Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T01:32:07.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Termite diversity and abundance across fire-induced habitat variability in a tropical moist savanna (Lamto, Central Côte d'Ivoire)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2010

Kanvaly Dosso*
Affiliation:
Station d'écologie de Lamto, UFR des Sciences de la Nature, Université d'Abobo-Adjamé (Abidjan), Côte d'Ivoire
Souleymane Konaté
Affiliation:
Station d'écologie de Lamto, UFR des Sciences de la Nature, Université d'Abobo-Adjamé (Abidjan), Côte d'Ivoire
Daouda Aidara
Affiliation:
Station d'écologie de Lamto, UFR des Sciences de la Nature, Université d'Abobo-Adjamé (Abidjan), Côte d'Ivoire
K. E. Linsenmair
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg, Germany
*
1Corresponding address: BP 28 N'Douci, Côte d'Ivoire. Email: doskan2002@yahoo.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

At Lamto, little is known about animal community responses to habitat variability resulting from fires and the mosaic pattern of the vegetation in general and in particular about that of termites which play key roles in this ecosystem. With a standardized method, data were collected on termites from four habitats differing in their vegetation cover and fire-history: annually burned savanna, savanna woodland, forest island and gallery forest. A range of environmental variables was measured and correlated with species abundances. The number of termite species collected in the savanna woodland was very close to that found in the gallery forest while the forest island was the richest habitat. The species richness of the savanna woodland and forest island seemed partly due to their heterogeneous and transitional vegetation structures and variable food resources. With regard to the fire-history of habitats, Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis offers an explanation for differences in the patterns of habitat-specific species richness. Variation in species abundances was significantly correlated with only two environmental variables (soil pH and woody plant species richness). The pH appeared as the most influential factor for fungus-growers while tree invasion in the savanna strongly reduces the abundance of grass-feeding species (e.g. Trinervitermes geminatus). Although not significantly correlated with species abundances, soil carbon showed a positive correlation with the dominant soil-feeder Basidentitermes potens. As for wood-feeders, they were not strongly correlated with woody plant species richness; this fact might be linked to their use for other sources of nourishment. Overall, it appears that habitat variability in the Lamto reserve contributes to the maintenance of different subsets of the termite community.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

INTRODUCTION

One of the conspicuous features of the savanna landscape at Lamto in central Côte d'Ivoire is its spatial heterogeneity. The vegetation is composed of evergreen (gallery forest) and semi-deciduous forests (forest islands) embedded in the savanna which itself is composed of several subtypes differing in the densities of shrubs and trees (Ménaut & Abbadie Reference MÉNAUT, ABBADIE, Abbadie, Gignoux, Le Roux and Lepage2006). The savanna subtypes are differently impacted in the structure of their vegetation by annual fires causing high habitat variability (Gignoux Reference GIGNOUX1994, Ménaut Reference MÉNAUT1971, Monnier Reference MONNIER1968, Mordelet Reference MORDELET1993). Such habitat heterogeneity may influence the diversity and spatial dynamics of the savanna-dwelling communities (Gillison et al. Reference GILLISON, JONES, SUSILO and BIGNELL2003). As one of the main concerns for comprehending the ecology of animals consists in understanding the relationships between community dynamics and landscape structure (Boulinier et al. Reference BOULINIER, NICHOLS, SAUER, HINE and POLLOCK1998), it is necessary to study community responses to habitat variability (Ramankutty & Foley Reference RAMANKUTTY and FOLEY1999). Since fires are of special importance for the structure and dynamics of savannas, quite a number of studies have been undertaken to elucidate their effects on these ecosystems (Bond Reference BOND, Cowling, Richardson and Pierce1997, Sankaran et al. Reference SANKARAN, HANAN, ACHOLES, RATNAM, AUGUSTINE, CADE, GIGNOUX, HIGGINS, LE ROUX, LUDWIG, ARDO, BANYIKWA, BROON, BUCINNI, CAYLOR, COUGHENOUR, DIOUF, EKAYA, FERAL, FEBRUARY, FROST, HIERNAUX, HRABAR, METZGER, PRINS, RINGROSE, SEA, TEWS, WORDEN and ZAMBATIS2005, Reference SANKARAN, RATNAM and HANAN2008; Tainton & Mentis Reference TAINTON, MENTIS, Booysen and Tainton1984, Trollope et al. Reference TROLLOPE, TROLLOPE, BIGGS, PIENAAR and POTGIETER1998). However, we still lack much important information on several aspects of fire impact on savanna ecosystems (Parr & Chown Reference PARR and CHOWN2003, Trollope Reference TROLLOPE, de V. Booysen and Tainton1984).

At Lamto, although fire is the most important and frequently employed management tool for the maintenance of the savannas, very little is known about the consequences of the fire-induced habitat variability on the faunal diversity in general and that of termites in particular. Termites, as true ecosystem engineers (cf. Jones et al. Reference JONES, LAWTON and SHACHAK1994), play key roles in the dynamics of this savanna landscape (Konaté Reference KONATÉ1998, Le Roux et al. Reference LE ROUX, GIGNOUX, SIMIONI, Abbadie, Gignoux, Le Roux and Lepage2006). Among others, these roles concern soil bioturbation and formation, modification of soil texture and nutrient content (Holt & Lepage Reference HOLT, LEPAGE, Abe, Bignell and Higashi2000, Konaté et al. Reference KONATÉ, LE ROUX, TESSIER and LEPAGE1999, Lee & Wood Reference LEE and WOOD1971), decomposition of plant material (Josens Reference JOSENS and Bourlière1983, Wood & Sands Reference WOOD, SANDS and Brian1978) and emission of carbon dioxide (and also methane) (Konaté et al. Reference KONATÉ, LE ROUX, VERDIER and LEPAGE2003). Additionally, they represent good bio-indicators in tropical ecosystems with regard to their sensitivity to habitat disturbance causing changes in their species richness, composition and functional characteristics (Davies Reference DAVIES1997, Eggleton et al. Reference EGGLETON, BIGNELL, HAUSER, DIBOG, NORGROVE and MADONG2002, Konaté et al. Reference KONATÉ, YEO, YOBOUET, ALONSO, KOUASSI, Alonso, Lauginie and Rondeau2005). With regard to these important ecological functions of termites, understanding their responses to the spatial structure of habitats is essential in view of the functioning of the Lamto protected area.

In this study, we investigated two hypotheses: (1) termite guilds respond variously to habitat variability maintained by regular fires at Lamto. Due to their specific ecological and biological characteristics, each species is expected to respond in its own way to changes in habitat structure; (2) much of the variation in species abundances is explicable in terms of environmental variables decisive for the establishment and success of termite colonies. To examine these hypotheses, we collected data on termite diversity and abundance from four habitat types differing in their vegetation cover and fire-history, and we also measured some environmental variables in order to correlate them with relative abundances of the different species.

