Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T17:17:34.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship between growth behaviour, micro and macroscopic morphologies and freezing sensitivity of the ripening starter Geotrichum candidum is strain specific and mostly related to the morphotypes: the arthrospores/hyphae parameter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2010

Ghalia Missous
Affiliation:
Unité des Microorganismes d'Intérêts Laitier et Alimentaire, IBFA – IFR 146 ICORE, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen cedex, France Laboratoire Départemental F. Duncombe, 1 rte Rosel, 14053 Saint Contest, France
Bouachanh Thammavongs
Affiliation:
Unité des Microorganismes d'Intérêts Laitier et Alimentaire, IBFA – IFR 146 ICORE, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen cedex, France
Géraldine Launay
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Départemental F. Duncombe, 1 rte Rosel, 14053 Saint Contest, France
Micheline Guéguen
Affiliation:
Unité des Microorganismes d'Intérêts Laitier et Alimentaire, IBFA – IFR 146 ICORE, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen cedex, France
Virginie Dieuleveux
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Départemental F. Duncombe, 1 rte Rosel, 14053 Saint Contest, France
Jean-Michel Panoff*
Affiliation:
Unité des Microorganismes d'Intérêts Laitier et Alimentaire, IBFA – IFR 146 ICORE, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen cedex, France Plateau de cryobiologie – IFR 146 ICORE, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen cedex, France.
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: jean-michel.panoff@unicaen.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Microscopic conformation, growth behaviour and freezing sensitivity of seven strains of Geotrichum candidum, a ripening starter, were studied and compared according to their macroscopic morphotypes. It has been shown that the thallus forming units (TFUml−1/OD600nm ratio as a function of time is an interesting parameter to follow G. candidum sporulation through the growth behaviour. Microscopic conformation, growth behaviour and freezing sensitivity are clearly strain specific and mostly related to their corresponding morphotypes “yeast”, “mould” or “intermediate”. The two “mould” strains that sporulate weakly (UCMA103, UCMA499) showed a low survival rate to freezing stress whereas the “yeast” strains expressed a significant resistance owing to the arthrospore abundance. Interestingly, one strain (UCMA96) which appeared on solid medium in accord with the “mould” morphotype respond similarly to freezing stress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2010

Preservation of microorganisms is a main interest in two applied fields: (i) ex situ preservation of microbiodiversity in culture collections and (ii) food starter storage. The processes required in those domains implied specific biotechnologies in order to ensure optimal long-term viability, activity and genetic stability. The main preservation methods for microorganisms, also considered as stresses (Thammavongs et al. Reference Thammavongs, Denou, Missous, Guéguen and Panoff2008), are freezing (Yamasato et al. Reference Yamasato, Okuno and Ohtomo1973; Hubalek Reference Hubalek1996; Thammavongs et al. Reference Thammavongs, Poncet, Desmasures, Guéguen and Panoff2004), freeze-drying (Benedict et al. Reference Benedict, Sharpe, Corman, Meyers, Baer, Hall and Jackson1961; Morgan et al. Reference Morgan, Herman, White and Vesey2006) and spray drying (Corcoran et al. Reference Corcoran, Ross, Fitzgerald and Stanton2004).

Geotrichum candidum, the anamorphic form of Galactomyces candidus (de Hoog & Smith Reference de Hoog and Smith2004), is a filamentous yeast-like fungus with a thallic reproduction (Kirk et al. Reference Kirk, Cannon, David and Stalpers2001). In this microorganism, the asexual spores are called arthrospores and, according to Park & Robinson (Reference Park and Robinson1969), a hyphal tip cell shows three modes of behaviour: somatic growth by extension, cease extension-growth without morphological differentiation, or cease extension-growth and differentiation into arthrospores. This micro-eukaryote, widely used in the dairy industry as a ripening starter, requires a special interest owing to its role in the appearance and the improvement of the organoleptic characteristics of cheeses (Mogensen et al. Reference Mogensen, Salminen, O'Brien, Ouwehand, Holzapfel, Shortt, Fondén, Miller, Donohue, Playne, Crittenden, Bianchi Salvaldori and Zink2002; Wouters et al. Reference Wouters, Ayad, Hugenholtz and Smit2002; Boutrou & Guéguen Reference Boutrou and Guéguen2005), and in the inhibition of growth of pathogenic bacteria and undesirable moulds in the cheese ripening and malting processes (Dieuleveux et al. Reference Dieuleveux, Lemarinier and Guéguen1998; Foszczyńska et al. Reference Foszczyńska, Dziuba and Stempniewicz2004; Molimard et al. Reference Molimard, Buchet and Boivin2005). The G. candidum species present heterogeneity in genetic and phenotypic characteristics (Marcellino et al. Reference Marcellino, Beuvier, Grappin, Guéguen and Benson2001; Gente et al. Reference Gente, Desmasures, Panoff and Guéguen2002; Reference Gente, Sohier, Coton, Duhamel and Guéguen2006). According to literature, the intraspecies morphological diversity on solid medium shows two main morphotypes: “yeast” type strains considered as producing numerous arthrospores and “mould” type strains presumably characterized by preponderance of hyphae and few arthrospores. “Intermediate” type strains have been also described (Guéguen & Schmidt Reference Guéguen, Schmidt, Hermier, Lenoir and Weber1992; Boutrou & Guéguen Reference Boutrou and Guéguen2005).

