Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T13:18:55.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultrastructural characterization of in vivo-produced ovine morulae and blastocysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2014

E.M.V. Bettencourt*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Évora, 7000-092 Évora, Portugal. Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Évora, 7000-092 Évora, Portugal. ICAAM – Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrâneas. Universidade de Évora, Núcleo da Mitra, Ap. 94 7002–554 Évora, Portugal.
C.M.V. Bettencourt
Affiliation:
Regional Agriculture Direction of Alentejo (DRAAL), Herdade da Abóbada, V.N.S. Bento, Portugal.
J.N. Chagas e Silva
Affiliation:
Veterinary Medicine Faculty, Reproduction Department, Lisbon University (UL), Lisbon, Portugal.
P. Ferreira
Affiliation:
ICBAS, CECA/ICETA, University of Porto, da UP, Portugal.
E. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Department of Microscopy, Laboratory of Cell Biology, UMIB, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Portugal.
R. Romão
Affiliation:
ICAAM – Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrâneas. Universidade de Évora, Núcleo da Mitra, Ap. 94 7002–554 Évora, Portugal. Department of Zootechny, University of Évora, 7000-092 Évora, Portugal.
A. Rocha
Affiliation:
ICBAS, CECA/ICETA, University of Porto, da UP, Portugal.
M. Sousa
Affiliation:
Department of Microscopy, Laboratory of Cell Biology, UMIB, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Portugal.
*
All correspondence to: Elisa Maria Varela Bettencourt. Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Évora, 7000-092 Évora, Portugal. Tel: +35 1266760809. Fax: +35 1266760944. e-mail: emvb@uevora.pt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The ultrastructure of in vivo-produced ovine embryos, at the morula, early blastocyst and late blastocyst stages, was evaluated using transmission electron microscopy. Embryonic cells were characterized by the presence of intact intercellular junctions, numerous mitochondria, smooth endoplasmic reticulum cisternae and light vesicles. Polyribosomes, rough endoplasmic reticulum cisternae, secondary lysosomes, Golgi complexes and lipid droplets were also observed in the cytoplasm. The nucleus was well defined and organized, with an intact envelope rich in nuclear pore complexes, and one or more reticular nucleoli. Microvilli were present in external blastomeres of morulae and became more abundant in trophectoderm cells of early and late blastocysts. Light vesicles seemed to be associated with small cisternae of Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum origin. These cisternae fused and created light vesicles with engulfed heterogeneous cytosolic structures, small cisternae and vesicles. Their labile membrane enabled them to rapidly coalesce into medium-sized vesicles that began to engulf mitochondria and lipid droplets, forming giant vacuoles mostly filled with fat. Incomplete matured secretory vesicles were observed to exocytose into the perivitelline space of morulae, whereas fully matured secretory vesicles appeared only in trophectoderm cells, being exocytosed into the blastocoelic cavity. These observations suggested that these endoplasmic-/Golgi-derived vesicles behave as active autophagic organelles presenting probably a maturation process from compact morulae to blastocyst.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Introduction

Several invasive and non-invasive methods for embryo evaluation have been reported (Van Soom et al., Reference Van Soom, Vanroose and de Kruif2001; Abe et al., Reference Abe, Matsuzaki and Hoshi2002). Despite the fact that more accurate data can be acquired from invasive techniques, embryo quality must be estimated by non-invasive methods if the selected embryo has to be transferred (Van Soom et al., Reference Van Soom, Vanroose and de Kruif2001). Embryo morphology evaluation using stereomicroscopy is the method used most widely to evaluate embryo quality, but it remains one of the most subjective and qualitative aspects of all the multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) processes (Abe et al., Reference Abe, Matsuzaki and Hoshi2002). The application of the morphological classification, developed for bovine embryos (Linder & Wright, Reference Linder and Wright1983), to other species may result in some misclassifications. The shortcomings of the morphological evaluation are even more serious after cryopreservation, as ultrastructural studies carried out with cryopreserved embryos (Cocero et al., Reference Cocero, Díaz de la Espina and Aguilar2002; Bettencourt et al., Reference Bettencourt, Bettencourt, Silva, Ferreira, Matos, Oliveira, Romão, Rocha and Sousa2009) have revealed that certain abnormalities and alterations cannot be detected using stereomicroscopy alone.

