Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:34:43.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Necrotising otitis externa: the increasing financial burden on the National Health Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2021

J Godbehere
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK
K H Hutson
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
G J Watson*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr G J Watson, Department of ENT, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Glossop Road, SheffieldS10 2JF, UK E-mail: glen.watson2@nhs.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Necrotising otitis externa is increasingly being seen and treated within the UK. The aim of this study was to explore the potential cost of a cohort of patients with necrotising otitis externa presenting to a single tertiary NHS trust.

Method

This was a retrospective study with data from 14 patients with confirmed necrotising otitis externa who were treated, monitored, discharged or who died between October 2016 and November 2018. Direct costs using the tariffs from the 2018 to 2019 financial year included in-patient stay, imaging, peripheral inserted central catheter line cost, ENT and out-patient parenteral antibiotic therapy visits and antimicrobial duration.

Results

The mean cost of treatment per patient was £17 615 (range, £9407 to £38 230) with an extreme outlier costing more than £122 000.

Conclusion

Awareness and education at a primary care level and research into robust imaging to aid termination of treatment may lower costs in the future by catching pathology early and reducing treatment duration.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Introduction

Malignant otitis externa was first described by Chandler in 1968 as a serious infection of the external auditory canal causing osteomyelitis of the temporal bone and skull base.Reference Chandler1 Necrotising otitis externa was used synonymously to describe this disease and reflect the high mortality associated with it, which was as high as 50 per cent prior to the introduction of antibiotic therapy.Reference Chawdhary, Liow, Democratis and Whiteside2

Although still considered a rare complication of unresolved otitis externa, a recent UK-based study reported a six-fold increase in hospital admissions between 1999 and 2013.Reference Chawdhary, Liow, Democratis and Whiteside2 The precise reason is not fully understood, but increasing incidence of diabetes, longer lifespan, emergence of microbial resistance and increasing awareness all undoubtedly play a role.Reference Hollis and Evans3

Despite the condition being known for more than 50 years, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the definition, diagnosis and management of necrotising otitis externa on a national and international basis.Reference Chawdhary, Pankhania, Douglas and Bottrill4,Reference Mahdyoun, Pulcini, Gahide, Raffaelli, Savoldelli and Castillo5 This confusion can delay diagnosis, leading to suboptimal treatment with significant morbidity and mortality to the patient. Besides this disease burden, there is also a cost associated with management.

The aim of this study was to explore the potential cost of patients with necrotising otitis externa presenting to a single tertiary NHS Trust throughout the duration of their treatment and to summarise the key clinical findings.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

All patients with confirmed necrotising otitis externa who were treated, monitored, discharged or died in a single tertiary NHS trust were included in this retrospective case series between October 2016 and November 2018.

Patient data collection

The following data was collected: age, gender, risk factors, precipitating events, diagnostic imaging, microbiology results, antimicrobial therapy, duration of in-patient hospital stay, duration of treatment, recurrence, surgery and mortality recorded as a direct result of necrotising otitis externa.

Costing data

Costing tariffs were sought from the Trust's finance department for the year 2018 to 2019. The domains included: cost of in-patient stay, imaging, peripheral inserted central catheter line cost, ENT and out-patient parenteral antibiotic therapy visits and antimicrobial duration cost for the duration of treatment.

Results

Over the time period, 14 patients (11 male, 3 female) were diagnosed, monitored and discharged without recurrence of necrotising otitis externa. One male patient had recurrent disease and despite prolonged antimicrobial therapy, surgery and hyperbaric oxygen therapy succumbed to necrotising otitis externa.

All patients were admitted under the senior author and managed jointly with infectious disease and microbiology teams following local necrotising otitis externa management guidelines.Reference Hutson and Watson6

Patients had swabs taken from the external auditory meatus for culture and sensitivity as well as biopsies to exclude malignancy. They all had computed tomography (CT) and post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to determine bony erosion as well as volume of soft tissue disease and evidence of intracranial complications. Patients underwent regular aural toileting, pain and diabetic control if needed.

A total of 75 per cent of patients were commenced on tazobactam and piperacillin (Tazocin®) as first line anti-pseudomonal intravenous therapy following the Trust's necrotising otitis externa antimicrobial guidelines. The remaining patients received ceftazidime in combination with either metronidazole, teicoplanin or oral fluconazole as directed by microbiology and infectious diseases teams. Most patients required at least 1 change in antibiotic therapy with a mean of 2.9 antibiotics for each case and with a maximum of 5 in one case.

