Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T08:19:35.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of genetic variability amongst cultivated populations of Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) detected by ISSR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2021

Karishma Kashyap
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering and Technology, GUIST, Gauhati University, Guwahati781014, India
Rasika M. Bhagwat
Affiliation:
Teri, Western Regional Centre, Mumbai400614, India
Sofia Banu*
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering and Technology, GUIST, Gauhati University, Guwahati781014, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: sofiabanu2@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) is a commercial mandarin variety grown in northeast India and one of the 175 Indian food items included in the global first food atlas. The cultivated plantations of Khasi mandarin grown prominently in the lower Brahmaputra valley of Assam, northeast India, have been genetically eroded. The lack in the efforts for conservation of genetic variability in this mandarin variety prompted diversity analysis of Khasi mandarin germplasm across the region. Thus, the study aimed to investigate genetic diversity and partitioning of the genetic variations within and among 92 populations of Khasi mandarin collected from 10 cultivated sites in Kamrup and Kamrup (M) districts of Assam, India, using Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers. The amplification of genomic DNA with 17 ISSR primers yielded 216 scorable DNA amplicons of which 177 (81.94%) were polymorphic. The average polymorphism information content was 0.39 per primer. The total genetic diversity (HT = 0.28 ± 0.03) was close to the diversity within the population (HS = 0.20 ± 0.01). A high mean coefficient of gene differentiation (GST = 0.29) reflected a high level of gene flow (Nm = 1.22), indicating high genetic differentiation among the populations. Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) showed 78% of intra-population differentiation, 21% among the population and 1% among the districts. The obtained results indicate the existence of a high level of genetic diversity in the cultivated Khasi mandarin populations, indicating the need for preservation of each existing population to revive the dying out orchards in northeast India.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Introduction

The citrus genetic resources hold great economic importance for the Indian fruit industry (Hazarika, Reference Hazarika2012). Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) is a commercially grown mandarin variety in northeast India and plays a vital role in the management of Citrus germplasm in India (Hazarika, Reference Hazarika2012; Singh et al., Reference Singh, MeeteiNg, Singh and Mandal2016). It is suitable for the local conditions and has been growing over a long period (Ghosh, Reference Ghosh1977). It is grown prominently in the lower Brahmaputra valley of Assam, which is one of the leading states of mandarin cultivation in northeast India (Singh et al., Reference Singh, MeeteiNg, Singh and Mandal2016).

Most of the valuable germplasm of Khasi mandarin in this region is usually maintained in home gardens, backyard gardens and a handful of commercially established orchards by the farmers since very old times (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Kumar, Singh, Dhariwal and Chaudhury2013). But in the present scenario, these non-commercial home gardens as well as the commercial cultivations of Khasi mandarin have been dying out (Deshmukh et al., Reference Deshmukh, Patel, Krishnappa, Verma, Rymbai, Assumi, Lyngdoh, Jha and Malhotra2017). This is due to genetic erosion, cultivation of commercial cash crops, extensive shifting cultivation, changing climatic conditions and nutrient imbalance (Hazarika, Reference Hazarika2012). Most of the orange orchards in the regions are propagated through seeds without incorporating any improved techniques like budded/grafted material (Patel et al., Reference Patel, Babu, Singh, Yadav and De2010). Besides, the plant material of seedling origin is susceptible to various soil-borne diseases and insect pests which lead to a decline of the orchards in the region (Deshmukh et al., Reference Deshmukh, Patel, Krishnappa, Verma, Rymbai, Assumi, Lyngdoh, Jha and Malhotra2017). On the other hand, rootstocks are known to increase the vigour, tree size, improve pest resistance and adapt to climatic and soil conditions (Hussain et al., Reference Hussain, Khadija, Aziz, Khan, Salik and Anwar2017). Moreover, most of the orange orchards are located on the uncovered steep areas with no proper soil conservation measures, and as a result, heavy rains wash away the nutrient-rich soil leading to relatively less fertile surface soil. This leads to an inappropriate drop in productivity of the orchards (Singh et al., Reference Singh, MeeteiNg, Singh and Mandal2016; Bhandari et al., Reference Bhandari, Bhanu, Srivastava, Singh and Shreya2017). Thus, the decline of the orchards warrants special attention to conserve the genetic variability in Khasi mandarin, which is still lacking and has not been given much attention (Singh et al., Reference Singh, MeeteiNg, Singh and Mandal2016). Therefore, assessment of the genetic diversity within and among the cultivated populations of Khasi mandarin is essential to design a suitable genetic resource management programme as well as to support the farmers to continue cultivating them (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Chaudhury, Kumar, Dhariwal, Bhandari, Malik, Chaudhury, Kumar, Dhariwal and Bhandari2012). In view of this, neutral molecular markers such as Inter-Simple Sequence repeat (ISSR) are highly reproducible and cost-effective which have been used in a wide range of applications in Citrus (Uzun et al., Reference Uzun, Gulsen, Yesiloglu, Akakacar and Tuzcu2010; Sharafi et al., Reference Sharafi, Abkenar and Sharafi2017).

Thus, the present study was designed to address the following objectives (i): to assess genetic diversity within and among the cultivated populations of Khasi mandarin collected from 10 sites covering Kamrup and Kamrup (M) districts, Assam, India using ISSR markers, (ii) to reveal the partitioning of the genetic variations among the districts, within, and among the cultivated populations of Khasi mandarin and (iii) to assess the efficiency of ISSR markers in evaluating genetic diversity in the cultivated populations of Khasi mandarin.

