Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-09T20:55:22.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mitochondria during sea urchin oogenesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2017

Maria Agnello*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, Palermo 90128, Italy.
Maria Carmela Roccheri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Giovanni Morici
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Anna Maria Rinaldi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
*
All correspondence to: Maria Agnello. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, Palermo 90128, Italy. Tel: +39 091 238 97 419. Fax: +39 091 65 77 210. E-mail: maria.agnello@unipa.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sea urchin represents an ideal model for studies on fertilization and early development, but the achievement of egg competence and mitochondrial behaviour during oogenesis remain to be enlightened. Oocytes of echinoid, such as sea urchin, unlike other echinoderms and other systems, complete meiotic maturation before fertilization. Mitochondria, the powerhouse of eukaryotic cells, contain a multi-copy of the maternally inherited genome, and are involved directly at several levels in the reproductive processes, as their functional status influences the quality of oocytes and contributes to fertilization and embryogenesis. In the present paper, we report our latest data on mitochondrial distribution, content and activity during Paracentrotus lividus oogenesis. The analyses were carried out using confocal microscopy, in vivo incubating oocytes at different maturation stages with specific probes for mitochondria and mtDNA, and by immunodetection of Hsp56, a well known mitochondrial marker. Results show a parallel rise of mitochondrial mass and activity, and, especially in the larger oocytes, close to germinal vesicle (GV) breakdown, a considerable increase in organelle activity around the GV, undoubtedly for an energetic aim. In the mature eggs, mitochondrial activity decreases, in agreement with their basal metabolism. Further and significant information was achieved by studying the mitochondrial chaperonin Hsp56 and mtDNA. Results show a high increase of both Hsp56 and mtDNA. Taken together these results demonstrate that during oogenesis a parallel rise of different mitochondrial parameters, such as mass, activity, Hsp56 and mtDNA occurs, highlighting important tools in the establishment of developmental competence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles, frequently dividing and fusing, changing size and shape and travelling long distances throughout cell life.

Their number, structure and functions differ in different animal cells and tissues in relation to their energy needs (Yaffe, Reference Yaffe1999; Nagata, Reference Nagata2006). As the energy needs of cells can vary during development, differentiation, and in response to physiological or environmental alterations (Pollak and Sutton Reference Pollak and Sutton1980; Cuezva et al., Reference Cuezva, Ostronoff, Ricart, López de Heredia, Di Liegro and Izquierdo1997; Enríquez et al., Reference Enríquez, Fernández-Silva, Garrido-Pérez, López-Pérez, Pérez-Martos and Montoya1999), the number of organelles can vary throughout complex processes (Goffart & Wiesner Reference Goffart and Wiesner2003; Hood, Reference Hood2001; Klingenspor et al., Reference Klingenspor, Ivemeyer, Wiesinger, Haas, Heldmaier and Wiesner1996).

Oogenesis in most echinoderms is asynchronous so that each ovary lobe may contain hundreds of oocytes at different maturation stages. To begin with, the sea urchin oocyte is about 10 µm; during the vitellogenic phase, it grows becoming 80−100 µm. A mature oocyte appears with its large nucleus, the germinal vesicle (GV), containing a prominent nucleolus (Wessel et al., Reference Wessel, Berg and Conner2004a). The first indication of meiotic resumption is the migration of GV to a peripheral location at the animal pole. At the end of maturation the GV breaks down (GVBD) (Berg & Wessel, Reference Berg and Wessel1997).

Echinoid and Holothurian oocytes achieve meiotic maturation before fertilization, in a different way than other echinoderms or other systems. The eggs can be stored before spawning within the ovaries for several weeks or even months (Wessel et al., Reference Wessel, Voronina and Brooks2004b).

It is well known that mitochondria play, in eukaryotic cells, a primary role in cellular energetic metabolism, homeostasis and death and are directly involved at several levels in the reproductive processes. The quality of oocytes and eggs, the fertilization process, as well as the embryonic development are influenced by the functional status of mitochondria (May-Panloup et al., Reference May-Panloup, Chretien, Malthiery and Reynier2007).

During oogenesis in many animals, including Drosophila melanogaster, Danio rerio, Xenopus laevis, mouse, pig and human, mitochondrial morphology, quantity, subcellular localization, and aggregation change (Schnapp et al., Reference Schnapp, Arn, Deshler and Highet1997; Barritt et al., Reference Barritt, Brenner, Cohen and Matt1999; Perez et al., Reference Perez, Trbovich, Gosgen and Tilly2000; Sun et al., Reference Sun, Wu, Lai, Park, Cabot, Cheong, Day, Prather and Schatten2001; Wilding et al., Reference Wilding, Carotenuto, Infante, Dale, Marino, Di Matteo and Campanella2001a,b; Barritt et al., Reference Barritt, Kokot, Cohen, Steuerwald and Brenner2002; Van Blerkom et al., Reference Van Blerkom, Davis, Mathwig and Alexander2002; Nishi et al., Reference Nishi, Takeshita, Stato and Araki2003; Chang et al., Reference Chang, Torres, Lewis, Mowry, Houliston and King2004; Torner et al., Reference Torner, Brüssow, Alm, Ratky, Pöhland, Tuchscherer and Kanitz2004; Cao et al., Reference Cao, Shitara, Horii, Nagao, Imai, Abe, Hara, Hayashi and Yonekawa2007; Dumollard et al., Reference Dumollard, Duchen and Duchen2007).