Mammalian embryos are routinely cultured until the morula or blastocyst stages before being either cryopreserved or transferred to recipients and therefore the accurate evaluation of embryo quality at these developmental stages is crucial for both the researcher and the clinician (Van Soom et al., Reference Van Soom, Vanroose and de Kruif2001; Abe et al., Reference Abe, Matsuzaki and Hoshi2002). In order to correctly interpret the level of cellular damage after cryopreservation a precise knowledge of the ultrastructural characteristics of fresh embryos is needed. There are several studies that describe the ultrastructure of fresh and cryopreserved embryos of various species (Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995; Vajta et al., Reference Vajta, Hyttel and Callesen1997; Fair et al., Reference Fair, Lonergan, Dinnyes, Cottell, Hyttel, Ward and Boland2001; Rizos et al., Reference Rizos, Fair, Papadopoulos, Boland and Lonergan2002; Cuello et al., Reference Cuello, Berthelot, Delaleu, Venturi, Pastor, Vazquez, Roca, Martinat-Botté and Martinez2007) but detailed data on the ultrastructural characterization of ovine in vivo-produced embryos are scarce (Calarco & McLaren Reference Calarco and McLaren1976; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995; Rizos et al., Reference Rizos, Fair, Papadopoulos, Boland and Lonergan2002). In the present ultrastructural study we describe the ultrastructure of in vivo-produced morula and blastocyst embryos, with a focus on the association of light vesicles with other cellular organelles.

Materials and methods

Embryo production

In vivo-produced embryos (n = 14) were obtained from Portuguese Black Merino ewes, superovulated during the spring. Donors were synchronized with intravaginal sponges that contained 40 mg flurogestone acetate (Chronogest®, Intervet Laboratories, Boxmeer, The Netherlands) for 12 days. Starting on day 9 of sponge treatment and for 4 consecutive days, ewes were treated (intramuscular) with 1.25 ml ovine follicle stimulating hormone (oFSH; Ovagen®, Immunological Products Ldt. Aukland, New Zealand), twice a day (at 9:00 and 21:00 h). Sponges were removed at the time of the seventh FSH administration. Laparoscopic intrauterine insemination was performed with fresh diluted semen in all ewes, 48 h after sponge removal, as previously described (McKelvey et al., Reference McKelvey, Robinson, Aitken and Henderson1985). A minimum of 50 × 106 motile spermatozoa was placed in each uterine horn. Additionally, ewes were hand mated at 36 and 48 h after sponge withdrawal and left with rams for 4–6 h at a ewe:ram ratio of 3:1. Embryos were recovered by abdominal laparotomy, under general anesthesia, on days 6 or 7 after sponge removal. Each uterine horn was flushed using a Foley catheter as described in detail elsewhere (Smith & Murphy, Reference Smith and Murphy1987). The collection medium (40 ml for each uterine horn) was phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution that contained 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA).

Morphological scoring of embryos was performed based on morphological criteria and developmental stage in accordance with the guidelines of the International Embryo Transfer Society (Stringfellow & Seidel, Reference Stringfellow and Seidel1998). Embryos were scored as grade 1 (excellent or good) when presenting a symmetrical and spherical cell mass with ≥75% of intact cells (<25% of degenerated cells/cell fragments), with individual cells showing a uniform size, colour and density and as grade 2 embryos (fair) when showing a cell mass with ≥50% of intact cells (25–50% of degenerated cells/cell fragments), with individual cells presenting moderate irregularities in size, colour and density. Fresh embryos, at the compact morula (n = 4) early blastocyst (n = 6) and blastocyst (n = 4) stages, classified as grade 1 and 2, were processed for transmission electron microscopy.

Electron microscopy

Fourteen embryos were fixed, within 1 h of collection, in Karnowsky's fixative (2 h, 4°C), washed with 0.15 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3 (overnight, 4°C), post-fixed (1 h, 4°C) in 1% OsO4 in buffer that contained 0.8% hexanocyanoferrate potassium [K3Fe3+(CN)6], and washed for 15 min in buffer. They were then dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol (50, 70, 90, 2 ×100%; 30 min each), at room temperature followed by propylene oxide (15 min), impregnated with propylene oxide:epon (3:1, 1 h; 1:1, overnight, 4°C; 1:3, 4 h) and embedded in Epon (7 h at room temperature, 3 days at 60°C). Sections were cut with a Leica ultramicrotome with a Diatome knife. Semi-thin sections (0.5 μm) were stained with aqueous azur II:methylene blue (1:1). Ultrathin sections (700 Å) were collected onto 200 mesh copper grids (Taab) and stained with 3% aqueous uranyl acetate (20 min) and Reynolds lead citrate (10 min). Sections were observed in a transmission electron microscope JEOL 100CXII operated at 60 kV.