Materials and methods

Plant material and DNA extraction

Fresh leaf tissue of 92 individuals of Khasi mandarin was collected from plants that were 5–7 years old and stored at −80°C until DNA extraction. The samples were obtained from privately owned orange orchards and commercial citrus farms, with the permission of the owners, located in 10 sites (hereafter addressed as populations) in Kamrup and Kamrup (M) districts, Assam, India (Fig. 1). The collection sites were Boko (BO, 12 samples), Bamunigaon (BA, nine samples), Kahebama (K, 10 samples), Chayygaon (CH, 10 samples), Santipur (S, 10 samples), Dhupdhara (DH, five samples) covering Kamrup district and Panbari (P, 10 samples), Khetri (KH, 10 samples), Sonapur (SO, six samples) and Nortap (N, 10 samples) covering Kamrup (M) districts of Assam, India. The samples were collected from each site with due permission from the holders of each private orchard and the supervisor of each commercial citrus farms. The samples were taken for herbarium and authenticated at the Department of Botany, Gauhati University (accession no. 18168). Total genomic DNA was isolated from leaf tissue (2 g) using the cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide method as described by Doyle and Doyle (Reference Doyle and Doyle1990). The DNA pellet was dissolved in 100 μl of Tris-EDTA buffer and stored at 4°C. DNA was determined qualitatively by running in 0.8% agarose gel buffered with 1X TAE and then quantified on NanoDrop1000 UV-spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Pvt. Ltd, USA).

Fig. 1. Map of Kamrup, Assam, India, showing geographic locations of the sampled populations.

PCR amplification

A total of 100 ISSR primers initially identified by the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, were manufactured from Eurofins Genomics, Bangalore, India. An initial set of 50 primers was screened for PCR amplification and 17 primers that produced clear and reproducible banding patterns with the sample DNA were chosen for final analysis. The PCR amplification protocol was optimized and was performed in a final volume of 25 μl containing 25 ng template DNA, 1X Taq buffer with 15 mM of magnesium chloride, 0.1 mM dNTPs, 0.3 μM primer and 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase. The PCRs were carried out in a Veriti thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, USA) under the profile: 94°C for 4 min followed by 36 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50–56°C for 45 s, 72°C for 2 min and with a final extension of 72°C for 7 min. The amplified products were resolved in 2% agarose gel in 1X TAE buffer for 3 h at 90 V and the amplicons were detected by staining with ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, Mumbai, India) and photographed using the UVitech gel documentation system (Bangalore Genei, Bangalore, India). Molecular weights of the PCR products were estimated by comparing them with 1 Kb and ØX/HaeIII digest DNA ladders.

Data analysis

Since ISSR markers show dominant inheritance, the loci are therefore considered to produce one amplifiable allele and the other null allele. Our study adopted a band-based approach; unambiguously scored as 1 and 0 for present and absent alleles, respectively (Bonin et al., Reference Bonin, Ehrich and Manel2007). Bands that resolved poorly on the gel were treated as missing ones. The efficiency of ISSR markers was evaluated by calculating the rare, shared and similar bands. Bands that amplified in more than 70% of the populations were treated as similar bands, those that amplified in 15–70% of the populations were treated as shared bands, while those that amplified in less than 15% of the population were treated as rare bands (Grativol et al., Reference Grativol, Lira-Medeiros, Hemerly and Ferreira2011). Loci producing both monomorphic and polymorphic amplicons were analysed. Genetic variability was interpreted as the rate of polymorphism (%) and Polymorphism Information Content (PIC), a valuable marker that detects polymorphism within a population by considering both the number of alleles that are expressed and also the relative frequencies of those alleles (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Chin, Shu, Smith, Wall, Senior, Mitchell, Kresovich and Ziegle1997). The PIC was calculated from: 1−p 2q 2 (p = amplified band present; q = no band present). The ISSR Primer Index (SPI), which is indicative of the efficiency of the marker system, was then calculated from the PIC values by summing up the values of all the loci amplified by the given primer. The Probability Index (PI) that the two arbitrarily selected genotypes would show identical DNA amplification profiles using the same set of ISSR primer was calculated as PI = (XD)n, where XD is the average genetic similarity index for all the pairwise comparisons and n represents the mean number of fragments obtained per genotype (Rajwade et al., Reference Rajwade, Arora, Kadoo, Harsulkar, Ghorpade and Gupta2010).

