Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T02:07:10.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interactions between galling insects and leaf-feeding insects: the role of plant phenolic compounds and their possible interference with herbivores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

Enrique Pascual-Alvarado
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Michoacán, México
Pablo Cuevas-Reyes*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología de Interacciones Bióticas, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia, Michoacán, México
Mauricio Quesada
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Michoacán, México
Ken Oyama
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Michoacán, México
*
1Corresponding author. Email: pcuevas@oikos.unam.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of gall induction on leaf phenolic compounds and their indirect effects on the subsequent attack of folivorous insects in Achatocarpus gracilis, Cordia alliodora, Guapira macrocarpa, Guettarda elliptica and Ruprechtia fusca that occur in both hillside and riparian sites at Chamela-Cuixmala tropical dry forest in western Mexico. There are differences in soil water content between riparian and hillside sites where trees in the first are mainly evergreen and deciduous in the second. A few tree species occur in both sites and their intraspecific phenological response is also different between sites. In this case, trees of a given species that occur in riparian sites will be evergreen whereas trees on hillsides of the same species will be deciduous. Four plant species had significantly greater total phenol concentrations in galled than ungalled leaves in both deciduous hillside and riparian sites. In three plant species associated with galls, host total phenol concentrations were significantly greater in short than in tall plants. The frequency and amount of folivore damage were greater in leaves without galls than leaves with galls in these four plant species. These results indicate that galling insect species may directly affect leaf phenolic concentrations and indirectly may affect the incidence and consumption of folivorous insects in tropical plant species. This may have important consequences on the preference of leaves by folivorous insects that might be excluded by galling insect species in this dry tropical system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

INTRODUCTION

Several studies of plant–insect interactions have evaluated the potential effects of plant chemical defences on herbivore performance and host-selection behaviour (Kolehmainen et al. Reference KOLEHMAINEN, ROININEN, JULKUNEN-TIITTO and TAHVANAINEN1994, Roininen et al. Reference ROININEN, PRICE, JULKUNEN-TIITTO, TAHVANAINEN and IKONEN1999). Studies of plant-mediated interactions between different types of insect feeding guilds are relatively rare, particularly in the tropics (Fisher et al. Reference FISHER, HARTLEY and YOUNG2000, Taper & Case Reference TAPER and CASE1987). The best-documented case is the induction of plant defences (Tallamy & Raupp Reference TALLAMY and RAUPP1991). Plant secondary compounds may be induced by herbivore attack and these may vary with the herbivore species and the amount of leaf area removed in each plant species (Dicke Reference DICKE2000, Karban & Baldwin Reference KARBAN and BALDWIN1997). In some cases, changes induced by herbivory lead to the induction of plant resistance, but in others, specialist herbivores are capable of inducing and sequestering the secondary compounds produced by the host plant (Dicke Reference DICKE2000).

Galling insects induce tumours on their host plants in response to chemical stimulus. This induction is either made by saliva injection or other fluid secretions produced by the adult insects while laying eggs; or by larvae inside of the plant tissue (Ananthakrishnan Reference ANANTHAKRISHNAN and Ananthakrishan1984, Dreger-Jauffret & Shorthouse Reference DREGER-JAUFFRET, SHORTHOUSE, Shorthouse and Rohfritsch1992, Price et al. Reference PRICE, ROININEN and TAHVANAINEN1987). Each galling insect species has the ability to manipulate the growth and development of plant tissue (Cuevas-Reyes et al. Reference CUEVAS-REYES, SIEBE, MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS and OYAMA2003, Reference CUEVAS-REYES, QUESADA, HANSON, DIRZO and OYAMA2004a; Weis et al. Reference WEIS, WALTON and CREGO1988) and may also be capable of modifying host nutritional quality and plant secondary metabolites for protection against natural enemies (Cornell Reference CORNELL1983, Fernandes & Price Reference FERNANDES and PRICE1992, Hartley & Lawton Reference HARTLEY and LAWTON1992, Langenheim & Stubblebine Reference LANGENHEIM and STUBBLEBINE1983, Waring & Price Reference WARING and PRICE1990).