Although different methods have been proposed for the improvement of fungi (including yeasts) preservation (Espinel-Ingroff et al. Reference Espinel-Ingroff, Montero and Marti-Mazuelos2004; Diogo et al. Reference Diogo, Sarpieri and Pires2005; Borman et al. Reference Borman, Szekely, Campbell and Johnson2006; Homolka et al. Reference Homolka, Lisa, Kubatova, Valqova, Janderova and Nerud2007), the few studies which have explored the preservation of G. candidum are focused on the physiological adaptation of this microorganism to freezing stress by homologous and heterologous mild stress pre-treatment (Thammavongs et al. Reference Thammavongs, Panoff and Guéguen2000; Dubernet et al. Reference Dubernet, Panoff, Thammavongs and Guéguen2002). Recent works have shown that the increase of the nucleation point by adding a biological ice nucleator (SNOMAX®), decrease the freezing lethality of G. candidum (Missous et al. Reference Missous, Thammavongs, Dieuleveux, Guéguen and Panoff2007).

Since the main challenges in fungal cryopreservation are preventing cell loss and physiological modifications, the aim of the present work was to investigate whether significant correlations exist between G. candidum morphotypes and freezing sensitivity, in relation with the arthrospore/hyphae involvement. In Reference Hashimoto and Blumenthal1978, Hashimoto & Blumenthal studied the arthrospores resistance to freezing in the dermatophyte Trichophyton mentagrophytes which is a thallospored fungus as G. candidum. These authors demonstrated that arthrospores are significantly more resistant to freezing than hyphae.

Materials and methods

Strains and culture medium

The strains retained for this study were chosen according to their thallus pattern on solid medium. Their belonging to Geotrichum candidum species as stated by de Hoog & Smith (Reference de Hoog and Smith2004) were confirmed by Gente et al. (Reference Gente, Sohier, Coton, Duhamel and Guéguen2006) with molecular studies. Experiments were performed using seven G. candidum strains (three strains of each main morphotype and one intermediate strain; Table 1, Fig. 1.A) from the laboratory collection (UCMA). Those fungal microorganisms are stored at −80°C as cell suspensions in 15% (v/v) glycerol.

Fig. 1. (A) Thallus of G. candidum on malt extract agar at 25°C during 48 h. (B, C) Photomicrographs of G. candidum cells after 20 h and 48 h respectively, in malt extract broth at 25°C. “Yeast” strains: UCMA 454, UCMA 21 and UCMA 332 (1, 2, and 3, respectively). “Intermediate” strain: UCMA 91 (4). “Mould” strains: UCMA 96, UCMA 499 and UCMA 103 (5, 6 and 7, respectively). Scale bars: A=1 mm, B=100 μm.

Table 1. G. candidum strains used in the present study

Growth experiments in solid or liquid media were carried out with MEA (Malt Extract Agar, AES, Bruz, France) or MEB (Malt Extract Broth, AES) media, respectively (Raper & Thom Reference Raper and Thom1949).

Growth conditions

Cells were spread on agar slope, incubated 48 h at 25°C, and suspended in 3ml 0·9% (w/v) NaCl in order to prepare the preinoculum for further experiments.

To obtain an initial OD600nm=0·05±0·005 (Spectronic 301, Bioblock Scientific, Illkirch, France), 1–3 ml preinoculum were added to 100 ml MEB medium in a 1L Erlenmeyer flask. The liquid culture was incubated at 25°C in the dark with orbital shaking at 150 rpm (AS850, LSL Biolafitte SA, St Germain en Laye, France).

