In late September 1605, George Benson, a London lime-man dwelling at Broken Wharf, realized he had been robbed of forty shillings. Fortunately, help was close by. He had only to walk up Thames Street to speak with Edward Gresham. The surviving note of Gresham's advice is frank and authoritative. The culprit was described as ‘some comon harlott with whom he had to do. She is of low & small stature fatt bodyed round face fleagmatick complexion but comly brown coullor.’ The record is equally terse and ambiguous. Gresham's description relied on ‘Judgement of this figure’, a horoscope situating the crime in time and space, but also scrutiny of the figure, the luckless labourer, seated before him.Footnote 1 Gresham considered the wrong perpetrated by an individual naturally inimical to Benson; one inclined not simply to transgress but to do so in certain ways, and at particular moments, because her person and personality, or life, intersected with that of the victim, predisposing her to the crime. In the previous six months, Gresham had performed hundreds of acts of astrological triangulation.Footnote 2 To his rooms, adjacent Dyers Hall, came a knight, gentlemen, Cheapside goldsmiths and drapers, the wives of a JP and Custom House officials, merchants from the Exchange, innholders, butchers, tailors, cobblers, weavers, sailors, and a dyer too. While some had questions about their health or relationships, most wanted Gresham to act as a kind of consulting constable, supplying profiles of the otherwise unknown parties to theft, and, occasionally, personal affray.
It was as if celestial rays had spattered crime scenes, creating telltale silhouettes, or the culprits had left behind some sort of cosmic trace evidence used to deduce the type of person responsible. So, two generations later, the empiric William Salmon considered a person born with the Sun in the ascendant would find, at certain times, that their planet's relative position meant ‘many sorrows afflict … the Native, troubles and contentions from Saturnian men and things’.Footnote 3 And another generation after that advice, George Parker's 1718 almanac cautioned readers to be wary of those born under the ‘Malifick Ray’ of Mars and Mercury because they would be backbiters, liars, fraudsters and robbers. As proof, Parker offered the horoscope of Susanna Saker, evidently apprehended with astrological assistance and recently executed for coining.Footnote 4
There is an extensive historiography on the idea that the heavens condition earthly affairs. Keith Thomas's magisterial Religion and the decline of magic charted Tudor–Stuart astrology and inspired a generation of historians. We have studies of prominent practitioners: John Dee, the Elizabethan polymath; Simon Forman, the Jacobethan physician; William Lilly, the Civil War polemicist.Footnote 5 The importance of astrology to popular culture, in everything from drama and cheap print to consumer goods, is well established.Footnote 6 So too a narrative: a mid-seventeenth-century cynosure followed by eclipse as the waxing of modern rational thought, along with a restored monarchy, left superstitious and allegedly regicidal enthusiasms the property of credulous plebs.Footnote 7 There is also a substantial literature on early modern crime and policing of social order, including the identification of criminals courtesy of newspaper advertisements.Footnote 8 But how did people act before the advent of these printed mercuries, or what arguably became tools of an enlightened discrimination?Footnote 9 Tracking those responsible for burglary, assault, fraud, or homicide was no easy task. Hue-and-cry warrants were costly and not especially fleet. Impediments to detection ranged from the feebleness of artificial lighting through to dead men telling no tales.Footnote 10 Vexed owners or employers, injured victims, and grieving families turned to astrology. Astrology became profiling early modern style: consulting almanacs, casting horoscopes, and examining the physiognomy of victims or suspects crudely equivalent to a modern crime lab's microscopy and genomic testing, its psychological assessments and polygraphed interrogations.
