Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T05:59:38.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of tinnitus severity and associated risk factors in patients with chronic otitis media: data from the multinational collaborative Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2022

B V Tailor*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich
J S Phillips
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich
I Nunney
Affiliation:
Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich
M W Yung
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich
C Doruk
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Istanbul University, Turkey
H Kara
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Istanbul University, Turkey
T Kong
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Gangwon-do, South Korea
N Quaranta
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy
A Peñaranda
Affiliation:
Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Universidad de Los Andes School of Medicine, Bogota, Colombia
D Bernardeschi
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Group Hospital, Paris, France
C Dai
Affiliation:
Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Eye and Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
R Kania
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
F Denoyelle
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
T Tono
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miyazaki, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Dr B V Tailor, Department of Otolaryngology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, NorfolkNR4 7UY, UK E-mail: Bhavesh.tailor@cantab.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Subjective tinnitus is a common symptom, and there is often an underlying otological cause. This study investigated the degree of tinnitus-related annoyance in patients with chronic otitis media and analysed whether associations with tinnitus severity exist.

Method

The multinational collaborative Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 study collected prospective data on 478 adult patients suffering from chronic otitis media across 9 otology referral centres in 8 countries. Based on this dataset, we investigated tinnitus severity using participant responses to item 7 of a native version of the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12.

Results

With respect to tinnitus severity, 23.8 per cent, 17.4 per cent, 15.5 per cent, and 43.4 per cent of participants reported no, minor, moderate, and major inconvenience or greater, respectively. The absence of ear discharge, absence of cholesteatoma, and poorer disease-specific health-related quality-of-life were associated with increased tinnitus severity in patients with chronic otitis media, whereas age, hearing disability and geographical region showed no association.

Conclusion

This analysis provided novel insight into potential risk factors for tinnitus in patients with chronic otitis media.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Introduction

Tinnitus is defined as the perception of sound in the absence of an external acoustic source. It is a common complaint, with prevalence estimates ranging from 5.1 to 42.7 per cent in the adult population worldwide and a general trend of tinnitus prevalence increasing with age.Reference McCormack, Edmondson-Jones, Somerset and Hall1 In most cases, tinnitus is a subjective phenomenon, and there is often an underlying otological problem, most commonly hearing loss related to ageing, noise exposure or acoustic trauma.Reference Han, Lee, Kim, Lim and Shin2Reference Eggermont and Roberts4 Although some patients with a primary tinnitus complaint have normal hearing thresholds,Reference Schaette and McAlpine5 several studies have shown that perceived tinnitus severity is greater in hearing-impaired individuals than in tinnitus sufferers with clinically normal hearing.Reference Mahafza, Zhao, El Refaie and Chen6Reference Axelsson and Ringdahl8 This is reflected in the use of pure-tone audiometry in addition to psychometric testing using validated patient-reported questionnaires to stratify tinnitus patients and assign specific interventions within tinnitus triage pathways.Reference Murphy and Phillips9

Furthermore, several population-based studies have identified a history of middle-ear infection or established chronic otitis media as risk factors for tinnitus.Reference Kostev, Alymova, Kössl and Jacob10Reference Sindhusake, Golding, Newall, Rubin, Jakobsen and Mitchell12 Tinnitus is a frequent complaint in patients with chronic otitis media alongside hearing loss and ear discharge.Reference Kim, Park, Kim, Lee, Park and Yeo13,Reference Manche, Madhavi, Meganadh and Jyothy14 Over the last two decades, disease-specific patient-reported instruments have facilitated standardisation of symptom reporting in chronic otitis media, complementing traditional markers of disease activity such as clinical assessment and audiometry. Such tools capture the overall burden of disease from the patients’ perspective and provide a comparable measure of health-related quality of life (QoL).Reference Phillips and Yung15 Among static instruments for chronic otitis media, three questionnaires assess the degree of annoyance or frequency of tinnitus.Reference Baumann, Kurpiers, Plinkert and Praetorius16Reference Bächinger, Röösli, Ditzen and Huber18

