolism in homogenates from the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex from the brain of mice. Our results showed that mazindol decreased complex I activity (Fig. 1a) in the hippocampus at all doses investigated: 0.25 mg/kg (p = 0.034); 1.25 mg/kg (p = 0.014) and 2.5 mg/kg (p = 0.011); the cerebellum, striatum and cerebral cortex were not affected. On the other hand, there was an increase in complex IV activity (Fig. 1d) in the cerebellum (2.5 mg/kg; p = 0.010) and cerebral cortex (0.25 mg/kg; p = 0.016). However, complexes II (Fig. 1b) and II–III activities (Fig. 1c) were not affected by mazindol. Furthermore, citrate synthase activity was increased in the cerebellum (1.25 mg/kg; p = 0.005) and cerebral cortex (1.25 mg/kg, p = 0.004; Fig. 2). A similar effect occurred in creatine kinase activity, which was increased only in the cerebellum (1.25 mg/kg, p = 0.004; Fig. 3). On the other hand, the acute administration of mazindol did not affect malate dehydrogenase (Fig. 4) and succinate dehydrogenase activities (Fig. 5).

Fig. 1 Complex I activity (a), complex II activity (b), complex II–III activity (c) and complex IV activity (d) after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Tukey).

Fig. 2 Citrate synthase activity after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Tukey).

Fig. 3 Creatine kinase activity after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis Test followed by Tukey).

Fig. 4 Malate dehydrogenase activity after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Tukey).

Fig. 5 Succinate dehydrogenase activity after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ±S.D. (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Tukey).

Discussion

Obesity results from a prolonged imbalance of small positive energy and treatment is required to reverse this imbalance (Reference Sakane1). The combination of mazindol – a sympathomimetic amine clinically used in the treatment of obesity – and diet therapy is effective in treating severe obesity (Reference Yoshida, Sakane, Umekawa, Yoshioka, Kondo and Wakabayashi12,Reference Inoue39,Reference Nishikawa, Iizuka and Omura40). It possesses both an anti-obesity action because of inhibition of appetite and brown adipose tissue thermogenesis activation (Reference Yoshida, Umekawa, Wakabayashi, Yoshimoto, Sakane and Kondo41).

The CNS requires a high-energy supply because of its intense ATP-consuming processes. In this context, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is the main ATP-producing pathway, which supplies more than 95% of the total energy requirement in the cells (Reference Boekema and Braun17). The appropriate functioning of Krebs cycle enzymes as well as the integrity and function of respiratory chain complexes provide the major source of energy in biological systems. Our outcomes showed relevant alterations on the activity of enzymatic complexes of mitochondrial respiratory chain. Interestingly, mazindol promoted an inhibition action only in complex I of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, specifically in the hippocampus. Complex I is the first enzyme complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, oxidising NADH to release electrons that facilitate the translocation of protons across the inner membrane and then to promote generation of a proton gradient. It is known that the decrease in the activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain causes an increase in the generation of reactive oxygen species. It is known that the decrease in the activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain causes an increase in the generation of reactive oxygen species, mainly by complex I, because this is very sensitive and can be inhibited by reactive oxygen species (Reference Navarro and Boveris43,Reference Bailey, Landar and Darley-Usmar44). In fact, a number of devastating neurodegenerative disorders are associated with complex I deficiency, resulting in a decline in energy production by the respiratory chain and in increased production of reactive oxygen species (Reference Bailey, Landar and Darley-Usmar44,Reference Dimauro and Hirano45). The decreased activity of complex I is determined in mitochondrial fragments as a decreased NADH-cytochrome c reductase activity with a simultaneously unchanged succinate-cytochrome c reductase activity (Reference Navarro and Boveris43) or as decreased NADH-ubiquinone reductase activity (Reference Lenaz, Bovina and Castelluccio46), and in coupled mitochondria as a decreased respiratory rate in state 3 with malate-glutamate, or other NAD-dependent substrates with a simultaneous unchanged respiratory rate with succinate as substrate (Reference Navarro and Boveris43).

Mazindol is essentially a dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor (Reference Javitch, Blaustein and Snyder47) that produces an increase in a resting metabolic rate (Reference Wyllie, Fletcher, Rothwell and Stock48). This drug interacts with the DA uptake sites with a Ki value in the 10−7 M range (49), and because of that characteristic mazindol induces a marked labelling of noradrenaline uptake complex. The metabolism of catecholamines, such as DA and NE, is probably associated with free radical formation, and conditions associated with increased catecholamine metabolism may increase the free radical burden. Studies have shown that endogenously available DA can undergo autoxidation and form reactive quinones that attack and potentially inhibit the function of intracellular proteins. In addition to DA, autoxidation and metabolism of DA by monoamine oxidase can increase H2O2 production and iron-dependent reactive oxygen species production (Reference Jana, Sinha and Chanda50). In this context, we suggest that inhibition in the hippocampus can be a consequence of increased DA synthesis.