METHODS

Study area

The study was carried out in the Lamto reserve (6°13ʹN, 5°02ʹW) representing a typical Guinean (i.e. humid) savanna in central Côte d'Ivoire. In this area, fire has been held responsible for the unexpected presence of savannas where climate should be able to sustain rain forests (Monnier Reference MONNIER1968). The ample water availability supports the development of a rich vegetation which becomes, with drying up, a copious fuel source for the fires. As a result, these fires are relatively severe and occur every year (usually mid-January). They exert a stabilizing effect on the habitat mosaic by preventing massive tree invasion into the savanna, thereby hindering the re-establishment of forests and freezing the forest–savanna boundary in a historical position (Gillon Reference GILLON and Bourlière1983). Although these fires have a strong negative effect on newly recruited woody plants, the regular human-lit fires at Lamto cannot entirely prevent woody plant invasions because they are, as mid-dry-season fires, not hot enough and not covering the whole area to kill all tree and shrub species before they are tall enough to resist fires (Abbadie et al. Reference ABBADIE, GIGNOUX, LE ROUX and LEPAGE2006). This moist savanna possesses for most of the year a dense and high grass layer where scattered trees and bushes vary considerably in their abundance, leading to a high spatial heterogeneity (Figure 1). The annual precipitation attains 1200 mm and the dry season lasts less than 2 mo (Ménaut Reference MÉNAUT and Boulière1983). A long rainy season occurs from February to November and is usually interrupted by a short dry season in August; this is followed by a longer dry season in December and January. The analysis of climatic features over the two previous decades indicates that the precipitation range is 1000–1500 mm y−1 and the mean annual temperature is stable (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Map of the Lamto reserve showing habitat variability (modified from Gautier Reference GAUTIER1990). Transects are numbered from 1 to 5. Habitat abbreviations: ABS, annually burned savanna; SW, savanna woodland; FI, forest island and GF, gallery forest.

Figure 2. Total annual precipitation and mean annual temperature at Lamto over the two decades before the study (1986–2005) (data source: Station of Geophysics of Lamto).

The habitats studied were chosen according to vegetation type and fire-history, each of them having its own characteristics. In the annually burned savanna, the tree cover ranges between 7% and 36% (Gautier Reference GAUTIER1990). This fuel-rich habitat is burned deliberately every year apart from the plots set and followed up for experiments on fire exclusion. This savanna type covers the lower part of slopes and the hydromorphic plateaux (Ménaut & Abbadie Reference MÉNAUT, ABBADIE, Abbadie, Gignoux, Le Roux and Lepage2006). The savanna woodlands studied consisted of savanna patches randomly unburned for 5 y and strongly subjected to tree invasion (Vuattoux Reference VUATTOUX1970, Reference VUATTOUX1976). With a tree cover of 60%, the vegetation was a mixture of grass, tree and shrub layers (Gautier Reference GAUTIER1990). This savanna type appears mostly on slopes (Ménaut & César Reference MÉNAUT and CESAR1979). The impact of fire depends on the strength of the seasonal drought and mainly on the amount of fuel produced since the last fire event. The forest islands were semi-deciduous forests entirely surrounded by savannas. As these forests were not dense, their canopy was discontinuous. They possessed partly transitional vegetation comprising both forest and savanna tree species. This forest type is not impacted by fire in the interior because the grass stratum is lacking, replaced by a thin layer of leaf-litter which does not offer enough fuel to allow the fire to invade deeply inside. Only, the periphery is impacted. The gallery forest is located along the permanent Bandama River. This evergreen forest has a fully closed canopy and open undergrowth with abundant leaf litter. With regard to the physical structure, its vegetation is homogeneous and composed of only forest tree species. Although this habitat is partly in contact with the savanna, it is the best protected against fire and much more humid than the forest island.

Sampling design

Termites were sampled using a standardized method designed for rapid assessment of termite diversity by Jones & Eggleton (Reference JONES and EGGLETON2000). Five separate blocks of each habitat type were sampled by delimiting at random one transect 100 m long and 2 m wide through each block. As transects were the sampling units, they were oriented so as to cover all the heterogeneity within the respective habitats. In the annually burned savanna and gallery forest which are spatially continuous, transects were separated by at least 200 m in such a manner as to be representative of the areas. Each transect was subdivided into 20 contiguous quadrats of 10 m2 (5 × 2 m) each in order to standardize the sampling effort. In all quadrats, we hand-searched all microhabitats (logs, litter, stumps, twigs, nests, runways sheeting, fallen branches, etc.) up to a height of 2 m above ground level. As this method was designed for use in forests, we made modifications in the savanna by searching for termites between grass tufts or by uprooting them. All termites encountered were collected. Twelve samples of surface soil (each about 12 × 12 cm to 10 cm depth) were dug out in the quadrat at random locations. The soil was hand-sorted in situ and a representative sample of the termites (around 10 individuals of each termite caste present) was sorted and put into 70% ethyl alcohol. Termites collected were both of the soldier and worker castes; the alates were excluded because they did not necessarily imply the presence of a viable colony. In order to sample all 20 quadrats in one day, four trained collectors were deployed, with two people at a time sampling 10 quadrats for 30 min per quadrat. Following Andersen (Reference ANDERSEN1991), samplings were based on the occurrence of individuals (presence–absence) rather than their number with respect to the social habit of termites. The field work took place in July and August of 2005. This period, corresponding with the short dry season at Lamto, was especially favourable for sampling. In our area, foraging activities of termites are more evident during dry seasons as they consume preferentially dry plant matter; this allowed us easy access to a great number of species.

Identification and feeding group classification

All sampled termites were identified at the Royal Museum for Central Africa in Tervuren (Belgium). Specimens were identified to the level of species or, where this proved impossible, to numbered morphospecies using standard determination keys such as those of Webb (Reference WEBB1961), Bouillon & Mathot (Reference BOUILLON and MATHOT1965, Reference BOUILLON and MATHOT1966, Reference BOUILLON and MATHOT1971) and the descriptions made by Grassé (Reference GRASSÉ1986). After the identification, each species was placed into one of four feeding groups (fungus-growers, soil-feeders, wood-feeders and grass-feeders) defined according to termite diet (Josens Reference JOSENS1972), mandible morphology (Deligne Reference DELIGNE1966) and gut content in the worker caste (Sands Reference SANDS1998). All fungus-growers belong to the subfamily Macrotermitinae. They consume grass, dung, wood and litter via an exo-symbiosis with the fungus Termitomyces for the decomposition of plant matter. The soil-feeders feed on soil organic matter and occasionally on very decayed wood. Most wood-feeders consume dead wood but some species feed on living plants. The grass-feeders are exclusive consumers of grassy litter. The species of the Lamto savanna belong exclusively to the genus Trinervitermes.