The nutritional hypothesis states that galled plant tissues contain greater amounts of nutrients and lower concentrations of defensive compounds than other plant tissues not used by galls (Hartley Reference HARTLEY1998, Stone & Schönrogge Reference STONE and SCHÖNROGGE2003). However, the results in the literature are not consistent. In some cases, defensive chemical compounds are less abundant in galls than in normal tissues developed in the same plant (Nyman & Julkunen-Titto Reference NYMAN and JULKUNEN-TITTO2000), while other studies indicate that galls contain higher concentrations of chemical defences, such as host phenolic concentration (Hartley Reference HARTLEY1998), that in many plants constitute an important factor in the defence against herbivore attack (Bennet & Walls-Grove Reference BENNET and WALLS-GROVE1994, Harborne & Grayer Reference HARBORNE, GRAYER and Harborne1993). Galling insect species can protect themselves with defence compounds of their host plants by sequestering secondary metabolites during the formation of gall tissues (Hartley Reference HARTLEY1998, Hartley & Lawton Reference HARTLEY and LAWTON1992); during this process, the host plant may induce defence compounds in leaves with galling insects that in turn may confer resistance against other herbivores that use the same leaf tissue.

In this paper, the effect of leaf-gall induction was examined on host phenolic concentration and its subsequent effects on herbivory caused by folivorous insects in several plant species that occur in both deciduous hillside and riparian sites at Chamela-Cuixmala tropical dry forest. This is the first observational study (but see Foss & Rieske Reference FOSS and RIESKE2004) that documents the interaction between galling insect species and folivorous insects and its relationship to host plant chemical defences. In particular, we addressed the following hypotheses: (1) In accordance with the nutritional hypothesis that proposed that galling insects are capable of controlling host nutritional quality and plant secondary metabolites (Hartley Reference HARTLEY1998, Hartley & Lawton Reference HARTLEY and LAWTON1992), we expected greater induction of phenolic compounds in leaves attacked by galls than in leaves free of herbivory in tropical plant species, (2) as a consequence of this, we expected that gall induction will decrease the frequency and leaf area damaged by folivores, and (3) because massive leaf-flushing occurs at the beginning of the wet season in deciduous forest and the vegetation of riparian sites remain evergreen throughout the year (Bullock & Solis-Magallanes Reference BULLOCK and SOLÍS-MAGALLANES1990, Frankie et al. Reference FRANKIE, BAKER and OPLER1974, Opler et al. Reference OPLER, FRANKIE and BAKER1980, van Schaik et al. Reference VAN SCHAIK, TERBORGH and WRIGHT1993), we expect greater levels of damage by galling insects in plants on hillsides than riparian sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study site

This study was conducted at the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve on the Pacific coast of Jalisco, Mexico that covers 13 200 ha. The elevation ranges between 0–500 m asl, with an average annual precipitation of 748 mm and the rainy season ranges from June to October (Bullock Reference BULLOCK1985). Vegetation is dominated by tropical deciduous forest, with patches of tropical riparian forest along the streams (Lott et al. Reference LOTT, BULLOCK and SOLIS-MAGALLANES1987, Rzedowski Reference RZEDOWSKI1978).

Sample collection

Surveys were conducted from July to October in 2004 during the rainy season. We chose two independent deciduous hillside and riparian sites at the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve. We sampled 30 transects of 50 × 5 m in each of two independent deciduous hillside and riparian sites at Chamela and Cuixmala (i.e. 120 transects in total, 60 deciduous hillside and 60 riparian sites). Transects were randomly selected from points obtained from a grid system developed within each site using random numbers to assure sampling independence. Individual transects were distributed in space within each site sampling across several uplands in deciduous forest, while in riparian forest transects were across different streams. Galling insect species were identified and counted on the basis of plant species and gall morphology. Because the induction by all galling insect species studied only affected leaves, we restrict our study to foliar galls.

After a preliminary analysis of presence of galling insect species and their host plants in deciduous hillside and riparian site at Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere reserve, we found 39 galling insect species represented in several orders. Diptera (family Cecidomyiidae) induced the majority of galls in both sites with 27 species (69.2%), while Homoptera (Psyllidae (5.2%) and Kermidae (7.7%)), Hymenoptera (Tanaostigmatidae (2.6%)) and Thysanoptera (2.6%) were rare; five morphospecies (12.7%) were unidentified (Cuevas-Reyes et al. Reference CUEVAS-REYES, QUESADA, HANSON, DIRZO and OYAMA2004a). Five out of a possible 39 species of galling insect were selected for study because these were the only species which were always present in both sites (Table 1).

Table 1. Galling insect species that occur in both deciduous hillside and riparian sites in the Chamela Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in Jalisco, Mexico.