In recent years, there have been many studies evaluating the association between tinnitus and a wide range of demographic, socioeconomic, behavioural and clinical factors in the general population.Reference Kostev, Alymova, Kössl and Jacob10Reference Sindhusake, Golding, Newall, Rubin, Jakobsen and Mitchell12,Reference Kim, Lee, An, Sim, Park and Kim19,Reference Hiller and Goebel20 However, little is known about the factors influencing tinnitus severity in patients with chronic otitis media. The Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 has recently been appraised in a large multinational study of patients with chronic otitis media from otology centres across eight countries.Reference Phillips, Yung, Nunney, Doruk, Kara and Kong21 This dataset presented an opportunity to conduct an exploratory, cross-sectional analysis of tinnitus severity. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the degree of tinnitus-related annoyance in a large cohort of chronic otitis media patients as well as analyse whether associations with tinnitus severity exist.

Materials and methods

Study design

We used data from the multinational collaborative Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 study to perform this cross-sectional analysis. The original study was a prospective multicentre cohort study conducted between December 2018 and August 2019 at nine otology units across eight countries (Shanghai, China; Bogota, Colombia; Paris, France; Bari, Italy; Miyazaki, Japan; Wonju, Korea; Istanbul, Turkey; Ipswich and Norwich, UK). The full methodology is available in the overview publication.Reference Phillips, Yung, Nunney, Doruk, Kara and Kong21 This study abides by the Declaration of Helsinki (1996). At each study site, collaborating primary authors submitted the protocol to their respective institutional review board, resulting in either study approval or exemption. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrolment in the study.

Participants and data sources

Adult patients (aged 16 years or older) with chronic otitis media in one or both ears were invited to complete a respective local version of the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12.Reference Phillips, Yung, Nunney, Doruk, Kara and Kong21 Patients with inactive disease as well as patients who had undergone middle-ear surgery previously were also eligible for inclusion. The original version of the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 in English is provided in Appendix 1. The sole exclusion criterion was an inability to comprehend the written language of the translated Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 as this constituted the focal data. In addition, a standardised proforma was used to provide supplementary information on participant age and gender, pure-tone air conduction threshold audiometry for both ears (at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 kHz) and otoscopic assessment (discharging, dry perforation less than a quarter of the tympanic membrane, dry perforation more than a quarter of the tympanic membrane, non-dry perforation). The presence or absence of cholesteatoma was also noted. No patient identifiable data were captured. Anonymised local data from each study site were securely transferred to the corresponding author (JSP) and assimilated with the UK dataset in this standardised format.

Study variables

The Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 questionnaire contains an item assessing tinnitus severity over the past six months (item 7). Participant responses were presented using a 6-point Likert scale from 0 to 5, corresponding to ‘doesn't bother me at all’ and ‘the worst thing that has ever affected my life’, respectively. A higher item-7 score indicated a greater degree of tinnitus-related annoyance. This became the ordinal outcome variable.

In this study, the following variables were considered as potential risk factors for tinnitus severity: (a) age, (b) overall hearing disability, (c) worse-ear hearing, (d) ear discharge, (e) cholesteatoma, (f) disease-specific health-related QoL and (g) geographical region. Overall hearing disability refers to the degree of binaural hearing loss, calculated by applying the Department of Health and Social Security formula to hearing thresholds determined by pure-tone audiometry using a 4:1 weighting for the better hearing ear: ((4 × average in better ear at 1, 2 and 3 kHz) + (average in worse ear at 1, 2 and 3 kHz))/5. Worse-ear hearing refers to the pure-tone average of hearing threshold levels obtained at all assessed frequencies in the poorer hearing ear. The presence or absence of active ear discharge was determined by clinician-reported otoscopy. Disease-specific health-related QoL was calculated by subtracting the item-7 (tinnitus) score from the total Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 score. In order to model a geographic effect, we used the following region classifiers: Europe (France, Italy, Turkey, UK) and Asia (China, Japan, Korea).