Except when otherwise indicated, all chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemicals Company (Barcelona, Spain).

Results

Semi-thin sections showed that at the compact morula stage, there were almost no intercellular spaces, being difficult to distinguish the individual cells, whereas the perivitelline space was enlarged due to cell compaction (Fig. 1A). Early blastocysts were characterized by the appearance of small cavities below peripheral cells (Fig. 1B), which grew progressively as the embryos developed to the late blastocyst stage (Fig. 1C). Two cell types were already distinguishable at the early blastocyst stage: (1) those on the periphery that will give rise to trophectoderm; and (2) those located centrally that will give rise to the inner cell mass (Fig. 1B). The blastocoelic cavity accounted for more than half of the embryo size at the blastocyst stage and the cells of the inner cell mass were grouped together and surrounded by trophectoderm cells. At this stage the perivitelline space was no longer visible and trophectoderm tightly cells lined the inner zona pellucida (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1 Fresh in vivo ovine embryos fixed 1 h after collection. Semi-thin sections of compact morulae (A), early blastocyst (B), and blastocyst (C). Zona pellucida (ZP), inner cells (I), outer cells (O); trophectoderm (TF); inner cell mass (ICM); blastocoelic cavity (*).

At the ultrastructural level there were several characteristics that were common to all studied stages of development (Fig. 2). The main differences found between outer and inner cells of morulae (Fig. 2A, B), or between trophectoderm (Fig. 2C, E) and inner cell mass cells (Fig. 2D, F) of blastocysts were their shape, the presence of external microvilli and very large secretory vesicles in outer cells of morulae (Fig. 2A) and trophectoderm cells of late blastocysts (Fig. 2C, E) and an increase in the number of perinuclear Golgi complexes in early blastocysts.

Figure 2 Ultrastructure of fresh in vivo ovine embryos at compact morulae (A, B), early blastocyst (C, D) and blastocyst (E, F) stages. Outer (A, C) and inner cells (B, D), trophectoderm (E) and inner cell mass (F) cells. Zona pellucida (ZP), microvilli (Mv), blastocoelic cavity (bc), exocytosis (thick white arrows), intercellular junctions (black arrows), mitochondria (m), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (white arrowheads), light vesicles (v), lipid droplets (L), Golgi complexes (G), secondary lysosomes (LY), cortical vesicles (cv), nucleus (N), nucleolus (Nc), nucleolar fibrillar centers (FC), nucleolar dense fibrillar component (DFC), nucleolar granular component (GC), receptor-mediated endocytosis (black arrowheads).

Microvilli were sparse and shorter in compact morulae (Fig. 2A), then becoming longer and more abundant in early (Fig. 2C) and late blastocyst (Fig. 2E) stages. At the later stage, due to the absent perivitelline space, a dense continuous cover of bended microvilli lay between trophectoderm and the zona pellucida (Fig. 2E).

Polyribosomes, rough endoplasmic reticulum, secondary lysosomes, perinuclear Golgi complexes and lipid droplets were also observed (Fig. 2). Mitochondria, presenting peripheral and transverse cristae, were frequently surrounded by cisternae of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 2).

The nucleus was well defined and organized, with an intact envelope rich in nuclear pore complexes and one or more reticulated nucleolus with evident fibrillar centres surrounded by the dense fibrillar and granular components (Fig. 2).

Outer and inner embryonic cells were characterized by the presence of intact intercellular junctions, numerous mitochondria, smooth endoplasmic reticulum and light vesicles (Fig. 2). Embryonic cells of morulae and inner cell mass showed adherent and gap junctions without prominent associated filament bundles. Inner cell mass cells also presented long cytoplasmic extensions that overlapped and interdigitated with neighbouring cells forming additional intercellular links (Fig. 3A); while trophectoderm cells of blastocysts showed prominent junctional complexes (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3 Ultrastructure of fresh in vivo-produced ovine early blastocysts. (A) Inner cell mass cells. (B) Trophectoderm cells. Blastocoelic cavity (bc), zona pellucida (ZP), perivitelline space (pvS), microvilli (Mv), mitochondria (m), light vesicles (v), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (white arrowheads), rough endoplasmic reticulum (black arrowheads), cortical vesicles (cv), intercellular junctions (black arrows), filament bundles (*), nucleus (N).