We sampled 20 individuals of each of the study species to test if leaf-gall induction affected host phenolic concentration, frequency and amount of folivore damage in relation to the presence of galls on the same plant species that occur in different site conditions. We sampled the following plant species associated with galling-insect species: Achatocarpus gracilis, Cordia alliodora, Guapira macrocarpa, Guettarda elliptica and Ruprechtia fusca in all transects of each site. In all cases, the sampling extended from the canopy to the lower branches of each individual. In trees and shrubs associated with galls, we collected three galled branches and three ungalled branches at the top, intermediate and bottom of each stratum and collected in total 50 leaves in the same position along shoots, to ensure that phenological (i.e. leaf age) factors are controlled. All the leaves sampled from galled branches contained galls. The estimation of total phenol concentrations was made on a sample of leaf tissue obtained from galled and ungalled leaves, and for each leaf, determined the frequency of leaves with folivory and the leaf area removed by folivores. To estimate the leaf area removed by folivores we first obtained a digital image of each leaf and then estimated the total area of the leaf and the area removed using Sigma Scan Pro software. To control for plant size, the stem diameter at breast height (dbh) was measured for each tree and shrub sampled (Cuevas-Reyes et al. Reference CUEVAS-REYES, SIEBE and OYAMA2004b). We defined two categories of plant size: (1) short plants with dbh ≤1 cm and (2) tall plants with ≥2.5 (Gentry Reference GENTRY1982, Reference GENTRY1988).

Chemical analysis

In each individual of the five plant species of both sites, we sampled 25 leaves galled and 25 ungalled leaves without petioles. These are a subsample of the 50 leaves collected in the previous section. We only sampled surrounding leaf tissue from galled leaves and excluded the gall chamber. Fresh tissue samples of 125 mg were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. For each sample, 10 ml of ethanol (80%) was added and centrifuged (10 min, 3000 g). The supernatant samples (1 ml) were combined with deionized water (7 ml) and mixed with Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (0.5 ml, 2N). After 1 min, we added 1 ml of sodium carbonate to 20%. The tissue samples were analysed in the spectrophotometer (Cam spec M230) and the blank (deionized water: 7 ml; methanol: 1 ml; Folin–Ciocalteu reagent: 0.5 ml and sodium carbonate: 20%) was used to calibrate the spectrophotometer (Harborne Reference HARBORNE1988, Waterman & Mole Reference WATERMAN and MOLE1994). We measured the absorbance at 760 nm for each leaf tissue sampled (i.e. four samples for each leaf) using tannic acid as standard.

Statistical analysis

To determine the effect of galling insects on leaf phenolic concentration, we used two-way ANOVA analysis (Littell et al. Reference LITTELL, FREUD and SPECTOR1991). The model used site (riparian vs. deciduous), presence of galling insects (leaves with galls vs. leaves without galls) as the independent variables and the concentration of leaf phenols as the response variable. To control the variation associated with plant size, we used dbh as a covariate in the model. To compare phenolic concentrations for leaves with and without galls we used LSMeans (Littell et al. Reference LITTELL, FREUD and SPECTOR1991). This is an adjusted mean generated from least square estimate of the general linear model statistics (Littell et al. Reference LITTELL, FREUD and SPECTOR1991).

We also compared the frequency of leaves with folivores and the area removed by folivory in leaves with and without galls for each of the five plant species. In the first case, we used a generalized linear model applying the GENMOD procedure (Stokes et al. Reference STOKES, DAVIS and KOCH2000) to compare the frequency of leaves with folivores in leaves with and without galls for each of the five plant species that occurred in riparian and deciduous sites. The model used site (riparian vs. deciduous), presence of galling insects (leaves with galls vs. leaves without galls) and individual plant as the independent variables. The number of leaves with damage divided by the total number of leaves was used as the dependent variable. Because the scale and distribution of these variables did not follow a normal distribution, a binomial distribution and a logit link function were used in this analysis.

A similar analysis (i.e. generalized linear model applying the GENMOD procedure, Stokes et al. Reference STOKES, DAVIS and KOCH2000) was used to compare the area removed by folivores in leaves with and without galls for each of the five plant species that occurred in riparian and deciduous sites. The model used site (riparian vs. deciduous), presence of galling insects (leaves with galls vs. leaves without galls) and individual plant as the independent variables. The area of leaf with folivore damage divided by the total leaf area (proportion of leaf area removed) was used as the dependent variable.

We also compared the frequency of leaves with folivores in each plant and the area removed by folivores in each leaf with and without galls between plants from riparian and deciduous sites. A generalized linear model applying the GENMOD procedure (Stokes et al. Reference STOKES, DAVIS and KOCH2000) was used to analyse the frequency of folivores and leaf damage. The model used site (riparian vs. deciduous), presence of galling insects (leaves with galls vs. leaves without galls), plant species as the independent variables and all the two-way interactions. In the first analysis, the number of leaves with damage divided by the total number of leaves was used as the dependent variable and in the second analysis the area of leaf with damage divided by the total leaf area was used as the dependent variable. A binomial distribution and a logit link function were used in both analyses. To control the variation associated with plant size, we used dbh as a covariate in the model.

