Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:43:45.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Who's who’ in renal sphaerosporids (Bivalvulida: Myxozoa) from common carp, Prussian carp and goldfish – molecular identification of cryptic species, blood stages and new members of Sphaerospora sensu stricto

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2012

ASTRID SIBYLLE HOLZER*
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
P. BARTOŠOVÁ
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
H. PECKOVÁ
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
T. TYML
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
S. ATKINSON
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
J. BARTHOLOMEW
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
D. SIPOS
Affiliation:
nstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1143 Budapest, Hungary
E. ESZTERBAUER
Affiliation:
nstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1143 Budapest, Hungary
I. DYKOVÁ
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic
*
*Corresponding author: Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branišovská 31, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Tel: +420 38777 5424. Fax: +420 38 5310388. E-mail: astrid.holzer@paru.cas.cz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Myxozoans are a group of diverse, spore-forming metazoan microparasites bound to aquatic environments. Sphaerospora dykovae (previously S. renicola) causes renal sphaerosporosis and acute swim bladder inflammation (SBI) in juvenile Cyprinus carpio carpio, in central Europe. A morphologically similar species with comparably low pathogenicity, S. angulata has been described from C. c. carpio, Carassius auratus auratus and Carassius gibelio. To clarify uncertainties and ambiguities in taxon identification in these hosts we decided to re-investigate differences in spore morphology using a statistical approach, in combination with SSU and LSU rDNA sequence analyses. We found that developing spores of S. angulata and S. dykovae cannot be distinguished morphologically and designed a duplex PCR assay for the cryptic species that demonstrated S. dykovae is specific to C. c. carpio, whereas S. angulata infects C. a. auratus and C. gibelio. The molecular identification of myxozoan blood stages in common carp and goldfish, which had previously been ascribed to Sphaerospora spp. showed that approximately 75% of blood stages were from non-sphaerosporid coelozoic species infecting these cyprinids and more than 10% were from an alien species, Myxobilatus gasterostei, developing in sticklebacks. We hereby report non-selective myxozoan host invasion and multi-species infections, whose role in SBI still requires clarification.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

INTRODUCTION

Myxozoans are diverse and widely distributed metazoan microparasites that alternate between vertebrate (predominantly fish) and invertebrate hosts (oligochaetes, polychaetes and bryozoans), in a variety of aquatic environments. Traditionally, myxozoan taxonomy has relied on spore morphology to define genera; however, molecular phylogenetics proved that most traditional myxozoan genera are polyphyletic (Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, Sommerville and Wootten2004; Fiala, Reference Fiala2006). Thereby, the genus or morphotype Sphaerospora Thélohan, 1892 is probably the most polyphyletic of all, with representatives in 6 different phylogenetic clades of the Myxozoa (recently re-analysed by Bartošová et al. Reference Bartošová, Freeman, Yokoyama, Caffara and Fiala2011a). Most Sphaerospora spp., including the type species Sphaerospora elegans Thélohan, 1892 infect the urinary tract and cluster together in a basal phylogenetic clade, termed Sphaerospora sensu stricto (Jirků et al. Reference Jirků, Fiala and Modry2007). The members of Sphaerospora s. str. show as a common feature extremely long expansion segments in the shape of linear helices in 2 variable regions of the SSU rRNA (Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, Wootten and Sommerville2007).

Renal sphaerosporosis in carp, Cyprinus carpio carpio L. in Europe was first described in Hungary by Molnár (Reference Molnár1980a), who related the observed pathological changes in the kidney to Sphaerospora angulata Fujita, Reference Fujita1912, a myxozoan originally described from the renal tubules of carp C. c. carpio and goldfish Carassius auratus auratus (L.) in Sapporo, Japan (Fujita, Reference Fujita1912). Shortly afterwards Lom and Dyková (Reference Lom and Dyková1982) described this intratubular myxozoan from carp kidney as a new species, Sphaerospora renicola, on the basis of morphological differences to S. angulata. Due to the demise of the genus Leptotheca Thélohan, 1895 (Gunter and Adlard, Reference Gunter and Adlard2010) S. renicola became a senior secondary homonym of a morphologically distinct species from Atlantic mackerel Scomber scombrus L. and the species described from carp was re-named Sphaerospora dykovae (Lom and Dyková, Reference Lom and Dyková1982) in honor of Professor Dyková who initially described it (Gunter and Adlard, Reference Gunter and Adlard2010). In morphological descriptions of spores from Hungarian carp, Molnár (Reference Molnár1980a,Reference Molnárb) stated that the spores were clearly angulate and similar to S. angulata, in contrast to S. dykovae, which was described as ‘globular’ (Lom and Dyková, Reference Lom and Dyková1982). Species differentiation in this case is of particular importance as S. angulata infections in goldfish have not been related to serious pathological changes, whereas S. dykovae causes renal sphaerosporosis in common carp and its proliferative, pre-sporogonic stages are the agents of acute and serious swim-bladder inflammation (SBI) (Körting, Reference Körting1982; Kovács-Gayer et al. Reference Kovács-Gayer, Csaba, Bekesi, Bucsek, Szakolczai and Molnár1982; Kovács-Gayer, Reference Kovács-Gayer1983; Körting and Hermanns, Reference Körting and Hermanns1984; Molnár and Kovács-Gayer, Reference Molnár and Kovács-Gayer1986). Another cycle of S. dykovae proliferation is supposed to occur in the blood (Csaba, Reference Csaba1976; Molnár, Reference Molnár1980a,Reference Molnárb; Kovács-Gayer et al. Reference Kovács-Gayer, Csaba, Bekesi, Bucsek, Szakolczai and Molnár1982; Lom et al. Reference Lom, Dyková and Pavlásková1983; Grupcheva et al. Reference Grupcheva, Dyková and Lom1985) although the transmission of these blood stages to SPF receptor fish did not always result in S. dykovae infection in the kidney (Molnár, Reference Molnár1980a; Körting et al. Reference Körting, Kruse and Steinhaben1989).

Sphaerospora spp. myxospores have few distinguishing morphological characteristics, and this has led to uncertainties and ambiguities in taxon identification. Molecular methods have considerably aided species differentiation in the myxozoans and have furthermore uncovered wrongly ascribed life-cycle stages (e.g. Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, Sommerville and Wootten2004; Bartošová et al. Reference Bartošová, Fiala, Cinková, Sipos, Eszterbauer, Jirku, Caffara, Fioravanti and lzer2011b). Only recently, the SSU rDNA sequence of S. dykovae was corrected in GenBank (named S. renicola, GenBank Accession number JF758875, Eszterbauer, Reference Eszterbauer2011) resulting in S. dykovae becoming a member of the Sphaerospora s. str. group. To clarify the identities of the renal sphaerosporids in common carp, Prussian carp and goldfish we decided to re-investigate differences in spore morphology using a statistical approach for morphometrics, in combination with molecular data from the same samples used for measurements. Herein, we provide full SSU and LSU rDNA sequences from the renal sphaerosporids in common carp, Prussian carp and goldfish from different geographic locations, thus resolving the ‘who's who’ and contributing new data on intraspecific sequence variability in the Sphaerospora s. str. clade. Furthermore, we provide molecular evidence for the identity of diverse, cryptic myxozoan blood stages in goldfish and carp.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fish species and sampling localities (detailed in Table 1)

Common carp, C. c. carpio (n = 142) were collected during September–November 2011, from 7 earthen ponds, most of which are used for commercial production of carp, in and around the South Bohemian region of the Czech Republic. Previously, 21 carp had been collected in a carp farm near Hortobágy (Hungary), in August 2009. Goldfish, C. a. auratus (n = 91) were sampled from 6 localities: Czech Republic (earthen ponds), North America (Oregon pet shop, fish reared in California) and from Australia (report and photographs from Professor Jiří Lom, number of fish unknown). Prussian carp, Carassius gibelio (Bloch) (n = 25) were sampled from 2 localities, one in the Czech Republic and another one in Hungary. All fish were transported to the laboratory whilst alive, euthanized on arrival by a Schedule 1 method and dissected.