Various genetic diversity parameters such as h (Nei's genetic diversity; Nei, Reference Nei1973), I (Shannon's indices; Nei, Reference Nei, Ryman and Utter1987), H S (average genetic diversity within the population), H T (total genetic diversity among the population), G ST (coefficient of genetic differentiation) and N m (gene flow) was computed for each marker by a binary data matrix into POPGENE ver.1.31 (Yeh et al., Reference Yeh, Yang and Boyle2000). Other parameters calculated include N a (observed number of alleles per locus), N e (effective number of alleles per locus), H e (Nei's genetic diversity, assuming Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium) and % P (percent polymorphism). To examine the geographic structure of genetic variation among the Khasi mandarin populations, correlations between genetic distance and geographic distance was performed using a Mantel test based on a pairwise matrix of Nei's (Reference Nei1978) unbiased genetic distances (computing 10,000 permutations; using XLSTAT 2017.2). The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated at a 5% level of significance. Parameters such as Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) and Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) were employed to determine the overall distribution of diversity within and among populations using GenALEx ver.6.4 (Peakall and Smouse, Reference Peakall and Smouse2006). A comparison of genetic distance between the populations was implemented using the distance matrix based on Nei's genetic distance (Nei, Reference Nei1972). UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) denoted as a dendrogram was built using the TFPGA (Tools for Population Genetic Analyses) software based on Nei's genetic distances after bootstrapping the data 1000 times (Miller, Reference Miller1997). A similarity matrix within the population was constructed with Jaccard's coefficients using the WINDIST package of WINBOOT (Yap and Nelson, Reference Yap and Nelson1996).

Results

Polymorphism and genetic diversity

The genomic DNA amplification with 17 selected ISSR primers used in the analysis of 92 individuals from 10 populations of Khasi mandarin and one out-group of Rough lemon yielded 216 clear and reproducible bands with a size range of 90–1600 bp of which 81.94% (177) were polymorphic and the remaining 18.05% (39) were monomorphic. The total number of bands per primer ranged from nine ((AG)9C and (AC)8T) to 22 ((AG)8Y) and the percentage of polymorphic bands per primer ranged from 100 to 40%. The PIC value for ISSR markers for Khasi mandarin was 0.49 with an average of 0.4 per primer (Table 1). The SPI ranged from a low value of 0.78 ((CT)8A) to a high value of 8.15 ((AG)8Y). The PI values ranged from 0.06 ((GA)9T) to 0.27 ((AG)9C) when calculated for individual primer (Table 2). The number of rare bands (NRB) ranged from 0 ((CT)8A) to 47.61% ((AG)8Y), while the number of shared bands (NSB) ranged from 14.60% ((AC)8T) to 69.62% ((CA)8RC). The percentage of polymorphic ISSR bands per population ranged from 51.3 to 65.7%, and the genetic diversity values ranged between 0.06 and 0.19 (Table 3). Of the 10 populations of Khasi mandarin, the highest level of polymorphism (65.7%) was observed for the Bamunigaon population; while Dhupdhara showed the lowest levels (51.3%). A significant but negative correlation was found between genetic distance and geographic distance (rAB = −0.94, P = 0.001, online Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2), at a 5% level of significance. The h and I among all the populations were 0.28 (±0.18) and 0.43 (±0.25), respectively. The H T was 0.28, while H S was 0.20. The study detected a G ST value of 0.29 and N m value of 1.22 (online Supplementary Table S1).

Table 1. Details of polymorphic ISSR markers used in the study

a Total bands = 216.

b Total polymorphic bands = 177.

c Average % polymorphism = 81.94%.

d Polymorphism information content.

Table 2. Characteristics of polymorphic ISSR markers used in the study

a Total no. of bands.

b No. of polymorphic bands.

c No. of rare bands.

d No. of shared bands.

e No. of similar bands.

Table 3. Polymorphism parameters estimated using ISSR marker data

a Nei's genetic diversity (assuming Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium).

b Standard deviation.

c Percent polymorphism.

Partitioning of genetic diversity

The total genetic variation was partitioned into variation among districts (regions), among populations and within populations (P = 0.001). The AMOVA analysis revealed that of the total genetic diversity, 1% was attributable among the regions (Kamrup and Kamrup (M)), 21% was attributable to the among-population differentiation and the rest 78% to the intra-population diversity. The analysis showed that more genetic variation within the populations exists in the Kamrup region in comparison to the Kamrup (M) region (online Supplementary Table S2). The PCoA analysis indicated that first and second PCs accounted for 15.70 and 6.26%, of the total variation (Fig. 2). Quadrant (Q) I and QIV grouped samples from Chayygaon and Nortap and samples from Boko, Panbari, and a single sample from Kahebama, while QII grouped samples from Santipur, Bamunigaon and Dhupdhara. Similarly, QIII grouped Khetri and Sonapur samples into a moderately distinct cluster. The PCoA pattern was also confirmed by the UPGMA dendrogram except for Dhupdhara, which was grouped with Santipur and Bamunigaonin in QII in the 2D plot, which was distinctly separated in the dendrogram. The dendrogram grouped Khetri and Sonapur populations in one cluster (I), Dhupdhara formed the root, while the rest of the seven populations were grouped in a major cluster (II), which was split into two sub-clusters (IIa and IIb); Chayygaon and Nortap; Boko and Panbari populations formed cluster IIa, while Kahebama, Santipur and Bamunigaon populations were grouped into cluster IIb (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2. Principal Coordinate Analysis of Khasi mandarin populations.

Fig. 3. UPGMA cluster analysis of Khasi mandarin populations collected from 10 locations in Kamrup and Kamrup (M), Assam using the distance matrix generated using Nei's (Reference Nei1972) algorithm. The percent values refer to bootstrap values.