A peculiar distribution of mitochondria has been reported in D. rerio oocytes at vegetal and animal poles, probably as a result of differences in energy requirement, while active organelles are distributed in all sublocations and undergo fast dynamic movements (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Ouyang, Hou, Schatten, Chen and Sun2008). A comparative study of female gametes of D. melanogaster and D. rerio, species highly evolutionarily distant, showed suppressed mitochondrial metabolism, probably due to increase in the fidelity of mitochondrial DNA inheritance (de Paula et al., Reference de Paula, Agip, Missirlis, Ashworth, Vizcay-Barrena, Lucas and Allen2013).

A recent study on Drosophila and Xenopus oocytes revealed an important link between metabolism and oocyte maturation, suggesting the existence of an evolutionarily conserved mechanism. In both species, mitochondria of mature oocytes reach a state of respiratory quiescence by remodelling the electron transport chain, thus accumulating during late oogenesis an extensive amount of glycogen, required for the developmental competence of the oocyte (Sieber et al., Reference Sieber, Thomsen and Spradling2016).

During sea urchin oogenesis, mitochondria are synthesized and accumulated in very high numbers: mitochondrial proliferation and massive amplification of mtDNA take place. Mature eggs indeed contain many thousands of organelles, which are distributed to the daughter cells after fertilization. Maternal mitochondria are able to support development up to the larva stage, without new synthesis of mitochondrial DNA or production of new mitochondria (Matsumoto et al., Reference Matsumoto, Kasamatsu, Pikó and Vinograd1974; Bresch, Reference Bresch1978; Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi, De Leo, Arzone, Salcher, Storace and Mutolo1979a,Reference Rinaldi, Salcher-Cillari and Mutolob). After fertilization, the respiratory rate of sea urchin embryos increases, then decreases, keeping quite constant up to blastula, and slightly increasing after hatching, it reaches the maximum value at the gastrula stage and then this is maintained at a high level up to pluteus (Giudice, Reference Giudice1985; Fujiwara & Yasumasu, Reference Fujiwara and Yasumasu1997).

We have demonstrated previously that during sea urchin embryogenesis the mitochondrial mass does not change, while mitochondrial respiration increases (Morici et al., Reference Morici, Agnello, Spagnolo, Roccheri, Di Liegro and Rinaldi2007). Mitochondria consume oxygen at low levels before fertilization, but soon after this step the oxidative activity increases probably because fertilization induces the activation of metabolism in order to guarantee cell duplications, requiring a high energy support supplied by mitochondria (Agnello et al., Reference Agnello, Morici and Rinaldi2008). A useful mitochondrial marker is represented by the Hsp56 protein, a homologue to Hsp60 chaperonin and located in the organelle matrix (Roccheri et al., Reference Roccheri, Bosco, Ristuccia, Cascino, Giudice, Oliva and Rinaldi1997). In the P. lividus embryos genome, the existence of the gene encoding mitochondrial Hsp60 has been demonstrated constitutively expressed and heat-shock inducible, and some proteins that are able to bind Hsp56 mRNA, possibly regulating its localization, have been detected (Gianguzza et al., Reference Gianguzza, Ragusa, Roccheri, Di Liegro and Rinaldi2000; Roccheri et al., Reference Roccheri, Patti, Agnello, Gianguzza, Carra and Rinaldi2001; Di Liegro & Rinaldi, Reference Di Liegro and Rinaldi2007; Di Liegro et al., Reference Di Liegro, Agnello, Casano, Roccheri, Gianguzza and Rinaldi2008).

The exact situation of mitochondria during oogenesis is to date obscure and current knowledge of these organelles needs further improvement. In the present paper we studied mitochondrial mass, distribution, and oxidative activity during oogenesis of P. lividus, by applying CLSM imaging technologies. We incubated oocytes in vivo at different growth stages with cell-permeant probes specific for mitochondria, in order to measure mitochondrial membranes and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) activity. The mtDNA content was studied by incubating in vivo with the PicoGreen dsDNA probe. The levels and distribution of constitutive Hsp56 were investigated by immunofluorescence.

Materials and methods

Oocyte collection

P. lividus adults were collected in the west coast of Sicily and oocytes were obtained from the gonads by a slightly modified routine method (Giudice et al., Reference Giudice, Sconzo, Bono and Albanese1972). Ovaries from 10 adult females were excised and gently stirred in Millipore-filtered sea water (MFSW) in order to remove the bulk of mature eggs. Released eggs were removed and the gonads washed three times by suspension in sea water and a further four additional times in Ca- and Mg-MFSW. Gonads were then suspended in 100 ml of Ca- and Mg-free sea water containing 100 mg of pronase (Boehringer Mannheim, cat. no. 165921) and gently stirred by means of a magnetic stirrer spinning at 25°C. After 45 min the ovary suspension was filtered through a mesh filter of 75 µm of diameter and filtered oocytes sedimented at 500 g for 30 s and washed twice by re-suspending and centrifuging at the same speed. Sedimented oocytes (about 1.2 ml) were finally suspended in 10 ml of MFSW. This suspension contained contemporarily all sizes of the oocytes.

In vivo incubation with mitochondrial fluorescent probes

Next, 200 nM (f.c.) of MTG (FM M-7514) and 100 nM (f.c.) of MTO CM-H2 (TMROS M-7511, Molecular Probes) were added to a suspension of oocytes and eggs. After 60 min of incubation at 18°C in a dark room, in rotation, the samples were washed several times with MFSW and fixed with 0.1% formaldehyde in sea water–Tris−HCl pH 8.0. After incubation with the fluorochromes, an aliquot of embryo suspension was treated for 30 min with 100 μg (f.c.) oligomycin, an inhibitor of ATP synthase (complex V of OXPHOS) and used as the control.

mtDNA staining in living oocytes and eggs was achieved by diluting stock PicoGreen dsDNA solution (Molecular Probes, P7589) at 3 µl/ml directly into cell culture medium, for 1 h at 18°C in a dark room, in rotation. Then the samples were washed several times with MFSW and fixed with 0.1% formaldehyde in sea water−Tris−HCl pH 8.0. Controls were pre-treated with DNase, 10 µg/ml, incubated with PicoGreen dsDNA, and then fixed as previously described.