Morphometric analyses of spores

Fresh kidney smears were examined by light microscopy and digital images of sphaerosporid spores in the tubular lumen were taken at ×1000 magnification. The same tissue smears from which digital images of spores were taken were used for DNA extraction. Spores were measured on digital images using ImageJ v.1·44p (Wayne Rasband, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij) calibrated against a digital image of a graticule. Measurements (n = 10–20 per fish locality) of spore length (SL), spore width (SW), spore thickness (ST), polar capsule length (PCL) and polar capsule width (PCW) were obtained following the guidelines of Arthur and Lom (Reference Arthur and Lom1989) and Sitja-Bobadilla and Alvarez-Pellitero (Reference Sitja-Bobadilla and Alvarez-Pellitero1994). Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the significance of morphological differences between sphaerosporid spores from common carp, goldfish and Prussian carp from different hosts and sites (Table 1). Absolute measurements were ln-transformed, and the ratios SL:ST and PCL:SL were arcsine square-root transformed and subjected to a Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance was used to conduct multiple comparisons and to determine significant differences between the morphometric data from different parasite species and localities. All statistical analyses were carried out using Statistica (StatSoft Inc.).

Table 1. Sphaerospora angulata and S. dykovae sample data: origin of fish, parasite prevalence and sequence data

rDNA sequencing

DNA was extracted from tissue smears of all fish that had small, round to oval plasmodia in the tubular lumen, whether mature spores were present or not. DNA was also extracted from tissue smears of 39 common carp and 66 goldfish that had no visible signs of infection. After microscopic examination, the cover slips were removed and tissues were collected in TNES urea buffer (Asahida et al. Reference Asahida, Kobayashi, Saitoh and Nakayama1996) where they were stored for 1–60 days. DNA was extracted using a simplified phenol-chloroform extraction protocol (Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, Sommerville and Wootten2004) and, after drying, DNA was re-dissolved in RNAse/DNAse-free water. rDNA sequences were amplified in nested PCRs using a series of primer combinations (Table 2). For complete SSU rDNA, 3 overlapping fragments were produced, whereas almost complete LSU rDNA was sequenced from 2 overlapping fragments. We used full SSU and partial LSU rDNA sequences for analysis of intraspecific sequence variability. PCRs were conducted in 10 μl reactions with 0·025 Uμl−1 Titanium Taq DNA polymerase and 10× buffer which contained 1·5 mm MgCl2 (BD Biosciences Clontech), with 0·2 mm of each dNTP, 0·5 mm of each primer, and 10–150 ng of template DNA. Denaturation of DNA (95 °C for 2 min) was followed by 30 cycles of amplification (95 °C for 40 s, annealing temperature (Table 2) for 40 s, and 68 °C for 1 min 50 s) and ended by a 4 min extension (68 °C). Direct sequencing of PCR products was attempted preferentially; if this failed, PCR amplicons were cloned into the pDrive Cloning vector (Qiagen PCR Cloning Kit, Germany) and transformed into the competent E. coli strain XL-1. Plasmids from 6 clones were sequenced per DNA sample.

Table 2. Primers and PCR conditions

Design of a specific duplex PCR and diagnosis of infections

Based on the SSU rDNA sequences obtained from the sphaerosporids in common carp, Prussian carp and goldfish specific primer pairs (Table 2) were designed amplifying products of 1058 bp (S. angulata) and of 552 bp (S. dykovae). The primers were tested for their complementarity and specificity, before use in the final duplex PCR assay. This assay used cycle conditions as above, except had an annealing temperature of 67 °C for 40 s and an elongation time of 50 s. We tested specificity of the duplex PCR assay against 11 other members of the Sphaerospora s. str. clade belonging to the genera Sphaerospora and Polysporoplasma Sitjà-Bobadilla and Alvarez-Pellitero, 1995 (unpublished data).

The specific primers SangR and SdykR were used also to confirm the identity of parasite stages in histological sections by in situ hybridization according to the protocol of Holzer et al. (Reference Holzer, Sommerville and Wootten2003).

Identification of blood stages

Blood smears of 122 carp and 91 goldfish were Giemsa stained and screened for the presence of myxozoan blood stages. Blood from all these fish was also used for DNA extraction. We used a nested PCR assay which non-specifically amplifies partial myxozoan SSU rDNA to identify these stages and to compare the thresholds of PCR versus microscopical detection. First-round primers were ERIB1 and ERIB10, followed by a nested second round that used primers MyxGP2F and Act1R (Table 1). The same PCR assay was used to amplify SSU rDNA for sequencing of the other myxozoan taxa that were detected in the fish.

Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analyses

For analysis of intraspecific variability, full SSU and partial LSU rDNA sequences of different isolates of each sphaerosporid species were self-assembled and aligned in SeqMan II (DNASTAR, Inc.). Alignments were checked and manually corrected in BioEdit 7.0.5.2 (Hall, Reference Hall1999). For phylogenetic analyses, the newly obtained SSU rDNA sequences of Sphaerospora spp. and of the other myxozoan taxa were aligned with published sequences of representatives of the four principle myxozoan phylogenetic clades (Fiala, Reference Fiala2006; Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, Wootten and Sommerville2007; Fiala and Bartošová, Reference Fiala and Bartošová2010; taxa and GenBank Accession numbers given in Fig. 3), using Clustal X ver. 1·83 (Thompson et al. Reference Thompson, Gibson, Plewniak, Jeanmougin and Higgins1997) with default parameters. The alignment was edited and ambiguous regions of the final alignment were identified by eye and excluded. The malacosporeans Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae Canning et al. 1999 and Buddenbrockia plumatellae Schröder, 1910 were used as outgroup. Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was performed in PAUP* 4.b10 (Swofford, Reference Swofford2001) using a heuristic search with random addition of taxa, the ACCTRAN option and the TBR swapping algorithm. All characters were treated as unordered, Ts/Tv ratio was set to 1:2 and gaps were treated as missing data. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed in RA × ML (Stamatakis, Reference Stamatakis2006) using the GTRGAMMA model (log likelihood = 14761·041543, gamma shape = 0·483849). Bootstrap support values were based on 1000 (MP) and 500 (ML) replicates, with random sequence additions. Bayesian inference (BI) was conducted in MrBayes v. 3.0 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck Reference Ronquist and Huelsenbeck2003) employing the GTR + Γ + I evolutionary model. Posterior probabilities were estimated from 1 000 000 generations via 2 independent runs of 4 simultaneous Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations with every 100th tree saved. Tracer v.1.4.1 (Drummond and Rambaut, Reference Drummond and Rambaut2007) was used to ascertain the length of the burn-in period, which was set to 12 000 generations.

RESULTS

Infection prevalence (Table 1)

Pseudoplasmodia containing refractile granules and/or 2 sphaerosporid spores were observed in the renal tubules of 16 common carp from 4 localities, in 15 goldfish (+unknown number of goldfish from Australia, images of Professor Lom) from 4 localities and in 2 Prussian carp from 2 localities. Infection prevalences at the different localities was 8·3% – 42·8% in common carp, 10·7% – 58·3% in goldfish and 5·9% – 12·5% in Prussian carp.

Spore morphology and morphometrics (Table 3; Figure 1)

In goldfish and Prussian carp sphaerosporid spores (Fig. 1A and B) were triangular, had convex sides and were slightly pointed at the mid-posterior margin of the spore. This triangular shape is caused by valvulogenic cell nuclei, located laterally on posterior part of the spore, and is distinct in both semi-mature and mature spores, in which the nuclei were considerably smaller but were still visible and shape-determinant. The sporoplasm consisted of 2 separate cells, each with 1 nucleus. Polar capsules were pyriform, of slightly different sizes, and each contained a filament that formed 4–5 coils. After comparison with published reports (Table 3) we ascribed this species to S. angulata with which our data were identical, also regarding size and shape. The present study and previous reports show that the polar capsule length constitutes 46–51% of the full length of the spore. Molecular data provided proof that the sphaerosporids from goldfish and Prussian carp are conspecific (see below).