Where possible, patients had peripheral inserted central catheter lines inserted shortly after admission and were discharged from the acute tertiary centre for ongoing antimicrobial therapy in the community. The mean length of hospital stay was 12 days with a range from 6 to 221 days. The significant fluctuating length of stay between patients was a result of social circumstances delaying safe discharge into the community, medical complications such as poor diabetic control or disease recurrence, and the need for palliation (surgery, adjunct hyperbaric oxygen therapy and in-patient stay (221 patients)).

Treatment was continued for a minimum of six weeks. The length of antimicrobial therapy varied between 8 and 31 weeks with a mean of 18 weeks. Termination of treatment was based on resolution of clinical symptoms and return to normal of the ear canal and inflammatory markers (white cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein).

All patients were reviewed on a 6-to-8-week basis (or sooner if they developed recurrent symptoms) for a full year. Table 1 is a summary of the key patient findings.

Table 1. Summary of 14 patients with necrotising otitis externa managed over the specified time period

*Outlier due to severe recurrent disease. CT = computed tomography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging

Table 2 provides a summary of the domains that were collected for each patient with their associated tariff based on the 2018 to 2019 financial year.

Table 2. Costing domains based on 2018 to 2019 financial years

Table 3 provides details of the duration of in-patients in days, number of imaging modalities, different antimicrobial regimes, number of peripheral inserted central catheter lines, and follow up for out-patient parenteral antibiotic therapy and ENT for 13 patients, with the individual and mean costs in the last column. The average cost for this group of patients was £17 615 (range, £9407 to £38 230).

Table 3. Individual and mean costs for 13 of the 14 patients (excluding the outlying patient)

*Computed tomography (CT) cost was £70 each; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was £110 each; peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) line cost was £384 each; **out-patient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) appointments cost £53 each; §ENT out-patient department (OPD) appointments cost £53 each. IAM = internal auditory meatus

The cost related to the patient who succumbed to necrotising otitis externa was calculated separately in Table 4; the total cost for this patient was £122 864. This was calculated separately because this patient had a prolonged treatment and would have skewed the direct costs of the other patients. The cost of major ear surgery and hyperbaric treatment for this patient was not included.

Table 4. Individual costs of patient who succumbed to necrotising otitis externa

*Computed tomography (CT) cost was £70 each; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was £110 each; peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) line cost was £384 each; **out-patient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) appointments cost £53 each; §ENT out-patient department (OPD) appointments cost £53 each. IAM = internal auditory meatus

Discussion

Despite being a recognised condition for more than 50 years, there is still no consensus on the definition, diagnostic parameters and management of malignant or necrotising otitis externa.Reference Mahdyoun, Pulcini, Gahide, Raffaelli, Savoldelli and Castillo5 This can lead to confusion and delay in diagnosis with resulting increasing morbidity and disease burden for the patient.

It is clear in recent times, for reasons not fully appreciated, that there is an increase in the number of cases of necrotising otitis externa being admitted and treated in the NHS.Reference Mahdyoun, Pulcini, Gahide, Raffaelli, Savoldelli and Castillo5 These cases still fit the profile of largely older, diabetic male patients with pseudomonal infections. Despite a minimum of six weeks of intravenous antimicrobial therapy being set as the minimum treatment duration,Reference Courson, Vikram and Barrs7 our duration showed a mean of 18 weeks (range, 8–33 weeks). Without robust evidence-based management pathways and varying disease volumes, treatment duration will vary considerably and thus drive up costs.Reference Hutson and Watson6

In our series, the average cost was £17 615 per patient. This ranged from £9414 through to a staggering £122 864. The latter figure arose because of refractory residual disease that resulted in palliation and death. These costs were in fact higher as we did not take into account the surgery the patient had as well as adjunct hyperbaric oxygen therapy (the only patient to receive these adjunct treatments in this cohort).

By close monitoring of patients by a single named clinician as well as managing them under a dedicated multidisciplinary team, antimicrobial usage is optimised and duration kept as short as possible, which helps to reduce costs.Reference Matthews, Conlon, Berendt, Kayley, Jefferies and Atkins8

Research work on robust diagnostic and monitoring imaging modalities (in particular positron emission tomography-CT) is looking very promising and will be useful at directing termination of treatment in the future.Reference van Kroonenburgh, van der Meer, Bothof, van Tilburg, van Tongeren and Postma9Reference Stern Shavit, Bernstine, Sopov, Nageris and Hilly14

  • Necrotising otitis externa secondary to otitis externa is an increasing disease entity within the UK and is associated with significant morbidity and socio-economic costs

  • In the UK there is still no common consensus with regard to diagnosis, management and length of treatment for necrotising otitis externa

  • This article estimates the high financial burden of necrotising otitis externa within one tertiary referral centre

  • Awareness and education at a primary care level and developing evidence-based management pathways may help reduce the health and economic costs

Awareness and education in the primary care setting is also a potential key area to focus on. Early recognition of a progressing otitis externa with timely intervention may reduce disease volume and cost.