Statistical analyses

Descriptive analyses of the study participants grouped by tinnitus severity were carried out. An ordinal logistic regression model was used to study the association between the defined variables and tinnitus severity. Two-tailed analyses were conducted, and p-values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. The odds ratios, both unadjusted and adjusted, and 95 per cent confidence intervals (CI) for tinnitus severity were calculated. Gender was not reported for UK study participants and therefore has not been included as a variable in the present analyses. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression modelling were performed using SAS statistical software (version 9.4 SAS Institute, Cary, USA).

Results

A total of 478 participants from 8 countries were included in the original study. Consecutive sampling was used to recruit patients during routine out-patient consultation in the specified time period. Only patients meeting the pre-defined eligibility criteria were invited to participate. No study participants withdrew consent following enrolment or participation in the study.

With respect to tinnitus severity, 23.8 per cent, 17.4 per cent, 15.5 per cent and 43.4 per cent of study participants (n = 478) reported no inconvenience, minor inconvenience, moderate inconvenience, and major inconvenience or greater, respectively. Table 1 shows the full descriptive analyses of participants according to the degree of tinnitus severity.

Table 1. Distribution of tinnitus severity and associated participant characteristics*

*n = 478; Tinnitus severity was determined by participant responses to item 7 in the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12. Answers were presented using a 6-point Likert scale (0 = no inconvenience, 1 = minor inconvenience, 2 = moderate inconvenience, 3 = major inconvenience but can cope, 4 = major inconvenience and difficulty coping, 5 = worst thing ever affected life); Overall hearing disability as calculated according to the Department of Health and Social Security formula: ((4 x better hearing ear) + (worse hearing ear))/5; **Mean total Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 score excluding item 7. SD = standard deviation; HRQoL = health-related quality of life

In the ordinal logistic regression analysis, three variables were found to be significantly associated with increasing tinnitus severity: absence of ear discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 1.78; 95 per cent CI = 1.10–2.86; p = 0.0182), absence of cholesteatoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; 95 per cent CI = 1.12–2.82; p = 0.0155) and poorer disease-specific health-related QoL (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; 95 per cent CI = 1.07–1.11; p < 0.0001). However, age, overall hearing disability, worse-ear hearing and geographical region showed no association with severity of tinnitus in the adjusted analyses (Table 2).

Table 2. Ordinal logistic regression analysis of factors associated with severity of tinnitus in patients with chronic otitis media

*n = 478; Significant p-value; Overall hearing disability as calculated according to the Department of Health and Social Security formula: ((4 x better hearing ear) + (worse hearing ear))/5; **Total Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 score excluding item 7. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; HRQoL = health-related quality of life

Discussion

In our multinational cohort of 478 patients with chronic otitis media, 58.9 per cent reported suffering from tinnitus of at least moderate severity. This is consistent with other studies utilising the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 questionnaire to assess disease-specific health-related QoL, with mean item-7 scores ranging from 1.32 to 2.86 (minor-moderate tinnitus severity).Reference Phillips, Haggard and Yung17,Reference Fonseca, Ramos, Balsalobre, Freitas, Phillips and Yung22Reference Celis-Aguilar, Medina-Cabrera, Torrontegui-Zazueta, Núñez-Millán, García-Valle and Ochoa-Miranda25 In three studies evaluating chronic otitis media patients following middle-ear surgery, a large proportion of patients reported tinnitus pre-operatively (42.7 to 47.6 per cent).Reference Kim, Park, Kim, Lee, Park and Yeo13,Reference Baba, Yagi and Fujikura26,Reference Guo, Sun and Wang27 It is evident that tinnitus is a common burden in patients suffering from chronic otitis media alongside hearing impairment and ear discharge. Therefore, in the present study, we sought to determine whether demographic and disease-related factors influence tinnitus severity.