Study of this astral surveillance suggests not only that we reprise our assumptions about astrology's decline, but also that we can extend our understanding of embodiment, especially contemporary explanations for why people were physically distinct from one another, and how these perceptions made somatic variation the basis for social discrimination. Drawing on the ancient authority of Hippocrates and Galen, early moderns considered that everyone's physiology, their ‘temperament’ or ‘complexion’, comprised a combination of elemental humours: the sanguine, phlegm, choler (or yellow bile), and melancholy (or black bile). For scholars concerned with this paradigm's implications for social inequality, a recent focus has been the role of the environment, or ‘climate’, in shaping people's bodily complexions. Yet, when discussed in terms of a so-called geohumoralism,Footnote 11 we risk foreshortening our own understanding of seventeenth-century explanations for human variation. If people ranged the cosmos looking to explain themselves and their worldly differences, we cannot afford to ignore the ramifications of what should more accurately be termed astro-humoralism. As John Gadbury expounded in his 1668 almanac:
all Nations or People are made of one Blood. Nevertheless, all Philosophers and Physitians, &c., agree, That this Blood is not equally fermented in all Persons; nor yet are the conduit pipes or channels which it passeth, or where it principally circulates, alike in all bodies: whence proceeds the differences of appetites, affections and passions in, and among Men and Women: This alone being the propinquinate cause, as the Stars are the remote causes of such differences.Footnote 12
I
Those claiming to be adepts at astrology applied their skills to the pedestrian pursuit of stray persons and property nonetheless. Forman's case-notes show that restitution of goods as well as health was all in a day's work. One moment he treats melancholy, the next he consults pro rebus fur.Footnote 13 Perhaps preoccupied with his angelic communions, Dee's records are more trenchant. Yet, the very partiality of one memorandum about a jewellery thief suggests Dee was able to flesh out the unwritten features of the suspect's person on the basis of the celestial circumstances at the time of the robbery.Footnote 14 In his landmark treatise, Christian astrology, Lilly explained how he recovered stolen monies by adhering to an exquisitely detailed calculation, which fellow practitioners and his client had disputed.Footnote 15 Lilly trumpeted his success at detection to establish his authority as an astrologer, and, paradoxically, to promote best-selling publications allowing a diverse audience to practise the same.Footnote 16
Astral surveillance was not the domain of a bookish minority. Genteel and middling people sought the advice of experts touted in the colophons of these same publications, or by handbills promising services ranging from medical therapy to figure-casting and one-on-one tuition in the same.Footnote 17 They performed astrological calculations to order their own lives, aided perhaps by printed templates.Footnote 18 Norris Purslow, a Wapping clothier, kept an archive of horoscopes for his entire adult life.Footnote 19 So too a Sussex merchant, Samuel Jeake. Horoscopes were the basis for a diary accounting for the ebbs and flows of Jeake's business as well as his health, while the diary itself functioned as a record against which he tested astrology's tenets – tenets he learned from his father, by studying the day's main publications, and by corresponding with other practitioners.Footnote 20 The acumen and litigiousness of Jeake's contemporary, James Boevey, an Anglo-Dutch financier, also seems to have had some basis in astrology and its capacity for a particular sort of discrimination. We know Boevey wrote extensively on this and related subjects, and that his personal mantra was ‘red-haired men never [have] any kindness for [me]’.Footnote 21 His friend and biographer, John Aubrey, noted Boevey was fortunate because ‘in all his travels he was never robbed’, apparently assuming that Boevey was fore-armed with knowledge of the most propitious times for journeys which avoided persons of malign intent and/or auburn locks.Footnote 22
The labouring sort consulted cunning folk, who relied as much on oral lore as prescribed tenets or scripted calculations when formulating a profile of persons wanted yet unknown.Footnote 23 Humbler people also called upon those who were, as Lilly put it, ‘niblers’ at the art.Footnote 24 Before the courts, we find cutlers, glovers, chandlers, millers, woolcombers, and cordwainers vindicating, even acknowledging en passant, their engagement with so-called ‘lawful questions’ in astrology.Footnote 25 When these questions concerned criminal detection, their answers evidently had the approbation of at least some of the community, perhaps supplemented makeshift household economies, and might even have involved participation in warrant hearings.Footnote 26
About the time he began policing the mores of the people of Aylsham, Robert Doughty, a justice from Restoration Norfolk, commenced a précis of astrology. Although we cannot be sure of the purpose behind the squire's compilation, and the extant manuscript is incomplete, it is nevertheless intriguing to speculate about how Doughty's magistracy may have been shaped, even if indirectly, by such assumptions as: ‘When [Saturn] doth reygne there is much theft used & little charity much lying & much Laweing one against another, & great Imprisoning & much debate & great Swearing.’ Or ‘the man that is borne under Saturne shalbe false envious & full of debate & full of Law … & he shall have stinking breath & he shalbe heavy, thoughtfull & malicious … , shall have little eyes, black haire, great lips, broad shoulders & shall looke downewards’.Footnote 27
The social dominance of the gentry was ideally tempered with charitable benevolence. Elite women dispensed medical aid to their tenants.Footnote 28 We have numerous recipe books attesting to this; some capture astrologically based therapeutics. Lady Ann Fanshawe's domestic miscellany, from the third quarter of the seventeenth century, sensibly reminded her that the crab claws needed to make an anti-pyretic should be ‘taken when the Sunne is in Cancer in June, or the beginning of July (for then they have much more Vertue then at other times)’.Footnote 29 With reference to consulting the ‘testimonies of the planets’, the household jottings of Cecilia (Bindloss) Standish suggest assistance of another, related sort was sometimes at hand. Hailing from rural Lancashire, Lady Standish resorted to astrology for insight concerning members of her family, their health, longevity, marital happiness, and, understandably for someone of pedigree, implicitly their fertility too. Nonetheless, she made astrological calculations regarding lost property for others, including one Jane Bateson whose house had been ‘broken open’ in 1662.Footnote 30
II
People practising astrology, whom I shall refer to collectively as astrologers, cast figures, drew up schemes or horoscopes, for their clients. Figures situated a client in time and terrestrial space, and, with this vector established, plotted the relative position of the planets so that the influence of the celestial configuration on the client could be triangulated and the effects interpreted.Footnote 31 Situating a client was a contested business. Some of the circumstances in which astrologers were consulted were said to require only the factoring of the here and the now. However, reference could also be made to the client's person and their past. Their geniture or nativity, the celestial configuration at birth, was believed capable of resolving a present predicament or making a prediction on the basis of forecasting planetary influences on the client, which were still over the horizon so to speak.