Small dense cortical vesicles were observed in inner and outer cells of early blastocysts (Figs. 2C and 3B) whereas receptor-mediated endocytosis was observed only in inner cells of early blastocysts (Fig. 2D).

Abundant light vesicles were observed in the vicinity of the perinuclear region, at the trans-Golgi network, as well as at the cortical region of peripheral cells in morula stage (Fig. 4). Golgi-derived small cisternae were observed to bend and fuse at their extremities, trapping inside cytosolic structures, small cisternae and vesicles. At the cell periphery, small smooth endoplasmic reticulum cisternae began to encircle light cytosolic areas (Fig. 4B), and then also fused to form light vesicles. Protrusion and coalescence between vesicles was also seen. Expansions of the outer nuclear membrane were also observed to be closely associated with the membrane of the vesicles (Fig. 5A). These vesicles incorporated other organelles through protrusion and engulfment of other light vesicles, mitochondria and lipid droplets (Figs. 5B and 6A, B). Large light vesicles were observed to open into the perivitelline space of morulae (Fig. 2A), whereas very large and dense vesicles were restricted to trophectoderm cells of late blastocysts (Fig. 7). Some of these large vesicles exhibited signs of swelling, with a decrease in the total area occupied by dense lipid droplets and by appearance of an amorphous substance and numerous membrane profiles that remained attached to the surface of lipids. The exocytosis of the three components into the blastocoelic cavity was seen (Fig. 7C).

Figure 4 Origin of light vesicles at the perinuclear region (A) and cortical region of peripheral cells (B) in ovine morula. Golgi complexes (G), Golgi cisternae (thick black arrow), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (ER), vesicles (v), mitochondria (m), labile membranes (white arrowheads), membrane fusion (black arrowheads), perivitelline space (pvS), microvilli (Mv), nucleus (N), cortical vesicles (cv), tight junction (black arrow), lipid droplet (L).

Figure 5 (A) cortical region of peripheral cells. (B) Cell periphery of peripheral cells. Vesicle protusion and coalescence in ovine early blastocysts Semi-thin section (inset left down), incorporation of organelles by light vesicles (inset left up). Nucleus (N), nuclear pore complexes (thick white arrow; inset right), light vesicles (v), expansions of the outer nuclear membrane (white arrowhead, inset right), mitochondria (m).

Figure 6 Different steps of the maturation process of the light vesicles in ovine blastocysts. Light vesicles (v), mitochondria (m), mitochondrial membranes (black arrowheads), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (white arrowheads), lipid droplets (L), myeline like droplets (thick black arrow), large vacuole (thick white arrow), lipid engulfment (arrows), blastocoelic cavity (bc).

Figure 7 Trophectoderm cells of late blastocysts (AC). Vesicles (v), lipid droplets (L), amorphous substance (*), membrane profiles (white arrowheads), exocytosis (arrows), zona pellucida (ZP), microvilli (Mv), blastocoelic cavity (bc), mitochondria (m), nucleus (N).

Discussion

Ovine in vivo-produced embryos are usually collected at the morula or blastocyst stage (Cognié et al. Reference Cognié, Baril, Poulin and Mermillod2003). The ultrastructural characterization of the cell organization at these stages of development provides essential information, which enables the establishment of objective criteria for embryo evaluation. This is particularly useful in order to understand cell damage observed after cryopreservation and allows the correct characterization of the different lesions induced along the process (Dobrinsky, Reference Dobrinsky1996; Cocero et al., Reference Cocero, Díaz de la Espina and Aguilar2002; Smith & Silva, Reference Smith and Silva2004; Bettencourt et al., Reference Bettencourt, Bettencourt, Silva, Ferreira, Matos, Oliveira, Romão, Rocha and Sousa2009). Some ultrastructural characteristics of ovine in vivo-produced embryos have been previously described (Calarco & McLaren, Reference Calarco and McLaren1976; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995; Cocero et al., Reference Cocero, Díaz de la Espina and Aguilar2002; Rizos et al., Reference Rizos, Fair, Papadopoulos, Boland and Lonergan2002; Bettencourt et al., Reference Bettencourt, Bettencourt, Silva, Ferreira, Matos, Oliveira, Romão, Rocha and Sousa2009). This study provides additional information on cellular structures that can be used to better characterize embryos at this stage of development.