Culture growth was measured simultaneously by spectrophotometry readings at 600 nm and by Thallus Forming Units (TFU) counting (25°C; 48 h). Measurements were performed hourly over at least 48 h for all strains. The TFU/OD ratios are shown in Fig. 3.

Freezing experiments

Cells from 48 h culture (stationary growth phase) were pelleted at 2400 g for 10 min (Eppendorf centrifuge 5810 R, Hamburg, Germany), washed and centrifuged twice (2400 g, 10 min) in 0·9% (w/v) NaCl. Cells were then resuspended in the NaCl solution and adjusted to an OD600nm=1 (±0·05). Suspensions aliquots (1 ml) were then frozen in 1·5 ml Eppendorf microtubes using a Peltier cooler/Heater (PCH-2, Grant-bio, Cambridgeshire, England) set at −10°C. After 24h at −10°C, cell suspensions were sampled, diluted in 0·9% (w/v) NaCl and spread on MEA medium for numeration. Results are the means of three experiments.

Macro and microscopic approaches

Thallus of G. candidum strains were macroscopically observed after 48 h incubation on solid media (MEA) and after 72 h incubation in liquid media (MEB) in test tubes under orbital shaking (120 rpm) at 25°C. The microscopic observations were performed using a microscope (Leika, DMLB, Germany) coupled with a video camera (Linkam Scientific Instruments Ltd., UK) after 20, 48 and 72 h growth in MEB at 25°C.

Results and Discussion

Macroscopic and microscopic observations

Fig. 1 shows thallus morphological characteristics (A) of the strains and corresponding microscopic observations (C). As described in the literature (Guéguen & Jacquet Reference Guéguen and Jacquet1982; de Hoog et al. Reference de Hoog, Smith and Guého1986; Boutrou & Guéguen Reference Boutrou and Guéguen2005), the strains used in this study exhibit two thallus patterns, and thus are regarded as two different morphotypes: (i) “yeast” type (UCMA 454, 21 and 332), characterized by cream coloured colonies with a greasy aspect (Fig. 1.A1, 1.A2 and 1.A3) and (ii) “mould” type (UCMA 96, 499 and 103), showing white felting colonies forming filaments (Fig. 1.A5, 1.A6 and 1.A7). Strain UCMA 91 which shows characteristics between the types described above is considered as “Intermediate” (Fig. 1.A4).

In the micro-fungus G. candidum, hyphae are composed of vegetative cells which can differentiate into arthrospores (de Hoog & Smith Reference de Hoog and Smith2004). According to Guéguen & Schmidt (Reference Guéguen, Schmidt, Hermier, Lenoir and Weber1992) the intra species diversity which is currently associated with the variability of the macroscopic morphotypes, is related to this differentiation phenomenon. The expectation was to find a relationship between thallus patterns and microscopic observations. The three “yeast” strains show an important predominance of arthrospores (Fig. 1.C1, 1.C2 and 1.C3) whereas the “mould” strains UCMA 499 and 103 exhibit an abundance of hyphae (Fig. 1.C6, 1.C7). The “intermediate” strain UCMA 91 shows microscopic pattern similar to those of the “yeast” strains (Fig. 1.C4). Interestingly, the “mould” strain UCMA 96 appears with relatively equal parts of arthrospores and hyphae (Fig. 1.C5). According to these results, the relationship between macroscopic aspect and arthrospore/hyphae ratio, which has been proposed by Guéguen & Jacquet (Reference Guéguen and Jacquet1982), remains questionable. Two hypotheses might be proposed: (i) there is not a systematic correlation between the macroscopic morphotypes of G. candidum and the corresponding arthrospores/hyphae ratio; (ii) the macro and microscopic aspects are partially related to the culture media (solid or liquid).

Aspects of G. candidum strains in liquid cultures are clearly distinct (Fig. 2). The “mould” strains cultures are divided in two parts: the main one as a thick crust at the surface of the broth, and the other one, slight and cloudy at the bottom (Fig. 2.C). In parallel, the “yeast” strains cultures present an important cloudy bottom as single part (Fig. 2.A). Interestingly, the “mould” strain UCMA 96 shows an important cloudy bottom (data not shown).