Tissues, such as the brain, and specific brain areas, such as the hippocampus, which have a slow turnover of mitochondria and mitochondrial components, show a cellular accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria with increased apoptosis, a condition that drives the tissue to a physiological deficit (Reference Gould and Mcewen51). This host reaction determines the unfavourable outcome of the disease with neuronal injury including hippocampal apoptosis (Reference Grandgirard, Steiner, Täuber and Leib52). This may explain why some brain areas, especially the hippocampus, are more affected than other.

Moreover, complex I is the primary source of reactive oxygen species in a variety of pathological processes (Reference Gassner, Wuthrich, Scholtysik and Solioz53Reference Sherer, Betarbet, Kim and Greenamyre55). The decrease in complex I activity of the mitochondrial respiratory chain in this area compromises the use of reduced coenzyme NADH. As our results showed that complex II and succinate dehydrogenase activities are functioning properly, the pathway that is probably sustaining the respiratory chain is through FADH-complex II. Therefore, it seems justifiable to confirm the greater susceptibility of the hippocampus to drugs, in this case mazindol, and a greater susceptibility on memory and learning impairments.

Burrows et al. (Reference Burrows, Gudelsky and Yamamoto56) conclude that the acute dose of psychostimulant administration produces a rapid and transient disruption of metabolic processes that is regionally selective. Psychostimulants may increase neuronal energy utilisation through the sustained activation of monoamine transporters (Reference Rothwell N, Stock and Wyllie57). A recent study by Rezin et al. (Reference Rezin, Jeremias and Ferreira58) showed that the activities of citrate synthase, malate dehydrogenase, succinate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase and complexes of respiratory chain were increased by acute and chronic administration of fenproporex – an anorectic drug that is converted in vivo into amphetamine.

The majority of ATP in the neuropil is devoted to the maintenance of ion gradients and the restoration of the membrane potential following depolarisation (Reference Wong-Riley59Reference Hevner, Duff and Wong-Riley61), and sustained activation following prolonged neurotransmitter release may lead indirectly to the depletion of substrates for the electron transport chain (Reference Sugrue, Shaw and Charlton62). The NE decrease neuronal reuptake promoted by mazindol had variable effects. Rothwell et al. (Reference Rothwell N, Stock and Wyllie57) showed a slight delayed increase in Na+, K+-ATPase activity, which was also not sustained. It is important to bear in mind that mazindol has a very slow onset of action, which might be because of a slow build-up of NE at the synapse (Reference Sugrue, Shaw and Charlton62). This can be related to our results, where the increase seen on the enzymatic activity of complex IV mitochondrial respiratory chain, citrate synthase and creatine kinase is possibly a primary response after acute exposition to a drug with psychostimulant properties, such as mazindol.

It is important to remind that complex IV is the terminal enzyme of electron transport chain that transfers electrons from cytochrome c to oxygen while it translocates protons from the matrix into the intermembrane space. Effects on complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase), however, are the most severe because this is the step where oxygen is reduced to water (Reference Cassina and Radi36). Interestingly, only the cerebral cortex was affected at the lowest dose (0.25 mg/kg) with an increase in complex IV activity. Rothwell et al. (Reference Rezin, Jeremias and Ferreira58) showed in a study that mazindol had effects at low concentrations. Low and clinically relevant doses of stimulants exert behavioural actions that are qualitatively different from higher and behaviourally activating doses. Together these data suggest that energy metabolism impairment may occur by mazindol pharmacotherapy. In this context, several studies link energy impairment to neuronal death and neurodegeneration (Reference Moreira, Santos and Oliveira63,Reference Moreira, Santos, Seiça and Oliveira64). The high density of the mitochondria within the neurons could provide a rationale for the sensitivity of the CNS to energy deficit because of mitochondrial dysfunction. As several studies have shown that stimulant effect increases the extracellular concentrations of monoamines, this class of drugs may also contribute to mitochondrial inhibition (Reference Burrows, Gudelsky and Yamamoto56,Reference Graham, Tiffany, Bell and Gutknecht65,Reference Mclaughlin, Nelson, Erecinska and Chesselet66). On the other hand, the stimulus effect of mazindol in most of the assays analysed promotes prolonged modulating action of NE and DA, and therefore there is a greater energy demand. In addition, we demonstrated that these changes varied according to the brain structure or biochemical analysis and were not dose dependent.