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence was performed on whole-mount oocytes and eggs fixed, as previously described by Kiyomoto et al. (Reference Kiyomoto, Zito, Costa, Poma, Sciarrino and Matranga2007). Subsequently, each sample was incubated for 1 h at room temperature in blocking solution: 0.5% albumin from bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, A7906) and 5% heat inactivated goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich, G9023) in PBS-T (phosphate-buffered saline, 0.1% Tween 20) and overnight at 4°C with anti-Hsp60 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, H 3524), diluted 1:250, in blocking solution. In the negative controls, the primary antibody was omitted. Samples were mounted on glass in 80% glycerol/PBS-T. The observations were performed by CLSM, under a ×60 oil immersion lens.

Microscopic observations

Fifty samples were chosen from 1000s of oocytes and eggs observed, and analysed under CLSM (Olympus FV-300) equipped with argon (488 nm) and helium/neon (543 nm) lasers. Each sample was scanned in layers 3 μm thick, with a PlanApo 60X/1, 40 oil-immersion lenses at 1024 × 1024 pixel resolution. Specimens pre-incubated with MTG absorb laser light at 490 nm wavelength, emitting green fluorescent light at 516 nm; specimens pre-incubated with PicoGreen dsDNA absorb laser light at 485 nm wavelength, emitting green fluorescent light at 530 nm; specimens pre-incubated with MTO absorb laser light at 551 nm emitting red fluorescent light at 576 nm wavelength.

Image acquisition and analysis

The CSLM fluorescence was revealed by photomultiplier tubes at 256 grey levels. As the acquisition software (Olympus Fluoview v.3.3) links a different colour to each channel, green for MTG and PicoGreen dsDNA and red for MTO, we adopted the 8-bit values full range (0–255) with a linear Look up Table (LUT) in order to compare both colours. The images were analysed, measured and processed by the ImageJ software, a public domain Java Image processing programme. The data obtained were elaborated by Microsoft Excel™.

In the negative control images acquisition was performed measuring the intensity of auto-fluorescence. This value became the threshold level for the capture of other samples.

For the specimens incubated with PicoGreen dsDNA, because of the ability of this probe to bind both mtDNA, and nuclear DNA, the analysis of mitochondrial fluorescent signals was performed by subtracting the fluorescence of the nucleus from the total green intensity values for all analysed sections.

Results

Detection of mitochondrial mass and activity

Mass, distribution and OXPHOS activity of mitochondria during P. lividus oogenesis, were studied by incubating oocytes in vivo with cell-permeant probes specific for mitochondria, MitoTraker green (MTG) and orange (MTO), and analysed by CLSM.

MTG represents a very useful tool for determining the mitochondrial mass and MTO allows the evaluation of mitochondrial oxidative activity (Morici et al., Reference Morici, Agnello, Spagnolo, Roccheri, Di Liegro and Rinaldi2007, Agnello et al., Reference Agnello, Morici and Rinaldi2008). Incubation with both fluorochromes allowed us to simultaneously measure and study the co-localization of both signals.

The oocytes and eggs were grouped into seven classes: 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm, and mature egg (90 µm), on the basis of diameter (Fig. 1). Microscopic observations were performed by capturing 2 µm thick layers of specimens, the number of captured sections depending on the different size of each sample. We analysed and processed 20 specimens for each stage, measuring the intensity values of fluorescent signals by densitometry. Results of MTG incubation showed that green fluorescence was more concentrated in some cytoplasmic regions of small oocytes (20/40 µm), and dispersed in the larger oocytes (60/90 µm). Red fluorescence, due to mitochondrial activity, was quite low in the smaller oocytes, while it was considerably increased in the larger oocytes, where it appeared to be localized mainly around the germinal vesicle, and fluorescence merge tended towards the red. In the mature eggs, red and green fluorescences were quite uniformly distributed and oxygen consumption decreased in comparison with the 90 µm oocyte, probably because basal metabolism, typical of unfertilized eggs, was achieved. As previously demonstrated (Agnello et al., Reference Agnello, Morici and Rinaldi2008), in the zygote, 20 min after fertilization, the mitochondrial population was more active than in unfertilized eggs and the resulting colour tended to red (Fig. 1 h 3). A treatment with oligomycin, an inhibitor of ATP synthase (complex V of OXPHOS), was used as the control (Fig. 1 h 2, h3).

Figure 1 In vivo incubation with MTG and MTO: equatorial optical sections of representative oocytes, at different sizes, and mature eggs, captured by CLSM. In green: the mitochondria population stained with MTG. In red: active mitochondria stained with MTO. Bottom: merge of green and red fluorescence. (a1–a3): 20 µm oocytes; (b1–b3): 30 µm oocytes; (c1–c3): 40 µm oocytes; (d1–d3): 60 µm oocytes; (e1–e3): 80 µm oocytes; (f1–f3): 90 µm oocytes; (g1–g3): 90 µm mature egg; (h1, h2): negative controls after oligomycin incubation; (h3): merge of MTG and MTO signals in the zygote, 20 min after fertilization. Bar represents 50 µm.

Figure 2 Quantification of fluorescence signals, after incubation of oocytes and eggs with MTG and MTO. In the abscissa (a−h): 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm oocytes, 90 µm mature and fertilized eggs respectively. Ordinate: intensity values, referred to as arbitrary units. Data were reported as a mean of triplicate experiments.