  • Epidemiology of tinnitus in patients with chronic otitis media remains unclear

  • A cross-sectional analysis of tinnitus-related annoyance in chronic otitis media sufferers was conducted

  • Data from the multinational collaborative Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 study were used

  • Presence of ear discharge, cholesteatoma or both is related to a lower degree of perceived tinnitus severity

  • Further studies are necessary to validate these associations and understand the psychopathology of tinnitus in patients with chronic otitis media

Several studies have shown that subjective tinnitus improves following middle-ear surgery, and this appears to coincide with hearing restoration.Reference Kim, Park, Kim, Lee, Park and Yeo13,Reference Guo, Sun and Wang27Reference Habesoglu, Habesoglu, Karatas, Tosun, Gursel and Oysu30 Guo et al.Reference Guo, Sun and Wang27 reported that improved low-frequency air conduction hearing was an important factor in post-operative reduction in tinnitus severity, whereas Kim et al.Reference Kim, Jang, Kim, Seong, Kang and Cho28 proposed that the degree of pre-operative air-bone gap may influence tinnitus outcome following tympanoplasty. The existing literature concerning the possible relationship between improvement in tinnitus severity and audiological outcome in patients with chronic otitis media is limited to small cohort studies within single medical centres, often performed retrospectively.

In comparison, based on a cross-sectional evaluation of tinnitus in a large cohort across nine otology centres, the present study found no significant effect of overall hearing disability and worse-ear hearing on tinnitus severity. Instead, the presence of cholesteatoma and ear discharge was found to be inversely associated with tinnitus severity; that is, chronic otitis media patients with cholesteatoma or discharging ear(s) appear to have less severe tinnitus, which has not previously been reported. In chronic otitis media, both cholesteatoma and persistent otorrhoea through a perforated tympanic membrane indicate an ongoing inflammatory response within the middle-ear cleft. Over time, this can cause ossicular erosion and disruption of the ossicular chain.Reference Mittal, Lisi, Gerring, Mittal, Mathee and Narasimhan31 Tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy is the main curative treatment strategy. The primary objectives of middle-ear surgery are complete removal of disease, provision of a dry ear, and preserved or improved hearing levels. From the patients’ perspective, alongside subjective hearing improvement and relief from otorrhoea, improvement or resolution of tinnitus may influence post-operative patient satisfaction.Reference Erkorkmaz, Yilmaz, Guven and Kaymaz32,Reference Phillips, Haggard, Spencer and Yung33 It is possible that when patients with chronic otitis media have a discharging ear, cholesteatoma or both, there is an expectation that the disease and any associated symptoms are treatable. We propose that such expectations prior to definitive treatment may influence patients’ perception of the disease and reduce the burden of individual symptoms such as tinnitus. In contrast, patients presenting with tinnitus as their primary otological complaint are more likely to be annoyed or distressed by it.Reference Stouffer and Tyler34

In large epidemiological studies, tinnitus severity is directly correlated with increasing age.Reference Kim, Lee, An, Sim, Park and Kim19,Reference Bhatt, Lin and Bhattacharyya35 In contrast, our data suggest that tinnitus severity may decrease with age, although this association is not significant in the adjusted model. A strong association between poorer disease-specific health-related QoL and tinnitus severity was expected since both variables were determined using component scores of the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12, which has high internal consistency as demonstrated in the original study and other validation studies.Reference Phillips, Yung, Nunney, Doruk, Kara and Kong21,Reference Quaranta, De Robertis, Milella, Pontrelli, Greco and Fiorella23,Reference Doruk, Çelik, Kara, Polat, Güldiken and Orhan24,Reference Otoya-Tono, Pérez-Herrera, Peñaranda, Moreno-López, Sánchez-Pedraza and García36

This study used a single-item measure within the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 to determine tinnitus severity in patients with chronic otitis media, focusing on tinnitus-related inconvenience. However, the consensus is that perceived tinnitus severity has multiple dimensions, not only degree of annoyance but also duration, signal intensity or loudness, and associated disability (e.g. sleep disruption).Reference McCormack, Edmondson-Jones, Somerset and Hall1,Reference Hiller and Goebel20 Several validated tinnitus-specific measures exist to assess the level of tinnitus-related distress with varying emphasis on different domains of quality-of-life.Reference Kennedy, Wilson and Stephens37 A single-item measure is therefore unlikely to capture the breadth or complexity of individual experience.Reference McCormack, Edmondson-Jones, Somerset and Hall1 Nevertheless, a single question can serve as a useful screening tool, identifying at-risk patients for whom further assessment or characterisation of their tinnitus is necessary. An expectation for all patients with chronic otitis media to complete a battery of symptom-specific instruments in addition to a disease-specific health-related QoL measure (such as the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12) would only lead to a higher response burden and information overload on the part of the clinician.