It is worth mentioning that some aspects of drug–mitochondria interactions may still be underestimated because of the difficulty in foreseeing and understanding all potential implications of the complex pathophysiology of mitochondria. More studies are necessary to confirm the selective action of mazindol on CNS and its dual effect on the mitochondrial respiratory chain, where there was a significant inhibition in the activity of complex I and an activation in complex IV – if these results are repeated on a chronic treatment and as far as the complex I inhibition and complex IV activation undertakes brain metabolism.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde – Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC), Núcleo de Excelência em Neurociências Aplicadas de Santa Catarina (NENASC) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (PRONEX—FAPESC/CNPq) and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT).

Author Contribution

Gonçalves CL, Rezin GT, Scaini G and Streck EL designed the experiments; Rezin GT, Ferreira GK, Bez GD, Daufenbach JF and Gomes LM conducted the experiments; Rezin GT and Jeremias IC analysed the data; Gonçalves CL, Zugno AI and Streck EL wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

1.Sakane, N. Pharmacology in health foods: merits and demerits of food with health claims for the prevention of metabolic syndrome. J Pharmacol Sci 2011;115:476480.Google Scholar
2.Haslam, W, James, WP. Obesity. Lancet 2005;366:11971209.Google Scholar
3.Brunt, EM. Pathology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;7:195203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Barnes, DE, Yaffe, K. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer's disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:819828.Google Scholar
5.Bray, GA, Greenway, FL. Current and potential drugs for treatment of obesity (review). Endocr Rev 1999;20:805875.Google Scholar
6.World Health Organization (WHO). Consultation on obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1998.Google Scholar
7.Gogerty, J, Trapold, J. Chemistry and pharmacology of mazindol. Triangle 1976;15:2536.Google Scholar
8.Enzi, G, Baritussio, A, Marchiori, E, Crepaldi, G. Short-term and long-term clinical evaluation of a non-amphetaminic anorexiant (mazindol) in the treatment of obesity. J Int Med Res 1976;4:305319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Sapeika, N. Drugs in obesity. S Afr Med J 1974;48:20272030.Google Scholar
10.Samanin, R, Bendotti, C, Bernasconi, S, Borroni, E, Garattini, S. Role of brain monoamines in the anorectic activity of mazindol and d-amphetamine in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 1977;43:117124.Google Scholar
11.Inoue, S, Egawa, M, Satoh, Set al. Clinical and basic aspects of an anorexiant, mazindol, as antiobesity agent in Japan. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:199202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Yoshida, T, Sakane, N, Umekawa, T, Yoshioka, K, Kondo, M, Wakabayashi, Y. Usefulness of mazindol in combined diet therapy consisting of a low-calorie diet and Optifast in severely obese women. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res 1994;14:125132.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Lee, HK, Choi, EB, Pak, CS. The current status and future perspectives of studies of cannabinoid receptor 1 antagonists as antiobesity agents. Curr Top Med Chem 2009;9:482503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Defelice, EA, Chaykin, LB, Cohen, A. Double-blind clinical evaluation of mazindol, dextroamphetamine, and placebo in treatment of exogenous obesity. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1973;15:358366.Google Scholar
15.Aeberli, P, Eden, P, Gogerty, JHet al. 5-Aryl-2,3-dihydro-5H-imidazo [2,1-a]isoindol-5-ols. A novel class of anorectic agents. J Med Chem 1975;18:177182.Google Scholar
16.Calabrese, V, Capagnini, G, Giuffrida-Stella, AM, Bates, TE, Clark, JB. Mitochondrial involvement in brain function and dysfunction: relevance to aging, neurodegenerative disorders and longevity. Neurochem Res 2001;26:739764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Boekema, EJ, Braun, HP. Supramolecular structure of the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system. J Biol Chem 2007;282:14.Google Scholar
18.Brookes, PS, Yoon, Y, Robotham, JL, Anders, MW, Sheu, SS. Calcium, ATP, and ROS: a mitochondrial love–hate triangle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2004;287:817833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kitto, GB. Intra- and extramitochondrial malate dehydrogenases from chicken and tuna heart. Methods Enzymol 1969;13:106116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Tyler, D. The mitochondrion in health and diseases. VCH Publishers, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