Environmental variables

Five equidistant vegetation survey plots of 100 m2 (10 × 10 m) were established along each transect to describe the structure, diversity (on species level) and abundance of woody plants. As this component is more sensitive to fire than grasses, it is very decisive for the constancy of the respective ecosystems (Hien Reference HIEN1995, Sankaran et al. Reference SANKARAN, HANAN, ACHOLES, RATNAM, AUGUSTINE, CADE, GIGNOUX, HIGGINS, LE ROUX, LUDWIG, ARDO, BANYIKWA, BROON, BUCINNI, CAYLOR, COUGHENOUR, DIOUF, EKAYA, FERAL, FEBRUARY, FROST, HIERNAUX, HRABAR, METZGER, PRINS, RINGROSE, SEA, TEWS, WORDEN and ZAMBATIS2005). The plots were directly adjacent to the transects in order to investigate the relationship between vegetation dynamics and termite abundances. The methodology consisted in identifying and counting plant species in each plot. Plant species richness and density were used as references to detect differences in vegetation structures. At habitat level, plant species richness was defined as the mean number of species identified per transect and plant density as the average of the medians calculated per transect.

Along each transect, five soil sample composites (0–20 cm depth) were obtained by taking soils at three random locations within each plot of 10 m2 and mixing them. These samples were air-dried and passed through a 2-mm sieve before analysing their physico-chemical properties in the laboratory as follows: pH(water) values were measured electronically on soil-to-water suspensions (Baize Reference BAIZE2000), soil organic carbon was determined by the method of Anne (AFNOR 1996), total nitrogen and particle size (clay, silt and sand) by Kjeldahl and Robinson methods respectively (Anderson & Ingram Reference ANDERSON and INGRAM1993).

Data analysis

Sampling completeness was tested by constructing sample-based species accumulation curves and by recording the auto-similarity which is the mean similarity between transects of the same habitat type. The observed (Sobs) and estimated (Chao2) species accumulation curves were constructed after randomizing 500 times the sample order to ensure the statistical representation of the target community (Cao et al. Reference CAO, WILLIAMS and LARSEN2002, Colwell & Coddington Reference COLWELL and CODDINGTON1994). The mathematical formulations of the curves may be found by consulting the user guide of the online program EstimateS 7.50 (http://purl.oclc.org/estimates).

The species richness of termites was determined by enumerating the number of species observed over the whole transect. As we used presence-absence data, the relative abundance was defined as the number of encounters per transect, where the presence of one species in a quadrat represented one encounter (Magurran Reference MAGURRAN2004). Following the description of Colwell & Coddington (Reference COLWELL and CODDINGTON1994) for incidence data, the second order and non-parametric estimator Chao2 was used as estimator of the species richness. It takes into account the distribution of species among quadrats and it needs for its calculation only the number of species found in just one quadrat and the number of species in exactly two. Simpson's index served to measure the diversity of the termite community. This index and its evenness were computed using the program ‘Ecological Methodology’ (www.Zoology.ubc.ca/Krebs). To better visualize the similarity of transects and habitats, the Unweighted Pair-Group clustering method using arithmetic Averages (UPGMA) was performed with the software STATISTICA version 6 (www.statsoft.com). The complementarity between communities allowed the description of the differences between habitats in terms of the species identity they support (Vane-Wright et al. Reference VANE-WRIGHT, HUMPHRIES and WILLIAMS1991). We termed as ‘dominant species’ those whose total number of occurrences (from all habitats) equalled or exceeded the mean number of occurrences per habitat ( = 20). The variation of feeding group abundances across habitats was analysed using the one-way analysis of variance whereas LSD (Least Significant Difference) post hoc comparison tests were performed to detect differences between these abundances.

Redundancy Analysis (RDA) was used to investigate the effects of environmental variables (woody plant species richness, woody plant density, soil pH, soil carbon, soil nitrogen, clay, silt and sand) on species abundances (ter Braak & Smilauer Reference TER BRAAK and SMILAUER2002) using CANOCO for windows 4.5 (www.canoco.com). For the clarity of the ordination and because of a strong colinearity between some variables, we made first a detailed examination of the correlation matrix of environmental variables in order to identify the subset to be introduced in the ordination by removing one of highly correlated variables in relative composition data from the RDA.

RESULTS

Sampling efficiency

The curves corresponding to observed species accumulation with increasing sampled area and estimated species richness were very similar for all habitats (Figure 3). Thus, the species richness observed was considered a very good estimate of that expected in each habitat. The values of auto-similarity varied little from one habitat to the next (Table 1). Transects did not differ in their taxonomic composition within the annually burned savanna, the gallery forest and the forest island for which auto-similarity values were 0.51, 0.54 and 0.48 respectively. In contrast, with 0.38 as auto-similarity value, transects belonging to the savanna woodland differed slightly among each other. The values of sampling coverage were high for all habitats (at least 83%). Overall, these findings point to a better estimation of the habitat-specific species pool of the termite communities after running five transects within each of the four habitats.

Table 1. Sample coverage, auto-similarity and metrics of termite diversity in the different habitats (sample coverage = ratio of the observed species richness as per cent of the estimated species richness in each habitat, auto-similarity = mean similarity between transects of each habitat, uniques = species collected only once in each habitat).

Figure 3. Sample-based accumulation curves of observed (a) and estimated species richness (b) of termites in the four habitats. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 1.

Species richness, species diversity and spatial distribution of termites

Overall, 31 species and morphospecies were found in all habitats combined (Appendix 1). By considering habitats separately, the forest island (25 species) was significantly richer than the annually burned savanna (14 species) (LSD test, P < 0.01, n = 5) and the savanna woodland (18 species) (LSD test, P < 0.05, n = 5). In contrast, the gallery forest (20 species) did not differ statistically from the savannas (Figure 4). Although the number of species varied from one habitat to the other, Simpson's diversity index was similarly high for all habitats. However, evenness was low for the savanna woodland and the forest island and high for the annually burned savanna and the gallery forest (Table 1).

Figure 4. Termite mean species richness in habitats. Histograms with same letters did not differ significantly at P = 0.05 level (LSD post hoc comparison tests, n = 5). Bars are standard errors.

To discover how widely termite species were distributed in the habitats, we performed a cluster analysis at transect and habitat levels. At the transect level, the clusters were not formed according to the habitat type (figure not shown). In contrast, at the habitat level, two distinctive groups were formed clearly (Figure 5), each composed of habitats belonging to the two main ecosystems (i.e. savanna and forest). The complementarity showed that the termite community compositions were closely overlapping for the gallery forest and the forest island. In contrast, these two forests were very dissimilar to the annually burned savanna but only slightly so to the savanna woodland (Table 2). The annually burned savanna shared only 11 species out of 23 with the gallery forest and 12 species out of 27 with the forest island. Only two and three species collected in this regularly burned habitat were absent in the forest island and the gallery forest respectively. Out of the 18 species collected in the savanna woodland, four and six were not found in the two forest habitats respectively.