Fig. 1. Spore morphology of S. angulata (A and B) and S. dykovae (C and D). (A and C) Maturing spores with bulges on posterior end of spore due to the location of the large valvular nuclei. (B and D) Fully mature spores with no visible (S. dykovae) or only small (S. angulata) valvular nuclei remnants. Small schematic drawings showing overall shape and relationship of size of polar capsules to size of spore for both spore developmental stages of both species; notice similarity of maturing spore stages.

Table 3. Description and morphometrical data of Sphaerospora angulata and S. dykovae myxospores

(Comparison of measurements obtained in the present study with published records (SL, spore length; SP, spore width; ST, spore thickness; PC, polar capsule; PCL, polar capsule length; PCW, polar capsule width; PF, polar filament.)

Notes: (A) type record, (B) includes the data of Fujita (Reference Fujita1912) and Molnár (Reference Molnár1980a), (C) probably S. angulata in C. a. auratus and C. gibelio and S. dykovae in C. carpio haematopterus, (D) originally called S. angulata.

In common carp, the shape of the sphaerosporid spores varied greatly (Fig. 1C and D, Table 3): Spores in early stages of maturation were angulate and had relatively large valve cell nuclei at the posterior part of the spore, as observed in S. angulata (Fig. 1C). The pyriform polar capsules of these spores were of equal size and made up 44–45% of the spore length. Fully mature spores were completely spherical (Fig. 1D) and occasionally demonstrated 2 tiny ‘tubercules’ laterally on the posterior part of the spores. Polar capsules in the spherical spore type were considerably smaller in relation to the spore size, measuring only 36% of the spore length (Fig. 1D, Table 3). This morphology matched with S. dykovae (Lom and Dyková, Reference Lom and Dyková1982). Our molecular analyses showed that all spore morphologies observed in the renal tubules of C. c. carpio represent the same species, S. dykovae.

Mature spores of both species were more compact and thus slightly smaller than immature spores. The schemata provided in Fig. 1 show that developing spores of S. dykovae and S. angulata are virtually indistinguishable, which was confirmed in the statistical analysis of the morphometrical data (see below). In both species, S. angulata and S. dykovae, an ephemeral vacuole was frequently observed at the posterior end of the developing spore, which disappeared on full maturation. This feature was previously mentioned in the original description of S. dykovae only (Lom and Dyková, Reference Lom and Dyková1982).

Statistical analysis of morphometric data

Analyses of variance of 5 metrical features and 2 relative proportions/ratios showed that the sphaerosporids from common carp, Prussian carp and goldfish are morphometrically indistinguishable with respect to spore length, spore width, spore thickness and the ratio between spore length and thickness. However, significant differences were observed in both polar capsule length (P = 0·0004) and width (P = 0·0003), and the ratio between polar capsule length and spore length (P = 0·0001), between mature (spherical) spores of S. dykovae and all other spores: immature S. dykovae and immature and mature S. angulata. The PCA included all absolute measurements and ratios and showed that the first 2 principal components explained 89·51% of the variation in the dataset (component I: 58·16%, component II: 31·35%). A plot of the data in the first plane of the PCA (Fig. 2) confirmed that S. angulata and S. dykovae are morphologically inseparable. Only the group that corresponds to S. dykovae mature spores is clearly separated from the remainder of S. dykovae and S. angulata (Fig. 2, white triangles). The PCA shows that the measurements were widely dispersed, especially along the first principal component, which is mainly related to size. Polar capsule length and width had the highest coefficient on the first component, while the ratio between spore length and polar capsule length was most influential for the distribution of the data along the second principal component.

Fig. 2. Plot of the first two principal components of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of 5 measurements (spore length, spore width, spore thickness, polar capsule length, polar capsule width; ln-transformed) and 2 ratios (spore length:spore thickness, polar capsule length:spore length; arcsine square-root transformed) obtained from S. angulata (immature spores, black dots; mature spores, white dots) and S. dykovae (immature spores, black triangles; mature spores, white triangles).

rDNA sequence data, sequence variability and duplex PCR assay results

Complete SSU rDNA sequences were obtained from 6 isolates of S. angulata and 3 isolates of S. dykovae. Almost complete LSU rDNA sequences were produced for 1 isolate of each species, and partial LSU rDNA sequences including variable domains D1–D6 were produced from 6 S. angulata isolates and from 7 S. renicola isolates (Table 1). The SSU rDNA sequences demonstrated extremely long expansion segments in variable regions V4 and V7, resulting in total lengths of 3469 bp for S. angulata and 3163 bp for S. dykovae. These sequences represent the longest myxozoan SSU rDNA sequences published to date. The partial SSU rDNA sequence provided for S. dykovae (Eszterbauer, Reference Eszterbauer2011) was found to be almost identical with the ones provided in the present study.

In the SSU rDNA of S. angulata, within species sequence variability was found to be lower between the European isolates (0·1–0·4% sequence divergence; 3–10/3383 bp) than between European and Californian isolates with (0·5–0·7% divergence; 17–24/3383 bp), independent from the host species (C. a. auratus and C. gibelio). In S. dykovae, SSU rDNA sequences differed by 0·1–0·4% (3–15/3092 bp) between European isolates, which was in the same range as for S. angulata. LSU rDNA data were obtained only for European isolates. LSU rDNA sequences differed by 0–0·7% (0–16/2725 bp) for S. angulata and 0·2–0·8% (3–22/2721 bp) for S. dykovae. Hence the LSU rDNA gene region had twice the variation as the SSU. LSU rDNA sequence divergence was the same within hosts from the same pond as between localities.

The duplex PCR assay designed for the 2 sphaerosporids did not cross-react with any of the 11 members of Sphaerospora s. str. we tested, and it specifically amplified only S. dykovae and S. angulata. The assay demonstrated that goldfish and Prussian carp were infected exclusively with S. angulata and common carp exclusively with S. dykovae. In situ hybridization showed that the specific primers only bound to intratubular stages of the parasite in the respective hosts (data not shown).

Molecular identification of myxozoan blood stages and other myxozoan taxa

Myxozoan blood stages also called C-cells or unidentified blood objects (UBOs) were detected in Giemsa-stained blood smears of 20% (28/142) of common carp and in 35% (15/43) of goldfish. PCR proved to be more sensitive and detected myxozoan DNA in the blood of 43% (61/142) of common carp and 58% (25/43) of goldfish. However, the non-specific PCR assay did amplify myxozoan DNA in all microscopically positive samples. We matched all but 1 of the sequences obtained from the blood with myxozoan sequences in GenBank or from the present study (Table 4). Thereby, the SSU rDNA sequences obtained from blood isolates were found to be identical with a maximum of 3 bp difference from published sequences. Sphaerospora s. str. blood stages were usually detected together with other myxozoans in the same sample as evidenced by different amplicon sizes on the gel (∼1500 bp versus ∼900 bp). Sequence chromatograms of the 900 bp sequences had mixed peaks (i.e. multiple amplicons) in 9 carp and 11 goldfish, which were then excluded from the analyses.