Quantification of MTG and MTO signals

In order to calculate the total mitochondrial mass and activity we integrated the values of the fluorescent signals. Results suggested that green and red signals comparably increased during oogenesis, with a little decrease in red fluorescence in the mature egg. After fertilization the mitochondrial mass did not change, while OXHPHOS activity had the similar levels compared with larger oocytes (Fig. 2).

In the larger oocytes (60/90 µm) OXPHOS activity was more pronounced in close proximity to GV region, as shown in Fig. 1. Interestingly this result suggests that at the end of oogenesis, next to meiotic completion, red fluorescence appears to be concentrated more in a specific area near the germinal vesicle, where it reached values almost two times higher than in the other regions (Fig. 3).

Figure 3 Quantification of fluorescent signals after incubation with MTG and MTO: equatorial optical sections of a representative oocyte captured by CLSM. (A, B) Green and red signals in grey scale. (C) Merge of green and red fluorescence in RGB colours; in the bottom correspondent plot profiles. Abscissa: distance, measured in inches, along the diameter of oocyte; ordinate: intensity values of incorporated fluorescent probes in different areas of an equatorial optical section of the 90 µm oocyte, measured as arbitrary units. Bar represents 50 µm.

Detection and quantification of mtDNA and Hsp56

In order to study the mtDNA in vivo, we incubated oocytes and eggs with PicoGreen dsDNA, an ultra-sensitive fluorescent probe which allowed us to detect and quantify even small amounts of DNA, avoiding damage to cellular morphology and/or viability. Results achieved after subtracting the fluorescence values due to nuclear DNA, showed that mtDNA, actively increased in the oocytes from 20 to 80 µm, while in that of 90 µm, as in mature and fertilized eggs, it did not augment, probably because final copy number had been achieved (Fig. 4). As a control, DNase treatments were performed (Fig. 4 i).

Figure 4 In situ detection of fluorescent signals after PicoGreen dsDNA incubation: equatorial optical sections of representative oocytes and eggs, captured by CLSM. (a−h): 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm oocytes, 90 µm mature and fertilized eggs, respectively; i: control after incubation with DNase. Bar represents 50 µm. Graph: quantification of intensity values for mtDNA fluorescence, results obtained by subtracting, through Image J software, the nuclear fluorescence. (a−h) In the abscissa: same samples showed in the images; ordinate: intensity values, referred to as arbitrary units. Data were reported as a mean of triplicate experiments.

In addition, we studied by immunofluorescence the localization of the Hsp56 chaperonin, a well known mitochondrial marker, reacting with an heterologous antibody against Hsp60 that specifically recognizes the corresponding sea urchin protein (Roccheri et al., Reference Roccheri, Patti, Agnello, Gianguzza, Carra and Rinaldi2001). The protein, quite uniformly distributed, accumulates over the entire oogenesis, reaching values that remain constant after fertilization, as demonstrated by densitometric analyses (Fig. 5). Negative controls have confirmed the specificity of fluorescent signals.

Figure 5 In situ detection of Hsp56 after immunofluorescence with the antibody anti-hsp60: equatorial optical sections of representative oocytes and eggs, captured by CLSM. (a−h): 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm oocytes, 90 µm mature and fertilized eggs, respectively. (i): Negative control in which the primary antibody was omitted. Bar represents 50 µm. Graph: quantification of intensity values for Hsp56. (a−h) In the abscissa: same samples showed in the images; ordinate: intensity values, referred to as arbitrary units. Data were reported as a mean of triplicate experiments.

Discussion

In the present paper we studied mitochondria during P. lividus oogenesis, by applying CLSM imaging technologies. For many years CLSM has had wide application in biological sciences, medical fields (Pawley, Reference Pawley1995; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Zhu, Lu, Huang and Zhao2000) and marine biological studies, specifically concerning the reproduction and development of marine organisms (Hertzler & Clark, Reference Hertzler and Clark1992; Summers et al., Reference Summers, Stricker, Cameron and Matsumoto1993; Holy, Reference Holy and Paddock1999; Buttino et al., Reference Buttino, Ianora, Carotenuto, Zupo and Miralto2003; Morici et al., Reference Morici, Agnello, Spagnolo, Roccheri, Di Liegro and Rinaldi2007; Agnello et al., Reference Agnello, Morici and Rinaldi2008). Recently, using this useful tool, the occurrence of autophagic processes during sea urchin oogenesis and early development has been demonstrated (Agnello et al., Reference Agnello, Chiarelli, Martino, Bosco and Roccheri2016).

Gametogenesis represents a key step responsible for the success of embryogenesis. Mitochondria play an essential role throughout oogenesis and embryogenesis, emerging from basic research in model species and clinical studies in human infertility (Van Blerkom, Reference Van Blerkom2011).

During development mitochondria are maternally transmitted with little, if any, paternal contribution, and they originate from a restricted founder population, which is amplified during oogenesis and no further increases in early development (Dumollard et al., Reference Dumollard, Duchen and Duchen2007). Mitochondrial number of mammalian primordial germ cells is amplified during oogenesis (Poulton & Marchington, Reference Poulton and Marchington2002) and the organelles translocate from a cortical to a perinuclear area just before germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD). A cloud of mitochondria and ER elements surrounds the spindle during its migration to the cortex, providing energy and spatial information for the spindle displacement (Dalton & Carroll, Reference Dalton and Carroll2013; Yi et al., Reference Yi, Rubinstein, Unruh, Guo, Slaughter and Li2013; Coticchio et al., Reference Coticchio, Dal Canto, Mignini Renzini, Guglielmo, Brambillasca, Turchi, Novara and Fadini2015).

Mitochondrial dysfunctions cause a decrease in oocyte quality and interferes with fertility and embryonic development (Babayev and Seli, Reference Babayev and Seli2015). The mtDNA copy number of oocyte has been introduced as a useful parameter for prediction of oocyte competence (Pedersen et al., Reference Pedersen, Løvendahl, Larsen, Madsen and Callesen2016).