One limitation of the present study is that we could not assess the relationship between high frequency hearing loss and tinnitus in our cohort, since pure-tone audiometry was performed between 0.5 kHz and 4 kHz for all study participants. Elevation of hearing threshold levels in high and extended high frequencies (more than 8 kHz) is commonly detected in patients with chronic otitis media and has been noted to persist even after resolution of acute otitis media,Reference Cordeiro, Monsanto, Kasemodel, Gondra and Penido38Reference Park, Park, Kim and Park41 presumably because of penetration of inflammatory mediators and bacterial toxins into the inner ear via the round window membrane.Reference Schachern, Paparella, Goycoolea, Duvall and Choo42,Reference Engel, Blatz, Kellner, Palmer, Weller and Bhadki43 Of note, Cordeiro et al.Reference Cordeiro, Monsanto, Kasemodel, Gondra and Penido38 suggested that the presence of persistent tinnitus six months after an episode of acute otitis media may be associated with worse extended high frequency thresholds. Since pure-tone audiometry was limited to air conduction testing only, we were unable to report the air–bone gap. Chronic otitis media patients with predominantly conductive hearing loss are not distinguishable from patients with underlying and perhaps long-standing sensorineural hearing loss, which may represent distinct cohorts of patients with different experiences of tinnitus.

Due to the brevity of tinnitus assessment, we were unable to characterise whether tinnitus was ipsilateral (localising to the ear affected with chronic otitis media), contralateral or bilateral. It is possible that patients with contralateral or bilateral tinnitus may have chronic otitis media plus sensorineural or mixed hearing loss. Patients with bilateral tinnitus are also more likely to report a greater degree of handicap and psychological burden.Reference Yang, Jung, Kim, Byun, Park and Yeo44 Further characterisation of tinnitus (e.g. localisation, loudness, pitch) in chronic otitis media sufferers in relation to disease-specific health-related QoL should be explored in future studies.

Another limitation is that we were unable to investigate a wide array of demographic, behavioural and socioeconomic characteristics or patient co-morbidities since the number of variables included in the logistic regression analyses was restricted to data available in the dataset from the original study.Reference Phillips, Yung, Nunney, Doruk, Kara and Kong21 For example, we were unable to explore whether there were gender differences in severity of tinnitus since this characteristic was not reported for UK study participants. Nevertheless, this is the first study to examine potential risk factors influencing tinnitus severity in a large, multinational cohort of chronic otitis media patients with prior unknown tinnitus status. The resulting broad range of tinnitus severity within the study population is reflective of real-world clinical practice, thus increasing the robustness of our findings.

Conclusion

This cross-sectional analysis provides novel insight into potential risk factors for tinnitus in patients with chronic middle-ear disease. In summary, both ear discharge and cholesteatoma appear to be inversely associated with perceived tinnitus severity. Patients with poorer overall disease-specific health-related QoL report a greater degree of tinnitus-related annoyance, whereas age, hearing disability and geographical region had no influence. Further studies are necessary to validate these associations and better understand the psychopathology of this common symptom in chronic otitis media.