Fig. 2. Different aspects of cultures on Malt Extract Broth at 25°C during 72 h of three G. candidum strains [“yeast” strain UCMA 21, “intermediate” strain UCMA 91 and “mould” strain UCMA 499 (A, B and C, respectively)] and corresponding microscopic observations (1, 2 and 3).

As shown through Fig. 2 corresponding to the “yeast” strain UCMA 21 (Fig. 2.A) and the “mould” strain UCMA 499 (Fig. 2.C), microscopic observations revealed that cloudy bottoms of all studied strains cultures correspond to arthrospores (Fig. 2.1 & 2.3) whereas the surface of the mould strains cultures correspond to hyphae (Fig. 2.2).

The macroscopic differences between “yeast” and “mould” strains, in liquid media, reflect the predominant morphological form (arthrospore or hyphae) in each cell suspension, since arthrospores constitute dense and cloudy bottoms unlike the hyphae which compose solid crust at the surfaces, probably owing to low density. Densities of the different fractions have not been measured. These observations which permit determination of the predominant morphological form, support the second hypothesis that macro and microscopic aspects of G. candidum are partially related to solid or liquid culture media.

Growth behaviour

G. candidum growth behaviour was studied by following the evolution of the TFU×ml −1/OD 600nm ratio as a function of time (h). This ratio involves two factors that characterize the microbial growth: (i) The Optical Density (OD) which is representative of the biomass evolution, and, (ii) the number of TFU which is partially (temporally and quantitatively) related to the sporulation ability. The growth curves of the “yeast” strains (Fig. 3.a, b & c) are characterized by a triphasic structure: initially, the ratio TFU×ml −1/OD 600nm decrease regularly owing to the increase of the biomass. The second phase corresponds to the increase of the ratio consequently to the TFU/ml increase. The last phase shows a decrease (Fig. 3.a & b) or a relative stabilization (Fig. 3.c) of the TFU×ml −1/OD 600nm ratio, according to the strains. Except for UCMA 96 (Fig. 3.e), the growth curves of the “mould” strains are characterized by an irregular monophasic structure (Fig. 3.f & g).

Fig. 3. Growth behaviour of G. candidum strains expressed by the TFU×ml −1/OD 600nm ratio as a function of time in hours (t/h), cultured in liquid MEB medium. Data for each strain correspond to 3 replicates (square, circle and triangle) of 2 complementary experiments (open and closed symbols). “Yeast” strains: UCMA 454, 21 and 332 (a, b and c, respectively). “Intermediate” strain: UCMA 91 (d). “Mould” strains: UCMA 96, 499 and 103 (e, f and g, respectively).

In the triphasic curves of the “yeast” strains, the initial decrease of the TFU×ml −1/OD 600nm ratio corresponds to the germination of the arthrospores (initial inoculum) followed by the filaments elongation which leads to the biomass increase (Guéguen & Jacquet Reference Guéguen and Jacquet1982). At the second phase, the ratio TFU×ml −1/OD 600nm increase corresponds to the release of the sporulation by cellular differentiation of the vegetative cells to arthrospores (Fig. 1.B1, 1.B2 and 1.B3) which initiate the TFU/ml increase. Thus, the decrease/stabilization of the ratio TFU×ml −1/OD 600nm at the third phase corresponds to the germination of the arthrospores generated during the previous phase.

In the monophasic curves of “mould” strains UCMA 499 and UCMA 103, the low amplitude of the TFU×ml −1/OD 600nm ratio could be related to an undefined sporulation phase (Fig. 1.B6 & 1.B7). Since sporulation of the hyphae occurs concomitantly with elongation, the TFU×ml −1/OD 600nm ratio remains relatively constant.

The strain UCMA 91, with an “intermediate” colonial pattern (Fig. 1.A4), shows growth curve (Fig. 3.d) similar to that of the “yeast” strains which is in accordance with its microscopic aspect (Fig. 1.B4).

Interestingly, the strain UCMA 96 which has a macroscopic aspect (Fig. 1.A5) in accord with the “mould” morphotype unlike its microscopic characteristics (Fig. 1.B5), shows a growth curve similar to that of the “yeast” strains (Fig. 3.e).

Freezing sensitivity

The freezing sensitivity of the different G. candidum strains studied was evaluated by cell numeration after exposure at −10°C for 24 h of cell suspensions initially adjusted to an OD600nm=1±0·05. TFU/ml values obtained in these control conditions (Table 2) are significantly different. The “yeast” strains values are higher than 3·1×106 TFU/ml, while those corresponding to the “mould” strains are less than 2·2×106 TFU/ml. Interestingly, since the suspensions were adjusted as described above, these results show that production of arthrospores is more important in the yeast strains compared with the mould strains.