The localization of mitochondria in the egg during maturation and their segregation to blastomeres in the cleaving embryo are strictly regulated. Gradients of mitochondria distribution in the egg give rise to blastomeres receiving different numbers of organelles, contributing to the viability and definition of embryonic axes. Mitochondrial dysfunction may interfere with development and could cause apoptosis, thus having a dual role, in life and cell death (Dumollard et al. Reference Dumollard, Duchen and Duchen2007).

During frog and zebrafish oogenesis, germ plasm and mitochondria are closely related and mitochondria actively participate to germ plasm formation (Kloc & Etkin Reference Kloc and Etkin1998; Knaut et al. Reference Knaut, Pelegri, Bohmann and Nüsslein-Volhard2000; Kosaka et al. Reference Kosaka, Kawakami, Sakamoto and Inoue2007; Wilding et al. Reference Wilding, Dale, Marino, di Matteo, Alviggi, Pisaturo, Lombardi and De Placido2001b). In frog, fly, fish, mouse, and other mammals, including humans, the formation of the Balbiani body has been observed, a transient collection of organelles, inclusions, and molecules (endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, Golgi, and proteins), near the nucleus of primary oocytes. The Balbiani body, asymmetrically positioned, segregates germ plasm and vegetal patterning molecules in the oocyte, disappearing prior to stage II of oogenesis (Pepling et al., Reference Pepling, Wilhelm, O'Hara, Gephardt and Spradling2007; Billett & Adam, Reference Billett and Adam1976; Bukovsky et al., Reference Bukovsky, Caudle, Svetlikova and Upadhyaya2004; Kloc et al., Reference Kloc, Jaglarz, Dougherty, Stewart, Nel-Themaat and Bilinski2008; de Smedt et al., Reference de Smedt, Szollosi and Kloc2000; Kloc et al., Reference Kloc, Bilinski, Dougherty, Brey and Etkin2004). Recently it has been demonstrated that the oocytes of sea urchins S. intermedius have germ plasm-related organelles in the form of germ granules, resembling Balbiani bodies, and perinuclear cloud. Maternal germ plasm, accumulated in late oogenesis at the cell periphery and in the eggs, is associated with cortical cytoskeleton (Yakovlev, Reference Yakovlev2016).

Maternal mitochondria support P. lividus development until the larva stage, without new synthesis of mtDNA or production of new mitochondria (Matsumoto et al., Reference Matsumoto, Kasamatsu, Pikó and Vinograd1974; Bresch, Reference Bresch1978; Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi, De Leo, Arzone, Salcher, Storace and Mutolo1979a,Reference Rinaldi, Salcher-Cillari and Mutolob). Whereas mitochondrial mass does not change, mitochondrial respiration increases (Morici et al., Reference Morici, Agnello, Spagnolo, Roccheri, Di Liegro and Rinaldi2007). Mitochondria consume oxygen at low levels before fertilization, but soon after the oxidative activity increases probably because fertilization induces the activation of metabolism in order to guarantee cell duplications, requiring a high energetic support supplied by mitochondria (Agnello et al. Reference Agnello, Morici and Rinaldi2008). An understanding of organelle activity during development is almost completely clear, but mitochondrial behaviour during oogenesis remains poorly understood.

In the present paper we demonstrate a parallel rise of mitochondrial mass and OXPHOS activity during oogenesis, up to 90 µm oocytes, and a decrease in the activity in mature eggs. Interestingly, we detect evident anisotropies of mitochondrial activity: the oxygen consumption appears to be higher around the GV, especially in the larger oocytes, just before the GVBD, probably for energetic aims, and more active mitochondria appear to be concentrated in a specific portion of the cytoplasm.

Recent data have shown that the autophagic process is required for sea urchin oogenesis undoubtedly as a survival mechanism (Agnello et al., Reference Agnello, Chiarelli, Martino, Bosco and Roccheri2016). The major concentration of vesicular acidic organelles is near the GV, possibly for the energetic need of the following GVBD. Intriguingly, mitochondrial activity is also more pronounced around the GV. The occurrence at the same time in nearby areas of two catabolic mechanisms, OXPHOS activity and autophagy, is interesting because their coexistence could occur to ensure the final steps of meiotic process.

Our results suggest that there is a decrease in mitochondrial activity in the mature eggs; this is not surprising considering the basal metabolism of mature eggs that are characterized by a cell cycle arrested in G0 (Costache et al., Reference Costache, McDougall and Dumollard2014). After fertilization OXPHOS activity increases (Morici et al., Reference Morici, Agnello, Spagnolo, Roccheri, Di Liegro and Rinaldi2007; Agnello et al., Reference Agnello, Morici and Rinaldi2008).

Further and significant information was achieved by studying the mitochondrial chaperonin Hsp56 and mtDNA. Results showed a high increase in both Hsp56 and mtDNA, as well as in mitochondrial mass.

Taken together these results demonstrate that during oogenesis a parallel rise of different parameters, such as mass, activity, Hsp56 and mtDNA occurs, highlighting important tools in the establishment of developmental competence.