Discussion

The ISSR markers are efficient in estimating genetic variability at the species level in a wide range of plant species (Govindaraj et al., Reference Govindaraj, Vetriventhan and Srinivasan2015; Nilkanta et al., Reference Nilkanta, Amom, Tikendra, Rahaman and Nongdam2017; Singh et al., Reference Singh, Chhajer, Pathak, Bhatt and Kalia2017; Yan et al., Reference Yan, Li, Zheng, Friedman and Wang2019). The maximum NRB produced by (AG)8Y (489 across 92 accessions) indicates the effectiveness of the prevalence of AG repeats in the recognition of a particular accession, especially in the studied populations of Khasi mandarin from Kamrup and Kamrup (M) districts, India. While the shared and similar bands detected resemblance among the populations from different geographic locations (Tatikonda et al., Reference Tatikonda, Wani, Kannan, Beerelli, Sreedevi, Hoisington, Devi and Varshney2009). A similar study was reported by Bhagwat et al. (Reference Bhagwat, Banu, Dholakia, Kadoo, Lagu and Gupta2014) using ISSR markers in Symplocos laurina Wall., where the NRB ranged from 30 ((CT)8RG) to 135 ((GGAT)4), the number of similar bands ranged from 0 ((TC)8G) to 857 ((TG)8RC) and NSB ranged from 343 ((CA)8T) to 726 ((CT)8RG). Since ISSRs are usually dominant markers, the PIC score for any locus can range from 0 to 0.5 (Singh et al., Reference Singh, Choudhury, Singh, Kumar, Srinivasan, Tyagi, Singh and Singh2013). The high average PIC value observed with ISSR markers in the present study indicates a significant level of genetic diversity among the mandarin populations considered in the study. The PIC score is a measure of variability at a particular locus. The more the PIC value for a locus, the higher is the chance that polymorphism will exist between two randomly selected genotypes at that locus. A similar average PIC value (0.47) was identified in Trichosanthes dioica using ISSR markers (Kumar and Agarwal, Reference Kumar and Agarwal2019). A moderate average PIC value for ISSRs was found in other Citrus species (Sharafi et al., Reference Sharafi, Abkenar and Sharafi2017; Uchoi et al., Reference Uchoi, Malik, Choudhary, Kumar, Pal, Rohini and Chaudhury2017). While Meena et al. (Reference Meena, Singh, Mahar, Sharma and Rana2019) identified a low average PIC value of 0.23 in Ephedra foliata using ISSR markers. Moreover, the highest SPI value obtained in the present study using (AG)8Y primer indicates the importance of AG repeats for detecting polymorphism in Khasi mandarin populations. The SPI indicates the information content of the ISSR markers that can be obtained per analysis. The higher the SPI value, the more is the usefulness of the marker (Lamare and Rao, Reference Lamare and Rao2015). A high SPI value of 5.68 ((CT)8RA) was observed in Musa acuminate Colla using ISSR markers (Lamare and Rao, Reference Lamare and Rao2015). Besides, a high SPI value of 8.91 (CACCACCACGC) was identified in T. dioica using ISSR markers (Kumar and Agarwal, Reference Kumar and Agarwal2019). Further, the low PI value observed in the present study indicates that the ISSR primers are efficient in distinguishing different accessions. The PI value indicates the ability of a set of primers to uniquely distinguish two genotypes (Rajwade et al., Reference Rajwade, Arora, Kadoo, Harsulkar, Ghorpade and Gupta2010). Thus, the high level of overall polymorphism, PIC and SPI identified in the present study using ISSR markers proved informative for analysing diversity in the Khasi mandarin populations and this finding is in line with the studies by Sharafi et al. (Reference Sharafi, Abkenar, Sharafi and Masaeli2016) and Singh et al. (Reference Singh, MeeteiNg, Singh and Mandal2016). The level of polymorphism percentage found in the present study is comparable with the previous findings carried out in C. reticulata Blanco (P = 95.62%, Pal et al., Reference Pal, Malik, Kumar, Choudhary, Sharma and Chaudhury2013), wild Citrus spp. (P = 89.4%, Shahsavar et al., Reference Shahsavar, Izadpanah, Tafazoli and Tabatabaei2007), Citrus indica (P = 87%, Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Jena and Nair2010), a few commercially popular citrus species (P = 100%, Marak and Laskar, Reference Marak and Laskar2010) and other citrus cultivars using ISSR (P = 88.2%, Sharafi et al., Reference Sharafi, Abkenar, Sharafi and Masaeli2016). The level of polymorphism in the present study is also comparable with an important tree species, that is, T. dioica Roxb. (P = 95.96%, Kumar and Agarwal, Reference Kumar and Agarwal2019) cultivated in Assam–Bengal regions of India and a commercial fruit crop species, that is, Prunus armeniaca L. (P = 94.84%, Li et al., Reference Li, Zhao and Miao2013) cultivated in central Asia. The high level of genetic polymorphism in the present study might be due to genetic factors because the orchards bearing the Khasi mandarin trees planted by farmers across the region consist of citrus clones that are grown from seeds of diverse sources. Most of the existing ones may contain trees that are either of zygotic or nucellar origin besides being zygotic twins (Mondal and Saha, Reference Mondal and Saha2014).