Table 2. Cell concentrations of G. candidum suspensions before [Control (TFU/ml); O.D.600nm=1] and after frozen [Survival (TFU/ml and %)]

The freezing survival evaluated by numeration showed a global decrease of the TFU/ml values (Table 2).

The relative freezing sensitivity was evaluated by the survival rate values (%). Interestingly the classification based on these values does not match with the previous ones. Depending on the strains, the survival rate is comprised between 13·7 and 75·3%. Except for the “mould” strain UCMA 96, strains could be still gathered into the groups described previously, with values higher than 51% for the “yeast” strains, and lower than 19% for the “mould” strains.

The research described in this article was developed on the hypothesis that the different macroscopic morphotypes observed within the species G. candidum are correlated with the freezing sensitivity. Our results support clearly this hypothesis on liquid medium and partially on solid medium. The yeast strains are significantly more resistant to freezing stress (−10°C) than the mould strains UCMA 103 and UCMA 499. It has been reported that in the dermatophyte fungus Trichophyton mentagrophytes, the arthrospores are more resistant to freezing than the hyphae (Hashimoto & Blumenthal Reference Hashimoto and Blumenthal1978). This is in accord with our microscopic observations which show an arthrospores predominance in yeast strains suspensions of G. candidum. Interestingly, freezing sensitivity of the “mould” strain UCMA96 is relatively low. Nevertheless, this is in accord with the microscopic aspect of this strain which show numerous arthrospores compared with the mould strains UCMA 103 and UCMA 499. The arthrospores predominance and the growth behaviour of the intermediate strain UCMA 91 are in accord with the high resistance to freezing stress and thus corroborate the link between the arthrospores proportions of the strains and the freezing sensitivity.

Depending on culture conditions and environmental factors, two types of arthrospores, cylindrical and ellipsoidal, have been described in G. candidum (Carmichael Reference Carmichael1957; Butler Reference Butler1960; Trinci & Collinge Reference Trinci and Collinge1974; Kier et al. Reference Kier, Allermann, Floto, Olsen and Sortkjaer1976; Quinn et al. Reference Quinn, Patton and Marchant1981; de Hoog et al. Reference de Hoog, Smith and Guého1986). In our study, only ellipsoidal arthrospores have been observed. These arthrospores contain more carbohydrates and fewer proteins than the corresponding mycelium (Allermann et al. Reference Allermann, Floto, Olsen, Sortkjær and Kier1978). In addition, arthrospores walls are two fold thicker than the hyphae walls (unpublished data). This is in accord with the results obtained by Steele & Fraser (Reference Steele and Fraser1973). Thus, the freezing sensitivity of G. candidum seems to be related to the sporulation level.

In conclusion, freezing resistance must be related to specific metabolic characteristics in arthrospores that are insignificant or missing in hyphae. Induction of arthrospores differentiation (Hoff et al. Reference Hoff, Schmitt and Kück2005) could be considered as a tool to optimise freezing preservation of fungal starters used in dairy industry such as G. candidum.

Microscopic aspects, growth behaviour and freezing resistance of the studied strains are closely correlated and aid discussion of the validity of the macroscopic discrimination of the “yeast”, “mould” and “intermediate” morphotypes usually described in G. candidum: The three morphotypes could be regarded as integral parts of a single continuum, or else, only both extreme morphotypes (yeast and mould) would have a real and determined physiological existence. Under these conditions, the definition of morphotype in G. candidum remains questionable and has to consider the macroscopic aspect on liquid medium.

G. candidum is a relevant food micro-eukaryote model to study the strain specific variability of the freezing stress response related to the differentiation phenomenon and to improve the cryopreservation process. In this context, studies of the proteomic expression of G. candidum submitted to cold stress using 2D-DIGE technology are in progress.

This project was supported by the “Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche”, the “Conseil Régional de Basse-Normandie” and the ”Conseil Général du Calvados”.