Prediction was perilously ambiguous. It was the perennial target of astrology's opponents. Opposition was not merely technical. Beyond doubts about the ability to account accurately for time's passage and to compute the geometry of what was literally a cosmic array of influences, early modern English people, like their medieval ancestors and European cousins, worried that celestial prognostication clashed with Christian prophecy. Many argued that to gauge what would happen was to gainsay God.Footnote 32 Divine providence, perhaps a miraculous re-alignment of the heavens, would always foil attempts to see into the future.Footnote 33 Therefore, those claiming the contrary, that the stars could be deciphered and time mastered by mere mortals, were sometimes assumed to be subject to devilish tutelage-cum-delusion.Footnote 34
Such objections encouraged de facto reform of astrology, and the scope for prediction narrowed. Foretelling discrete events years ahead of time or speculating on the exact fates of other people, particularly the powerful, fell from favour. Historiography suggests that disenchantment with this so-called judicial astrology was already in motion by the later sixteenth century.Footnote 35 A more circumscribed prognosis persisted, although it did not go unchallenged. This assaying considered queries, or ‘interrogations’, such as should the sick be given one therapy over another, and according to what regimen? Mundane probabilities (what sort of person will I marry and how many children will we have? to what occupations am I best suited?) were licit and popular.Footnote 36 These practices remained acceptable precisely because inquiry was not supernatural but natural; it referred to the physiognomy of the person consulting the astrologer, who might just as easily be a practitioner of physic like Forman.Footnote 37 After all, almanacs habitually gave advice concerning diet and the most appropriate times to bathe, purge, or be bled.Footnote 38 And Thomas Bretnor's 1613 annual argued not only that doctors must use their clients’ horoscopes to help customize treatments for individuals, but also that clients return the compliment by judging their physicians’ professional fitness on the basis of their physiques.Footnote 39
Astral surveillance of crime was probably not regarded as predictive forecasting. As Gresham's records suggest, astrologers established the celestial configuration at the time of the crime, and extrapolated retrospectively the identity of the ‘quesited’, the person asked after or responsible. While an astrologer, or suitably primed client, might ultimately nominate a suspect, identifying an individual by name or relation to the client, surveillance first dealt in typicality, particular sorts or categories of people. Elias Ashmole, herald, antiquary, numismatist, and the man who preserved the archives permitting historians to reconstruct the careers of Dee, Forman, and Lilly, maintained a journal that shows him casting figures in relation to all kinds of personal matters. He advised on felonies as diverse as the theft of a petticoat or the slaying of a horse. For the latter he concluded in October 1650:
It doth appear to be [a person of jovial complexion or a Jovialist] who killed the horse and represents one that the quaerent had some difference with about the beginning of August last (for then [Jupiter] and [Mercury] were in [quartile i.e. at a 90° angle]) a servile fellow [Jupiter] in [Scorpio] signifies a fleshy drunken fellow full-faced a kind of a dark chestnut or black hair having some scars and pock-holes in his face living North from the quaerent's house or North-East.Footnote 40
Or as Lilly discoursed on an exemplary figure for ‘a servant fled’:
The ascendant, and [Mercury] in [Aquarius], together with [Mars] posited in the ascendant, did signifie the Master of the Servant, who was short of stature, corpulent, of a good complexion, and ruddy, fresh countenance; his fatnesse I conceive from the North Latitude of [Mercury], which was about one degree; as also, that the degrees ascending were in the Termes of [Mars], in an ayëry Signe, and in the Face or Decanate of [the Sun], now posited in a watry Signe, and in partill [trine i.e. an aspect of 120°] to [the Moon], both in moyst Signes, which argued a flegmatick, full body, &c.
The Significator of the Servant was [Mars] peculiarly in this Figure, although many times [Mercury] shall signifie a fugitive Servant: The Servant was a young Fellow of about nineteen, a well set Fellow, short, big joynted, broad and full faced, dark brown hair, his teeth growing ill favouredly, a Sun burnt, obscure complexion, yet the skin of his body cleer.Footnote 41
III
The combination of humours comprising an individual's complexion explained physical characteristics as well as mental capacity or behavioural propensities. This logic also worked in reverse: one's physiognomy, whether read in one's face, palm, or stature, was evidence of both personality and innate humoral balance.Footnote 42 Different combinations sustained different bodies. Health was fundamentally a question of maintaining the peculiar mixture with which one had been born. In a fallen world, it was impossible to expect that anybody would possess a physiology with the humours in perfect, perpetual balance.