The AMOVA analysis indicates that a greater part of the variation resides within populations in both Kamrup and Kamrup (M) regions. The high intra-population differentiation indicates that the basis of the population from which the existing populations originated might have been genetically diverse. Genetic drift, population isolation and breeding methods have been cited to explain a high level of intra-population variation (Hogbin and Peakall, Reference Hogbin and Peakall1999). Besides, traits such as longevity, pollination, high fertilization and out-crossing rates along with the life history of citrus species may have promoted the maintenance of high intra-population genetic variation (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Chen, Huang, Yu, Du, Mattia and Gmitter2018; Meena et al., Reference Meena, Singh, Mahar, Sharma and Rana2019). A similar pattern of high intra-population genetic variation has been established in woody species belonging to families such as Pinaceae, Fagaceae and Myrtaceae (Hamrick and Godt, Reference Hamrick and Godt1996), as well as in other perennial woody species such as S. laurina Wall., Melocanna baccifera (Roxb.), Ziziphus mauritiana (Lamk.) and E. foliata (Deshpande et al., Reference Deshpande, Apte, Bahulikar, Lagu, Kulkarni, Suresh, Singh, Rao, Gupta, Pant and Ranjekar2001; Nilkanta et al., Reference Nilkanta, Amom, Tikendra, Rahaman and Nongdam2017; Singh et al., Reference Singh, Chhajer, Pathak, Bhatt and Kalia2017; Meena et al., Reference Meena, Singh, Mahar, Sharma and Rana2019). These inferences were also supported by the PCoA ordination, where the populations illustrated distinct clustering and few were exclusively grouped in the ordination space and were overlapping to some extent. The PCoA revealed that mandarin accessions were scattered, indicating their possibility of being more divergent at the molecular level. Moreover, previous studies also reported molecular divergence in the mandarin group (Campos et al., Reference Campos, Espinosa, Warburton, Varela and Monter2005). Genetic differentiation among the populations and high intra-population diversity indicates that the management programme for the conservation of genetic variability in Khasi mandarin should aim to preserve every present population.

According to the results of cluster analysis based on genetic similarity, geographical affinity was shown between the populations. The result showed a good correspondence among the PCoA, UPGMA clustering and that clusters were related to the geographic distance between populations except for populations from Nortap and Boko, which were genetically similar to populations from Chayygaon and Panbari grouping together despite the distance separating the two districts, suggesting wider genetic variability of these two populations. For instance, Nortap and Chayygaon; Boko and Panbari populations clustering in the UPGMA tree as group II were located in the right-side (QI and QIV) of the PCoA diagram in two well-separated clusters. While the left quadrants (QII and QIII) in the PCoA diagram contained the remaining populations, which formed cluster II b and I in the UPGMA tree. This result, however, is not surprising considering that most mandarin trees are seedlings of either zygotic or nucellar origin. The ability of ISSR markers to separate closely related populations corroborates the findings by ColettaFilho et al. (Reference ColettaFilho, Machado, Targon and Pompeu2000) and Alansi et al. (Reference Alansi, Tarroum, Al-Qurainy, Khan and Nadeem2016). This similarity may be due to the reason that trees in each district might have been grown from seedlings originating from the same nursery or collection centre authorized to supply citrus seedlings, while some accessions might have been grown from unknown seedling sources. The difference in genetic makeup among populations from different locations could be attributed to evolutionary forces for favourably allowing seedling trees with genomes better suited to particular locations to develop through juvenility till reproductive maturity.

In the present study, the values of H T and H S suggest the existence of high genetic variation at the species level than at the population level, although they do not show any distinct morphological variation (data not shown). This is consistent with the findings of Meena et al. (Reference Meena, Singh, Mahar, Sharma and Rana2019) where similar estimates of high genetic diversity were obtained in E. foliata (H T = 0.23 and 0.25; H S = 0.16 and 0.23). In general, a backcross of the hybrids with the varieties of C. reticulata Blanco makes the mandarin group phenotypically and genotypically most diverse (Pal et al., Reference Pal, Malik, Kumar, Choudhary, Sharma and Chaudhury2013). Moreover, mandarins were found to be the most polymorphic among the ancestral species (Barkley et al., Reference Barkley, Roose, Krueger and Federici2006; Oueslati et al., Reference Oueslati, Salhi-Hannachi, Luro, Vignes, Mournet and Ollitrault2017). The genetic variation detected in Khasi mandarin using ISSR markers corroborates with the hypothesis that populations produced from out-crossing species can generate higher genetic diversity as compared to inbreeding ones (Verma and Rana, Reference Verma and Rana2011).