Competing interests

None declared

Appendix 1. Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12

Footnotes

Dr B V Tailor takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

McCormack, A, Edmondson-Jones, M, Somerset, S, Hall, D. A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hearing Research 2016;337:70–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, BI, Lee, HW, Kim, TY, Lim, JS, Shin, KS. Tinnitus: characteristics, causes, mechanisms, and treatments. J Clin Neurol 2009;5:11–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, LE, Eggermont, JJ, Caspary, DM, Shore, SE, Melcher, JR, Kaltenbach, JA. Ringing ears: the neuroscience of tinnitus. J Neurosci 2010;30:14972–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggermont, JJ, Roberts, LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci 2004;27:676–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaette, R, McAlpine, D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 2011;31:13452–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahafza, N, Zhao, F, El Refaie, A, Chen, F. A comparison of the severity of tinnitus in patients with and without hearing loss using the tinnitus functional index (TFI). Int J Audiol 2021;60:220–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savastano, M. Tinnitus with or without hearing loss: are its characteristics different? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:1295–300CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Axelsson, A, Ringdahl, A. Tinnitus—a study of its prevalence and characteristics. Brit J Audiol 1989;23:5362CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, DC, Phillips, JS. An effective decision-making aid for patients with tinnitus: a retrospective review of 205 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2020;45:818–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kostev, K, Alymova, S, Kössl, M, Jacob, L. Risk factors for tinnitus in 37,692 patients followed in general practices in germany. Otol Neurotol 2019;40:436–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, HM, Han, K do, Kong, SK, Nam, EC, Park, SN, Shim, HJ et al. Epidemiology of clinically significant tinnitus: a 10-year trend from nationwide health claims data in South Korea. Otol Neurotol 2018;39:680–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sindhusake, D, Golding, M, Newall, P, Rubin, G, Jakobsen, K, Mitchell, P. Risk factors for tinnitus in a population of older adults: the blue mountains hearing study. Ear Hear 2003;24:501–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D-K, Park, S-N, Kim, MJ, Lee, SY, Park, K-H, Yeo, SW. Tinnitus in patients with chronic otitis media before and after middle ear surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:1443–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manche, SK, Madhavi, J, Meganadh, KR, Jyothy, A. Association of tinnitus and hearing loss in otological disorders: a decade-long epidemiological study in a South Indian population. Brazil J Otorhinolaryngol 2016;82:643–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, JS, Yung, MW. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures for chronic suppurative otitis media. Laryngoscope 2016;126:1458–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumann, I, Kurpiers, B, Plinkert, PK, Praetorius, M. Development and validation of the Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test 15 (COMOT-15). Measurement of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic otitis media. HNO 2009;57:889–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, JS, Haggard, M, Yung, M. A new health-related quality of life measure for active chronic otitis media (COMQ-12): development and initial validation. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:454–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bächinger, D, Röösli, C, Ditzen, B, Huber, AM. Development and validation of the Zurich chronic middle ear inventory (ZCMEI-21): an electronic questionnaire for assessing quality of life in patients with chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:3073–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H-J, Lee, H-J, An, S-Y, Sim, S, Park, B, Kim, SW et al. Analysis of the prevalence and associated risk factors of tinnitus in adults. PLoS One 2015;10:e0127578CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiller, W, Goebel, G. Factors influencing tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:1323–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, JS, Yung, MW, Nunney, I, Doruk, C, Kara, H, Kong, T et al. Multinational appraisal of the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire 12 (COMQ-12). Otol Neurotol 2020;42:e45–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, ACO, Ramos, P, Balsalobre, FA, Freitas, EL, Phillips, JS, Yung, MW et al. Validation of a Portuguese version of the health-related quality of life measure for active chronic otitis media (COMQ-12). Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2018;84:708–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quaranta, N, De Robertis, V, Milella, C, Pontrelli, M, Greco, A, Fiorella, ML et al. Cross-cultural adaption and validation of the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire 12 (COMQ-12) in the Italian language. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:3027–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doruk, C, Çelik, M, Kara, H, Polat, B, Güldiken, Y, Orhan, KS. Turkish translation and validation of Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;57:24–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celis-Aguilar, E, Medina-Cabrera, CA, Torrontegui-Zazueta, LA, Núñez-Millán, BX, García-Valle, CG, Ochoa-Miranda, CA. Adaptation and validation of the chronic otitis media questionnaire 12 (COMQ-12) in the Mexican Spanish language (COMQ-12-Mx). Acta Otolaryngologica 2020;140:450–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baba, S, Yagi, T, Fujikura, T. Subjective evaluation and overall satisfaction after tympanoplasty for chronic simple suppurative otitis media. J Nippon Med Sch 2004;71:1724CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, P, Sun, W, Wang, W. Prognostic and influencing factors of tinnitus in chronic otitis media after tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:3945CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, HC, Jang, CH, Kim, YY, Seong, JY, Kang, SH, Cho, YB. Role of preoperative air-bone gap in tinnitus outcome after tympanoplasty for chronic otitis media with tinnitus. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2018;84:173–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, A da S, Sanchez, TG, Bonadia Moraes, MF, Batezati Alves, SC, Bento, RF. The effect of timpanoplasty on tinnitus in patients with conductive hearing loss: a six month follow-up. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2007;73:384–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habesoglu, M, Habesoglu, TE, Karatas, C, Tosun, A, Gursel, AO, Oysu, C. Is there any predictor for tinnitus outcome in different types of otologic surgery? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:2225–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittal, R, Lisi, CV, Gerring, R, Mittal, J, Mathee, K, Narasimhan, G et al. Current concepts in the pathogenesis and treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media. J Med Microbiol 2015;64:1103–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erkorkmaz, U, Yilmaz, MS, Guven, M, Kaymaz, R. Determination of factors that impact patient satisfaction following tympanoplasty. Int Adv Otol 2015;10:264–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, JS, Haggard, M, Spencer, H, Yung, M. The Chronic Otitis Media Benefit Inventory (COMBI): development and validation of a dynamic quality of life questionnaire for chronic ear disease. Otol Neurotol 2017;38:701–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stouffer, JL, Tyler, RS. Characterization of tinnitus by tinnitus patients. J Speech Hear Disord 1990;55:439–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatt, JM, Lin, HW, Bhattacharyya, N. Tinnitus epidemiology: prevalence, severity, exposures and treatment patterns in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;142:959–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otoya-Tono, AM, Pérez-Herrera, LC, Peñaranda, D, Moreno-López, S, Sánchez-Pedraza, R, García, JM et al. Validation of a Spanish version of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure for Chronic Otitis Media (COMQ-12). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020;18:362CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, V, Wilson, C, Stephens, D. Quality of life and tinnitus. Audiological Medicine 2004;2:2940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordeiro, FP, Monsanto, R da C, Kasemodel, ALP, Gondra, L de A, Penido, N de O. Extended high-frequency hearing loss following the first episode of otitis media. Laryngoscope 2018;128:2879–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, LL, Margolis, RH, Rykken, JR, Le, CT, Daly, KA, Giebink, GS. High frequency hearing loss associated with otitis media. Ear Hear 1996;17:111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margolis, RH, Saly, GL, Hunter, LL. High-frequency hearing loss and wideband middle ear impedance in children with otitis media histories. Ear Hear 2000;21:206–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, JH, Park, SJ, Kim, YH, Park, M-H. Sensorineural hearing loss: a complication of acute otitis media in adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:1879–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schachern, PA, Paparella, MM, Goycoolea, MV, Duvall, AJ, Choo, YB. The permeability of the round window membrane during otitis media. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:625–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engel, F, Blatz, R, Kellner, J, Palmer, M, Weller, U, Bhadki, S. Breakdown of the round window membrane permeability barrier evoked by streptolysin O: possible etiologic role in development of sensorineural hearing loss in acute otitis media. Infect Immun 1995;63:1305–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, CW, Jung, J, Kim, SH, Byun, JY, Park, MS, Yeo, SG. Comparison of clinical characteristics in patients with bilateral and unilateral tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol 2015;135:1128–31Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Distribution of tinnitus severity and associated participant characteristics*

Figure 1

Table 2. Ordinal logistic regression analysis of factors associated with severity of tinnitus in patients with chronic otitis media