References

Allermann, K, Floto, F, Olsen, J, Sortkjær, O & Kier, I 1978 Sporulation and the Macromolecular Composition of the Mycelium and Arthrospores of Geotrichum candidum. Physiologia Plantarum 42 355358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, RG, Sharpe, ES, Corman, J, Meyers, GB, Baer, EF, Hall, HH & Jackson, RW 1961 Preservation of Microorganisms by Freeze-drying: II. The Destructive Action of Oxygen. Additional Stabilizers for Serratia marcescens. Experiments with Other Microorganisms. Journal of Applied Microbiology 9 256262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borman, AM, Szekely, A, Campbell, CK & Johnson, EM 2006 Evaluation of the viability of pathogenic filamentous fungi after prolonged storage in sterile water and review of recent published studies on storage methods. Mycopathologia 161 361368CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boutrou, R & Guéguen, M 2005 Interests in Geotrichum candidum for cheese technology. International Journal Food Microbiology 102 120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, EE 1960 Pathogenicity and taxonomy of Geotrichum candidum. Phytopathology 50 665672Google Scholar
Carmichael, JW 1957 Geotrichum candidum. Mycologia 49 820830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, BM, Ross, RP, Fitzgerald, GF & Stanton, C 2004 Comparative survival of probiotic lactobacilli spray-dried in the presence of prebiotic substances. Journal of Applied Microbiology 96 10241039CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Hoog, GS & Smith, MT 2004 Ribosomal gene phylogeny and species delimitation in Geotrichum and its teleomorphs. Studies in Mycology 50 489515Google Scholar
de Hoog, GS, Smith, MT & Guého, E 1986 A revision of the genus Geotrichum and its teleomorphs. Studies in Mycology 29 1131Google Scholar
Dieuleveux, V, Lemarinier, S & Guéguen, M 1998 Antimicrobial spectrum and target site of D-3-phenyllactic acid. International Journal of Food Microbiology 40 177183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diogo, HC, Sarpieri, A & Pires, MC 2005 Fungi preservation in distilled water. Anais. Brasileiros de Dermatologia 80 591594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubernet, S, Panoff, JM, Thammavongs, B & Guéguen, M 2002 Nystatin and osmotica as chemicals enhancers of the phenotypic adaptation to freeze-thaw stress in Geotrichum candidum ATCC 204307. International Journal of Food Microbiology 76 215221CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espinel-Ingroff, A, Montero, D & Marti-Mazuelos, E 2004 Long-term preservation of fungal isolates in commercially prepared cryogenic Microbank vials. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42 12571259CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foszczyńska, B, Dziuba, E & Stempniewicz, R 2004 The use of Geotrichum candidum starter culture for protection of barley and its influence on biotechnological qualities of malts. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities 7 Issue 2Google Scholar
Gente, S, Desmasures, N, Panoff, JM & Guéguen, M 2002 Genetic diversity among Geotrichum candidum strains from various substrates studied using RAM and RAPD-PCR. Journal of Applied Microbiology 92 491501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gente, S, Sohier, D, Coton, E, Duhamel, C & Guéguen, M 2006 Identification of Geotrichum candidum at the species and strain level: proposal for a standardized protocol. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 33 10191031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guéguen, M & Jacquet, J 1982 Etudes sur les caractères culturaux et la morphologie de Geotrichum candidum link. Le Lait 62 625644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guéguen, M & Schmidt, JL 1992 Levures and Geotrichum. In: Hermier, J, Lenoir, J, Weber, F (eds), Les groupes microbiens d'intérêt laitier. CEPIL, Paris165220Google Scholar
Hashimoto, T & Blumenthal, HJ 1978 Survival and resistance of Trichophyton mentagrophytes arthrospores. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 35 274277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, B, Schmitt, EK & Kück, U 2005 CPCR1, but not its interacting transcription factor AcFKH1, controls fungal arthrospore formation in Acremonium chrysogenum. Molecular Microbiology 56 12201233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homolka, L, Lisa, L, Kubatova, A, Valqova, M, Janderova, B & Nerud, F 2007 Cryopreservation of filamentous micromycetes and yeasts using perlite. Folia Microbiologica 52 153157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubalek, Z 1996 Cryopreservation of microorganisms, at ultra-low temperatures. Acadamia praha, PragueGoogle Scholar
Kier, I, Allermann, K, Floto, F, Olsen, J & Sortkjaer, O 1976 Changes of exponential growth rates in relation to differentiation of Geotrichum candidum in submerged culture. Physiologia Plantarum 38 6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, PM, Cannon, PF, David, JC & Stalpers, JA 2001 Dictionary of the fungi (9th ed.) Cabi publishing. Surrey, UKGoogle Scholar