All embryos evaluated in this study were at the compact morula, early blastocyst or late blastocyst stage, based on chronological development of ovine embryos (Winterberger-Torres & Sevellec, Reference Winterberger-Torres and Sevellec1987). In ovine embryos, compaction has been described to occur between days 5 and 6 (day 0: estrous) and, as embryos progress from the morula to the blastocyst stage (between days 6 and 7), it was noticed that the relative volume of the intercellular space decreased as the blastocoele became more organized and occupied an increased proportion of the embryo (Calarco & McLaren, Reference Calarco and McLaren1976; Winterberger-Torres & Sevellec, Reference Winterberger-Torres and Sevellec1987; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995).

The general ultrastructural characteristics here described are in agreement with previous findings (Calarco & McLaren, Reference Calarco and McLaren1976; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995; Cocero et al., Reference Cocero, Díaz de la Espina and Aguilar2002; Rizos et al., Reference Rizos, Fair, Papadopoulos, Boland and Lonergan2002).

The well defined nucleus with two or more reticulated nucleoli observed here at the morula and blastocyst stages, has been associated with the high protein synthesis described for these stages of development (Hyttel et al., Reference Hyttel, Viuff, Fair, Laurincik, Thomsen, Callesen, Vos, Hendriksen, Dieleman and Schellander2001), and that is needed for both housekeeping functions and cell specialization of the developing preimplantation embryo (Hyttel et al., Reference Hyttel, Laurincik, Viuff, Fair, Zakhartchenko, Rosenkranz, Avery, Rath, Niemann and Thomsen2000, Reference Hyttel, Viuff, Fair, Laurincik, Thomsen, Callesen, Vos, Hendriksen, Dieleman and Schellander2001). At earlier stages, only a dense and spherical nucleolar precursor was observed at the eight-cell stage (Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995).

Abundant mitochondria, surrounded by smooth endoplasmic reticulum cisternae, as reported here, have also been described in both in in vivo-produced (Calarco & McLaren, Reference Calarco and McLaren1976; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995; Cocero et al., Reference Cocero, Díaz de la Espina and Aguilar2002) and in in vitro-produced ovine embryos (Rizos et al., Reference Rizos, Fair, Papadopoulos, Boland and Lonergan2002). It has been suggested that the mitochondrial structure is altered throughout bovine and ovine preimplantation embryo development, with mitochondria in morulae presenting an increased amount of transverse cristae compared with those found at earlier stages (Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995; Crosier et al., Reference Crosier, Farin, Dykstra, Alexander and Farin2000, Reference Crosier, Farin, Dykstra, Alexander and Farin2001). Mitochondrial function may be used as a predictor of the developmental potential of embryos after cryopreservation, as lipid accumulation depends on the metabolism of mitochondria (Dorland et al. Reference Dorland, Gardner and Trounson1994; Crosier et al., Reference Crosier, Farin, Dykstra, Alexander and Farin2000, Reference Crosier, Farin, Dykstra, Alexander and Farin2001; Abe et al., Reference Abe, Matsuzaki and Hoshi2002) and resistance to cryopreservation depends on lipid contents (Dobrinsky Reference Dobrinsky1996; Smith & Silva, Reference Smith and Silva2004). Thus evaluation of the degree of ultrastructural damage of mitochondria in frozen–thawed embryos may be a useful indicator of embryo developmental capabilities.

Microvilli were more abundant in blastocysts compared with morulae, confirming previous observations (Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995). Junctional complexes only connected to neighbouring peripheral and trophectoderm cells of blastocysts, anchoring them in place. These intercellular junctions and the associated system of intracellular filaments are known to contribute to the retention of the blastocoelic fluid (Van Soom et al., Reference Van Soom, Vanroose and de Kruif2001), allowing trophectoderm cells to work as an epithelial barrier (Boni et al., Reference Boni, Tosti, Roviello and Dale1999) and have also been previously described in in vitro- and in vivo-produced ovine embryos (Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995; Cocero et al., Reference Cocero, Díaz de la Espina and Aguilar2002; Rizos et al., Reference Rizos, Fair, Papadopoulos, Boland and Lonergan2002). We show here that inner cell mass cells also develop long cytoplasmic extensions that overlap and interdigitate with neighbouring cells, further contributing to intercellular communication that is essential for the coordination of the ensuing process and leading to the early embryogenic process (Boni et al., Reference Boni, Tosti, Roviello and Dale1999). Damage to this cytoplasmic extension network during the freezing/thawing cycles may compromise further embryo development.