Table 4. Molecular analysis of blood stages detected in C. c. carpio and C. a. auratus – species identification and prevalence

S. dykovae and S. angulata made up no more than 24·6% and 19·3%, respectively, of the blood stages in their respective hosts. The only evidence of cross-infection between the two species was the detection of S. angulata DNA in the blood of a single carp. The majority of myxozoan blood stages were identified as coelozoic species inhabiting the urinary and biliary systems of carp and goldfish. Buddenbrockia sp. Schröder, 1910 represented the most common blood-stage prevalences of 26·5% (carp) and 27·7% (goldfish). Bile-inhabiting myxozoans accounted for 4·3–8·8% of myxozoan blood stages and comprised the species Zschokkella nova Klokacewa, 1914, Zschokkella sp., Chloromyxum cristatum Léger, 1906 and Chloromyxum auratum Hallett et al. Reference Hallett and Bartholomew2006. Surprisingly, Myxobilatus gasterostei (Parisi, 1912), a myxozoan from the urinary system of the three-spined stickleback, represented more than 10% of blood stages in both hosts. Only a single histozoic species, i.e. Myxobolus encephalicus (Mulsow, 1911) was detected in the blood, a myxozoan which was present exclusively in carp. In carp, blood stages of an unidentified myxozoan with phylogenetic affinities to S. dykovae and S. angulata were relatively common (14·7%).

We obtained partial SSU rDNA sequences of Hoferellus carassii Akhmerov, 1960 from large spore-forming plasmodia detected in the urinary bladder of carp and goldfish, and from M. encephalicus spores that occurred in large masses in the brain of 1 carp. The sequence of M. encephalicus was found to be nearly identical (3/820 bp divergence) with that of the ‘old’ S. dykovae isolate in GenBank (Myxosporea sp. EE-2004 AY735410, Eszterbauer and Székely, Reference Eszterbauer and Székely2004).

Phylogenetic relationships

Our final alignment consisted of 1466 characters (33·8% of the original alignment), from which 817 were variable and 688 were parsimony-informative. The MP analysis resulted in a single most parsimonious tree with a length of 3801 steps. Tree topology (Fig. 3) comprised 4 well-defined clades, previously defined as malacosporean, Sphaerospora s. str., marine myxosporean and freshwater myxosporean. In the present analysis, Sphaerospora s. str. appears as a sister clade to the marine myxosporeans; however, this position receives low support. The analyses clearly demonstrate that S. dykovae and S. angulata as well as the unidentified myxozoan SSU rDNA sequence detected in the blood are well-supported members of the Sphaerospora s. str. clade. They form a group of closely related cyprinid-infecting sphaerosporids in a sister relationship with Sphaerospora truttae Fischer, Scherl, El-Matbouli & Hoffmann, 1986 and Sphaerospora elegans (Parisi, 1912) from the kidney tubules of trout and stickleback. The other myxozoans identified from the blood of carp and goldfish are of diverse phylogenetic origins and cluster amongst the members of the malacosporean, the Sphaerospora s. str. and the freshwater myxosporean clade (Fig. 3, arrows). Our partial H. carassii SSU rDNA sequence was excluded from the analysis as it was found to be unstable with regard to its exact position in the freshwater clade.

Fig. 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 49 myxozoan SSU rDNA sequences; GenBank Accession numbers in parenthesis; taxa with new sequences are in bold and myxozoans identified in the blood are marked with an arrow. Note that S. dykovae and S. angulata as well as the unidentified myxozoan detected in the blood cluster within the Sphaerospora s. str. clade. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood bootstrap values (BS) and Bayesian inference posterior probabilities (BPP) are shown at nodes. Nodes with BS⋝95 and BPP⋝0·98 have bold branches. Weakly supported nodes (BS < 50, BPP < 0·70) are represented with dashes or blanks. Malacosporeans (Mal.) were used as outgroup. Scale bar = 0·1 substitution per site.

DISCUSSION

Molecular versus morphological data indicate the existence of cryptic sphaerosporid species

Myxozoan taxonomy has typically followed a morphological species concept, based on characteristics of the myxosporean spore, formed in the vertebrate host. As extremely reduced parasitic organisms, myxozoans demonstrate a simple spore morphology with an average of 6 cells that limit the number of physical characteristics and measurements that can be taken. Most characters are continuous (e.g. length measurements or ratios), and overlapping character variation can encumber species delimitation. As distinguishing traits are rare, re-identification of previously described taxa is sometimes problematic. Our results show that it is not possible to distinguish species of maturing, angular, sphaerosporid spores in the renal tubules of goldfish, Prussian carp and carp. Hence, we incorporated rDNA sequences as an additional data set, which clearly resolved 2 distinct Sphaerospora spp. in these hosts. Our study is a further example of the usefulness of molecular data for determining species limits in taxa which are poor in reliable morphological characters as, for example, malaria parasites (Martinsen et al. Reference Martinsen, Waite and Schall2007; Singh and Simon, Reference Singh and Simon Divis2009; Valkiūnas et al. Reference Valkiūnas, Santiago-Alarcon, Levin, Iezhova and Parker2010).

Within the myxozoans, a similar case of cryptic speciation as in the present study, with extremely similar spore morphotypes representing different genotypes has been reported for gill-infecting Myxobolus spp. (Molnár et al. Reference Molnár, Marton, Székely and Eszterbauer2010) and bile-inhabiting Chloromyxum and Zschokkella spp. (Bartošová and Fiala, Reference Bartošová and Fiala2011). On the other hand, different spore morphotypes have been related to the same genotype (Hallett et al. Reference Hallett, Atkinson and El-Matbouli2002; George- Nascimento et al. Reference George-Nascimento, Lobos, Torrijos and Khan2004; Eszterbauer et al. Reference Eszterbauer, Marton, Rácz, Letenyei and Molnár2006). This stresses the importance of providing a characterization for myxozoan taxa which is based on the synopsis of morphology and molecular data.

Morphological convergence among taxa can be expected as a response to similar selection pressures (Price et al. Reference Price, Lovette, Bermingham, Gibbs and Richman2000; Van Buskirk, Reference Van Buskirk2002). As most Sphaerospora spp. infect the urinary system, predominantly the tubular lumen, it can be expected that adaptation to this environment favours the spherical shape and thus morphological convergence, as in the present case. The supposed ancient spore shape and site of infection of sphaerosporids (Fiala and Bartošová, Reference Fiala and Bartošová2010) have received little modification during the evolution of myxozoan taxa, possibly due to continuing success. Thereby, the success of sphaerosporids may be based on several factors such as, for example, rapid initial proliferation in the blood, which provides a rich source of amino acids without penetration of host cells, or spore formation in an immunoprivileged coelozoic site (Sitja-Bobadilla, Reference Sitja-Bobadilla2008) with easy release into the environment via the urine of the host.

The present study provides the first evidence for speciation of Sphaerospora s. str. within cyprinids. High species diversity seems to occur in this host family (e.g. Lom and Dyková, Reference Lom and Dyková1982; Baska and Molnár, Reference Baska and Molnár1988) and recently obtained molecular data confirm this (unpublished observations).

‘Who's who’ in past and present reports?

Our current investigations into S. angulata and S. dykovae allow us to comment on previous studies of sphaerosporid parasites in goldfish and carp. In the original description of S. angulata, Fujita (Reference Fujita1912) stated, in the first section, related to Hoferellus carassii Akhmerov, 1960 (synonym Mitraspora cyprini Fujita, Reference Fujita1912) that he studied common carp and goldfish from small ponds in Japan. However, he gave no further host reference when providing the descriptive details of S. angulata. Fujita (Reference Fujita1912) described mature spores as angulate with polar capsules that differ in size. We thus consider the kidney sphaerosporid that we encountered in goldfish and Prussian carp to be S. angulata based on similar features. We considered the parasite from common carp to be S. dykovae which was originally described from this host (Lom and Dyková, Reference Lom and Dyková1982), even though we observed some differences in immature spores compared with the original description. We found that immature S. dykovae spores had an angular shape and larger polar capsules than mature spores; we used SSU and LSU rDNA sequencing to show both, immature and mature forms represent the same taxon. It remains unclear why the polar capsules in S. dykovae exhibit large size variation during spore development while those of S. angulata does not.