RESULTS

Galling insects and host total phenol concentration

In Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve, we found only five galling insect species on their specific host plant species that occurred in both deciduous and riparian sites (Table 1). No significant differences in the plant total phenolic concentrations were found between host plants of deciduous and riparian sites (F = 2.0, df = 1, P > 0.05). However, the results of the t-test for each plant species indicate that four plant species had greater total phenolic concentrations in leaves with galls than in leaves without galls (Table 2).

Table 2. Mean (± SE) total phenol concentration in galled and ungalled leaves of five host plant species that occur in both deciduous hillside and riparian sites.

In host tree species associated with galls, we found that host total phenolic concentration was significantly greater in smaller than larger plants (Achatocarpus gracilis: χ2 = 4.1, df = 1, P < 0.04; Guettarda elliptica: χ2 = 13.0, df = 1, P < 0.0004; Ruprechtia fusca: χ2 = 25.9, df = 1, P < 0.0001).

Frequency of folivorous insects

In four plant species associated with galls, the frequency of leaves with folivore damage was greater in leaves without galls than in leaves with galls (Table 3). The frequency of folivores was affected by site type. The frequency of leaves with folivore damage was significantly greater in deciduous than in riparian sites (χ2 = 24.4, df = 1, P < 0.0001). The frequency of leaves with folivore damage was greater in leaves without galls than in leaves with galls (χ2 = 92.5, df = 1, P < 0.0001) (Table 4). We found significant differences between plant species in the frequency of folivory (χ2 = 25.7, df = 4, P < 0.0001), the interaction between plant species and site: (χ2 = 24.6, df = 4, P < 0.0001and the interaction between plant species and presence of galling insects: (χ2 = 24.9, df = 4, P < 0.0001), but not for the interaction of site by presence of galling insects (χ2 = 0.74, df = 1, P > 0.05). In addition, we did not find significant differences in the frequency of leaves with folivore damage between shorter and taller plants (χ2 = 0.57, df = 1, P > 0.05).

Table 3. Mean (± SE) frequency of leaves with damage by folivores and proportion of leaf area removed by folivores on leaves with and without galls in host plant species that occur in deciduous hillside and riparian sites.

Table 4. Comparison of the frequency of leaves with damage by folivores and proportion of leaf area removed by folivores on leaves with and without galls between deciduous hillside and riparian sites.

Leaf area removed by folivores

Similarly, the proportion of leaf area removed by folivores was significantly greater in leaves without galls than in leaves with galls in four host-plant species (Table 3). The amount of folivore damage was affected by site type. The leaf area removed by folivore insects was greater in deciduous than in riparian sites and different between plant species (χ2 = 164, df = 4, P < 0.0001). The leaf area damaged by folivores was greater in leaves without galls than in leaves with galls (Table 4). There was a significant two-way interaction between plant species and presence of galling insects (χ2 = 218, df = 4, P < 0.0001) but not between plant species and site (χ2 = 2.5, df = 4, P > 0.05) nor between site and presence of galling insects (χ2 = 0.28, df = 1, P > 0.05). The leaf area removed by folivores was not significantly different between smaller and larger plants (χ2 = 0.24, df = 1, P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Galling insects and induction of phenolic compounds