Meticulous care while cleaning or syringing ears in vulnerable patient groups (elderly, diabetic or immunocompromised patients) is paramount. Should this group develop acute otitis externa irrespective of the precipitating factor, then the utmost vigilance is required to ensure they respond to topical antimicrobial treatment within a 7 to 10 day period. Should treatment fail or patients deteriorate, then there should be a low threshold for an expert ENT opinion with an interest in necrotising otitis externa.Reference Rosenfeld, Schwartz, Ron Cannon, Roland, Simon and Kumar15

In this study, we have only considered direct costs to the Trust. We did not consider the economic impact of younger patients who may have had employment disrupted or the burden to carers bringing relatives to multiple appointments, transport costs for frail patients and the burden of increased care for older patients.

Competing interests

None declared

Footnotes

Mr G J Watson takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Chandler, JR. Malignant otitis externa. Laryngoscope 1968;78:1257–9410.1288/00005537-196808000-00002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawdhary, G, Liow, N, Democratis, J, Whiteside, O. Necrotising (malignant) otitis externa in the UK: a growing problem. Review of five cases and analysis of national Hospital episode statistics trends. J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:600–310.1017/S002221511500105XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollis, S, Evans, K. Management of malignant (necrotising) otitis externa. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:1212–1710.1017/S0022215110002550CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chawdhary, G, Pankhania, M, Douglas, S, Bottrill, I. Current management of necrotising otitis externa in the UK: survey of 221 UK otolaryngologists. Acta Oto-Laryngolica 2017;137:818–2210.1080/00016489.2017.1295468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahdyoun, P, Pulcini, C, Gahide, I, Raffaelli, C, Savoldelli, C, Castillo, L et al. Necrotizing otitis externa: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:620–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutson, KH, Watson, GJ. Malignant otitis externa, an increasing burden in the twenty-first century: review of cases in a UK teaching hospital, with a proposed algorithm for diagnosis and management. J Laryngol Otol 2019;133:356–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courson, AM, Vikram, HR, Barrs, DM. What are the criteria for terminating treatment for necrotizing (malignant) otitis externa? Laryngoscope 2014;124:361–210.1002/lary.24093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, PC, Conlon, CP, Berendt, AR, Kayley, J, Jefferies, L, Atkins, BL et al. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OUT-PATIENT PARENTERAL ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY): is it safe for selected patients to self-administer at home? A retrospective analysis of a large cohort over 13 years. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:356–6210.1093/jac/dkm210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kroonenburgh, AMJL, van der Meer, WL, Bothof, RJP, van Tilburg, M, van Tongeren, J, Postma, AA. Advanced imaging techniques in skull base osteomyelitis due to malignant otitis externa. Curr Radiol Rep 2018;6:3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozenblum-Beddok, L, Verillaud, B, Paycha, F, Vironneau, P, Abulizi, M, Benada, A et al. 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy for diagnosis and therapy monitoring of skull base osteomyelitis. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2018;14:218–2410.1002/lio2.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vion, PA, Verillaud, B, Paycha, F, Benada, A, El-Deeb, G, Herman, P et al. 99m Tc-HMPAO-leucocyte scintigraphy and [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and therapy monitoring in eleven patients with skull base osteomyelitis. Clin Otolaryngol 2020;45:591–410.1111/coa.13528CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, WJ, Finegersh, A, Narayanan, A, Chan, JYK. Meta-analysis does not support routine traditional nuclear medicine studies for malignant otitis. Laryngoscope 2020;130:1812–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, SC, Padma, S, Shanmuga Sundaram, P. In the evaluation of patients with skull base osteomyelitis, does 18F-FDG PET CT have a role? Nucl Med Commun 2020;41:550–910.1097/MNM.0000000000001187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern Shavit, S, Bernstine, H, Sopov, V, Nageris, B, Hilly, O. FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and follow-up of necrotizing (malignant) external otitis. Laryngoscope 2019;129:961–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, RM, Schwartz, SR, Ron Cannon, C, Roland, PS, Simon, GR, Kumar, KA et al. Clinical practice guideline: acute otitis externa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;150:S124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of 14 patients with necrotising otitis externa managed over the specified time period

Figure 1

Table 2. Costing domains based on 2018 to 2019 financial years

Figure 2

Table 3. Individual and mean costs for 13 of the 14 patients (excluding the outlying patient)

Figure 3

Table 4. Individual costs of patient who succumbed to necrotising otitis externa