Physicians advised that many people's native humoral bias should not be considered singularly sanguineous, phlegmatic, choleric, or melancholic. They thought in terms of combinations. So did astrologers when they said that the celestial signs ‘mix their significations’.Footnote 43 In his unfinished collection of biographies, John Aubrey, the aforementioned antiquary and a friend of Ashmole's, drew connections between personage and personality, explaining how his subjects’ characters were reflected in their complexions; their physiques indicative of their achievements.Footnote 44 Aubrey verified such links with reference to natal horoscopes. Some he calculated for the purpose, others he assembled with the help of fellow natural philosophers.Footnote 45 Perhaps Aubrey's single-longest commentary on bodily appearance came in his life of political philosopher Thomas Hobbes, his extensive notes concluding, ‘He was Sanguineo-melancholicus; which the physiologers say is the most ingeniose complexion.’Footnote 46 The sanguine and melancholic humours were, so to speak, co-dominant in Hobbes's temperament. The sanguine were typically rulers; melancholics scholarly by inclination. For his biography of Sir William Petty, physician, political economist, and inaugural president of Dublin's natural philosophical society, Aubrey corresponded with Charles Snell, esquire, of Hampshire. Snell's recollection of Petty, native to the same county and someone diffident about both his humble origins and running away to sea as a young man, included a horoscope. From it, Aubrey observed:
The Complexion of the Native seemeth to bee phlegmatique, or at least phlegmatique sanguine, the body strong, well composed, somewhat inclining to tallnesse, the hayre dark-flaxen; but the hayre very often according to the parents.
The Native certainly is of a very healthfull constitution … The cholerique and Saturnine humours stirred up by the [opposition] of [Mars] to the sixth house and [Venus] in it … are very much alleviated by [Luna] Lady of the sixth in [sextile: i.e. at a 60° angle] to it.Footnote 47
Petty's inclination for maritime adventure, and his long stint surveying in Ireland too, could be explained by his native temperament, dominated as it was by phlegm, which was elementarily cold and wet.
As it was axiomatic that the humours made the human body a microcosm of nature, so the heavens were believed principally responsible for varying humoral combinations, which made human bodies at once different yet fundamentally similar. Almanacs inventoried the nature of the seven planets, or wandering stars, and therefore their humoral character.Footnote 48 For example, ‘Saturne is a Planet cold and dry, not altering his coldnesse, because it is a quality active; but his drynesse a quality passive: … of colour pale and wan, like to lead.’Footnote 49 A treatise like Christian astrology might elaborate that Saturn ‘being far removed from the heat of the Sun’ was ‘Melancholick, Earthly, Masculine, … author of Solitarinesse, Malevolent, &c.’Footnote 50 By way of contrasting example, Jupiter's ‘quality is hot and moist, temperate, sanguine’.Footnote 51 Exactly how the planets operated upon ‘inferior bodies’ was controversial, with precedence given variously to light, heat, motion, or magnetism.Footnote 52 Nevertheless, there was agreement that each planet's influences, or ‘vertues’, differed in temporal and spatial terms.Footnote 53 A principal variable was the interrelationship of the celestial bodies themselves. Different spatial alignments, or ‘aspects’, meant that a given planet's influence was temporarily and relatively stronger or weaker compared with the others.