Marcellino, N, Beuvier, E, Grappin, R, Guéguen, M & Benson, DR 2001 Diversity of Geotrichum candidum strains isolated from traditional cheesemaking fabrications in France. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67 47524759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Missous, G, Thammavongs, B, Dieuleveux, V, Guéguen, M & Panoff, JM 2007 Improvement of the cryopreservation of the fungal starter Geotrichum candidum by artificial nucleation and temperature downshift control. Cryobiology 55 6671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mogensen, G, Salminen, S, O'Brien, J, Ouwehand, A, Holzapfel, W, Shortt, C, Fondén, R, Miller, GD, Donohue, D, Playne, M, Crittenden, R, Bianchi Salvaldori, B & Zink, R 2002 Inventory of microorganisms with a documented history of use in food. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 377 1019Google Scholar
Molimard, P, Buchet, C & Boivin, P 2005 Use of Geotrichum candidum starters during the malting process for malt bioprotection. 30th EBC congress, PragueGoogle Scholar
Morgan, CA, Herman, N, White, PA & Vesey, G 2006 Preservation of micro-organisms by drying; A review. Journal of Microbiological Methods 66 183193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, D & Robinson, PM 1969 Germination studies with Geotrichum candidum. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 52 213222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, JP, Patton, AM & Marchant, R 1981 Sporulation of Geotrichum candidum in submerged culture. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 77 627635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raper, KB & Thom, C 1949 A Manual of the Penicillia, The Williams and Wilkins Company, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
Steele, SD & Fraser, TW 1973 Ultrastructural xchanges during germination of Geotrichum candidum arthrospores. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 19 10311034CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thammavongs, B, Denou, E, Missous, G, Guéguen, M & Panoff, JM 2008 Response to environmental stress as a global phenomenon in biology: The example of microorganisms. Microbes and Environnements 23 2023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thammavongs, B, Panoff, JM & Guéguen, M 2000 Phenotypic adaptation to freeze-thaw stress of the yeast-like fungus Geotrichum candidum. International Journal of Food Microbiology 60 99–105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thammavongs, B, Poncet, JM, Desmasures, N, Guéguen, M & Panoff, JM 2004 Resin straw as an alternative system to securely store frozen microorganisms. Journal of Microbiological Methods 57 181186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trinci, APJ & Collinge, AJ 1974 Spore formation in nitrogen and carbon starved cultures of Geotrichum candidum and Mucor racemosus. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 62 351358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouters, JTM, Ayad, EHE, Hugenholtz, J & Smit, G 2002 Microbes from raw milk for fermented dairy products. International Dairy Journal 12 91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamasato, K, Okuno, D & Ohtomo, T 1973 Preservation of bacteria by freezing at moderately low temperatures. Cryobiology 10 453463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (A) Thallus of G. candidum on malt extract agar at 25°C during 48 h. (B, C) Photomicrographs of G. candidum cells after 20 h and 48 h respectively, in malt extract broth at 25°C. “Yeast” strains: UCMA 454, UCMA 21 and UCMA 332 (1, 2, and 3, respectively). “Intermediate” strain: UCMA 91 (4). “Mould” strains: UCMA 96, UCMA 499 and UCMA 103 (5, 6 and 7, respectively). Scale bars: A=1 mm, B=100 μm.

Figure 1

Table 1. G. candidum strains used in the present study

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Different aspects of cultures on Malt Extract Broth at 25°C during 72 h of three G. candidum strains [“yeast” strain UCMA 21, “intermediate” strain UCMA 91 and “mould” strain UCMA 499 (A, B and C, respectively)] and corresponding microscopic observations (1, 2 and 3).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Growth behaviour of G. candidum strains expressed by the TFU×ml−1/OD600nm ratio as a function of time in hours (t/h), cultured in liquid MEB medium. Data for each strain correspond to 3 replicates (square, circle and triangle) of 2 complementary experiments (open and closed symbols). “Yeast” strains: UCMA 454, 21 and 332 (a, b and c, respectively). “Intermediate” strain: UCMA 91 (d). “Mould” strains: UCMA 96, 499 and 103 (e, f and g, respectively).

Figure 4

Table 2. Cell concentrations of G. candidum suspensions before [Control (TFU/ml); O.D.600nm=1] and after frozen [Survival (TFU/ml and %)]