Previously, another SSU rDNA sequence was provided from the kidney of goldfish (initially named Sphaerospora sp., now re-named as Myxosporea sp. 2 EE-2004, AY735411; Eszterbauer and Székely, Reference Eszterbauer and Székely2004), which is identical with that of a Zschokkella sp. from the bile ducts of goldfish (DQ118776) and that of its alternate life-cycle stage, a guyenotia type actinosporean spore (Eszterbauer et al. Reference Eszterbauer, Marton, Rácz, Letenyei and Molnár2006; AY779063). The same species was identified as a blood stage in the present study. It is likely that, in the original study, Zschokkella sp. was preferentially amplified from the blood of goldfish kidney and mistaken for the sequence of S. angulata, which had visible myxospores in the kidney (Eszterbauer and Székely, Reference Eszterbauer and Székely2004). To avoid similar problems, considering the large number and diversity of myxozoan blood stages in carp and goldfish, we employed in situ hybridization with specific probes to confirm the identity of the sequences of S. dykovae and S. angulata. This method has also been applied by Eszterbauer (Reference Eszterbauer2011) to clarify the ambiguities with the SSU rDNA of S. dykovae (referred to as S. renicola), and it seems to be a reliable tool for confirming the localization and identity of myxozoan species.

Sphaerospora s. str. host specificity

Limited data are available on vertebrate host specificity of Sphaerospora spp. (Molnár, Reference Molnár1994). However, previous studies on Sphaerospora truttae Fischer-Scherl et al. 1986 showed that this parasite can develop in brown trout but not in rainbow trout (McGeorge et al. Reference McGeorge, Sommerville and Wootten1996). We suggest that most renal Sphaerospora spp. have a rather strict host specificity (unpublished data), similar to that in several other myxozoan genera, e.g. Ceratomyxa (Gunter et al. Reference Gunter, Whipps and Adlard2009; Alama-Bermejo et al. Reference Alama-Bermejo, Raga and Holzer2011). We demonstrated, by species-specific duplex PCR, that S. angulata parasitizes goldfish and Prussian carp, two very closely related host species (Papoušek, Reference Papoušek2008) which were long believed to be subspecies (C. auratus auratus and C. auratus gibelio), whereas S. dykovae infects exclusively the common carp. While we only studied a single site where goldfish and carp are cultured together, it is likely that Prussian carp is present also in most of the carp ponds studied (Lusková et al. Reference Lusková, Lusk, Halačka and Vetešník2010) so that cross-infection could be possible. We demonstrated the presence of S. angulata blood stages in 1 carp specimen but no kidney infection was detected in this fish, which suggests that this parasite can enter common carp but is not able to complete its development in the atypical host (see section on non-selective host invasion). Thus, in the case of S. dykovae and S. angulata, species distinction can probably be based on host record. We suggest that this host specificity is kept in mind when assessing previous reports (Table 3) of kidney sphaerosporids from goldfish, Prussian carp and common carp were addressed under the same name, S. angulata, prior to the description of S. dykovae (Lom and Dyková, Reference Lom and Dyková1982), while from 1982 onwards all reports referred to S. dykovae.

S. angulata appears to be a pan-global species, described from Asia in 1912 (Fujita, Reference Fujita1912) and from 3 other continents in the present study. This implies that the same invertebrate host species should be present all over the world as, at least for myxozoans developing in oligochaetes, host specificity is believed to be rather high (Özer et al. Reference Özer, Wootten and Shinn2002; Xiao et al. Reference Xiao and Desser1998; Yokoyama, Reference Yokoyama1997). However, the alternate hosts of Sphaerospora s. str. are yet to be discovered as experimentally determined life-cycle stages (Molnár et al. Reference Molnár, El Mansy, Szekely and Baska1999; Özer and Wootten, Reference Özer and Wootten2000) were later proven wrong by DNA sequencing of the supposed alternating life-cycle stages (Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, Sommerville and Wootten2004; Eszterbauer et al. Reference Eszterbauer, Marton, Rácz, Letenyei and Molnár2006).

Identity of myxozoan blood stages and common pathways in the fish host

The proliferative stages of myxozoans in the blood (short ‘blood stages’) were originally described by Csaba (Reference Csaba1976) and called C blood protozoans by Molnár (Reference Molnár1980a) and ‘unidentified blood objects’ (UBOs) by Lom et al. (Reference Lom, Dyková and Pavlásková1983). These stages have been observed consistently in the blood of common carp before renal sphaerosporosis. Proliferative blood stages have been reported from other Sphaerospora-infected cyprinids (Lom et al. Reference Grupcheva, Dyková and Lom1985; Baska and Molnár, Reference Baska and Molnár1988) and were long thought to be characteristic only for the genus Sphaerospora. However, Csaba et al. (Reference Csaba, Kovács-Gayer, Bekesi, Bucsek and Szakolczai1984) showed that 15–28% of common carp with myxozoan blood stages showed neither signs of SBI nor S. dykovae infection in the kidney. Furthermore, inoculation of SPF carp with blood stages did not always lead to S. dykovae development in the renal tubules (Molnár Reference Molnár1980a; Molnár and Kovács-Gayer, Reference Molnár and Kovács-Gayer1986). These data already indicated that not all blood stages were Sphaerospora spp. More recently, it has been demonstrated that species from all other major myxozoan phylogenetic lineages use the blood for proliferation or transport, e.g. Kent and Lom (Reference Kent and Lom1986), Holzer et al. (Reference Holzer, Sommerville and Wootten2006) and Björk and Bartholomew (Reference Björk and Bartholomew2010).

In a study of 3100 common carp from Czechoslovakia, 13 myxozoan species were detected in different organs and tissues (Dyková and Lom, Reference Dyková and Lom1988). In the light of these findings, blood stages from a variety of species could be expected to occur. We demonstrated by SSU rDNA sequencing that only 19·3% and 24·6% of the blood stages present in goldfish and carp belong to S. angulata and S. dykovae, respectively, and that the remaining 75·4–80·7% of blood stages were from 9 other myxozoan species.

In some cases, the general myxozoan primers that we used amplified multiple species simultaneously. Sphaerospora s. str. species produced distinct high molecular bands relative to other myxozoans (∼1500 bp versus ∼900 bp) and it is likely that the ∼900 bp band may be comprised of more than one myxozoan species. Our prevalence data may have been skewed by preferential PCR amplification of one species over another, as has been shown in studies of mixed infections of malaria parasites in birds (Valkiūnas et al. 2006). However, our intention was not to provide absolute prevalences for each species, rather to demonstrate that the blood stages previously ascribed to S. dykovae in common carp (Csaba et al. Reference Csaba, Kovács-Gayer, Bekesi, Bucsek and Szakolczai1984; Ter Hoefte et al. Reference Ter Höfte, Körting and Lehmann1984, Grupcheva et al. Reference Grupcheva, Dyková and Lom1985) may be proliferative stages of other myxozoan species. In 2 carp the number of blood stages was very high on Giemsa-stained smears, and both samples represented stages of M. encephalicus. Myxobolus spp. are histozoic and despite being very diverse in carp we only detected 1 species in the blood, which suggests that they do not generally use the circulatory system as a proliferation site or as a medium of transport to their target organ. A non-blood route for myxobolids is supported by the study of El-Matbouli et al. (Reference El-Matbouli, Hoffmann and Mandok1995) on the intrapiscine pathway of Myxobolus cerebralis Hofer 1903, which proliferates in the subcutis and migrates along nerve fibres to the brain and the cartilage of the head. Our results indicate that the blood stream is predominantly a pathway for coelozoic species, as previously demonstrated in other hosts (Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, Sommerville and Wootten2003, Reference Holzer, Sommerville and Wootten2006). The presence of blood stages of histozoic M. encephalicus was an exception to this rule. This parasite forms plasmodia in the blood vessels of the brain (Dyková et al. Reference Dyková, Lom and Cirkovic1986; Lom and Dyková, Reference Lom and Dyková2006) and we suspect that M. encephalicus plasmodia may become dislodged and are transported through the whole body via the blood. The presence of large numbers of M. encephalicus blood stages may explain why this species was preferentially amplified from kidney samples of common carp by Eszterbauer and Székely (Reference Eszterbauer and Székely2004).