Figure 5. Classification of habitats based on their termite species composition with UPGMA (Unweighted Pair-Group Method using Arithmetic averages) using 1-Jaccard index as the distance between groups. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 1.

Table 2. Community complementarity (1-Jaccard's similarity index) between habitats. Data in cells are reported as follows: species in both habitats/species shared/complementarity.

Relative abundance of termites across habitats

According to their feeding habit, termite species were assigned to the four feeding groups listed in Table 3. The total abundance of fungus-growers did not vary significantly across habitats. However, their abundance in the savanna woodland was significantly higher than in the annually burned savanna (LSD test, P < 0.05, n = 5), the forest island (LSD test, P < 0.05, n = 5) and the gallery forest (LSD test, P < 0.05, n = 5). With significant variation across habitats, soil-feeders were less abundant in the savanna woodland than in the annually burned savanna (LSD test, P < 0.01, n = 5), the forest island (LSD test, P < 0.01, n = 5) and the gallery forest (LSD test, P < 0.01, n = 5). Better represented in forests than in savannas, the total abundance of wood-feeding species varied significantly. They were more abundant in the forest island and the gallery forest than in the annually burned savanna (LSD test, P < 0.01 and 0.001 respectively, n = 5) and in the savanna woodland (LSD test, P < 0.05 and 0.01 respectively, n = 5). In grass-feeders restricted to the annually burned savanna, the total abundance obviously varied significantly across habitats.

Table 3. Variation of the relative abundances of termite feeding groups across habitats (using one-way ANOVA).

Using our criterion for dominant species, 8 (25.8%) out of the 31 species collected were dominant representing 461 out of 626 species occurrences. These dominant species were representative of all four feeding groups. Of the 13 fungus-growers, three were dominant (Ancistrotermes cavithorax, Microtermes toumodiensis and Pseudacanthotermes militaris) and represented 278 species occurrences (76.6%) out of 363. The number of occurrences of these species did not change significantly across habitats. The dominant soil-feeders were Adaiphrotermes sp., Aderitotermes sp. and Basidentitermes potens totalling 127 occurrences out of 156, i.e. 81.4%. Their occurrences across habitats did not vary significantly. The single dominant wood-feeding species (Microcerotermes parvus) was significantly more abundant in the two forests than in the two savanna habitats. Of overall 77 encounters with the wood-feeding species 28 were with M. parvus (36.4%). The grass-feeder Trinervitermes geminatus was restricted to the savannas and mainly to the annually burned savanna.

Effect of environmental variables on species distributions

Preliminary analysis of the correlation matrix of environmental variables allowed selecting five of the eight variables measured for redundancy analysis; these were: woody plant species richness (vegetation parameter), soil pH, soil carbon (organic matter), clay and silt (soil texture).

The ordination (RDA) of species abundances with the selected variables yielded eigenvalues of 0.143 for the first axis and 0.107 for the second while lower eigenvalues were found for the third and the fourth axes (0.057 and 0.031 respectively). All axes showed high correlations between species and variables; the coefficients were 0.888, 0.863, 0.851 and 0.783 respectively (Table 4). Of the variables included in the ordination, only two (pH and woody plant species richness) explained significant variation in species abundances (Monte-Carlo permutation tests for the pH: F = 2.13, P < 0.01, for woody plant species richness: F = 1.96, P < 0.05) (Figure 6). As the cosine of the angle between the arrows of a species and an environmental variable is an approximation of the correlation coefficient between the species and the environmental variable, some species (P. aff. spiniger, P. militaris, Odontotermes sp. 2, Odontotermes sp. 1, F. tenebricus, A. guineensis, A. cavithorax, A. evuncifer and Astratotermes sp.) were inferred to be positively correlated with the pH. If arrows are drawn for these species, they make sharp angles with the arrow for pH. This inference was better supported for P. aff. spiniger, P. militaris, Odontotermes sp. 2, Odontotermes sp. 1, F. tenebricus, A. guineensis and A. cavithorax than for A. evuncifer and Astratotermes sp. because the former species lie much further from the centre of the diagram than the latter two species. In contrast, M. fuscotibialis, Odontotermes sp. 3 and N. latifrons were negatively correlated with the pH. As for woody plant species richness, it showed strong negative correlations with the grass-feeders T. geminatus and T. oeconomus and the soil-feeders Adaiphrotermes sp. and Aderitotermes sp.; all those species were better represented in the annually burned savanna than in other habitats. Surprisingly, some wood-feeding species (N. arborum, N. latifrons, M. fuscotibialis and M. parvus) did not show significant correlations with this vegetation parameter. Although not decisive in the overall variation of species abundances, soil carbon was clearly positively correlated with the soil feeder B. potens. Overall, a number of species showed little change in their abundance in relation to environmental variables; this fact was illustrated by their positions towards the centre of the diagram.

Table 4. Summary statistics for RDA with the environmental variables.

Figure 6. Diagram of RDA ordination of termite species abundances and environmental variables (data with arrows). Species abbreviations: cav, Ancistrotermes cavithorax; gui, Ancistrotermes guineensis; bel, Macrotermes bellicosus; sub, Macrotermes subhyalinus; gif: Megaprotermes giffardii; toum, Microtermes toumodiensis; od1, Odontotermes sp. 1; od2, Odontotermes sp. 2; od3, Odontotermes sp. 3; mil, Pseudacanthotermes militaris; mino, Pseudacanthotermes aff. minor; spin, Pseudacanthotermes aff. spiniger; evun, Amitermes evuncifer; adai, Adaiphrotermes sp., ader, Aderitotermes sp.; astra, Astratotermes sp.; pot, Basidentitermes potens; peri, Pericapritermes sp.; proc, Procubitermes sp.; prom, Promirotermes sp.; term, Termes sp.; copt, Coptotermes sp.; full, Fulleritermes tenebricus; fusco, Microcerotermes fuscotibialis; parv, Microcerotermes parvus; arbo, Nasutitermes arborum; latf, Nasutitermes latifrons; lama, Schedorhinotermes lamanianus; gem, Trinervitermes geminatus; oeco, Trinervitermes oeconomus. Variable abbreviations: WPR, woody plant species richness, C, soil carbon.

DISCUSSION

Sampling efficiency

We evaluated sampling efficacy with sample-based species accumulation curves and auto-similarity of transects within the same habitats. With 100 quadrats of 10 m2 the termite species richness was efficiently assessed in most habitats. This fact was illustrated on the one hand by the plateaux attained by the observed species accumulation curves, and on the other hand by high auto-similarity values for the gallery forest, the annually burned savanna and the forest island. Our data were close to those of Roisin & Leponce (Reference ROISIN and LEPONCE2004) concerning the link between the species accumulation curves and the number of unique species. In fact, the species accumulation curves level off when the number of unique species starts decreasing, which was observed in our study with regard to the low number of unique species in habitats despite the high sample coverage.