Further, the high level of total genetic diversity observed among the populations of Khasi mandarin in the study might be attributed to the effect of a broader gene pool and later, introduction to plantations from different gene pools might have established different alleles across the populations. Besides, this could be due to free genetic exchange within the mandarin group and closely related species such as Citrus sinensis Osbeck (sweet orange) and Citrus paradisi Macfad. to form cultivars of hybrid origin, respectively. Moreover, Khasi mandarin has a long cultivation period of over 20 years and produces a large number of seeds per year that grow rapidly following the same season after dehiscence, implying that the abundant seed set might contribute to accumulating mutations and harbour a high amount of diversity among the populations of Khasi mandarin (Bernet et al., Reference Bernet, Fernandez-Ribacoba, Carbonell and Asins2010). This inference is supported by the values of G ST observed in the study that indicates high genetic differentiation among the populations of Khasi mandarin. The G ST value larger than 0.25 is a threshold beyond which considerable population differentiation occurs (Han et al., Reference Han, Teng, Zhong, Zhou, Hu and Song2007). The G ST value in the present study is comparatively higher than the estimate found in Citrus aurantifolia cultivar (G ST = 0.13), an important commercial fruit crop (Munankarmi et al., Reference Munankarmi, Rana, Bhattarai, Shrestha, Joshi, Baral and Shrestha2018). Moreover, some other angiosperms such as Z. mauritiana (Lamk.) (Singh et al., Reference Singh, Chhajer, Pathak, Bhatt and Kalia2017) and Styrax obassia Sieb. Et Zucc. (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Xing, Xiao-jing Liu and Kong2015) also have revealed higher genetic differentiation. However, the value of genetic differentiation in the present study is higher than the average coefficients of long-lived perennial (G ST = 0.19) and out-crossing (G ST = 0.23) species (Nybom, Reference Nybom2004; Meena et al., Reference Meena, Singh, Mahar, Sharma and Rana2019). Mean G ST values of 0.59, 0.19 and 0.23 were assembled for selfing, mixed mating and out-crossing plants, respectively, based on the estimates of genetic diversity obtained with RAPD markers (Nybom and Bartish, Reference Nybom and Bartish2000). Based on these estimates, the amount and pattern of genetic variation in Khasi mandarin are more comparable to out-crossing species than to selfing. These inferences also reflect genetically distinct populations in the region differing concurrently in terms of allelic frequencies and sizes, implying that new mutations may be contributing to the high genetic diversity found in the cultivated Khasi mandarin populations. Based on differentiation among populations, the present study showed significantly high gene flow. Population differentiation and effective population size correspond to three different groups of N m values: high (≥1.000), moderate (0.25–0.99) and low (0.00–0.24) (Slatkin, Reference Slatkin1985). The N m value >1.0 indicates a significant movement of genetic material across populations through farmers in the region satisfying the lowest number of migrants per generation necessary to avoid genetic drift (Slatkin, Reference Slatkin1987). Thus, the value of gene flow that explains the inter-population genetic differentiation and the high intra-population differentiation indicates potentially superior fitness of the population (Hamrick and Godt, Reference Hamrick and Godt1996). Pollen dispersal, which is usually the primary means of gene flow, depends on the geographic distribution of the diverse compatible species available in a particular area (Pons et al., Reference Pons, Navarro, Ollitrault and Pena2011). The genetic diversity within the cultivated populations of Khasi mandarin suggests that since some of the cultivated populations are not distantly situated from wild habitats, thereby movement of pollens from wild to cultivated populations through an aerial distance of nearly 100–150 km might result in allele combinations which would not otherwise occur geographically (Miller and Gross, Reference Miller and Gross2011). This may have led to increased mixing and gene flow among geographically isolated populations. In the present study, the balance between genetics and environment in determining variation is interpreted in terms of populations that differed genetically, originating from the same district which can be exemplified further by floristic and pollen study.

Thus, there exists a high genetic diversity among the cultivated Khasi mandarin populations in the lower Brahmaputra valley of Assam, northeast India, suggesting that these orchards are effective reservoirs of plant genetic resources and can play a vital role in the conservation of mandarin orange germplasm. The present study highlights the utility of the ISSR marker system in the characterization of the Khasi mandarin populations based on polymorphism level. The present study may act as a baseline for sustainable utilization, breeding and conservation of this valuable germplasm. The information generated from this study will add to the existing knowledge on mandarin orange genetic resources and will be helpful to protect the existing diversity of these rapidly declining mandarin orange resources in northeast India.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262121000162.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Padma Rabha and other orchard owners for allowing access to leaf samples used in the study. The authors thank Dr Akan Das and Priya Boro for help in sample collection. The authors also thank Krishna Das for help in the preparation of the map.