It has to be pointed out that most of the fish analysed in the present study were obtained in October/November 2011, and we suspect that the presence and composition of blood stages is likely to vary both throughout the year (e.g. Grupcheva et al. Reference Grupcheva, Dyková and Lom1985; Sedlaczek et al. Reference Sedlaczek, Friede, Kluss and Vinzelberg1990; Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, Sommerville and Wootten2006) and according to cycles of vegetative reproduction of the parasites (Björk and Bartholomew, Reference Björk and Bartholomew2010). The latter was demonstrated also by Molnár and Kovács-Gayer (Reference Molnár and Kovács-Gayer1986) who observed large numbers of S. dykovae blood stages ⩾25 days after infection of receptor fish with swim-bladder isolates from SBI-affected fish, i.e. after spore formation (12 days p.i.) and after clearance of the infection from the kidney (32 days p.i.). This indicates that S. dykovae spore production in the kidney is followed by a new cycle of proliferation in the blood.

Proof for non-selective host invasion of myxozoans and multi-species infections

We identified ∼11% of myxozoan blood stages in both common carp and goldfish as M. gasterostei, a renal, intratubular parasite of the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that developmental myxozoan stages of a myxozoan infecting a distantly related host, were detected in an atypical host fish. This is a rather surprising result but may be explained by the recent findings of Kallert et al. (Reference Kallert, Bauer, Haas and El-Matbouli2011) who identified common fish mucus nucleosides as the main chemical stimulants for actinospore polar filament discharge, required for the initial step of the infection process. Kallert et al. (Reference Kallert, Eszterbauer, Grabner and El-Matbouli2009 and Reference Kallert, Bauer, Haas and El-Matbouli2011) and Yokoyama et al. (Reference Yokoyama, Ogawa and Wakabayashi1995) furthermore demonstrated that the subsequent entry of the fish-infective sporoplasms is non-host specific. Körting et al. (Reference Körting, Kruse and Steinhaben1989) injected myxozoan blood stages from goldfish into common carp, and found that these stages proliferated in the blood of the new host. While this data prompted Körting et al. (Reference Körting, Kruse and Steinhaben1989) to state that the renal sphaerosporids from carp and goldfish were conspecific, he never observed spore formation in the renal tubules of the receptor fish. In the present study, we did not observe Myxobilatus-type spores in any of the cyprinids studied, which strongly suggests that the development of this stickleback-specific myxozoan in the unsuitable hosts (carp and goldfish) is arrested before spore formation can take place. Körting's results (Körting et al. Reference Körting, Kruse and Steinhaben1989) suggest that some physiological triggers and nutritional adequacies are given and that these nutrients can be acquired by the parasites, thus allowing initial proliferation. Further studies are required to understand where and how the development of these incidental parasites is arrested in their unsuitable hosts and whether the alien parasite stages can cause pathological effects as known from other aquatic parasites, e.g. schistosomes causing cercarial dermatitis in humans (see review by Kolářová, Reference Kolářová2007).

Most studies of myxozoan host-parasite interactions focus on the effects of a single parasite on a single host, neglecting the host's interactions with other species. Multi-species infections may lead to either competition within the host and thus an increasing virulence over time (Read and Taylor, Reference Read and Taylor2001) or to co-existence with some intermediate virulence levels being established (May and Nowak, Reference May and Nowak1955). Considering our evidence of many different species in the blood of carp, it would be interesting to re-investigate the myxozoan agent(s) involved in SBI in common carp using molecular methods. SBI is still a problem in central Europe (Eszterbauer and Steinhagen, personal communication) although most reports date back to the 1980/90s when the aetiological agents of the disease were first investigated. The superior sensitivity and specificity associated with the use of molecular assays has greatly improved the field of infectious disease diagnostics by providing rapid, accurate results that permit identification of myxozoan species, independent from the stage of development. Using such tools, in the present study, we have characterized new members of Sphaerospora s. str. in carp, Prussian carp and goldfish, we shed light on the identity of myxozoan blood stages in these hosts and we provide the diagnostic tools to further analyse the relationship between these species and SBI in common carp.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This project was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (Center of Excellence grant 505/12/G112), by institutional funds, grant number Z60220518 (Institute of Parasitology, BC of the ASCR) and by a Post-Doctoral Fellowship to P.B. (Czech Science Foundation, grant number P506/11/P724). The work conducted in Hungary received financial support by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (grant number OTKA K75873).