Several studies have evaluated the mechanisms of manipulation and alteration of plant development involved in gall formation (Ananthakrishnan Reference ANANTHAKRISHNAN and Ananthakrishan1984, Birch et al. Reference BIRCH, BREWER, ROHFRITSCH, Shorthouse and Rohfritsch1992, Dreger-Jauffret & Shorthouse Reference DREGER-JAUFFRET, SHORTHOUSE, Shorthouse and Rohfritsch1992, Larson & Whitham Reference LARSON and WHITHAM1991, Shorthouse Reference SHORTHOUSE1986). However, little attention has been paid to the manipulation of galling insects on defensive secondary compounds of their host plants (Hartley Reference HARTLEY1998). Controversial results of this chemical manipulation have been reported. In some cases, chemical compounds such as host phenolics are less abundant in the galls than in normal plant tissues (Abrahamson & Weis Reference ABRAHAMSON, WEIS, Slansky and Rodriguez1986, Nyman & Julkunen-Titto Reference NYMAN and JULKUNEN-TITTO2000), while in other cases, galls contain higher concentrations of defence chemicals than in normal tissues (Hartley Reference HARTLEY1998, Hartley & Lawton Reference HARTLEY and LAWTON1992, Vereecke et al. Reference VEREECKE, MESSENS, KLARSKOV, DE BRUYN, VAN MONTAGU and GOETHALS1997). It was originally suggested that phenolics were produced by plants as a defence mechanism against galling insects (Tjia & Houston Reference TJIA and HOUSTON1975, Westphal et al. Reference WESTPHAL, BRONNER and LE RET1981, Zucker Reference ZUCKER1982). However, more recent studies show that host phenolic concentrations are not associated with plant resistance against galling insects (Abrahamson et al. Reference ABRAHAMSON, MCCREA, WHITWELL and VERNIER1991, Hartley Reference HARTLEY1999). In our study, we found that the concentration of phenols was greater in galled than ungalled leaves in four plant species that occur in both deciduous hillside and riparian sites at Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve. These results support the nutritional hypothesis that galling insect species have the capacity to stimulate the production of host secondary compounds increasing phenolic concentrations in the surrounding leaf tissue of galled leaves. It has been proposed that gall-induction derives some benefits to their hosts because galling insects stimulate the induction of defence compounds in leaves that confer resistance against other herbivores (Abrahamson et al. Reference ABRAHAMSON, MCCREA, WHITWELL and VERNIER1991, Askew Reference ASKEW and Ananthakrishan1984, Hartley Reference HARTLEY1998, Hartley & Lawton Reference HARTLEY and LAWTON1992).

Galling insects, plant size and host phenolic concentration

Another result of our study shows that cecidomyiids induced the majority of galls in both deciduous hillside and riparian sites of the Chamela tropical dry forest. We found in three plant species associated with galling-insects greater concentration of leaf phenolic compounds in smaller than in larger plants in both sites. This pattern may be explained by two different reasons: (1) because the production of leaf phenolic compounds is a response against galling insect attack (Hartley Reference HARTLEY1998) and (2) because shorter plants represent sites with higher nutritional tissue and undifferentiated meristems that favour the gall induction in the majority of galling insect species because the physiology of gall morphogenesis requires the stimulation by insects to undifferentiated plant tissues (Cuevas-Reyes et al. Reference CUEVAS-REYES, SIEBE and OYAMA2004b, Shorthouse Reference SHORTHOUSE1986, Weis et al. Reference WEIS, WALTON and CREGO1988). In addition, theories of plant allocation to defence would predict that smaller plants which have grown less quickly would have higher levels of phenolics (Hartley & Jones Reference HARTLEY, JONES and Crawley1997). Similarly a previous study showed that shorter plants had greater abundance of galls than larger plants (Cuevas-Reyes et al. Reference CUEVAS-REYES, QUESADA, HANSON, DIRZO and OYAMA2004a, Reference CUEVAS-REYES, SIEBE and OYAMAb, Reference CUEVAS-REYES, QUESADA and OYAMA2006).

Frequency and amount of leaf damage by folivorous insects

We also found that the frequency and amount of folivore damage on ungalled leaves were significantly greater in deciduous than in riparian sites. These results may be explained because in deciduous sites the presence of herbivore insects are synchronized with leaf flushing at the beginning of the wet season (Bullock & Solís-Magallanes Reference BULLOCK and SOLÍS-MAGALLANES1990, Lieberman Reference LIEBERMAN1982, Opler et al. Reference OPLER, FRANKIE and BAKER1980, Reich & Borchert Reference REICH and BORCHERT1984) and some insect herbivores have adjusted their life history to synchronize their youngest larval stages to the appearance of host organs such as shoots and leaves (Taylor Reference TAYLOR1986, Weis et al. Reference WEIS, WALTON and CREGO1988, Yukawa Reference YUKAWA2000), whereas in riparian sites, plants are evergreen and produce new leaves through a more extended period during the wet season (Bullock & Solís-Magallanes Reference BULLOCK and SOLÍS-MAGALLANES1990, Frankie et al. Reference FRANKIE, BAKER and OPLER1974, Opler et al. Reference OPLER, FRANKIE and BAKER1980, van Schaik et al. Reference VAN SCHAIK, TERBORGH and WRIGHT1993). There are differences in soil water content between riparian and hillside sites where trees in the former are mainly evergreen and deciduous in the latter. A few tree species occur in both sites and their intraspecific phenological response is also different between sites. In this case, trees of a given species that occur in riparian sites will be evergreen whereas trees on hillsides of the same species will be deciduous (Bullock & Solís-Magallanes Reference BULLOCK and SOLÍS-MAGALLANES1990, Frankie et al. Reference FRANKIE, BAKER and OPLER1974). Therefore, more availability of younger leaves, during a short period of time, occurs in the deciduous forest than in the riparian evergreen forest in the wet season.