Our data provided also a good picture of termite species composition with five transects per habitat contrary to Jones & Eggleton (Reference JONES and EGGLETON2000) who used only one transect. At least 80% of the expected termite species were sampled in each habitat while these authors found only 31–36% of the known local pool of termite species. They were satisfied with this in the sense that the taxonomic and functional group composition of the transect samples did not differ significantly from that of the known local fauna. In this study, the far more complete assessment of termite species richness and diversity in the savanna systems resulted on the one hand from the modification made (searches of termites between grass tufts or by uprooting them), and on the other hand from the increase of sampling effort by sampling more transects per habitat.

Thus, after successfully testing the efficiency of the method, our objective of assessing termite diversity and abundance across four habitats of the Lamto reserve differing in the vegetation cover and the fire-history could be addressed.

Species richness and species diversity of termites

As expected, more species were collected in the gallery forest and the forest island than in the annually burned savanna and the savanna woodland. Given that the two forests are not impacted by fire considered as the major cause of disturbance in the study area, their termite community was expected to vary little (Farji-Brener et al. Reference FARJI-BRENER, CORLEY and BETTINELLI2002, Hoffmann Reference HOFFMANN2003, Parr et al. Reference PARR, BOND and ROBERTSON2002). The forest island was even significantly richer than the annually burned savanna and the savanna woodland. As this forest is embedded in the savanna, it may harbour many termites by serving as refuge for species sensitive to regular fire occurrences and also by providing variable sources of nourishment with regard to its transitional (i.e. mixed savanna and forest) vegetation (Grassé Reference GRASSÉ1986). In contrast, the number of species found in the gallery forest was close to that of the savanna woodland and it did not even differ to that of the annually burned savanna. With fire being the major cause of disturbance in the Lamto savanna (Ménaut & Abbadie Reference MÉNAUT, ABBADIE, Abbadie, Gignoux, Le Roux and Lepage2006, Ménaut & César Reference MÉNAUT, CESAR, Huntley and Huntley1982, Ménaut et al. Reference MÉNAUT, GIGNOUX, PRADO and CLOBERT1990, Monnier Reference MONNIER1968), our findings suggests to refer to the intermediate disturbance hypothesis of Connell (Reference CONNELL1978) for explaining this pattern of termite species richness. It states that the maximum species richness occurs at an intermediate intensity and frequency of natural disturbance. In agreement with this statement, the development of species richness within the different habitats may be explained by the fact that the annually burned savanna allows the persistence of only disturbance-adapted species, while the most protected gallery forest might favour competitive dominance of some species preventing other species from successful settling. Nearby these two contrasting habitats, there are savanna woodlands and forest islands which are only impacted by intermediate levels of disturbance allowing the maintenance of many species. The assessment of community complementarity pointed to their intermediate species compositions with the savanna woodland still close to the annually burned savanna and the forest island closer to the gallery forest.

The species diversity index was high and almost identical for all habitats. This result suggests considering additional causal factors beside vegetation type and fire-history, for instance decomposers and predators, to better understand the pattern of termite diversity in the Lamto ecosystem. Analogous observations were made on ants across differing fire-treated habitats in the Kruger National Park (South Africa) by Parr et al. (Reference PARR, ROBERTSON, BIGGS and CHOWN2004). While the mean ant species richness and abundance did not vary significantly between treatments, significant differences were observed between regularly burned and unburned plots in the community composition. However, our results contrasted to those of other authors (Scholes & Walker Reference SCHOLES and WALKER1993, van Langevelde et al. Reference VAN LANGEVELDE, VAN DE VIJVER, KUMAR, VAN DE KOPPEL, DE RIDDER, VAN ANDEL, SKIDMORE, HEARNE, STROOSNIJDER, BOND, PRINS and RIETKERK2003) who considered fire to cause only important damage to biodiversity in savanna systems. Regarding the evenness values, termite specimens were more equitably distributed between species in the homogeneous habitats i.e. the annually burned savanna and the gallery forest. In contrast, in the savanna woodland and the forest island, possessing more heterogeneous and transitional structures, termites were not evenly distributed. This finding suggests that habitat structure may be of great importance for the spatial dynamics of termites (Farji-Brener et al. Reference FARJI-BRENER, CORLEY and BETTINELLI2002, Gillison et al. Reference GILLISON, JONES, SUSILO and BIGNELL2003, Lawton Reference LAWTON1983, McCoy & Bell Reference MCCOY, BELL, Bell, McCoy and Mushinsky1991, Tews et al. Reference TEWS, BROSE, GRIMM, TIELBÖRGER, WICHMANN, SCHWAGER and JELTSCH2004).

Termite abundances and effects of environmental variables

With 58% of the total occurrences, fungus-growers were the best-represented feeding group across habitats. Neither their total abundance nor that of the dominant species (A. cavithorax, M. toumodiensis and P. militaris) varied significantly. Thus, they were not strongly affected by habitat variability; probably because of their high ecological plasticity partly based on the homeostatic properties of their mounds and the association with symbiotic fungi (Konaté Reference KONATÉ1998). The pH was the most influential variable, for instance for A. cavithorax, A. guineensis, Odontotermes sp. 1, Odontotermes sp. 2, P. militaris and P. aff. spiniger. Alkaline environments seem to favour fungus-growing species, which agrees with Boyer (Reference BOYER1973) who found high concentrations of basic elements in the mounds of the genus Macrotermes. They consume very large amounts of litter in tropical savannas (Josens Reference JOSENS1974); so much that Watson (Reference WATSON1977) attributed to them the poverty of these soils in organic matter. In other respects, the species Protermes sp. found exclusively in the gallery forest was negatively correlated with this factor. It was not collected in savannas but its exact feeding and habitat preferences are still unknown.

As for soil-feeders, the total abundance varied significantly across habitats but that of the three dominant species (Adaiphrotermes sp., Aderitotermes sp. and B. potens) did not. Surprisingly, this feeding group was more represented in the annually burned savanna (the habitat poorest in organic matter) than in the two forest types (Abbadie & Nacro Reference ABBADIE, NACRO, Abbadie, Gignoux, Le Roux and Lepage2006). This result agrees with Tano (Reference TANO1993) who found this group abundantly in the Sudanian savanna of Booro-Borotou (north-western Côte d'Ivoire) which is also poor in resources. Such observations were made in other African areas; for instance, in the surroundings of Lubumbashi (Democratic Republic of Congo) where their biomass attained 5.26 kg m−2 in the savanna against 2.17 kg m−2 in the semi-deciduous forest and 0.17 kg m−2 in the primary forest (Freson et al. Reference FRESON, GOFFINET and MALAISSE1974). Although they feed preferentially on organic matter, only one species (B. potens) showed significant positive correlation with soil carbon. In the annually burned savanna, the organic matter is irregularly distributed through the soil profile due to the absence of dense tree root systems that maintain organic material in the superficial layers (Pirovano Reference PIROVANO1996). Following Braumann et al. (Reference BRAUMANN, BIGNELL, TAYASU, Abe, Bignell and Higashi2000), the dominance of Adaiphrotermes sp. and Aderitotermes sp. in this savanna could be explained by the fact that they feed not only on relatively well-dispersed soil organic matter but also on highly fragmented plant tissues and refractory debris such as lignified cell walls, old xylem vessels and their dismembered secondary thickenings.