Furthermore, each planet's influence was refracted and therefore altered by its orientation toward the fixed stars, the constellations symbolized by the zodiac. Each constellation had its own temper and influence.Footnote 54 For example, Henry Alleyn's almanac schema for January 1606 explained how ‘Aquarius, the signe which the Sunne entereth into, the tenth day of this present month, is of the West, masculine, ayrie, and sanguine.’Footnote 55 Once again, weightier tomes iterated further layers of detail.Footnote 56 There were, therefore, myriad combinations of celestial influences radiating to earth, and a cascade of astrological publications sought to identify, catalogue, and track them. As secondary causes, or God's instruments, there must ultimately be an order to the heavenly bodies.Footnote 57 It was the accounting for multiple influences that explains how astrologers could offer rival interpretations, and why people persisted in using horoscopes even after they had apparently failed to resolve a particular situation. The failure must be one of ignorant miscalculation or deliberate fraud on the part of those claiming expertise, rather than the absence of such influences per se.Footnote 58
With natal horoscopes, astrologers plotted the heavenly situation at the time of a client's birth.Footnote 59 This situation was sectioned into twelve houses, each an arc of 30 degrees and corresponding to a different facet of the client's life. The state of the first house, lying due east, is the most relevant here. The arrangement of that celestial zone corresponded with a person's physique, intellect, and manners. In his textbook, Genethlialogia, ‘whereby, any man (even of an Ordinary Capacity) may be enabled to discover the most Remarkable and Occult Accidents of his Life’, Gadbury stated that the first house ‘hath proper Signification of the Life of the Native; his Stature, Form, and Shape; the Temperature and Accidents of the Body; the Qualities of the Minde … as Galen saith: the Visage, its Fashion, Complexion, and Colour, and all the Parts thereof’.Footnote 60
To reprise some of our earlier examples of celestial influence in terms of their repercussions for somatic variety, Jupiter was said to give an ‘upright tall stature, ruddy Complexion, oval Visage, the Forehead high and large, a large grey Eye, brown hair, of a [Chestnut]-colour, the Body every way well compos'd, and the Person, whether Man or Woman, is sober, grave, discreet, and of a noble disposition’.Footnote 61 And Aquarius ‘shews one of a tall well-set thick corporature, of a strong body, of a long visage, sanguine complexion; if Saturn be therein, he gives black hair; otherwise commonly the party signified thereby, is of a fair flaxen hair, and of a paler whiter countenance’.Footnote 62 As we can see from this last example, astrologers aimed to trace which star ruled the first house, and therefore had the most significant impact on their subject's physique. Yet, they often had to factor into the equation the ruling star's diverse relation to other heavenly bodies, thus heightening or diminishing both positive and negative effects of the relatively dominant planet. In a similar vein:
The Conjunction of Jupiter and Mars, if Jupiter be significator makes the native chollerick, hasty, angery, bold, proud, presumptious [sic] and daring; gives him some Martial Command, and gives him glory and renown in War-like undertakings: but if Mars be significator, it makes him milder, religious, good, just, gives him preferment in the Law, or he becomes a Priest, Deacon, Bishop, or Arch Bishop.Footnote 63
Jeake even attempted his own quantification of these effects that, to risk anachronism, we might describe as a kind of astro-genetic frequency, an early modern DNA profile.Footnote 64 He tabulated the influences present when he was born, categorizing each in terms of its elemental quality and rating its strength on an ascending scale from one to six. Finding that the hot and dry elements had the highest score, he had a basis for deeming his complexion fundamentally predisposed to the choleric.
The configuration of the other houses also spoke to physicality. The sixth house, alluded to in Aubrey's evaluation of Petty's nativity, was revelatory of a person's lifelong predisposition to particular diseases; the weak points of their innate complexion.Footnote 65 Scrutiny was considered capable of testing candidates for employment, of discerning those who were honest and would best suit the employer's own temperament. Ashmole used horoscopes to assay the characters of his and others’ servants, lodgers, and apprentices before contracts or indentures were completed – a type of crime prevention when letters of reference were unavailable or untrustworthy.Footnote 66 The seventh house indicated the sorts of people, or personalities, one should have as friends or adversaries.Footnote 67 Likewise this house's configuration allowed astrologers to sketch the identity of suspects responsible for harming the client, whose own character was established courtesy of the first house.Footnote 68
IV
Assessment of the seventh house permitted astrologers to gauge not only the degree of marital bliss one would enjoy, but also the appearance and deportment, even the ethnic origin, of one's ideal partner.Footnote 69 Indeed, astrologers suggested a match was best made with reference to the degree of compatibility witnessed between the partners’ paired horoscopes and persons.Footnote 70 If the prospective partner's nativity was unavailable, astrologers might use their complexion as a substitute.Footnote 71