Interactions between galling insects and folivorous insects

Few studies have evaluated the effects of gall induction on host defensive chemical compounds and the subsequent effects of these changes on the incidence of folivorous insects (Foss & Rieske Reference FOSS and RIESKE2004). Simultaneous herbivory by different insect guilds may result in higher selection pressures on host plants that may favour chemical induction (Mooper & Simberloff Reference MOOPER and SIMBERLOFF1995). In our study, we found that gall induction affects the chemical composition of their host plants by increasing phenolic concentration in the surrounding leaf tissue of galled leaves and affecting the subsequent incidence and herbivory levels of defoliators. The reduction of incidence and the leaf area removed in galled plant tissues by folivorous insects in four plant species of both deciduous and riparian sites is consistent with findings obtained in similar studies (Foss & Rieske Reference FOSS and RIESKE2004, Schultz Reference SCHULTZ1992). Two possible ecological interactions may explain the incidence of galling insects and folivores on the same host leaves of the tropical dry deciduous forest. First, massive leaf flushing, at the beginning of the wet season, is a general phenological pattern of the tropical deciduous forests (Bullock & Solís-Magallanes Reference BULLOCK and SOLÍS-MAGALLANES1990, Frankie et al. Reference FRANKIE, BAKER and OPLER1974, Opler et al. Reference OPLER, FRANKIE and BAKER1980) and synchronization of folivores and galling insects to their host phenology is particularly important in the first flush of new leaves of this deciduous forest (Filip et al. Reference FILIP, DIRZO, MAASS and SARUKHÁN1995, Weis et al. Reference WEIS, WALTON and CREGO1988, Yukawa Reference YUKAWA2000). Therefore, it is likely that both folivores and galling insects may directly compete for the same leaf resources but galling insects are better competitors and successfully colonize and displace folivores that would otherwise consume the same leaves. As a result galling insects will competitively exclude folivores. A second explanation is related to the sequestration and induction of host chemical compounds as a result of gall formation assigned to the surrounding host leaf tissue and the gall chamber (Hartley Reference HARTLEY1998, Hartley & Lawton Reference HARTLEY and LAWTON1992). This occurs when galling insects colonize new developing leaves and will indirectly deter folivores through an increase in secondary compounds mediated by galling insect–plant interactions more than the interaction of plants and folivores or folivores and galling insects.

Our results indicate that galling insects may directly affect host plant chemical traits, changing the concentration of foliar phenolics, and indirectly may affect the incidence and leaf-consumption of potential predators such as folivore insects. Schultz (Reference SCHULTZ1992) found that gall induction by several aphids reduce and deter the herbivory of some folivore insects. In this case, galling insects decrease the incidence of folivores. This may have important consequences on the preference of folivorous insects that interact with galling insects in these tropical plant species.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Alfredo Pérez for plant species identification and Nidia Pérez and Gumersindo Sánchez Montoya for technical support and the authorities of Chamela and Cuixmala Biosphere reserve for their permission to conduct this study. This study was partially supported by a scholarship granted by CONACYT and UNAM. Cuevas-Reyes P thanks Programa de Mejoramiento del Profesorado (PROMEP) for their generous support.