As expected, the relative abundance of wood-feeders was higher in the forests than in the savannas because of large amounts of dead wood, dead stumps, leaf litter and living woody plants (Jones et al. Reference JONES, SUSILO, BIGNELL, SURYO, GILLISON and EGGLETON2003). This pattern was most pronounced in the only dominant species (M. parvus). However, none of the wood-feeding species (N. arborum, N. latifrons, M. fuscotibialis and M. parvus) showed a significant correlation with woody plant species richness. As these species feed also on dead wood and litter (Josens Reference JOSENS1972) one would expect them to be more tolerant to moderate tree invasion.

The grass-feeding species (T. geminatus and T. oeconomus) were restricted to savanna habitats and particularly to the annually burned savanna which provides very large quantities of grass. Tree invasion is a negative factor for grass-feeders as shown by the significant negative correlation between these species abundances and woody plant species richness.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Kouassi Kouassi JB, N'Goran Bernard, Koffi Toussaint and Koffi Louis for their technical assistance in the field. We are grateful to Professor Jean Deligne (Royal Museum for Central Africa, Belgium) for his supervision during the identification of termites and to Professor Maurice Leponce (Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences) for his helpful comments on the first draft of this manuscript. This study was conducted in the frame of the BIOTA-West project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Appendix 1. List of species and morphospecies collected and their frequency of occurrences in the habitats. The dominant species are in bold and the symbol * indicates those whose frequency of occurrences varied significantly across habitats. Abbreviations: fg, fungus-growers; sf, soil-feeders; wf, wood-feeders; gf, grass-feeders.