The most noticeable aspect of the cytoplasm of ovine embryos was the presence of abundant cytoplasmic small light vesicles with heterogeneous contents. These vesicular structures have been previously described both in in vivo- and in in vitro-produced bovine, swine and ovine embryos (Calarco & McLaren, Reference Calarco and McLaren1976; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995; Abe et al., Reference Abe, Matsuzaki and Hoshi2002; Cocero et al., Reference Cocero, Díaz de la Espina and Aguilar2002; Fabian et al., Reference Fabian, Gjorret, Berthelot, Martinat-Botté and Maddox-Hyttel2005). The origin and specific role of these vesicles remain uncertain (Calarco & McLaren, Reference Calarco and McLaren1976; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995).

Due to the close association between structures it could be speculated that light vesicles originate from small cisternae of Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum. Vesicles with heterogeneous contents, including cytosolic structures, small cisternae and vesicles were also seen. It will be interested to verify if they originated from fusion of smaller light vesicles. Even larger vesicles were made through protrusion and engulfment of other light vesicles and lipid droplets, therein forming giant vacuoles mostly filled with fat. Lipid-poor medium-sized vesicles were observed to exocytose into the perivitelline space of compact morulae, while lipid-rich, very large vesicles were restricted to trophectoderm cells and observed to exocytose into the blastocoelic cavity. Light vesicles have been previously found to decrease in number from morulae to blastocyst stages (Calarco & McLaren, Reference Calarco and McLaren1976; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995), while increasing in size (Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995), and have been suggested to behave as lysosome-like organelles that somehow could contribute to the formation of the blastocoelic cavity (Linares & Plõen, Reference Linares and Plõen1981; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, García, Villar and Arias1995; Abe et al., Reference Abe, Otoi, Tachikawa, Yamashita, Satoh and Hoshi1999). A similar origin and maturation process of endoplasmic reticulum- and Golgi-derived vesicles was previously described in crustacean oogenesis, during which they were the origin of yolk vesicles, energy-storage organelles that are essential for embryo development, and cortical vesicles, which also secrete materials of the hyaline layer that covers and protects external surfaces of embryonic cells (Carvalho et al., Reference Carvalho, Sousa, Oliveira, Carvalheiro and Baldaia1998a, Reference Carvalho, Sousa, Oliveira, Carvalheiro and Baldaia1998b, Reference Carvalho, Sousa, Oliveira, Carvalheiro and Baldaia1999).

Thus, it seems plausible that the described vesicular structures may play a role in the formation of the blastocoelic cavity, morula compaction and trophectoderm development.

In conclusion, the findings of this study have added detailed information on the cellular components of in vivo-produced ovine embryos, some of which were described here for the first time. Taken together, the information provided can be used as a basis to assess structural differences between fresh in vivo- and in vitro-produced embryos, as well as to contribute to better evaluation of the damage produced by the freezing and thawing processes.

Financial

This work was funded by Portuguese AGRO projects (AGRO 438 Portuguese Animal Germplasm Bank), and by FEDER Fundus (European Regional Development Fund), through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors (COMPETE) and National Funds through FCT (Foundation for the Science and Technology) under the Strategic Project PEst-C/AGR/UI0115/2011.