References

LITERATURE CITED

ABRAHAMSON, W. G. & WEIS, A. E. 1986. Evolutionary ecology of arthropod gall makers. Pp. 235258 in Slansky, F. & Rodriguez, J. G. (eds.). Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders, and related invertebrates. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
ABRAHAMSON, W. G., MCCREA, K. D., WHITWELL, A. J. & VERNIER, L. A. 1991. The role of phenolic compounds in goldenrod ball resistance and formation. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 19;615622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANANTHAKRISHNAN, T. N. 1984. Adaptative strategies in cecidogenous insects. Pp. 19 in Ananthakrishan, T. N. (ed.). The biology of gall insects. Oxford University Press and IBH, New Delhi.Google Scholar
ASKEW, R. R. 1984. The biology of gall-wasps. Pp. 223271 in Ananthakrishan, T. N. (ed.). The biology of gall insects. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.Google Scholar
BENNET, R. N. & WALLS-GROVE, R. M. 1994. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. New Phytologist 127;617633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIRCH, M. L., BREWER, J. & ROHFRITSCH, O. 1992. Biology of Dasineura affinis (Cecidomyiidae) and influence of its gall on Viola odorata. Pp. 171184 in Shorthouse, J. D. & Rohfritsch, O. (eds.). Biology of insect-induced galls. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
BULLOCK, S. H. 1985. Breeding systems in the flora of tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 4:287301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BULLOCK, S. H. & SOLÍS-MAGALLANES, J. A. 1990. Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 22:2235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CORNELL, H. V. 1983. The secondary chemistry and complex morphology of galls formed by Cynipinae (Hymenoptera): why and how? American Midland Naturalist 110:225234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CUEVAS-REYES, P., SIEBE, C., MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS, M. & OYAMA, K. 2003. Species richness of gall-forming insects in a tropical rain forest: correlations with plant diversity and soil fertility. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:411422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CUEVAS-REYES, P., QUESADA, M., HANSON, P., DIRZO, R. & OYAMA, K. 2004a. Diversity of gall-forming insects in a Mexican tropical dry forest: the importance of plant species richness, life forms, host plant age and plant density. Journal of Ecology 92:707716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CUEVAS-REYES, P., SIEBE, C. & OYAMA, K. 2004b. Spatial patterns of herbivory by gall-forming insects: a test to the soil fertility hypothesis in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Oikos 107:181189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CUEVAS-REYES, P., QUESADA, M. & OYAMA, K. 2006. Abundance and leaf damage caused by gall-inducing insects in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Biotropica 38:107115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DICKE, M. 2000. Chemical ecology of host-plant selection by herbivorous arthropods: a multitrophic perspective. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 28:601617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DREGER-JAUFFRET, J. D. & SHORTHOUSE, J. D. 1992. Diversity of gall-inducing insects and their galls. Pp. 834 in Shorthouse, J. D. & Rohfritsch, O. (eds.). Biology of insect-induced galls. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
FERNANDES, G. W. & PRICE, P. W. 1992. The adaptative significance of insect gall distributions: survivorship of species in xeric and mesic habitats. Oecologia 90:1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FILIP, V., DIRZO, R., MAASS, J. M. & SARUKHÁN, J. 1995. Within-and among-year variation in the levels of herbivory on the foliage of trees from a Mexican tropical deciduous forest. Biotropica 27:7886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FISHER, A. E. I., HARTLEY, S. E. & YOUNG, M. 2000. Direct and indirect competitive effects of foliage feeding guilds on the performance of the birch leaf-miner Eriocrania. Journal of Animal Ecology 69:165176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOSS, L. K. & RIESKE, L. K. 2004. Stem galls affects oak foliage with potential consequences for herbivory. Ecological Entomology 29:273280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRANKIE, G. W., BAKER, H. G. & OPLER, P. A. 1974. Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 62:881899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. 1982. Patterns of Neotropical plant species diversity. Evolutionary Biology 15:154.Google Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. 1988. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75:134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HARBORNE, J. B. 1988. Introduction to ecological biochemistry. Academic Press, London. 243 pp.Google Scholar
HARBORNE, J. B. & GRAYER, R. J. 1993. Flavonoids and insects. Pp. 589618 in Harborne, J. B. (ed.). The flavonoids: advances in research. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HARTLEY, S. E. 1998. The chemical composition of plant galls: are levels of nutrients and secondary compounds controlled by the gall-former. Oecologia 113:492501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HARTLEY, S. E. 1999. Are gall insects large rhizobia? Oikos 84:333342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HARTLEY, S. E. & JONES, C. G. 1997. Plant chemistry and herbivory, or why the world is green. Pp. 284324 in Crawley, M. J. (eds). Plant ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