References

Alansi, S, Tarroum, M, Al-Qurainy, F, Khan, S and Nadeem, M (2016) Use of ISSR markers to assess the genetic diversity in wild medicinal Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) Willd. Collected from different regions of Saudi Arabia. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 30: 942947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkley, NA, Roose, ML, Krueger, RR and Federici, CT (2006) Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Theoretical Applied Genetics 112: 15191531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernet, GP, Fernandez-Ribacoba, J, Carbonell, EA and Asins, MJ (2010) Comparative genome-wide segregation analysis and map construction using a reciprocal cross design to facilitate citrus germplasm utilization. Molecular Breeding 25: C659C673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwat, RM, Banu, S, Dholakia, BB, Kadoo, NY, Lagu, MD and Gupta, VS (2014) Evaluation of genetic variability in Symplocos laurina Wall. From two biodiversity hotspots of India. Plant Systematics and Evolution 300: 22392247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhandari, HR, Bhanu, NA, Srivastava, K, Singh, MN and Shreya, HA (2017) Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants. An overview. Advances in Plants and Agriculture Research 7: 00255.Google Scholar
Bonin, A, Ehrich, D and Manel, S (2007) Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: a toolbox for molecular ecologists and evolutionists. Molecular Ecology 16: 37373758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campos, ET, Espinosa, MAG, Warburton, ML, Varela, AS and Monter, AV (2005) Characterization of mandarin (Citrus spp.) using morphological and AFLP markers. Interciencia 30: 687693.Google Scholar
ColettaFilho, HD, Machado, MA, Targon, M and Pompeu, J Jr (2000) The use of random amplified polymorphic DNA to evaluate the genetic variability of Ponkan mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) accessions. Genetics and Molecular Biology 23: 169172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshmukh, NA, Patel, RK, Krishnappa, R, Verma, BC, Rymbai, H, Assumi, SR, Lyngdoh, P, Jha, AK and Malhotra, SK (2017) Influence of rootstock age and propagation methods on scion physiology and root morphology of Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87: 203209.Google Scholar
Deshpande, AU, Apte, GS, Bahulikar, RA, Lagu, MD, Kulkarni, BG, Suresh, HS, Singh, NP, Rao, MKV, Gupta, VS, Pant, A and Ranjekar, PK (2001) Genetic diversity across natural populations of three montane plant species from the Western Ghats, India revealed by inter simple sequence repeats. Molecular Ecology 10: 23972408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, JJ and Doyle, JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 1315.Google Scholar
Ghosh, SP (1977) Citrus industry of north east India. Punjab Horticultural Journal 17: 1321.Google Scholar
Govindaraj, M, Vetriventhan, M and Srinivasan, M (2015) Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: an overview of its analytical perspectives. Genetics Research International 431487: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grativol, C, Lira-Medeiros, CD, Hemerly, AS and Ferreira, PCG (2011) High efficiency and reliability of inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers for evaluation of genetic diversity in Brazilian cultivated Jatropha curcas L. accessions. Molecular Biology Report 38: 42454256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamrick, JL and Godt, MJW (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transitions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 351: 12911298.Google Scholar
Han, YC, Teng, CZ, Zhong, S, Zhou, MQ, Hu, ZL and Song, YC (2007) Genetic variation and clonal diversity in populations of Nelumbo nucifera (Nelumbonaceae) in central China detected by ISSR markers. Aquatic Botany 86: 6975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazarika, TK (2012) Citrus genetic diversity of north-east India, their distribution, ecogeography and ecobiology. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 59: 12671280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogbin, PM and Peakall, R (1999) Evaluation of the conservation of genetic research to the management of endangered plant Zieria prostrata. Conservative Biology 13: 514522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, Z, Khadija, F, Aziz, A, Khan, MN, Salik, MR and Anwar, R (2017) Evaluation of different grafting methods to citrus cultivars. Citrus Research & Technology 38: 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, J and Agarwal, V (2019) Assessment of genetic diversity, population structure and sex identification in dioecious crop, Trichosanthes dioica employing ISSR, SCoT and SRAP markers. Heliyon 5: e01346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Jena, SN and Nair, NK (2010) ISSR polymorphism in Indian wild orange (Citrus indica Tanaka, Rutaceae) and related wild species in North-east India. Scientia Horticulturae 123: 350359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamare, A and Rao, SR (2015) Efficacy of RAPD, ISSR and DAMD markers in assessment of genetic variability and population structure of wild Musa acuminata Colla. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 21: 349358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, M, Zhao, Z and Miao, XJ (2013) Genetic variability of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) populations in the Ili Valley as revealed by ISSR markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60: 22932302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, SK, Chaudhury, R, Kumar, S, Dhariwal, OP and Bhandari, DC (2012) Mandarins. In: Malik, SK, Chaudhury, R, Kumar, S, Dhariwal, OP and Bhandari, DC (eds) Citrus Genetic Resources in India: Present Status and Management. New Delhi, India: National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 27.Google Scholar
Malik, SK, Kumar, S, Singh, IP, Dhariwal, OP and Chaudhury, R (2013) Socio-economic importance, domestication trends and in situ conservation of wild Citrus species of Northeast India. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60: 16551671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marak, CK and Laskar, MA (2010) Analysis of phenetic relationship between Citrus indica Tanaka and a few commercially important Citrus species by ISSR markers. Scientia Horticulturae 124: 345348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meena, B, Singh, N, Mahar, KS, Sharma, YK and Rana, TS (2019) Molecular analysis of genetic diversity and population genetic structure in Ephedra foliata: an endemic and threatened plant species of arid and semi-arid regions of India. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants: An International Journal of Functional Plant Biology 25: 753764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, MP (1997) Tools for Population Genetic Analysis (TFPGA) 1.3: a Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Distributed by the author, Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Miller, AJ and Gross, BL (2011) From forest to field: perennial fruit crop domestication. American Journal of Botany 98: 13891414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mondal, B and Saha, R (2014) Identification of zygotic and nucellar seedlings of Citrus reticulata and Citrus aurantifolia using RAPD. International Journal of Advance Biotechnological Research 5: 2530.Google Scholar