References

Abe, H., Otoi, T., Tachikawa, S., Yamashita, S., Satoh, T. & Hoshi, H. (1999). Fine structure of bovine morulae and blastocyst in vivo and in vitro. Anat. Embryol. 199, 519–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abe, H., Matsuzaki, S. & Hoshi, H. (2002). Ultrastructural differences in bovine morulae classified as high and low qualities by morphological evaluation. Theriogenology 57, 1273–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bettencourt, E.M.V., Bettencourt, C.M., Silva, J.N.C., Ferreira, P., Matos, C.P., Oliveira, E., Romão, R.J., Rocha, A. & Sousa, M. (2009). Ultrastructural characterization of fresh and cryopreserved in vivo produced ovine embryos. Theriogenology 71, 947–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boni, R., Tosti, E., Roviello, S. & Dale, B. (1999). Intracellular communication in in vivo and in vitro produced bovine embryos. Biol. Reprod. 61, 1050–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calarco, P.G. & McLaren, A. (1976). Ultrastructural observations of preimplantation stages of the sheep. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 36, 609–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, F., Sousa, M., Oliveira, E., Carvalheiro, J. & Baldaia, L. (1998a). Ultrastructure of oogenesis in Penaeus kerathurus (Crustacea, Decapoda). I Previtellogenic oocytes. J. Sumicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 30, 408–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, F., Sousa, M., Oliveira, E., Carvalheiro, L.& Baldaia, L. (1998b). Ultrastructure of oogenesis in Penaeus kerathurus (Crustacea, Decapoda). II Vitellogenesis. J. Sumicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 30, 527–35.Google Scholar
Carvalho, F., Sousa, M., Oliveira, E., Carvalheiro, J. & Baldaia, L. (1999). Ultrastructure of oogenesis in Penaeus kerathurus (Crustacea, Decapoda). III Cortical vesicle formation. J. Sumicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 31, 5763.Google Scholar
Cocero, M.J., Díaz de la Espina, S.M. & Aguilar, B. (2002). Ultrastructural characteristics of fresh and frozen-thawed ovine embryos using two cryoprotectants. Biol. Reprod. 66, 1244–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cognié, Y., Baril, G., Poulin, N. & Mermillod, P. (2003). Current status of embryo technologies in sheep and goats. Theriogenology 59, 171–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosier, A.E., Farin, P.W., Dykstra, M.J., Alexander, J.E. & Farin, C.E. (2000). Ultrastructural morphometry of bovine compact morulae produced in vivo or in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1459–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crosier, A.E., Farin, P.W., Dykstra, M.J., Alexander, J.E. & Farin, C.E. (2001). Ultrastructural morphometry of bovine blastocysts produced in vivo or in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 64, 1375–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuello, C., Berthelot, F., Delaleu, B., Venturi, E., Pastor, L.M., Vazquez, J.M., Roca, J., Martinat-Botté, F. & Martinez, E.A. (2007). The effectiveness of the stereomicroscopic evaluation of embryo quality in vitrified-warmed porcine blastocysts: An ultrastructural and cell death study. Theriogenology 67, 970–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobrinsky, J.R. (1996). Cellular approach to cryopreservation of embryos. Theriogenology 45, 1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorland, M., Gardner, D.K. & Trounson, A.O. (1994). Serum in synthetic oviduct fluid causes mitochondrial degeneration in ovine embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. Abstr. Ser. 13, 25.Google Scholar
Fabian, D., Gjorret, J.O., Berthelot, F., Martinat-Botté, F. & Maddox-Hyttel, P. (2005). Ultrastructure and cell death of in vivo derived and vitrified porcine blastocysts. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 70, 155–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fair, T., Lonergan, P., Dinnyes, A., Cottell, D.C., Hyttel, P., Ward, F.A. & Boland, M.P. (2001). Ultrastructure of bovine blastocysts following cryopreservation: effect of method of blastocyst production. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 58, 186–95.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrer, F., García, C., Villar, J. & Arias, M. (1995). Ultrastructural study of the early development of the sheep embryo. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 24, 191–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyttel, P., Laurincik, J., Viuff, D., Fair, T., Zakhartchenko, V., Rosenkranz, C., Avery, B., Rath, D., Niemann, H. & Thomsen, P.D.et al. (2000). Activation of ribosomal RNA genes in preimplantation cattle and swine embryos. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60–61, 4960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyttel, P., Viuff, D., Fair, T., Laurincik, J., Thomsen, P.D., Callesen, H., Vos, P.L., Hendriksen, P.J., Dieleman, S.J. & Schellander, K.et al. (2001). Ribosomal RNA gene expression and chromosome aberrations in bovine oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Reproduction 122, 2130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linares, T. & Plõen, L. (1981). On the ultrastructure of seven day old normal (blastocysts) and abnormal bovine embryos. Anat. Embryol. 10, 212–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linder, G.M. & Wright, R.W. (1983). Bovine embryo morphology and evaluation. Theriogenology 20, 407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, A.C., Robinson, J.J., Aitken, R.P. & Henderson, G. (1985). The evaluation of a laparoscopic insemination technique in ewes. Theriogenology 24, 519–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizos, D., Fair, T., Papadopoulos, S., Boland, M.P. & Lonergan, P. (2002). Developmental, qualitative and ultrastructural differences between ovine and bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 62, 320–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C.L. & Murphy, C.A. (1987). An antegrade surgical uterine flush technique for ova collection in the ewe. Am. J. Vet. Res. 48, 1129–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, G.D. & Silva, C.A.S.E. (2004). Developmental consequences of cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes and embryos. Reprod. BioMed. Online 9, 171–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stringfellow, D.A. & Seidel, S.M. (eds) (1998). Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society. Savoy, IL, USA: International Embryo Transfer Society, Inc.Google Scholar
Vajta, G., Hyttel, P. & Callesen, H. (1997). Morphological changes of in vitro produced bovine blastocysts after vitrification, in-straw direct rehydration and culture. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 48, 917.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soom, A., Vanroose, G. & de Kruif, A. (2001). Blastocyst evaluation by means of differential staining: a practical approach. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 36, 2935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winterberger-Torres, S. & Sevellec, C. (1987). Atlas of the Early Development of the Sheep Embryo. INRA (Institute National de la Reserche Agronomique) Publ. Versailles.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Fresh in vivo ovine embryos fixed 1 h after collection. Semi-thin sections of compact morulae (A), early blastocyst (B), and blastocyst (C). Zona pellucida (ZP), inner cells (I), outer cells (O); trophectoderm (TF); inner cell mass (ICM); blastocoelic cavity (*).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Ultrastructure of fresh in vivo ovine embryos at compact morulae (A, B), early blastocyst (C, D) and blastocyst (E, F) stages. Outer (A, C) and inner cells (B, D), trophectoderm (E) and inner cell mass (F) cells. Zona pellucida (ZP), microvilli (Mv), blastocoelic cavity (bc), exocytosis (thick white arrows), intercellular junctions (black arrows), mitochondria (m), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (white arrowheads), light vesicles (v), lipid droplets (L), Golgi complexes (G), secondary lysosomes (LY), cortical vesicles (cv), nucleus (N), nucleolus (Nc), nucleolar fibrillar centers (FC), nucleolar dense fibrillar component (DFC), nucleolar granular component (GC), receptor-mediated endocytosis (black arrowheads).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Ultrastructure of fresh in vivo-produced ovine early blastocysts. (A) Inner cell mass cells. (B) Trophectoderm cells. Blastocoelic cavity (bc), zona pellucida (ZP), perivitelline space (pvS), microvilli (Mv), mitochondria (m), light vesicles (v), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (white arrowheads), rough endoplasmic reticulum (black arrowheads), cortical vesicles (cv), intercellular junctions (black arrows), filament bundles (*), nucleus (N).