References

LITERATURE CITED

ABBADIE, L. & NACRO, H. B. 2006. Origin, distribution and composition of organic matter. Pp. 201214 in Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. (eds.). Lamto: structure, functioning and dynamics of a savanna ecosystem. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
ABBADIE, L., GIGNOUX, J., LE ROUX, X. & LEPAGE, M. 2006. Lamto: structure, functioning and dynamics of a savanna ecosystem. Springer Verlag, New York. 412 pp.Google Scholar
AFNOR, 1996. Qualité des sols. Recueil de normes françaises. (Third edition). La Défense, Paris. 534 pp.Google Scholar
ANDERSEN, A. N. 1991. Sampling communities of ground-foraging ants: pitfall catches compared with quadrat counts in an Australian tropical savanna. Australian Journal of Ecology 16:273279.Google Scholar
ANDERSON, J. M. & INGRAM, J. S. I. 1993. Tropical soil biology and fertility. A handbook of methods. CAB International, Wallingford. 221 pp.Google Scholar
BAIZE, D. 2000. Guide des analyses en pédologie: techniques et pratiques. Editions INRA, Paris. 260 pp.Google Scholar
BOND, W. J. 1997. Fire. Pp. 421446 in Cowling, R. M., Richardson, R. M. & Pierce, S. (eds.). Vegetation of Southern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
BOUILLON, A. & MATHOT, G. 1965. Quel est ce termite Africain? Université de Léopoldville, Léopoldville. 115 pp.Google Scholar
BOUILLON, A. & MATHOT, G. 1966. Quel est ce termite africain? Supplément N° 1. Université Lovanium, Kinshassa. 23 pp.Google Scholar
BOUILLON, A. & MATHOT, G. 1971. Quel est ce termite africain? Supplément N°2. Université Nationale du Zaïre, Kinshassa. 48 pp.Google Scholar
BOULINIER, T., NICHOLS, J. D., SAUER, J. R., HINE, J. E. & POLLOCK, K. H. 1998. Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79:10181028.Google Scholar
BOYER, P. 1973. Action de certains termites constructeurs sur l'évolution des sols tropicaux. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie, Paris 12:329498.Google Scholar
BRAUMANN, A., BIGNELL, D. E. & TAYASU, I. 2000. Soil-feeding termites: biology, microbial associations and digestive mechanisms. Pp. 233259 in Abe, T., Bignell, D. E. & Higashi, M. (eds.). Termites: evolution, sociality, symbiosis, ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAO, Y., WILLIAMS, D. D. & LARSEN, P. D. 2002. Comparison of ecological communities: the problem of sample representativeness. Ecological Monogaphs 72:313318.Google Scholar
COLWELL, R. K. & CODDINGTON, J. A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society, London B 345:101118.Google ScholarPubMed
CONNELL, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:13021310.Google Scholar
DAVIES, R. G. 1997. Termite species richness in fire-prone and fire protected dry deciduous dipterocarp forest in Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Northern Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13:153160.Google Scholar
DELIGNE, J. 1966. Caractères adaptatifs au régime alimentaire dans la mandibule des termites (Insectes Isoptères). Compte rendu d'Académie des Sciences, Paris 263:13231325.Google Scholar
EGGLETON, P., BIGNELL, D. E., HAUSER, S., DIBOG, L., NORGROVE, L. & MADONG, B. 2002. Termite diversity across an anthropogenic disturbance gradient in the humid forest zone of West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 9:189202.Google Scholar
FARJI-BRENER, A. G., CORLEY, J. C. & BETTINELLI, J. 2002. The effects of fire on ant communities in north-western Patagonia: the importance of habitat structure and regional context. Diversity & Distributions 8:235243.Google Scholar
FRESON, R., GOFFINET, G. & MALAISSE, F. 1974. Ecological effects of the regressive succession muhulu-miombo-savanna in Upper Shaba, Zaire. Pp. 365371 in First International Congress of Ecology (ed.). Structure, functioning and management of ecosystems. PUDOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
GAUTIER, L. 1990. Contact forêt-savane en Côte d'Ivoire centrale: évolution du recouvrement ligneux des savanes de la réserve de Lamto (sud du V Baoulé). Candollea 45:627641.Google Scholar
GIGNOUX, J. 1994. Modélisation de la coexistence herbes/arbres en savane. Thèse de l'INA Paris-Grignon. 175 pp.Google Scholar
GILLISON, A. N., JONES, D. T., SUSILO, F. X. & BIGNELL, D. E. 2003. Vegetation indicates diversity of soil macroinvertebrates: a case study with termites along a land-use intensification gradient in lowland Sumatra. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 3:111126.Google Scholar
GILLON, D. 1983. The fire problem in tropical savannas. Pp. 617641 in Bourlière, F. (ed.) Tropical savannas. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
GRASSÉ, P. P. 1986. Comportement, socialité, écologie, évolution, systématique. Termitologia. Tome III. Masson, Paris. 715 pp.Google Scholar
HIEN, F. 1995. La régénération de l'espace sylvo-pastoral au Sahel. Une étude de l'effet de mesures de conservation des eaux et sol au Burkina Faso. Document sur la gestion des ressources tropicales. Thèse de Doctorat. Wageningen Agricultural University. Wageningen. 223 pp.Google Scholar
HOFFMANN, B. D. 2003. Responses of ant communities to experimental fire regimes on rangelands in the Victoria River District of the Northern Territory. Austral Ecology 28:182195.Google Scholar
HOLT, J. A. & LEPAGE, M. 2000. Termites and soil properties. Pp. 389407 in Abe, T., Bignell, D. E. & Higashi, M. (eds.). Termites: evolution, sociality, symbiosis, ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
JONES, D. T. & EGGLETON, P. 2000. Sampling termite assemblages in tropical forests: testing a rapid biodiversity assessment protocol. Journal of Applied Ecology 37:191203.Google Scholar
JONES, D. T., LAWTON, J. H. & SHACHAK, M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373386.Google Scholar
JONES, D. T., SUSILO, F.-X., BIGNELL, D. E., SURYO, H., GILLISON, A. N. & EGGLETON, P. 2003. Termite assemblage collapse along a land-use intensification gradient in lowland central Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:380391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOSENS, G. 1972. Etudes biologiques et écologiques des termites (Isoptera) de la savane de Lamto. Thèse de doctorat de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles. 262 pp.Google Scholar
JOSENS, G. 1974. Etude fonctionnelle de quelques animaux: les termites. Bulletin de Liaison des Chercheurs de Lamto, Numéro spécial 91–131.Google Scholar
JOSENS, G. 1983. The soil fauna 3: the termites. Pp. 505524 in Bourlière, F. (ed.). The tropical savannas. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
KONATÉ, S. 1998. Structure dynamique et rôle des buttes termitiques dans le fonctionnement d'une savane préforestière (Lamto, Côte d'Ivoire): le termite champignonniste Odontotermes comme ingénieur de l'écosystème. Thèse de doctorat de l'Université Paris 6. 252 pp.Google Scholar
KONATÉ, S., LE ROUX, X., TESSIER, D. & LEPAGE, M. 1999. Influence of large termitaria on soil characteristics, soil water regime, and tree leaf shedding pattern in a West African savanna. Plant and Soil 206:4760.Google Scholar
KONATÉ, S., LE ROUX, X., VERDIER, D. & LEPAGE, M., 2003. Effect of underground fungus-growing termites on carbon dioxide emission at the point and landscape scales in an African savanna. Functional Ecology 17:305314.Google Scholar
KONATÉ, S., YEO, K., YOBOUET, L., ALONSO, L. E. & KOUASSI, K. 2005. Evaluation rapide de la diversité des insectes des forêts classées de la Haute Dodo et du Cavally (Côte d'Ivoire). Pp. 3949 in Alonso, L. L., Lauginie, F. & Rondeau, G. (eds). Evaluation biologique de deux forêts classées du sud-ouest de la Côte d'Ivoire. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 34. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
LAWTON, J. H. 1983. Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 28:2339.Google Scholar
LE ROUX, X., GIGNOUX, J. & SIMIONI, G. 2006. Modeling the relationships between vegetation structure and functioning and savanna functioning from plot region. Pp. 163181 in Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. (eds.). Lamto: structure, functioning and dynamics of a savanna ecosystem. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
LEE, K. E. & WOOD, T. G. 1971. Termites and soils. Academic Press, London. 251 pp.Google Scholar
MAGURRAN, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford. 256 pp.Google Scholar
MCCOY, E. D. & BELL, S. S. 1991. Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. Pp. 327 in Bell, S. S., McCoy, E. D. & Mushinsky, H. R. (eds.) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman & Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MÉNAUT, J. C. 1971. Etude de quelques peuplements ligneux d'une savane guinéenne de Côte d'Ivoire. Thèse de doctorat 3ème cycle à la Faculté des sciences de Paris. 141 pp.Google Scholar
MÉNAUT, J. C. 1983. The vegetation of African savannas. Pp. 109149 in Boulière, F. (ed.). The tropical savannas. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
MÉNAUT, J. C. & ABBADIE, L. 2006. Vegetation. Pp. 6372 in Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. (eds.). Lamto: structure, functioning and dynamics of a savanna ecosystem. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
MÉNAUT, J. C. & CESAR, J. 1979. Structure and primary productivity of Lamto savannas (Ivory Coast). Ecology 60:11971210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MÉNAUT, J. C. & CESAR, J. 1982. Structure and dynamics of a West African savanna. Pp. 81102 in Huntley, B. J. & Huntley, B. H. (eds.). Ecology of tropical savannas. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
MÉNAUT, J. C., GIGNOUX, J., PRADO, C., & CLOBERT, J. 1990. Modeling tree community dynamics in a humid savanna of Côte d'Ivoire: effects of fire and competition with grass and neighbors. Journal of Biogeography 17:471481.Google Scholar
MONNIER, Y. 1968. Les effets du feu de brousse sur une savane préforestière de Côte d'Ivoire. Etudes Eburnéennes. 240 pp.Google Scholar
MORDELET, P. 1993. Influence of tree shading on carbon assimilation of grass leaves in Lamto savanna, Côte d'Ivoire. Acta Oecologica 14:119127.Google Scholar
PARR, C. L. & CHOWN, S. L. 2003. Burning issues for conservation: a critique of faunal fire research in Southern Africa. Austral Ecology 28:384395.Google Scholar
PARR, C. L., BOND, W. L. & ROBERTSON, H. 2002. A preliminary study of the effect of fire on ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a South African savanna. African Entomology 10:101111.Google Scholar
PARR, C. L., ROBERTSON, H., BIGGS, H. C. & CHOWN, S. L. 2004. Response of African savanna ants to long-term fire regimes. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:630642.Google Scholar
PIROVANO, C. 1996. Studio di dinamiche del carbonio e dell'azoto in suoli tropicali sotto savanna e sotto foresta in Costa d'Avorio. Laurea in science ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano.Google Scholar
RAMANKUTTY, N. & FOLEY, J. A. 1999. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13:9971027.Google Scholar
ROISIN, Y. & LEPONCE, M. 2004. Characterizing termite assemblages in fragmented forests: a test case in the Argentinian Chaco. Austral Ecology 29:637646.Google Scholar
SANDS, W. A. 1998. The identification of worker castes of termite genera from soils of Africa and the Middle East. CAB International, New York. 500 pp.Google Scholar
SANKARAN, M., HANAN, N. P., ACHOLES, R. J., RATNAM, J., AUGUSTINE, D. J., CADE, B. S., GIGNOUX, J., HIGGINS, S. I., LE ROUX, X., LUDWIG, F., ARDO, J., BANYIKWA, F., BROON, F., BUCINNI, G., CAYLOR, K. K., COUGHENOUR, M. B., DIOUF, A., EKAYA, W., FERAL, C. J., FEBRUARY, E. C., FROST, P. G. H., HIERNAUX, P., HRABAR, H., METZGER, K. L., PRINS, H. H. T., RINGROSE, S., SEA, W., TEWS, J., WORDEN, J. & ZAMBATIS, N. 2005. Determinants of woody cover in African savannas: a continental scale analysis. Nature 438:846849.Google Scholar
SANKARAN, M., RATNAM, J. & HANAN, N. 2008. Woody cover in African savannas: the role of resources, fire and herbivory. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17:236245.Google Scholar
SCHOLES, R. J. & WALKER, B. H. 1993. An African savanna: synthesis of the Nylsvley study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 318 pp.Google Scholar
TAINTON, N. M. & MENTIS, M. T. 1984. Fire in grassland. Pp. 115148 in Booysen, P. de V. & Tainton, N. M. (eds.). Ecological effects of fire in South African ecosystems. Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TANO, Y. 1993. Les termitières épigées d'un basin versant en savane soudanienne: répartition et dynamique des nids, rôle sur les sols et sur la végétation. Thèse d'Etat ès Sciences, Université Nationale de Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan. 250 pp.Google Scholar
TER BRAAK, C. J. F. & SMILAUER, P. 2002. Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca. 500 pp.Google Scholar
TEWS, J., BROSE, U., GRIMM, V., TIELBÖRGER, K., WICHMANN, M. C., SCHWAGER, M. & JELTSCH, F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography 31:7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TROLLOPE, W. S. W. 1984. Fire in savanna. Pp. 151175 in de V. Booysen, P. & Tainton, N. M. (eds.). Ecological effects of fire in South African ecosystems. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
TROLLOPE, W. S. W., TROLLOPE, L. A., BIGGS, H. C., PIENAAR, D. & POTGIETER, A. L. F. 1998. Long term changes in woody vegetation of Kruger National Park with special reference to the effects of elephants and fire. Koedoe 41:103112.Google Scholar
VANE-WRIGHT, R. I., HUMPHRIES, C. J. & WILLIAMS, P. H. 1991. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55:235254.Google Scholar
VAN LANGEVELDE, F., VAN DE VIJVER, C. A. D. M., KUMAR, L., VAN DE KOPPEL, J., DE RIDDER, N., VAN ANDEL, J., SKIDMORE, A. K., HEARNE, J. W., STROOSNIJDER, L., BOND, W. J., PRINS, H. H. T. & RIETKERK, M. 2003. Effects of fire and herbivory on the stability of savanna ecosystems. Ecology 84:337350.Google Scholar
VUATTOUX, R. 1970. Observations sur l'évolution des strates arborée et arbustive dans la savane de Lamto (Côte d'Ivoire). Annales de l'Université d'Abidjan, série E 3:285315.Google Scholar
VUATTOUX, R. 1976. Contribution à l'étude de l'évolution des strates arborée et arbustive dans la savane de Lamto (Côte d'Ivoire). Deuxième note. Annales de l'Université d'Abidjan, série C 7:3563.Google Scholar
WATSON, J. P. 1977. The use of mounds of the termite Macrotermes falciger (Gerstacker) as a soil amendement. Journal of Soil Science 28:664672.Google Scholar
WEBB, G. C. 1961. Keys of the genera of the African termites adapted from revision Der Termiten Afrikas of Sjöestedt. Ibadan University Press, Ibadan. 35 pp.Google Scholar
WOOD, T. G. & SANDS, W. A. 1978. The role of termites in ecosystems. Pp. 245292 in Brian, M. V. (ed.). Production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the Lamto reserve showing habitat variability (modified from Gautier 1990). Transects are numbered from 1 to 5. Habitat abbreviations: ABS, annually burned savanna; SW, savanna woodland; FI, forest island and GF, gallery forest.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Total annual precipitation and mean annual temperature at Lamto over the two decades before the study (1986–2005) (data source: Station of Geophysics of Lamto).