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Agnello, M., Chiarelli, R., Martino, C., Bosco, L. & Roccheri, A.M. (2016). Autophagy is required for sea urchin oogenesis and early development. Zygote 24, 918–26.Google Scholar
Agnello, M., Morici, G. & Rinaldi, A.M. (2008). A method for measuring mitochondrial mass and activity. Cytotechnology 56,145–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babayev, E. & Seli, E. (2015). Oocyte mitochondrial function and reproduction. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 27, 175–81.Google Scholar
Barritt, J., Brenner, C., Cohen, J. & Matt, D. (1999). Mitochondrial rearrangements in human oocytes and embryos. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 5, 927–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barritt, J.A., Kokot, M., Cohen, J., Steuerwald, N. & Brenner, C.A. (2002). Quantification of human ooplasmic mitochondria. Reprod. Biomed. 4, 243–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, L. & Wessel, G.M. (1997). Cortical granules of the sea urchin translocate early in oocyte maturation. Development 124, 1845–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billett, F.S. & Adam, E. (1976). The structure of the mitochondrial cloud of Xenopus laevis oocytes. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 36, 697710.Google Scholar
Bresch, H. (1978). Mitochondrial profile densities and areas in different developmental stages of the sea urchin Sphaerechinus granularis . Exp. Cell Res. 111, 205–9.Google Scholar
Bukovsky, A., Caudle, M.R., Svetlikova, M. & Upadhyaya, N.B. (2004). Origin of germ cells and formation of new primary follicles in adult human ovaries. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2, 20.Google Scholar
Buttino, I., Ianora, A., Carotenuto, Y., Zupo, V. & Miralto, A. (2003). Use of the confocal laser scanning microscope in studies on the developmental biology of marine crustaceans. Micros. Res. Tech. 60, 458–64.Google Scholar
Cao, L., Shitara, H., Horii, T. Nagao, Y., Imai, H., Abe, K., Hara, T., Hayashi, J. & Yonekawa, H. (2007). The mitochondrial bottleneck occurs without reduction of mtDNA content in female mouse germ cells. Nat. Genet. 39, 386–90.Google Scholar
Chang, P., Torres, J., Lewis, R. A. Mowry, K.L., Houliston, E. & King, M.L. (2004). Location of RNAs to the mitochondrial cloud in Xenopus oocytes through entrapment and association with endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15, 4669–81.Google Scholar
Costache, V., McDougall, A. & Dumollard, R. (2014). Cell cycle arrest and activation of development in marine invertebrate deuterostomes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 450, 1175–81.Google Scholar
Coticchio, G., Dal Canto, M., Mignini Renzini, M., Guglielmo, M.C., Brambillasca, F., Turchi, D., Novara, P.V. & Fadini, R. (2015) Oocyte maturation: gamete-somatic cells interactions, meiotic resumption, cytoskeletal dynamics and cytoplasmic reorganization. Hum. Reprod. Update 21, 427–54.Google Scholar
Cuezva, J.M., Ostronoff, L.K., Ricart, J., López de Heredia, M., Di Liegro, C.M. & Izquierdo, J.M. (1997). Mitochondrial biogenesis in the liver during development and oncogenesis. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 29, 365−77.Google Scholar
Dalton, C.M. & Carroll, J. (2013). Biased inheritance of mitochondria during asymmetric cell division in the mouse oocyte. J. Cell Sci. 126, 2955–64.Google Scholar
de Paula, W.B., Agip, A.N., Missirlis, F., Ashworth, R., Vizcay-Barrena, G., Lucas, C.H. & Allen, J.F. (2013). Female and male gamete mitochondria are distinct and complementary in transcription, structure, and genome function. Genome Biol. Evol. 5, 1969–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Smedt, V., Szollosi, D. & Kloc, M. (2000). The balbiani body: asymmetry in the mammalian oocyte. Genesis 26, 208–12.Google Scholar
Di Liegro, C.M. & Rinaldi, A.M. (2007). Hsp56 mRNA in Paracentrotus lividus embryos binds to a mitochondrial protein. Cell Biol. Int. 31, 1331–5.Google Scholar
Di Liegro, C.M., Agnello, M., Casano, C., Roccheri, M.C., Gianguzza, F. & Rinaldi, A.M. (2008). Hsp56 protein and mRNA distribution in normal and stressed P. lividus embryos. Caryologia 61, 82–7.Google Scholar
Dumollard, R., Duchen, M. & Duchen, J. (2007). The role of mitochondrial function in the oocyte and embryo. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 77, 2149.Google Scholar
Enríquez, J.A., Fernández-Silva, P., Garrido-Pérez, N., López-Pérez, M.J., Pérez-Martos, A. & Montoya, J. (1999). Direct regulation of mitochondrial RNA synthesis by thyroid hormone. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 657–70.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, A. & Yasumasu, I. (1997). Does the respiratory rate in sea urchin embryos increase during early development without proliferation of mitochondria? Dev. Growth Differ. 39, 179–89.Google Scholar
Gianguzza, F., Ragusa, M.A., Roccheri, M.C., Di Liegro, I. & Rinaldi, A.M. (2000). Isolation and characterization of a Paracentrotus lividus cDNA encoding a stress-inducible chaperonin. Cell Stress Chaperones 5, 87–9.Google Scholar
Giudice, G. (1985). The Sea Urchin Embryo. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 73–4.Google Scholar
Giudice, G., Sconzo, G., Bono, A. & Albanese, I. (1972). Studies on sea urchin oocytes. I. Purification and cell fractionation. Exp. Cell Res. 72, 90–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffart, S. & Wiesner, R.J. (2003). Regulation and co-ordination of nuclear gene expression during mitochondrial biogenesis. Exp. Physiol. 88, 3340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertzler, P.L. & Clark, W.H. Jr (1992). Cleavage and gastrulation in the shrimp Sicyonia ingentis: invagination is accompanied by oriented cell division. Development 116, 127–40.Google Scholar