This last circumstance raises the issue of what we would term biological inheritance, the transmission of traits from parents to offspring.Footnote 72 Reproduction was a process that many believed finally resolved by the stars.Footnote 73 Didactic literature for would-be parents usually framed procreation as a process of humoral recombination. Generational inheritance was about seeds mixing; the result of paternal and maternal contributions, begotten of corresponding humoral temperatures, competing to define the child's own complexion in utero. The much-studied guide to human fertility, Aristotle's masterpiece, explained how couples could have a son rather than a daughter, even a child appearing more like the father than the mother.Footnote 74 For a son, who would be a chip off the old block, recommendations were made so that the male seed would be vigorous and prevail at conception. Husbands were to monitor their diets’ humoral consequences and be active in bed. However, the last, most striking, instruction was that intercourse should occur under specific (masculine) constellations, otherwise hinting that everything would be for naught. Other advice-books shared this logic, one that might easily have been borrowed from astrological treatises.Footnote 75 In forecasting for the coming year, almanacs flagged when would be a ‘good Season to get Children in’.Footnote 76 Astrologers accepting the effectiveness of sigils, which would draw down or repel celestial influences, suggested wearing these talismans during intercourse,Footnote 77 and were otherwise asked to verify paternity.Footnote 78 Almanacs advised on other sorts of husbandry; when to sow particular seeds, graft plants, or have mares covered.Footnote 79 For some parents, it may have seemed simpler still. Their union and the character of their offspring were foreshadowed in, and explained by, their own nativities. Hence, Jeake fathomed his geniture by correlating it with his parents’ nativities, and he represented this sidereal lineage graphically using the pendant forms one usually associates with heraldic pedigrees. He evaluated the celestial situation on his wedding night, his bride's horoscope, and, eventually, their daughter's.Footnote 80
Astrologers, and virtually anyone who voiced an opinion on astrology's validity, debated the definition of nativity. Most probably assumed that parturition was a defining moment. Parents, or their kin, laboured to record the day, hour, and, if possible, the minute of birth, not so much for the sake of posterity but, rather, to put this data to astrological use.Footnote 81 Indeed, this practice itself contributed to what has been described as a horological revolution.Footnote 82 Understandably, many records were left in the margins of almanacs. We are just beginning to appreciate the extent of life-writing facilitated by these publications, hundreds of thousands of which circulated annually.Footnote 83 There are, however, some surviving instances where official records served similar ends. The principal genethliacal details for future cleric Samuel Smith were recorded in the baptismal register for St Thomas's, Dudley, Worcestershire, on 29 February 1584. Not too surprising given that his father was vicar there.Footnote 84 More eccentric are Henry Crabtree's notations. Having baptized the days-old James Taylor in late 1685, Crabtree, a Lancashire curate, occasional almanac writer and physician, implied that he would soon be burying the infant, scribbling in the parish register that poor James's horoscope included a ‘sure token of short life’.Footnote 85
Astrologers grumbled that clients were ignorant of their vital statistics, or could not proffer them with suitable accuracy such that any advice would itself lack precision.Footnote 86 Those accepting the importance of a querist's birthday were confronted with complications. For instance, if labour were protracted was the emergence of the child's head decisive, sufficient to count as birth? What if the baby were breeched and the feet delivered first – did one wait for the head?Footnote 87 Astrologers were preoccupied with locating nativity in time and space because this allowed them to calculate the celestial influences that had left their mark on their clients. For instance, opposite a genethliac scheme for a son named after his own father, Arthur Dee drew, at some point post-1606, a male figure surrounded by geometric stippling suggesting the heavenly radiations at work on the boy.Footnote 88 Celestial configurations were likened to seals or stamps that had impressed the flesh and turned what would otherwise have been shapeless blobs of wax into distinctive insignia.Footnote 89 Similar metaphors were used by those who contended that life began at conception, and who therefore counted back to the stellar situation at that conjunction.Footnote 90 In either case, these metaphors verge on the deterministic. We have already seen how astrologers were remarkably persistent in linking the different stars with various body types. The language employed to draw these connections is telling. The planets ‘cause’, ‘give’, ‘maketh’, ‘prescribe’, or ‘personate’ individuals ‘born under’ them.Footnote 91
Yet, these circumstances neither made reproduction an entirely random process, nor one's existence simply a question of how lucky one's stars happened to be. Jeake reasoned:
As some pretend that nothing proceeds from an Astral Cause by way of hidden influence, but only by the visible influences of Light & heat: so others run into the contrary extreme and affirm that every effect proceeds from an Astral Cause. But this is also an Error. For as it is from the nature of the seed, & not from the Stars that a man begets a man & not a beast: the Stars only influencing & qualifying the matter they find to work upon.Footnote 92
Henry Coley, a joiner's son and an autodidact who had been apprenticed tailor, explained how an ‘Ordinary Person or Rustick’ and a nobleman born under exactly the same heavenly configuration would nonetheless have distinct personages as well as lives. Their respectively humble or genteel lineages meant that they were already of different stuff, wax of different clarity, which the stars then sealed.Footnote 93 Further, Coley's mentor, William Lilly, suggested that the clarity of the wax affected what sorts of impressions it could receive.Footnote 94 Hence base-born people did very often not transcend their parents’ lowly origins even if born under the most auspicious skies.