21.Bessman, SP, Carpenter, CL. The creatine–creatine phosphate energy shuttle. Annu Rev Biochem 1985;54:831865.Google Scholar
22.Schnyder, T, Winkler, H, Gross, H, Eppenberger, HM, Wallimann, T. Crystallization of mitochondrial creatine kinase. Growing of large protein crystals and electron microscopic investigation of microcrystals consisting of octamers. J Biol Chem 1991;266:53185322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Wallimann, T, Wyss, M, Brdiczka, D, Nicolay, K, Eppenberger, HM. Intracellular compartmentation, structure and function of creatine kinase isoenzymes in tissues with high and fluctuating energy demands: the ‘phosphocreatine circuit’ for cellular energy homeostasis. Biochem J 1992;281:2140.Google Scholar
24.Bournat, JC, Brown, CW. Mitochondrial dysfunction in obesity. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2010;17:446452.Google Scholar
25.Khan, N, Naz, L, Yasmeen, G. Obesity: an independent risk factor systemic oxidative stress. Pak J Pharm Sci 2006;19:6269.Google Scholar
26.Monteiro, R, Azevedo, I. Chronic inflammation in obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Mediators Inflamm 2010:289645.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Martínez, J. Mitochondrial oxidative stress and inflammation: an slalom to obesity and insulin resistance. J Physiol Biochem 2006;62:303306.Google Scholar
28.Bruguera, M, Bertran, A, Bombi, JA, Rodes, J. Giant mitochondria in hepatocytes: a diagnostic hint for alcoholic liver disease. Gastroenterology 1977;73:13831387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Petersen, P. Ultrastructure of periportal and centrilobular hepatocytes in human fatty liver of various aetiology. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1977;85:421427.Google Scholar
30.Robertson, NJ, Kendall, CH. Liver giant mitochondria revisited. J Clin Pathol 1992;45:412415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Fraser, DR, Trayhurn, P. Mitochondrial Ca2+ transport in lean and genetically obese (ob/ob) mice. Biochem J 1983;214:163170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Wellman, PJ. Systemic mazindol reduces food intake in rats via suppression of meal size and meal number. J Psychopharmacol 2008;22:532535.Google Scholar
33.Lowry, OH, Rosebough, NG, Farr, AL, Randall, RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193:265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Srere, PA. Citrate synthase. Methods Enzymol 1969;13:311.Google Scholar
35.Fischer, JC, Ruitenbeek, W, Berden, JAet al. Differential investigation of the capacity of succinate oxidation in human skeletal muscle. Clin Chim Acta 1985;153:2326.Google Scholar
36.Cassina, A, Radi, R. Differential inhibitory action of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite on mitochondrial electron transport. Arch Biochem Biophys 1996;328:309316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Rustin, P, Chretien, D, Bourgeron, Tet al. Biochemical and molecular investigations in respiratory chain deficiencies. Clin Chim Acta 1994;228:3551.Google Scholar
38.Hughes, BP. A method for estimation of serum creatine kinase and its use in comparing creatine kinase and aldolase activity in normal and pathologic sera. Clin Chim Acta 1962;7:597604.Google Scholar
39.Inoue, S. Clinical studies with mazindol. Obes Res 1995;4:549S552S.Google Scholar
40.Nishikawa, T, Iizuka, T, Omura, Met al. Effect of mazindol on body weight and insulin sensitivity in severely obese patients after a very-low-calorie diet therapy. Endocrine J 1996;43:671677.Google Scholar
41.Yoshida, T, Umekawa, T, Wakabayashi, Y, Yoshimoto, K, Sakane, N, Kondo, M. Anti-obesity and anti-diabetic effects of mazindol in yellow KK mice: its activating effect on brown adipose tissue thermogenesis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1996;23:476482.Google Scholar
42.Adam-Vizi, V. Production of reactive oxygen species in brain mitochondria: contribution by electron transport chain and non-electron transport chain sources. Antioxid Redox Signal 2005;7:11401149.Google Scholar
43.Navarro, A, Boveris, A. The mitochondrial energy transduction system and the aging process. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2007;292:670686.Google Scholar
44.Bailey, SM, Landar, A, Darley-Usmar, V. Mitochondrial proteomics in free radical research. Free Radic Biol Med 2005;38:175188.Google Scholar
45.Dimauro, S, Hirano, M. Mitochondrial encephalomyopathies: an update. Neuromuscul Disord 2005;15:276286.Google Scholar
46.Lenaz, G, Bovina, C, Castelluccio, Cet al. Mitochondrial complex I defects in aging. Mol Cell Biochem 1997;174:329333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Javitch, JA, Blaustein, RO, Snyder, SH. [3H]mazindol binding associated with neuronal dopamine and norepinephrine uptake sites. Mol Pharmacol 1984;26:3544.Google Scholar