Holy, J.M. (1999). Imaging sea urchin fertilization. In Methods in Molecular Biology, Confocal Microscopy Methods and Protocols (ed. Paddock, S.W.). Humana Press, Totowa: New Jersey, pp. 153–66.Google Scholar
Hood, D.A. (2001). Invited Review: Contractile activity-induced mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 90, 1137–57.Google Scholar
Kiyomoto, M., Zito, F., Costa, C., Poma, V., Sciarrino, S. & Matranga, V. (2007). Skeletogenesis by transfected secondary mesenchyme cells is dependent on extracellular matrix-ectoderm interactions in Paracentrotus lividus sea urchin embryos. Dev. Growth Differ. 49, 731–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingenspor, M., Ivemeyer, M., Wiesinger, H., Haas, K., Heldmaier, G. & Wiesner, R.J. (1996). Biogenesis of thermogenic mitochondria in brown adipose tissue of Djungarian hamsters during cold adaptation. Biochem. J. 316, 607–13.Google Scholar
Kloc, M. & Etkin, L.D. (1998). Apparent continuity between the messenger transport organizer and late RNA localization pathways during oogenesis in Xenopus . Mech. Dev. 73, 95106.Google Scholar
Kloc, M., Bilinski, S., Dougherty, M.T., Brey, E.M. & Etkin, L.D. (2004). Formation, architecture and polarity of female germline cyst in Xenopus . Dev. Biol. 266, 4361.Google Scholar
Kloc, M., Jaglarz, M., Dougherty, M., Stewart, M.D., Nel-Themaat, L. & Bilinski, S. (2008). Mouse early oocytes are transiently polar: three-dimensional and ultrastructural analysis. Exp. Cell Res. 314, 3245–54.Google Scholar
Knaut, H., Pelegri, F., Bohmann, K. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (2000). Zebrafish vasa RNA but not its protein is a component of the germ plasm and segregates asymmetrically before germline specification. J. Cell Biol. 149, 875–88.Google Scholar
Kosaka, K., Kawakami, K., Sakamoto, H. & Inoue, K. (2007). Spatiotemporal localization of germ plasm RNAs during zebrafish oogenesis. Mech. Dev. 124, 279–89.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, L., Kasamatsu, H., Pikó, L. & Vinograd, J. (1974) Mitochondrial DNA replication in sea urchin oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 63, 146–59.Google Scholar
May-Panloup, P., Chretien, M.F., Malthiery, Y. & Reynier, P. (2007). Mitochondrial DNA in the oocyte and the developing embryo. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 77, 5183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morici, G., Agnello, M., Spagnolo, F., Roccheri, M.C., Di Liegro, C.M. & Rinaldi, A.M. (2007). Confocal microscopy study of the distribution, content and activity of mitochondria during Paracentrotus lividus development. J. Microsc. 228, 165–73.Google Scholar
Nagata, T. (2006). Electron microscopic radioautographic study on protein synthesis in hepatocyte mitochondria of aging mice. Sci. World J. 15, 1583–98.Google Scholar
Nishi, Y., Takeshita, T., Stato, K. & Araki, T. (2003). Change of the mitochondrial distribution in mouse ooplasm during in vitro maturation. J. Nippon Med. Sch. 70, 408–15.Google Scholar
Pawley, J.B. (ed.) (1995). Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd edn. Plenum Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, H.S., Løvendahl, P., Larsen, K., Madsen, L.B. & Callesen, H. (2016). Porcine oocyte mtDNA copy number is high or low depending on the donor. Zygote 24, 617–23.Google Scholar
Pepling, M.E., Wilhelm, J.E., O'Hara, A.L., Gephardt, G.W. & Spradling, A.C. (2007). Mouse oocytes within germ cell cysts and primordial follicles contain a Balbiani body. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 187–92.Google Scholar
Perez, G.I., Trbovich, A.M., Gosgen, R.G. & Tilly, J.L. (2000). Mitochondria and the death of oocytes. Nature 403, 500–1.Google Scholar
Pollak, J.K. & Sutton, R. (1980). The transport and accumulation of adenine nucleotides during mitochondrial biogenesis. Biochem. J. 192, 7583.Google Scholar
Poulton, J. & Marchington, D.R. (2002). Segregation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in human oocytes and in animal models of mtDNA disease: clinical implications. Reproduction 123, 751−5.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, A.M., De Leo, G., Arzone, A., Salcher, I., Storace, A. & Mutolo, V. (1979a). Biochemical and electron microscopic evidence that cell nucleus negatively controls mitochondrial genomic activity in early sea urchin development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 1916–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaldi, A.M., Salcher-Cillari, I. & Mutolo, V. (1979b). Mitochondrial division in not nucleated sea urchin eggs. Cell. Biol. Int. Rep. 3, 179–82.Google Scholar
Roccheri, M.C., Bosco, L., Ristuccia, M.E., Cascino, D., Giudice, G., Oliva, A.O. & Rinaldi, A.M. (1997). Sea urchin mitochondrial matrix contains a 56-kDa chaperonine-like protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 234, 646–50.Google Scholar
Roccheri, M.C., Patti, M., Agnello, M., Gianguzza, F., Carra, E. & Rinaldi, A.M. (2001). Localization of mitochondrial Hsp56 chaperonin during sea urchin development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 287, 1093–8.Google Scholar
Schnapp, B.J., Arn, E.A., Deshler, J.O. & Highet, M.I. (1997). RNA localization in Xenopus oocytes. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 8, 529–40.Google Scholar
Sieber, M.H., Thomsen, M.B. & Spradling, A.C. (2016). Electron transport chain remodeling by gsk3 during oogenesis connects nutrient state to reproduction. Cell 164, 420–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summers, R.G., Stricker, S.A. & Cameron, R.A. (1993). Applications of confocal microscopy to studies of sea urchin embryogenesis. In Methods in Cell Biology: Cell Biological Applications of Confocal Microscopy (ed. Matsumoto, B.). Academic Press, San Diego: California, USA pp. 266–86.Google Scholar