V
Contemporaries wrestled with the deterministic implications of astrology. To prognosticate about an individual's wellbeing, their best partners, or the occupation most suited to their person, was surely to assume that their life's pathway was set down, at least in outline, from birth.Footnote 95 Astrology's wisdom was damned either way when it came to the eschatological crossroads of early modern Protestantism. On the one hand, prognostication prescribed an otherwise ineffable predestiny. Only God was meant to know who were elect; those already sainted to be saved. On the other hand, cosmic necessity contradicted earthly autonomy. Astrology's alleged capacity to read the fates seemed to refute the exercise of free will and moral choice by mortals unable to evade the effects of celestial forces.Footnote 96
It is easy to exaggerate the remoteness of seventeenth-century reticence concerning physical permanence from modern emphases on a biological determinism, so vocal did criticism of astrology become. In other words, the contingency highlighted by several of astrology's opponents is apparently consistent with modern scholarly assessments that the humoral body, fluid and permeable, precluded any sort of essentialism. However, we should look beyond the hyperbole and recognize what the majority of astrological adherents, and even their most ardent detractors, shared.Footnote 97
Few maintained that the stars dictated people's fates. Rather, under their influence, different people were inclined to live, to think and behave, in particular ways.Footnote 98 Most practitioners, as well as those wary of astrology, agreed that the stars did govern, establish from birth, one's mortal form. Hence Thomas Tryon, a self-educated shepherd prone to heterodox religious beliefs and medical theories, insisted that astrology properly practised allowed him ‘to discern the Complexion and Qualities of Animals, Minerals, and Vegetations … and likewise best understand[s] the human Nature and himself; for there is an Astrology within Man, as well as without him’.Footnote 99 Thinking its superstitious vagaries were the expedients of social upstarts cum political radicals, the royalist William Ramesey advocated astrology's active retrenchment, not trusting it to atrophy among ignorant plebs. However, dedicating his effort to James Stuart, Ramesey reserved one vital role for the discipline: ‘How to Judge of the particular Constitution and Temperature of the Body, and the Natural inclination of Man.’Footnote 100 Yet, similarly, John Partridge, son of a Thames waterman, apprentice cobbler turned astrologer, and staunchly whig opponent of James Stuart as the next king, explained in the preface of his own 1679 attempt at a reformed discipline:
Creation and Being, is the Power of a Deity only; but the quality of this Being, is by the great Keeper of Nature committed to the course of second Causes; These … are divided into several Streams or Currents; some gliding by the Banks with a pleasant murmur, while other Currents with their Rapid motion, act with greater vigor and force; this is the beginning of Action and Passion.Footnote 101
In short, astrological discourse relied on a dualistic understanding of humanity. The immortal, immaterial soul and its bestowing was supernatural, a divine mystery. The natural body, as the soul's residence, was variously its temple and its prison. The material burden of the flesh, with its peculiar humoral quality, weighed on the mind, affecting one's intellect and emotions, but volition and therefore faith were the soul's counter-balance.Footnote 102 When assessing his wife's nativity, Jeake noted contentedly that a mercurial sign in the ascendant promised she would have a goodly share of wit and ingenuity. Yet he added:
How many Nativityes have I seen that naturally come short in this particular of such a [Mercurial] influx: and yet the Subjects by assiduity & improvement of their portions have become eminent. Herein consists virtue, to repress such inclinations as tend to impertinency … Astral inclinations may be an exercise; not a rule of [?earthly] behaviour: this being regulated by an higher Law.Footnote 103
These philosophical issues were confined neither to introspective autobiography nor to theological tracts. As Richard Kirby opined in the preface to his 1684 almanac, ‘Let Man live meerly as a Natural Man, without Spark of Grace, the Influence of the Stars predominates; but where Grace rules, the Stars obey.’Footnote 104
Astrology's advocates lauded its practice as a means to self-knowledge. If a man realized he was born with Mars in the ascendant, and therefore of a choleric complexion, he could take appropriate action to curb a native irascibility.Footnote 105 People took the measure of psychological and physical differences according to what their nativity presaged. Hence, Thomas Browne remarked in his Religio medici: ‘At my Nativity, my Ascendant was the earthly signe of Scorpio, I was borne in the Planetary houre of Saturne, and I thinke I have a piece of that Leaden Planet in me. I am no way facetious, nor disposed for the mirth and galliardize of company.’Footnote 106 Recalling her youth, Lady Anne Clifford wrote:
I was through the providence of God begotten by my valiant father and my worthy mother the first day of May in [1589] … John Denham, a greate astronomer … would often say Thatt I had much in mee in nature to shew that the sweete Influences of the Pleiades and the Bands of Orion mentioned in the [Book of Job], were powerfull both at my Conception and Nativity.Footnote 107
Either by his own design or that of friends, Robert Burton, the suffering scholar of all things saturnine, was memorialized – by a suitably dark complexioned portrait bust and engraved horoscope – as the arch-melancholic whom nature had ordained to write black bile's anatomy.Footnote 108
VI