References

REFERENCES

Alama-Bermejo, G., Raga, J. and Holzer, A. S. (2011). Host-parasite relationship of Ceratomyxa puntazzi n. sp (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) and sharpsnout seabream Diplodus puntazzo (Walbaum, 1792) from the Mediterranean with first data on ceratomyxid host specificity in sparids. Veterinary Parasitology 182, 181192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, R. and Lom, J. (1989). A guideline for the preparation of species descriptions in Myxosporea. Journal of Fish Diseases 12, 151156.Google Scholar
Asahida, T., Kobayashi, T., Saitoh, K. and Nakayama, I. (1996). Tissue preservation and total DNA extraction from fish stored at ambient temperature using buffers containing high concentration of urea. Fisheries Science 62, 727730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barta, J. R., Martin, D. S., Liberator, P. A., Dashkevicz, M., Anderson, J. W., Feighner, S. D., Elbrecht, A., Perkins-Barrow, A., Jenkins, M. C., Danforth, H. D., Ruff, M. D. and Profous-Juchelka, H. (1997). Phylogenetic relationships among eight Eimeria species infecting domestic fowl inferred using complete small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Journal of Parasitology 83, 262271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartošová, P., Fiala, I. and Hypša, V. (2009). Concatenated SSU and LSU rDNA data confirm the main evolutionary trends within myxosporeans (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) and provide effective tool for their molecular phylogenetics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53, 8193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartošová, P. and Fiala, I. (2011). Molecular evidence for the existence of cryptic species assemblages of several myxosporeans (Myxozoa). Parasitology Research 108, 573583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartošová, P., Fiala, I., Cinková, M., Sipos, E., Eszterbauer, E., Jirku, M., Caffara, M., Fioravanti, M. L. and lzer, A. S. (2011 b). Sphaerospora sensu stricto clade (Myxozoa): Taxonomy and phylogeny obased on the ribosomal and protein-coding data. Abstract Book, International Conference on Dieseases of Fish and Shellfish, Split, September 12–16, 2011, 62.Google Scholar
Bartošová, P., Freeman, M. A., Yokoyama, H., Caffara, M. and Fiala, I. (2011 a). Phylogenetic position of Sphaerospora testicularis and Latyspora scomberomori n. gen. n. sp (Myxozoa) within the marine urinary clade. Parasitology 138, 381393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baska, F. and Molnár, K. (1988). Blood stages of Sphaerospora spp. (Myxosporea) in cyprinid fishes. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 5, 2328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björk, S. J. and Bartholomew, J. L. (2010). Invasion of Ceratomyxa shasta (Myxozoa) and comparison of migration to the intestine between susceptible and resistant fish hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 10871095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csaba, G. (1976). An unidentifiable extracellular sporozoan parasite from the blood of the carp. Parasitologia Hungarica 9, 2124.Google Scholar
Csaba, G., Kovács-Gayer, E., Bekesi, L., Bucsek, M. and Szakolczai, J. (1984). Studies into the possible protozoan aetiology of swimbladder inflamation in carp fry. Journal of Fish Diseases 7, 3956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamant, A., Whipps, C. M. and Kent, M. L. (2004). A new species of Sphaeromyxa (Myxosporea : Sphaeromyxina : Sphaeromyxidae) in devil firefish, Pterois miles (Scorpaenidae), from the northern Red Sea: Morphology, ultrastructure, and phylogeny. Journal of Parasitology 90, 14341442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, A. J. and Rambaut, A. (2007). BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7, 214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyková, I. and Lom, J. (1988). Review of pathogenic myxosporeans in intensive culture of carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Europe. Folia Parasitologica 35, 289307.Google Scholar
Dyková, I., Lom, J. and Cirkovic, M. (1986). Brain myxoboliasis of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio) due to Myxobolus encephalicus. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 6, 1012.Google Scholar
El-Matbouli, M., Hoffmann, R. W. and Mandok, C. (1995). Light and electron-microscopic observations on the route of the Triactinomyxon sporoplasm of Myxobolus cerebralis from epidermis into rainbow trout cartilage. Journal of Fish Biology 46, 919935.Google Scholar
Eszterbauer, E. (2011). Molecular phylogeny of the kidney-parasitic Sphaerospora renicola from common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Sphaerospora sp. from goldfish (Carassius auratus auratus). Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 59, 409409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eszterbauer, E., Marton, S., Rácz, O. Z., Letenyei, M. and Molnár, K. (2006). Morphological and genetic differences among actinosporean stages of fish-parasitic myxosporeans (Myxozoa): difficulties of species identification. Systematic Parasitology 65, 97114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eszterbauer, E. and Székely, C. (2004). Molecular phylogeny of the kidney-parasitic Sphaerospora renicola from common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Sphaerospora sp from goldfish (Carassius auratus auratus). Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 52, 469478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiala, I. (2006). The phylogeny of Myxosporea (Myxozoa) based on small subunit ribosomal RNA gene analysis. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 15211534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiala, I. and Bartošová, P. (2010). History of myxozoan character evolution on the basis of rDNA and EF-2 data. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10, 228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiala, I. and Dyková, I. (2004). The phylogeny of marine and freshwater species of the genus Chloromyxum Mingazzini, 1890 (Myxosporea : Bivalvulida) based on small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Folia Parasitologica 51, 211214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujita, T. (1912). Notes on new sporozoan parasites of fishes. Zoologischer Anzeiger 37, 251261.Google Scholar
George-Nascimento, M., Lobos, V., Torrijos, C. and Khan, R. (2004). Species composition of assemblages of Ceratomyxa (Myxozoa), parasites of lings Genypterus (Ophidiidae) in the southeastern Pacific Ocean: An ecomorphometric approach. Journal of Parasitology 90, 13521355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabner, D. S. and El-Matbouli, M. (2010). Experimental transmission of malacosporean parasites from bryozoans to common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus). Parasitology 137, 629639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grupcheva, G., Dyková, I. and Lom, J. (1985). Seasonal fluctuation in the prevalence of Sphaerospora renicola and myxosporean blood-stream stages in carp fingerlings in Bulgaria. Folia Parasitologica 32, 193203.Google Scholar
Gunter, N. L., Whipps, C. M. and Adlard, R. D. (2009). Ceratomyxa (Myxozoa: Bivalvulida): Robust taxon or genus of convenience? International Journal for Parasitology 39, 13951405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunter, N. L. and Adlard, R. D. (2010). The demise of Leptotheca Thelohan, 1895 (Myxozoa: Myxosporea: Ceratomyxidae) and assignment of its species to Ceratomyxa Thelohan, 1892 (Myxosporea: Ceratomyxidae), Ellipsomyxa Koie, 2003 (Myxosporea: Ceratomyxidae), Myxobolus Butschli, 1882 and Sphaerospora Thelohan, 1892 (Myxosporea: Sphaerosporidae). Systematic Parasitology 75, 81104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 9598.Google Scholar
Hallett, S. L., Atkinson, S. D. and El-Matbouli, M. (2002). Molecular characterisation of two aurantiactinomyxon (Myxozoa) phenotypes reveals one genotype. Journal of Fish Diseases 25, 627631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, S. L. and Bartholomew, J. L. (2006). Application of a real-time PCR assay to detect and quantify the myxozoan parasite Ceratomyxa shasta in river water samples. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 71, 109118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holzer, A. S., Sommerville, C. and Wootten, R. (2003). Tracing the route of Sphaerospora truttae from the entry locus to the target organ of the host, Salmo salar L., using an optimized and specific in situ hybridization technique. Journal of Fish Diseases 26, 647655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzer, A. S., Sommerville, C. and Wootten, R. (2004). Molecular relationships and phylogeny in a community of myxosporeans and actinosporeans based on their 18S rDNA sequences. International Journal for Parasitology 34, 10991111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzer, A. S., Sommerville, C. and Wootten, R. (2006). Molecular studies on the seasonal occurrence and development of five myxozoans in farmed Salmo trutta L. Parasitology 132, 193205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holzer, A. S., Wootten, R. and Sommerville, C. (2007). The secondary structure of the unusually long 18S ribosomal RNA of the myxozoan Sphaerospora truttae and structural evolutionary trends in the Myxozoa. International Journal for Parasitology 37, 12811295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jirků, M., Fiala, I. and Modry, D. (2007). Tracing the genus Sphaerospora: rediscovery, redescription and phylogeny of the Sphaerospora ranae (Morelle, 1929) n. comb. (Myxosporea, Sphaerosporidae), with emendation of the genus Sphaerospora. Parasitology 134, 17271739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kallert, D. M., Bauer, W., Haas, W. and El-Matbouli, M. (2011). No shot in the dark: Myxozoans chemically detect fresh fish. International Journal for Parasitology 41, 271276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kallert, D. M., Eszterbauer, E., Grabner, D. and El-Matbouli, M. (2009). In vivo exposure of susceptible and non-susceptible fish species to Myxobolus cerebralis actinospores reveals non-specific invasion behaviour. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 84, 123130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, M. L. and Lom, J. (1986). Development of the PKX myxosporean in rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 1, 159182.Google Scholar
Kolářová, L. (2007). Schistosomes causing cercarial dermatitis: a mini-review of current trends in systematics and a host specificity and pathogenicity. Folia Parasitologica 54, 8187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovács-Gayer, E., Csaba, G., Bekesi, L., Bucsek, M., Szakolczai, J. and Molnár, K. (1982). Studies on the protozoan etiology of swim bladder inflammation in common carp fry. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 2, 2224.Google Scholar
Kovács-Gayer, E. (1983). Histopathological studies on protozoan swimbladder inflammation of common carp fry. Parasitologia Hungarica 16, 3946.Google Scholar
Körting, W. (1982). Protozoan parasites associated with swim-bladder inflammation (SBI) in young carp. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 2, 2528.Google Scholar
Körting, W. and Hermanns, W. (1984). Myxosporidien-Infektionen in der Niere des Karpfens (Cyprinus carpio L.) aus niedersächsischen Teichwirtschaften. Berliner und Münchner Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 97, 255259.Google Scholar
Körting, W., Kruse, P. and Steinhaben, D. (1989). Developmento of “Csaba cells” in experimentally infected Cyprinus carpio. Angewandte Parasitologie 30, 185188.Google Scholar
Lom, J. and Dyková, I. (1982). Sphaerospora renicola n. sp., a myxosporean from carp kidney, and its pathogenicity. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 68, 259268.Google Scholar
Lom, J., Pavlásková, M. and Dyková, I. (1985). Notes on kidney-infecting species on the genus Sphaerospora Thélohan (Myxosporea), including a new species S. gobionis sp. nov., and on myxosporean life cycle stage in the blood of some freshwater fish. Journal of Fish Diseases 8, 221232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lom, J. and Dyková, I. (2006). Myxozoan genera: definition and notes on taxonomy, life-cycle terminology and pathogenic species. Folia Parasitologica 53, 136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lom, J., Dyková, I. and Pavlásková, M. (1983). Unidentified mobile protozoans from the blood of carp and some unsolved problems of myxosporean life cycles. Journal of Protozoology 30, 497598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusková, V., Lusk, S., Halačka, K. and Vetešník, L. (2010). Carassius auratus gibelio—the most successful invasive fish in waters of the Czech Republic. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 1, 176180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsen, E., Waite, J. and Schall, J. (2007). Morphologically defined subgenera of Plasmodium from avian hosts: test of monophyly by phylogenetic analysis of two mitochondrial genes. Parasitology 134, 483490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, R. M. and Nowak, M. A. (1955). Coinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 261, 209215.Google Scholar
McGeorge, J., Sommerville, C. and Wootten, R. (1996). Epizootiology of Sphaerospora truttae (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) infections in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar at freshwater smolt producing hatcheries in Scotland. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 26, 3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, K. (1980 a). Renal sphaerosporosis in the common carp Cyprinus carpio L. Journal of Fish Diseases 3, 1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, K. (1980 b). “Sphaerosporosis”, a new kidney disease of the common carp. Fish diseases. Third COPRAQ Cooperative Programme of Research on Aquaculture Session, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany, 23–26 October 1979. Proceedings, pp. 157164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, K. (1994). Comments on the host, organ and tissue specificity of fish myxosporeans and on the types of their intrapiscine development. Parasitologia Hungarica 27, 520.Google Scholar
Molnár, K., El Mansy, A., Szekely, C. and Baska, F. (1999). Experimental identification of the actinosporean stage of Sphaerospora renicola Dykova & Lom 1982 (Myxosporea : Sphaerosporidae) in oligochaete alternate hosts. Journal of Fish Diseases 22, 143153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, K. and Kovács-Gayer, E. (1986). Experimental induction of Sphaerospora renicola (Myxosporea) infection in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio) by transmission of SB-protozoans. Zeitschrift fuer Angewandte Ichthyologie 2, 8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, K., Marton, S., Székely, C. and Eszterbauer, E. (2010). Differentiation of Myxobolus spp. (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae) infecting roach (Rutilus rutilus) in Hungary. Parasitology Research 107, 11371150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odening, K. (1987). Sphaerospora renicola (Myxosporidia), der Erreger der protozoären Schwimmblasentzündung des Jungkarpfens (renicola-Sphaerosporose). Merkblätter über angewandte Parasitenkunde und Schädlingsbekämpfung 30, 116.Google Scholar
Özer, A. and Wootten, R. (2000). The life cycle of Sphaerospora truttae (Myxozoa : Myxosporea) and some features of the biology of both the actinosporean and myxosporean stages. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 40, 3339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özer, A., Wootten, R. and Shinn, A. P. (2002). Infection prevalence, seasonality and host specificity of actinosporean types (Myxozoa) in an Atlantic salmon fish farm located in Northern Scotland. Folia Parasitologica 49, 263268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papoušek, I. (2008). Molecular-genetic analysis of the species of the genus Carassius in Central Europe. Ph. D. thesis, Masaryk University of Brno, Czech Republic. http://is.muni.cz/th/21842/prif_d/Disertace_Papousek_I_cast.pdfGoogle Scholar
Price, T., Lovette, I. J., Bermingham, E., Gibbs, H. L. and Richman, A. D. (2000). The imprint of history on communities of North American and Asian warblers. American Naturalist 156, 354367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, A. F. and Taylor, L. H. (2001). The ecology of genetically diverse infections. Science 292, 10991102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ronquist, F. and Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 15721574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedlaczek, J., Friede, H., Kluss, P. and Vinzelberg, R. (1990). Zum jahreszeitlichen Auftreten der Schwimmblasenentzündung im Verlauf der renicola-Sphaerosporose bei Karpfen. Angewandte Parasitologie 31, 219229.Google Scholar
Shulman, S. S. (1966). Myxosporidia of the USSR, 1st Edn. Nauka Publishers, Moskva-Leningrad, USSR.Google Scholar
Singh, B. and Simon Divis, P. C. (2009). Orangutans not infected with Plasmodium vivax or P. cynomolgi, Indonesia. Emerging Infectious Diseases 15, 16571658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sitja-Bobadilla, A. (2008). Fish immune response to myxozoan parasites. Parasite-Journal de la Societe Francaise de Parasitologie 15, 420425.Google ScholarPubMed
Sitja-Bobadilla, A. and Alvarez-Pellitero, P. (1994). Revised classification and key species of the genus Sphaerospora Davies, 1917 (Protozoa: Myxosporea). Research and Reviews in Parasitology 54, 6780.Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A. (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 26882690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swofford, D. L. (2001). PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Ter Höfte, B. B., Körting, W. and Lehmann, J. (1984). “C- und K-Protozoen”, Endoparasiten unsicherer systematischer Zuordnung beim jungen Karpfen (Cyprinus carpio L.). Derzeitiger Wissensstand und bildliche Dokumentation. Fisch und Umwelt 13, 8999.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. and Higgins, D. G. (1997). The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24, 48764882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valkiūnas, G., Santiago-Alarcon, D., Levin, I. I., Iezhova, T. A. and Parker, P. G. (2010). A new Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) from the endemic galapagos dove Zenaida galapagoensis, with remarks on the parasite distribution, vectors, and molecular diagnostics. Journal of Parasitology 96, 783792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Buskirk, J. (2002). A comparative test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: Relationships between habitat and phenotype in anuran larvae. American Naturalist 160, 87102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Auwera, G., Chapelle, S. and Dewachter, R. (1994). Structure of the large ribosomal subunit RNA of Phytophthora megasperma, and phylogeny of the oomycetes. FEBS Letters 338, 133136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, C. X. and Desser, S. S. (1998). The oligochaetes and their actinosporean parasites in Lake Sasajewun, Algonquin Park, Ontario. Journal of Parasitology 84, 10201026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yokoyama, H. (1997). Transmission of Thelohanellus hovorkai Achmerov, 1960 (Myxosporea: Myxozoa) to common carp Cyprinus carpio through the alternate oligochaete host. Systematic Parasitology 36, 7984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoyama, H., Ogawa, K. and Wakabayashi, H. (1995). Chemoresponse of actinosporean spores of Myxobolus cultus to skin mucus of goldfish Carassius auratus. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 21, 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Sphaerospora angulata and S. dykovae sample data: origin of fish, parasite prevalence and sequence data