Munankarmi, NN, Rana, N, Bhattarai, T, Shrestha, RL, Joshi, BK, Baral, B and Shrestha, S (2018) Characterization of the genetic diversity of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia (Christm.) Swingle) cultivars of eastern Nepal using inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Plants 7: 46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. The American Naturalist 106: 283292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 70: 33213323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M (1987) Genetic distance and molecular phylogeny. In: Ryman, N and Utter, F (eds) Population Genetics and Fishery Management. Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 193223.Google Scholar
Nilkanta, H, Amom, T, Tikendra, L, Rahaman, H and Nongdam, P (2017) ISSR marker based population genetic study of Melocanna baccifera (Roxb.) Kurz: a commercially important bamboo of Manipur, North-East India. Scientifica 2: 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nybom, H (2004) Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molecular Ecology 13: 11431155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nybom, H and Bartish, IV (2000) Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3: 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oueslati, A, Salhi-Hannachi, A, Luro, F, Vignes, H, Mournet, P and Ollitrault, P (2017) Genotyping by sequencing reveals the interspecific C. maxima/C. reticulata admixture along the genomes of modern citrus varieties of mandarins, tangors, tangelos, orangelos and grapefruits. PLoS ONE 12: e0185618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pal, D, Malik, SK, Kumar, S, Choudhary, R, Sharma, KC and Chaudhury, R (2013) Genetic variability and relationship studies of mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) using morphological and molecular markers. Agricultural Research 2: 236245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, RK, Babu, KD, Singh, A, Yadav, DS and De, LC (2010) Soft wood grafting in mandarin (C. reticulata Blanco): a novel vegetative propagation technique. International Journal of Fruit Science 10: 5464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peakall, R and Smouse, PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel: population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, E, Navarro, A, Ollitrault, P and Pena, L (2011) Pollen competition as a reproductive isolation barrier represses transgene flow between compatible and co-flowering citrus genotypes. PLoS One 6: e25810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajwade, AV, Arora, RS, Kadoo, NY, Harsulkar, AM, Ghorpade, PB and Gupta, VS (2010) Relatedness of Indian flax genotypes (Linum usitatissimum L.): an inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) primer assay. Molecular Biotechnology 45: 161170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahsavar, AR, Izadpanah, K, Tafazoli, E and Tabatabaei, BE (2007) Characterization of Citrus germplasm including unknown variants by Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers. Scientia Horticulturae 112: 310314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharafi, AA, Abkenar, AA, Sharafi, A and Masaeli, M (2016) Genetic variation assessment of acid lime accessions collected from south of Iran using SSR and ISSR molecular markers. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 22: 8795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharafi, AA, Abkenar, AA and Sharafi, A (2017) Molecular genetic diversity assessment of Citrus species grown in Iran revealed by SSR, ISSR and CAPS molecular markers. Journal of Scientific Research 2: 2227.Google Scholar
Singh, N, Choudhury, DR, Singh, AK, Kumar, S, Srinivasan, K, Tyagi, RK, Singh, NK and Singh, R (2013) Comparison of SSR and SNP markers in estimation of genetic diversity and population structure of Indian rice varieties. PLoS ONE 8: e84136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, AK, MeeteiNg, T, Singh, BK and Mandal, N (2016) Khasi mandarin: its importance, problems and prospects of cultivation in North-eastern Himalayan region. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology 9: 573592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, SK, Chhajer, S, Pathak, R, Bhatt, RK and Kalia, RK (2017) Genetic diversity of Indian jujube cultivars using SCoT, ISSR, and rDNA markers. Tree Genetics & Genomes 13: 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M (1985) Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39: 5365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slatkin, M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science (New York, N.Y.) 236: 787792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, JSC, Chin, ECL, Shu, H, Smith, OS, Wall, SJ, Senior, ML, Mitchell, SE, Kresovich, S and Ziegle, J (1997) An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.) comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 163173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatikonda, L, Wani, SP, Kannan, S, Beerelli, N, Sreedevi, TK, Hoisington, DA, Devi, P and Varshney, RK (2009) AFLP-based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Science 176: 505513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uchoi, A, Malik, SK, Choudhary, R, Kumar, S, Pal, D, Rohini, MR and Chaudhury, R (2017) Molecular markers in assessing genetic variation of Indian citron (Citrus medica L.) cultivars collected from different parts of India. Indian Journal of Biotechnology 16: 346356.Google Scholar
Uzun, A, Gulsen, O, Yesiloglu, T, Akakacar, Y and Tuzcu, O (2010) Distinguishing grapefruit and pummelo accessions using ISSR markers. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 46: 170177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, S and Rana, TS (2011) Genetic diversity within and among the wild populations of Murraya koenigii L. Spreng., as revealed by ISSR analysis. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 39: 139144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X, Xing, S, Xiao-jing Liu, LS and Kong, Q (2015) Genetic diversity of Styrax obassia Sieb. Et Zucc. Based on AFLP markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 61: 2834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, W, Li, J, Zheng, D, Friedman, C and Wang, H (2019) Analysis of genetic population structure and diversity in Mallotus oblongifolius using ISSR and SRAP markers. Peer Journal 7: 7173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yap, IV and Nelson, RJ (1996) Winboot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI Discussion Paper, Series, vol 14, IRRI, Manila.Google Scholar
Yeh, FC, Yang, RC and Boyle, T (2000). POPGENE version 1.32: Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Centre for International Forestry Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Yu, Y, Chen, C, Huang, M, Yu, Q, Du, D, Mattia, MR and Gmitter, FG (2018) Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of citrus germplasm with single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 143: 399408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Kamrup, Assam, India, showing geographic locations of the sampled populations.

Figure 1

Table 1. Details of polymorphic ISSR markers used in the study

Figure 2

Table 2. Characteristics of polymorphic ISSR markers used in the study

Figure 3

Table 3. Polymorphism parameters estimated using ISSR marker data

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Principal Coordinate Analysis of Khasi mandarin populations.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. UPGMA cluster analysis of Khasi mandarin populations collected from 10 locations in Kamrup and Kamrup (M), Assam using the distance matrix generated using Nei's (1972) algorithm. The percent values refer to bootstrap values.

Supplementary material: File

Kashyap et al. supplementary material

Kashyap et al. supplementary material

Download Kashyap et al. supplementary material(File)
File 93.2 KB