Reassessing Columbus's geographical trajectory in 1492, Nicolás Wey Gómez has highlighted the importance of an intellectual tradition that ‘conceived of place as the basis for explaining and predicting the constitution and behavior of all creatures in the “machine” of the cosmos … Place was largely the medium through which celestial bodies imparted form to sublunary creatures.’Footnote 109 Belatedly attempting to emulate so as to surpass the endeavours of Iberian conquistadors, when they ventured into the western or southern hemispheres, the English too employed astrological reckoning. Yet, establishing precisely how often they did so is a challenging task. Archival censuses and associated scholarship have tended to gloss over evidence of astral surveillance, instead foregrounding materials that seem to represent the modern disciplines of astronomy and meteorology. For instance, William Jackson prefaced the journal he kept as a crusading privateer on the Spanish Main with a paean to astrologers like Lilly and John Booker, but this praise was omitted from the modern transcription.Footnote 110 When the next generation of buccaneers also targeted Spanish interests in the Pacific during the 1680s, William Dampier recalled, in unpublished marginal annotations to his journal, that Charles Swan's crew had included an astrologer.Footnote 111 Likewise, only the most recent cataloguing of Edward Maynard's navigational commonplace-book hints at its true content. While the majority of its folios track later seventeenth-century Atlantic voyages, the volume includes Maynard's own epitome of astrology, which carefully details the ties binding different peoples and places with the cosmos.Footnote 112
Astrology remained a heuristic device useful for understanding foreign climes: flora and fauna as foods, commodities, and medicines; indigenous inhabitants as strangers, allies, or enemies. Thus, realizing that ephemerides would need to be recalculated for the new latitudes, Gadbury was commissioned by imperial bureaucrats to compute tables for, and offer advice to, Jamaican planters.Footnote 113 Coley averred in his almanac for 1679:
The Causes and Beginnings of mutations of Inferiour things ought to be taken from the variety of the Planets and fixed Stars &c … the Stars are the causes of the variation of inferiour things, either because the Stars move, or the earth, or both … Four times this year will the Luminaries be Eclipsed … The third … is of the Sun September 24, at 6 at night, not visible to us … But in New Zealand, and to those that sail upon the Pacifick Ocean it will appear a great Eclipse.Footnote 114
More succinctly, Jonathan Dove gave approximately the same assessment regarding ‘such as inhabit new Zealand[,] the Isle of S. Peter [i.e. St. Peter's Island in the Great Australian Bight]’.Footnote 115 These are two of the earliest references to southern Oceania and its denizens appearing in vernacular print. Closer to home, John Booker had tried to explain the turmoil of the civil wars by ascribing Irish rebellion, and forthcoming English vengeance, to intersecting ‘national’ horoscopes and rival temperaments.Footnote 116
If we remain earth-bound when assessing the implications of the humoral paradigm for early modern perceptions of somatic difference, we miss something important about the temper of these estimations of fellow human beings. This is not to doubt that complexions were considered contingent. Native humoral balances were forever precarious. And terrestrial horizons, or climatic latitudes, were important. Where people were born and lived on Earth was paramount. Ptolemaic, geocentric assumptions lingered amid Copernican revolutions, and for ordinary folk earthly circumstances often mattered most.Footnote 117 Nevertheless, the alleged fluidity of the humoral body has allowed some to take comfort in the notion that early moderns could not easily conceive of the permanent, innate bodily contrasts that would eventually underpin a racial hierarchy.Footnote 118 Contrariwise, evaluations of non-European peoples that appear to strain credulity are assumed to be an insincere, conniving convenience cloaking what must surely have been an incipient – if not insidious – racial prejudice. The archetypal example in this last regard concerns sub-Saharan Africans, and the commonplace that they were ‘black’ because of persistent exposure to the sun.Footnote 119 Reiterated in isolation by modern scholarship, the idea that African people were casualties of solar radiation can therefore seem asymmetrical, absurdly biased, possibly because we now think of ourselves as earthlings all living in a heliostatic, heliotropic galaxy.
Yet, to early moderns such an idea was never singular. The entire range of human variation was explained with reference to the radiance of all celestial bodies. For instance, what we now think of as freckles or melanomas were considered tokens of one's cosmic affiliations. Naevi were impressed at birth according to the planetary aspects. Freckles and moles were not the result of exposure to the sun's ultraviolet rays, rather contact with various stellar influences.Footnote 120 Claims that parallel those for Africans and the sun, specifically the sun under Capricorn, were made for other peoples of the world. For example, Jeake considered the
whole Earth is governed by the whole heaven; but each part thereof distinctly, cannot so plainly be subjected to all the heavenly host; for it evidently appears by the diversity of the soyle that some parts of earth have greater affinity with some parts of heaven, then with others; & by more free absorption of such particles will speedily be brought under their dominion: the ground thus impregnated, & holding a continual correspondence with [its] governor must necessarily by ingresse of these particles affect the natives with the qualityes proceeding from such parts of heaven. Thus Holland is … governed by … [Pisces] & … [Moon], by whose properties judgment is to be given of the manners of the Natives.Footnote 121
That is, as a people, the Dutch were generally phlegmatic in character, which complexion allegedly explained in turn their appetite for alcoholic beverages, as well, of course, as all that butter they, as first-rate mariners, insisted on taking to sea.Footnote 122 Although rooted in a different premise, one with a wider social currency and longer cultural life than some histories of early modern English astrology admit, the final effect was a typecasting that takes us from vocational aptitude or personality types, and ever closer to ethnic segregation and the taxonomies we associate with racism.Footnote 123