Sun, Q.Y., Wu, G. M., Lai, L. X. Park, K.W., Cabot, R., Cheong, H.T., Day, B.N., Prather, R.S. & Schatten, H. (2001). Translocation of active mitochondria during pig oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development in vitro . Reproduction 122, 155–63.Google Scholar
Torner, H., Brüssow, K.P., Alm, H., Ratky, J., Pöhland, R., Tuchscherer, A. & Kanitz, W. (2004). Mitochondrial aggregation patterns and activity in porcine oocytes and apoptosis in surrounding cumulus cells depends on the stage of pre-ovulatory maturation. Theriogenology 61, 1675–89.Google Scholar
Van Blerkom, J. (2011). Mitochondrial function in the human oocyte and embryo and their role in developmental competence. Mitochondrion 11, 797813.Google Scholar
Van Blerkom, J., Davis, P., Mathwig, V. & Alexander, S. (2002). Domains of high-polarized mitochondria may occur in mouse and human oocytes and early embryos. Hum. Reprod. 17, 393406.Google Scholar
Wessel, G.M., Berg, L. & Conner, S.D. (2004a). Cortical granule translocation is linked to meiotic maturation in the sea urchin oocyte. Development 129, 4315–25.Google Scholar
Wessel, G.M., Voronina, E. & Brooks, J.M. (2004b). Obtaining and handling echinoderm oocytes. Methods Cell Biol. 74, 87114.Google Scholar
Wilding, M., Carotenuto, R., Infante, V. Dale, B., Marino, M., Di Matteo, L. & Campanella, C. (2001a). Confocal microscopy analysis of the activity of mitochondria contained within the ‘mitochondrial cloud’ during oogenesis in Xenopus laevis . Zygote 9, 347–52.Google Scholar
Wilding, M., Dale, B., Marino, M., di Matteo, L., Alviggi, C., Pisaturo, M.L., Lombardi, L. & De Placido, G. (2001b). Mitochondrial aggregation patterns and activity in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Hum. Reprod. 16, 909–17.Google Scholar
Yaffe, M.P. (1999). Dynamic mitochondria. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, E149–50.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, K.V. (2016). Localization of germ plasm-related structures during sea urchin oogenesis. Dev. Dynam. 245, 5666.Google Scholar
Yi, K., Rubinstein, B., Unruh, J.R., Guo, F., Slaughter, B.D. & Li, R. (2013). Sequential actin-based pushing forces drive meiosis I chromosome migration and symmetry breaking in oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 200, 567–76.Google Scholar
Zhang, W.H., Zhu, S.N., Lu, S.L., Huang, Y.L. & Zhao, P. (2000). Three-dimensional image of hepatocellular carcinoma under confocal laser scanning microscope. World J. Gastroenterol. 6, 344–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y.Z., Ouyang, Y.C., Hou, Y., Schatten, H., Chen, D.Y. & Sun, Q.Y. (2008). Mitochondrial behavior during oogenesis in zebrafish: a confocal microscopy analysis. Dev. Growth Differ. 50, 189201.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 In vivo incubation with MTG and MTO: equatorial optical sections of representative oocytes, at different sizes, and mature eggs, captured by CLSM. In green: the mitochondria population stained with MTG. In red: active mitochondria stained with MTO. Bottom: merge of green and red fluorescence. (a1–a3): 20 µm oocytes; (b1–b3): 30 µm oocytes; (c1–c3): 40 µm oocytes; (d1–d3): 60 µm oocytes; (e1–e3): 80 µm oocytes; (f1–f3): 90 µm oocytes; (g1–g3): 90 µm mature egg; (h1, h2): negative controls after oligomycin incubation; (h3): merge of MTG and MTO signals in the zygote, 20 min after fertilization. Bar represents 50 µm.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Quantification of fluorescence signals, after incubation of oocytes and eggs with MTG and MTO. In the abscissa (a−h): 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm oocytes, 90 µm mature and fertilized eggs respectively. Ordinate: intensity values, referred to as arbitrary units. Data were reported as a mean of triplicate experiments.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Quantification of fluorescent signals after incubation with MTG and MTO: equatorial optical sections of a representative oocyte captured by CLSM. (A, B) Green and red signals in grey scale. (C) Merge of green and red fluorescence in RGB colours; in the bottom correspondent plot profiles. Abscissa: distance, measured in inches, along the diameter of oocyte; ordinate: intensity values of incorporated fluorescent probes in different areas of an equatorial optical section of the 90 µm oocyte, measured as arbitrary units. Bar represents 50 µm.

Figure 3

Figure 4 In situ detection of fluorescent signals after PicoGreen dsDNA incubation: equatorial optical sections of representative oocytes and eggs, captured by CLSM. (a−h): 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm oocytes, 90 µm mature and fertilized eggs, respectively; i: control after incubation with DNase. Bar represents 50 µm. Graph: quantification of intensity values for mtDNA fluorescence, results obtained by subtracting, through Image J software, the nuclear fluorescence. (a−h) In the abscissa: same samples showed in the images; ordinate: intensity values, referred to as arbitrary units. Data were reported as a mean of triplicate experiments.

Figure 4

Figure 5 In situ detection of Hsp56 after immunofluorescence with the antibody anti-hsp60: equatorial optical sections of representative oocytes and eggs, captured by CLSM. (a−h): 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm oocytes, 90 µm mature and fertilized eggs, respectively. (i): Negative control in which the primary antibody was omitted. Bar represents 50 µm. Graph: quantification of intensity values for Hsp56. (a−h) In the abscissa: same samples showed in the images; ordinate: intensity values, referred to as arbitrary units. Data were reported as a mean of triplicate experiments.