Figure 3

Figure 4 Origin of light vesicles at the perinuclear region (A) and cortical region of peripheral cells (B) in ovine morula. Golgi complexes (G), Golgi cisternae (thick black arrow), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (ER), vesicles (v), mitochondria (m), labile membranes (white arrowheads), membrane fusion (black arrowheads), perivitelline space (pvS), microvilli (Mv), nucleus (N), cortical vesicles (cv), tight junction (black arrow), lipid droplet (L).

Figure 4

Figure 5 (A) cortical region of peripheral cells. (B) Cell periphery of peripheral cells. Vesicle protusion and coalescence in ovine early blastocysts Semi-thin section (inset left down), incorporation of organelles by light vesicles (inset left up). Nucleus (N), nuclear pore complexes (thick white arrow; inset right), light vesicles (v), expansions of the outer nuclear membrane (white arrowhead, inset right), mitochondria (m).

Figure 5

Figure 6 Different steps of the maturation process of the light vesicles in ovine blastocysts. Light vesicles (v), mitochondria (m), mitochondrial membranes (black arrowheads), smooth endoplasmic reticulum (white arrowheads), lipid droplets (L), myeline like droplets (thick black arrow), large vacuole (thick white arrow), lipid engulfment (arrows), blastocoelic cavity (bc).

Figure 6

Figure 7 Trophectoderm cells of late blastocysts (AC). Vesicles (v), lipid droplets (L), amorphous substance (*), membrane profiles (white arrowheads), exocytosis (arrows), zona pellucida (ZP), microvilli (Mv), blastocoelic cavity (bc), mitochondria (m), nucleus (N).