HARTLEY, S. E. & LAWTON, J. H. 1992. Host-plant manipulation by gall-insects: a test of the nutrition hypothesis. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:113119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARBAN, R. & BALDWIN, I. T. 1997. Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 301 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOLEHMAINEN, J., ROININEN, H., JULKUNEN-TIITTO, R. & TAHVANAINEN, J. 1994. Importance of phenolic glucosides in host selection of shoot galling sawfly, Euura amerinae, on Salix pentandra. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20:24552466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LANGENHEIM, J. H. & STUBBLEBINE, W. H. 1983. Variation in leaf resin between parent tree and progeny in Hymenaea: implications for herbivory in the humid tropics. Biochemical Systematic and Ecology 11:97106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LARSON, K. C. & WHITHAM, T. G. 1991. Manipulation of food resources by a gall-forming aphid: the physiology of sink-source interactions. Oecologia 88:1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LIEBERMAN, D. 1982. Seasonality and phenology in dry tropical forest in Ghana. Journal of Ecology 70:791806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LITTELL, R. C., FREUD, R. J. & SPECTOR, P. H. 1991. SAS system for linear models. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. 329 pp.Google Scholar
LOTT, E., BULLOCK, S. H. & SOLIS-MAGALLANES, J. A. 1987. Floristic diversity and structure of upland and arroyo forest in coastal Jalisco. Biotropica 19:228235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOOPER, S. & SIMBERLOFF, D. 1995. Differential herbivory in an oak population: the role of plant phenology and insect performance. Ecology 76:12331241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NYMAN, T. & JULKUNEN-TITTO, R. 2000. Manipulation of the phenolic chemistry of willows by gall-inducing sawflies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97:1318413187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OPLER, P. A., FRANKIE, G. H. & BAKER, H. G. 1980. Comparative phenological studies of tree let and shrubs species in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Animal Ecology 68:167188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRICE, P. W., ROININEN, H. & TAHVANAINEN, J. 1987. Plant age and attack by the bud galler, Euura mucronata. Oecologia 73:334337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
REICH, P. B. & BORCHERT, R. 1984. Water stress and tree phenology in a tropical dry forest in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 72:6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROININEN, H., PRICE, P. W., JULKUNEN-TIITTO, R., TAHVANAINEN, J. & IKONEN, A. 1999. Oviposition stimulant for a gall-inducing sawfly, Euura lasiolepis, on willow is a phenolic glucoside. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25:943953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RZEDOWSKI, J. 1978. Vegetación de México. Editorial Limusa, México. 432 pp.Google Scholar
SCHULTZ, B. B. 1992. Insect herbivores as potential causes of mortality and adaptation in gall-forming insects. Oecologia 90:297299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHORTHOUSE, J. D. 1986. Significance of nutritive cells in insect galls. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 88:368375.Google Scholar
STONE, G. N. & SCHÖNROGGE, K. 2003. The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:512522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STOKES, M. E., DAVIS, C. S. & KOCH, G. G. 2000. Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. (Second edition). SAS Institute, Cary. 626 pp.Google Scholar
TALLAMY, D. W. & RAUPP, M. J. 1991. Phytochemical induction by herbivores. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 280 pp.Google Scholar
TAPER, M. L. & CASE, T. J. 1987. Interactions between oak tannins and parasite community structure: unexpected benefits of tannins to cynipid gall-wasps. Oecologia 71:254261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TAYLOR, L. R. 1986. Synoptic dynamics, migration and the Rothamsted insect survey. Journal of Animal Ecology 55:138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TJIA, B. & HOUSTON, D. B. 1975. Phenolic constituents of Norway spruce resistant or susceptible to the eastern spruce gall aphid. Forest Science 21:180184.Google Scholar
VEREECKE, D., MESSENS, E., KLARSKOV, K., DE BRUYN, A., VAN MONTAGU, M. & GOETHALS, K. 1997. Patterns of phenolic compounds in leafy galls of tobacco. Planta 201:342348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VAN SCHAIK, C. P., TERBORGH, J. W. & WRIGHT, S. J. 1993. The phenology of tropical forests: adaptive significance and consequences for primary consumers. Annual Review in Ecology and Systematics 24:353377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WARING, G. L. & PRICE, P. W. 1990. Plant water stress and gall formation (Cecidomyiidae: Asphondylia spp.) on creosote bush. Ecological Entomology 15:8795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WATERMAN, P. G. & MOLE, S. 1994. Analysis of phenolic plant metabolites. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. 238 pp.Google Scholar
WEIS, A. E., WALTON, R. & CREGO, C. L. 1988. Reactive plant tissue sites and the population biology of gall makers. Annual Review of Entomology 33:467486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WESTPHAL, E., BRONNER, R. & LE RET, M. 1981. Changes in leaves of susceptible and resistance Solanum dulcamara infested by the gall mite Eriophyes cladophthirus (Acarina, Eriphyoidea). Canadian Journal of Botany 59:875882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YUKAWA, J. 2000. Synchronization of gallers with host plant phenology. Population Ecology 42:105113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZUCKER, W. V. 1982. How aphids choose leaves: the role of phenolics in host selection by a galling aphid. Ecology 63:972981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Galling insect species that occur in both deciduous hillside and riparian sites in the Chamela Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in Jalisco, Mexico.

Figure 1

Table 2. Mean (± SE) total phenol concentration in galled and ungalled leaves of five host plant species that occur in both deciduous hillside and riparian sites.

Figure 2

Table 3. Mean (± SE) frequency of leaves with damage by folivores and proportion of leaf area removed by folivores on leaves with and without galls in host plant species that occur in deciduous hillside and riparian sites.

Figure 3

Table 4. Comparison of the frequency of leaves with damage by folivores and proportion of leaf area removed by folivores on leaves with and without galls between deciduous hillside and riparian sites.