48.Wyllie, MG, Fletcher, A, Rothwell, NJ, Stock, MJ. Thermogenic properties of ciclazindol and mazindol in rodents. Int J Obes 1984;1:8592.Google Scholar
49.Bonnet, JJ, Benmansour, S, Costentin, J, Parker, EM, Cubeddu, LX. Thermodynamic analyses of the binding of substrates and uptake inhibitors on the neuronal carder of dopamine labeled with [3H]GBR 12783 or [3H]mazindol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1990;253:12061214.Google Scholar
50.Jana, S, Sinha, M, Chanda, Det al. Mitochondrial dysfunction mediated by quinone oxidation products of dopamine: implications in dopamine cytotoxicity and pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1812:663673.Google Scholar
51.Gould, E, Mcewen, BS. Neuronal birth and death. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1993;3:676682.Google Scholar
52.Grandgirard, D, Steiner, O, Täuber, MG, Leib, SB. An infant mouse model of brain damage in pneumococcal meningitis. Acta Neuropathol 2007;114:609617.Google Scholar
53.Gassner, B, Wuthrich, A, Scholtysik, G, Solioz, M. The pyrethroids permethrin and cyhalothrin are potent inhibitors of the mitochondrial complex I. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;281:855860.Google Scholar
54.Barja, G, Herrero, A. Localization at complex I and mechanism of the higher free radical production of brain nonsynaptic mitochondria in the short-lived rat than in the longevous pigeon. J Bioenerg Biomembr 1998;30:235243.Google Scholar
55.Sherer, TB, Betarbet, R, Kim, JH, Greenamyre, JT. Subcutaneous rotenone exposure causes highly selective dopaminergic degeneration and alpha-synuclein aggregation. Exp Neurol 2003;179:916.Google Scholar
56.Burrows, KB, Gudelsky, G, Yamamoto, BK. Rapid and transient inhibition of mitochondrial function following methamphetamine or 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine administration. Eur J Pharmacol 2000;398:1118.Google Scholar
57.Rothwell N, J, Stock, MJ, Wyllie, MG. Sympathetic mechanisms in diet-induced thermogenesis: modification by ciclazindol and anorectic drugs. Br J Pharmacol 1981;74:539546.Google Scholar
58.Rezin, GT, Jeremias, IC, Ferreira, GKet al. Brain energy metabolism is activated after acute and chronic administration of fenproporex in young rats. Int J Dev Neurosci 2011;29:937942.Google Scholar
59.Wong-Riley, M. Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry. Brain Res 1979;171:1128.Google Scholar
60.Erecinska, M, Silver, I. ATP and brain function. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1989;9:219.Google Scholar
61.Hevner, R, Duff, R, Wong-Riley, M. Coordination of ATP production and consumption in brain: parallel regulation of cytochrome oxidase and Na+, K+-ATPase. Neurosci Lett 1992;138:188192.Google Scholar
62.Sugrue, MF, Shaw, G, Charlton, KG. Some effects of mazindol, an anorectic drug, on rat brain monoaminergic systems. Eur J Pharmacol 1977;42:319385.Google Scholar
63.Moreira, PI, Santos, MS, Oliveira, CR. Alzheimer's disease: a lesson from mitochondrial dysfunction. Antioxid Redox Signal 2007;9:16211630.Google Scholar
64.Moreira, PI, Santos, MS, Seiça, R, Oliveira, CR. Brain mitochondrial dysfunction as a link between Alzheimer's disease and diabetes. J Neurol Sci 2007;257:206214.Google Scholar
65.Graham, DG, Tiffany, SM, Bell, WB, Gutknecht, WF. Autoxidation versus covalent binding of quinones as the mechanism of toxicity of dopamine, 6-hydroxy dopamine, and related compounds toward C1300 neuroblastoma cells in vitro. Mol Pharmacol 1978;14:644653.Google Scholar
66.Mclaughlin, BA, Nelson, D, Erecinska, M, Chesselet, MF. Toxicity of dopamine to striatal neurons in vitro and potentiation of cell death by a mitochondrial inhibitor. J Neurochem 1998;70:24062415.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Complex I activity (a), complex II activity (b), complex II–III activity (c) and complex IV activity (d) after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Tukey).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Citrate synthase activity after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Tukey).

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Creatine kinase activity after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis Test followed by Tukey).

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Malate dehydrogenase activity after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Tukey).

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Succinate dehydrogenase activity after acute administration of mazindol in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and cerebral cortex of mice. Values are expressed as mean ±S.D. (n = 6). Different from control; *p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Tukey).