During editorial review of the above published article footnotes were inadvertently modified on four occasions.
Page 194: A footnote containing the text ‘See especially Sparrow, ‘Better Living Through Chemistry: A Reply to Savulescu and Persson on “Moral Enhancement”’, 5; Sparrow, “Egalitarianism and Moral Bioenhancement‘, 20–21’, should have appeared after the sentence: ‘It may even be counterproductive sometimes, which some have taken to constitute a reason against BME’.
Page 196: A footnote containing the text ‘See especially Sparrow, “Better Living Through Chemistry: A Reply to Savulescu and Persson on “Moral Enhancement”’, 5; Sparrow, ‘Egalitarianism and Moral Bioenhancement’, 20–21’, should have appeared after the sentence: ‘Some have taken the objection from moral particularism to constitute a compelling reason against BME’.
Page 207: A footnote containing the text ‘See footnote 37’, corresponding to footnote 35 of the published article, should have appeared after the sentence: ‘For it is an essential characteristic of a practically wise person that he aims to do the morally right thing’.
Page 208, fn. 47: The separate sentence ‘Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu is the corresponding author’ should have appeared after: ‘This chapter is a work of collaboration; both authors contributed equally to the writing of and research for it’.
This addendum will also be included in the print edition of Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 85.
Huang, P.-H., & Tsu, P. S.-H. (2018). Biomedical Moral Enhancement in the Face of Moral Particularism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 83, 189–208.
© The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2018