Figure 1

Table 2. Primers and PCR conditions

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Spore morphology of S. angulata (A and B) and S. dykovae (C and D). (A and C) Maturing spores with bulges on posterior end of spore due to the location of the large valvular nuclei. (B and D) Fully mature spores with no visible (S. dykovae) or only small (S. angulata) valvular nuclei remnants. Small schematic drawings showing overall shape and relationship of size of polar capsules to size of spore for both spore developmental stages of both species; notice similarity of maturing spore stages.

Figure 3

Table 3. Description and morphometrical data of Sphaerospora angulata and S. dykovae myxospores

(Comparison of measurements obtained in the present study with published records (SL, spore length; SP, spore width; ST, spore thickness; PC, polar capsule; PCL, polar capsule length; PCW, polar capsule width; PF, polar filament.)
Figure 4

Fig. 2. Plot of the first two principal components of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of 5 measurements (spore length, spore width, spore thickness, polar capsule length, polar capsule width; ln-transformed) and 2 ratios (spore length:spore thickness, polar capsule length:spore length; arcsine square-root transformed) obtained from S. angulata (immature spores, black dots; mature spores, white dots) and S. dykovae (immature spores, black triangles; mature spores, white triangles).

Figure 5

Table 4. Molecular analysis of blood stages detected in C. c. carpio and C. a. auratus – species identification and prevalence

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 49 myxozoan SSU rDNA sequences; GenBank Accession numbers in parenthesis; taxa with new sequences are in bold and myxozoans identified in the blood are marked with an arrow. Note that S. dykovae and S. angulata as well as the unidentified myxozoan detected in the blood cluster within the Sphaerospora s. str. clade. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood bootstrap values (BS) and Bayesian inference posterior probabilities (BPP) are shown at nodes. Nodes with BS⋝95 and BPP⋝0·98 have bold branches. Weakly supported nodes (BS < 50, BPP < 0·70) are represented with dashes or blanks. Malacosporeans (Mal.) were used as outgroup. Scale bar = 0·1 substitution per site.