Figure 2

Table 1. Sample coverage, auto-similarity and metrics of termite diversity in the different habitats (sample coverage = ratio of the observed species richness as per cent of the estimated species richness in each habitat, auto-similarity = mean similarity between transects of each habitat, uniques = species collected only once in each habitat).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Sample-based accumulation curves of observed (a) and estimated species richness (b) of termites in the four habitats. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 1.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Termite mean species richness in habitats. Histograms with same letters did not differ significantly at P = 0.05 level (LSD post hoc comparison tests, n = 5). Bars are standard errors.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Classification of habitats based on their termite species composition with UPGMA (Unweighted Pair-Group Method using Arithmetic averages) using 1-Jaccard index as the distance between groups. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 1.

Figure 6

Table 2. Community complementarity (1-Jaccard's similarity index) between habitats. Data in cells are reported as follows: species in both habitats/species shared/complementarity.

Figure 7

Table 3. Variation of the relative abundances of termite feeding groups across habitats (using one-way ANOVA).

Figure 8

Table 4. Summary statistics for RDA with the environmental variables.

Figure 9

Figure 6. Diagram of RDA ordination of termite species abundances and environmental variables (data with arrows). Species abbreviations: cav, Ancistrotermes cavithorax; gui, Ancistrotermes guineensis; bel, Macrotermes bellicosus; sub, Macrotermes subhyalinus; gif: Megaprotermes giffardii; toum, Microtermes toumodiensis; od1, Odontotermes sp. 1; od2, Odontotermes sp. 2; od3, Odontotermes sp. 3; mil, Pseudacanthotermes militaris; mino, Pseudacanthotermes aff. minor; spin, Pseudacanthotermes aff. spiniger; evun, Amitermes evuncifer; adai, Adaiphrotermes sp., ader, Aderitotermes sp.; astra, Astratotermes sp.; pot, Basidentitermes potens; peri, Pericapritermes sp.; proc, Procubitermes sp.; prom, Promirotermes sp.; term, Termes sp.; copt, Coptotermes sp.; full, Fulleritermes tenebricus; fusco, Microcerotermes fuscotibialis; parv, Microcerotermes parvus; arbo, Nasutitermes arborum; latf, Nasutitermes latifrons; lama, Schedorhinotermes lamanianus; gem, Trinervitermes geminatus; oeco, Trinervitermes oeconomus. Variable abbreviations: WPR, woody plant species richness, C, soil carbon.

Figure 10

Appendix 1. List of species and morphospecies collected and their frequency of occurrences in the habitats. The dominant species are in bold and the symbol * indicates those whose frequency of occurrences varied significantly across habitats. Abbreviations: fg, fungus-growers; sf, soil-feeders; wf, wood-feeders; gf, grass-feeders.